Keats

0631

0631f

Keats

  KEATS


  BY SIDNEY COLVIN


  MACMILLAN AND CO., LIMITED
  ST MARTIN'S STREET, LONDON
  1909




  _First Edition 1887._
      _Reprinted 1889, 1898, 1899, 1902, 1909._
  _Library Edition 1902._
      _Reprinted 1906._
  _Pocket Edition 1909._




PREFACE.


With the name of Keats that of his first biographer, the late Lord
Houghton, must always justly remain associated. But while the sympathetic
charm of Lord Houghton's work will keep it fresh, as a record of the
poet's life it can no longer be said to be sufficient. Since the revised
edition of the _Life and Letters_ appeared in 1867, other students and
lovers of Keats have been busy, and much new information concerning him
been brought to light, while of the old information some has been proved
mistaken. No connected account of Keats's life and work, in accordance
with the present state of knowledge, exists, and I have been asked to
contribute such an account to the present series. I regret that lack of
strength and leisure has so long delayed the execution of the task
entrusted to me. The chief authorities and printed texts which I have
consulted (besides the original editions of the Poems) are the
following:--

1. Lord Byron and some of his Contemporaries. By Leigh Hunt. London, 1828.

2. The Life of Percy Bysshe Shelley. By Thomas Medwin. London, 2 vols.,
1847.

3. Life, Letters, and Literary Remains of John Keats. Edited by Richard
Monckton Milnes. 2 vols., London, 1848.

4. Life of Benjamin Robert Haydon. Edited and compiled by Tom Taylor.
Second edition. 3 vols., London, 1853.

5. The Autobiography of Leigh Hunt, with Reminiscences of Friends and
Contemporaries. 3 vols., London, 1850.

6. The Poetical Works of John Keats. With a memoir by Richard Monckton
Milnes. London, 1854.

7. The Autobiography of Leigh Hunt. [Revised edition, edited by Thornton
Hunt.] London, 1860.

8. The Vicissitudes of Keats's Fame: an article by Joseph Severn in the
_Atlantic Monthly Magazine_ for 1863 (vol. xi. p. 401).

9. The Life and Letters of John Keats. By Lord Houghton. New edition,
London, 1867.

10. Recollections of John Keats: an article by Charles Cowden Clarke in
the _Gentleman's Magazine_ for 1874 (N. S. vol. xii. p. 177). Afterwards
reprinted with modifications in Recollections of Writers, by Charles and
Mary Cowden Clarke. London, 1878.

11. The Papers of a Critic. Selected from the writings of the late Charles
Wentworth Dilke. With a biographical notice by Sir Charles Wentworth
Dilke, Bart., M.P. 2 vols., London, 1875.

12. Benjamin Robert Haydon: Correspondence and Table-Talk. With a memoir
by Frederic Wordsworth Haydon. 2 vols., London, 1876.

13. The Poetical Works of John Keats, chronologically arranged and edited,
with a memoir, by Lord Houghton [Aldine edition of the British Poets].
London, 1876.

14. Letters of John Keats to Fanny Brawne, with Introduction and Notes by
Harry Buxton Forman. London, 1878.

A biographer cannot ignore these letters now that they are published: but
their publication must be regretted by all who hold that human respect and
delicacy are due to the dead no less than to the living, and to genius no
less than to obscurity.

15. The Poetical Works and other Writings of John Keats. Edited with notes
and appendices by Harry Buxton Forman. 4 vols., London, 1883.

In this edition, besides the texts reprinted from the first editions, all
the genuine letters and additional poems published in 3, 6, 9, 13, and 14
of the above are brought together, as well as most of the biographical
notices contained in 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 10, and 12: also a series of
previously unpublished letters of Keats to his sister: with a great amount
of valuable illustrative and critical material besides. Except for a few
errors, which I shall have occasion to point out, Mr Forman's work might
for the purpose of the student be final, and I have necessarily been
indebted to it at every turn.

16. The Letters and Poems of John Keats. Edited by John Gilmer Speed. 3
vols., New York, 1883.

17. The Poetical Works of John Keats. Edited by William T. Arnold. London,
1884.

The Introduction to this edition contains the only attempt with which I am
acquainted at an analysis of the formal elements of Keats's style.

18. An Æsculapian Poet--John Keats: an article by Dr B. W. Richardson in
the _Asclepiad_ for 1884 (vol. i. p. 134).

19. Notices and correspondence concerning Keats which have appeared at
intervals during a number of years in the _Athenæum_.

In addition to printed materials I have made use of the following
unprinted, viz.:--

I. HOUGHTON MSS. Under this title I refer to the contents of an album from
the library at Fryston Hall, in which the late Lord Houghton bound up a
quantity of the materials he had used in the preparation of the _Life and
Letters_, as well as of correspondence concerning Keats addressed to him
both before and after the publication of his book. The chief contents are
the manuscript memoir of Keats by Charles Brown, which was offered by the
writer in vain to _Galignani_, and I believe other publishers; transcripts
by the same hand of a few of Keats's poems; reminiscences or brief memoirs
of the poet by his friends Charles Cowden Clarke (the first draft of the
paper above cited as no. 10), Henry Stephens, George Felton Mathew, Joseph
Severn, and Benjamin Bailey; together with letters from all the above,
from John Hamilton Reynolds, and several others. For the use of this
collection, without which my work must have been attempted to little
purpose, I am indebted to the kindness of its owner, the present Lord
Houghton.

II. WOODHOUSE MSS. A. A common-place book in which Richard Woodhouse, the
friend of Keats and of his publishers Messrs Taylor and Hessey,
transcribed--as would appear from internal evidence, about midsummer
1819--the chief part of Keats's poems at that date unpublished. The
transcripts are in many cases made from early drafts of the poems: some
contain gaps which Woodhouse has filled up in pencil from later drafts: to
others are added corrections, or suggestions for corrections, some made in
the hand of Mr Taylor and some in that of Keats himself.

III. WOODHOUSE MSS. B. A note-book in which the same Woodhouse has
copied--evidently for Mr Taylor, at the time when that gentleman was
meditating a biography of the poet--a number of letters addressed by Keats
to Mr Taylor himself, to the transcriber, to Reynolds and his sisters, to
Rice, and Bailey. Three or four of these letters, as well as portions of a
few others, are unpublished.

Both the volumes last named were formerly the property of Mrs Taylor, a
niece by marriage of the publisher, and are now my own. A third note-book
by Woodhouse, containing personal notices and recollections of Keats, was
unluckily destroyed in the fire at Messrs Kegan Paul and Co's. premises in
1883. A copy of _Endymion_, annotated by the same hand, has been used by
Mr Forman in his edition (above, no. 15).

IV. SEVERN MSS. The papers and correspondence left by the late Joseph
Severn, containing materials for what should be a valuable biography, have
been put into the hands of Mr William Sharp, to be edited and published at
his discretion. In the meantime Mr Sharp has been so kind as to let me
have access to such parts of them as relate to Keats. The most important
single piece, an essay on 'The Vicissitudes of Keats's Fame,' has been
printed already in the _Atlantic Monthly_ (above, no. 8), but in the
remainder I have found many interesting details, particularly concerning
Keats's voyage to Italy and life at Rome.

V. _Rawlings v. Jennings._ When Keats's maternal grandfather, Mr John
Jennings, died in 1805, leaving property exceeding the amount of the
specific bequests under his will, it was thought necessary that his estate
should be administered by the Court of Chancery, and with that intent a
friendly suit was brought in the names of his daughter and her second
husband (Frances Jennings, _m._ 1st Thomas Keats, and 2nd William
Rawlings) against her mother and brother, who were the executors. The
proceedings in this suit are referred to under the above title. They are
complicated and voluminous, extending over a period of twenty years, and
my best thanks are due to Mr Ralph Thomas, of 27 Chancery Lane, for his
friendly pains in searching through and making abstracts of them.

For help and information, besides what has been above acknowledged, I am
indebted first and foremost to my friend and colleague, Mr Richard
Garnett; and next to the poet's surviving sister, Mrs Llanos; to Sir
Charles Dilke, who lent me the chief part of his valuable collection of
Keats's books and papers (already well turned to account by Mr Forman); to
Dr B. W. Richardson, and the Rev. R. H. Hadden. Other incidental
obligations will be found acknowledged in the footnotes.

Among essays on and reviews of Keats's work I need only refer in
particular to that by the late Mrs F. M. Owen (Keats: a Study, London,
1876). In its main outlines, though not in details, I accept and have
followed this lady's interpretation of _Endymion_. For the rest, every
critic of modern English poetry is of necessity a critic of Keats. The
earliest, Leigh Hunt, was one of the best; and to name only a few among
the living--where Mr Matthew Arnold, Mr Swinburne, Mr Lowell, Mr Palgrave,
Mr W. M. Rossetti, Mr W. B. Scott, Mr Roden Noel, Mr Theodore Watts, have
gone before, for one who follows to be both original and just is not easy.
In the following pages I have not attempted to avoid saying over again
much that in substance has been said already, and doubtless better, by
others: by Mr Matthew Arnold and Mr Palgrave especially. I doubt not but
they will forgive me: and at the same time I hope to have contributed
something of my own towards a fuller understanding both of Keats's art and
life.




CONTENTS.


                                                                      PAGE

  CHAPTER I.

  Birth and Parentage--School Life at Enfield--Life as Surgeon's
  Apprentice at Edmonton--Awakening to Poetry--Life as Hospital
  Student in London. [1795-1817]                                         1

  CHAPTER II.

  Particulars of Early Life in London--Friendships and First
  Poems--Henry Stephens--Felton Mathew--Cowden Clarke--Leigh
  Hunt: his Literary and Personal Influence--John Hamilton
  Reynolds--James Rice--Cornelius Webb--Shelley--Haydon--Joseph
  Severn--Charles Wells--Personal Characteristics--
  Determination to publish. [1814-April, 1817]                          18

  CHAPTER III.

  The _Poems_ of 1817                                                   50

  CHAPTER IV.

  Excursion to Isle of Wight, Margate, and Canterbury--Summer
  at Hampstead--New Friends: Dilke: Brown: Bailey--With Bailey
  at Oxford--Return: Old Friends at Odds--Burford Bridge--Winter
  at Hampstead--Wordsworth: Lamb: Hazlitt--Poetical Activity--
  Spring at Teignmouth--Studies and Anxieties--Marriage and
  Emigration of George Keats. [April, 1817-May, 1818]                   67

  CHAPTER V.

  _Endymion_                                                            93

  CHAPTER VI.

  Northern Tour--The _Blackwood_ and _Quarterly_ reviews--Death
  of Tom Keats--Removal to Wentworth Place--Fanny Brawne--
  Excursion to Chichester--Absorption in Love and Poetry--Haydon
  and money difficulties--Family Correspondence--Darkening
  Prospects--Summer at Shanklin and Winchester--Wise
  Resolutions--Return from Winchester. [June, 1818-October,
  1819]                                                                111

  CHAPTER VII.

  _Isabella_--_Hyperion_--_The Eve of St Agnes_--_The Eve of St
  Mark_--_La Belle Dame Sans Merci_--_Lamia_--The Odes--The
  Plays                                                                147

  CHAPTER VIII.

  Return to Wentworth Place--Autumn Occupations--The _Cap and
  Bells_--Recast of _Hyperion_--Growing Despondency--Visit of
  George Keats to England--Attack of Illness in February--Rally
  in the Spring--Summer in Kentish Town--Publication of the
  _Lamia_ Volume--Relapse--Ordered South--Voyage to Italy--
  Naples--Rome--Last Days and Death. [October, 1819-Feb. 1821]         180

  CHAPTER IX.

  Character and Genius                                                 209

  APPENDIX                                                             221

  INDEX                                                                234




KEATS.




CHAPTER I.

    Birth and Parentage--School Life at Enfield--Life as Surgeon's
    Apprentice at Edmonton--Awakening to Poetry--Life as Hospital Student
    in London. [1795-1817.]


Science may one day ascertain the laws of distribution and descent which
govern the births of genius; but in the meantime a birth like that of
Keats presents to the ordinary mind a striking instance of nature's
inscrutability. If we consider the other chief poets of the time, we can
commonly recognize either some strain of power in their blood, or some
strong inspiring influence in the scenery and traditions of their home.
Thus we see Scott prepared alike by his origin, associations, and
circumstances to be the 'minstrel of his clan' and poet of the romance of
the border wilds; while the spirit of the Cumbrian hills, and the temper
of the generations bred among them, speak naturally through the lips of
Wordsworth. Byron seems inspired in literature by demons of the same
froward brood that had urged others of his lineage through lives of
adventure or of crime. But Keats, with instincts and faculties more purely
poetical than any of these, was paradoxically born in a dull and middling
walk of English city life; and 'if by traduction came his mind,'--to quote
Dryden with a difference,--it was through channels too obscure for us to
trace. His father, Thomas Keats, was a west-country lad who came young to
London, and while still under twenty held the place of head ostler in a
livery-stable kept by a Mr John Jennings in Finsbury. Presently he married
his employer's daughter, Frances Jennings; and Mr Jennings, who was a man
of substance, retiring about the same time to live in the country, at
Ponder's End, left the management of the business in the hands of his
son-in-law. The young couple lived at the stable, at the sign of the
Swan-and-Hoop, Finsbury Pavement, facing the then open space of Lower
Moorfields. Here their eldest child, the poet JOHN KEATS, was born
prematurely on either the 29th or 31st of October, 1795. A second son,
named George, followed on February 28, 1797; a third, Tom, on November 18,
1799; a fourth, Edward, who died in infancy, on April 28, 1801; and on the
3rd of June, 1803, a daughter, Frances Mary. In the meantime the family
had moved from the stable to a house in Craven Street, City Road, half a
mile farther north[1].

In the gifts and temperament of Keats we shall find much that seems
characteristic of the Celtic rather than the English nature. Whether he
really had any of that blood in his veins we cannot tell. His father was a
native either of Devon or of Cornwall[2]; and his mother's name, Jennings,
is common in but not peculiar to Wales. There our evidence ends, and all
that we know further of his parents is that they were certainly not quite
ordinary people. Thomas Keats was noticed in his life-time as a man of
intelligence and conduct--"of so remarkably fine a common sense and
native respectability," writes Cowden Clarke, in whose father's school
the poet and his brothers were brought up, "that I perfectly remember the
warm terms in which his demeanour used to be canvassed by my parents after
he had been to visit his boys." It is added that he resembled his
illustrious son in person and feature, being of small stature and lively
energetic countenance, with brown hair and hazel eyes. Of his wife, the
poet's mother, we learn more vaguely that she was "tall, of good figure,
with large oval face, and sensible deportment": and again that she was a
lively, clever, impulsive woman, passionately fond of amusement, and
supposed to have hastened the birth of her eldest child by some
imprudence. Her second son, George, wrote in after life of her and of her
family as follows:--"my grandfather [Mr Jennings] was very well off, as
his will shows, and but that he was extremely generous and gullible would
have been affluent. I have heard my grandmother speak with enthusiasm of
his excellencies, and Mr Abbey used to say that he never saw a woman of
the talents and sense of my grandmother, except my mother." And
elsewhere:--"my mother I distinctly remember, she resembled John very much
in the face, was extremely fond of him, and humoured him in every whim, of
which he had not a few, she was a most excellent and affectionate parent,
and as I thought a woman of uncommon talents."

The mother's passion for her firstborn son was devotedly returned by him.
Once as a young child, when she was ordered to be left quiet during an
illness, he is said to have insisted on keeping watch at her door with an
old sword, and allowing no one to go in. Haydon, an artist who loved to
lay his colours thick, gives this anecdote of the sword a different
turn:--"He was when an infant a most violent and ungovernable child. At
five years of age or thereabouts, he once got hold of a naked sword and
shutting the door swore nobody should go out. His mother wanted to do so,
but he threatened her so furiously she began to cry, and was obliged to
wait till somebody through the window saw her position and came to the
rescue." Another trait of the poet's childhood, mentioned also by Haydon,
on the authority of a gammer who had known him from his birth, is that
when he was first learning to speak, instead of answering sensibly, he had
a trick of making a rhyme to the last word people said and then laughing.

The parents were ambitious for their boys, and would have liked to send
them to Harrow, but thinking this beyond their means, chose the school
kept by the Rev. John Clarke at Enfield. The brothers of Mrs Keats had
been educated here, and the school was one of good repute, and of
exceptionally pleasant aspect and surroundings. Traces of its ancient
forest character lingered long, and indeed linger yet, about the
neighbourhood of the picturesque small suburban town of Enfield, and the
district was one especially affected by City men of fortune for their
homes. The school-house occupied by Mr Clarke had been originally built
for a rich West-India merchant, in the finest style of early Georgian
classic architecture, and stood in a pleasant and spacious garden at the
lower end of the town. When years afterwards the site was used for a
railway station, the old house was for some time allowed to stand: but
later it was taken down, and the façade, with its fine proportions and
rich ornaments in moulded brick, was transported to the South Kensington
Museum as a choice example of the style.

Not long after Keats had been put to school he lost his father, who was
killed by a fall from his horse as he rode home at night from Southgate.
This was on the 16th of April, 1804. Within twelve months his mother had
put off her weeds, and taken a second husband--one William Rawlings,
described as 'of Moorgate in the city of London, stable-keeper,'
presumably therefore the successor of her first husband in the management
of her father's business. This marriage turned out unhappily. It was soon
followed by a separation, and Mrs Rawlings went with her children to live
at Edmonton, in the house of her mother, Mrs Jennings, who was just about
this time left a widow[3]. In the correspondence of the Keats brothers
after they were grown up, no mention is ever made of their step-father, of
whom after the separation the family seem to have lost all knowledge. The
household in Church Street, Edmonton, was well enough provided for, Mr
Jennings having left a fortune of over £13,000, of which, in addition to
other legacies, he bequeathed a capital yielding £200 a year to his widow
absolutely; one yielding £50 a year to his daughter Frances Rawlings, with
reversion to her Keats children after her death; and £1000 to be
separately held in trust for the said children and divided among them on
their coming of age[4]. Between this home, then, and the neighbouring
Enfield school, where he was in due time joined by his younger brothers,
the next four or five years of Keats's boyhood (1806-1810) were passed in
sufficient comfort and pleasantness. He did not live to attain the years,
or the success, of men who write their reminiscences; and almost the only
recollections he has left of his own early days refer to holiday times in
his grandmother's house at Edmonton. They are conveyed in some rhymes
which he wrote years afterwards by way of foolishness to amuse his young
sister, and testify to a partiality, common also to little boys not of
genius, for dabbling by the brookside--

  "In spite
  Of the might
  Of the Maid,
  Nor afraid
  Of his granny-good"--

and for keeping small fishes in tubs.

If we learn little of Keats's early days from his own lips, we have
sufficient testimony as to the impression which he made on his school
companions; which was that of a boy all spirit and generosity, vehement
both in tears and laughter, handsome, passionate, pugnacious, placable,
loveable, a natural leader and champion among his fellows. But beneath
this bright and mettlesome outside there lay deep in his nature, even from
the first, a strain of painful sensibility making him subject to moods of
unreasonable suspicion and self-tormenting melancholy. These he was
accustomed to conceal from all except his brothers, between whom and
himself there existed the very closest of fraternal ties. George, the
second brother, had all John's spirit of manliness and honour, with a less
impulsive disposition and a cooler blood: from a boy he was the bigger and
stronger of the two: and at school found himself continually involved in
fights for, and not unfrequently with, his small, indomitably fiery elder
brother. Tom, the youngest, was always delicate, and an object of
protecting care as well as the warmest affection to the other two. The
singularly strong family sentiment that united the three brothers extended
naturally also to their sister, then a child: and in a more remote and
ideal fashion to their uncle by the mother's side, Captain Midgley John
Jennings, a tall navy officer who had served with some distinction under
Duncan at Camperdown, and who impressed the imagination of the boys, in
those days of militant British valour by land and sea, as a model of manly
prowess[5]. It may be remembered that there was a much more distinguished
naval hero of the time who bore their own name--the gallant Admiral Sir
Richard Godwin Keats of the _Superb_, afterwards governor of Greenwich
Hospital: and he, like their father, came from the west country, being the
son of a Bideford clergyman. But it seems clear that the family of our
Keats claimed no connection with that of the Admiral.

Here are some of George Keats's recollections, written after the death of
his elder brother, and referring partly to their school-days and partly to
John's character after he was grown up:--

    "I loved him from boyhood even when he wronged me, for the goodness of
    his heart and the nobleness of his spirit, before we left school we
    quarrelled often and fought fiercely, and I can safely say and my
    schoolfellows will bear witness that John's temper was the cause of
    all, still we were more attached than brothers ever are."

    "From the time we were boys at school, where we loved, jangled, and
    fought alternately, until we separated in 1818, I in a great measure
    relieved him by continual sympathy, explanation, and inexhaustible
    spirits and good humour, from many a bitter fit of hypochondriasm. He
    avoided teazing any one with his miseries but Tom and myself, and
    often asked our forgiveness; venting and discussing them gave him
    relief."

Let us turn now from these honest and warm brotherly reminiscences to
their confirmation in the words of two of Keats's school-friends; and
first in those of his junior Edward Holmes, afterwards author of the _Life
of Mozart_:--

    "Keats was in childhood not attached to books. His _penchant_ was for
    fighting. He would fight any one--morning, noon, and night, his
    brother among the rest. It was meat and drink to him.... His
    favourites were few; after they were known to fight readily he seemed
    to prefer them for a sort of grotesque and buffoon humour.... He was a
    boy whom any one from his extraordinary vivacity and personal beauty
    might easily fancy would become great--but rather in some military
    capacity than in literature. You will remark that this taste came out
    rather suddenly and unexpectedly.... In all active exercises he
    excelled. The generosity and daring of his character with the extreme
    beauty and animation of his face made I remember an impression on
    me--and being some years his junior I was obliged to woo his
    friendship--in which I succeeded, but not till I had fought several
    battles. This violence and vehemence--this pugnacity and generosity of
    disposition--in passions of tears or outrageous fits of
    laughter--always in extremes--will help to paint Keats in his boyhood.
    Associated as they were with an extraordinary beauty of person and
    expression, these qualities captivated the boys, and no one was more
    popular[6]."

Entirely to the same effect is the account of Keats given by a school
friend seven or eight years older than himself, to whose appreciation and
encouragement the world most likely owes it that he first ventured into
poetry. This was the son of the master, Charles Cowden Clarke, who towards
the close of a long life, during which he had deserved well of literature
in more ways than one, wrote retrospectively of Keats:--

    "He was a favourite with all. Not the less beloved was he for having a
    highly pugnacious spirit, which when roused was one of the most
    picturesque exhibitions--off the stage--I ever saw.... Upon one
    occasion, when an usher, on account of some impertinent behaviour, had
    boxed his brother Tom's ears, John rushed up, put himself into the
    received posture of offence, and, it was said, struck the usher--who
    could, so to say, have put him in his pocket. His passion at times was
    almost ungovernable; and his brother George, being considerably the
    taller and stronger, used frequently to hold him down by main force,
    laughing when John was "in one of his moods," and was endeavouring to
    beat him. It was all, however, a wisp-of-straw conflagration; for he
    had an intensely tender affection for his brothers, and proved it upon
    the most trying occasions. He was not merely the favourite of all,
    like a pet prize-fighter, for his terrier courage; but his
    highmindedness, his utter unconsciousness of a mean motive, his
    placability, his generosity, wrought so general a feeling in his
    behalf, that I never heard a word of disapproval from any one,
    superior or equal, who had known him."

The same excellent witness records in agreement with the last that in his
earlier school-days Keats showed no particular signs of an intellectual
bent, though always orderly and methodical in what he did. But during his
last few terms, that is in his fourteenth and fifteenth years, all the
energies of his nature turned to study. He became suddenly and completely
absorbed in reading, and would be continually at work before school-time
in the morning and during play-hours in the afternoon: could hardly be
induced to join the school games: and never willingly had a book out of
his hand. At this time he won easily all the literature prizes of the
school, and in addition to his proper work imposed on himself such
voluntary tasks as the translation of the whole Æneid in prose. He
devoured all the books of history, travel, and fiction in the school
library, and was for ever borrowing more from the friend who tells the
story. "In my mind's eye I now see him at supper sitting back on the form
from the table, holding the folio volume of Burnet's 'History of his Own
Time' between himself and the table, eating his meal from beyond it. This
work, and Leigh Hunt's 'Examiner'--which my father took in, and I used to
lend to Keats--no doubt laid the foundation of his love of civil and
religious liberty." But the books which Keats read with the greatest
eagerness of all were books of ancient mythology, and he seemed literally
to learn by heart the contents of Tooke's _Pantheon_, Lempriere's
_Dictionary_, and the school abridgment by Tindal of Spence's
_Polymetis_--the first the most foolish and dull, the last the most
scholarly and polite, of the various handbooks in which the ancient fables
were presented in those days to the apprehension of youth.

Trouble fell upon Keats in the midst of these ardent studies of his latter
school-days. His mother had been for some time in failing health. First
she was disabled by chronic rheumatism, and at last fell into a rapid
consumption, which carried her off in February 1810. We are told with what
devotion her eldest boy attended her sick bed,--"he sat up whole nights
with her in a great chair, would suffer nobody to give her medicine, or
even cook her food, but himself, and read novels to her in her intervals
of ease,"--and how bitterly he mourned for her when she was gone,--"he
gave way to such impassioned and prolonged grief (hiding himself in a nook
under the master's desk) as awakened the liveliest pity and sympathy in
all who saw him." In the July following, Mrs Jennings, being desirous to
make the best provision she could for her orphan grand-children, 'in
consideration of the natural love and affection which she had for them,'
executed a deed putting them under the care of two guardians, to whom she
made over, to be held in trust for their benefit from the date of the
instrument, the chief part of the property which she derived from her late
husband under his will[7]. The guardians were Mr Rowland Sandell,
merchant, and Mr Richard Abbey, a wholesale tea-dealer in Pancras Lane.
Mrs Jennings survived the execution of this deed more than four years[8],
but Mr Abbey, with the consent of his co-trustee, seems at once to have
taken up all the responsibilities of the trust. Under his authority John
Keats was withdrawn from school at the close of this same year 1810, when
he was just fifteen, and made to put on harness for the practical work of
life. With no opposition, so far as we learn, on his own part, he was
bound apprentice for a term of five years to a surgeon at Edmonton named
Hammond. The only picture we have of him in this capacity has been left by
R. H. Horne, the author of _Orion_, who came as a small boy to the Enfield
school just after Keats had left it. One day in winter Mr Hammond had
driven over to attend the school, and Keats with him. Keats was standing
with his head sunk in a brown study, holding the horse, when some of the
boys, who knew his school reputation for pugnacity, dared Horne to throw a
snowball at him; which Horne did, hitting Keats in the back, and then
taking headlong to his heels, to his surprise got off scot free[9]. Keats
during his apprenticeship used on his own account to be often to and fro
between the Edmonton surgery and the Enfield school. His newly awakened
passion for the pleasures of literature and the imagination was not to be
stifled, and whenever he could spare time from his work, he plunged back
into his school occupations of reading and translating. He finished at
this time his translation of the Æneid, and was in the habit of walking
over to Enfield once a week or oftener, to see his friend Cowden Clarke,
and to exchange books and 'travel in the realms of gold' with him. In
summer weather the two would sit in a shady arbour in the old school
garden, the elder reading poetry to the younger, and enjoying his looks
and exclamations of enthusiasm. On a momentous day for Keats, Cowden
Clarke introduced him for the first time to Spenser, reading him the
_Epithalamium_ in the afternoon, and lending him the _Faerie Queene_ to
take away the same evening. It has been said, and truly, that no one who
has not had the good fortune to be attracted to that poem in boyhood can
ever completely enjoy it. The maturer student, appreciate as he may its
inexhaustible beauties and noble temper, can hardly fail to be in some
degree put out by its arbitrary forms of rhyme and diction, and wearied by
its melodious redundance: he will perceive the perplexity and
discontinuousness of the allegory, and the absence of real and breathing
humanity, even the failure, at times, of clearness of vision and strength
of grasp, amidst all that luxuriance of decorative and symbolic invention,
and prodigality of romantic incident and detail. It is otherwise with the
uncritical faculties and greedy apprehension of boyhood. For them there is
no poetical revelation like the _Faerie Queene_, no pleasure equal to that
of floating for the first time along that ever-buoyant stream of verse, by
those shores and forests of enchantment, glades and wildernesses alive
with glancing figures of knight and lady, oppressor and champion, mage and
Saracen,--with masque and combat, pursuit and rescue, the chivalrous
shapes and hazards of the woodland, and beauty triumphant or in distress.
Through the new world thus opened to him Keats went ranging with delight:
'ramping' is Cowden Clarke's word: he shewed moreover his own instinct for
the poetical art by fastening with critical enthusiasm on epithets of
special felicity or power. For instance, says his friend, "he hoisted
himself up, and looked burly and dominant, as he said, 'What an image that
is--_sea-shouldering whales_!'" Spenser has been often proved not only a
great awakener of the love of poetry in youth, but a great fertilizer of
the germs of original poetical power where they exist; and Charles Brown,
the most intimate friend of Keats during two later years of his life,
states positively that it was to the inspiration of the _Faerie Queene_
that his first notion of attempting to write was due. "Though born to be a
poet, he was ignorant of his birthright until he had completed his
eighteenth year. It was the _Faerie Queene_ that awakened his genius. In
Spenser's fairy land he was enchanted, breathed in a new world, and became
another being; till, enamoured of the stanza, he attempted to imitate it,
and succeeded. This account of the sudden development of his poetic powers
I first received from his brothers, and afterwards from himself. This,
his earliest attempt, the 'Imitation of Spenser,' is in his first volume
of poems, and it is peculiarly interesting to those acquainted with his
history[10]." Cowden Clarke places the attempt two years earlier, but his
memory for dates was, as he owns, the vaguest, and we may fairly assume
him to have been mistaken.

After he had thus first become conscious within himself of the impulse of
poetical composition, Keats went on writing occasional sonnets and other
verses: secretly and shyly at first like all young poets: at least it was
not until two years later, in the spring of 1815, that he showed anything
he had written to his friend and confidant, Cowden Clarke. In the meantime
a change had taken place in his way of life. In the summer or autumn of
1814, more than a year before the expiration of his term of
apprenticeship, he had quarrelled with Mr Hammond and left him. The cause
of their quarrel is not known, and Keats's own single allusion to it is
when once afterwards, speaking of the periodical change and renewal of the
bodily tissues, he says "seven years ago it was not this hand which
clenched itself at Hammond." It seems unlikely that the cause was any
neglect of duty on the part of the poet-apprentice, who was not devoid of
thoroughness and resolution in the performance even of uncongenial tasks.
At all events Mr Hammond allowed the indentures to be cancelled, and
Keats, being now nearly nineteen years of age, went to live in London, and
continue the study of his profession as a student at the hospitals (then
for teaching purposes united) of St Thomas's and Guy's. For the first
winter and spring after leaving Edmonton he lodged alone at 8, Dean
Street, Borough, and then for about a year, in company with some
fellow-students, over a tallow-chandler's shop in St Thomas's Street.
Thence he went in the summer of 1816 to join his brothers in lodgings in
the Poultry, over a passage leading to the Queen's Head tavern. In the
spring of 1817 they all three moved for a short time to 76, Cheapside.
Between these several addresses in London Keats spent a period of about
two years and a half, from the date (which is not precisely fixed) of his
leaving Edmonton in 1814 until April, 1817.

It was in this interval, from his nineteenth to his twenty-second year,
that Keats gave way gradually to his growing passion for poetry. At first
he seems to have worked steadily enough along the lines which others had
marked out for him. His chief reputation, indeed, among his fellow
students was that of a 'cheerful, crotchety rhymester,' much given to
scribbling doggrel verses in his friends' note-books[11]. But I have
before me the MS. book in which he took down his own notes of a course, or
at least the beginning of a course, of lectures on anatomy; and they are
not those of a lax or inaccurate student. The only signs of a wandering
mind occur on the margins of one or two pages, in the shape of sketches
(rather prettily touched) of pansies and other flowers: but the notes
themselves are both full and close as far as they go. Poetry had indeed
already become Keats's chief interest, but it is clear at the same time
that he attended the hospitals and did his work regularly, acquiring a
fairly solid knowledge, both theoretical and practical, of the rudiments
of medical and surgical science, so that he was always afterwards able to
speak on such subjects with a certain mastery. On the 25th of July, 1816,
he passed with credit his examination as licentiate at Apothecaries' Hall.
He was appointed a dresser at Guy's under Mr Lucas on the 3rd of March,
1816, and the operations which he performed or assisted in are said to
have proved him no bungler. But his heart was not in the work. Its
scientific part he could not feel to be a satisfying occupation for his
thoughts: he knew nothing of that passion of philosophical curiosity in
the mechanism and mysteries of the human frame which by turns attracted
Coleridge and Shelley toward the study of medicine. The practical
responsibilities of the profession at the same time weighed upon him, and
he was conscious of a kind of absent uneasy wonder at his own skill.
Voices and visions that he could not resist were luring his spirit along
other paths, and once when Cowden Clarke asked him about his prospects and
feelings in regard to his profession, he frankly declared his own sense of
his unfitness for it; with reasons such as this, that "the other day,
during the lecture, there came a sunbeam into the room, and with it a
whole troop of creatures floating in the ray; and I was off with them to
Oberon and fairy-land." "My last operation," he once told Brown, "was the
opening of a man's temporal artery. I did it with the utmost nicety, but
reflecting on what passed through my mind at the time, my dexterity seemed
a miracle, and I never took up the lancet again."

Keats at the same time was forming intimacies with other young men of
literary tastes and occupations. His verses were beginning to be no longer
written with a boy's secrecy, but freely addressed to and passed round
among his friends; some of them attracted the notice and warm approval of
writers of acknowledged mark and standing; and with their encouragement he
had about the time of his coming of age (that is in the winter of 1816-17)
conceived the purpose of devoting himself to a literary life. We are not
told what measure of opposition he encountered on the point from Mr Abbey,
though there is evidence that he encountered some[12]. Probably that
gentleman regarded the poetical aspirations of his ward as mere symptoms
of a boyish fever which experience would quickly cure. There was always a
certain lack of cordiality in his relations with the three brothers as
they grew up. He gave places in his counting-house successively to George
and Tom as they left school, but they both quitted him after a while;
George, who had his full share of the family pride, on account of slights
experienced or imagined at the hands of a junior partner; Tom in
consequence of a settled infirmity of health which early disabled him for
the practical work of life. Mr Abbey continued to manage the money matters
of the Keats family,--unskilfully enough as will appear,--and to do his
duty by them as he understood it. Between him and John Keats there was
never any formal quarrel. But that young brilliant spirit could hardly
have expected a responsible tea-dealer's approval when he yielded himself
to the influences now to be described.




CHAPTER II.

    Particulars of Early Life in London--Friendships and First
    Poems--Henry Stephens--Felton Mathew--Cowden Clarke--Leigh Hunt: his
    literary and personal influence--John Hamilton Reynolds--James
    Rice--Cornelius Webb--Shelley--Haydon--Joseph Severn--Charles
    Wells--Personal characteristics--Determination to publish. [1814-April
    1817.]


When Keats moved from Dean Street to St Thomas's Street in the summer of
1815, he at first occupied a joint sitting-room with two senior students,
to the care of one of whom he had been recommended by Astley Cooper[13].
When they left he arranged to live in the same house with two other
students, of his own age, named George Wilson Mackereth and Henry
Stephens. The latter, who was afterwards a physician of repute near St
Albans, and later at Finchley, has left some interesting reminiscences of
the time[14]. "He attended lectures," says Mr Stephens of Keats, "and went
through the usual routine, but he had no desire to excel in that
pursuit.... Poetry was to his mind the zenith of all his aspirations--the
only thing worthy the attention of superior minds--so he thought--all
other pursuits were mean and tame.... It may readily be imagined that
this feeling was accompanied by a good deal of pride and some conceit, and
that amongst mere medical students he would walk and talk as one of the
gods might be supposed to do when mingling with mortals." On the whole, it
seems, 'little Keats' was popular among his fellow-students, although
subject to occasional teasing on account of his pride, his poetry, and
even his birth as the son of a stable-keeper. Mr Stephens goes on to tell
how he himself and a student of St Bartholomew's, a merry fellow called
Newmarch, having some tincture of poetry, were singled out as companions
by Keats, with whom they used to discuss and compare verses, Keats taking
always the tone of authority, and generally disagreeing with their tastes.
He despised Pope, and admired Byron, but delighted especially in Spenser,
caring more in poetry for the beauty of imagery, description, and simile,
than for the interest of action or passion. Newmarch used sometimes to
laugh at Keats and his flights,--to the indignation of his brothers, who
came often to see him, and treated him as a person to be exalted, and
destined to exalt the family name. Questions of poetry apart, continues Mr
Stephens, he was habitually gentle and pleasant, and in his life steady
and well-behaved--"his absolute devotion to poetry prevented his having
any other taste or indulging in any vice." Another companion of Keats's
early London days, who sympathized with his literary tastes, was a certain
George Felton Mathew, the son of a tradesman whose family showed the young
medical student some hospitality. "Keats and I," wrote in 1848 Mr
Mathew,--then a supernumerary official on the Poor-Law Board, struggling
meekly under the combined strain of a precarious income, a family of
twelve children, and a turn for the interpretation of prophecy,--"Keats
and I, though about the same age, and both inclined to literature, were in
many respects as different as two individuals could be. He enjoyed good
health--a fine flow of animal spirits--was fond of company--could amuse
himself admirably with the frivolities of life--and had great confidence
in himself. I, on the other hand, was languid and melancholy--fond of
repose--thoughtful beyond my years--and diffident to the last degree....
He was of the sceptical and republican school--an advocate for the
innovations which were making progress in his time--a faultfinder with
everything established. I on the other hand hated controversy and
dispute--dreaded discord and disorder"[15]--and Keats, our good Mr
Timorous farther testifies, was very kind and amiable, always ready to
apologize for shocking him. As to his poetical predilections, the
impression left on Mr Mathew quite corresponds with that recorded by Mr
Stephens:--"he admired more the external decorations than felt the deep
emotions of the Muse. He delighted in leading you through the mazes of
elaborate description, but was less conscious of the sublime and the
pathetic. He used to spend many evenings in reading to me, but I never
observed the tears nor the broken voice which are indicative of extreme
sensibility."

The exact order and chronology of Keats's own first efforts in poetry it
is difficult to trace. They were certainly neither precocious nor
particularly promising. The circumstantial account of Brown above quoted
compels us to regard the lines _In Imitation of Spenser_ as the earliest
of all, and as written at Edmonton about the end of 1813 or beginning of
1814. They are correct and melodious, and contain few of those archaic or
experimental eccentricities of diction which we shall find abounding a
little later in Keats's work. Although, indeed, the poets whom Keats loved
the best both first and last were those of the Elizabethan age, it is
clear that his own earliest verses were modelled timidly on the work of
writers nearer his own time. His professedly Spenserian lines resemble not
so much Spenser as later writers who had written in his measure, and of
these not the latest, Byron[16], but rather such milder minstrels as
Shenstone, Thomson, and Beattie, or most of all perhaps the sentimental
Irish poetess Mrs Tighe; whose _Psyche_ had become very popular since her
death, and by its richness of imagery, and flowing and musical
versification, takes a place, now too little recognised, among the pieces
preluding the romantic movement of the time. That Keats was familiar with
this lady's work is proved by his allusion to it in the lines, themselves
very youthfully turned in the tripping manner of Tom Moore, which he
addressed about this time to some ladies who had sent him a present of a
shell. His two elegiac stanzas _On Death_, assigned by George Keats to the
year 1814, are quite in an eighteenth-century style and vein of
moralizing. Equally so is the address _To Hope_ of February 1815, with its
'relentless fair' and its personified abstractions, 'fair Cheerfulness,'
'Disappointment, parent of Despair,' 'that fiend Despondence,' and the
rest. And once more, in the ode _To Apollo_ of the same date, the voice
with which this young singer celebrates his Elizabethan masters is an
echo not of their own voice but rather of Gray's:--

  "Thou biddest Shakspeare wave his hand,
    And quickly forward spring
  The Passions--a terrific band--
    And each vibrates the string
  That with its tyrant temper best accords,
  While from their Master's lips pour forth the inspiring words.
  A silver trumpet Spenser blows,
    And, as its martial notes to silence flee,
  From a virgin chorus flows
    A hymn in praise of spotless Chastity.
  'Tis still! Wild warblings from the Æolian lyre
  Enchantment softly breathe, and tremblingly expire."

The pieces above cited are all among the earliest of Keats's work, written
either at Edmonton or during the first year of his life in London. To the
same class no doubt belongs the inexpert and boyish, almost girlish,
sentimental sonnet _To Byron_, and probably that also, which is but a
degree better, _To Chatterton_ (both only posthumously printed). The more
firmly handled but still mediocre sonnet on Leigh Hunt's release from
prison brings us again to a fixed date and a recorded occasion in the
young poet's life. It was on either the 2nd or the 3rd of February, 1815,
that the brothers Hunt were discharged after serving out the term of
imprisonment to which they had been condemned on the charge of libelling
the Prince Regent two years before. Young Cowden Clarke, like so many
other friends of letters and of liberty, had gone to offer his respects to
Leigh Hunt in Surrey jail; and the acquaintance thus begun had warmed
quickly into friendship. Within a few days of Hunt's release, Clarke
walked in from Enfield to call on him (presumably at the lodging he
occupied at this time in the Edgware Road). On his return Clarke met
Keats, who walked part of the way home with him, and as they parted, says
Clarke, "he turned and gave me the sonnet entitled _Written on the day
that Mr Leigh Hunt left prison_. This I feel to be the first proof I had
received of his having committed himself in verse; and how clearly do I
recollect the conscious look and hesitation with which he offered it!
There are some momentary glances by beloved friends that fade only with
life."

Not long afterwards Cowden Clarke left Enfield, and came to settle in
London. Keats found him out in his lodgings at Clerkenwell, and the two
were soon meeting as often and reading together as eagerly as ever. One of
the first books they attacked was a borrowed folio copy of Chapman's
Homer. After a night's enthusiastic study, Clarke found when he came down
to breakfast the next morning, that Keats, who had only left him in the
small hours, had already had time to compose and send him from the Borough
the sonnet, now so famous as to be almost hackneyed, _On First Looking
into Chapman's Homer_;--

  "Much have I travell'd in the realms of gold,
    And many goodly states and kingdoms seen;
    Round many Western islands have I been
  Which bards in fealty to Apollo hold.
  Oft of one wide expanse had I been told,
    That deep-brow'd Homer ruled as his demesne:
    Yet did I never breathe its pure serene
  Till I heard Chapman speak out loud and bold:
  Then felt I like some watcher of the skies
    When a new planet swims into his ken;
  Or like stout Cortez when with eagle eyes
    He stared at the Pacific--and all his men
  Look'd at each other with a wild surmise--
    Silent, upon a peak in Darien."

The date of the incident cannot be precisely fixed; but it was when nights
were short in the summer of 1815. The seventh line of the sonnet is an
afterthought: in the original copy sent to Cowden Clarke it stood more
baldly, 'Yet could I never tell what men might mean.' Keats here for the
first time approves himself a poet indeed. The concluding sestet is almost
unsurpassed, nor can there be a finer instance of the alchemy of genius
than the image of the explorer, wherein a stray reminiscence of schoolboy
reading (with a mistake, it seems, as to the name, which should be Balboa
and not Cortez, but what does it matter?) is converted into the perfection
of appropriate poetry.

One of the next services which the ever zealous and affectionate Cowden
Clarke did his young friend was to make him personally known to Leigh
Hunt. The acquaintance carried with it in the sequel some disadvantages
and even penalties, but at first was a source of unmixed encouragement and
pleasure. It is impossible rightly to understand the career of Keats if we
fail to realise the various modes in which it was affected by his
intercourse with Hunt. The latter was the elder of the two by eleven
years. He was the son, by marriage with an American wife, of an eloquent
and elegant, self-indulgent and thriftless fashionable preacher of West
Indian origin, who had chiefly exercised his vocation in the northern
suburbs of London. Leigh Hunt was brought up at Christ's Hospital, about a
dozen years later than Lamb and Coleridge, and gained at sixteen some
slight degree of precocious literary reputation with a volume of juvenile
poems. A few years later he came into notice as a theatrical critic, being
then a clerk in the War Office; an occupation which he abandoned at
twenty-four (in 1808) in order to join his brother John Hunt in the
conduct of the _Examiner_ newspaper. For five years the managers of that
journal helped to fight the losing battle of liberalism, in those days of
Eldon and of Castlereagh, with a dexterous brisk audacity, and a perfect
sincerity, if not profoundness, of conviction. At last they were caught
tripping, and condemned to two years' imprisonment for strictures ruled
libellous, and really stinging as well as just, on the character and
person of the Prince Regent. Leigh Hunt bore himself in his captivity with
cheerful fortitude, and issued from it a sort of hero. Liberal statesmen,
philosophers, and writers pressed to offer him their sympathy and society
in prison, and his engaging presence, and affluence of genial
conversation, charmed all who were brought in contact with him. Tall,
straight, slender, and vivacious, with curly black hair, bright coal-black
eyes, and 'nose of taste,' Leigh Hunt was ever one of the most winning of
companions, full of kindly smiles and jests, of reading, gaiety, and
ideas, with an infinity of pleasant things to say of his own, yet the most
sympathetic and deferential of listeners. If in some matters he was far
too easy, and especially in that of money obligations, which he shrank
neither from receiving nor conferring,--only circumstances made him nearly
always a receiver,--still men of sterner fibre than Hunt have more lightly
abandoned graver convictions than his, and been far less ready to suffer
for what they believed. Liberals could not but contrast his smiling
steadfastness under persecution with the apostasy, as in the heat of the
hour they considered it, of Southey, Wordsworth, and Coleridge. In
domestic life no man was more amiable and devoted under difficulties; and
none was better loved by his friends, or requited them, so far as the
depth of his nature went, with a truer warmth and loyalty. His literary
industry was incessant, hardly second to that of Southey himself. He had
the liveliest faculty of enjoyment, coupled with a singular quickness of
intellectual apprehension for the points and qualities of what he enjoyed;
and for the gentler pleasures, graces, and luxuries (to use a word he
loved) of literature, he is the most accomplished of guides and
interpreters. His manner in criticism has at its best an easy penetration,
and flowing unobtrusive felicity, most remote from those faults to which
Coleridge and De Quincey, with their more philosophic powers and method,
were subject, the faults of pedantry and effort. The infirmity of Leigh
Hunt's style is of an opposite kind. "Incomparable," according to Lamb's
well-known phrase, "as a fire-side companion," it was his misfortune to
carry too much of the fire-side tone into literature, and to affect both
in prose and verse, but much more in the latter, an air of chatty
familiarity and ease which passes too easily into Cockney pertness.

A combination of accidents, political, personal, and literary, caused this
writer of amiable memory and second-rate powers to exercise, about the
time of which we are writing, a determining influence both on the work and
the fortunes of stronger men. And first of his influence on their work. He
was as enthusiastic a student of 'our earlier and nobler school of poetry'
as Coleridge or Lamb, and though he had more appreciation than they of the
characteristic excellences of the 'French school,' the school of polished
artifice and restraint which had come in since Dryden, he was not less
bent on its overthrow, and on the return of English poetry to the paths of
nature and freedom. But he had his own conception of the manner in which
this return should be effected. He did not admit that Wordsworth with his
rustic simplicities and his recluse philosophy had solved the problem. "It
was his intention," he wrote in prison, "by the beginning of next year to
bring out a piece of some length ... in which he would attempt to reduce
to practice his own ideas of what is natural in style, and of the various
and legitimate harmony of the English heroic." The result of this
intention was the _Story of Rimini_, begun before his prosecution and
published a year after his release, in February or March, 1816. "With the
endeavour," so he repeated himself in the preface, "to recur to a freer
spirit of versification, I have joined one of still greater
importance,--that of having a free and idiomatic cast of language."

In versification Hunt's aim was to bring back into use the earlier form of
the rhymed English decasyllabic or 'heroic' couplet. The innovating poets
of the time had abandoned this form of verse (Wordsworth and Coleridge
using it only in their earliest efforts, before 1796); while the others
who still employed it, as Campbell, Rogers, Crabbe, and Byron, adhered,
each in his manner, to the isolated couplet and hammering rhymes with
which the English ear had been for more than a century exclusively
familiar. The two contrasted systems of handling the measure may best be
understood if we compare the rhythm of a poem written in it to one of
those designs in hangings or wall-papers which are made up of two
different patterns in combination: a rigid or geometrical ground pattern,
with a second, flowing or free pattern winding in and out of it. The
regular or ground-pattern, dividing the field into even spaces, will stand
for the fixed or strictly metrical divisions of the verse into equal
pairs of rhyming lines; while the flowing or free pattern stands for its
other divisions--dependent not on metre but on the sense--into clauses and
periods of variable length and structure. Under the older system of
versification the sentence or period had been allowed to follow its own
laws, with a movement untrammelled by that of the metre; and the beauty of
the result depended upon the skill and feeling with which this free
element of the pattern was made to play about and interweave itself with
the fixed element, the flow and divisions of the sentence now crossing and
now coinciding with those of the metre, the sense now drawing attention to
the rhyme and now withholding it. For examples of this system and of its
charm we have only to turn at random to Chaucer:--

  "I-clothed was sche fresh for to devyse.
  Hir yelwe hair was browded in a tresse,
  Byhynde her bak, a yerdë long, I gesse,
  And in the garden as the sonne upriste
  She walketh up and down, and as hir liste
  She gathereth floures, party white and reede,
  To make a sotil garland for here heede,
  And as an aungel hevenlyche sche song."

Chaucer's conception of the measure prevails throughout the Elizabethan
age, but not exclusively or uniformly. Some poets are more inobservant of
the metrical division than he, and keep the movement of their periods as
independent of it as possible; closing a sentence anywhere rather than
with the close of the couplet, and making use constantly of the
_enjambement_, or way of letting the sense flow over from one line to
another, without pause or emphasis on the rhyme-word. Others show an
opposite tendency, especially in epigrammatic or sententious passages, to
clip their sentences to the pattern of the metre, fitting single
propositions into single lines or couplets, and letting the stress fall
regularly on the rhyme. This principle gradually gained ground during the
seventeenth century, as every one knows, and prevails strongly in the work
of Dryden. But Dryden has two methods which he freely employs for varying
the monotony of his couplets: in serious narrative or didactic verse, the
use of the triplet and the Alexandrine, thus:--

  "Full bowls of wine, of honey, milk, and blood
  Were poured upon the pile of burning wood,
  And hissing flames receive, and hungry lick the food.
  Then thrice the mounted squadrons ride around
  The fire, and Arcite's name they thrice resound:
  'Hail and farewell,' they shouted thrice amain,
  Thrice facing to the left, and thrice they turned again--:"

and in lively colloquial verse the use, not uncommon also with the
Elizabethans, of disyllabic rhymes:--

  "I come, kind gentlemen, strange news to tell ye;
  I am the ghost of poor departed Nelly.
  Sweet ladies, be not frighted; I'll be civil;
  I'm what I was, a little harmless devil."

In the hands of Pope, the poetical legislator of the following century,
these expedients are discarded, and the fixed and purely metrical element
in the design is suffered to regulate and control the other element
entirely. The sentence-structure loses its freedom: and periods and
clauses, instead of being allowed to develope themselves at their ease,
are compelled mechanically to coincide with and repeat the metrical
divisions of the verse. To take a famous instance, and from a passage not
sententious, but fanciful and discursive:--

  "Some in the fields of purest æther play,
  And bask and whiten in the blaze of day.
  Some guide the course of wand'ring orbs on high,
  Or roll the planets through the boundless sky.
  Some less refined, beneath the moon's pale light
  Pursue the stars that shoot across the night,
  Or seek the mists in grosser air below,
  Or dip their pinions in the painted bow,
  Or brew fierce tempests on the wintry main,
  Or o'er the glebe distil the kindly rain."

Leigh Hunt's theory was that Pope, with all his skill, had spoiled instead
of perfecting his instrument, and that the last true master of the heroic
couplet had been Dryden, on whom the verse of _Rimini_ is avowedly
modelled. The result is an odd blending of the grave and the colloquial
cadences of Dryden, without his characteristic nerve and energy in
either:--

  "The prince, at this, would bend on her an eye
  Cordial enough, and kiss her tenderly;
  Nor, to say truly, was he slow in common
  To accept the attentions of this lovely woman,
  But the meantime he took no generous pains,
  By mutual pleasing, to secure his gains;
  He entered not, in turn, in her delights,
  Her books, her flowers, her taste for rural sights;
  Nay, scarcely her sweet singing minded he
  Unless his pride was roused by company;
  Or when to please him, after martial play,
  She strained her lute to some old fiery lay
  Of fierce Orlando, or of Ferumbras,
  Or Ryan's cloak, or how by the red grass
  In battle you might know where Richard was."

It is usually said that to the example thus set by Leigh Hunt in _Rimini_
is due the rhythmical form alike of _Endymion_ and _Epipsychidion_, of
Keats's _Epistles_ to his friends and Shelley's _Letter to Maria
Gisborne_. Certainly the _Epistles_ of Keats, both as to sentiment and
rhythm, are very much in Hunt's manner. But the earliest of them, that to
G. F. Mathew, is dated Nov. 1815: when _Rimini_ was not yet published, and
when it appears Keats did not yet know Hunt personally. He may indeed have
known his poem in MS., through Clarke or others. Or the likeness of his
work to Hunt's may have arisen independently: as to style, from a natural
affinity of feeling: and as to rhythm, from a familiarity with the
disyllabic rhyme and the 'overflow' as used by some of the Elizabethan
writers, particularly by Spenser in _Mother Hubbard's Tale_ and by Browne
in _Britannia's Pastorals_. At all events the appearance of _Rimini_
tended unquestionably to encourage and confirm him in his practice.

As to Hunt's success with his 'ideas of what is natural in style,' and his
'free and idiomatic cast of language' to supersede the styles alike of
Pope and Wordsworth, the specimen of his which we have given is perhaps
enough. The taste that guided him so well in appreciating the works of
others deserted him often in original composition, but nowhere so
completely as in _Rimini_. The piece indeed is not without agreeable
passages of picturesque colour and description, but for the rest, the
pleasant creature does but exaggerate in this poem the chief foible of his
prose, redoubling his vivacious airs where they are least in place, and
handling the great passions of the theme with a tea-party manner and
vocabulary that are intolerable. Contemporaries, welcoming as a relief any
departure from the outworn poetical conventions of the eighteenth century,
found, indeed, something to praise in Leigh Hunt's _Rimini_: and ladies
are said to have wept over the sorrows of the hero and heroine: but what,
one can only ask, must be the sensibilities of the human being who can
endure to hear the story of Paolo and Francesca--Dante's Paolo and
Francesca--diluted through four cantos in a style like this?--

  "What need I tell of lovely lips and eyes,
  A clipsome waist, and bosom's balmy rise?--"

  "How charming, would he think, to see her here,
  How heightened then, and perfect would appear
  The two divinest things the world has got,
  A lovely woman in a rural spot."

When Keats and Shelley, with their immeasurably finer poetical gifts and
instincts, successively followed Leigh Hunt in the attempt to add a
familiar lenity of style to variety of movement in this metre, Shelley, it
need not be said, was in no danger of falling into any such underbred
strain as this: but Keats at first falls, or is near falling, into it more
than once.

Next as to the influence which Leigh Hunt involuntarily exercised on his
friends' fortunes and their estimation by the world. We have seen how he
found himself, in prison and for some time after his release, a kind of
political hero on the liberal side, a part for which nature had by no
means fitted him. This was in itself enough to mark him out as a special
butt for Tory vengeance: yet that vengeance would hardly have been so
inveterate as it was but for other secondary causes. During his
imprisonment Leigh Hunt had reprinted from the _Reflector_, with notes and
additions, an airily presumptuous trifle in verse called the _Feast of the
Poets_, which he had written about two years before. In it Apollo is
represented as convoking the contemporary British poets, or pretenders to
the poetical title, to a session, or rather to a supper. Some of those who
present themselves the god rejects with scorn, others he cordially
welcomes, others he admits with reserve and admonition. Moore and
Campbell fare the best; Southey and Scott are accepted but with reproof,
Coleridge and Wordsworth chidden and dismissed. The criticisms are not
more short-sighted than those even of just and able men commonly are on
their contemporaries. The bitterness of the 'Lost Leader' feeling to which
we have referred accounts for much of Hunt's disparagement of the Lake
writers, while in common with all liberals he was prejudiced against Scott
as a conspicuous high Tory and friend to kings. But he quite acknowledged
the genius, while he condemned the defection, and also what he thought the
poetical perversities, of Wordsworth. His treatment of Scott, on the other
hand, is idly flippant and patronising. Now it so happened that of the two
champions who were soon after to wield, one the bludgeon, and the other
the dagger, of Tory criticism in Edinburgh,--I mean Wilson and
Lockhart,--Wilson was the cordial friend and admirer of Wordsworth, and
Lockhart a man of many hatreds but one great devotion, and that devotion
was to Scott. Hence a part at least of the peculiar and as it might seem
paradoxical rancour with which the gentle Hunt, and Keats as his friend
and supposed follower, were by-and-bye to be persecuted in _Blackwood_.

To go back to the point at which Hunt and Keats first became known to each
other. Cowden Clarke began by carrying up to Hunt, who had now moved from
the Edgware Road to a cottage in the Vale of Health at Hampstead, a few of
Keats's poems in manuscript. Horace Smith was with Hunt when the young
poet's work was shown him. Both were eager in its praises, and in
questions concerning the person and character of the author. Cowden Clarke
at Hunt's request brought Keats to call on him soon afterwards, and has
left a vivid account of their pleasant welcome and conversation. The
introduction seems to have taken place early in the spring of 1816[17].
Keats immediately afterwards became intimate in the Hampstead household;
and for the next year or two Hunt's was the strongest intellectual
influence to which he was subject. So far as opinions were concerned,
those of Keats had already, as we have seen, been partly formed in boyhood
by Leigh Hunt's writings in the _Examiner_. Hunt was a confirmed sceptic
as to established creeds, and supplied their place with a private gospel
of cheerfulness, or system of sentimental optimism, inspired partly by his
own sunny temperament, and partly by the hopeful doctrines of
eighteenth-century philosophy in France. Keats shared the natural sympathy
of generous youth for Hunt's liberal and optimistic view of things, and he
had a mind naturally unapt for dogma:--ready to entertain and appreciate
any set of ideas according as his imagination recognised their beauty or
power, he could never wed himself to any as representing ultimate truth.
In matters of poetic feeling and fancy Keats and Hunt had not a little in
common. Both alike were given to 'luxuriating' somewhat effusively and
fondly over the 'deliciousness' of whatever they liked in art, books, or
nature. To the every-day pleasures of summer and the English fields Hunt
brought in a lower degree the same alertness of perception, and acuteness
of sensuous and imaginative enjoyment, which in Keats were intense beyond
parallel. In his lighter and shallower way Hunt also felt with Keats the
undying charm of classic fable, and was scholar enough to produce about
this time some agreeable translations of the Sicilian pastorals, and some,
less adequate, of Homer. The poets Hunt loved best were Ariosto and the
other Italian masters of the chivalrous-fanciful epic style; and in
English he was devoted to Keats's own favourite Spenser.

The name of Spenser is often coupled with that of 'Libertas,' 'the lov'd
Libertas,' meaning Leigh Hunt, in the verses written by Keats at this
time. He attempts, in some of these verses, to embody the spirit of the
_Faerie Queene_ in the metre of _Rimini_, and in others to express in the
same form the pleasures of nature as he felt them in straying about the
beautiful, then rural Hampstead woods and slopes. In the summer of 1816 he
seems to have spent a good deal of his time at the Vale of Health, where a
bed was made up for him in the library. In one poem he dilates at length
on the associations suggested by the busts and knick-knacks in the room;
and the sonnet beginning, 'Keen, fitful gusts are whispering here and
there', records pleasantly his musings as he walked home from his friend's
house one night in winter. We find him presenting Hunt with a crown of
ivy, and receiving a set of sonnets from him in return. Or they would
challenge each other to the composition of rival pieces on a chosen theme.
Cowden Clarke, in describing one such occasion in December 1816, when they
each wrote to time a sonnet _on the Grasshopper and Cricket_, has left us
a pleasant picture of their relations:--

    "The event of the after scrutiny was one of many such occurrences
    which have riveted the memory of Leigh Hunt in my affectionate regard
    and admiration for unaffected generosity and perfectly unpretentious
    encouragement. His sincere look of pleasure at the first line:--

        'The poetry of earth is never dead.'

    "Such a prosperous opening!" he said; and when he came to the tenth
    and eleventh lines:--

        'On a lone winter morning, when the frost
        Hath wrought a silence'--

    "Ah that's perfect! Bravo Keats!" And then he went on in a dilatation
    on the dumbness of Nature during the season's suspension and
    torpidity."

Through Leigh Hunt Keats was before long introduced to a number of
congenial spirits. Among them he attached himself especially to one John
Hamilton Reynolds, a poetic aspirant who, though a year younger than
himself, had preceded him with his first literary venture. Reynolds was
born at Shrewsbury, and his father settled afterwards in London, as
writing-master at the Blue Coat School. He lacked health and energy, but
has left the reputation of a brilliant playful wit, and the evidence of a
charming character and no slight literary talent. He held a clerkship in
an Insurance office, and lived in Little Britain with his family,
including three sisters with whom Keats was also intimate, and the eldest
of whom afterwards married Thomas Hood. His earliest poems show him
inspired feelingly enough with the new romance and nature sentiment of the
time. One, _Safie_, is an indifferent imitation of Byron in his then
fashionable Oriental vein: much better work appears in a volume published
in the year of Keats's death, and partly prompted by the writer's
relations with him. In a lighter strain, Reynolds wrote a musical
entertainment which was brought out in 1819 at what is now the Lyceum
theatre, and about the same time offended Wordsworth with an anticipatory
parody of _Peter Bell_, which Byron assumed to be the work of Moore. In
1820 he produced a spirited sketch in prose and verse purporting to
relate, under the name _Peter Corcoran_, the fortunes of an amateur of the
prize-ring; and a little later, in conjunction with Hood, the volume of
anonymous _Odes and Addresses to Eminent Persons_ which Coleridge on its
appearance declared confidently to be the work of Lamb. But Reynolds had
early given up the hope of living by literature, and accepted the offer of
an opening in business as a solicitor. In 1818 he inscribed a farewell
sonnet to the Muses in a copy of Shakspeare which he gave to Keats, and in
1821 he writes again,

                  "As time increases
  I give up drawling verse for drawing leases."

In point of fact Reynolds continued for years to contribute to the _London
Magazine_ and other reviews, and to work occasionally in conjunction with
Hood. But neither in literature nor law did he attain a position
commensurate with the promise of his youth. Starting level, at the time of
which we speak, with men who are now in the first rank of fame,--with
Keats and Shelley,--he died in 1852 as Clerk of the County at Newport,
Isle of Wight, and it is only in association with Keats that his name will
live. Not only was he one of the warmest friends Keats had, entertaining
from the first an enthusiastic admiration for his powers, as a sonnet
written early in their acquaintance proves[18], but also one of the
wisest, and by judicious advice more than once saved him from a mistake.
In connection with the name of Reynolds among Keats's associates must be
mentioned that of his inseparable friend James Rice, a young solicitor of
literary tastes and infinite jest, chronically ailing or worse in health,
but always, in Keats's words, "coming on his legs again like a cat"; ever
cheerful and willing in spite of his sufferings, and indefatigable in
good offices to those about him: "dear noble generous James Rice," records
Dilke,--"the best, and in his quaint way one of the wittiest and wisest
men I ever knew." Besides Reynolds, another and more insignificant rhyming
member of Hunt's set, when Keats first joined it, was one Cornelius Webb,
remembered now, if remembered at all, by _Blackwood's_ derisory quotation
of his lines on--

                                  "Keats,
  The Muses' son of promise, and what feats
  He yet may do"--

as well as by a disparaging allusion in one of Keats's own later letters.
He disappeared early from the circle, but not before he had caught enough
of its spirit to write sonnets and poetical addresses which might almost
be taken for the work of Hunt, or even for that of Keats himself in his
weak moments[19]. For some years afterwards Webb served as press-reader in
the printing-office of Messrs Clowes, being charged especially with the
revision of the _Quarterly_ proofs. Towards 1830--1840 he re-appeared in
literature, as Cornelius 'Webbe', author of the _Man about Town_ and other
volumes of cheerful gossipping Cockney essays, to which the _Quarterly_
critics extended a patronizing notice.

An acquaintance more interesting to posterity which Keats made a few
months later, at Leigh Hunt's, was that of Shelley, his senior by only
three years. During the harrowing period of Shelley's life which followed
the suicide of his first wife--when his principle of love a law to itself
had in action entailed so dire a consequence, and his obedience to his
own morality had brought him into such harsh collision with the
world's--the kindness and affection of Leigh Hunt were among his chief
consolations. After his marriage with Mary Godwin, he flitted often, alone
or with his wife, between Great Marlow and Hampstead, where Keats met him
early in the spring of 1817. "Keats," says Hunt, did not take to Shelley
as kindly as Shelley did to him, and adds the comment: "Keats, being a
little too sensitive on the score of his origin, felt inclined to see in
every man of birth a sort of natural enemy." "He was haughty, and had a
fierce hatred of rank," says Haydon in his unqualified way. Where his
pride had not been aroused by anticipation, Keats had a genius for
friendship, but towards Shelley we find him in fact maintaining a tone of
reserve, and even of something like moral and intellectual patronage: at
first, no doubt, by way of defence against the possibility of social or
material patronage on the other's part: but he should soon have learnt
better than to apprehend anything of the kind from one whose delicacy,
according to all evidence, was as perfect and unmistakeable as his
kindness. Of Shelley's kindness Keats had in the sequel sufficient proof:
in the meantime, until Shelley went abroad the following year, the two met
often at Hunt's without becoming really intimate. Pride and social
sensitiveness apart, we can imagine that a full understanding was not easy
between them, and that Keats, with his strong vein of every-day humanity,
sense, and humour, and his innate openness of mind, may well have been as
much repelled as attracted by the unearthly ways and accents of Shelley,
his passionate negation of the world's creeds and the world's law, and his
intense proselytizing ardour.

It was also at Hunt's house that Keats for the first time met by
pre-arrangement, in the beginning of November 1816, the painter Haydon,
whose influence soon became hardly second to that of Hunt himself. Haydon
was now thirty. He had lately been victorious in one of the two great
objects of his ambition, and had achieved a temporary semblance of victory
in the other. He had been mainly instrumental in getting the pre-eminence
of the Elgin marbles among the works of the sculptor's art acknowledged in
the teeth of hostile cliques, and their acquisition for the nation
secured. This is Haydon's chief real title to the regard of posterity. His
other and life-long, half insane endeavour was to persuade the world to
take him at his own estimate, as the man chosen by Providence to add the
crown of heroic painting to the other glories of his country. His
indomitable high-flaming energy and industry, his strenuous self-reliance,
his eloquence, vehemence, and social gifts, the clamour of his
self-assertion and of his fierce oppugnancy against the academic powers,
even his unabashed claims for support on friends, patrons, and society at
large, had won for him much convinced or half-convinced attention and
encouragement, both in the world of art and letters and in that of
dilettantism and fashion. His first two great pictures, 'Dentatus' and
'Macbeth', had been dubiously received; his last, the 'Judgment of
Solomon', with acclamation; he was now busy on one more ambitious than
all, 'Christ's Entry into Jerusalem,' and while as usual sunk deep in
debt, was perfectly confident of glory. Vain confidence--for he was in
truth a man whom nature had endowed, as if maliciously, with one part of
the gifts of genius and not the other. Its energy and voluntary power he
possessed completely, and no man has ever lived at a more genuinely
exalted pitch of feeling and aspiration. "Never," wrote he about this
time, "have I had such irresistible and perpetual urgings of future
greatness. I have been like a man with air-balloons under his armpits, and
ether in his soul. While I was painting, walking, or thinking, beaming
flashes of energy followed and impressed me.... They came over me, and
shot across me, and shook me, till I lifted up my heart and thanked God."
But for all his sensations and conviction of power, the other half of
genius, the half which resides not in energy and will, but in faculties
which it is the business of energy and will to apply, was denied to
Haydon: its vital gifts of choice and of creation, its magic power of
working on the materials offered it by experience, its felicity of touch
and insight, were not in him. Except for a stray note here and there, an
occasional bold conception, or a touch of craftsmanship caught from
greater men, the pictures with which he exultingly laid siege to
immortality belong, as posterity has justly felt, to the kingdom not of
true heroic art but of rodomontade. Even in drawing from the Elgin
marbles, Haydon fails almost wholly to express the beauties which he
enthusiastically perceived, and loses every distinction and every subtlety
of the original. Very much better is his account of them in words: as
indeed Haydon's chief intellectual power was as an observer, and his best
instrument the pen. Readers of his journals and correspondence know with
what fluent, effective, if often overcharged force and vividness of style
he can relate an experience or touch off a character. But in this, the
literary, form of expression also, as often as he flies higher, and tries
to become imaginative and impressive, we find only the same self-satisfied
void turgidity, and proof of a commonplace mind, as in his paintings.
Take for instance, in relation to Keats himself, Haydon's profound
admonition to him as follows:--"God bless you, my dear Keats! do not
despair; collect incident, study character, read Shakspere, and trust in
Providence, and you will do, you must:" or the following precious
expansion of an image in one of the poet's sonnets on the Elgin
marbles:--"I know not a finer image than the comparison of a poet unable
to express his high feelings to a sick eagle looking at the sky, where he
must have remembered his former towerings amid the blaze of dazzling
sunbeams, in the pure expanse of glittering clouds; now and then passing
angels, on heavenly errands, lying at the will of the wind with moveless
wings, or pitching downward with a fiery rush, eager and intent on objects
of their seeking"--

But it was the gifts and faculties which Haydon possessed, and not those
he lacked, it was the ardour and enthusiasm of his temperament, and not
his essential commonness of mind and faculty, that impressed his
associates as they impressed himself. The most distinguished spirits of
the time were among his friends. Some of them, like Wordsworth, held by
him always, while his imperious and importunate egotism wore out others
after a while. He was justly proud of his industry and strength of
purpose: proud also of his religious faith and piety, and in the habit of
thanking his maker effusively in set terms for special acts of favour and
protection, for this or that happy inspiration in a picture, for
deliverance from 'pecuniary emergencies', and the like. "I always rose up
from my knees," he says strikingly in a letter to Keats, "with a refreshed
fury, an iron-clenched firmness, a crystal piety of feeling that sent me
streaming on with a repulsive power against the troubles of life." And he
was prone to hold himself up as a model to his friends in both
particulars, lecturing them on faith and conduct while he was living, it
might be, on their bounty. Experience of these qualities partly alienated
Keats from him in the long run. But at first sight Haydon had much to
attract the spirits of ardent youth about him as a leader, and he and
Keats were mutually delighted when they met. Each struck fire from the
other, and they quickly became close friends and comrades. After an
evening of high talk at the beginning of their acquaintance, on the 19th
of November, 1816, the young poet wrote to Haydon as follows, joining his
name with those of Wordsworth and Leigh Hunt:--

    "Last evening wrought me up, and I cannot forbear sending you the
    following:--

        Great spirits now on earth are sojourning:
          He of the cloud, the cataract, the lake,
          Who on Helvellyn's summit, wide awake,
        Catches his freshness from Archangel's wing:
        He of the rose, the violet, the spring,
          The social smile, the chain for Freedom's sake,
          And lo! whose steadfastness would never take
        A meaner sound than Raphael's whispering.
        And other spirits there are standing apart
          Upon the forehead of the age to come;
        These, these will give the world another heart,
          And other pulses. Hear ye not the hum
        Of mighty workings in the human mart?
          Listen awhile, ye nations, and be dumb."

Haydon was not unused to compliments of this kind. The three well-known
sonnets of Wordsworth had been addressed to him a year or two before; and
about the same time as Keats, John Hamilton Reynolds also wrote him a
sonnet of enthusiastic sympathy and admiration. In his reply to Keats he
proposed to hand on the above piece to Wordsworth--a proposal which "puts
me," answers Keats, "out of breath--you know with what reverence I would
send my well-wishes to him." Haydon suggested moreover what I cannot but
think the needless and regrettable mutilation of the sonnet by leaving out
the words after 'workings' in the last line but one. The poet, however,
accepted the suggestion, and his editors have respected his decision. Two
other sonnets, which Keats wrote at this time, after visiting the Elgin
marbles with his new friend, are indifferent poetically, but do credit to
his sincerity in that he refuses to go into stock raptures on the subject,
confessing his inability rightly to grasp or analyse the impressions he
had received. By the spring of the following year his intimacy with Haydon
was at its height, and we find the painter giving his young friend a
standing invitation to his studio in Great Marlborough Street, declaring
him dearer than a brother, and praying that their hearts may be buried
together.

To complete the group of Keats's friends in these days, we have to think
of two or three others known to him otherwise than through Hunt, and not
belonging to the Hunt circle. Among these were the family and friends of a
Miss Georgiana Wylie, to whom George Keats was attached. She was the
daughter of a navy officer, with wit, sentiment, and an attractive
irregular cast of beauty, and Keats on his own account had a great liking
for her. On Valentine's day, 1816, we find him writing, for George to send
her, the first draft of the lines beginning, 'Hadst thou lived in days of
old,' afterwards amplified and published in his first volume[20]. Through
the Wylies Keats became acquainted with a certain William Haslam, who was
afterwards one of his own and his brothers' best friends, but whose
character and person remain indistinct to us; and through Haslam with
Joseph Severn, then a very young and struggling student of art. Severn was
the son of an engraver, and to the despair of his father had determined to
be himself a painter. He had a talent also for music, a strong love of
literature, and doubtless something already of that social charm which Mr
Ruskin describes in him when they first met five-and-twenty years later at
Rome[21]. From the moment of their introduction Severn found in Keats his
very ideal of the poetical character realized, and attached himself to him
with an admiring affection.

A still younger member of the Keats circle was Charles Wells, afterwards
author of _Stories after Nature_, and of that singular and strongly
imagined Biblical drama or 'dramatic poem' of _Joseph and his Brethren_,
which having fallen dead in its own day has been resuscitated by a group
of poets and critics in ours. Wells had been a school companion of Tom
Keats at Enfield, and was now living with his family in Featherstone
buildings. He has been described by those who knew him as a sturdy,
boisterous, blue-eyed and red-headed lad, distinguished in those days
chiefly by an irrepressible spirit of fun and mischief. He was only about
fifteen when he sent to John Keats the present of roses acknowledged in
the sonnet beginning, 'As late I rambled in the happy fields.' A year or
two later Keats quarrelled with him for a practical joke played on Tom
Keats without due consideration for his state of health; and the _Stories
after Nature_, published in 1822, are said to have been written in order
to show Keats "that he too could do something."

Thus by his third winter in London our obscurely-born and half-schooled
young medical student found himself fairly launched in a world of art,
letters, and liberal aspirations, and living in familiar intimacy with
some, and friendly acquaintance with others, of the brightest and most
ardent spirits of the time. His youth, origin, and temperament alike saved
him from anything but a healthy relation of equality with his younger, and
deference towards his elder, companions. But the power and the charm of
genius were already visibly upon him. Portraits both verbal and other
exist in abundance, enabling us to realise his presence and the impression
which he made. "The character and expression of his features," it is said,
"would arrest even the casual passenger in the street." A small, handsome,
ardent-looking youth--the stature little over five feet: the figure
compact and well-turned, with the neck thrust eagerly forward, carrying a
strong and shapely head set off by thickly clustering gold-brown hair: the
features powerful, finished, and mobile: the mouth rich and wide, with an
expression at once combative and sensitive in the extreme: the forehead
not high, but broad and strong: the eyebrows nobly arched, and eyes
hazel-brown, liquid-flashing, visibly inspired--"an eye that had an inward
look, perfectly divine, like a Delphian priestess who saw visions." "Keats
was the only man I ever met who seemed and looked conscious of a high
calling, except Wordsworth." These words are Haydon's, and to the same
effect Leigh Hunt:--"the eyes mellow and glowing, large, dark, and
sensitive. At the recital of a noble action or a beautiful thought, they
would suffuse with tears, and his mouth trembled." It is noticeable that
his friends, whenever they begin to describe his looks, go off in this way
to tell of the feelings and the soul that shone through them. To return to
Haydon:--"he was in his glory in the fields. The humming of a bee, the
sight of a flower, the glitter of the sun, seemed to make his nature
tremble; then his eyes flashed, his cheek glowed, and his mouth quivered."
In like manner George Keats:--"John's eyes moistened, and his lip
quivered, at the relation of any tale of generosity or benevolence or
noble daring, or at sights of loveliness or distress;" and a shrewd and
honoured survivor of those days, "herself of many poets the frequent theme
and valued friend,"--need I name Mrs Procter?--has recorded the impression
the same eyes have left upon her, as those of one who had been looking on
some glorious sight[22].

In regard to his social qualities, Keats is said, and owns himself, to
have been not always perfectly well-conditioned or at his ease in the
company of women, but in that of men all accounts agree that he was
pleasantness itself: quiet and abstracted or brilliant and voluble by
turns, according to his mood and company, but thoroughly amiable and
unaffected. If the conversation did not interest him he was apt to draw
apart, and sit by himself in the window, peering into vacancy; so that the
window-seat came to be recognized as his place. His voice was rich and
low, and when he joined in discussion, it was usually with an eager but
gentle animation, while his occasional bursts of fiery indignation at
wrong or meanness bore no undue air of assumption, and failed not to
command respect. His powers of mimicry and dramatic recital are said to
have been great, and never used unkindly.

Thus stamped by nature, and moving in such a circle as we have described,
Keats found among those with whom he lived nothing to check, but rather
everything to foster, his hourly growing, still diffident and trembling,
passion for the poetic life. His guardian, as we have said, of course was
adverse: but his brothers, including George, the practical and sensible
one of the family, were warmly with him, as his allusions and addresses to
them both in prose and verse, and their own many transcripts from his
compositions, show. In August 1816 we find him addressing from Margate a
sonnet and a poetical Epistle in terms of the utmost affection and
confidence to George. About the same time he gave up his lodgings in St
Thomas's Street to go and live with his brothers in the Poultry; and in
November he composes another sonnet on their fraternal fire-side
occupations. Poetry and the love of poetry were at this period in the air.
It was a time when even people of business and people of fashion read: a
time of literary excitement, expectancy, and discussion, such as England
has not known since. In such an atmosphere Keats soon found himself
induced to try his fortune and his powers with the rest. The encouragement
of his friends was indeed only too ready and enthusiastic. It was Leigh
Hunt who first brought him before the world in print, publishing without
comment, in the _Examiner_ for the 5th of May, 1816, his sonnet beginning,
'O Solitude! if I with thee must dwell,' and on the 1st of December in the
same year the sonnet on Chapman's Homer. This Hunt accompanied by some
prefatory remarks on the poetical promise of its author, associating with
his name those of Shelley and Reynolds. It was by the praise of Hunt in
this paper, says Mr Stephens, that Keats's fate was sealed. But already
the still more ardent encouragement of Haydon, if more was wanted, had
come to add fuel to the fire. In the Marlborough Street studio, in the
Hampstead cottage, in the City lodgings of the three brothers, and in the
convivial gatherings of their friends, it was determined that John Keats
should put forth a volume of his poems. A sympathetic firm of publishers
was found in the Olliers. The volume was printed, and the last
proof-sheets were brought one evening to the author amid a jovial company,
with the intimation that if a dedication was to be added the copy must be
furnished at once. Keats going to one side quickly produced the sonnet _To
Leigh Hunt Esqr._, with its excellent opening and its weak conclusion:--

  "Glory and Loveliness have pass'd away;
    For if we wander out in early morn,
    No wreathèd incense do we see upborne
  Into the East to meet the smiling day:
  No crowd of nymphs soft-voiced and young and gay,
    In woven baskets bringing ears of corn,
    Roses and pinks, and violets, to adorn
  The shrine of Flora in her early May.
  But there are left delights as high as these,
    And I shall ever bless my destiny,
  That in a time when under pleasant trees
    Pan is no longer sought, I feel a free,
  A leafy luxury, seeing I could please,
    With these poor offerings, a man like thee."

With this confession of a longing retrospect towards the beauty of the old
pagan world, and of gratitude for present friendship, the young poet's
first venture was sent forth in the month of March 1817.




CHAPTER III.

    The _Poems_ of 1817.


The note of Keats's early volume is accurately struck in the motto from
Spenser which he prefixed to it:--

  "What more felicity can fall to creature
  Than to enjoy delight with liberty?"

The element in which his poetry moves is liberty, the consciousness of
release from those conventions and restraints, not inherent in its true
nature, by which the art had for the last hundred years been hampered. And
the spirit which animates him is essentially the spirit of delight:
delight in the beauty of nature and the vividness of sensation, delight in
the charm of fable and romance, in the thoughts of friendship and
affection, in anticipations of the future, and in the exercise of the art
itself which expresses and communicates all these joys.

We have already glanced, in connection with the occasions which gave rise
to them, at a few of the miscellaneous boyish pieces in various metres
which are included in the volume, as well as at some of the sonnets. The
remaining and much the chief portion of the book consists of half a dozen
poems in the rhymed decasyllabic couplet. These had all been written
during the period between November 1815 and April 1817, under the combined
influence of the older English poets and of Leigh Hunt. The former
influence shows itself everywhere in the substance and spirit of the
poems, but less, for the present, in their form and style. Keats had by
this time thrown off the eighteenth-century stiffness which clung to his
earliest efforts, but he had not yet adopted, as he was about to do, a
vocabulary and diction of his own full of licences caught from the
Elizabethans and from Milton. The chief verbal echoes of Spenser to be
found in his first volume are a line quoted from him entire in the epistle
to G. F. Mathew, and the use of the archaic 'teen' in the stanzas
professedly Spenserian. We can indeed trace Keats's familiarity with
Chapman, and especially with one poem of Chapman's, his translation of the
Homeric _Hymn to Pan_, in a predilection for a particular form of abstract
descriptive substantive:--

          "the pillowy silkiness that rests
  Full in the speculation of the stars:"--

  "Or the quaint mossiness of aged roots:"--

  "Ere I can have explored its widenesses."[23]

The only other distinguishing marks of Keats's diction in this first
volume consist, I think, in the use of the Miltonic 'sphery,' and of an
unmeaning coinage of his own, 'boundly,' with a habit--for which Milton,
Spenser, and among the moderns Leigh Hunt all alike furnished him the
example--of turning nouns into verbs and verbs into nouns at his
convenience. For the rest, Keats writes in the ordinary English of his
day, with much more feeling for beauty of language than for correctness,
and as yet without any formed or assured poetic style. Single lines and
passages declare, indeed, abundantly his vital poetic faculty and
instinct. But they are mixed up with much that only illustrates his
crudity of taste, and the tendency he at this time shared with Leigh Hunt
to mistake the air of chatty, trivial gusto for an air of poetic ease and
grace.

In the matter of metre, we can see Keats in these poems making a
succession of experiments for varying the regularity of the heroic
couplet. In the colloquial _Epistles_, addressed severally to G. F.
Mathew, to his brother George, and to Cowden Clarke, he contents himself
with the use of frequent disyllabic rhymes, and an occasional
_enjambement_ or 'overflow.' In the _Specimen of an Induction to a Poem_,
and in the fragment of the poem itself, entitled _Calidore_ (a name
borrowed from the hero of Spenser's sixth book,) as well as in the unnamed
piece beginning 'I stood tiptoe upon a little hill,' which opens the
volume, he further modifies the measure by shortening now and then the
second line of the couplet, with a lyric beat that may have been caught
either from Spenser's nuptial odes or Milton's _Lycidas_,--

  "Open afresh your round of starry folds,
  Ye ardent marigolds."

In _Sleep and Poetry_, which is the most personal and interesting, as well
as probably the last-written, poem in the volume, Keats drops this
practice, but in other respects varies the rhythm far more boldly, making
free use of the overflow, placing his full pauses at any point in a line
rather than at the end, and adopting as a principle rather than an
exception the Chaucerian and Elizabethan fashion of breaking the couplet
by closing a sentence or paragraph with its first line.

Passing from the form of the poems to their substance, we find that they
are experiments or poetic preludes merely, with no pretension to be
organic or complete works of art. To rehearse ramblingly the pleasures and
aspirations of the poetic life, letting one train of images follow another
with no particular plan or sequence, is all that Keats as yet attempts:
except in the _Calidore_ fragment. And that is on the whole feeble and
confused: from the outset the poet loses himself in a maze of young
luxuriant imagery: once and again, however, he gets clear, and we have
some good lines in an approach to the Dryden manner:--

  "Softly the breezes from the forest came,
  Softly they blew aside the taper's flame;
  Clear was the song from Philomel's far bower;
  Grateful the incense from the lime-tree flower;
  Mysterious, wild, the far-heard trumpet's tone;
  Lovely the moon in ether, all alone."

To set against this are occasionally expressions in the complete taste of
Leigh Hunt, as for instance--

  "The lamps that from the high-roof'd wall were pendent,
  And gave the steel a shining quite transcendent."

The _Epistles_ are full of cordial tributes to the conjoint pleasures of
literature and friendship. In that to Cowden Clarke, Keats acknowledges to
his friend that he had been shy at first of addressing verses to him:--

  "Nor should I now, but that I've known you long;
  That you first taught me all the sweets of song:
  The grand, the sweet, the terse, the free, the fine,
  What swell'd with pathos, and what right divine:
  Spenserian vowels that elope with ease,
  And float along like birds o'er summer seas;
  Miltonian storms, and more, Miltonian tenderness;
  Michael in arms, and more, meek Eve's fair slenderness.
  Who read for me the sonnet swelling loudly
  Up to its climax, and then dying proudly?
  Who found for me the grandeur of the ode,
  Growing, like Atlas, stronger for its load?
  Who let me taste that more than cordial dram,
  The sharp, the rapier-pointed epigram?
  Show'd me that Epic was of all the king,
  Round, vast, and spanning all like Saturn's ring?"

This is characteristic enough of the quieter and lighter manner of Keats
in his early work. Blots like the ungrammatical fourth line are not
infrequent with him. The preference for Miltonian tenderness over
Miltonian storms may remind the reader of a later poet's more masterly
expression of the same sentiment:--'Me rather all that bowery
loneliness--'. The two lines on Spenser are of interest as conveying one
of those incidental criticisms on poetry by a poet, of which no one has
left us more or better than Keats. The habit of Spenser to which he here
alludes is that of coupling or repeating the same vowels, both in their
open and their closed sounds, in the same or successive lines, for
example,--

  "Eftsoones her shallow ship away did slide,
  More swift than swallow sheres the liquid skye;
  Withouten oare or pilot it to guide,
  Or winged canvas with the wind to fly."

The run here is on _a_ and _i_; principally on _i_, which occurs five
times in its open, and ten times in its closed, sound in the four
lines,--if we are indeed to reckon as one vowel these two unlike sounds
denoted by the same sign. Keats was a close and conscious student of the
musical effects of verse, and the practice of Spenser is said to have
suggested to him a special theory as to the use and value of the iteration
of vowel sounds in poetry. What his theory was we are not clearly told,
neither do I think it can easily be discovered from his practice; though
every one must feel a great beauty of his verse to be in the richness of
the vowel and diphthong sequences. He often spoke of the subject, and once
maintained his view against Wordsworth when the latter seemed to be
advocating a mechanical principle of vowel variation.

Hear, next how the joys of brotherly affection, of poetry, and of nature,
come naively jostling one another in the _Epistle_ addressed from the
sea-side to his brother George:--

  "As to my sonnets, though none else should heed them
  I feel delighted, still, that you should read them.
  Of late, too, I have had much calm enjoyment,
  Stretch'd on the grass at my best loved employment
  Of scribbling lines for you. These things I thought
  While, in my face, the freshest breeze I caught.
  E'en now I am pillow'd on a bed of flowers
  That crowns a lofty cliff, which proudly towers
  Above the ocean waves. The stalks and blades
  Chequer my tablet with their quivering shades.
  On one side is a field of drooping oats,
  Through which the poppies show their scarlet coats;
  So pert and useless that they bring to mind
  The scarlet coats that pester human kind.
  And on the other side, outspread is seen
  Ocean's blue mantle, streak'd with purple and green.
  Now 'tis I see a canvass'd ship, and now
  Mark the bright silver curling round her brow;
  I see the lark down-dropping to his nest,
  And the broad wing'd sea-gull never at rest;
  For when no more he spreads his feathers free,
  His breast is dancing on the restless sea."

It is interesting to watch the newly-awakened literary faculty in Keats
thus exercising itself in the narrow circle of personal sensation, and on
the description of the objects immediately before his eyes. The effect of
rhythmical movement attempted in the last lines, to correspond with the
buoyancy and variety of the motions described, has a certain felicity, and
the whole passage is touched already with Keats's exquisite perception and
enjoyment of external nature. His character as a poet of nature begins,
indeed, distinctly to declare itself in this first volume. He differs by
it alike from Wordsworth and from Shelley. The instinct of Wordsworth was
to interpret all the operations of nature by those of his own strenuous
soul; and the imaginative impressions he had received in youth from the
scenery of his home, deepened and enriched by continual after meditation,
and mingling with all the currents of his adult thought and feeling,
constituted for him throughout his life the most vital part alike of
patriotism, of philosophy, and of religion. For Shelley on his part
natural beauty was in a twofold sense symbolical. In the visible glories
of the world his philosophy saw the veil of the unseen, while his
philanthropy found in them types and auguries of a better life on earth;
and all that imagery of nature's more remote and skyey phenomena, of which
no other poet has had an equal mastery, and which comes borne to us along
the music of the verse--

                  "With many a mingled close
  Of wild Æolian sound and mountain odour keen"--

was inseparable in his soul from visions of a radiant future and a
renovated--alas! not a human--humanity. In Keats the sentiment of nature
was simpler than in either of these two other masters; more direct, and so
to speak more disinterested. It was his instinct to love and interpret
nature more for her own sake, and less for the sake of sympathy which the
human mind can read into her with its own workings and aspirations. He had
grown up neither like Wordsworth under the spell of lake and mountain, nor
in the glow of millennial dreams like Shelley, but London-born and
Middlesex-bred, was gifted, we know not whence, as if by some mysterious
birthright, with a delighted insight into all the beauties, and sympathy
with all the life, of the woods and fields. Evidences of the gift appear,
as every reader knows, in the longer poems of his first volume, with their
lingering trains of peaceful summer imagery, and loving inventories of
'Nature's gentle doings;' and pleasant touches of the same kind are
scattered also among the sonnets; as in that _To Charles Wells_,--

  "As late I rambled in the happy fields,
  What time the skylark shakes the tremulous dew
  From his lush clover covert,"--

or again in that _To Solitude_,--

              --"let me thy vigils keep
  'Mongst boughs pavilion'd, where the deer's swift leap
  Startles the wild bee from the foxglove bell."[24]

Such intuitive familiarity with the blithe activities, unnoted by common
eyes, which make up the life and magic of nature, is a gift we attribute
to men of primitive race and forest nurture; and Mr Matthew Arnold would
have us recognize it as peculiarly characteristic of the Celtic element in
the English genius and English poetry. It was allied in Keats to another
instinct of the early world which we associate especially with the Greeks,
the instinct for personifying the powers of nature in clearly-defined
imaginary shapes endowed with human beauty and half-human faculties. The
classical teaching of the Enfield school had not gone beyond Latin, and
neither in boyhood nor afterwards did Keats acquire any Greek: but towards
the creations of the Greek mythology he was attracted by an overmastering
delight in their beauty, and a natural sympathy with the phase of
imagination that engendered them. Especially he shows himself possessed
and fancy-bound by the mythology, as well as by the physical enchantment,
of the moon. Never was bard in youth so literally moonstruck. He had
planned a poem on the ancient story of the loves of Diana, with whom the
Greek moon-goddess Selene is identified in the Latin mythology, and the
shepherd-prince Endymion; and had begun a sort of prelude to it in the
piece that opens 'I stood tiptoe upon a little hill.' Afterwards, without
abandoning the subject, Keats laid aside this particular exordium, and
printed it, as we have seen, as an independent piece at the head of his
first volume. It is at the climax of a passage rehearsing the delights of
evening that he first bethinks himself of the moon--

                "lifting her silver rim
  Above a cloud, and with a gradual swim
  Coming into the blue with all her light."

The thought of the mythic passion of the moon-goddess for Endymion, and
the praises of the poet who first sang it, follow at considerable length.
The passage conjuring up the wonders and beneficences of their bridal
night is written in part with such a sympathetic touch for the collective
feelings and predicaments of men, in the ordinary conditions of human pain
and pleasure, health and sickness, as rarely occurs again in Keats's
poetry, though his correspondence shows it to have been most natural to
his mind:--

  "The evening weather was so bright, and clear,
  That men of health were of unusual cheer.

      *       *       *       *       *

  The breezes were ethereal, and pure,
  And crept through half-closed lattices to cure
  The languid sick; it cool'd their fever'd sleep,
  And sooth'd them into slumbers full and deep.
  Soon they awoke clear-ey'd: nor burnt with thirsting,
  Nor with hot fingers, nor with temples bursting:
  And springing up, they met the wond'ring sight
  Of their dear friends, nigh foolish with delight;
  Who feel their arms and breasts, and kiss and stare,
  And on their placid foreheads part the hair."[25]

Finally, Keats abandons and breaks off this tentative exordium of his
unwritten poem with the cry:--

  "Cynthia! I cannot tell the greater blisses
  That followed thine and thy dear shepherd's kisses:
  Was there a poet born? But now no more
  My wandering spirit must no farther soar."

Was there a poet born? Is the labour and the reward of poetry really and
truly destined to be his? The question is one which recurs in this early
volume importunately and in many tones; sometimes with words and cadences
closely recalling those of Milton in his boyish _Vacation Exercise_;
sometimes with a cry like this, which occurs twice over in the piece
called _Sleep and Poetry_,--

  "O Poesy! for thee I hold my pen,
  That am not yet a glorious denizen
  Of thy wide heaven:"--

and anon, with a less wavering, more confident and daring tone of young
ambition,--

  "But off, Despondence! miserable bane!
  They should not know thee, who, athirst to gain
  A noble end, are thirsty every hour.
  What though I am not wealthy in the dower
  Of spanning wisdom: though I do not know
  The shiftings of the mighty winds that blow
  Hither and thither all the changing thoughts
  Of man: though no great ministering reason sorts
  Out the dark mysteries of human souls
  To clear conceiving: yet there ever rolls
  A vast idea before me"--.

The feeling expressed in these last lines, the sense of the overmastering
pressure and amplitude of an inspiration as yet unrealized and indistinct,
gives way in other passages to confident anticipations of fame, and of the
place which he will hold in the affections of posterity.

There is obviously a great immaturity and uncertainty in all these
outpourings, an intensity and effervescence of emotion out of proportion
as yet both to the intellectual and the voluntary powers, much confusion
of idea, and not a little of expression. Yet even in this first book of
Keats there is much that the lover of poetry will always cherish.
Literature, indeed, hardly affords another example of work at once so
crude and so attractive. Passages that go to pieces under criticism
nevertheless have about them a spirit of beauty and of morning, an
abounding young vitality and freshness, that exhilarate and charm us
whether with the sanction of our judgment or without it. And alike at its
best and worst, the work proceeds manifestly from a spontaneous and
intense poetic impulse. The matter of these early poems of Keats is as
fresh and unconventional as their form, springing directly from the native
poignancy of his sensations and abundance of his fancy. That his
inexperience should always make the most discreet use of its freedom could
not be expected; but with all its immaturity his work has strokes already
which suggest comparison with the great names of literature. Who much
exceeds him, even from the first, but Shakspere in momentary felicity of
touch for nature, and in that charm of morning freshness who but Chaucer?
Already, too, we find him showing signs of that capacity for clear and
sane self-knowledge which becomes by-and-by so admirable in him. And he
has already begun to meditate to good purpose on the aims and methods of
his art. He has grasped and vehemently asserts the principle that poetry
should not strive to enforce particular doctrines, that it should not
contend in the field of reason, but that its proper organ is the
imagination, and its aim the creation of beauty. With reference to the
theory and practice of the poetic art the piece called _Sleep and Poetry_
contains one passage which has become classically familiar to all readers.
Often as it has been quoted elsewhere, it must be quoted again here, as
indispensable to the understanding of the literary atmosphere in which
Keats lived:--

              "Is there so small a range
  In the present strength of manhood, that the high
  Imagination cannot freely fly
  As she was wont of old? prepare her steeds,
  Paw up against the light, and do strange deeds
  Upon the clouds? Has she not shown us all?
  From the clear space of ether, to the small
  Breath of new buds unfolding? From the meaning
  Of Jove's large eyebrow, to the tender greening
  Of April meadows? here her altar shone,
  E'en in this isle; and who could paragon
  The fervid choir that lifted up a noise
  Of harmony, to where it aye will poise
  Its mighty self of convoluting sound,
  Huge as a planet, and like that roll round,
  Eternally around a dizzy void?
  Ay, in those days the Muses were nigh cloy'd
  With honours; nor had any other care
  Than to sing out and soothe their wavy hair.
    Could all this be forgotten? Yes, a schism
  Nurtured by foppery and barbarism
  Made great Apollo blush for this his land.
  Men were thought wise who could not understand
  His glories; with a puling infant's force
  They sway'd about upon a rocking-horse,
  And thought it Pegasus. Ah, dismal-soul'd!
  The winds of heaven blew, the ocean roll'd
  Its gathering waves--ye felt it not. The blue
  Bared its eternal bosom, and the dew
  Of summer night collected still to make
  The morning precious: Beauty was awake!
  Why were ye not awake? But ye were dead
  To things ye knew not of,--were closely wed
  To musty laws lined out with wretched rule
  And compass vile; so that ye taught a school
  Of dolts to smooth, inlay, and clip, and fit,
  Till, like the certain wands of Jacob's wit,
  Their verses tallied. Easy was the task:
  A thousand handicraftsmen wore the mask
  Of Poesy. Ill-fated, impious race!
  That blasphemed the bright Lyrist to his face,
  And did not know it,--no, they went about,
  Holding a poor, decrepit standard out,
  Mark'd with most flimsy mottoes, and in large
  The name of one Boileau!
                          O ye whose charge
  It is to hover round our pleasant hills!
  Whose congregated majesty so fills
  My boundly reverence, that I cannot trace
  Your hallow'd names, in this unholy place,
  So near those common folk; did not their shames
  Affright you? Did our old lamenting Thames
  Delight you? did ye never cluster round
  Delicious Avon, with a mournful sound,
  And weep? Or did ye wholly bid adieu
  To regions where no more the laurel grew?
  Or did ye stay to give a welcoming
  To some lone spirits who could proudly sing
  Their youth away, and die? 'Twas even so.
  But let me think away those times of woe:
  Now 'tis a fairer season; ye have breathed
  Rich benedictions o'er us; ye have wreathed
  Fresh garlands: for sweet music has been heard
  In many places; some has been upstirr'd
  From out its crystal dwelling in a lake,
  By a swan's ebon bill; from a thick brake,
  Nested and quiet in a valley mild,
  Bubbles a pipe; fine sounds are floating wild
  About the earth: happy are ye and glad."

Both the strength and the weakness of this are typically characteristic of
the time and of the man. The passage is likely to remain for posterity the
central expression of the spirit of literary emancipation then militant
and about to triumph in England. The two great elder captains of
revolution, Coleridge and Wordsworth, have both expounded their cause, in
prose, with much more maturity of thought and language; Coleridge in the
luminous retrospect of the _Biographia Literaria_, Wordsworth in the
austere contentions of his famous prefaces. But neither has left any
enunciation of theory having power to thrill the ear and haunt the memory
like the rhymes of this young untrained recruit in the cause of poetic
liberty and the return to nature. It is easy, indeed, to pick these verses
of Keats to shreds, if we choose to fix a prosaic and rational attention
on their faults. What is it, for instance, that imagination is asked to
do? fly, or drive? Is it she, or her steeds, that are to paw up against
the light? and why paw? Deeds to be done upon clouds by pawing can hardly
be other than strange. What sort of a verb is 'I green, thou greenest?'
Delight with liberty is very well, but liberty in a poet ought not to
include liberties with the parts of speech. Why should the hair of the
muses require 'soothing'?--if it were their tempers it would be more
intelligible. And surely 'foppery' belongs to civilization and not to
'barbarism': and a standard-bearer may be decrepit, but not a standard,
and a standard flimsy, but not a motto. 'Boundly reverence': what is
boundly? And so on without end, if we choose to let the mind assume that
attitude. Many minds not indifferent to literature were at that time, and
some will at all times be, incapable of any other. Such must naturally
turn to the work of the eighteenth century school, the school of tact and
urbane brilliancy and sedulous execution, and think the only 'blasphemy'
was on the side of the youth who could call, or seem to call, the poet of
Belinda and the _Epistle to Dr Arbuthnot_ fool and dolt. Byron, in his
controversy with Bowles a year or two later, adopted this mode of attack
effectively enough: his spleen against a contemporary finding as usual its
most convenient weapon in an enthusiasm, partly real and partly affected,
for the genius and the methods of Pope. But controversy apart, if we have
in us a touch of instinct for the poetry of imagination and beauty, as
distinct from that of taste and reason, however clearly we may see the
weak points of a passage like this, however much we may wish that taste
and reason had had more to do with it, yet we cannot but feel that Keats
touches truly the root of the matter; we cannot but admire the elastic
life and variety of his verse, his fine spontaneous and effective turns of
rhetoric, the ring and power of his appeal to the elements, and the glow
of his delight in the achievements and promise of the new age.

His volume on its appearance by no means made the impression which his
friends had hoped for it. Hunt published a thoroughly judicious as well as
cordial criticism in the _Examiner_, and several of the provincial papers
noticed the book. Haydon wrote in his ranting vein: "I have read your
_Sleep and Poetry_--it is a flash of lightning that will rouse men from
their occupations, and keep them trembling for the crash of thunder that
_will_ follow." But people were in fact as far from being disturbed in
their occupations as possible. The attention of the reading public was for
the moment almost entirely absorbed by men of talent or of genius who
played with a more careless, and some of them with a more masterly touch
than Keats as yet, on commoner chords of the human spirit; as Moore,
Scott, and Byron. In Keats's volume every one could see the faults, while
the beauties appealed only to the poetically minded. It seems to have had
a moderate sale at first, but after the first few weeks none at all. The
poet, or at all events his brothers for him, were inclined, apparently
with little reason, to blame their friends the publishers for the failure.
On the 29th of April we find the brothers Ollier replying to a letter of
George Keats in dudgeon:--"we regret that your brother ever requested us
to publish his book, or that our opinion of its talent should have led us
to acquiesce in undertaking it. We are, however, much obliged to you for
relieving us from the unpleasant necessity of declining any further
connexion with it, which we must have done, as we think the curiosity is
satisfied, and the sale has dropped." One of their customers, they go on
to say, had a few days ago hurt their feelings as men of business and of
taste by calling it "no better than a take in."

A fortnight before the date of this letter Keats had left London. Haydon
had been urging on him, not injudiciously, the importance of seclusion and
concentration of mind. We find him writing to Reynolds soon after the
publication of his volume:--"My brothers are anxious that I should go by
myself into the country; they have always been extremely fond of me, and
now that Haydon has pointed out how necessary it is that I should be alone
to improve myself, they give up the temporary pleasure of living with me
continually for a great good which I hope will follow: so I shall soon be
out of town." And on the 14th of April he in fact started for the Isle of
Wight, intending to devote himself entirely to study, and to make
immediately a fresh start upon _Endymion_.




CHAPTER IV.

    Excursion to Isle of Wight, Margate, and Canterbury--Summer at
    Hampstead--New Friends: Dilke: Brown: Bailey--With Bailey at
    Oxford--Return: Old Friends at Odds--Burford Bridge--Winter at
    Hampstead--Wordsworth: Lamb: Hazlitt--Poetical Activity--Spring at
    Teignmouth--Studies and Anxieties--Marriage and Emigration of George
    Keats. [April, 1817-May, 1818.]


As soon as Keats reached the Isle of Wight, on April 16, 1817, he went to
see Shanklin and Carisbrooke, and after some hesitation between the two,
decided on a lodging at the latter place. The next day he writes to
Reynolds that he has spent the morning arranging the books and prints he
had brought with him, adding to the latter one of Shakspere which he had
found in the passage and which had particularly pleased him. He speaks
with enthusiasm of the beauties of Shanklin, but in a postscript written
the following day, mentions that he has been nervous from want of sleep,
and much haunted by the passage in _Lear_, 'Do you not hear the
sea?'--adding without farther preface his own famous sea-sonnet
beginning--

  "It keeps eternal whisperings around
    Desolate shores, and with its mighty swell
    Gluts twice ten thousand caverns"--.

In the same postscript Keats continues:--

    "I find I cannot do without poetry--without eternal poetry; half the
    day will not do--the whole of it. I began with a little, but habit has
    made me a leviathan. I had become all in a tremble from not having
    written anything of late: the Sonnet overleaf did me good; I slept the
    better last night for it; this morning, however, I am nearly as bad
    again.... I shall forthwith begin my _Endymion_, which I hope I shall
    have got some way with before you come, when we will read our verses
    in a delightful place I have set my heart upon, near the Castle."

The Isle of Wight, however, Keats presently found did not suit him, and
Haydon's prescription of solitude proved too trying. He fell into a kind
of fever of thought and sleeplessness, which he thought it wisest to try
and shake off by flight. Early in May we find him writing to Leigh Hunt
from Margate, where he had already stayed the year before, and explaining
the reasons of his change of abode. Later in the same letter, endeavouring
to measure his own powers against the magnitude of the task to which he
has committed himself, he falls into a vein like that which we have seen
recurring once and again in his verses during the preceding year, the vein
of awed self-questioning, and tragic presentiment uttered half in earnest
and half in jest. The next day we find him writing a long and intimate,
very characteristic letter to Haydon, signed 'your everlasting friend,'
and showing the first signs of the growing influence which Haydon was
beginning to exercise over him in antagonism to the influence of Leigh
Hunt. Keats was quite shrewd enough to feel for himself after a little
while the touches of vanity, fuss, and affectation, the lack of depth and
strength, in the kind and charming nature of Hunt, and quite loyal enough
to value his excellences none the less, and hold him in grateful and
undiminished friendship. But Haydon, between whom and Hunt there was by
degrees arising a coolness, must needs have Keats see things as he saw
them. "I love you like my own brother," insists he: "beware, for God's
sake, of the delusions and sophistications that are ripping up the talents
and morality of our friend! He will go out of the world the victim of his
own weakness and the dupe of his own self-delusions, with the contempt of
his enemies and the sorrow of his friends, and the cause he undertook to
support injured by his own neglect of character." There is a lugubrious
irony in these words, when we remember how Haydon, a self-deluder indeed,
came to realise at last the very fate he here prophesies for
another,--just when Hunt, the harassing and often sordid, ever brightly
borne troubles of his earlier life left behind him, was passing surrounded
by affection into the haven of a peaceful and bland old age. But for a
time, under the pressure of Haydon's masterful exhortations, we find Keats
inclining to take an exaggerated and slightly impatient view of the
foibles of his earlier friend.

Among other interesting confessions to be found in Keats's letter to
Haydon from Margate, is that of the fancy--almost the sense--which often
haunted him of dependence on the tutelary genius of Shakspere:--

    "I remember your saying that you had notions of a good genius
    presiding over you. I have lately had the same thought, for things
    which I do half at random, are afterwards confirmed by my judgment in
    a dozen features of propriety. Is it too daring to fancy Shakspeare
    this presider? When in the Isle of Wight I met with a Shakspeare in
    the passage of the house at which I lodged. It comes nearer to my idea
    of him than any I have seen; I was but there a week, yet the old woman
    made me take it with me, though I went off in a hurry. Do you not
    think this ominous of good?"

Next he lays his finger on the great secret flaw in his own nature,
describing it in words which the after issue of his life will keep but
too vividly and constantly before our minds:--"truth is, I have a horrid
Morbidity of Temperament, which has shown itself at intervals; it is, I
have no doubt, the greatest Enemy and stumbling-block I have to fear; I
may even say, it is likely to be the cause of my disappointment." Was it
that, in this seven-months' child of a consumptive mother, some unhealth
of mind as well as body was congenital?--or was it that, along with what
seems his Celtic intensity of feeling and imagination, he had inherited a
special share of that inward gloom which the reverses of their history
have stamped, according to some, on the mind of the Celtic race? We cannot
tell, but certain it is that along with the spirit of delight, ever
creating and multiplying images of beauty and joy, there dwelt in Keats's
bosom an almost equally busy and inventive spirit of self-torment.

The fit of dejection which led to the remark above quoted had its
immediate cause in apprehensions of money difficulties conveyed to Keats
in a letter from his brother George. The trust funds of which Mr Abbey had
the disposal for the benefit of the orphans, under the deed executed by
Mrs Jennings, amounted approximately to £8,000[26], of which the capital
was divisible among them on their coming of age, and the interest was to
be applied to their maintenance in the meantime. But the interest of
John's share had been insufficient for his professional and other expenses
during his term of medical study at Edmonton and London, and much of his
capital had been anticipated to meet them; presumably in the form of loans
raised on the security of his expectant share. Similar advances had also
been for some time necessary to the invalid Tom for his support, and
latterly--since he left the employment of Mr Abbey--to George as well. It
is clear that the arrangements for obtaining these advances were made both
wastefully and grudgingly. It is further plain that the brothers were very
insufficiently informed of the state of their affairs. In the meantime
John Keats was already beginning to discount his expectations from
literature. Before or about the time of his rupture with the Olliers, he
had made the acquaintance of those excellent men, Messrs Taylor and
Hessey, who were shortly, as publishers of the _London Magazine_, to
gather about them on terms of cordial friendship a group of contributors
comprising more than half the choicest spirits of the day. With them,
especially with Mr Taylor, who was himself a student and writer of
independent, somewhat eccentric ability and research, Keats's relations
were excellent from first to last, generous on their part, and
affectionate and confidential on his. He had made arrangements with them,
apparently before leaving London, for the eventual publication of
_Endymion_, and from Margate we find him acknowledging a first payment
received in advance. Now and again afterwards he turns to the same friends
for help at a pinch, adding once, "I am sure you are confident of my
responsibility, and of the sense of squareness that is always in me;" nor
did they at any time belie his expectation.

From Margate, where he had already made good progress with _Endymion_,
Keats went with his brother Tom to spend some time at Canterbury. Thence
they moved early in the summer to lodgings kept by a Mr and Mrs Bentley in
Well Walk, Hampstead, where the three brothers had decided to take up
their abode together. Here he continued through the summer to work
steadily at _Endymion_, being now well advanced with the second book; and
some of his friends, as Haydon, Cowden Clarke, and Severn, remembered all
their lives afterwards the occasions when they walked with him on the
heath, while he repeated to them, in his rich and tremulous, half-chanting
tone, the newly-written passages which best pleased him. From his poetical
absorption and Elysian dreams they were accustomed to see him at a touch
come back to daily life; sometimes to sympathize heart and soul with their
affairs, sometimes in a burst of laughter, nonsense, and puns, (it was a
punning age, and the Keats's were a very punning family), sometimes with a
sudden flash of his old schoolboy pugnacity and fierceness of righteous
indignation. To this summer or the following winter, it is not quite
certain which, belongs the well-known story of his thrashing in stand-up
fight a stalwart young butcher whom he had found tormenting a cat (a
'ruffian in livery' according to one account, but the butcher version is
the best attested).

For the rest, the choice of Hampstead as a place of residence had much to
recommend it to Keats: the freshness of the air for the benefit of the
invalid Tom: for his own walks and meditations those beauties of heath,
field, and wood, interspersed with picturesque embosomed habitations,
which his imagination could transmute at will into the landscapes of
Arcadia, or into those, 'with high romances blent,' of an earlier England
or of fable-land. For society there was the convenient proximity to, and
yet seclusion from, London, together with the immediate neighbourhood of
one or two intimate friends. Among these, Keats frequented as familiarly
as ever the cottage in the Vale of Health where Leigh Hunt was still
living--a kind of self-appointed poet-laureate of Hampstead, the features
of which he was for ever celebrating, now in sonnets, and now in the
cheerful singsong of his familiar _Epistles_:--

  "And yet how can I touch, and not linger awhile
  On the spot that has haunted my youth like a smile?
  On its fine breathing prospects, its clump-wooded glades,
  Dark pines, and white houses, and long-alley'd shades,
  With fields going down, where the bard lies and sees
  The hills up above him with roofs in the trees."

Several effusions of this kind, with three sonnets addressed to Keats
himself, some translations from the Greek, and a not ungraceful
mythological poem, the _Nymphs_, were published early in the following
year by Leigh Hunt in a volume called _Foliage_, which helped to draw down
on him and his friends the lash of Tory criticism.

Near the foot of the heath, in the opposite direction from Hunt's cottage,
lived two new friends of Keats who had been introduced to him by Reynolds,
and with whom he was soon to become extremely intimate. These were Charles
Wentworth Dilke and Charles Armitage Brown (or plain Charles Brown as he
at this time styled himself). Dilke was a young man of twenty-nine, by
birth belonging to a younger branch of the Dilkes of Maxstoke Castle, by
profession a clerk in the Navy Pay office, and by opinions at this time a
firm disciple of Godwin. He soon gave himself up altogether to literary
and antiquarian studies, and lived, as every one knows, to be one of the
most accomplished and influential of English critics and journalists, and
for many years editor and chief owner of the _Athenæum_. No two men could
well be more unlike in mind than Dilke and Keats: Dilke positive, bent on
certainty, and unable, as Keats says, "to feel he has a personal identity
unless he has made up his mind about everything:" while Keats on his part
held that "the only means of strengthening one's intellect is to make up
one's mind about nothing--to let the mind be a thoroughfare for all
thoughts." Nevertheless the two took to each other and became fast
friends. Dilke had married young, and built himself, a year or two before
Keats knew him, a modest semi-detached house in a good-sized garden near
the lower end of Hampstead Heath, at the bottom of what is now John
Street; the other part of the same block being built and inhabited by his
friend Charles Brown. This Brown was the son of a Scotch stockbroker
living in Lambeth. He was born in 1786, and while almost a boy went out to
join one of his brothers in a merchant's business at St Petersburg; but
the business failing, he returned to England in 1808, and lived as he
could for the next few years, until the death of another brother put him
in possession of a small competency. He had a taste, and some degree of
talent for literature, and held strongly Radical opinions. In 1810 he
wrote an opera on a Russian subject, called _Narensky_, which was brought
out at the Lyceum with Braham in the principal part; and at intervals
during the next twenty years many criticisms, tales, and translations from
the Italian, chiefly printed in the various periodicals edited by Leigh
Hunt. When Keats first knew him, Brown was a young man already of somewhat
middle-aged appearance, stout, bald, and spectacled,--a kindly companion,
and jovial, somewhat free liver, with a good measure both of obstinacy and
caution lying in reserve, _more Scotico_, under his pleasant and convivial
outside. It is clear by his relations with Keats that his heart was warm,
and that when once attached, he was capable not only of appreciation but
of devotion. After the poet's death Brown went to Italy, and became the
friend of Trelawney, whom he helped with the composition of the
_Adventures of a Younger Son_, and of Landor, at whose villa near Florence
Lord Houghton first met him in 1832. Two years later he returned to
England, and settled at Plymouth, where he continued to occupy himself
with literature and journalism, and particularly with his chief work, an
essay, ingenious and in part sound, on the autobiographical poems of
Shakspere. Thoughts of Keats, and a wish to be his biographer, never left
him, until in 1841 he resolved suddenly to emigrate to New Zealand, and
departed leaving his materials in Lord Houghton's hands. A year afterwards
he died of apoplexy at the settlement of New Plymouth, now called
Taranaki[27].

Yet another friend of Reynolds who in these months attached himself with a
warm affection to Keats was Benjamin Bailey, an Oxford undergraduate
reading for the Church, afterwards Archdeacon of Colombo. Bailey was a
great lover of books, devoted especially to Milton among past and to
Wordsworth among present poets. For his earnestness and integrity of
character Keats conceived a strong respect, and a hearty liking for his
person, and much of what was best in his own nature, and deepest in his
mind and cogitations, was called out in the intercourse that ensued
between them. In the course of this summer, 1817, Keats had been invited
by Shelley to stay with him at Great Marlow, and Hunt, ever anxious that
the two young poets should be friends, pressed him strongly to accept the
invitation. It is said by Medwin, but the statement is not confirmed by
other evidence, that Shelley and Keats had set about their respective
'summer tasks,' the composition of _Laon and Cythna_ and of _Endymion_, by
mutual agreement and in a spirit of friendly rivalry. Keats at any rate
declined his brother poet's invitation, in order, as he said, that he
might have his own unfettered scope. Later in the same summer, while his
brothers were away on a trip to Paris, he accepted an invitation of Bailey
to come to Oxford, and stayed there during the last five or six weeks of
the Long Vacation. Here he wrote the third book of _Endymion_, working
steadily every morning, and composing with great facility his regular
average of fifty lines a day. The afternoons they would spend in walking
or boating on the Isis, and Bailey has feelingly recorded the pleasantness
of their days, and of their discussions on life, literature, and the
mysteries of things. He tells of the sweetness of Keats's temper and charm
of his conversation, and of the gentleness and respect with which the hot
young liberal and free-thinker would listen to his host's exposition of
his own orthodox convictions: describes his enthusiasm in quoting
Chatterton and in dwelling on passages of Wordsworth's poetry,
particularly from the _Tintern Abbey_ and the _Ode on Immortality_: and
recalls his disquisitions on the harmony of numbers and other
technicalities of his art, the power of his thrilling looks and low-voiced
recitations, his vividness of inner life, and intensity of quiet enjoyment
during their field and river rambles and excursions[28]. One special
occasion of pleasure was a pilgrimage they made together to
Stratford-on-Avon. From Oxford are some of the letters written by Keats
in his happiest vein; to Reynolds and his sister Miss Jane Reynolds,
afterwards Mrs Tom Hood; to Haydon; and to his young sister Frances Mary,
or Fanny as she was always called (now Mrs Llanos). George Keats, writing
to this sister after John's death, speaks of the times "when we lived with
our grandmother at Edmonton, and John, Tom, and myself were always
devising plans to amuse you, jealous lest you should prefer either of us
to the others." Since those times Keats had seen little of her, Mr Abbey
having put her to a boarding-school before her grandmother's death, and
afterwards taken her into his own house at Walthamstow, where the visits
of her poet brother were not encouraged. "He often," writes Bailey, "spoke
to me of his sister, who was somehow withholden from him, with great
delicacy and tenderness of affection:" and from this time forward we find
him maintaining with her a correspondence which shows his character in its
most attractive light. He bids her keep all his letters and he will keep
hers--"and thus in the course of time we shall each of us have a good
bundle--which hereafter, when things may have strangely altered and God
knows what happened, we may read over together and look with pleasure on
times past--that now are to come." He tells her about Oxford and about his
work, and gives her a sketch of the story of _Endymion_--"but I daresay
you have read this and all other beautiful tales which have come down to
us from the ancient times of that beautiful Greece."

Early in October Keats returned to Hampstead, whence he writes to Bailey
noticing with natural indignation the ruffianly first article of the
_Cockney School_ series, which had just appeared in _Blackwood's
Magazine_ for that month. In this the special object of attack was Leigh
Hunt, but there were allusions to Keats which seemed to indicate that his
own turn was coming. What made him more seriously uneasy were signs of
discord springing up among his friends, and of attempts on the part of
some of them to set him against others. Haydon had now given up his studio
in Great Marlborough Street for one in Lisson Grove; and Hunt, having left
the Vale of Health, was living close by him at a lodging in the same
street. "I know nothing of anything in this part of the world," writes
Keats: "everybody seems at loggerheads." And he goes on to say how Hunt
and Haydon are on uncomfortable terms, and "live, _pour ainsi dire_,
jealous neighbours. Haydon says to me, 'Keats, don't show your lines to
Hunt on any account, or he will have done half for you'--so it appears
Hunt wishes it to be thought." With more accounts of warnings he had
received from common friends that Hunt was not feeling or speaking
cordially about _Endymion_. "Now is not all this a most paltry thing to
think about?... This is, to be sure, but the vexation of a day, nor would
I say so much about it to any but those whom I know to have my welfare and
reputation at heart[29]." When three months later Keats showed Hunt the
first book of his poem in proof, the latter found many faults. It is clear
he was to some extent honestly disappointed in the work itself. He may
also have been chagrined at not having been taken more fully into
confidence during its composition; and what he said to others was probably
due partly to such chagrin, partly to nervousness on behalf of his
friend's reputation: for of double-facedness or insincerity in friendship
we know by a hundred evidences that Hunt was incapable. Keats, however,
after what he had heard, was by no means without excuse when he wrote to
his brothers concerning Hunt,--not unkindly, or making much of the
matter,--"the fact is, he and Shelley are hurt, and perhaps justly, at my
not having showed them the affair officiously; and from several hints I
have had, they appear much disposed to dissect and anatomize any trip or
slip I may have made. But who's afraid?" Keats was not the man to let this
kind of thing disturb seriously his relations with a friend: and writing
about the same time to Bailey, still concerning the dissensions in the
circle, he expounds the practical philosophy of friendship with truly
admirable good sense and feeling:--

    "Things have happened lately of great perplexity; you must have heard
    of them; Reynolds and Haydon retorting and recriminating, and parting
    for ever. The same thing has happened between Haydon and Hunt. It is
    unfortunate: men should bear with each other; there lives not the man
    who may not be cut up, aye, lashed to pieces, on his weakest side. The
    best of men have but a portion of good in them--a kind of spiritual
    yeast in their frames, which creates the ferment of existence--by
    which a man is propelled to act, and strive, and buffet with
    circumstance. The sure way, Bailey, is first to know a man's faults,
    and then be passive. If after that he insensibly draws you towards
    him, then you have no power to break the link. Before I felt
    interested in either Reynolds or Haydon, I was well-read in their
    faults; yet knowing them both I have been cementing gradually with
    both. I have an affection for them both, for reasons almost opposite;
    and to both must I of necessity cling, supported always by the hope
    that when a little time, a few years, shall have tried me more fully
    in their esteem, I may be able to bring them together. This time must
    come, because they have both hearts; and they will recollect the best
    parts of each other when this gust is overblown."

Keats had in the meantime been away on another autumn excursion into the
country: this time to Burford Bridge near Dorking. Here he passed
pleasantly the latter part of November, much absorbed in the study of
Shakspere's minor poems and sonnets, and in the task of finishing
_Endymion_. He had thus all but succeeded in carrying out the hope which
he had expressed in the opening passage of the poem:--

  "Many and many a verse I hope to write,
  Before the daisies, vermeil rimm'd and white,
  Hide in deep herbage; and ere yet the bees
  Hum about globes of clover and sweet peas,
  I must be near the middle of my story.
  O may no wintry season, bare and hoary,
  See it half finished; but let Autumn bold,
  With universal tinge of sober gold,
  Be all about me when I make an end."

Returning to Hampstead, Keats spent the first part of the winter in
comparative rest from literary work. His chief occupation was in revising
and seeing _Endymion_ through the press, with much help from the
publisher, Mr Taylor; varied by occasional essays in dramatic criticism,
and as the spring began, by the composition of a number of minor
incidental poems. In December he lost the companionship of his brothers,
who went to winter in Devonshire for the sake of Tom's health. But in
other company he was at this time mixing freely. The convivial gatherings
of the young men of his own circle were frequent, the fun high, the
discussions on art and literature boisterous, and varied with a moderate,
evidently never a very serious, amount of card-playing, drinking, and
dissipation. From these gatherings Keats was indispensable, and more than
welcome in the sedater literary circle of his publishers, Messrs Taylor
and Hessey, men as strict in conduct and opinion as they were
good-hearted. His social relations began, indeed, in the course of this
winter to extend themselves more than he much cared about, or thought
consistent with proper industry. We find him dining with Horace Smith in
company with some fashionable wits, concerning whom he reflects:--"They
only served to convince me how superior humour is to wit, in respect to
enjoyment. These men say things which make one start, without making one
feel; they are all alike; their manners are alike; they all know
fashionables; they have all a mannerism in their very eating and drinking,
in their mere handling a decanter. They talked of Kean and his low
company. 'Would I were with that company instead of yours', said I to
myself." Men of ardent and deep natures, whether absorbed in the realities
of experience, or in the ideals of art and imagination, are apt to be
affected in this way by the conventional social sparkle which is only
struck from and only illuminates the surface. Hear, on the other hand,
with what pleasure and insight, what sympathy of genius for genius, Keats
writes after seeing the great tragedian last mentioned interpret the inner
and true passions of the soul:--

    "The sensual life of verse springs warm from the lips of Kean ... his
    tongue must seem to have robbed the Hybla bees and left them
    honeyless! There is an indescribable _gusto_ in his voice, by which we
    feel that the utterer is thinking of the past and future while
    speaking of the instant. When he says in Othello, 'Put up your bright
    swords, for the dew will rust them,' we feel that his throat had
    commanded where swords were as thick as reeds. From eternal risk, he
    speaks as though his body were unassailable. Again, his exclamation of
    'blood! blood! blood!' is direful and slaughterous to the last degree;
    the very words appear stained and gory. His nature hangs over them,
    making a prophetic repast. The voice is loosed on them, like the wild
    dogs on the savage relics of an eastern conflict; and we can
    distinctly hear it 'gorging and growling o'er carcase and limb.' In
    Richard, 'Be stirring with the lark to-morrow, gentle Norfolk!' came
    from him, as through the morning atmosphere towards which he yearns."

It was in the Christmas weeks of 1817-18 that Keats undertook the office
of theatrical critic for the _Champion_ newspaper in place of Reynolds,
who was away at Exeter. Early in January he writes to his brothers of the
pleasure he has had in seeing their sister, who had been brought to London
for the Christmas holidays; and tells them how he has called on and been
asked to dine by Wordsworth, whom he had met on the 28th of December at a
supper given by Haydon. This is the famous Sunday supper, or 'immortal
dinner' as Haydon calls it, which is described at length in one of the
most characteristic passages of the painter's _Autobiography_. Besides
Wordsworth and Keats and the host, there were present Charles Lamb and
Monkhouse. "Wordsworth's fine intonation as he quoted Milton and Virgil,
Keats's eager inspired look, Lamb's quaint sparkle of lambent humour, so
speeded the stream of conversation," says Haydon, "that I never passed a
more delightful time." Later in the evening came in Ritchie the African
traveller, just about to start on the journey to Fezzan on which he died,
besides a self-invited guest in the person of one Kingston, Comptroller of
Stamps, a foolish good-natured gentleman, recommended only by his
admiration for Wordsworth. Presently Lamb getting fuddled, lost patience
with the platitudes of Mr Kingston, and began making fun of him, with
pranks and personalities which to Haydon appeared hugely funny, but which
Keats in his letter to his brothers mentions with less relish, saying,
"Lamb got tipsy and blew up Kingston, proceeding so far as to take the
candle across the room, hold it to his face, and show us what a soft
fellow he was[30]." Keats saw Wordsworth often in the next few weeks after
their introduction at Haydon's, but has left us no personal impressions of
the elder poet, except a passing one of surprise at finding him one day
preparing to dine, in a stiff collar and his smartest clothes, with his
aforesaid unlucky admirer Mr Comptroller Kingston. We know from other
sources that he was once persuaded to recite to Wordsworth the Hymn to Pan
from _Endymion_. "A pretty piece of Paganism," remarked Wordsworth,
according to his usual encouraging way with a brother poet; and Keats was
thought to have winced under the frigidity. Independently of their
personal relations, the letters of Keats show that Wordsworth's poetry
continued to be much in his thoughts throughout these months; what he has
to say of it varying according to the frame of mind in which he writes. In
the enthusiastic mood he declares, and within a few days again insists,
that there are three things to rejoice at in the present age, "The
_Excursion_, Haydon's Pictures, and Hazlitt's depth of Taste." This
mention of the name of Hazlitt brings us to another intellectual influence
which somewhat powerfully affected Keats at this time. On the liberal side
in politics and criticism there was no more effective or more uncertain
free lance than that eloquent and splenetic writer, with his rich,
singular, contradictory gifts, his intellect equally acute and fervid, his
temperament both enthusiastic and morose, his style at once rich and
incisive. The reader acquainted with Hazlitt's manner will easily
recognize its influence on Keats in the fragment of stage criticism above
quoted. Hazlitt was at this time delivering his course of lectures on the
English poets at the Surrey Institution, and Keats was among his regular
attendants. With Hazlitt personally, as with Lamb, his intercourse at
Haydon's and elsewhere seems to have been frequent and friendly, but not
intimate: and Haydon complains that it was only after the death of Keats
that he could get Hazlitt to acknowledge his genius.

Of Haydon himself, and of his powers as a painter, we see by the words
above quoted that Keats continued to think as highly as ever. He had, as
Severn assures us, a keen natural instinct for the arts both of painting
and music. Cowden Clarke's piano-playing had been a delight to him at
school, and he tells us himself how from a boy he had in his mind's eye
visions of pictures:--"when a schoolboy the abstract idea I had of an
heroic painting was what I cannot describe. I saw it somewhat sideways,
large, prominent, round, and coloured with magnificence--somewhat like the
feel I have of Anthony and Cleopatra. Or of Alcibiades leaning on his
crimson couch in his galley, his broad shoulders imperceptibly heaving
with the sea." In Haydon's pictures Keats continued to see, as the friends
and companions of every ardent and persuasive worker in the arts are apt
to see, not so much the actual performance, as the idea he had
pre-conceived of it in the light of his friend's intentions and
enthusiasm. At this time Haydon, who had already made several drawings of
Keats's head in order to introduce it in his picture of Christ entering
Jerusalem, proposed to make another more finished, "to be engraved,"
writes Keats, "in the first style, and put at the head of my poem, saying,
at the same time, he had never done the thing for any human being, and
that it must have considerable effect, as he will put his name to it."
Both poet and publisher were delighted with this condescension on the part
of the sublime Haydon; who failed, however, to carry out his promise. "My
neglect," said Haydon long afterwards, "really gave him a pang, as it now
does me."

With Hunt also Keats's intercourse continued frequent, while with Reynolds
his intimacy grew daily closer. Both of these friendships had a
stimulating influence on his poetic powers. "The Wednesday before last
Shelley, Hunt, and I, wrote each a sonnet on the river Nile," he tells his
brothers on the 16th of February, 1818. "I have been writing, at
intervals, many songs and sonnets, and I long to be at Teignmouth to read
them over to you." With the help of Keats's manuscripts or of the
transcripts made from them by his friends, it is possible to retrace the
actual order of many of these fugitive pieces. On the 16th of January was
written the humorous sonnet on Mrs Reynolds's cat; on the 21st, after
seeing in Leigh Hunt's possession a lock of hair reputed to be Milton's,
the address to that poet beginning 'Chief of organic numbers!'--and on the
22nd the sonnet, 'O golden tongued Romance with serene lute,' in which
Keats describes himself as laying aside (apparently) his Spenser, in order
to read again the more rousing and human-passionate pages of _Lear_. On
the 31st he sends in a letter to Reynolds the lines to Apollo beginning
'Hence Burgundy, Claret, and Port,' and in the same letter the sonnet
beginning 'When I have fears that I may cease to be,' which he calls his
last. On the 3rd of February he wrote the spirited lines to Robin Hood,
suggested by a set of sonnets by Reynolds on Sherwood Forest; on the 4th,
the sonnet beginning 'Time's sea has been five years at its slow ebb,' in
which he recalls the memory of an old, otherwise unrecorded love-fancy,
and also the well-known sonnet on the Nile, written at Hunt's in
competition with that friend and with Shelley; on the 5th, another sonnet
postponing compliance for the present with an invitation of Leigh Hunt's
to compose something in honour, or in emulation of Spenser; and on the
8th, the sonnet in praise of the colour blue composed by way of protest
against one of Reynolds. About the same time Keats agreed with Reynolds
that they should each write some metrical tales from Boccaccio, and
publish them in a joint volume; and began at once for his own part with
_Isabella_ or _the Pot of Basil_. A little later in this so prolific month
of February we find him rejoicing in the song of the thrush and blackbird,
and melted into feelings of indolent pleasure and receptivity under the
influence of spring winds and dissolving rain. He theorizes pleasantly in
a letter to Reynolds on the virtues and benefits of this state of mind,
translating the thrush's music into some blank-verse lines of a singular
and haunting melody. In the course of the next fortnight we find him in
correspondence with Taylor about the corrections to _Endymion_; and soon
afterwards making a clearance of borrowed books, and otherwise preparing
to flit. His brother George, who had been taking care of Tom at
Teignmouth since December, was now obliged to come to town, bent on a
scheme of marriage and emigration; and Tom's health having made a
momentary rally, Keats was unwilling that he should leave Teignmouth, and
determined to join him there. He started in the second week of March, and
stayed almost two months. It was an unlucky season for weather--the
soft-buffeting sheets and misty drifts of Devonshire rain renewing
themselves, in the inexhaustible way all lovers of that country know,
throughout almost the whole spring, and preventing him from getting more
than occasional tantalizing snatches of enjoyment in the beauty of the
scenery, the walks, and flowers. His letters are full of objurgations
against the climate, conceived in a spirit which seems hardly compatible,
in one of his strong family feeling, with the tradition which represents
his father to have been a Devonshire man:--

    "You may say what you will of Devonshire: the truth is, it is a
    splashy, rainy, misty, snowy, foggy, haily, floody, muddy, slipshod
    county. The hills are very beautiful, when you get a sight of 'em; the
    primroses are out,--but then you are in; the cliffs are of a fine deep
    colour, but then the clouds are continually vieing with them."... "I
    fancy the very air of a deteriorating quality. I fancy the flowers,
    all precocious, have an Acrasian spell about them; I feel able to beat
    off the Devonshire waves like soap-froth. I think it well for the
    honour of Britain, that Julius Caesar did not first land in this
    county: A Devonshirer, standing on his native hills, is not a distinct
    object; he does not show against the light; a wolf or two would
    dispossess him[31]."

Besides his constant occupation in watching and cheering his invalid
brother, who had a relapse just after he came down, Keats was busy during
these Devonshire days seeing through the press the last sheets of
_Endymion_. He also composed, with the exception of the few verses he had
begun at Hampstead, the whole of _Isabella_, the first of his longer poems
written with real maturity of art and certainty of touch. At the same time
he was reading and appreciating Milton as he had never done before. With
the minor poems he had been familiar from a boy, but had not been
attracted by _Paradise Lost_, until first Severn, and then more
energetically Bailey, had insisted that this was a reproach to him: and he
now turned to that poem, and penetrated with the grasp and swiftness of
genius, as his marginal criticisms show, into the very essence of its
power and beauty. His correspondence with his friends, particularly Bailey
and Reynolds, is during this same time unusually sustained and full. It
was in all senses manifestly a time with Keats of rapidly maturing power,
and in some degree also of threatening gloom. The mysteries of existence
and of suffering, and the 'deeps of good and evil,' were beginning for the
first time to press habitually on his thoughts. In that beautiful and
interesting letter to Reynolds, in which he makes the comparison of human
life to a mansion of many apartments, it is his own present state which he
thus describes:--

    "We no sooner get into the second chamber, which I shall call the
    Chamber of Maiden-thought, than we become intoxicated with the light
    and the atmosphere. We see nothing but pleasant wonders, and think of
    delaying there for ever in delight. However, among the effects this
    breathing is father of, is that tremendous one of sharpening one's
    vision into the heart and nature of man, of convincing one's nerves
    that the world is full of misery and heartbreak, pain, sickness, and
    oppression; whereby this Chamber of Maiden-thought becomes gradually
    darkened, and at the same time, on all sides of it, many doors are set
    open--but all dark--all leading to dark passages. We see not the
    balance of good and evil; we are in a mist, _we_ are in that state, we
    feel the 'Burden of the Mystery.'"

A few weeks earlier, addressing to the same friend the last of his rhymed
_Epistles_, Keats had thus expressed the mood which came upon him as he
sat taking the beauty of the evening on a rock at the sea's edge:--

                     "twas a quiet eve,
  The rocks were silent, the wide sea did weave
  An untumultuous fringe of silver foam
  Along the flat brown sand; I was at home
  And should have been most happy,--but I saw
  Too far into the sea, where every maw
  The greater or the less feeds evermore:--
  But I saw too distinct into the core
  Of an eternal fierce destruction,
  And so from happiness I far was gone.
  Still am I sick of it, and tho' to-day,
  I've gathered young spring leaves, and flowers gay
  Of periwinkle and wild strawberry,
  Still do I that most fierce destruction see,--
  The Shark at savage prey,--the Hawk at pounce,--
  The gentle Robin, like a Pard or Ounce,
  Ravening a worm,--Away, ye horrid moods!
  Moods of one's mind!"--

In a like vein, recalling to Bailey a chance saying of his "Why should
woman suffer?"--"Aye, why should she?" writes Keats: "'By heavens, I'd
coin my very soul, and drop my blood for drachmas.' These things are, and
he who feels how incompetent the most skyey knight-errantry is to heal
this bruised fairness, is like a sensitive leaf on the hot hand of
thought." And again, "were it in my choice, I would reject a Petrarchal
coronation--on account of my dying day, and because women have cancers. I
should not by rights speak in this tone to you, for it is an incendiary
spirit that would do so."

Not the general tribulations of the race only, but particular private
anxieties, were pressing in these days on Keats's thoughts. The shadow of
illness, though it had hitherto scarcely touched himself, hung menacingly
not only over his brother but his best friends. He speaks of it in a tone
of courage and gaiety which his real apprehensions, we can feel, belie.
"Banish money"--he had written in Falstaff's vein, at starting for the
Isle of Wight a year ago--"Banish sofas--Banish wine--Banish music; but
right Jack Health, honest Jack Health, true Jack Health--Banish Health and
banish all the world." Writing now from Teignmouth to Reynolds, who was
down during these weeks with rheumatic fever, he complains laughingly, but
with an undercurrent of sad foreboding, how he can go nowhere but Sickness
is of the company, and says his friends will have to cut that fellow, or
he must cut them.

Nearer and more pressing than such apprehensions was the pain of a family
break-up now imminent. George Keats had made up his mind to emigrate to
America, and embark his capital, or as much of it as he could get
possession of, in business there. Besides the wish to push his own
fortunes, a main motive of this resolve on George's part was the desire to
be in a position as quickly as possible to help, or if need be support,
his poet-brother. He persuaded the girl to whom he had long been attached,
Miss Wylie, to share his fortunes, and it was settled that they were to be
married and sail early in the summer. Keats came up from Teignmouth in May
to see the last of his brother, and he and Tom settled again in their old
lodgings in Well Walk. He had a warm affection and regard for his new
sister-in-law, and was in so far delighted for George's sake. But at the
same time he felt life and its prospects overcast. He writes to Bailey,
after his outburst about the sufferings of women, that he is never alone
now without rejoicing that there is such a thing as death--without placing
his ultimate in the glory of dying for a great human purpose. And after
recounting his causes of depression, he recovers himself, and
concludes:--"Life must be undergone; and I certainly derive some
consolation from the thought of writing one or two more poems before it
ceases."

With reference to his poem then just appearing, and the year's work which
it represented, Keats was under no illusions whatever. From an early
period in its composition he had fully realised its imperfections, and had
written: "My ideas of it are very low, and I would write the subject
thoroughly again, but I am tired of it, and think the time would be better
spent in writing a new romance, which I have in my eye for next summer.
Rome was not built in a day, and all the good I expect from my employment
this summer is the fruit of experience which I hope to gather in my next
poem." The habit of close self-observation and self-criticism is in most
natures that possess it allied with vanity and egoism; but it was not so
in Keats, who without a shadow of affectation judges himself, both in his
strength and weakness, as the most clear-sighted and disinterested friend
might judge. He shows himself perfectly aware that in writing _Endymion_
he has rather been working off a youthful ferment of the mind than
producing a sound or satisfying work of poetry; and when the time comes
to write a preface to the poem, after a first attempt lacking reticence
and simplicity, and abandoned at the advice of Reynolds, he in the second
quietly and beautifully says of his own work all that can justly be said
in its dispraise. He warns the reader to expect "great inexperience,
immaturity, and every error denoting a feverish attempt, rather than a
deed accomplished," and adds most unboastfully:--"it is just that this
youngster should die away: a sad thought for me, if I had not some hope
that while it is dwindling I may be plotting, and fitting myself for
verses fit to live."

The apprehensions expressed in these words have not been fulfilled; and
_Endymion_, so far from having died away, lives to illustrate the maxim
conveyed in its own now proverbial opening line. Immature as the poem
truly is in touch and method, superabundant and confused as are the sweets
which it offers to the mind, still it is a thing of far too much beauty,
or at least of too many beauties, to perish. Every reader must take
pleasure in some of its single passages and episodes, while to the student
of the poetic art the work is interesting almost as much in its weakness
as its strength.





CHAPTER V.

    _Endymion._


In the old Grecian world, the myth of Endymion and Selene was one deeply
rooted in various shapes in the popular traditions both of Elis in the
Peloponnese, and of the Ionian cities about the Latmian gulf in Caria. The
central feature of the tale, as originally sung by Sappho, was the nightly
descent of the goddess to kiss her lover where he lay spell-bound, by the
grace of Zeus, in everlasting sleep and everlasting youth on Mount Latmos.
The poem of Sappho is lost, and the story is not told at length in any of
our extant classical writings, but only by way of allusion in some of the
poets, as Theocritus, Apollonius Rhodius, and Ovid, and of the late
prose-writers, as Lucian, Apollodorus, and Pausanias. Of such ancient
sources Keats of course knew only what he found in his classical
dictionaries. But references to the tale, as every one knows, form part of
the stock repertory of classical allusion in modern literature: and
several modern writers before Keats had attempted to handle the subject at
length. In his own special range of Elizabethan reading, he was probably
acquainted with Lyly's court comedy of _Endimion_, in prose, which had
been edited, as it happened, by his friend Dilke a few years before: but
in it he would have found nothing to his purpose. On the other hand I
think he certainly took hints from the _Man in the Moon_ of Michael
Drayton. In this piece Drayton takes hold of two post-classical notions
concerning the Endymion myth, both in the first instance derived from
Lucian,--one that which identifies its hero with the visible 'man in the
moon' of popular fancy,--the other that which rationalises his story, and
explains him away as a personification or mythical representative of early
astronomy. These two distinct notions Drayton weaves together into a short
tale in rhymed heroics, which he puts into the mouth of a shepherd at a
feast of Pan. Like most of his writings, the _Man in the Moon_ has strong
gleams of poetry and fancy amidst much that is both puerile and pedantic.
Critics, so far as I know, have overlooked Keats's debt to it: but even
granting that he may well have got elsewhere, or invented for himself, the
notion of introducing his story with a festival in honour of Pan--do not,
at any rate, the following lines of Drayton contain evidently the hint for
the wanderings on which Keats sends his hero (and for which antiquity
affords no warrant) through earth, sea, and air[32]?--

                      "Endymion now forsakes
  All the delights that shepherds do prefer,
  And sets his mind so generally on her
  That, all neglected, to the groves and springs
  He follows Phoebe, that him safely brings
  (As their great queen) unto the nymphish bowers,
  Where in clear rivers beautified with flowers
  The silver Naides bathe them in the bracke.
  Sometime with her the sea-horse he doth back
  Among the blue Nereides: and when
  Weary of waters goddess-like again
  She the high mountains actively assays,
  And there amongst the light Oriades,
  That ride the swift roes, Phoebe doth resort:
  Sometime amongst those that with them comport
  The Hamadriades, doth the woods frequent;
  And there she stays not, but incontinent
  Calls down the dragons that her chariot draw,
  And with Endymion pleased that she saw,
  Mounteth thereon, in twinkling of an eye
  Stripping the winds----"

Fletcher again, a writer with whom Keats was very familiar, and whose
inspiration, in the idyllic and lyric parts of his work, is closely
kindred to his own--Fletcher in the _Faithful Shepherdess_ makes Chloe
tell, in lines beautifully paraphrased and amplified from Theocritus--

  "How the pale Phoebe, hunting in a grove,
  First saw the boy Endymion, from whose eyes
  She took eternal fire that never dies;
  How she convey'd him softly in a sleep,
  His temples bound with poppy, to the steep
  Head of old Latmus, where she stoops each night,
  Gilding the mountain with her brother's light,
  To kiss her sweetest."

The subject thus touched by Drayton and Fletcher had been long, as we have
seen already, in Keats's thoughts. Not only had the charm of this old
pastoral nature-myth of the Greeks interwoven itself in his being with his
natural sensibility to the physical and spiritual spell of moonlight: but
deeper and more abstract meanings than its own had gathered about the
story in his mind. The divine vision which haunts Endymion in dreams is
for Keats symbolical of Beauty itself, and it is the passion of the human
soul for beauty which he attempts, more or less consciously, to shadow
forth in the quest of the shepherd-prince after his love[33].

The manner in which Keats set about relating the Greek story, as he had
thus conceived it, was as far from being a Greek or 'classical' manner as
possible. He indeed resembles the Greeks, as we have seen, in his vivid
sense of the joyous and multitudinous life of nature: and he loved to
follow them in dreaming of the powers of nature as embodied in concrete
shapes of supernatural human activity and grace. Moreover, his intuitions
for every kind of beauty being admirably swift and true, when he sought to
conjure up visions of the classic past, or images from classic fable, he
was able to do so often magically well. To this extent Keats may justly be
called, as he has been so often called, a Greek, but no farther. The
rooted artistic instincts of that race, the instincts which taught them in
all the arts alike, during the years when their genius was most itself, to
select and simplify, rejecting all beauties but the vital and essential,
and paring away their material to the quick that the main masses might
stand out unconfused, in just proportions and with outlines rigorously
clear--these instincts had neither been implanted in Keats by nature, nor
brought home to him by precept and example. Alike by his aims and his
gifts, he was in his workmanship essentially 'romantic,' Gothic, English.
A general characteristic of his favourite Elizabethan poetry is its
prodigality of incidental and superfluous beauties: even in the drama, it
takes the powers of a Shakspere to keep the vital play of character and
passion unsmothered by them, and in most narrative poems of the age the
quality is quite unchecked. To Keats, at the time when he wrote
_Endymion_, such incidental and secondary luxuriance constituted an
essential, if not the chief, charm of poetry. "I think poetry," he says,
"should surprise by a fine excess:" and with reference to his own poem
during its progress, "it will be a test, a trial of my powers of
imagination, and chiefly of my invention--which is a rare thing indeed--by
which I must make 4000 lines of one bare circumstance, and fill them with
poetry."

The 'one bare circumstance' of the story was in the result expanded
through four long books of intricate and flowery narrative, in the course
of which the young poet pauses continually to linger or deviate,
amplifying every incident into a thousand circumstances, every passion
into a world of subtleties. He interweaves with his central Endymion myth
whatever others pleased him best, as those of Pan, of Venus and Adonis, of
Cybele, of Alpheus and Arethusa, of Glaucus and Scylla, of Circe, of
Neptune, and of Bacchus; leading us through labyrinthine transformations,
and on endless journeyings by subterranean antres and aërial gulfs and
over the floor of ocean. The scenery of the tale, indeed, is often not
merely of a Gothic vastness and intricacy; there is something of Oriental
bewilderment,--an Arabian Nights jugglery with space and time,--in the
vague suddenness with which its changes are effected. Such organic plan as
the poem has can best be traced by fixing our attention on the main
divisions adopted by the author of his narrative into books, and by
keeping hold at the same time, wherever we can, of the thread of allegoric
thought and purpose that seems to run loosely through the whole. The first
book, then, is entirely introductory, and does no more than set forth the
predicament of the love-sick shepherd-prince, its hero; who appears at a
festival of his people held in honour of the god Pan, and is afterwards
induced by his sister Peona[34] to confide to her the secret of the
passion which consumes him. The account of the feast of Pan contains
passages which in the quality of direct nature-interpretation are scarcely
to be surpassed in poetry:--

                "rain-scented eglantine
  Gave temperate sweets to that well-wooing sun;
  The lark was lost in him; cold springs had run
  To warm their chilliest bubbles in the grass;
  Man's voice was on the mountains; and the mass
  Of nature's lives and wonders puls'd tenfold,
  To feel this sun-rise and its glories old."

What can be more fresh and stirring?--what happier in rhythmical
movement?--or what more characteristic of the true instinct by which
Keats, in dealing with nature, avoided word-painting and palette-work,
leaving all merely visible beauties, the stationary world of colours and
forms, as they should be left, to the painter, and dealing, as poetry
alone is able to deal, with those delights which are felt and divined
rather than seen, with the living activities and operant magic of the
earth? Not less excellent is the realisation, in the course of the same
episode, of the true spirit of ancient pastoral life and worship; the hymn
to Pan in especial both expressing perfectly the meaning of the Greek myth
to Greeks, and enriching it with touches of northern feeling that are
foreign to, and yet most harmonious with, the original. Keats having got
from Drayton, as I surmise, his first notion of an introductory feast of
Pan, in his hymn to that divinity borrowed recognizable touches alike from
Chapman's Homer's hymn, from the sacrifice to Pan in Browne's
_Britannia's Pastorals_[35], and from the hymns in Ben Jonson's masque,
_Pan's Anniversary_: but borrowed as only genius can, fusing and
refashioning whatever he took from other writers in the strong glow of an
imagination fed from the living sources of nature:--

  "O Thou, whose mighty palace roof doth hang
  From jagged trunks, and overshadoweth
  Eternal whispers, glooms, the birth, life, death
  Of unseen flowers in heavy peacefulness;
  Who lov'st to see the hamadryads dress
  Their ruffled locks where meeting hazels darken;
  And through whole solemn hours dost sit, and hearken
  The dreary melody of bedded reeds--
  In desolate places, where dank moisture breeds
  The pipy hemlock to strange overgrowth;
  Bethinking thee, how melancholy loth
  Thou wast to lose fair Syrinx--do thou now,
  By thy love's milky brow!
  By all the trembling mazes that she ran,
  Hear us, great Pan!

      *       *       *       *       *

    O Hearkener to the loud clapping shears,
  While ever and anon to his shorn peers
  A ram goes bleating: Winder of the horn,
  When snouted wild-boars routing tender corn
  Anger our huntsman: Breather round our farms,
  To keep off mildews, and all weather harms:
  Strange ministrant of undescribed sounds,
  That come a-swooning over hollow grounds,
  And wither drearily on barren moors:
  Dread opener of the mysterious doors
  Leading to universal knowledge--see,
  Great son of Dryope,
  The many that are come to pay their vows
  With leaves about their brows!"

In the subsequent discourse of Endymion and Peona he tells her the story
of those celestial visitations which he scarce knows whether he has
experienced or dreamed. In Keats's conception of his youthful heroes there
is at all times a touch, not the wholesomest, of effeminacy and physical
softness, and the influence of passion he is apt to make fever and unman
them quite: as indeed a helpless and enslaved submission of all the
faculties to love proved, when it came to the trial, to be a weakness of
his own nature. He partly knew it, and could not help it: but the
consequence is that the love-passages of _Endymion_, notwithstanding the
halo of beautiful tremulous imagery that often plays about them, can
scarcely be read with pleasure. On the other hand, in matters of
subordinate feeling he shows not only a great rhetorical facility, but the
signs often of lively dramatic power; as for instance in the remonstrance
wherein Peona tries to make her brother ashamed of his weakness:--

              "Is this the cause?
  This all? Yet it is strange, and sad, alas!
  That one who through this middle earth should pass
  Most like a sojourning demi-god, and leave
  His name upon the harp-string, should achieve
  No higher bard than simple maidenhood,
  Sighing alone, and fearfully,--how the blood
  Left his young cheek; and how he used to stray
  He knew not where; and how he would say, _Nay_,
  If any said 'twas love: and yet 'twas love;
  What could it be but love? How a ring-dove
  Let fall a sprig of yew-tree in his path;
  And how he died: and then, that love doth scathe
  The gentle heart, as Northern blasts do roses.
  And then the ballad of his sad life closes
  With sighs, and an alas! Endymion!"

In the second book the hero sets out in quest of his felicity, and is led
by obscure signs and impulses through a mysterious and all but trackless
region of adventure. In the first vague imaginings of youth, conceptions
of natural and architectural marvels, unlocalised and half-realised in
mysterious space, are apt to fill a large part: and to such imaginings
Keats in this book lets himself go without a check. A Naiad, in the
disguise of a butterfly, leads Endymion to her spring, and there reveals
herself and bids him be of good hope: an airy voice next invites him to
descend 'Into the sparry hollows of the world': which done, he gropes his
way to a subterranean temple of dim and most un-Grecian magnificence,
where he is admitted to the presence of the sleeping Adonis, and whither
Venus herself presently repairing gives him encouragement. Thence, urged
by the haunting passion within him, he wanders on by dizzy paths and
precipices, and forests of leaping, ever-changing fountains. Through all
this phantasmagoria engendered by a brain still teeming with the rich
first fumes of boyish fancy, and in great part confusing and
inappropriate, shine out at intervals strokes of the true old-world poetry
admirably felt and expressed:--

  "He sinks adown a solitary glen,
  Where there was never sound of mortal men,
  Saving, perhaps, some snow-light cadences
  Melting to silence, when upon the breeze
  Some holy bark let forth an anthem sweet
  To cheer itself to Delphi:"--

or presences of old religion strongly conceived and realised:--

  "Forth from a rugged arch, in the dusk below,
  Came mother Cybele--alone--alone--
  In sombre chariot; dark foldings thrown
  About her majesty, and front death-pale,
  With turrets crowned."

After seeing the vision of Cybele, Endymion, still travelling through the
bowels of the earth, is conveyed on an eagle's back down an unfathomable
descent, and alighting, presently finds a 'jasmine bower,' whither his
celestial mistress again stoops to visit him. Next he encounters the
streams, and hears the voices, of Arethusa and Alpheus on their fabled
flight to Ortygia: as they disappear down a chasm, he utters a prayer to
his goddess in their behalf, and then--

  "He turn'd--there was a whelming sound--he stept,
  There was a cooler light; and so he kept
  Towards it by a sandy path, and lo!
  More suddenly than doth a moment go,
  The visions of the earth were gone and fled--
  He saw the giant sea above his head."

Hitherto Endymion has been wholly absorbed in his own passion and
adventures: but now the fates of others claim his sympathy: first those of
Alpheus and Arethusa, and next, throughout nearly the whole of the third
book, those of Glaucus and Scylla. Keats handles this latter legend with
great freedom, omitting its main point, the transformation of Scylla by
Circe into a devouring monster, and making the enchantress punish her
rival not by this vile metamorphosis, but by death; or rather a trance
resembling death, from which after many ages Glaucus is enabled by
Endymion's help to rescue her, and together with her the whole sorrowful
fellowship of true lovers drowned at sea. From the point in the hero's
submarine adventures where he first meets Glaucus,--

  "He saw far in the green concave of the sea
  An old man sitting calm and peacefully.
  Upon a weeded rock this old man sat,
  And his white hair was awful, and a mat
  Of weeds was cold beneath his cold thin feet"--

--from this passage to the end of the book, in spite of redundance and
occasional ugly flaws, Keats brings home his version of the myth with
strong and often exquisite effect to the imagination. No picture can well
be more vivid than that of Circe pouring the magic phial upon her victims:
and no speech much more telling than that with which the detected
enchantress turns and scathes her unhappy lover. In the same book the
description of the sunk treasures cumbering the ocean-floor challenges
comparison, not all unequally, with the famous similar passage in
Shakspere's _Richard III._ In the halls of Neptune Endymion again meets
Venus, and receives from her more explicit encouragement than heretofore.
Thence Nereids bear him earthward in a trance, during which he reads in
spirit words of still more reassuring omen written in starlight on the
dark. Since, in his adventure with Glaucus, he has allowed himself to be
diverted from his own quest for the sake of relieving the sorrows of
others, the hope which before seemed ever to elude him draws at last
nearer to fulfilment.

It might seem fanciful to suppose that Keats had really in his mind a
meaning such as this, but for the conviction he habitually declares that
the pursuit of beauty as an aim in life is only justified when it is
accompanied by the idea of devotion to human service. And in his fourth
book he leads his hero through a chain of adventures which seem certainly
to have a moral and allegorical meaning or none at all. Returning, in that
book, to upper air, Endymion before long half forgets his goddess for the
charms of an Indian maiden, the sound of whose lamentations reaches him
while he is sacrificing in the forest, and who tells him how she has come
wandering in the train of Bacchus from the east. This mysterious Indian
maiden proves in fact to be no other than his goddess herself in disguise.
But it is long before he discovers this, and in the mean time he is
conducted by her side through a bewildering series of aerial ascents,
descents, enchanted slumbers and Olympian visions. All these, with his
infidelity which is no infidelity after all, his broodings in the Cave of
Quietude, his illusions and awakenings, his final farewell to mortality
and to Peona, and reunion with his celestial mistress in her own shape,
make up a narrative inextricably confused, which only becomes partially
intelligible when we take it as a parable of a soul's experience in
pursuit of the ideal. Let a soul enamoured of the ideal--such would seem
the argument--once suffer itself to forget its goal, and to quench for a
time its longings in the real, nevertheless it will be still haunted by
that lost vision; amidst all intoxications, disappointment and lassitude
will still dog it, until it awakes at last to find that the reality which
has thus allured it derives from the ideal its power to charm,--that it is
after all but a reflection from the ideal, a phantom of it. What chiefly
or alone makes the episode poetically acceptable is the strain of lyric
poetry which Keats has put into the mouth of the supposed Indian maiden
when she tells her story. His later and more famous lyrics, though they
are free from the faults and immaturities which disfigure this, yet do
not, to my mind at least, show a command over such various sources of
imaginative and musical effect, or touch so thrillingly so many chords of
the spirit. A mood of tender irony and wistful pathos like that of the
best Elizabethan love-songs; a sense as keen as Heine's of the immemorial
romance of India and the East; a power like that of Coleridge, and perhaps
partly caught from him, of evoking the remotest weird and beautiful
associations almost with a word; clear visions of Greek beauty and wild
wood-notes of Celtic imagination; all these elements come here commingled,
yet in a strain perfectly individual. Keats calls the piece a
'roundelay,'--a form which it only so far resembles that its opening
measures are repeated at the close. It begins with a tender invocation to
sorrow, and then with a first change of movement conjures up the image of
a deserted maidenhood beside Indian streams; till suddenly, with another
change, comes the irruption of the Asian Bacchus on his march; next
follows the detailed picture of the god and of his rout, suggested in part
by the famous Titian at the National Gallery; and then, arranged as if for
music, the challenge of the maiden to the Maenads and Satyrs, and their
choral answers:

  "'Whence came ye, merry Damsels! Whence came ye!
  So many, and so many, and such glee?
  Why have ye left your bowers desolate,
      Your lutes, and gentler fate?'
  'We follow Bacchus, Bacchus on the wing,
      A conquering!
  Bacchus, young Bacchus! good or ill betide,
  We dance before him thorough kingdoms wide:--
  Come hither, lady fair, and joined be
      To our wild minstrelsy!'

  'Whence came ye, jolly Satyrs! Whence came ye!
    So many, and so many, and such glee?
    Why have ye left your forest haunts, why left
    Your nuts in oak-tree cleft?'--

  'For wine, for wine we left our kernel tree;
  For wine we left our heath, and yellow brooms,
        And cold mushrooms;
  For wine we follow Bacchus through the earth;
  Great God of breathless cups and chirping mirth!--
  Come hither, lady fair, and joined be
        To our mad minstrelsy!'"

The strophes recounting the victorious journeys are very unequal; and
finally, returning to the opening motive, the lyric ends as it began with
an exquisite strain of lovelorn pathos:--

            "Come then, sorrow!
            Sweetest sorrow!
  Like an own babe I nurse thee on my breast:
            I thought to leave thee,
            And deceive thee,
  But now of all the world I love thee best.
            There is not one,
            No, no, not one
  But thee to comfort a poor lonely maid;
            Thou art her mother
            And her brother,
  Her playmate, and her wooer in the shade."

The high-water-mark of poetry in _Endymion_ is thus reached in the two
lyrics of the first and fourth book. Of these at least may be said with
justice that which Jeffrey was inclined to say of the poem as a whole,
that the degree to which any reader appreciates them will furnish as good
a test as can be obtained of his having in him "a native relish for
poetry, and a genuine sensibility to its intrinsic charm." In the main
body of the work, beauties and faults are so bound up together that a
critic may well be struck almost as much by one as by the other. Admirable
truth and charm of imagination, exquisite freshness and felicity of touch,
mark such brief passages as we have quoted above: the very soul of poetry
breathes in them, and in a hundred others throughout the work: but read
farther, and you will in almost every case be brought up by hardly
tolerable blemishes of execution and of taste. Thus in the tale told by
Glaucus, we find a line of strong poetic vision such as--

  "Ææa's isle was wondering at the moon,"

standing alone in a passage of rambling and ineffective over-honeyed
narrative; or again, a couplet forced and vulgar like this both in rhyme
and expression--

  "I look'd--'twas Scylla! Cursed, cursed Circe!
  O vulture-witch, hast never heard of mercy?"

is followed three lines farther on by a masterly touch of imagination and
the heart:--

                      "Cold, O cold indeed
  Were her fair limbs, and like a common weed
  The sea-swell took her hair."

One, indeed, of the besetting faults of his earlier poetry Keats has
shaken off--his muse is seldom tempted now to echo the familiar
sentimental chirp of Hunt's. But that tendency which he by nature shared
with Hunt, the tendency to linger and luxuriate over every imagined
pleasure with an over-fond and doting relish, is still strong in him. And
to the weaknesses native to his own youth and temperament are joined
others derived from an exclusive devotion to the earlier masters of
English poetry. The creative impulse of the Elizabethan age, in its
waywardness and lack of discipline and discrimination, not less than in
its luxuriant strength and freshness, seems actually revived in him. He
outdoes even Spenser in his proneness to let Invention ramble and loiter
uncontrolled through what wildernesses she will, with Imagination at her
heels to dress if possible in living beauty the wonders that she finds
there: and sometimes Imagination is equal to the task and sometimes not:
and even busy Invention herself occasionally flags, and is content to
grasp at any idle clue the rhyme holds out to her:--

                    "--a nymph of Dian's
  Wearing a coronal of tender scions":--

                "Does yonder thrush,
  Schooling its half-fledged little ones to brush
  About the dewy forest, whisper tales?--
  Speak not of grief, young stranger, or cold snails
  Will slime the rose to-night."

Chapman especially among Keats's masters had this trick of letting thought
follow the chance dictation of rhyme. Spenser and Chapman--to say nothing
of Chatterton--had farther accustomed his ear to experimental and rash
dealings with their mother tongue. English was almost as unsettled a
language for him as for them; and he strives to extend its resources, and
make them adequate to the range and freshness of his imagery, by the use
of compound and other adjectival coinages in Chapman's
spirit--'far-spooming Ocean', 'eye-earnestly', 'dead-drifting', 'their
surly eyes brow-hidden', 'nervy knees', 'surgy murmurs'--coinages
sometimes legitimate or even happy, but often fantastic and tasteless: as
well as by sprinkling his nineteenth-century diction with such archaisms
as 'shent', 'sith', and 'seemlihed' from Spenser, 'eterne' from Spenser
and William Browne; or with arbitrary verbal forms, as 'to folly', 'to
monitor', 'gordian'd up', to 'fragment up'; or with neuter verbs used as
active, as to 'travel' an eye, to 'pace' a team of horses, and _vice
versa_. Hence even when in the other qualities of poetry his work is good,
in diction and expression it is apt to be lax and wavering, and full of
oddities and discords.

In rhythm Keats adheres in _Endymion_ to the method he had adopted in
_Sleep and Poetry_, deliberately keeping the sentence independent of the
metre, putting full pauses anywhere in his lines rather than at the end,
and avoiding any regular beat upon the rhyme. Leigh Hunt thought Keats had
carried this method too far, even to the negation of metre. Some later
critics have supposed the rhythm of _Endymion_ to have been influenced by
the _Pharonnida_ of Chamberlayne: a fourth-rate poet remarkable chiefly
for two things, for the inextricable trailing involution of his sentences,
exceeding that of the very worst prose of his time, and for a perverse
persistency in ending his heroic lines with the lightest
syllables--prepositions, adverbs and conjunctions--on which neither pause
nor emphasis is possible[36].

But Keats, even where his verse runs most diffusely, rarely fails in
delicacy of musical and metrical ear, or in variety and elasticity of
sentence structure. There is nothing in his treatment of the measure for
which precedent may not be found in the work of almost every poet who
employed it during the half-century that followed its brilliant revival
for the purposes of narrative poetry by Marlowe. At most, he can only be
said to make a rule of that which with the older poets was rather an
exception; and to seek affinities for him among the tedious by-ways of
provincial seventeenth-century verse seems quite superfluous.

As the best criticism on Keats's _Endymion_ is in his own preface, so its
best defence is in a letter he wrote six months after it was printed. "It
is as good," he says, "as I had power to make it by myself." Hunt had
warned him against the risks of a long poem, and Shelley against those of
hasty publication. From much in his performance that was exuberant and
crude the classical training and now ripening taste of Shelley might
doubtless have saved him, had he been willing to listen. But he was
determined that his poetry should at all times be the true spontaneous
expression of his mind. "Had I been nervous," he goes on, "about its being
a perfect piece, and with that view asked advice, and trembled over every
page, it would not have been written; for it is not in my nature to
fumble. I will write independently. I have written independently _without
judgment_. I may write independently and _with judgment_ hereafter. The
genius of poetry must work out its own salvation in a man. It cannot be
matured by law and precept, but by sensation and watchfulness in itself."
How well Keats was able to turn the fruits of experience to the benefit of
his art, how swift the genius of poetry in him was to work out, as he
says, its own salvation, we shall see when we come to consider his next
labours.




CHAPTER VI.

    Northern Tour--The _Blackwood_ and _Quarterly_ reviews--Death of Tom
    Keats--Removal to Wentworth Place--Fanny Brawne--Excursion to
    Chichester--Absorption in Love and Poetry--Haydon and Money
    Difficulties--Family Correspondence--Darkening Prospects--Summer at
    Shanklin and Winchester--Wise Resolutions--Return from Winchester.
    [June 1818-October, 1819.]


While Keats in the spring of 1818 was still at Teignmouth, with _Endymion_
on the eve of publication, he had been wavering between two different
plans for the immediate future. One was to go for a summer's walking tour
through Scotland with Charles Brown. "I have many reasons," he writes to
Reynolds, "for going wonder-ways; to make my winter chair free from
spleen; to enlarge my vision; to escape disquisitions on poetry, and
Kingston-criticism; to promote digestion and economize shoe-leather. I'll
have leather buttons and belt, and if Brown hold his mind, 'over the hills
we go.' If my books will keep me to it, then will I take all Europe in
turn, and see the kingdoms of the earth and the glory of them." A
fortnight later we find him inclining to give up this purpose under an
over-mastering sense of the inadequacy of his own attainments, and of the
necessity of acquiring knowledge, and ever more knowledge, to sustain the
flight of poetry:--

    "I was proposing to travel over the North this summer. There is but
    one thing to prevent me. I know nothing--I have read nothing--and I
    mean to follow Solomon's directions, 'Get learning--get
    understanding.' I find earlier days are gone by--I find that I can
    have no enjoyment in the world but continual drinking of knowledge. I
    find there is no worthy pursuit but the idea of doing some good to the
    world. Some do it with their society; some with their wit; some with
    their benevolence; some with a sort of power of conferring pleasure
    and good-humour on all they meet--and in a thousand ways, all dutiful
    to the command of great nature. There is but one way for me. The road
    lies through application, study, and thought. I will pursue it; and,
    for that end, purpose retiring for some years. I have been hovering
    for some time between an exquisite sense of the luxurious and a love
    for philosophy: were I calculated for the former I should be glad; but
    as I am not, I shall turn all my soul to the latter."

After he had come back to Hampstead in May, however, Keats allowed himself
to be persuaded, no doubt partly by considerations of health, and the
recollection of his failure to stand the strain of solitary thought a year
before, to resume his original intention. It was agreed between him and
Brown that they should accompany George Keats and his bride as far as
Liverpool, and then start on foot from Lancaster. They left London
accordingly on Monday, June 22[37]. The coach stopped for dinner the first
day at Redbourn near St Albans, where Keats's friend of medical-student
days, Mr Stephens, was in practice. He came to shake hands with the
travelling party at the poet's request, and many years afterwards wrote an
account of the interview, the chief point of which is a description of Mrs
George Keats. "Rather short, not what might be strictly called handsome,
but looked like a being whom any man of moderate sensibility might easily
love. She had the imaginative poetical cast. Somewhat singular and girlish
in her attire.... There was something original about her, and John seemed
to regard her as a being whom he delighted to honour, and introduced her
with evident satisfaction[38]." With no other woman or girl friend was
Keats ever on such easy and cordial terms of intimacy as with this 'Nymph
of the downward smile and side-long glance' of his early sonnet--'Sister
George' as she had now become; and for that reason, and on account of the
series of charming playful affectionate letters he wrote to her afterwards
in America, the portrait above quoted, such as it is, seems worth
preserving.

The farewells at Liverpool over, Keats and Brown went on by coach to
Lancaster, and thence began their walk, Keats taking for his reading one
book only, the little three-volume edition of Cary's _Dante_. "I cannot,"
writes Brown, "forget the joy, the rapture of my friend when he suddenly,
and for the first time, became sensible to the full effect of mountain
scenery. It was just before our descent to the village of Bowness, at a
turn of the road, when the lake of Windermere at once came into view....
All was enchantment to us both." Keats in his own letters says
comparatively little about the scenery, and that quite simply and quietly,
not at all with the descriptive enthusiasm of the modern picturesque
tourist; nor indeed with so much of that quality as the sedate and
fastidious Gray had shown in his itineraries fifty years before. The truth
is that an intensely active, intuitive genius for nature like his needs
not for its exercise the stimulus of the continued presence of beauty, but
on a minimum of experience can summon up and multiply for itself spirit
sunsets, and glories of dream and lake and mountain, richer and more
varied than the mere receptive lover of scenery, eager to enjoy but
impotent to create, can witness in a life-time of travel and pursuit.
Moreover, whatever the effect on him of that first burst of Windermere, it
is evident that as Keats proceeded northwards he found the scenery
somewhat foreign to his taste. Besides the familiar home beauties of
England, two ideals of landscape, classic and mediæval, haunted and
allured his imagination almost equally; that of the sunny and fabled
south, and that of the shadowed and adventurous north; and the Scottish
border, with its bleak and moorish, rain-swept and cloud-empurpled hills,
and its unhomely cold stone villages, struck him at first as answering to
neither. "I know not how it is, the clouds, the sky, the houses, all seem
anti-Grecian and anti-Charlemagnish."

A change, besides, was coming over Keats's thoughts and feelings whereby
scenery altogether was beginning to interest him less, and his
fellow-creatures more. In the acuteness of childish and boyish sensation,
among the suburban fields or on sea-side holidays, he had unconsciously
absorbed images of nature enough for his faculties to work on through a
life-time of poetry; and now, in his second chamber of Maiden-thought, the
appeal of nature yields in his mind to that of humanity. "Scenery is
fine," he had already written from Devonshire in the spring, "but human
nature is finer." In the Lake country, after climbing Skiddaw one morning
early, and walking to Treby the same afternoon, where they watched with
amusement the exercises in a country dancing-school: "There was as fine a
row of boys and girls," says Keats, "as you ever saw; some beautiful
faces, and one exquisite mouth. I never felt so near the glory of
patriotism, the glory of making, by any means, a country happier. This is
what I like better than scenery." The same note recurs frequently in
letters of a later date.

From Lancaster the travellers walked first to Ambleside; from Ambleside to
the foot of Helvellyn, where they slept, having called by the way on
Wordsworth at Rydal, and been disappointed to find him away
electioneering. From Helvellyn to Keswick, whence they made the circuit of
Derwentwater; Keswick to Treby, Treby to Wigton, and Wigton to Carlisle,
where they arrived on the 1st of July. Thence by coach to Dumfries,
visiting at the latter place the tomb and house of Burns, to whose memory
Keats wrote a sonnet, by no means in his best vein. From Dumfries they
started southwestwards for Galloway, a region little frequented even now,
and then hardly at all, by tourists. Reaching the Kirkcudbrightshire
coast, with its scenery at once wild and soft, its embosomed inlets and
rocky tufted headlands, its views over the glimmering Solway to the hazy
hills of Man, Brown bethought him that this was Guy Mannering's country,
and began to tell Keats about Meg Merrilies. Keats, who according to the
fashion of his circle was no enthusiast for Scott's poetry, and of the
Waverley novels had read the _Antiquary_ but not _Guy Mannering_, was much
struck; and presently, writes Brown,--"there was a little spot, close to
our pathway. 'There,' he said, 'in that very spot, without a shadow of
doubt, has old Meg Merrilies often boiled her kettle.' It was among pieces
of rock, and brambles, and broom, ornamented with a profusion of
honeysuckles and roses, and foxgloves, and all in the very blush and
fulness of blossom." As they went along, Keats composed on Scott's theme
the spirited ballad beginning 'Old Meg, she was a gipsy,' and stopping to
breakfast at Auchencairn, copied it out in a letter which he was writing
to his young sister at odd moments, and again in another letter which he
began at the same place to Tom. It was his way on his tour, and indeed
always, thus to keep by him the letters he was writing, and add scraps to
them as the fancy took him. The systematic Brown, on the other hand, wrote
regularly and uniformly in the evenings. "He affronts my indolence and
luxury," says Keats, "by pulling out of his knapsack, first his paper;
secondly his pens; and last, his ink. Now I would not care if he would
change a little. I say now, why not take out his pens first sometimes? But
I might as well tell a hen to hold up her head before she drinks, instead
of afterwards."

From Kirkcudbright they walked on July 5,--skirting the wild moors about
the Water of Fleet, and passing where Cairnsmore looks down over wooded
slopes to the steaming estuary of the Cree,--as far as Newton Stewart:
thence across the Wigtonshire levels by Glenluce to Stranraer and
Portpatrick. Here they took the Donaghadee packet for Ireland, with the
intention of seeing the Giant's Causeway, but finding the distances and
expense exceed their calculation, contented themselves with a walk to
Belfast, and crossed again to Portpatrick on the third day. In letters
written during and immediately after this excursion, Keats has some
striking passages of human observation and reflection:--

    "These Kirk-men have done Scotland good. They have made men, women,
    old men, young men, old women, young women, hags, girls, and infants,
    all careful; so they are formed into regular phalanges of savers and
    gainers.... These Kirk-men have done Scotland harm; they have banished
    puns, love, and laughing. To remind you of the fate of Burns:--poor,
    unfortunate fellow! his disposition was Southern! How sad it is when a
    luxurious imagination is obliged, in self-defence, to deaden its
    delicacy in vulgarity and in things attainable, that it may not have
    leisure to go mad after things that are not!... I would sooner be a
    wild deer, than a girl under the dominion of the Kirk; and I would
    sooner be a wild hog, than be the occasion of a poor creature's
    penance before those execrable elders."

    "On our return from Belfast we met a sedan--the Duchess of Dunghill.
    It was no laughing matter though. Imagine the worst dog-kennel you
    ever saw, placed upon two poles from a mouldy fencing. In such a
    wretched thing sat a squalid old woman, squat like an ape half-starved
    from a scarcity of biscuit in its passage from Madagascar to the Cape,
    with a pipe in her mouth and looking out with a round-eyed,
    skinny-lidded inanity, with a sort of horizontal idiotic movement of
    her head: squat and lean she sat, and puffed out the smoke, while two
    ragged, tattered girls carried her along. What a thing would be a
    history of her life and sensations!"--.

From Stranraer the friends made straight for Burns's country, walking
along the coast by Ballantrae, Girvan, Kirkoswald, and Maybole, to Ayr,
with the lonely mass of Ailsa Crag, and presently the mountains of Arran,
looming ever above the Atlantic floor on the left: and here again we find
Keats taking a keen pleasure in the mingled richness and wildness of the
coast scenery. They went to Kirk Alloway, and he was delighted to find the
home of Burns amid scenes so fair. He had made up his mind to write a
sonnet in the cottage of that poet's birth, and did so, but was worried by
the prate of the man in charge--"a mahogany-faced old jackass who knew
Burns: he ought to have been kicked for having spoken to him"--"his gab
hindered my sublimity: the flat dog made me write a flat sonnet." And
again, as they journeyed on toward Glasgow he composed with considerable
pains (as Brown particularly mentions) the lines beginning 'There is a
charm in footing slow across a silent plain.' They were meant to express
the temper in which his pilgrimage through the Burns country had been
made, but in spite of an occasional striking breadth and concentration of
imagery, are on the whole forced and unlike himself.

From Ayr Keats and Brown tramped on to Glasgow, and from Glasgow by
Dumbarton through the _Lady of the Lake_ country, which they found
vexatiously full of tourists, to Inverary, and thence by Loch Awe to Oban.
At Inverary Keats was amused and exasperated by a performance of _The
Stranger_ to an accompaniment of bagpipe music. Bathing in Loch Fyne the
next morning, he got horribly bitten by gadflies, and vented his smart in
a set of doggrel rhymes. The walk along the shores of Loch Awe impressed
him greatly, and for once he writes of it something like a set
description, for the benefit of his brother Tom. At the same point occur
for the first time complaints, slight at first, of fatigue and discomfort.
At the beginning of his tour Keats had written to his sister of its
effects upon his sleep and appetite: telling her how he tumbled into bed
"so fatigued that when I am asleep you might sew my nose to my great toe
and trundle me round the town, like a hoop, without waking me. Then I get
so hungry a ham goes but a very little way and fowls are like larks to
me.... I can eat a bull's head as easily as I used to do bull's eyes."
Presently he writes that he is getting used to it, and doing his twenty
miles or more a day without inconvenience. But now in the remoter parts of
the Highlands the coarse fare and accommodation, and rough journeys and
frequent drenchings, begin to tell upon both him and Brown, and he
grumbles at the perpetual diet of oatcake and eggs. Arrived at Oban, the
friends undertook one journey in especial which proved too much for
Keats's strength. Finding the regular tourist route by water to Staffa and
Iona too expensive, they were persuaded to take the ferry to the hither
side of the island of Mull, and then with a guide cross on foot to the
farther side opposite Iona: a wretched walk, as Keats calls it, of some
thirty-seven miles over difficult ground and in the very roughest weather.
By good luck the sky lifted at the critical moment, and the travellers had
a favourable view of Staffa. By the power of the past and its associations
in the one 'illustrious island,' and of nature's architecture in the
other, Keats shows himself naturally much impressed. Fingal's cave in
especial touched his imagination, and on it and its profanation by the
race of tourists he wrote, in the seven-syllable metre which no writer
since Ben Jonson has handled better or more vigorously, the lines
beginning 'Not Aladdin Magian.' Avoiding mere epithet-work and
description, like the true poet he is, he begins by calling up for
comparison the visions of other fanes or palaces of enchantment, and then,
bethinking himself of Milton's cry to Lycidas,

          "--where'er thy bones are hurl'd,
  Whether beyond the stormy Hebrides"--

imagines that lost one to have been found by the divinity of Ocean, and
put by him in charge of this cathedral of his building. In his priestly
character Lycidas tells his latter-day visitant of the religion of the
place, complains of the violation of its solitude, and ends, with a fine
abruptness which is the most effective stroke of art in the piece:--

  "So for ever I will leave
  Such a taint, and soon unweave
  All the magic of the place![39]

      *       *       *       *

  So saying, with a spirit's glance
  He dived--."

From the exertion and exposure which he underwent on his Scotch tour, and
especially in this Mull expedition, are to be traced the first distinct
and settled symptoms of failure in Keats's health, and of the development
of his hereditary tendency to consumption. In the same letter to his
brother Tom which contains the transcript of the Fingal poem, he speaks of
a 'slight sore throat,' and of being obliged to rest for a day or two at
Oban. Thence they pushed on in bad weather to Fort William, made the
ascent of Ben Nevis in a dissolving mist, and so by the 6th of August to
Inverness. Keats's throat had in the meantime been getting worse: the
ascent, and especially the descent, of Ben Nevis had, as he confesses,
tried him: feverish symptoms set in, and the doctor whom he consulted at
Inverness thought his condition threatening, and forbade him to continue
his tour. Accordingly he took passage on the 8th or 9th of August from the
port of Cromarty for London, leaving his companion to pursue his journey
alone,--"much lamenting," to quote Brown's own words, "the loss of his
beloved intelligence at my side." Keats in some degree picked up strength
during a nine days' sea passage, the humours of which he afterwards
described pleasantly in a letter to his brother George. But his throat
trouble, the premonitory sign of worse, never really or for any length of
time left him afterwards. On the 18th of August he arrived at Hampstead,
and made his appearance among his friends the next day, "as brown and as
shabby as you can imagine," writes Mrs Dilke, "scarcely any shoes left,
his jacket all torn at the back, a fur cap, a great plaid, and his
knapsack. I cannot tell what he looked like." When he found himself
seated, for the first time after his hardships, in a comfortable stuffed
chair, we are told how he expressed a comic enjoyment of the sensation,
quoting at himself the words in which Quince the carpenter congratulates
his gossip the weaver on his metamorphosis[40].

Simultaneously, almost, with Keats's return from the North appeared
attacks on him in _Blackwood's Magazine_ and the _Quarterly Review_. The
_Blackwood_ article, being No. IV. of a series bearing the signature 'Z'
on the 'Cockney School of Poetry,' was printed in the August number of the
magazine. The previous articles of the same series, as well as a letter
similarly signed, had been directed against Leigh Hunt, in a strain of
insult so preposterous as to be obviously inspired by the mere wantonness
of partisan licence. It is not quite certain who wrote them, but they were
most probably the work either of Lockhart or of Wilson, suggested and
perhaps revised by the publisher William Blackwood, at this time his own
sole editor. Not content with attacking Hunt's opinions, or his real
weaknesses as a writer or a man, his Edinburgh critics must needs heap on
him the grossest accusations of vice and infamy. In the course of these
articles allusion had several times been made to 'Johnny Keats' as an
'amiable bardling' and puling satellite of the arch-offender and king of
Cockaigne, Hunt. When now Keats's own turn came, his treatment was mild
in comparison with that of his supposed leader. The strictures on his work
are idle and offensive, but not more so than is natural to unsympathetic
persons full of prejudice and wishing to hurt. 'Cockney' had been in
itself a fair enough label for a hostile critic to fasten upon Hunt;
neither was it altogether inapplicable to Keats, having regard to the
facts of his origin and training: that is if we choose to forget that the
measure of a man is not his experience, but the use he is able to make of
it. The worst part of the Keats review was in its personalities,--"so back
to the shop, Mr John, stick to 'plasters, pills, ointment boxes,'
&c."--and what made these worse was the manner in which the materials for
them had been obtained. Keats's friend Bailey had by this time taken his
degree, and after publishing a friendly notice of _Endymion_ in the
_Oxford Herald_ for June, had left the University and gone to settle in a
curacy in Cumberland. In the course of the summer he staid at Stirling, at
the house of Bishop Gleig; whose son, afterwards the well-known writer and
Chaplain-general to the forces, was his friend, and whose daughter (a
previous love-affair with one of the Reynolds sisters having fallen
through) he soon afterwards married. Here Bailey met Lockhart, then in the
hey-day of his brilliant and bitter youth; lately admitted to the intimacy
of Scott; and earning, on the staff of _Blackwood_ and otherwise, the
reputation and the nickname of 'Scorpion.' Bailey, anxious to save Keats
from the sort of treatment to which Hunt had already been exposed, took
the opportunity of telling Lockhart in a friendly way his circumstances
and history, explaining at the same time that his attachment to Leigh Hunt
was personal and not political; pleading that he should not be made an
object of party denunciation; and ending with the request that at any
rate what had been thus said in confidence should not be used to his
disadvantage. To which Lockhart replied that certainly it should not be so
used by _him_. Within three weeks the article appeared, making use to all
appearance, and to Bailey's great indignation, of the very facts he had
thus confidentially communicated.

To the end of his life Bailey remained convinced that whether or not
Lockhart himself wrote the piece, he must at any rate have prompted and
supplied the materials for it[41]. It seems in fact all but certain that
he actually wrote it[42]. If so, it was a felon stroke on Lockhart's part,
and to forgive him we must needs remember all the gratitude that is his
due for his filial allegiance to and his immortal biography of Scott. But
even in that connection our grudge against him revives again; since in the
party violence of the time and place Scott himself was drawn into
encouraging the savage polemics of his young Edinburgh friends; and that
he was in some measure privy to the Cockney School outrages seems certain.
Such, at least, was the impression prevailing at the time[43]; and when
Severn, who did not know it, years afterwards innocently approached the
subject of Keats and his detractors in conversation with Scott at Rome, he
observed both in Scott and his daughter signs of pain and confusion which
he could only interpret in the same sense[44]. It is hard to say whether
the thought of the great-hearted Scott, the soul most free from jealousy
or harshness, thus associated with an act of stupid cruelty to genius, is
one to make us the more indignant against those who so misled him, or the
more patient of mistakes committed by commoner spirits among the
distracting cries and blind collisions of the world.

The _Quarterly_ article on _Endymion_ followed in the last week of
September (in the number dated April), and was in an equally contemptuous
strain; the writer professing to have been unable to read beyond the first
canto, or to make head or tail of that. In this case again the question of
authorship must remain uncertain: but Gifford, as editor, and an editor
who never shrank from cutting a contributor's work to his own pattern,
must bear the responsibility with posterity. The review is quite in his
manner, that of a man insensible to the higher charm of poetry, incapable
of judging it except by mechanical rule and precedent, and careless of the
pain he gives. Considering the perfect modesty and good judgment with
which Keats had in his preface pointed out the weaknesses of his own work,
the attacks are both alike inexcusable. They had the effect of promptly
rousing the poet's friends in his defence. Reynolds published a warm
rejoinder to the Quarterly reviewer in a west-country paper, the _Alfred_;
an indignant letter on the same side appeared in the _Morning Chronicle_
with the initials J. S.--those probably of John Scott, then editor of the
_London Magazine_, and soon afterwards killed by a friend of Lockhart's in
a duel, arising out of these very Blackwood brawls, in which it was
thought that Lockhart himself ought to have come forward. Leigh Hunt
reprinted Reynolds's letter, with some introductory words, in the
_Examiner_, and later in his life regretted that he had not done more. But
he could not have done more to any purpose. He was not himself an
enthusiastic admirer of _Endymion_, and had plainly said so to Keats and
to his friends. Reynolds's piece, which he reprinted, was quite effective
and to the point; and moreover any formal defence of Keats by Hunt would
only have increased the virulence of his enemies, as they both perfectly
well knew; folly and spite being always ready to cry out that praise of a
friend by a friend must needs be interested or blind.

Neither was Keats's demeanour under the lash such as could make his
friends suppose him particularly hurt. Proud in the extreme, he had no
irritable vanity; and aiming in his art, if not always steadily, yet
always at the highest, he rather despised than courted such success as he
saw some of his contemporaries enjoy:--"I hate," he says, "a mawkish
popularity." Even in the hopes of permanent fame which he avowedly
cherished, there was nothing intemperate or impatient; and he was
conscious of perceiving his own shortcomings at least as clearly as his
critics. Accordingly he took his treatment at their hands more coolly than
older and less sensitive men had taken the like. Hunt had replied
indignantly to his Blackwood traducers, repelling scorn with scorn.
Hazlitt endeavoured to have the law of them. Keats at the first sting
declared, indeed, that he would write no more poetry, but try to do what
good he could to the world in some other way. Then quickly recovering
himself, he with great dignity and simplicity treated the annoyance as one
merely temporary, indifferent, and external. When Mr Hessey sent for his
encouragement the extracts from the papers in which he had been defended,
he wrote:--

    "I cannot but feel indebted to those gentlemen who have taken my part.
    As for the rest, I begin to get a little acquainted with my own
    strength and weakness. Praise or blame has but a momentary effect on
    the man whose love of beauty in the abstract makes him a severe critic
    on his own works. My own domestic criticism has given me pain without
    comparison beyond what 'Blackwood' or the 'Quarterly' could possibly
    inflict: and also when I feel I am right, no external praise can give
    me such a glow as my own solitary reperception and ratification of
    what is fine."

    And again:--"There have been two letters in my defence in the
    'Chronicle,' and one in the 'Examiner,' copied from the Exeter paper,
    and written by Reynolds. I don't know who wrote those in the
    'Chronicle.' This is a mere matter of the moment: I think I shall be
    among the English Poets after my death. Even as a matter of present
    interest, the attempt to crush me in the 'Quarterly' has only brought
    me more into notice, and it is a common expression among book-men, 'I
    wonder the 'Quarterly' should cut its own throat.'"

In point of fact an unknown admirer from the west country sent Keats about
this time a letter and sonnet of sympathy, with which was enclosed a
further tribute in the shape of a £25 note. Keats was both pleased and
displeased: "if I had refused it," he says, "I should have behaved in a
very braggadocio dunderheaded manner; and yet the present galls me a
little." About the same time he received, through his friend Richard
Woodhouse, a young barrister who acted in some sort as literary adviser or
assistant to Messrs Taylor and Hessey[45], a glowing letter of sympathy
and encouragement from Miss Porter, 'of Romance celebrity': by which he
shows himself in his reply not more flattered than politeness demands.

Keats was really living, during the stress of these _Blackwood_ and
_Quarterly_ storms, under the pressure of another and far more heartfelt
trouble. His Hampstead friends, before they heard of his intended return
from Scotland, had felt reluctantly bound to write and summon him home on
account of the alarming condition of his brother Tom. He had left the
invalid behind in their lodgings at Well Walk, and found that he had grown
rapidly worse during his absence. In fact the case was desperate, and for
the next few months Keats's chief occupation was the harrowing one of
watching and ministering to this dying brother. In a letter written in the
third week of September, he speaks thus of his feelings and
occupations:--"I wish I could say Tom was better. His identity presses
upon me so all day that I am obliged to go out--and although I had
intended to have given some time to study alone, I am obliged to write and
plunge into abstract images to ease myself of his countenance, his voice,
and feebleness--so that I live now in a continual fever. It must be
poisonous to life, although I feel well. Imagine 'the hateful siege of
contraries'--if I think of fame, of poetry, it seems a crime to me, and
yet I must do so or suffer." And again about the same time to
Reynolds:--"I never was in love, yet the voice and shape of a woman has
haunted me these two days--at such a time when the relief, the feverous
relief of poetry, seems a much less crime. This morning poetry has
conquered--I have relapsed into those abstractions which are my only
life--I feel escaped from a new, strange, and threatening sorrow, and I am
thankful for it. There is an awful warmth about my heart, like a load of
immortality." As the autumn wore on, the task of the watcher grew ever
more sorrowful and absorbing[46]. On the 29th of October Keats wrote to
his brother and sister-in-law in America, warning them, in language of a
beautiful tender moderation and sincerity, to be prepared for the worst.
For the next month his time was almost wholly taken up by the sickbed, and
in the first week of December the end came. "Early one morning," writes
Brown, "I was awakened in my bed by a pressure on my hand. It was Keats,
who came to tell me that his brother was no more. I said nothing, and we
both remained silent for a while, my hand fast locked in his. At length,
my thoughts returning from the dead to the living, I said,--'Have nothing
more to do with those lodgings,--and alone too! Had you not better live
with me?' He paused, pressed my hand warmly, and replied,--'I think it
would be better.' From that moment he was my inmate[47]."

Brown, as has been said already, had built, and lived in, one part--the
smaller eastern part--of the block of two semi-detached houses near the
bottom of John Street, Hampstead, to which Dilke, who built and occupied
the other part, had given the name of Wentworth Place[48]. The
accommodation in Brown's quarters included a front and back sitting-room
on the ground floor, with a front and back bedroom over them. The
arrangement with Keats was that he should share household expenses,
occupying the front sitting-room for the sake of quiet at his work. As
soon, relates Brown, as the consolations of nature and friendship had in
some measure alleviated his grief, Keats became gradually once more
absorbed in poetry: his special task being _Hyperion_, at which he had
already begun to work before his brother died. But not wholly absorbed;
for there was beginning to wind itself about his heart a new spell more
powerful than that of poetry itself. It was at this time that the flame
caught him, which he had always presciently sought to avoid 'lest it
should burn him up.' With his quick self-knowledge he had early realised,
not to his satisfaction, his own peculiar mode of feeling towards
womankind. Chivalrously and tremulously devoted to his mind's ideal of the
sex, he found himself only too critical of the real women that he met, and
too ready to perceive or suspect faults in them. Conscious at the same
time of the fire of sense and blood within him, he had thought himself
partly fortunate in being saved from the entanglements of passion by his
sense of this difference between the reality and his ideal. The set of
three sonnets in his first volume, beginning 'Woman, when I beheld thee
flippant, vain,' had given expression half gracefully, half awkwardly, to
this state of mind. Its persistency is affirmed often in his letters.

    "I am certain," he wrote to Bailey from Scotland, "I have not a right
    feeling towards women--at this moment I am striving to be just to
    them, but I cannot. Is it because they fall so far beneath my boyish
    imagination? When I was a schoolboy I thought a fair woman a pure
    goddess; my mind was a soft nest in which some one of them slept,
    though she knew it not. I have no right to expect more than their
    reality. I thought them ethereal, above men. I find them perhaps
    equal--great by comparison is very small.... Is it not
    extraordinary?--when among men, I have no evil thoughts, no malice, no
    spleen; I feel free to speak or to be silent; I can listen, and from
    every one I can learn; my hands are in my pockets, I am free from all
    suspicion, and comfortable. When I am among women, I have evil
    thoughts, malice, spleen; I cannot speak, or be silent; I am full of
    suspicions, and therefore listen to nothing; I am in a hurry to be
    gone.... I must absolutely get over this--but how?"

In a fine passage of a letter to his relatives in America, he alleges this
general opinion of women, and with it his absorption in the life, or
rather the hundred lives, of imagination, as reasons for hoping that he
will never marry:--

    "The roaring of the wind is my wife; and the stars through my
    window-panes are my children; the mighty abstract idea of Beauty in
    all things, I have, stifles the more divided and minute domestic
    happiness. An amiable wife and sweet children I contemplate as part of
    that Beauty, but I must have a thousand of those beautiful particles
    to fill up my heart. I feel more and more every day, as my imagination
    strengthens, that I do not live in this world alone, but in a thousand
    worlds. No sooner am I alone, than shapes of epic greatness are
    stationed around me, and serve my spirit the office which is
    equivalent to a King's Bodyguard: "then Tragedy with scepter'd pall
    comes sweeping by." According to my state of mind, I am with Achilles
    shouting in the trenches, or with Theocritus in the vales of Sicily;
    or throw my whole being into Troilus, and, repeating those lines, "I
    wander like a lost soul upon the Stygian bank, staying for waftage," I
    melt into the air with a voluptuousness so delicate, that I am content
    to be alone. These things, combined with the opinion I have formed of
    the generality of women, who appear to me as children to whom I would
    rather give a sugar-plum than my time, form a barrier against
    matrimony that I rejoice in."

But now Keats's hour was come. Since his return from Scotland, in the
midst of his watching by his brother's sick-bed, we have seen him
confessing himself haunted already by the shape of a woman. This was a
certain Miss Charlotte Cox, a West-Indian cousin of Reynolds's, to whom he
did not think the Reynolds sisters were quite kind. A few days later he
writes again how he has been attracted by her rich Eastern look and grace.
Very soon, however, the attraction passed, and this 'Charmian' left him
fancy-free; but only to find his fate elsewhere. A Mrs Brawne, a widow
lady of some little property, with a daughter just grown up and two
younger children, had taken Brown's house for the summer while he was away
in Scotland. Here the Brawnes had naturally become acquainted with the
Dilkes, living next door: the acquaintance was kept up when they moved
from Brown's house to one in Downshire Street close by: and it was at the
Dilkes' that Keats met Miss Fanny Brawne after his return. Her ways and
presence at first irritated and after a little while completely fascinated
him. From his first sarcastic account of her written to his brother, as
well as from Severn's mention of her likeness to the draped figure in
Titian's picture of Sacred and Profane Love, and from the full-length
silhouette of her that has been preserved, it is not difficult to realise
her aspect and presence. A brisk and blooming, very young beauty, of the
far from uncommon English hawk blonde type, with aquiline nose and
retreating forehead, sharp-cut nostril and gray-blue eye, a slight,
shapely figure rather short than tall, a taking smile, and good hair,
carriage and complexion,--such was Fanny Brawne externally, but of her
character we have little means of judging. She was certainly
high-spirited, inexperienced, and self-confident: as certainly, though
kind and constant to her lover in spite of prospects that before long grew
dark, she did not fully realise what manner of man he was. Both his men
and women friends, without thinking unkindly of her, were apparently of
one opinion in holding her no mate for him either in heart or mind, and
in regarding the attachment as unlucky.

So it assuredly was: so probably under the circumstances must any passion
for a woman have been. Stroke on stroke of untoward fortune had in truth
begun to fall on Keats, as if in fulfilment of the constitutional
misgivings of his darker moods. First the departure of his brother George
had deprived him of his chief friend, to whom almost alone he had from
boyhood been accustomed to turn for relief in hours of despondency. Next
the exertions of his Scotch tour had over-taxed his strength, and
unchained, though as yet he knew it not, the deadly hereditary enemy in
his blood. Coming back, he had found the grasp of that enemy closed
inexorably upon his brother Tom, and in nursing him had lived in spirit
through all his pains. At the same time the gibes of the reviewers, little
as they might touch his inner self, came to teach him the harshness and
carelessness of the world's judgments, and the precariousness of his
practical hopes from literature. Last were added the pangs of love--love
requited indeed, but having no near or sure prospect of fruition: and even
love disdained might have made him suffer less. The passion wrought
fiercely in his already fevered blood; its alternations of doubt and
torment and tantalising rapture sapped his powers, and redoubled every
strain to which bereavement, shaken health, and anticipations of poverty,
exposed them. Within a year the combined assault proved too much for his
strength, and he broke down. But in the meantime he showed a brave face to
the world, and while anxiety gnawed and passion wasted him, was able to
throw himself into the labours of his art with a fruitful, if a fitful,
energy. During the first few weeks of winter following his brother's
death, he wrote indeed, as he tells Haydon, "only a little now and then:
but nothing to speak of--being discontented and as it were moulting." Yet
such work as Keats did at this time was done at the very height of his
powers, and included parts both of _Hyperion_ and _The Eve of St Agnes_.

Within a month of the date of the above extract the latter piece was
finished, having been written out during a visit which Keats and Brown
paid in Sussex in the latter part of January (1819). They stayed for a few
days with the father of their friend Dilke in Chichester, and for nearly a
fortnight with his sister and brother-in-law, the Snooks, at Bedhampton
close by. Keats liked his hosts and received pleasure from his visit; but
his health kept him much indoors, his only outings being to 'a couple of
dowager card-parties,' and to a gathering of country clergy on a wet day,
at the consecration of a chapel for converted Jews. The latter ceremony
jarred on his nerves, and caused him to write afterwards to his brother an
entertaining splenetic diatribe on the clerical character and physiognomy.
During his stay at Chichester he also seems to have begun, or at any rate
conceived, the poem on the _Eve of St Mark_, which he never finished, and
which remains so interesting a pre-Raphaelite fragment in his work.

Returning at the beginning of February, Keats resumed his life at
Hampstead under Brown's roof. He saw much less society than the winter
before, the state of his throat compelling him, for one thing, generally
to avoid the night air. But the chief cause of his seclusion was no doubt
the passion which was beginning to engross him, and to deaden his interest
in the other relations of life. The stages by which it grew on him we
cannot follow. His own account of the matter to Fanny Brawne was that he
had written himself her vassal within a week of their first meeting. His
real first feeling for her, as we can see by his letters written at the
time, had been one, the most perilous indeed to peace of mind, of strong
mixed attraction and aversion. He might seem to have got no farther by the
14th of February, when he writes to his brother and sister-in-law in
America, "Miss Brawne and I have every now and then a chat and a tiff;"
but this is rather to be taken as an instance of his extreme general
reticence on the subject, and it is probable that by this time, if not
sooner, the attachment was in fact avowed and the engagement made. The
secret violence of Keats's passion, and the restless physical jealousy
which accompanied it, betray themselves in the verses addressed _To
Fanny_, which belong apparently to this date. They are written very
unequally, but with his true and brilliant felicity of touch here and
there. The occasion is the presence of his mistress at some dance:--

  "Who now with greedy looks, eats up my feast,
    What stare outfaces now my silver moon?
  Ah! keep that hand unravished at the least;
        Let, let the amorous burn--
        But, pr'ythee, do not turn
    The current of your heart from me so soon,
        O! save, in charity,
        The quickest pulse for me.
  Save it for me, sweet love! though music breathe
    Voluptuous visions into the warm air,
  Though swimming through the dance's dangerous wreath;
        Be like an April day,
        Smiling and cold and gay,
    A temperate lily, temperate as fair;
        Then, Heaven! there will be
        A warmer June for me."

If Keats thus found in verse occasional relief from the violence of his
feelings, he sought for none in his correspondence either with his brother
or his friends. Except in the lightest passing allusion, he makes no
direct mention of Miss Brawne in his letters; partly, no doubt, from mere
excess of sensitiveness, dreading to profane his treasure; partly because
he knew, and could not bear the thought, that both his friends and hers,
in so far as they guessed the attachment, looked on it unfavourably. Brown
after a little while could hardly help being in the secret, inasmuch as
when the Dilkes left Hampstead in April, and went to live at Westminster,
the Brawnes again took their house; so that Keats and Brown thenceforth
had the young lady and her family for next-door neighbours. Dilke himself,
but apparently not till many months later, writes, "It is quite a settled
thing between John Keats and Miss Brawne, God help them. It's a bad thing
for them. The mother says she cannot prevent it, and her only hope is that
it will go off. He don't like any one to look at her or speak to her."
Other friends, including one so intimate and so affectionate as Severn,
never realised until Keats was on his death-bed that there had been an
engagement, or that his relations with Miss Brawne had been other than
those of ordinary intimacy between neighbours.

Intense and jealous as Keats's newly awakened passion was, it seemed at
first to stimulate rather than distract him in the exercise of his now
ripened poetic gift. The spring of this year 1819 seems to repeat in a
richer key the history of the last; fits of inspiration succeeding to fits
of lassitude, and growing more frequent as the season advanced. Between
the beginning of February and the beginning of June he wrote many of his
best shorter poems, including apparently all except one of his six famous
odes. About the middle of February he speaks of having taken a stroll
among the marbles of the British Museum, and the ode _On Indolence_ and
the ode _On a Grecian Urn_, written two or three months later, show how
the charm of ancient sculpture was at this time working in his mind. The
fit of morning idleness which helped to inspire the former piece is
recorded in his correspondence under the date of March 19. The lines
beginning 'Bards of passion and of mirth,' are dated the 26th of the same
month. On the 15th of April he sends off to his brother, as the last poem
he has written, the ode _To Psyche_, only less perfect and felicitous than
that _On a Grecian Urn_. About a week later the nightingale would be
beginning to sing. Presently it appeared that one had built her nest in
Brown's garden, near his house.

    "Keats," writes Brown, "felt a tranquil and continual joy in her song;
    and one morning he took his chair from the breakfast-table to the
    grass-plot under a plum, where he sat for two or three hours. When he
    came into the house, I perceived he had some scraps of paper in his
    hand, and these he was quietly thrusting behind the books. On inquiry,
    I found those scraps, four or five in number, contained his poetic
    feeling on the song of our nightingale. The writing was not well
    legible; and it was difficult to arrange the stanzas on so many
    scraps. With his assistance I succeeded, and this was his _Ode to a
    Nightingale_.... Immediately afterwards I searched for more of his (in
    reality) fugitive pieces, in which task, at my request, he again
    assisted me.... From that day he gave me permission to copy any verses
    he might write, and I fully availed myself of it. He cared so little
    for them himself, when once, as it appeared to me, his imagination was
    released from their influence, that he required a friend at hand to
    preserve them."

The above account perfectly agrees with what Keats had written towards
the end of the summer before:--"I feel assured I should write from the
mere yearning and fondness I have for the beautiful, even if my night's
labours should be burnt every morning, and no eye ever rest upon them."
And yet for these odes Keats seems to have had a partiality: with that to
Psyche, he tells his brother, he has taken more pains than with anything
he had ever written before; and Haydon has told how thrillingly, 'in his
low tremulous under-tone,' he recited to him that to the nightingale as
they walked one day in the Kilburn meadows.

During the winter and spring while his faculties were thus absorbed
between love and poetry, Keats had suffered his correspondence to flag,
except only with Haydon, with his young sister Fanny, and with his brother
and sister-in-law in America. About Christmas Haydon, whose work had been
interrupted by a weakness of the eyes, and whose borrowing powers were for
the time being exhausted, had turned in his difficulties to Keats of all
men. With his usual generosity Keats had promised, only asking him to try
the rich lovers of art first, that if the worst came to the worst he would
help him with all he had. Haydon in a few weeks returns to the
charge:--"My dear Keats--now I feel the want of your promised
assistance.... Before the 20th if you could help me it would be nectar and
manna and all the blessings of gratified thirst." Keats had intended for
Haydon's relief some of the money due to him from his brother Tom's share
in their grandmother's gift; which he expected his guardian to make over
to him at once on his application. But difficulties of all sorts were
raised, and after much correspondence, attendance in bankers' and
solicitors' offices, and other ordeals harassing to the poetic mind, he
had the annoyance of finding himself unable to do as he had hoped. When
by-and-by Haydon writes, in the true borrower's vein, reproaching him with
his promise and his failure to keep it, Keats replies with perfect temper,
explaining that he had supposed himself to have the necessary means in his
hand, but has been baffled by unforeseen difficulties in getting
possession of his money. Moreover he finds that even if all he had were
laid on the table, the intended loan would leave him barely enough to live
on for two years.[49] Incidentally he mentions that he has already lent
sums to various friends amounting in all to near £200, of which he expects
the repayment late if ever. The upshot of the matter was that Keats
contrived somehow to lend Haydon thirty pounds. Three months later a
law-suit threatened by the widow of Captain Jennings against Mr Abbey, in
connection with the administration of the trust, had the effect for a time
of stopping his supplies from that quarter altogether. Thereupon he very
gently asks Haydon to make an effort to repay his loan; who not only made
none--"he did not," says Keats, "seem to care much about it, but let me go
without my money almost with nonchalance." This was too much even for
Keats's patience. He declares that he shall never count Haydon a friend
again: nevertheless he by-and-by let old affection resume its sway, and
entered into the other's interests and endured his exhortations as kindly
as ever.

To his young sister Keats's letters during the same period are full of
playful brotherly tenderness and careful advice; of regrets that she is
kept so much from him by the scruples of Mr and Mrs Abbey; and of plans
for coming over to see her at Walthamstow when the weather and his throat
allow. He thinks of various little presents to please her,--a selection of
Tassie's pretty, and then popular, paste imitations of ancient
gems,--flowers,--drawing materials,--

    "anything but live stock. Though I will not now be very severe on it,
    remembering how fond I used to be of Goldfinches, Tomtits, Minnows,
    Mice, Ticklebacks, Dace, Cock Salmons and all the whole tribe of the
    Bushes and the Brooks: but verily they are better in the trees and the
    water,--though I must confess even now a partiality for a handsome
    globe of gold-fish--then I would have it hold ten pails of water and
    be fed continually fresh through a cool pipe with another pipe to let
    through the floor--well ventilated they would preserve all their
    beautiful silver and crimson. Then I would put it before a handsome
    painted window and shade it all round with Myrtles and Japonicas. I
    should like the window to open on to the Lake of Geneva--and there I'd
    sit and read all day like the picture of somebody reading."

For some time, in these letters to his sister, Keats expresses a constant
anxiety at getting no news from their brother George at the distant
Kentucky settlement whither he and his bride had at their last advices
been bound. In the middle of April news of them arrives, and he thereupon
sends off to them a long journal-letter which he has been writing up at
intervals during the last two months. Among all the letters of Keats, this
is perhaps the richest and most characteristic. It is full of the varied
matter of his thoughts, excepting always his thoughts of love: these are
only to be discerned in one trivial allusion, and more indistinctly in the
vaguely passionate tenor of two sonnets which he sends among other
specimens of his latest work in verse. One is that beginning 'Why did I
laugh to-night?'--the other that, beautiful and moving despite flaws of
execution, in which he describes a dream suggested by the Paolo and
Francesca passage in Dante. For the rest he passes disconnectedly as
usual--"it being an impossibility in grain," as Keats once wrote to
Reynolds, "for my ink to stain otherwise"--from the vein of fun and
freakishness to that of poetry and wisdom, with passages now of masterly
intuition, and now of wandering and uncertain, almost always beautiful,
speculative fancy, interspersed with expressions of the most generous
spirit of family affection, or the most searching and unaffected
disclosures of self-knowledge. Poetry and Beauty were the twin powers his
soul had ever worshipped; but his devotion to poetry seemed thus far to
promise him no reward either in fame or bread; while beauty had betrayed
her servant, and become to him a scorching instead of a sustaining power,
since his love for the beautiful in general had turned into a craving
passion for the beauty of a particular girl. As his flesh began to faint
in the service of these two, his soul turned often with a sense of
comfort, at times even almost of ecstasy, towards the milder divinity of
Death, whose image had never been unfamiliar to his thoughts:--

  "Verse, Fame, and Beauty are intense indeed,
  But Death intenser--Death is Life's high meed."

When he came down from these heights of feeling, and brought himself
soberly to face the facts of his existence, Keats felt himself compelled,
in those days while he was producing, 'out of the mere yearning and
fondness he had for the beautiful,' poem after poem that are among the
treasures of the English language, to consider whether as a practical
matter he could or ought to continue to apply himself to literature at
all. In spite of his magnanimous first reception of the _Blackwood_ and
_Quarterly_ gibes, we can see that as time went on he began more and more
to feel both his pride wounded and his prospects darkened by them.
Reynolds had hit the mark, as to the material harm which the reviews were
capable of inflicting, when he wrote the year before:--"Certain it is,
that hundreds of fashionable and flippant readers will henceforth set down
this young poet as a pitiable and nonsensical writer, merely on the
assertions of some single heartless critic, who has just energy enough to
despise what is good." Such in fact was exactly the reputation which
_Blackwood_ and the _Quarterly_ had succeeded in making for Keats, except
among a small private circle of admirers. Of praise and the thirst for
praise he continues to speak in as manly and sane a tone as ever;
especially in the two sonnets _On Fame_; and in the _Ode to Indolence_
declares--

  "For I would not be dieted with praise,
  A pet-lamb in a sentimental farce."

Again in the same ode, he speaks of his 'demon Poesy' as 'a maiden most
unmeek,' whom he loves the better the more blame is heaped on her. At the
same time he shows his sense of the practical position which the reviews
had made for him when he writes to his brother:--"These reviews are
getting more and more powerful, especially the 'Quarterly'.... I was in
hopes that as people saw, as they must do, all the trickery and iniquity
of these plagues, they would scout them; but no; they are like the
spectators at the Westminster cockpit, and do not care who wins or loses."
And as a consequence he adds presently, "I have been, at different times,
turning it in my head whether I should go to Edinburgh and study for a
physician. I am afraid I should not take kindly to it; I am sure I could
not take fees; and yet I should like to do so; it is not worse than
writing poems, and hanging them up to be fly-blown on the Review
shambles." A little later he mentions to his sister Fanny an idea he has
of taking a voyage or two as surgeon on board an East Indiaman. But Brown,
more than ever impressed during these last months with the power and
promise of his friend's genius, would not hear of this plan, and persuaded
him to abandon it and throw himself again upon literature. Keats being for
the moment unable to get at any of his money, Brown advanced him enough to
live on through the summer; and it was agreed that he should go and work
in the country, and that Brown should follow him.

Towards the end of July Keats accordingly left Hampstead, and went first
to join his friend Rice in lodgings at Shanklin. Rice's health was at this
time worse than ever; and Keats himself was far from well; his chest weak,
his nerves unstrung, his heart, as we can see by his letters to Fanny
Brawne, incessantly distracted between the pains and joys of love. These
love-letters of Keats are written with little or none of the bright ease
and play of mind which make his correspondence with his friends and family
so attractive. Pleasant passages, indeed, occur in them, but in the main
they are constrained and distressing, showing him a prey, despite his
efforts to master himself and be reasonable, to an almost abject intensity
and fretfulness of passion. An enraptured but an untrustful lover,
alternately rejoicing and chafing at his bondage, and passing through a
hundred conflicting extremes of feeling in an hour, he found in the fever
of work and composition his only antidote against the fever of his
love-sickness. As long as Rice and he were together at Shanklin, the two
ailing and anxious men, firm friends as they were, depressed and did each
other harm. It was better when Brown with his settled health and spirits
came to join them. Soon afterwards Rice left, and Brown and Keats then got
to work diligently at the task they had set before themselves, that of
writing a tragedy suitable for the stage. What other struggling man of
letters has not at one time or another shared the hope which animated
them, that this way lay the road to success and competence? Brown, whose
Russian opera had made a hit in its day, and brought him in £500, was
supposed to possess the requisite stage experience, and to him were
assigned the plot and construction of the play, while Keats undertook to
compose the dialogue. The subject was one taken from the history of the
Emperor Otho the Great. The two friends sat opposite each other at the
same table, and Keats wrote scene after scene as Brown sketched it out to
him, in each case without enquiring what was to come next, until the end
of the fourth act, when he took the conduct of the rest into his own
hands. Besides the joint work by means of which he thus hoped, at least in
sanguine hours, to find an escape from material difficulties, Keats was
busily engaged by himself in writing a new Greek tale in rhymed heroics,
_Lamia_. But a cloud of depression continued to hang over him. The climate
of Shanklin was against him: their lodgings were under the cliff, and from
the south-east, as he afterwards wrote, "came the damps of the sea, which
having no egress, the air would for days together take on an unhealthy
idiosyncrasy altogether enervating and weakening as a city smoke." After a
stay of five or six weeks, the friends made up their minds to change their
quarters, and went in the second week of August to Winchester. The old
cathedral city, with its peaceful closes breathing antiquity, its
clear-coursing streams and beautiful elm-shadowed meadow walks, and the
nimble and pure air of its surrounding downs, exactly suited Keats, who
quickly improved both in health and spirits. The days which he spent here,
from the middle of August to the middle of October, were the last good
days of his life. Working with a steady intensity of application, he
managed to steel himself for the time being against the importunity of his
passion, although never without a certain feverishness in the effort.

His work continued to be chiefly on _Lamia_, with the concluding part of
_Otho_, and the beginning of a new tragedy on the story of King Stephen;
in this last he laboured alone, without accepting help from Brown. Early
in September Brown left Winchester to go on a visit to Bedhampton.
Immediately afterwards a letter from America compelled Keats to go to town
and arrange with Mr Abbey for the despatch of fresh remittances to his
brother George. He dared not, to use his own words, 'venture into the
fire' by going to see his mistress at Hampstead, but stayed apparently
with Mr Taylor in Fleet Street, and was back on the fourth day at
Winchester, where he spent the following ten days or fortnight in
solitude. During this interval he took up _Hyperion_ again, but made up
his mind to go no farther with it, having got to feel its style and method
too Miltonic and artificial. _Lamia_ he had finished, and his chief
present occupation was in revising the _Eve of St Agnes_, studying Italian
in the pages of Ariosto, and writing up one of his long and full
journal-letters to brother and sister George. The season was fine, and the
beauty of the walks and the weather entering into his spirit, prompted
also in these days the last, and one certainly of the happiest, of his
odes, that _To Autumn_. To the fragment of _St Mark's Eve_, begun or
planned, as we have seen, the January before, he now added lines inspired
at once by the spirit of city quietude, which his letters show to have
affected him deeply here at Winchester, and by the literary example of
Chatterton, for whom his old admiration had of late returned in full
force.

The wholesome brightness of the early autumn continuing to sustain and
soothe him, Keats made in these days a vigorous effort to rally his moral
powers, to banish over-passionate and morbid feelings, and to put himself
on a right footing with the world. The letter to America already
mentioned, and others written at the same time to Reynolds, Taylor, Dilke,
Brown, and Haydon, are full of evidences of this spirit. The ill success
of his brother in his American speculations shall serve, he is determined,
as a spur to his own exertions, and now that real troubles are upon them,
he will show that he can bear them better than those of imagination. The
imaginary nail a man down for a sufferer, as on a cross; the real spur him
up into an agent. He has been passing his time between reading, writing,
and fretting; the last he now intends to give up, and stick to the other
two. He does not consider he has any just cause of complaint against the
world; he has done nothing as yet except for the amusement of a few people
predisposed for sentiment, and is convinced that any thing really fine
will make its way. "What reviewers can put a hindrance to must be a
nothing--or mediocre which is worse." With reference to his own plans for
the future, he is determined to trust no longer to mere hopes of ultimate
success, whether from plays or poems, but to turn to the natural resource
of a man 'fit for nothing but literature' and needing to support himself
by his pen: the resource, that is, of journalism and reviewing. "I will
write, on the liberal side of the question, for whoever will pay me. I
have not known yet what it is to be diligent. I purpose living in town in
a cheap lodging, and endeavouring for a beginning, to get the theatricals
of some paper. When I can afford to compose deliberate poems, I will."
These words are from a letter written to Brown on the 22nd of September,
and further on in the same letter we find evidence of the honourable
spirit of independence and unselfishness towards his friends which went
together in Keats, as it too rarely does, with an affectionate willingness
to accept their services at a pinch. He had been living since May on a
loan from Brown and an advance from Taylor, and was uneasy at putting the
former to a sacrifice. The subject, he says, is often in his mind,--

    "and the end of my speculations is always an anxiety for your
    happiness. This anxiety will not be one of the least incitements to
    the plan I propose pursuing. I had got into a habit of mind of looking
    towards you as a help in all difficulties. You will see it is a duty I
    owe myself to break the neck of it. I do nothing for my
    subsistence--make no exertion. At the end of another year you shall
    applaud me, not for verses, but for conduct."

Brown, returning to Winchester a few days later, found his friend unshaken
in the same healthy resolutions, and however loth to lose his company, and
doubtful of his power to live the life he proposed, respected their
motives too much to contend against them. It was accordingly settled that
the two friends should part, Brown returning to his own house at
Hampstead, while Keats went to live by himself in London and look out for
employment on the press.




CHAPTER VII.

    _Isabella_--_Hyperion_--_The Eve of St Agnes_--_The Eve of St
    Mark_--_La Belle Dame Sans Merci_--_Lamia_--The Odes--The Plays.


During the twenty months ending with his return from Winchester as last
narrated, Keats had been able, even while health and peace of mind and
heart deserted him, to produce in quick succession the series of poems
which give us the true measure of his powers. In the sketches and epistles
of his first volume we have seen him beginning, timidly and with no
clearness of aim, to make trial of his poetical resources. A year
afterwards he had leapt, to use his own words, headlong into the sea, and
boldly tried his strength on the composition of a long mythological
romance--half romance, half parable of that passion for universal beauty
of which he felt in his own bosom the restless and compulsive workings. In
the execution, he had done injustice to the power of poetry that was in
him by letting both the exuberance of fancy and invention, and the caprice
of rhyme, run away with him, and by substituting for the worn-out verbal
currency of the last century a semi-Elizabethan coinage of his own, less
acceptable by habit to the literary sense, and often of not a whit greater
real poetic value. The experiment was rash, but when he next wrote, it
became manifest that it had not been made in vain. After _Endymion_ his
work threw off, not indeed entirely its faults, but all its weakness and
ineffectiveness, and shone for the first time with a full 'effluence' (the
phrase is Landor's) 'of power and light[50].'

His next poem of importance was _Isabella_, planned and begun, as we saw,
in February 1818, and finished in the course of the next two months at
Teignmouth. The subject is taken from the well-known chapter of Boccaccio
which tells of the love borne by a damsel of Messina for a youth in the
employ of her merchant-brothers, with its tragic close and pathetic
sequel[51]. Keats for some reason transfers the scene of the story from
Messina to Florence. Nothing can be less sentimental than Boccaccio's
temper, nothing more direct and free from superfluity than his style.
Keats invoking him asks pardon for his own work as what it truly is,--'An
echo of thee in the North-wind sung.' Not only does the English poet set
the southern story in a framework of northern landscape, telling us of the
Arno, for instance, how its stream--

  "Gurgles through straitened banks, and still doth fan
    Itself with dancing bulrush, and the bream
  Keeps head against the freshets"--

he further adorns and amplifies it in a northern manner, enriching it with
tones of sentiment and colours of romance, and brooding over every image
of beauty or passion as he calls it up. These things he does--but no
longer inordinately as heretofore. His powers of imagination and of
expression have alike gained strength and discipline; and through the
shining veils of his poetry his creations make themselves seen and felt in
living shape, action, and motive. False touches and misplaced beauties are
indeed not wanting. For example, in the phrase

      "his erewhile timid lips grew bold
  And poesied with hers in dewy rhyme,"

we have an effusively false touch, in the sugared taste not infrequent in
his earliest verses. And in the call of the wicked brothers to Lorenzo--

  "To-day we purpose, aye this hour we mount
    To spur three leagues towards the Apennine.
  Come down, we pray thee, ere the hot sun count
    His dewy rosary on the eglantine,"--

the last two lines are a beauty indeed, and of the kind most
characteristic of the poet, yet a beauty (as Leigh Hunt long ago pointed
out) misplaced in the mouths that utter it. Moreover the language of
_Isabella_ is still occasionally slipshod, and there are turns and
passages where we feel, as we felt so often in _Endymion_, that the poetic
will has abdicated to obey the chance dictation or suggestion of the
rhyme. But these are the minor blemishes of a poem otherwise conspicuous
for power and charm.

For his Italian story Keats chose an Italian metre, the octave stanza
introduced in English by Wyatt and Sidney, and naturalised before long by
Daniel, Drayton, and Edward Fairfax. Since their day, the stanza had been
little used in serious poetry, though Frere and Byron had lately revived
it for the poetry of light narrative and satire, the purpose for which the
epigrammatic snap and suddenness of the closing couplet in truth best fit
it. Keats, however, contrived generally to avoid this effect, and handles
the measure flowingly and well in a manner suited to his tale of pathos.
Over the purely musical and emotional resources of his art he shows a
singular command in stanzas like that beginning, 'O Melancholy, linger
here awhile,' repeated with variations as a kind of melodious interlude of
the main narrative. And there is a brilliant alertness of imagination in
such episodical passages as that where he pauses to realize the varieties
of human toil contributing to the wealth of the merchant brothers. But the
true test of a poem like this is that it should combine, at the essential
points and central moments of action and passion, imaginative vitality and
truth with beauty and charm. This test _Isabella_ admirably bears. For
instance, in the account of the vision which appears to the heroine of her
lover's mouldering corpse:--

  "Its eyes, though wild, were still all dewy-bright
    With love, and kept all phantom fear aloof
  From the poor girl by magic of their light."

With what a true poignancy of human tenderness is the story of the
apparition invested by this touch, and all its charnel horror and grimness
mitigated! Or again in the stanzas describing Isabella's actions at her
lover's burial place:--

  "She gazed into the fresh thrown mould, as though
    One glance did fully all its secrets tell;
  Clearly she saw, as other eyes would know
    Pale limbs at bottom of a crystal well;
  Upon the murderous spot she seem'd to grow,
    Like to a native lily of the dell:
  Then with her knife, all sudden, she began
  To dig more fervently than misers can.

  Soon she turn'd up a soiled glove, whereon
    Her silk had play'd in purple phantasies;
  She kiss'd it with a lip more chill than stone,
    And put it in her bosom, where it dries
  And freezes utterly unto the bone
    Those dainties made to still an infant's cries:
  Then 'gan she work again; nor stay'd her care,
  But to throw back at times her veiling hair."

The lines are not all of equal workmanship: but the scene is realised with
unerring vision. The swift despairing gaze of the girl, anticipating with
too dire a certainty the realization of her dream: the simile in the third
and fourth lines, emphasizing the clearness of that certainty, and at the
same time relieving its terror by an image of beauty: the new simile of
the lily, again striking the note of beauty, while it intensifies the
impression of her rooted fixity of posture and purpose: the sudden
solution of that fixity, with the final couplet, into vehement action, as
she begins to dig 'more fervently than misers can' (what a commentary on
the relative strength of passions might be drawn from this simple
text):--then the first reward of her toil, in the shape of a relic not
ghastly, but beautiful both in itself and for the tenderness of which it
is a token: her womanly action in kissing it and putting it in her bosom,
while all the woman and mother in her is in the same words revealed to us
as blighted by the tragedy of her life: then the resumption and
continuance of her labours, with gestures once more of vital dramatic
truth as well as grace:--to imagine and to write like this is the
privilege of the best poets only, and even the best have not often
combined such concentrated force and beauty of conception with such a
limpid and flowing ease of narrative. Poetry had always come to Keats, as
he considered it ought to come, as naturally as leaves to a tree; and now
that it came of a quality like this, he had fairly earned the right, which
his rash youth had too soon arrogated, to look down on the fine artificers
of the school of Pope. In comparison with the illuminating power of true
imaginative poetry, the closest rhetorical condensations of that school
seem loose and thin, their most glittering points and aphorisms dull: nay,
those who admire them most justly will know better than to think the two
kinds of writing comparable.

After the completion of _Isabella_ followed the Scotch tour, of which the
only poetic fruits of value were the lines on Meg Merrilies and those on
Fingal's Cave. Returning in shaken health to the bedside of a brother
mortally ill, Keats plunged at once into the most arduous poetic labour he
had yet undertaken. This was the composition of _Hyperion_[52]. The
subject had been long in his mind, and both in the text and the preface of
_Endymion_ he indicated his intention to attempt it. At first he thought
of the poem to be written as a 'romance': but under the influence of
_Paradise Lost_, and no doubt also considering the height and vastness of
the subject, his plan changed to that of a blank verse epic in ten books.
His purpose was to sing the Titanomachia, or warfare of the earlier
Titanic dynasty with the later Olympian dynasty of the Greek gods; and in
particular one episode of that warfare, the dethronement of the sun-god
Hyperion and the assumption of his kingdom by Apollo. Critics, even
intelligent critics, sometimes complain that Keats should have taken this
and other subjects of his art from what they call the 'dead' mythology of
ancient Greece. As if that mythology could ever die: as if the ancient
fables, in passing out of the transitory state of things believed, into
the state of things remembered and cherished in imagination, had not put
on a second life more enduring and more fruitful than the first. Faiths,
as faiths, perish one after another: but each in passing away bequeaths
for the enrichment of the after-world whatever elements it has contained
of imaginative or moral truth or beauty. The polytheism of ancient Greece,
embodying the instinctive effort of the brightliest-gifted human race to
explain its earliest experiences of nature and civilization, of the
thousand moral and material forces, cruel or kindly, which environ and
control the life of man on earth, is rich beyond measure in such elements;
and if the modern world at any time fails to value them, it is the modern
mind which is in so far dead and not they. One of the great symptoms of
returning vitality in the imagination of Europe, toward the close of the
last century, was its awakening to the forgotten charm of past modes of
faith and life. When men, in the earlier part of that century, spoke of
Greek antiquity, it was in stale and borrowed terms which showed that they
had never felt its power; just as, when they spoke of nature, it was in
set phrases that showed that they had never looked at her. On matters of
daily social experience the gifts of observation and of reason were
brilliantly exercised, but all the best thoughts of the time were thoughts
of the street, the mart, and the assembly. The human genius was for the
time being like some pilgrim long detained within city walls, and unused
to see or think of anything beyond them. At length resuming its march, it
emerged on open ground, where it fell to enjoying with a forgotten zest
the beauties of the earth and sky, and whence at the same time it could
turn back to gaze on regions it had long left behind, discerning with new
clearness and a new emotion, here under cloud and rainbow the forests and
spired cities of the Middle Age, there in serener light the hills and
havens and level fanes of Hellas.

The great leader and pioneer of the modern spirit on this new phase of its
pilgrimage was Goethe, who with deliberate effort and self-discipline
climbed to heights commanding an equal survey over the mediæval and the
classic past. We had in England had an earlier, shyer, and far less
effectual pioneer in Gray. As time went on, poet after poet arose and sang
more freely, one the glories of nature, another the enchantments of the
Middle Age, another the Greek beauty and joy of life. Keats when his time
came showed himself, all young and untutored as he was, freshly and
powerfully inspired to sing of all three alike. He does not, as we have
said, write of Greek things in a Greek manner. Something indeed in
_Hyperion_--at least in the first two books--he has caught from _Paradise
Lost_ of the high restraint and calm which was common to the Greeks and
Milton. But to realise how far he is in workmanship from the Greek purity
and precision of outline, and firm definition of individual images, we
have only to think of his palace of Hyperion, with its vague far-dazzling
pomps and phantom terrors of coming doom. This is the most sustained and
celebrated passage of the poem. Or let us examine one of its most
characteristic images from nature:--

  "As when, upon a tranced summer night,
  Those green-robed senators of mighty woods,
  Tall oaks, branch-charmed by the earnest stars,
  Dream, and so dream all night without a stir--."

Not to the simplicity of the Greek, but to the complexity of the modern,
sentiment of nature, it belongs to try and express, by such a concourse of
metaphors and epithets, every effect at once, to the most fugitive, which
a forest scene by starlight can have upon the mind: the pre-eminence of
the oaks among the other trees--their aspect of human venerableness--their
verdure, unseen in the darkness--the sense of their preternatural
stillness and suspended life in an atmosphere that seems to vibrate with
mysterious influences communicated between earth and sky[53].

But though Keats sees the Greek world from afar, he sees it truly. The
Greek touch is not his, but in his own rich and decorated English way he
writes with a sure insight into the vital meaning of Greek ideas. For the
story of the war of Titans and Olympians he had nothing to guide him
except scraps from the ancient writers, principally Hesiod, as retailed by
the compilers of classical dictionaries; and from the scholar's point of
view his version, we can see, would at many points have been arbitrary,
mixing up Latin conceptions and nomenclature with Greek, and introducing
much new matter of his own invention. But as to the essential meaning of
that warfare and its result--the dethronement of an older and ruder
worship by one more advanced and humane, in which ideas of ethics and of
arts held a larger place beside ideas of nature and her brute powers,--as
to this, it could not possibly be divined more truly, or illustrated with
more beauty and force, than by Keats in the speech of Oceanus in the
Second Book. Again, in conceiving and animating these colossal shapes of
early gods, with their personalities between the elemental and the human,
what masterly justice of instinct does he show,--to take one point
only--in the choice of similitudes, drawn from the vast inarticulate
sounds of nature, by which he seeks to make us realize their voices. Thus
of the assembled gods when Saturn is about to speak:--

  "There is a roaring in the bleak-grown pines
  When Winter lifts his voice; there is a noise
  Among immortals when a God gives sign,
  With hushing finger, how he means to load
  His tongue with the full weight of utterless thought,
  With thunder, and with music, and with pomp:
  Such noise is like the roar of bleak-grown pines."

Again, of Oceanus answering his fallen chief:--

  "So ended Saturn; and the God of the Sea,
  Sophist and sage, from no Athenian grove,
  But cogitation in his watery shades,
  Arose, with locks not oozy, and began,
  In murmurs, which his first-endeavouring tongue
  Caught infant-like from the far-foamed sands."

And once more, of Clymene followed by Enceladus in debate:--

  "So far her voice flow'd on, like timorous brook
  That, lingering along a pebbled coast,
  Doth fear to meet the sea: but sea it met,
  And shudder'd; for the overwhelming voice
  Of huge Enceladus swallow'd it in wrath:
  The ponderous syllables, like sullen waves
  In the half-glutted hollows of reef-rocks,
  Came booming thus."

This second book of _Hyperion_, relating the council of the dethroned
Titans, has neither the sublimity of the first, where the solemn opening
vision of Saturn fallen is followed by the resplendent one of Hyperion
threatened in his 'lucent empire'; nor the intensity of the unfinished
third, where we leave Apollo undergoing a convulsive change under the
afflatus of Mnemosyne, and about to put on the full powers of his godhead.
But it has a rightness and controlled power of its own which place it, to
my mind, quite on a level with the other two.

With a few slips and inequalities, and one or two instances of verbal
incorrectness, _Hyperion_, as far as it was written, is indeed one of the
grandest poems in our language, and in its grandeur seems one of the
easiest and most spontaneous. Keats, however, had never been able to apply
himself to it continuously, but only by fits and starts. Partly this was
due to the distractions of bereavement, of material anxiety, and of
dawning passion amid which it was begun and continued: partly (if we may
trust the statement of the publishers) to disappointment at the reception
of _Endymion_: and partly, it is clear, to something not wholly congenial
to his powers in the task itself. When after letting the poem lie by
through the greater part of the spring and summer of 1819, he in September
made up his mind to give it up, he wrote to Reynolds explaining his
reasons as follows. "There were too many Miltonic inversions in
it--Miltonic verse cannot be written but in an artful, or rather, artist's
humour. I wish to give myself up to other sensations. English ought to be
kept up." In the same connection he declares that Chatterton is the purest
writer in the English language. "He has no French idiom or particles, like
Chaucer; it is genuine English idiom in English words." In writing about
the same time to his brother, he again expresses similar opinions both as
to Milton and Chatterton.

The influence, and something of the majesty, of _Paradise Lost_ are in
truth to be found in _Hyperion_: and the debate of the fallen Titans in
the second book is obviously to some extent modelled on the debate of the
fallen angels. But Miltonic the poem hardly is in any stricter sense.
Passing by those general differences that arise from the contrast of
Milton's age with Keats's youth, of his austerity with Keats's luxuriance
of spirit, and speaking of palpable and technical differences only:--in
the matter of rhythm, Keats's blank verse has not the flight of Milton's.
Its periods do not wheel through such stately evolutions to so solemn and
far-foreseen a close; though it indeed lacks neither power nor music, and
ranks unquestionably with the finest blank-verse written since
Milton,--beside that of Shelley's _Alastor_,--perhaps a little below that
of Wordsworth when Wordsworth is at his infrequent best. As to diction and
the poetic use of words, Keats shows almost as masterly an instinct as
Milton himself: but while of Milton's diction the characteristic colour is
derived from reading and meditation, from an impassioned conversance with
the contents of books, the characteristic colour of Keats's diction is
rather derived from conversance with nature and with the extreme
refinements of physical sensation. He is no match for Milton in a passage
of this kind:--

            "Eden stretch'd her line
  From Auran eastward to the royal towers
  Of great Seleucia, built by Grecian kings,
  Or where the sons of Eden long before
  Dwelt in Telassar."

But then neither is Milton a match for Keats in work like this:--

            "throughout all the isle
  There was no covert, no retired cave
  Unhaunted by the murmurous noise of waves,
  Though scarcely heard in many a green recess."

After the pomp and glow of learned allusion, the second chief technical
note of Milton's style is his partiality for a Latin use of the relative
pronoun and the double negative, and for scholarly Latin turns and
constructions generally. Already in _Isabella_ Keats is to be found
attempting both notes, thus:--

  "With duller steel than the Persean sword
  They cut away no formless monster's head--."

Similar Miltonic echoes occur in _Hyperion_, as in the introduction
already quoted to the speech of Oceanus: or again thus:--

  "Then, as was wont, his palace-door flew ope
  In smoothest silence, save what solemn tubes,
  Blown by the serious Zephyrs, gave of sweet
  And wandering sounds, slow-breathed melodies."

But they are not frequent, nor had Keats adopted as much of Milton's
technical manner as he seems to have supposed. Yet he had adopted more of
it than was natural to him or than he cared to maintain.

In turning away from Milton to Chatterton, he was going back to one of his
first loves in literature. What he says of Chatterton's words and idioms
seems paradoxical enough, as applied to the archaic jargon concocted by
the Bristol boy out of Kersey's _Dictionary_[54]. But it is true that
through that jargon can be discerned, in the Rowley poems, not only an
ardent feeling for romance and an extraordinary facility in composition,
but a remarkable gift of plain and flowing construction. And after Keats
had for some time moved, not perfectly at his ease, though with results to
us so masterly, in the paths of Milton, we find him in fact tempted aside
on an excursion into the regions beloved by Chatterton. We know not how
much of _Hyperion_ had been written when he laid it aside in January to
take up the composition of _St Agnes' Eve_, that unsurpassed example--nay,
must we not rather call it unequalled?--of the pure charm of coloured and
romantic narrative in English verse. As this poem does not attempt the
elemental grandeur of _Hyperion_, so neither does it approach the human
pathos and passion of _Isabella_. Its personages appeal to us, not so much
humanly and in themselves, as by the circumstances, scenery and atmosphere
amidst which we see them move. Herein lies the strength, and also the
weakness, of modern romance,--its strength, inasmuch as the charm of the
mediæval colour and mystery is unfailing for those who feel it at
all,--its weakness, inasmuch as under the influence of that charm both
writer and reader are too apt to forget the need for human and moral
truth: and without these no great literature can exist.

Keats takes in this poem the simple, almost threadbare theme of the love
of an adventurous youth for the daughter of a hostile house,--a story
wherein something of Romeo and Juliet is mixed with something of young
Lochinvar,--and brings it deftly into association with the old popular
belief as to the way a maiden might on this anniversary win sight of her
lover in a dream. Choosing happily, for such a purpose, the Spenserian
stanza, he adds to the melodious grace, the 'sweet-slipping movement,' as
it has been called, of Spenser, a transparent ease and directness of
construction; and with this ease and directness combines (wherein lies the
great secret of his ripened art) a never-failing richness and
concentration of poetic meaning and suggestion. From the opening stanza,
which makes us feel the chill of the season to our bones,--telling us
first of its effect on the wild and tame creatures of wood and field, and
next how the frozen breath of the old beadsman in the chapel aisle 'seem'd
taking flight for heaven, without a death,'--from thence to the close,
where the lovers make their way past the sleeping porter and the friendly
bloodhound into the night, the poetry seems to throb in every line with
the life of imagination and beauty. It indeed plays in great part about
the external circumstances and decorative adjuncts of the tale. But in
handling these Keats's method is the reverse of that by which some writers
vainly endeavour to rival in literature the effects of the painter and
sculptor. He never writes for the eye merely, but vivifies everything he
touches, telling even of dead and senseless things in terms of life,
movement, and feeling. Thus the monuments in the chapel aisle are brought
before us, not by any effort of description, but solely through our
sympathy with the shivering fancy of the beadsman:--

    "Knights, ladies, praying in dumb orat'ries,
     He passeth by; and his weak spirit fails
  To think how they may ache in icy hoods and mails."

Even into the sculptured heads of the corbels in the banqueting hall the
poet strikes life:--

  "The carved angels, ever eager-eyed,
    Stared, where upon their heads the cornice rests,
  With wings blown back, and hands put cross-wise on their breasts."

The painted panes in the chamber window, instead of trying to pick out
their beauties in detail, he calls--

  "Innumerable of stains and splendid dyes
  As are the tiger-moth's deep-damask'd wings,--"

a gorgeous phrase which leaves the widest range to the colour-imagination
of the reader, giving it at the same time a sufficient clue by the simile
drawn from a particular specimen of nature's blazonry. In the last line of
the same stanza--

  "A shielded scutcheon blush'd with blood of queens and kings,"

--the word 'blush' makes the colour seem to come and go, while the mind is
at the same time sent travelling from the maiden's chamber on thoughts of
her lineage and ancestral fame. Observation, I believe, shows that
moonlight has not the power to transmit the hues of painted glass as Keats
in this celebrated passage represents it. Let us be grateful for the
error, if error it is, which has led him to heighten, by these saintly
splendours of colour, the sentiment of a scene wherein a voluptuous glow
is so exquisitely attempered with chivalrous chastity and awe. When
Madeline unclasps her jewels, a weaker poet would have dwelt on their
lustre or other visible qualities: Keats puts those aside, and speaks
straight to our spirits in an epithet breathing with the very life of the
wearer,--'her warmed jewels.' When Porphyro spreads the feast of dainties
beside his sleeping mistress, we are made to feel how those ideal and rare
sweets of sense surround and minister to her, not only with their own
natural richness, but with the associations and the homage of all far
countries whence they have been gathered--

  "From silken Samarcand to cedar'd Lebanon."

If the unique charm of the _Eve of St Agnes_ lies thus in the richness and
vitality of the accessory and decorative images, the actions and emotions
of the personages are hardly less happily conceived as far as they go.
What can be better touched than the figures of the beadsman and the nurse,
who live just long enough to share in the wonders of the night, and die
quietly of age when their parts are over[55]: especially the debate of old
Angela with Porphyro, and her gentle treatment by her mistress on the
stair? Madeline is exquisite throughout, but most of all, I think, at two
moments: first when she has just entered her chamber,--

  "No uttered syllable, or, woe betide:
  But to her heart, her heart was voluble,
  Paining with eloquence her balmy side:"--

and afterwards when, awakening, she finds her lover beside her, and
contrasts his bodily presence with her dream:--

  "'Ah Porphyro!' said she, 'but even now
  Thy voice was at sweet tremble in mine ear
  Made tunable with every sweetest vow;
  And those sad eyes were spiritual and clear;
  How changed thou art! how pallid, chill, and drear'."

Criticism may urge, indeed, that in the 'growing faint' of Porphyro, and
in his 'warm unnerved arm,' we have a touch of that swooning abandonment
to which Keats's heroes are too subject. But it is the slightest
possible; and after all the trait belongs not more to the poet
individually than to his time. Lovers in prose romances of that date are
constantly overcome in like manner. And we may well pardon Porphyro his
weakness, in consideration of the spirit which has led him to his lady's
side in defiance of her 'whole bloodthirsty race,' and will bear her
safely, this night of happy marvels over, to the home 'beyond the southern
moors' that he has prepared for her[56].

Nearly allied with the _Eve of St Agnes_ is the fragment in the four-foot
ballad metre, which Keats composed on the parallel popular belief
connected with the eve of St Mark. This piece was planned, as we saw, at
Chichester, and written, it appears, partly there and partly at Winchester
six months later: the name of the heroine, Bertha, seems farther to
suggest associations with Canterbury. Impressions of all these three
cathedral cities which Keats knew are combined, no doubt, in the picture
of which the fragment consists. I have said picture, but there are two:
one the out-door picture of the city streets in their spring freshness and
Sabbath peace: the other the indoor picture of the maiden reading in her
quaint fire-lit chamber. Each in its way is of an admirable vividness and
charm. The belief about St Mark's Eve was that a person stationed near a
church porch at twilight on that anniversary would see entering the church
the apparitions of those about to die, or be brought near death, in the
ensuing year. Keats's fragment breaks off before the story is well
engaged, and it is not easy to see how his opening would have led up to
incidents illustrating this belief. Neither is it clear whether he
intended to place them in mediæval or in relatively modern times. The
demure Protestant air which he gives the Sunday streets, the Oriental
furniture and curiosities of the lady's chamber, might seem to indicate
the latter: but we must remember that he was never strict in his
archæology--witness, for instance, the line which tells how 'the long
carpets rose along the gusty floor' in the _Eve of St Agnes_. The interest
of the _St Mark's_ fragment, then, lies not in moving narrative or the
promise of it, but in two things: first, its pictorial brilliance and
charm of workmanship: and second, its relation to and influence on later
English poetry. Keats in this piece anticipates in a remarkable degree the
feeling and method of the modern pre-Raphaelite schools. The indoor scene
of the girl over her book, in its insistent delight in vivid colour and
the minuteness of far-sought suggestive and picturesque detail, is
perfectly in the spirit of Rossetti (whom we know that the fragment deeply
impressed and interested),--of his pictures even more than of his poems:
while in the out-door work we seem to find forestalled the very tones and
cadences of Mr Morris in some tale of the _Earthly Paradise_:--

  "The city streets were clean and fair
  From wholesome drench of April rains;
  And on the western window panes
  The chilly sunset faintly told
  Of unmatured green valleys cold,
  Of the green thorny bloomless hedge,
  Of rivers new with springtide sedge."

Another poem of the same period, romantic in a different sense, is _La
Belle Dame sans Merci_. The title is taken from that of a poem by Alain
Chartier,--the secretary and court poet of Charles VI. and Charles VII.
of France,--of which an English translation used to be attributed to
Chaucer, and is included in the early editions of his works. This title
had caught Keats's fancy, and in the _Eve of St Agnes_ he makes Lorenzo
waken Madeline by playing beside her bed--

              "an ancient ditty, long since mute,
  In Provence call'd 'La belle dame sans merci'."

The syllables continuing to haunt him, he wrote in the course of the
spring or summer (1819) a poem of his own on the theme, which has no more
to do with that of Chartier than Chartier has really to do with
Provence[57]. Keats's ballad can hardly be said to tell a story; but
rather sets before us, with imagery drawn from the mediæval world of
enchantment and knight-errantry, a type of the wasting power of love, when
either adverse fate or deluded choice makes of love not a blessing but a
bane. The plight which the poet thus shadows forth is partly that of his
own soul in thraldom. Every reader must feel how truly the imagery
expresses the passion: how powerfully, through these fascinating old-world
symbols, the universal heart of man is made to speak. To many students (of
whom the present writer is one) the union of infinite tenderness with a
weird intensity, the conciseness and purity of the poetic form, the wild
yet simple magic of the cadences, the perfect 'inevitable' union of sound
and sense, make of _La Belle Dame sans Merci_ the master-piece, not only
among the shorter poems of Keats, but even (if any single master-piece
must be chosen) among them all.

Before finally giving up _Hyperion_ Keats had conceived and written,
during his summer months at Shanklin and Winchester, another narrative
poem on a Greek subject: but one of those where Greek life and legend come
nearest to the mediæval, and give scope both for scenes of wonder and
witchcraft, and for the stress and vehemence of passion. I speak, of
course, of _Lamia_, the story of the serpent-lady, both enchantress and
victim of enchantments, who loves a youth of Corinth, and builds for him
by her art a palace of delights, until their happiness is shattered by the
scrutiny of intrusive and cold-blooded wisdom. Keats had found the germ of
the story, quoted from Philostratus, in Burton's _Anatomy of Melancholy_.
In versifying it he went back once more to rhymed heroics; handling them,
however, not as in _Endymion_, but in a manner founded on that of Dryden,
with a free use of the Alexandrine, a more sparing one of the overflow and
the irregular pause, and of disyllabic rhymes none at all. In the measure
as thus treated by Keats there is a fire and grace of movement, a lithe
and serpentine energy, well suited to the theme, and as effective in its
way as the victorious march of Dryden himself. Here is an example where
the poetry of Greek mythology is finely woven into the rhetoric of love:--

  "Leave thee alone! Look back! Ah, goddess, see
  Whether my eyes can ever turn from thee!
  For pity do not this sad heart belie--
  Even as thou vanishest so I shall die.
  Stay! though a Naiad of the rivers, stay!
  To thy far wishes will thy streams obey:
  Stay! though the greenest woods be thy domain,
  Alone they can drink up the morning rain:
  Though a descended Pleiad, will not one
  Of thine harmonious sisters keep in tune
  Thy spheres, and as thy silver proxy shine?"

And here an instance of the power and reality of scenic imagination:--

  "As men talk in a dream, so Corinth all,
  Throughout her palaces imperial,
  And all her populous streets and temples lewd,
  Mutter'd, like tempest in the distance brew'd,
  To the wide-spreaded night above her towers.
  Men, women, rich and poor, in the cool hours,
  Shuffled their sandals o'er the pavement white,
  Companion'd or alone; while many a light
  Flar'd, here and there, from wealthy festivals,
  And threw their moving shadows on the walls,
  Or found them cluster'd in the cornic'd shade
  Of some arch'd temple door, or dusty colonnade."

No one can deny the truth of Keats's own criticism on _Lamia_ when he
says, "I am certain there is that sort of fire in it which must take hold
of people in some way--give them either pleasant or unpleasant sensation."
There is perhaps nothing in all his writing so vivid, or that so burns
itself in upon the mind, as the picture of the serpent-woman awaiting the
touch of Hermes to transform her, followed by the agonized process of the
transformation itself. Admirably told, though perhaps somewhat
disproportionately for its place in the poem, is the introductory episode
of Hermes and his nymph: admirably again the concluding scene where the
merciless gaze of the philosopher exorcises his pupil's dream of love and
beauty, and the lover in forfeiting his illusion forfeits life. This
thrilling vividness of narration in particular points, and the fine
melodious vigour of much of the verse, have caused some students to give
_Lamia_ almost the first, if not the first, place among Keats's narrative
poems. But surely for this it is in some parts too feverish, and in others
too unequal. It contains descriptions not entirely successful, as for
instance that of the palace reared by Lamia's magic; which will not bear
comparison with other and earlier dream-palaces of the poet's building.
And it has reflective passages, as that in the first book beginning, 'Let
the mad poets say whate'er they please,' and the first fifteen lines of
the second, where from the winning and truly poetic ease of his style at
its best, Keats relapses into something too like Leigh Hunt's and his own
early strain of affected ease and fireside triviality. He shows at the
same time signs of a return to his former rash experiments in language.
The positive virtues of beauty and felicity in his diction had never been
attended by the negative virtue of strict correctness: thus in the _Eve of
St Agnes_ we had to 'brook' tears for to check or forbear them, in
_Hyperion_ 'portion'd' for 'proportion'd;' eyes that 'fever out;' a
chariot 'foam'd along.' Some of these verbal licences possess a force that
makes them pass; but not so in _Lamia_ the adjectives 'psalterian' and
'piazzian,' the verb 'to labyrinth,' and the participle 'daft,' as if from
an imaginary active verb meaning to daze.

In the moral which the tale is made to illustrate there is moreover a
weakness. Keats himself gives us fair warning against attaching too much
importance to any opinion which in a momentary mood we may find him
uttering. But the doctrine he sets forth in _Lamia_ is one which from the
reports of his conversation we know him to have held with a certain
consistency:--

                  "Do not all charms fly
  At the mere touch of cold philosophy?
  There was an awful rainbow once in heaven;
  We know her woof, her texture; she is given
  In the dull catalogue of common things.
  Philosophy will clip an angel's wings,
  Conquer all mysteries by rule and line,
  Empty the haunted air and gnomed mine--
  Unweave a rainbow, as it erewhile made
  The tender-person'd Lamia melt into a shade."

Campbell has set forth the same doctrine more fully in _The Rainbow_: but
one sounder, braver, and of better hope, by which Keats would have done
well to stand, is preached by Wordsworth in his famous Preface.

Passing, now, from the narrative to the reflective portion of Keats's work
during this period--it was on the odes, we saw, that he was chiefly
occupied in the spring months of 1819, from the completion of _St Agnes'
Eve_ at Chichester in January until the commencement of _Lamia_ and _Otho
the Great_ at Shanklin in June. These odes of Keats constitute a class
apart in English literature, in form and manner neither lineally derived
from any earlier, nor much resembling any contemporary, verse. In what he
calls the 'roundelay' of the Indian maiden in _Endymion_ he had made his
most elaborate lyrical attempt until now; and while for once approaching
Shelley in lyric ardour and height of pitch, had equalled Coleridge in
touches of wild musical beauty and far-sought romance. His new odes are
comparatively simple and regular in form. They are written in a strain
intense indeed, but meditative and brooding, and quite free from the
declamatory and rhetorical elements which we are accustomed to associate
with the idea of an ode. Of the five composed in the spring of 1819, two,
those on _Psyche_ and the _Grecian Urn_, are inspired by the old Greek
world of imagination and art; two, those on _Melancholy_ and the
_Nightingale_, by moods of the poet's own mind; while the fifth, that on
_Indolence_, partakes in a weaker degree of both inspirations.

In the _Psyche_, (where the stanza is of a lengthened type approaching
those of Spenser's nuptial odes, but not regularly repeated,) Keats recurs
to a theme of which he had long been enamoured, as we know by the lines in
the opening poem of his first book, beginning--

  "So felt he, who first told how Psyche went
  On the smooth wind to realms of wonderment."

Following these lines, in his early piece, came others disfigured by
cloying touches of the kind too common in his love-scenes. Nor are like
touches quite absent from the ode: but they are more than compensated by
the exquisite freshness of the natural scenery where the mythic lovers are
disclosed--'Mid hush'd, cool-rooted flowers fragrant-eyed.' What other
poet has compressed into a single line so much of the true life and charm
of flowers, of their power to minister to the spirit of man through all
his senses at once? Such felicity in compound epithets is by this time
habitual with Keats, and of Spenser, with his 'sea-shouldering whales,' he
is now in his own manner the equal. The 'azure-lidded sleep' of the maiden
in _St Agnes' Eve_ is matched in this ode by the 'moss-lain Dryads' and
the 'soft-conchèd ear' of Psyche; though the last epithet perhaps jars on
us a little with a sense of oddity, like the 'cirque-couchant' snake in
_Lamia_. For the rest, there is certainly something strained in the turn
of thought and expression whereby the poet offers himself and the homage
of his own mind to the divinity he addresses, in lieu of the worship of
antiquity for which she came too late; and especially in the terms of the
metaphor which opens the famous fourth stanza:--

  "Yes, I will be thy priest, and build a fane
    In some untrodden region of my mind,
  Where branched thoughts, new-blown with pleasant pain,
    Instead of pines shall murmur in the wind."

Yet over such difficulties the true lover of poetry will find himself
swiftly borne, until he pauses breathless and delighted at the threshold
of the sanctuary prepared by the 'gardener Fancy,' his ear charmed by the
glow and music of the verse, with its hurrying pace and artfully iterated
vowels towards the close, his mind enthralled by the beauty of the
invocation and the imagery.

Less glowing, but of finer conception and more rare poetic value, is the
_Ode on a Grecian Urn_. Instead of the long and unequal stanza of the
_Psyche_, it is written in a regular stanza of five rhymes, the first two
arranged in a quatrain, and the second three in a sestet; a plan to which
Keats adhered in the rest of his odes, only varying the order of the
sestet, and in one instance--the ode to Melancholy--expanding it into a
septet. The sight, or the imagination, of a piece of ancient sculpture had
set the poet's mind at work, on the one hand conjuring up the scenes of
ancient life and worship which lay behind and suggested the sculptured
images; on the other, speculating on the abstract relations of plastic art
to life. The opening invocation is followed by a string of questions which
flash their own answer upon us out of the darkness of
antiquity--interrogatories which are at the same time pictures,--'What men
or gods are these, what maidens loth,' &c. The second and third stanzas
express with perfect poetic felicity and insight the vital differences
between life, which pays for its unique prerogative of reality by satiety
and decay, and art, which in forfeiting reality gains in exchange
permanence of beauty, and the power to charm by imagined experiences even
richer than the real. Then the questioning begins again, and yields the
incomparable choice of pictures,--

  "What little town by river or sea shore,
    Or mountain built with peaceful citadel,
      Is emptied of its folk, this pious morn?"

In the answering lines--

  "And, little town, thy streets for evermore
    Will silent be; and not a soul to tell
      Why thou art desolate, can e'er return,--"

in these lines there seems a dissonance, inasmuch as they speak of the
arrest of life as though it were an infliction in the sphere of reality,
and not merely, like the instances of such arrest given farther back, a
necessary condition in the sphere of art, having in that sphere its own
compensations. But it is a dissonance which the attentive reader can
easily reconcile for himself: and none but an attentive reader will notice
it. Finally, dropping the airy play of the mind backward and forward
between the two spheres, the poet consigns the work of ancient skill to
the future, to remain,--

                      "in midst of other woe
  Than ours, a friend to man, to whom thou say'st,
    Beauty is truth, truth beauty,--"

thus proclaiming, in the last words, what amidst the gropings of reason
and the flux of things is to the poet and artist--at least to one of
Keats's temper--an immutable law.

It seems clear that no single extant work of antiquity can have supplied
Keats with the suggestion for this poem. There exists, indeed, at Holland
House an urn wrought with just such a scene of pastoral sacrifice as is
described in his fourth stanza[58]: and of course no subject is commoner
in Greek relief-sculpture than a Bacchanalian procession. But the two
subjects do not, so far as I know, occur together on any single work of
ancient art: and Keats probably imagined his urn by a combination of
sculptures actually seen in the British Museum with others known to him
only from engravings, and particularly from Piranesi's etchings. Lord
Holland's urn is duly figured in the _Vasi e Candelabri_ of that admirable
master. From the old Leigh Hunt days Keats had been fond of what he
calls--

              "the pleasant flow
  Of words at opening a portfolio:"

and in the scene of sacrifice in _Endymion_ (Book L, 136-163) we may
perhaps already find a proof of familiarity with this particular print, as
well as an anticipation of the more masterly poetic rendering of the
subject in the ode.

The ode _On Indolence_ stands midway, not necessarily in date of
composition, but in scope and feeling, between the two Greek and the two
personal odes, as I have above distinguished them. In it Keats again calls
up the image of a marble urn, but not for its own sake, only to illustrate
the guise in which he feigns the allegoric presences of Love, Ambition,
and Poetry to have appeared to him in a day-dream. This ode, less highly
wrought and more unequal than the rest, contains the imaginative record
of a passing mood (mentioned also in his correspondence) when the wonted
intensity of his emotional life was suspended under the spell of an
agreeable physical languor. Well had it been for him had such moods come
more frequently to give him rest. Most sensitive among the sons of men,
the sources of joy and pain lay close together in his nature: and
unsatisfied passion kept both sources filled to bursting. One of the
attributes he assigns to his enchantress Lamia is a

                        "sciential brain
  To unperplex bliss from its neighbour pain."

In the fragmentary ode _On Melancholy_ (which has no proper beginning, its
first stanza having been discarded) he treats the theme of Beaumont and of
Milton in a manner entirely his own: expressing his experience of the
habitual interchange and alternation of emotions of joy and pain with a
characteristic easy magnificence of imagery and style:--

  "Aye, in the very Temple of Delight
    Veil'd Melancholy has her sovereign shrine,
      Though known to none save him whose strenuous tongue
  Can burst joy's grape against his palate fine:
    His soul shall taste the sadness of her might,
      And be among her cloudy trophies hung."

The same crossing and intermingling of opposite currents of feeling finds
expression, together with unequalled touches of the poet's feeling for
nature and romance, in the _Ode to a Nightingale_. Just as his Grecian urn
was no single specimen of antiquity that he had seen, so it is not the
particular nightingale he had heard singing in the Hampstead garden that
he in his poem invokes, but a type of the race imagined as singing in some
far-off scene of woodland mystery and beauty. Thither he sighs to follow
her: first by aid of the spell of some southern vintage--a spell which he
makes us realize in lines redolent of the southern richness and joy. Then
follows a contrasted vision of all his own and mankind's tribulations
which he will leave behind him. Nay, he needs not the aid of
Bacchus,--Poetry alone shall transport him. For a moment he mistrusts her
power, but the next moment finds himself where he would be, listening to
the imagined song in the imagined woodland, and divining in the darkness,
by that gift whereby his mind is a match for nature, all the secrets of
the season and the night. In this joy he remembers how often the thought
of death has seemed welcome to him, and thinks it would be more welcome
now than ever. The nightingale would not cease her song--and here, by a
breach of logic which is also, I think, a flaw in the poetry, he contrasts
the transitoriness of human life, meaning the life of the individual, with
the permanence of the song-bird's life, meaning the life of the type. This
last thought leads him off into the ages, whence he brings back those
memorable touches of far-off Bible and legendary romance in the stanza
closing with the words 'in faery lands forlorn': and then, catching up his
own last word, 'forlorn,' with an abrupt change of mood and meaning, he
returns to daily consciousness, and with the fading away of his forest
dream the poem closes. In this group of the odes it takes rank beside the
_Grecian Urn_ in the other. Neither is strictly faultless, but such
revealing imaginative insight and such conquering poetic charm, the touch
that in striking so lightly strikes so deep, who does not prefer to
faultlessness? Both odes are among the veriest glories of our poetry. Both
are at the same time too long and too well known to quote. Let us
therefore place here, as an example of this class of Keats's work, the
ode _To Autumn_, which is the last he wrote, and contains the record of
his quiet September days at Winchester. It opens out, indeed, no such
far-reaching avenues of thought and feeling as the two last mentioned, but
in execution is perhaps the completest of them all. In the first stanza
the bounty, in the last the pensiveness, of the time are expressed in
words so transparent and direct that we almost forget they are words at
all, and nature herself and the season seem speaking to us: while in the
middle stanza the touches of literary art and Greek personification have
an exquisite congruity and lightness.

  "Season of mists and mellow fruitfulness,
    Close bosom-friend of the maturing sun;
  Conspiring with him how to load and bless
    With fruit the vines that round the thatch-eaves run;
  To bend with apples the moss'd cottage trees,
    And fill all fruit with ripeness to the core;
  To swell the gourd, and plump the hazel shells
    With a sweet kernel; to set budding more,
  And still more, later flowers for the bees,
  Until they think warm days will never cease,
    For Summer has o'er-brimm'd their clammy cells.

  Who hath not seen thee oft amid thy store?
    Sometimes whoever seeks abroad may find
  Thee sitting careless on a granary floor,
    Thy hair soft-lifted by the winnowing wind;
  Or on a half-reap'd furrow sound asleep,
    Drows'd with the fume of poppies, while thy hook
      Spares the next swath and all its twined flowers:
  And sometimes like a gleaner thou dost keep
    Steady thy laden head across a brook;
    Or by a cider-press, with patient look,
      Thou watchest the last oozings hours by hours.

  Where are the songs of Spring? Ay, where are they?
    Think not of them, thou hast thy music too,--
  While barred clouds bloom the soft-dying day,
    And touch the stubble-plains with rosy hue;
  Then in a wailful choir the small gnats mourn
    Among the river sallows, borne aloft
      Or sinking as the light wind lives or dies;
  And full-grown lambs loud bleat from hilly bourn;
    Hedge-crickets sing; and now with treble soft
    The red-breast whistles from a garden-croft;
      And gathering swallows twitter in the skies."

To pass from our poet's work at this time in the several fields of
romance, epic, ballad, and ode, to those in the field of drama, is to pass
from a region of happy and assured conquest to one of failure, though of
failure not unredeemed by auguries of future success, had any future been
in store for him. At his age no man has ever been a master in the drama:
even by the most powerful intuitive genius, neither human nature nor the
difficulties of the art itself can be so early mastered. The manner in
which Keats wrote his first play, merely supplying the words to a plot
contrived as they went along by a friend of gifts radically inferior to
his own, was moreover the least favourable that he could have attempted.
He brought to the task the mastery over poetic colour and diction which we
have seen: he brought an impassioned sentiment of romance, and a mind
prepared to enter by sympathy into the hearts of men and women: while
Brown contributed his amateur stage-craft, such as it was. But these
things were not enough. The power of sympathetic insight had not yet
developed in Keats into one of dramatic creation: and the joint work of
the friends is confused in order and sequence, and far from masterly in
conception. Keats indeed makes the characters speak in lines flashing
with all the hues of poetry. But in themselves they have the effect only
of puppets inexpertly agitated: Otho, a puppet type of royal dignity and
fatherly affection, Ludolph of febrile passion and vacillation, Erminia of
maidenly purity, Conrad and Auranthe of ambitious lust and treachery. At
least until the end of the fourth act these strictures hold good. From
that point Keats worked alone, and the fifth act, probably in consequence,
shows a great improvement. There is a real dramatic effect, of the violent
kind affected by the old English drama, in the disclosure of the body of
Auranthe, dead indeed, at the moment when Ludolph in his madness vainly
imagines himself to have slain her: and some of the speeches in which his
frenzy breaks forth remind us strikingly of Marlowe, not only by their
pomp of poetry and allusion, but by the tumult of the soul and senses
expressed in them. Of the second historical play, _King Stephen_, which
Keats began by himself at Winchester, too little was written to afford
matter for a safe judgment. The few scenes he finished are not only marked
by his characteristic splendour and felicity of phrase: they are full of a
spirit of heady action and the stir of battle: qualities which he had not
shown in any previous work, and for which we might have doubted his
capacity had not this fragment been preserved.

But in the mingling of his soul's and body's destinies it had been
determined that neither this nor any other of his powers should be
suffered to ripen farther upon earth.




CHAPTER VIII.

    Return to Wentworth Place--Autumn occupations: The _Cap and Bells_:
    Recast of _Hyperion_--Growing despondency--Visit of George Keats to
    England--Attack of Illness in February--Rally in the Spring--Summer in
    Kentish Town--Publication of the _Lamia_ volume--Relapse--Ordered
    South--Voyage to Italy--Naples--Rome--Last Days and Death. [October
    1819-Feb. 1821.]


We left Keats at Winchester, with _Otho_, _Lamia_, and the _Ode to Autumn_
just written, and with his mind set on trying to face life sanely, and
take up arms like other men against his troubles, instead of letting
imagination magnify and passion exasperate them as heretofore. At his
request Dilke took for him a lodging in his own neighbourhood in
Westminster (25 College Street), and here Keats came on the 8th of October
to take up his quarters. But alas! his blood proved traitor to his will:
and the plan of life and literary work in London broke down at once on
trial. The gain of health and composure which he thought he had made at
Winchester proved illusory, or at least could only be maintained at a
distance from the great perturbing cause. Two days after his return he
went to Hampstead--'into the fire'--and in a moment the flames had seized
him more fiercely than ever. It was the first time he had seen his
mistress for four months. He found her kind, and from that hour was
utterly passion's slave again. In the solitude of his London lodging he
found that he could not work nor rest nor fix his thoughts. He must send
her a line, he writes to Fanny Brawne two days later, "and see if that
will assist in dismissing you from my mind for ever so short a time. Upon
my soul I can think of nothing else.... I cannot exist without you. I am
forgetful of everything but seeing you again--my life seems to stop
there--I see no further. You have absorb'd me." A three days' visit at her
mother's house, followed by another of a day or two at the Dilkes', ended
in his giving up all resistance to the spell. Within ten days, apparently,
of his return from Winchester, he had settled again at Hampstead under
Brown's roof, next door to the home of his joy and torment. He writes with
a true foreboding: "I shall be able to do nothing. I should like to cast
the die for Love or Death.--I have no patience with anything else."

It was for death that the die was cast, and from the date of his return to
Wentworth Place in October, 1819, begins the melancholy closing chapter of
Keats's history. Of the triple flame which was burning away his life, the
flame of genius, of passion, and of disease, while the last kept
smouldering in secret, the second burnt every day more fiercely, and the
first began from this time forth to sink. Not that he was idle during the
ensuing season of autumn and early winter; but the work he did was marked
both by infirmity of purpose and failure of power. For the present he
determined not to publish _Lamia_, _Isabella_, and the other poems written
since _Endymion_. He preferred to await the result of Brown's attempt to
get _Otho_ brought on the stage, thinking, no doubt justly, that a success
in that field would help to win a candid hearing for his poetry. In the
meantime the scoffs of the party critics had brought him so low in
estimation that Brown in sending in the play thought it best to withhold
his friend's name. The great hope of the authors was that Kean would see
an opportunity for himself in the part of Ludolph. In this they were not
disappointed: the play was accepted: but Elliston, the manager, proposing
to keep it back till the next season or the next but one, Keats and Brown
objected to the delay, and about Christmas transferred the offer of their
MS. to Covent Garden, where Macready, under Harris's management, was at
this time beginning to act the leading parts. It was after a while
returned unopened, and with that the whole matter seems to have dropped.

In the meanwhile tragedy was still the goal towards which Keats bent his
hopes. "One of my ambitions," he had written to Bailey from Winchester,
"is to make as great a revolution in modern dramatic writing as Kean has
done in acting." And now, in a letter to Mr Taylor of Nov. 17, he says
that to write a few fine plays is still his greatest ambition, when he
does feel ambitious, which is very seldom. The little dramatic skill he
may as yet have, however badly it might show in a drama, would, he
conceives, be sufficient for a poem; and what he wishes to do next is "to
diffuse the colouring of _St Agnes' Eve_ throughout a poem in which
character and sentiment would be the figures to such drapery." Two or
three such poems would be, he thinks, the best _gradus_ to the _Parnassum
altissimum_ of true dramatic writing. Meantime, he is for the moment
engaged on a task of a different nature. "As the marvellous is the most
enticing, and the surest guarantee of harmonious numbers, I have been
endeavouring to persuade myself to untether Fancy, and to let her manage
for herself. I and myself cannot agree about this at all." The piece to
which Keats here alludes is evidently the satirical fairy poem of the _Cap
and Bells_, on which we know him to have been at this time busy. Writing
of the autumn days immediately following their return to Wentworth Place,
Brown says:--

    "By chance our conversation turned on the idea of a comic faery poem
    in the Spenser stanza, and I was glad to encourage it. He had not
    composed many stanzas before he proceeded in it with spirit. It was to
    be published under the feigned authorship of 'Lucy Vaughan Lloyd,' and
    to bear the title of the _Cap and Bells_, or, which he preferred, the
    _Jealousies_. This occupied his mornings pleasantly. He wrote it with
    the greatest facility; in one instance I remember having copied (for I
    copied as he wrote) as many as twelve stanzas before dinner[59]."

Excellent friend as Brown was to Keats, he was not the most judicious
adviser in matters of literature, and the attempt made in the _Cap and
Bells_ to mingle with the strain of fairy fancy a strain of worldly
flippancy and satire was one essentially alien to Keats's nature. As long
as health and spirits lasted, he was often full, as we have seen, of
pleasantry and nonsense: but his wit was essentially amiable[60], and he
was far too tender-hearted ever to be a satirist. Moreover the spirit of
poetry in him was too intense and serious to work hand-in-hand with the
spirit of banter, as poetry and banter had gone hand-in-hand in some of
the metrical romances of the Italian Renaissance, and again, with
unprecedented dexterity and brilliance, in the early cantos of _Don
Juan_. It was partly the influence of the facetious Brown, who was a great
student of Pulci and Boiardo, partly that of his own recent Italian
studies, and partly the dazzling example of Byron's success, that now
induced Keats to make an attempt in the same dual strain. Having already
employed the measure most fit for such an attempt, the _ottava rima_ of
the Italians, in his serious poem of _Isabella_, he now, by what seems an
odd technical perversity, adopted for his comic poem the grave Spenserian
stanza, with its sustained and involved rhymes and its long-drawn close.
Working thus in a vein not truly his own, and hampered moreover by his
choice of metre, Keats nevertheless manages his transitions from grave to
gay with a light hand, and the movement of the _Cap and Bells_ has much of
his characteristic suppleness and grace. In other respects the poem is not
a success. The story, which appears to have been one of his own and
Brown's invention, turned on the perverse loves of a fairy emperor and a
fairy princess of the East. The two are unwillingly betrothed, each being
meanwhile enamoured of a mortal. The eighty-eight stanzas, which were all
that Keats wrote of the poem, only carry us as far as the flight of the
emperor Elfinan for England, which takes place at the moment when his
affianced bride alights from her aerial journey to his capital. Into the
Elfinan part of the story Keats makes it clear that he meant somehow to
weave in the same tale which had been in his mind when he began the
fragment of _St Mark's Eve_ at the beginning of the year,--the tale of an
English Bertha living in a minster city and beguiled in some way through
the reading of a magic book. With this and other purely fanciful elements
of the story are mixed up satirical allusions to the events of the day.
It was in this year, 1819, that the quarrels between the Prince Regent and
his wife were drawing to a head: the public mind was full of the subject:
and the general sympathy was vehemently aroused on the side of the
scandalous lady in opposition to her thrice scandalous husband. The
references to these royal quarrels and intrigues in the _Cap and Bells_
are general rather than particular, although here and there individual
names and characters are glanced at: as when 'Esquire Biancopany' stands
manifestly, as Mr Forman has pointed out, for Whitbread. But the social
and personal satire of the piece is in truth aimless and weak enough. As
Keats had not the heart, so neither had he the worldly experience, for
this kind of work; and beside the blaze of the Byronic wit and devilry his
raillery seems but child's play. Where the fun is of the purely fanciful
and fairy kind, he shows abundance of adroitness and invention, and in
passages not humorous is sometimes really himself, his imagination
becoming vivid and alert, and his style taking on its own happy light and
colour,--but seldom for more than a stanza or half-stanza at a time.

Besides his morning task in Brown's company on the _Cap and Bells_, Keats
had other work on hand during this November and December. "In the
evenings," writes Brown, "at his own desire, he occupied a separate
apartment, and was deeply engaged in re-modelling the fragment of
_Hyperion_ into the form of a Vision." The result of this attempt, which
has been preserved, is of a singular and pathetic interest in Keats's
history. We have seen how, in the previous August, he had grown
discontented with the style and diction of _Hyperion_, as being too
artificial and Miltonic. Now, in the decline of his powers, he took the
poem up again[61], and began to re-write and greatly amplify it; partly,
it would seem, through a mere relapse into his old fault of overloading,
partly through a desire to give expression to thoughts and feelings which
were pressing on his mind. His new plan was to relate the fall of the
Titans, not, as before, in direct narrative, but in the form of a vision
revealed and interpreted to him by a goddess of the fallen race. The
reader remembers how he had broken off his work on _Hyperion_ at the point
where Mnemosyne is enkindling the brain of Apollo with the inspiration of
her ancient wisdom. Following a clue which he had found in a Latin book of
mythology he had lately bought[62], he now identifies this Greek
Mnemosyne, the mother of the Muses, with the Roman Moneta; and (being
possibly also aware that the temple of Juno Moneta on the Capitol at Rome
was not far from that of Saturn) makes his Mnemosyne-Moneta the priestess
and guardian of Saturn's temple. His vision takes him first into a grove
or garden of delicious fruits, having eaten of which he sinks into a
slumber, and awakes to find himself on the floor of a huge primeval
temple. Presently a voice, the voice of Moneta, whose form he cannot yet
see for the fumes of incense, summons him to climb the steps leading to an
image beside which she is offering sacrifice. Obeying her with difficulty,
he questions her concerning the mysteries of the place, and learns from
her, among other knowledge, that he is standing in the temple of Saturn.
Then she withdraws the veils from her face, at sight of which he feels an
irresistible desire to learn her thoughts; and thereupon finds himself
conveyed in a trance by her side to the ancient scene of Saturn's
overthrow. 'Deep in the shady sadness of a vale,' &c.,--from this point
Keats begins to weave into the new tissue of his _Vision_ the text of the
original _Hyperion_; with alterations which are in almost all cases for
the worse. Neither does the new portion of his work well match the old.
Side by side with impressive passages, it contains others where both
rhythm and diction flag, and in comparison depends for its beauty far more
on single lines and passages, and less on sustained effects. Keats has
indeed imagined nothing richer or purer than the feast of fruits at the
opening of the _Vision_, and of supernatural presences he has perhaps
conjured up none of such melancholy beauty and awe as that of the
priestess when she removes her veils. But the especial interest of the
poem lies in the light which it throws on the inward distresses of his
mind, and on the conception he had by this time come to entertain of the
poet's character and lot. When Moneta bids him mount the steps to her
side, she warns him that if he fails to do so he is bound to perish
utterly where he stands. In fact he all but dies before he reaches the
stair, but reviving, ascends and learns from her the meaning of the
ordeal:--

  "None can usurp this height," returned that shade,
  "But those to whom the miseries of the world
  Are misery, and will not let them rest.
  All else who find a haven in the world,
  Where they may thoughtless sleep away their days,
  If by a chance into this fane they come,
  Rot on the pavement where thou rottedst half."
  "Are there not thousands in the world," said I,
  Encouraged by the sooth voice of the shade,
  "Who love their fellows even to the death,
  Who feel the giant agony of the world,
  And more, like slaves to poor humanity,
  Labour for mortal good? I sure should see
  Other men here, but I am here alone."
  "Those whom thou spakest of are no visionaries,"
  Rejoin'd that voice; "they are no dreamers weak;
  They seek no wonder but the human face,
  No music but a happy-noted voice:
  They come not here, they have no thought to come;
  And thou art here, for thou art less than they.
  What benefit canst thou do, or all thy tribe,
  To the great world? Thou art a dreaming thing,
  A fever of thyself: think of the earth:
  What bliss, even in hope, is there for thee?
  What haven? Every creature hath its home,
  Every sole man hath days of joy and pain,
  Whether his labours be sublime or low--
  The pain alone, the joy alone, distinct:
  Only the dreamer venoms all his days,
  Bearing more woe than all his sins deserve.
  Therefore, that happiness be somewhat shared,
  Such things as thou art are admitted oft
  Into like gardens thou didst pass erewhile,
  And suffer'd in these temples--"[63].

Tracing the process of Keats's thought through this somewhat obscure
imagery,--the poet, he means, is one who to indulge in dreams withdraws
himself from the wholesome activities of ordinary men. At first he is
lulled to sleep by the sweets of poetry (the fruits of the garden):
awakening, he finds himself on the floor of a solemn temple, with
Mnemosyne, the mother and inspirer of song, enthroned all but inaccessibly
above him. If he is a trifler indifferent to the troubles of his fellow
men, he is condemned to perish swiftly and be forgotten: he is suffered to
approach the goddess, to commune with her and catch her inspiration, only
on condition that he shares all those troubles and makes them his own. And
even then, his portion is far harder and less honourable than that of
common men. In the conception Keats here expresses of the human mission
and responsibility of his art there is nothing new. Almost from the first
dawning of his ambition, he had looked beyond the mere sweets of poetry
towards--

                  "a nobler life,
  Where I may find the agonies, the strife
  Of human hearts."

What is new is the bitterness with which he speaks of the poet's lot even
at its best.

  "Only the dreamer venoms all his days,
  Bearing more woe than all his sins deserve,"

--through what a circle must the spirit of Keats, when this bitter cry
broke from him, have travelled since the days, only three years before,
when he was never tired of singing by anticipation the joys and glories of
the poetic life:--

  "These are the living pleasures of the bard,
  But richer far posterity's award.
  What shall he murmur with his latest breath,
  When his proud eye looks through the film of death?"--

His present cry in its bitterness is in truth a cry not so much of the
spirit as of the flesh, or rather of the spirit vanquished by the flesh.
The wasting of his vital powers by latent disease was turning all his
sensations and emotions into pain--at once darkening the shadow of
impending poverty, increasing the natural importunity of ill-boding
instincts at his heart, and exasperating into agony the unsatisfied
cravings of his passion. In verses at this time addressed, though
doubtless not shown, to his mistress, he exclaims once and again in tones
like this:--

    "Where shall I learn to get my peace again?"--

            --"O for some sunny spell
  To dissipate the shadows of this hell":--

or at the conclusion of a piteous sonnet:--

  "Yourself--your soul--in pity give me all,
    Withhold no atom's atom or I die,
  Or living on perhaps, your wretched thrall,
    Forget, in the mist of idle misery,
  Life's purposes,--the palate of the mind
  Losing its gust, and my ambition blind."

That he might win peace by marriage with the object of his passion does
not seem to have occurred to Keats as possible in the present state of his
fortunes. "However selfishly I may feel," he had written to her some
months earlier, "I am sure I could never act selfishly." The Brawnes on
their part were comfortably off, but what his instincts of honour and
independence forbade him to ask, hers of tenderness could perhaps hardly
be expected to offer. As the autumn wore into winter, Keats's sufferings,
disguise them as he might, could not escape the notice of his affectionate
comrade Brown. Without understanding the cause, Brown was not slow to
perceive the effect, and to realise how vain were the assurances Keats had
given him at Winchester, that the pressure of real troubles would stiffen
him against troubles of imagination, and that he was not and would not
allow himself to be unhappy.

    "I quickly perceived," writes Brown, "that he was more so than I had
    feared; his abstraction, his occasional lassitude of mind, and,
    frequently, his assumed tranquillity of countenance gave me great
    uneasiness. He was unwilling to speak on the subject; and I could do
    no more than attempt, indirectly, to cheer him with hope, avoiding
    that word however.... All that a friend could say, or offer, or urge,
    was not enough to heal his many wounds. He listened, and in kindness,
    or soothed by kindness, showed tranquillity, but nothing from a friend
    could relieve him, except on a matter of inferior trouble. He was too
    thoughtful, or too unquiet, and he began to be reckless of health.
    Among other proofs of recklessness, he was secretly taking, at times,
    a few drops of laudanum to keep up his spirits. It was discovered by
    accident, and without delay, revealed to me. He needed not to be
    warned of the danger of such a habit; but I rejoiced at his promise
    never to take another drop without my knowledge; for nothing could
    induce him to break his word when once given,--which was a difficulty.
    Still, at the very moment of my being rejoiced, this was an additional
    proof of his rooted misery"[64].

Some of the same symptoms were observed by Haydon, and have been described
by him with his usual reckless exaggeration, and love of contrasting
another's weakness with his own strength[65]. To his friends in general
Keats bore himself as affectionately as ever, but they began to notice
that he had lost his cheerfulness. One of them, Severn, at this time
competed for and carried off (December 9, 1819) the annual gold medal of
the Academy for a historical painting, which had not been adjudged for
several years. The subject was Spenser's 'Cave of Despair.' We hear of
Keats flinging out in anger from among a company of elder artists where
the deserts of the winner were disparaged; and we find him making an
appointment with Severn to go and see his prize picture,--adding, however,
parenthetically from his troubled heart, "You had best put me into your
Cave of Despair." In December his letters to his sister make mention
several times of ill health, and once of a suggestion which had been made
to him by Mr Abbey, and which for a moment he was willing to entertain,
that he should take advantage of an opening in the tea-broking line in
connection with that gentleman's business. Early in January, 1820, George
Keats appeared on a short visit to London. He was now settled with his
wife and child in the far West, at Louisville on the Ohio. Here his first
trading adventure had failed, owing, as he believed, to the dishonesty of
the naturalist Audubon who was concerned in it; and he was brought to
England by the necessity of getting possession, from the reluctant Abbey,
of a further portion of the scanty funds still remaining to the brothers
from their grandmother's gift. His visit lasted only three weeks, during
which John made no attempt to unbosom himself to him as of old. "He was
not the same being," wrote George, looking back on the time some years
afterwards; "although his reception of me was as warm as heart could wish,
he did not speak with his former openness and unreserve, he had lost the
reviving custom of venting his griefs." In a letter which the poet wrote
to his sister-in-law while her husband was in England, he attempts to keep
up the old vein of lively affectionate fun and spirits, but soon falls
involuntarily into one of depression and irritation against the world. Of
his work he says nothing, and it is clear from Brown's narrative that
both his morning and his evening task--the _Cap and Bells_ and the
_Vision_--had been dropped some time before this[66], and left in the
fragmentary state in which we possess them.

George left for Liverpool on Friday Jan. 28. A few days later Keats was
seized by the first overt attack of the fatal mischief which had been set
up in his constitution by the exertions of his Scotch tour, and which
recent agitations, and perhaps imprudences, had aggravated.

    "One night," writes Brown--it was on the Thursday Feb. 3--"at eleven
    o'clock, he came into the house in a state that looked like fierce
    intoxication. Such a state in him, I knew, was impossible[67]; it
    therefore was the more fearful. I asked hurriedly, 'What is the
    matter? you are fevered?' 'Yes, yes,' he answered, 'I was on the
    outside of the stage this bitter day till I was severely chilled,--but
    now I don't feel it. Fevered!--of course, a little.' He mildly and
    instantly yielded, a property in his nature towards any friend, to my
    request that he should go to bed. I followed with the best immediate
    remedy in my power. I entered his chamber as he leapt into bed. On
    entering the cold sheets, before his head was on the pillow, he
    slightly coughed, and I heard him say,--'That is blood from my mouth.'
    I went towards him; he was examining a single drop of blood upon the
    sheet. 'Bring me the candle, Brown, and let me see this blood.' After
    regarding it steadfastly, he looked up in my face, with a calmness of
    countenance that I can never forget, and said,--'I know the colour of
    that blood;--it is arterial blood;--I cannot be deceived in that
    colour;--that drop of blood is my death-warrant;--I must die.' I ran
    for a surgeon; my friend was bled; and, at five in the morning, I left
    him after he had been some time in a quiet sleep."

Keats knew his case, and from the first moment had foreseen the issue
truly. He survived for twelve months longer, but the remainder of his life
was but a life-in-death. How many are there among us to whom such
_lacrymae rerum_ come not home? Happy at least are they whose lives this
curse consumption has not darkened with sorrow unquenchable for losses
past, with apprehensions never at rest for those to come,--who know not
what it is to watch, in some haven of delusive hope, under Mediterranean
palms, or amid the glittering winter peace of Alpine snows, their dearest
and their brightest perish. The malady in Keats's case ran through the
usual phases of deceptive rally and inevitable relapse. The doctors would
not admit that his lungs were injured, and merely prescribed a lowering
regimen and rest from mental excitement. The weakness and nervous
prostration of the patient were at first excessive, and he could bear to
see nobody but Brown, who nursed him affectionately day and night. After a
week or so he was able to receive little daily visits from his betrothed,
and to keep up a constant interchange of notes with her. A hint, which his
good feelings wrung from him, that under the circumstances he ought to
release her from her engagement, was not accepted, and for a time he
became quieter and more composed. To his sister at Walthamstow he wrote
often and cheerfully from his sickbed, and pleasant letters to some of his
men friends: among them one to James Rice, which contains this often
quoted and touching picture of his state of mind:--

    "I may say that for six months before I was taken ill I had not passed
    a tranquil day. Either that gloom overspread me, or I was suffering
    under some passionate feeling, or if I turned to versify that
    acerbated the poison of either sensation. The beauties of nature had
    lost their power over me. How astonishingly (here I must premise that
    illness, as far as I can judge in so short a time, has relieved my
    mind of a load of deceptive thoughts and images, and makes me perceive
    things in a truer light),--how astonishingly does the chance of
    leaving the world impress a sense of its natural beauties upon us!
    Like poor Falstaff, though I do not 'babble,' I think of green fields;
    I muse with the greatest affection on every flower I have known from
    my infancy--their shapes and colours are as new to me as if I had just
    created them with a super-human fancy."

The greatest pleasure he had experienced in life, Keats said at another
time, was in watching the growth of flowers: and in a discussion on the
literary merits of the Bible he once, says Hazlitt, found fault with the
Hebrew poetry for saying so little about them. What he wants to see again,
he writes now further from his sickbed, are 'the simple flowers of our
spring.' And in the course of April, after being nearly two months a
prisoner, he began gradually to pick up strength and get about. Even as
early as the twenty-fifth of March, we hear of him going into London, to
the private view of Haydon's 'Entry into Jerusalem,' where the painter
tells how he found him and Hazlitt in a corner, 'really rejoicing.'
Keats's friends, in whose minds his image had always been associated with
the ideas of intense vitality and of fame in store, could not bring
themselves to believe but that he would recover. Brown had arranged to
start early in May on a second walking-tour in Scotland, and the doctor
actually advised Keats to go with him: a folly on which he knew his own
state too well to venture. He went with Brown on the smack as far as
Gravesend, and then returned; not to Hampstead, but to a lodging in
Wesleyan Place, Kentish Town. He had chosen this neighbourhood for the
sake of the companionship of Leigh Hunt, who was living in Mortimer
Street close by. Keats remained at Wesleyan Place for about seven weeks
during May and June, living an invalid life, and occasionally taking
advantage of the weather to go to an exhibition in London or for a drive
on Hampstead Heath. During the first weeks of his illness he had been
strictly enjoined to avoid not only the excitement of writing, but even
that of reading, poetry. About this time he speaks of intending to begin
(meaning begin again) soon on the _Cap and Bells_. But in fact the only
work he really did was that of seeing through the press, with some slight
revision of the text, the new volume of poems which his friends had at
last induced him to put forward. This is the immortal volume containing
_Lamia_, _Isabella_, _The Eve of St Agnes_, _Hyperion_, and the _Odes_. Of
the poems written during Keats's twenty months of inspiration from March
1818 to October 1819, none of importance are omitted except the _Eve of St
Mark_, the _Ode on Indolence_, and _La Belle Dame sans Merci_. The first
Keats no doubt thought too fragmentary, and the second too unequal: La
Belle Dame sans Merci he had let Hunt have for his periodical _The
Indicator_, where it was printed (with alterations not for the better) on
May 20, 1820. _Hyperion_, as the publishers mention in a note, was only at
their special desire included in the book: it is given in its original
shape, the poet's friends, says Brown, having made him feel that they
thought the re-cast no improvement. The volume came out in the first week
of July. An admirably kind and discreet review by Leigh Hunt appeared in
the _Indicator_ at the beginning of August[68]: and in the same month
Jeffrey in the _Edinburgh Review_ for the first time broke silence in
Keats's favour. The impression made on the more intelligent order of
readers may be inferred from the remarks of Crabb Robinson in his
_Diaries_ for the following December[69]. "My book has had good success
among the literary people," wrote Keats a few weeks after its appearance,
"and I believe has a moderate sale."

But had the success been even far greater than it was, Keats was in no
heart and no health for it to cheer him. Passion with lack of hope were
working havoc in his blood, and frustrating any efforts of nature towards
recovery. The relapse was not long delayed. Fresh hæmorrhages occurring on
the 22nd and 23rd of June, he moved from his lodgings in Wesleyan Place to
be nursed by the Hunts at their house in Mortimer Street. Here everything
was done that kindness could suggest to keep him amused and comforted: but
all in vain: he "would keep his eyes fixed all day," as he afterwards
avowed, on Hampstead; and once when at Hunt's suggestion they took a drive
in that direction, and rested on a seat in Well Walk, he burst into a
flood of unwonted tears, and declared his heart was breaking. In writing
to Fanny Brawne he at times cannot disguise nor control his misery, but
breaks into piteous outcries, the complaints of one who feels himself
chained and desperate while mistress and friends are free, and whose heart
is racked between desire and helplessness, and a thousand daily pangs of
half-frantic jealousy and suspicion. "Hamlet's heart was full of such
misery as mine is when he said to Ophelia, 'Go to a nunnery, go, go!'"
Keats when he wrote thus was not himself, but only in his own words, 'a
fever of himself:' and to seek cause for his complaints in anything but
his own distempered state would be unjust equally to his friends and his
betrothed. Wound as they might at the time, we know from her own words
that they left no impression of unkindness on her memory[70].

Such at this time was Keats's condition that the slightest shock unmanned
him, and he could not bear the entrance of an unexpected person or
stranger. After he had been some seven weeks with the Hunts, it happened
on the 12th of August, through the misconduct of a servant, that a note
from Fanny Brawne was delivered to him opened and two days late. This
circumstance, we are told, so affected him that he could not endure to
stay longer in the house, but left it instantly, intending to go back to
his old lodgings in Well Walk. The Brawnes, however, would not suffer
this, but took him into their own home and nursed him. Under the eye and
tendance of his betrothed, he found during the next few weeks some
mitigation of his sufferings. Haydon came one day to see him, and has
told, with a painter's touch, how he found him "lying in a white bed, with
white quilt, and white sheets, the only colour visible was the hectic
flush of his cheeks. He was deeply affected and so was I[71]." Ever since
his relapse at the end of June, Keats had been warned by the doctors that
a winter in England would be too much for him, and had been trying to
bring himself to face the prospect of a journey to Italy. The Shelleys had
heard through the Gisbornes of Keats's relapse, and Shelley now wrote in
terms of the most delicate and sympathetic kindness inviting him to come
and take up his residence with them at Pisa. This letter reached Keats
immediately after his return to Hampstead. He replied in an uncertain
tone, showing himself deeply touched by the Shelleys' friendship, but as
to the _Cenci_, which had just been sent him, and generally as to
Shelley's and his own work in poetry, finding nothing very cordial or much
to the purpose to say.

As to the plan of wintering in Italy, Keats had by this time made up his
mind to try it, "as a soldier marches up to a battery." His hope was that
Brown would accompany him, but the letters he had written to that friend
in the Highlands were delayed in delivery, and the time for Keats's
departure was fast approaching while Brown still remained in ignorance of
his purpose. In the meantime another companion offered himself in the
person of Severn, who having won, as we have seen, the gold medal of the
Royal Academy the year before, determined now to go and work at Rome with
a view to competing for the travelling studentship. Keats and Severn
accordingly took passage for Naples on board the ship 'Maria Crowther,'
which sailed from London on Sept. 18[72]. Several of the friends who loved
Keats best went on board with him as far as Gravesend, and among them Mr
Taylor, who had just helped him with money for his journey by the purchase
for £100 of the copyright of _Endymion_. As soon as the ill news of his
health reached Brown in Scotland, he hastened to make the best of his way
south, and for that purpose caught a smack at Dundee, which arrived in the
Thames on the same evening as the 'Maria Crowther' sailed: so that the two
friends lay on that night within hail of one another off Gravesend
unawares.

The voyage at first seemed to do Keats good, and Severn was struck by his
vigour of appetite and apparent cheerfulness. The fever of travel and
change is apt to produce this deceptive effect in a consumptive patient,
and in Keats's case, aided by his invincible spirit of pleasantness to
those about him, it was sufficient to disguise his sufferings, and to
raise the hopes of his companion throughout the voyage and for some time
afterwards. Contrary winds held them beating about the Channel, and ten
days after starting they had got no farther than Portsmouth, where Keats
landed for a day, and paid a visit to his friends at Bedhampton. On board
ship in the Solent immediately afterwards he wrote to Brown a letter
confiding to him the secret of his torments more fully than he had ever
confided it face to face. Even if his body would recover of itself, his
passion, he says would prevent it. "The very thing which I want to live
most for will be a great occasion of my death. I cannot help it. Who can
help it? Were I in health it would make me ill, and how can I bear it in
my state? I wish for death every day and night to deliver me from these
pains, and then I wish death away, for death would destroy even these
pains, which are better than nothing. Land and sea, weakness and decline,
are great separators, but Death is the great divorcer for ever."

On the night when Keats wrote these words (Sept. 28) Brown was staying
with the Dilkes at Chichester, so that the two friends had thus narrowly
missed seeing each other once more. The ship putting to sea again, still
with adverse winds, there came next to Keats that day of momentary calm
and lightening of the spirit of which Severn has left us the record, and
the poet himself a testimony in the last and one of the most beautiful of
his sonnets. They landed on the Dorsetshire coast, apparently near
Lulworth, and spent a day exploring its rocks and caves, the beauties of
which Keats showed and interpreted with the delighted insight of one
initiated from birth into the secrets of nature. On board ship the same
night he wrote the sonnet which every reader of English knows so well;
placing it, by a pathetic choice or chance, opposite the heading a
_Lover's Complaint_, on a blank leaf of the folio copy of Shakespeare's
poems which had been given him by Reynolds, and which in marks, notes, and
under-scorings bears so many other interesting traces of his thought and
feeling:--

  "Bright star, would I were stedfast as thou art,
    Not in lone splendour hung aloft the night
  And watching, with eternal lids apart,
    Like nature's patient, sleepless Eremite,
  The moving waters at their priestlike task
    Of cold ablution round earth's human shores,
  Or gazing on the new soft-fallen mask
    Of snow upon the mountains and the moors--
  No--yet still stedfast, still unchangeable,
    Pillow'd upon my fair love's ripening breast,
  To feel for ever its soft fall and swell,
     Awake for ever in a sweet unrest,
  Still, still to hear her tender-taken breath,
    And so live ever--or else swoon to death."

These were Keats's last verses. With the single exception of the sonnet
beginning 'The day is gone, and all its sweets are gone,' composed
probably immediately after his return from Winchester, they are the only
love-verses in which his passion is attuned to tranquillity; and surely no
death-song of lover or poet came ever in a strain of more unfevered beauty
and tenderness, or with images of such a refreshing and solemn purity.

Getting clear of the Channel at last, the vessel was caught by a violent
storm in the Bay of Biscay; and Severn waking at night, and finding the
water rushing through their cabin, called out to Keats "half fearing he
might be dead," and to his relief was answered cheerfully with the first
line of Arne's long-popular song from _Artaxerxes_--'Water parted from the
sea.' As the storm abated Keats began to read the shipwreck canto of _Don
Juan_, but found its reckless and cynic brilliancy intolerable, and
presently flung the volume from him in disgust. A dead calm followed:
after which the voyage proceeded without farther incident, except the
dropping of a shot across the ship's bow by a Portuguese man-of-war, in
order to bring her to and ask a question about privateers. After a voyage
of over four weeks, the 'Maria Crowther' arrived in the Bay of Naples, and
was there subjected to ten days' quarantine; during which, says Keats, he
summoned up, 'in a kind of desperation,' more puns than in the whole
course of his life before. A Miss Cotterill, consumptive like himself, was
among his fellow-passengers, and to her Keats showed himself full of
cheerful kindness from first to last, the sight of her sufferings inwardly
preying all the while on his nerves, and contributing to aggravate his
own. He admits as much in writing from Naples harbour to Mrs Brawne: and
in the same letter says, "O what an account I could give you of the Bay of
Naples if I could once more feel myself a Citizen of this world--I feel a
spirit in my Brain would lay it forth pleasantly." The effort he
constantly made to keep bright, and to show an interest in the new world
of colour and classic beauty about him, partly imposed on Severn; but in a
letter he wrote to Brown from Naples on Nov. 1, soon after their landing,
his secret anguish of sense and spirit breaks out terribly:--

    "I can bear to die--I cannot bear to leave her.... Oh God! God! God!
    Everything I have in my trunks that reminds me of her goes through me
    like a spear. The silk lining she put in my travelling cap scalds my
    head. My imagination is horribly vivid about her--I see her--I hear
    her.... Oh Brown, I have coals of fire in my breast. It surprises me
    that the human heart is capable of so much misery."

At Naples Keats and Severn stayed at the Hotel d'Angleterre, and received
much kindness and hospitality from a brother of Miss Cotterill's who was
there to meet her. The political state and servile temper of the
people--though they were living just then under the constitutional forms
imposed on the Bourbon monarchy by the revolution of the previous
summer--grated on Keats's liberal instincts, and it was the sight, in the
theatre, of sentries actually posted on the stage during a performance
that one evening determined him suddenly to leave the place. He had
received there another letter from Shelley, who since he last wrote had
read the _Lamia_ volume, and was full of generous admiration for
_Hyperion_. Shelley now warmly renewed his invitation to Keats to come to
Pisa. But his and Severn's plans were fixed for Rome. On their drive
thither (apparently in the second week of November) Keats suffered
seriously from want of proper food: but he was able to take pleasure in
the beauty of the land, and of the autumn flowers which Severn gathered
for him by the way. Reaching Rome, they settled at once in lodgings which
Dr (afterwards Sir James) Clark had taken for them in the Piazza di
Spagna, in the first house on the right going up the steps to Sta Trinità
dei Monti. Here, according to the manner of those days in Italy, they were
left pretty much to shift for themselves. Neither could speak Italian, and
at first they were ill served by the _trattorìa_ from which they got their
meals, until Keats mended matters by one day coolly emptying all the
dishes out of window, and handing them back to the messenger; a hint, says
Severn, which was quickly taken. One of Severn's first cares was to get a
piano, since nothing soothed Keats's pain so much as music. For a while
the patient seemed better. Dr Clark wished him to avoid the excitement of
seeing the famous monuments of the city, so he left Severn to visit these
alone, and contented himself with quiet strolls, chiefly on the Pincian
close by. The season was fine, and the freshness and brightness of the
air, says Severn, invariably made him pleasant and witty. In Severn's
absence Keats had a companion he liked in an invalid Lieutenant Elton. In
their walks on the Pincian these two often met the famous beauty Pauline
Bonaparte, Princess Borghese. Her charms were by this time failing--but
not for lack of exercise; and her melting glances at his companion, who
was tall and handsome, presently affected Keats's nerves, and made them
change the direction of their walks. Sometimes, instead of walking, they
would ride a little way on horseback while Severn was working among the
ruins.

It is related by Severn that Keats in his first days at Rome began reading
a volume of Alfieri, but dropped it at the words, too sadly applicable to
himself:--

  "Misera me! sollievo a me non resta
  Altro che 'l pianto, _ed il pianto è delitto_."

Notwithstanding signs like this, his mood was on the whole more cheerful.
His thoughts even turned again towards verse, and he meditated a poem on
the subject of Sabrina. Severn began to believe he would get well, and
wrote encouragingly to his friends in England; and on Nov. 30 Keats
himself wrote to Brown in a strain much less despondent than before. But
suddenly on these glimmerings of hope followed despair. On Dec. 10 came a
relapse which left no doubt of the issue. Hæmorrhage followed hæmorrhage
on successive days, and then came a period of violent fever, with scenes
the most piteous and distressing. Keats at starting had confided to his
friend a bottle of laudanum, and now with agonies of entreaty begged to
have it, in order that he might put an end to his misery: and on Severn's
refusal, "his tender appeal turned to despair, with all the power of his
ardent imagination and bursting heart." It was no unmanly fear of pain in
Keats, Severn again and again insists, that prompted this appeal, but
above all his acute sympathetic sense of the trials which the sequel would
bring upon his friend. "He explained to me the exact procedure of his
gradual dissolution, enumerated my deprivations and toils, and dwelt upon
the danger to my life and certainly to my fortune of my continued
attendance on him." Severn gently persisting in refusal, Keats for a while
fiercely refused his friend's ministrations, until presently the example
of that friend's patience and his own better mind made him ashamed. In
religion Keats had been neither a believer nor a scoffer, respecting
Christianity without calling himself a Christian, and by turns clinging to
and drifting from the doctrine of immortality. Contrasting now the
behaviour of the believer Severn with his own, he acknowledged anew the
power of the Christian teaching and example, and bidding Severn read to
him from Jeremy Taylor's _Holy Living and Dying_, strove to pass the
remainder of his days in a temper of more peace and constancy.

By degrees the tumult of his soul abated. His sufferings were very great,
partly from the nature of the disease itself, partly from the effect of
the disastrous lowering and starving treatment at that day employed to
combat it. Shunned and neglected as the sick and their companions then
were in Italy, the friends had no succour except from the assiduous
kindness of Dr and Mrs Clark, with occasional aid from a stranger, Mr
Ewing. At one moment, their stock of money having run out, they were in
danger of actual destitution, till a remittance from Mr Taylor arrived
just in time to save them. The devotion and resource of Severn were
infinite, and had their reward. Occasionally there came times of delirium
or half-delirium, when the dying man would rave wildly of his miseries and
his ruined hopes, till his companion was almost exhausted with "beating
about in the tempest of his mind;" and once and again some fresh
remembrance of his love, or the sight of her handwriting in a letter,
would pierce him with too intolerable a pang. But generally, after the
first few weeks, he lay quiet, with his hand clasped on a white cornelian,
one of the little tokens she had given him at starting, while his
companion soothed him with reading or music. His favourite reading was
still Jeremy Taylor, and the sonatas of Haydn were the music he liked
Severn best to play to him. Of recovery he would not hear, but longed for
nothing except the peace of death, and had even weaned, or all but weaned,
himself from thoughts of fame. "I feel," he said, "the flowers growing
over me," and it seems to have been gently and without bitterness that he
gave the words for his epitaph:--"here lies one whose name was writ in
water." Ever since his first attack at Wentworth Place he had been used to
speak of himself as living a posthumous life, and now his habitual
question to the doctor when he came in was, "Doctor, when will this
posthumous life of mine come to an end?" As he turned to ask it neither
physician nor friend could bear the pathetic expression of his eyes, at
all times of extraordinary power, and now burning with a sad and piercing
unearthly brightness in his wasted cheeks. Loveable and considerate to the
last, "his generous concern for me," says Severn, "in my isolated position
at Rome was one of his greatest cares." His response to kindness was
irresistibly winning, and the spirit of poetry and pleasantness was with
him to the end. Severn tells how in watching Keats he used sometimes to
fall asleep, and awakening, find they were in the dark. "To remedy this
one night I tried the experiment of fixing a thread from the bottom of a
lighted candle to the wick of an unlighted one, that the flame might be
conducted, all which I did without telling Keats. When he awoke and found
the first candle nearly out, he was reluctant to wake me and while
doubting suddenly cried out, 'Severn, Severn, here's a little fairy
lamplighter actually lit up the other candle.'" And again "Poor Keats has
me ever by him, and shadows out the form of one solitary friend: he opens
his eyes in great doubt and horror, but when they fall on me they close
gently, open quietly and close again, till he sinks to sleep."

Such tender and harrowing memories haunted all the after life of the
watcher, and in days long subsequent it was one of his chief occupations
to write them down. Life held out for two months and a half after the
relapse, but from the first days of February the end was visibly drawing
near. It came peacefully at last. On the 23rd of that month, writes
Severn, "about four, the approaches of death came on. 'Severn--I--lift me
up--I am dying--I shall die easy; don't be frightened--be firm, and thank
God it has come.' I lifted him up in my arms. The phlegm seemed boiling in
his throat, and increased until eleven, when he gradually sank into death,
so quiet, that I still thought he slept." Three days later his body was
carried, attended by several of the English in Rome who had heard his
story, to its grave in that retired and verdant cemetery which for his
sake and Shelley's has become a place of pilgrimage to the English race
for ever. It was but the other day that the remains of Severn were laid in
their last resting-place beside his friend[73].




CHAPTER IX.

    Character and Genius.


The touching circumstances of Keats's illness and death at Rome aroused
naturally, as soon as they were known, the sympathy of every generous
mind. Foremost, as all the world knows, in the expression of that sympathy
was Shelley. He had been misinformed as to the degree in which the critics
had contributed to Keats's sufferings, and believing that they had killed
him, was full both of righteous wrath against the offenders, and of
passionate regret for what the world had lost. Under the stress of that
double inspiration Shelley wrote,--

  "And a whirlwind of music came sweet from the spheres."

As an utterance of abstract pity and indignation, _Adonaïs_ is unsurpassed
in literature: with its hurrying train of beautiful spectral images, and
the irresistible current and thrilling modulation of its verse, it is
perhaps the most perfect and sympathetic effort of Shelley's art: while
its strain of transcendental consolation for mortal loss contains the most
lucid exposition of his philosophy. But of Keats as he actually lived the
elegy presents no feature, while the general impression it conveys of his
character and fate is erroneous. A similar false impression was at the
same time conveyed, to a circle of readers incommensurably wider than
that reached by Shelley, in the well-known stanza of _Don Juan_. In regard
to Keats Byron tried both to hunt with the hounds and run with the hare.
When the _Edinburgh_ praised him, he was furious, and on receipt of the
Lamia volume wrote with vulgar savagery to Murray:--"No more Keats, I
entreat:--flay him alive;--if some of you don't, I must skin him myself."
Then after his death, hearing that it had been caused by the critics, he
turns against the latter, and cries:--"I would not be the person who wrote
that homicidal article for all the honour and glory of the world." In the
_Don Juan_ passage he contrived to have his fling at the reviewers and at
the weakness, as he imagined it, of their victim in the same breath.

Taken together with the notion of 'Johnny Keats' to which _Blackwood_ and
the _Quarterly_ had previously given currency, the _Adonaïs_ and the _Don
Juan_ passage alike tended to fix in the public mind an impression of
Keats's character as that of a weakling to whom the breath of detraction
had been poison. It was long before his friends, who knew that he was 'as
like Johnny Keats as the Holy Ghost,' did anything effectual to set his
memory right. Brown had been bent on doing so from the first, but in the
end wrote only the brief memoir, still in manuscript, which has been
quoted so often in the above pages. For anything like a full biography
George Keats in America could alone have supplied the information; but
against him, since he had failed to send help to his poet-brother in the
hour of need, (having been in truth simply unable to do so,) Brown had
unluckily conceived so harsh a prejudice that friendly communication
between them became impossible. Neither was Dilke, who alone among Keats's
friends in England took George's part, disposed under the circumstances
to help Brown in his task. For a long time George himself hoped to
superintend and supply materials for a life of his brother, but partly his
want of literary experience, and partly the difficulty of leaving his
occupations in the West, prevented him. Mr Taylor, the publisher, also at
one time wished to be Keats's biographer, and with the help of Woodhouse
collected materials for the purpose; but in the end failed to use them.
The same wish was entertained by John Hamilton Reynolds, whose literary
skill, and fine judgment and delicacy, should have made him of all the
poet's friends the most competent for the work. But of these many projects
not one had been carried out, when five-and-twenty years after Keats's
death a younger man, who had never seen him, took up the task,--the
Monckton Milnes of those days, the Lord Houghton freshly remembered by us
all,--and with help from nearly all Keats's surviving friends, and by the
grace of his own genial and sympathetic temper, set the memory of the poet
in its true light in the beautiful and moving book with which every
student is familiar.

Keats had indeed enemies within his house, apart (if the separation can
with truth be made) from the secret presence of that worst enemy of all,
inherited disease, which killed him. He had a nature all tingling with
pride and sensitiveness: he had the perilous capacity and appetite for
pleasure to which he owns when he speaks of his own 'exquisite sense of
the luxurious': and with it the besetting tendency to self-torment which
he describes as his 'horrid morbidity of temperament.' The greater his
credit that on the one hand he gave way so little to self-indulgence, and
that on the other he battled so bravely with the spirits that plagued
him. To the bridle thus put on himself he alludes in his unaffected way
when he speaks of the 'violence of his temperament, continually smothered
up.' Left fatherless at eight, motherless at fifteen, and subject, during
the forming years of his life which followed, to no other discipline but
that of apprenticeship in a suburban surgery, he showed in his life such
generosity, modesty, humour, and self-knowledge, such a spirit of conduct
and degree of self-control, as would have done honour to one infinitely
better trained and less hardly tried. His hold over himself gave way,
indeed, under the stress of passion, and as a lover he betrays all the
weak places of his nature. But we must remember his state of health when
the passion seized, and the worse state into which it quickly threw, him,
as well as the lack there was in her who caused it,--not indeed, so far as
we can judge, of kindness and loyalty, but certainly, it would seem, of
the woman's finer genius of tact and tenderness. Under another kind of
trial, when the work he offered to the world, in all soberness of
self-judgment and of hope, was thrust back upon him with gibes and insult,
he bore himself with true dignity: and if the practical consequences
preyed upon his mind, it was not more than reason and the state of his
fortunes justified.

In all ordinary relations of life, his character was conspicuous alike for
manly spirit and sweetness. No man who ever lived has inspired in his
friends a deeper or more devoted affection. One, of whose name we have
heard little in this history[74], wrote while the poet lay dying: "Keats
must get himself again, Severn, if but for me--I cannot afford to lose
him: if I know what it is to love I truly love John Keats." The following
is from a letter of Brown written also during his illness:--"he is
present to me every where and at all times,--he now seems sitting here at
my side, and looking hard into my face.... So much as I have loved him, I
never knew how closely he was wound about my heart[75]." Elsewhere,
speaking of the time of his first attack, Brown says:--"while I waited on
him his instinctive generosity, his acceptance of my offices, by a glance
of his eye, or motion of his hand, made me regard my mechanical duty as
absolutely nothing compared to his silent acknowledgment. Something like
this, Severn his last nurse, observed to me[76]:" and we know in fact how
the whole life of Severn, prolonged nearly sixty years after his friend's
death, was coloured by the light reflected from his memory. When Lord
Houghton's book came out in 1848, Archdeacon Bailey wrote from Ceylon to
thank the writer for doing merited honour to one "whose genius I did not,
and do not, more fully admire than I entirely loved the _Man_[77]." The
points on which all who knew him especially dwell are two. First his high
good sense and spirit of honour; as to which let one witness stand for
many. "He had a soul of noble integrity," says Bailey: "and his common
sense was a conspicuous part of his character. Indeed his character was,
in the best sense, manly." Next, his beautiful unselfishness and warmth of
sympathy. This is the rarest quality of genius, which from the very
intensity of its own life and occupations is apt to be self-absorbed,
requiting the devotion it receives with charm, which costs it
nothing,--but with charm only, and when the trial comes, refusing to
friendship any real sacrifice of its own objects or inclinations. But when
genius to charm adds true unselfishness, and is ready to throw all the
ardour of its own life into the cares and interests of those about it,
then we have what in human nature is most worthy of love. And this is what
his companions found in Keats. "He was the sincerest friend," cries
Reynolds, "the most loveable associate,--the deepest listener to the
griefs and distresses of all around him,--'That ever lived in this tide of
times[78].'" To the same effect Haydon:--"He was the most unselfish of
human creatures: unadapted to this world, he cared not for himself, and
put himself to any inconvenience for the sake of his friends.... He had a
kind gentle heart, and would have shared his fortune with any one who
wanted it." And again Bailey:--

    "With his friends, a sweeter tempered man I never knew, than was John
    Keats. Gentleness was indeed his proper characteristic, without one
    particle of dullness, or insipidity, or want of spirit.... In his
    letters he talks of _suspecting_ everybody. It appeared not in his
    conversation. On the contrary he was uniformly the apologist for poor
    frail human nature, and allowed for people's faults more than any man
    I ever knew, and especially for the faults of his friends. But if any
    act of wrong or oppression, of fraud or falsehood, was the topic, he
    rose into sudden and animated indignation[79]."

Lastly, "he had no fears of self," says George Keats, "through
interference in the quarrels of others, he would at all hazards, and
without calculating his powers to defend, or his reward for the deed,
defend the oppressed and distressed with heart and soul, with hand and
purse."

In this chorus of admiring affection, Haydon alone must assert his own
superiority by mixing depreciation with praise. When he laments over
Keats's dissipations, he exaggerates, there is evidence enough to show,
idly and calumniously. When on the other hand he speaks of the poet's
"want of decision of character and power of will," and says that "never
for two days did he know his own intentions," his criticism is deserving
of more attention. This is only Haydon's way of describing a fact in
Keats's nature of which no one was better aware than himself. He
acknowledges his own "unsteady and vagarish disposition." What he means is
no weakness of instinct or principle affecting the springs of conduct in
regard to others, but a liability to veerings of opinion and purpose in
regard to himself. "The Celtic instability," a reader may perhaps surmise
who adopts that hypothesis as to the poet's descent. Whether the quality
was one of race or not, it was probably inseparable from the peculiar
complexion of Keats's genius. Or rather it was an expression in character
of that which was the very essence of that genius, the predominance,
namely, of the sympathetic imagination over every other faculty. Acute as
was his own emotional life, he nevertheless belonged essentially to the
order of poets whose work is inspired, not mainly by their own
personality, but by the world of things and men outside them. He realised
clearly the nature of his own gift, and the degree to which susceptibility
to external impressions was apt to overpower in him, not practical
consistency only, but even the sense of a personal identity.

    "As to the poetic character itself," he writes, "(I mean that sort, of
    which, if I am anything, I am a member; that sort distinguished from
    the Wordsworthian, or egotistical sublime; which is a thing _per se_,
    and stands alone), it is not itself--it has no self--it is everything
    and nothing--it has no character--it enjoys light and shade--it lives
    in gusto, be it foul or fair, high or low, rich or poor, mean or
    elevated,--it has as much delight in conceiving an Iago as an Imogen.
    A poet is the most unpoetical of anything in existence, because he
    has no identity; he is continually in for, and filling, some other
    body.... If then, he has no self, and if I am a poet, where is the
    wonder that I should say I would write no more? Might I not at that
    very instant have been cogitating on the characters of Saturn and Ops?
    It is a wretched thing to confess, but it is a very fact, that not one
    word I ever utter can be taken for granted as an opinion growing out
    of my identical nature."

"Even now," he says on another occasion, "I am perhaps not speaking from
myself, but from some character in whose soul I now live." Keats was often
impatient of this Protean quality of his own mind. "I would call the head
and top of those who have a proper self," he says, "men of power": and it
is the men of power, the men of trenchant individuality and settled aims,
that in the sphere of practical life he most admires. But in the sphere of
thought and imagination his preference is dictated by the instinctive bent
of his own genius. In that sphere he is impatient, in turn, of all
intellectual narrowness, and will not allow that poetry should make itself
the exponent of any single creed or given philosophy. Thus in speaking of
what he thinks too doctrinal and pedagogic in the work of Wordsworth:--

    "For the sake," he asks, "of a few fine imaginative or domestic
    passages, are we to be bullied into a certain philosophy engendered in
    the whims of an egotist? Every man has his speculations, but every man
    does not brood and peacock over them till he makes a false coinage and
    deceives himself. Many a man can travel to the very bourne of Heaven,
    and yet want confidence to put down his half-seeing.... We hate poetry
    that has a palpable design upon us, and, if we do not agree, seems to
    put its hand into its breeches pocket. Poetry should be great and
    unobtrusive, a thing which enters into one's soul."

This is but one of many passages in which Keats proclaims the necessity,
for a poet, of an all-embracing receptivity and openness of mind. His
critics sometimes speak as if his aim had been merely to create a paradise
of art and beauty remote from the cares and interests of the world. If the
foregoing pages have been written to any purpose, the reader will be aware
that no criticism can be more mistaken. At the creation, the revelation,
of beauty Keats aimed indeed invariably, but of beauty wherever its
elements existed:--"I have loved," as he says, "the principle of beauty in
all things." His conception of the kingdom of poetry was Shaksperean,
including the whole range of life and imagination, every affection of the
soul and every speculation of the mind. Of that kingdom he lived long
enough to enter on and possess certain provinces only, those that by their
manifest and prevailing charm first and most naturally allure the spirit
of youth. Would he have been able to make the rest also his own? Would the
faculties that were so swift to reveal the hidden delights of nature, to
divine the true spirit of antiquity, to conjure with the spell of the
Middle Age,--would they with time have gained equal power to unlock the
mysteries of the heart, and, still in obedience to the law of beauty, to
illuminate and harmonize the great struggles and problems of human life?

My belief is that such power they would not have failed to gain. From the
height to which the genius of Keats arose during the brief period between
its first effervescence and its exhaustion,--from the glowing humanity of
his own nature, and the completeness with which, by the testimony alike of
his own consciousness and his friends' experience, he was accustomed to
live in the lives of others,--from the gleams of true greatness of mind
which shine not only in his poetry, but equally amid the gossip and
pleasantry of his familiar letters,--from all our evidences, in a word, as
to what he was as well as from what he did,--I think it probable that by
power, as well as by temperament and aim, he was the most Shaksperean
spirit that has lived since Shakspere; the true Marcellus, as his first
biographer has called him, of the realm of English song; and that in his
premature death our literature has sustained its greatest loss. Something
like this, it would seem, is also the opinion of his foremost now living
successors, as Lord Tennyson, Mr Browning, Mr Matthew Arnold. Others have
formed a different judgment: but among those unfortunate guests at the
banquet of life, the poets called away before their time, who can really
adjudge the honours that would have been due had they remained? In a final
estimate of any writer's work, we must take into account not what he might
have done, but only what he did. And in the work actually left by Keats,
the master-chord of humanity, we shall admit, had not yet been struck with
fulness. When we sum up in our minds the total effect of his poetry, we
can think, indeed, of the pathos of _Isabella_, but of that alone, as
equally powerful in its kind with the nature-magic of the _Hymn to Pan_
and the _Ode to a Nightingale_, with the glow of romance colour in _St
Agnes' Eve_, the weirdness of romance sentiment in _La Belle Dame Sans
Merci_, the conflict of elemental force with fate in _Hyperion_, the
revelations of the soul of ancient life and art in the _Ode on a Grecian
Urn_ and the fragment of an _Ode to Maia_.

It remains to glance at the influence exercised by Keats on the poets who
have come after him. In two ways chiefly, I should say, has that influence
been operative. First on the subject-matter of poetry, in kindling and
informing in other souls the poetic love of nature for her own sake, and
also, in equal degrees, the love both of classic fable and of romance. And
secondly on its form, in setting before poets a certain standard of
execution--a standard not of technical correctness, for which Keats never
cared sufficiently, but of that quality to which he himself refers when he
speaks of 'loading every rift of a subject with ore.' We may define it as
the endeavour after a continual positive poetic richness and felicity of
phrase. A typical instance is to be found in the lines already quoted that
tell us of the trembling hopes of Madeline,--

  "But to her heart her heart was voluble,
  Paining with eloquence her balmy side."

The beauty of such a phrase is no mere beauty of fancy or of sound; it is
the beauty which resides in truth only, every word being chosen and every
touch laid by a vital exercise of the imagination. The first line
describes in perfection the duality of consciousness in such a moment of
suspense, the second makes us realise at once the physical effect of the
emotion on the heroine, and the spell of her imagined presence on
ourselves. In so far as Keats has taught other poets really to write like
this, his influence has been wholly to their advantage,--but not so when
for this quality they give us only its simulacrum, in the shape of
brilliancies merely verbal and a glitter not of gold. The first
considerable writer among Keats's successors on whom his example took
effect was Hood, in the fairy and romance poems of his earlier time. The
dominant poet of the Victorian age, Tennyson, has been profoundly
influenced by it both in the form and the matter of his art, and is indeed
the heir of Keats and of Wordsworth in almost equal degrees. After or
together with Coleridge, Keats has also contributed most, among English
writers, to the poetic method and ideals of Rossetti and his group.
Himself, as we have seen, alike by gifts and training a true child of the
Elizabethans, he thus stands in the most direct line of descent between
the great poets of that age and those, whom posterity has yet to estimate,
of our own day.

Such, I think, is Keats's historic place in English literature. What his
place was in the hearts of those who best knew him, we have just learned
from their own lips. The days of the years of his life were few and evil,
but above his grave the double aureole of poetry and friendship shines
immortally.


THE END.




APPENDIX.


p. 2, note 1. As to the exact date of Keats's birth the evidence is
conflicting. He was christened at St Botolph's, Bishopsgate, Dec. 18,
1795, and on the margin of the entry in the baptismal register (which I am
informed is in the handwriting of the rector, Dr Conybeare) is a note
stating that he was born Oct. 31. The date is given accordingly without
question by Mr Buxton Forman (_Works_, vol. I. p. xlviii). But it seems
certain that Keats himself and his family believed his birthday to have
been Oct. 29. Writing on that day in 1818, Keats says, "this is my
birthday." Brown (in Houghton MSS.) gives the same day, but only as on
hearsay from a lady to whom Keats had mentioned it, and with a mistake as
to the year. Lastly, in the proceedings in _Rawlings v. Jennings_, Oct. 29
is again given as his birthday, in the affidavit of one Anne Birch, who
swears that she knew his father and mother intimately. The entry in the St
Botolph's register is probably the authority to be preferred.--Lower
Moorfields was the space now occupied by Finsbury Circus and the London
Institution, together with the east side of Finsbury Pavement.--The births
of the younger brothers are in my text given rightly for the first time,
from the parish registers of St Leonard's, Shoreditch; where they were all
three christened in a batch on Sept. 24, 1801. The family were at that
date living in Craven Street.


p. 2, note 2. Brown (Houghton MSS.) says simply that Thomas Keats was a
'native of Devon.' His daughter, Mrs Llanos, tells me she remembers
hearing as a child that he came from the Land's End. Persons of the name
are still living in Plymouth.


p. 5, note 2. The total amount of the funds paid into Court by the
executors under Mr Jennings's will (see Preface, p. viii) was £13160.
19_s._ 5_d._


p. 11, note 1, and p. 70, note 1. Of the total last mentioned, there came
to the widow first and last (partly by reversion from other legatees who
predeceased her) sums amounting to £9343. 2_s._ In the Chancery
proceedings the precise terms of the deed executed by Mrs Jennings for the
benefit of her grandchildren are not quoted, but only its general purport;
whence it appears that the sum she made over to Messrs Sandell and Abbey
in trust for them amounted approximately to £8000, and included all the
reversions fallen or still to fall in as above mentioned. The balance it
is to be presumed she retained for her own support (she being then 74).


p. 17, note 1. The following letter written by Mr Abbey to Mr Taylor the
publisher, under April 18, 1821, soon after the news of Keats's death
reached England, speaks for itself. The letter is from Woodhouse MSS. B.

    "Sir,

    I beg pardon for not replying to your favor of the 30th ult.
    respecting the late Mr Jno. Keats.

    I am obliged by your note, but he having withdrawn himself from my
    controul, and acted contrary to my advice, I cannot interfere with his
    affairs.

      I am, Sir,
        Yr. mo. Hble St.,
          RICHD. ABBEY."


p. 34, note 1. The difficulty of determining the exact date and place of
Keats's first introduction to Hunt arises as follows.--Cowden Clarke
states plainly and circumstantially that it took place in Leigh Hunt's
cottage at Hampstead. Hunt in his _Autobiography_ says it was 'in the
spring of the year 1816' that he went to live at Hampstead in the cottage
in question. Putting these two statements together, we get the result
stated as probable in the text. But on the other hand there is the
strongly Huntian character of Keats's _Epistle_ to G. F. Mathew, dated
November 1815, which would seem to indicate an earlier acquaintance (see
p. 31). Unluckily Leigh Hunt himself has darkened counsel on the point by
a paragraph inserted in the last edition of his _Autobiography_, as
follows:--(Pref. no. 7, p. 257) "It was not at Hampstead that I first saw
Keats. It was at York Buildings, in the New Road (No. 8), where I wrote
part of the _Indicator_, and he resided with me while in Mortimer Street,
Kentish Town (No. 13), where I concluded it. I mention this for the
curious in such things, among whom I am one." The student must not be
misled by this remark of Hunt's, which is evidently only due to a slip of
memory. It is quite true that Keats lived with Hunt in Mortimer Street,
Kentish Town, during part of July and August 1820 (see page 197): and that
before moving to that address Hunt had lived for more than a year (from
the autumn of 1818 to the spring of 1820) at 8, New Road. But that Keats
was intimate with him two years and a half earlier, when he was in fact
living not in London at all but at the Vale of Health, is abundantly
certain.


p. 37, note 1. Cowden Clarke tells how Keats once calling and finding him
fallen asleep over Chaucer, wrote on the blank space at the end of the
_Floure and the Leafe_ the sonnet beginning 'This pleasant tale is like a
little copse.' Reynolds on reading it addressed to Keats the following
sonnet of his own, which is unpublished (Houghton MSS.), and has a certain
biographical interest. It is dated Feb. 27, 1817.

  "Thy thoughts, dear Keats, are like fresh-gathered leaves,
    Or white flowers pluck'd from some sweet lily bed;
    They set the heart a-breathing, and they shed
  The glow of meadows, mornings, and spring eves,
  O'er the excited soul.--Thy genius weaves
    Songs that shall make the age be nature-led,
    And win that coronal for thy young head
  Which time's strange [qy. strong?] hand of freshness ne'er bereaves.
  Go on! and keep thee to thine own green way,
    Singing in that same key which Chaucer sung;
  Be thou companion of the summer day,
    Roaming the fields and older woods among:--
  So shall thy muse be ever in her May,
    And thy luxuriant spirit ever young."


p. 45, note 1. Woodhouse MSS. A. contains the text of the first draft in
question, with some preliminary words of Woodhouse as follows:--

"The lines at p. 36 of Keats's printed poems are altered from a copy of
verses written by K. at the request of his brother George, and by the
latter sent as a valentine to the lady. The following is a copy of the
lines as originally written:--

  Hadst thou lived in days of old,
  Oh what wonders had been told
  Of thy lively dimpled face,
  And thy footsteps full of grace:
  Of thy hair's luxurious darkling,
  Of thine eyes' expressive sparkling.
  And thy voice's swelling rapture,
  Taking hearts a ready capture.
  Oh! if thou hadst breathed then,
  Thou hadst made the Muses ten.
  Could'st thou wish for lineage higher
  Than twin sister of Thalia?
  At least for ever, ever more
  Will I call the Graces four."

Here follow lines 41--68 of the poem as afterwards published: and in
conclusion:--

  "Ah me! whither shall I flee?
  Thou hast metamorphosed me.
  Do not let me sigh and pine,
  Prythee be my valentine.
                        14 Feby. 1816."


p. 47, note 1. Mrs Procter's memory, however, betrayed her when she
informed Lord Houghton that the colour of Keats's eyes was blue. That they
were pure hazel-brown is certain, from the evidence alike of C. C. Clarke,
of George Keats and his wife (as transmitted by their daughter Mrs Speed
to her son), and from the various portraits painted from life and
posthumously by Severn and Hilton. Mrs Procter calls his hair auburn: Mrs
Speed had heard from her father and mother that it was 'golden red,' which
may mean nearly the same thing: I have seen a lock in the possession of
Sir Charles Dilke, and should rather call it a warm brown, likely to have
looked gold in the lights. Bailey in Houghton MSS. speaks of it as
extraordinarily thick and curly, and says that to lay your hand on his
head was like laying it 'on the rich plumage of a bird.' An evidently
misleading description of Keats's general aspect is that of Coleridge when
he describes him as a 'loose, slack, not well-dressed youth.' The sage
must have been drawing from his inward eye: those intimate with Keats
being of one accord as to his appearance of trim strength and 'fine
compactness of person.' Coleridge's further mention of his hand as
shrunken and old-looking seems exact.


p. 78, note 1. The isolated expressions of Keats on this subject, which
alone have been hitherto published, have exposed him somewhat unjustly to
the charge of petulance and morbid suspicion. Fairness seems to require
that the whole passage in which he deals with it should be given. The
passage occurs in a letter to Bailey written from Hampstead and dated
Oct. 8, 1817, of which only a fragment was printed by Lord Houghton, and
after him by Mr Buxton Forman (_Works_, vol. III. p. 82, no. xvi.).

"I went to Hunt's and Haydon's who live now neighbours.--Shelley was
there--I know nothing about anything in this part of the world--every Body
seems at Loggerheads. There's Hunt infatuated--there's Haydon's picture in
statu quo--There's Hunt walks up and down his painting-room criticizing
every head most unmercifully--There's Horace Smith tired of Hunt--'The Web
of our life is of mingled yarn.'... I am quite disgusted with literary
men, and will never know another except Wordsworth--no not even Byron.
Here is an instance of the friendship of such. Haydon and Hunt have known
each other many years--now they live, pour ainsi dire, jealous neighbours.
Haydon says to me, Keats, don't show your lines to Hunt on any account, or
he will have done half for you--so it appears Hunt wishes it to be
thought. When he met Reynolds in the Theatre, John told him I was getting
on to the completion of 4000 lines--Ah! says Hunt, had it not been for me
they would have been 7000! If he will say this to Reynolds, what would he
to other people? Haydon received a Letter a little while back on the
subject from some Lady, which contains a caution to me, thro' him, on this
subject. Now is not all this a most paultry thing to think about?"


p. 83, note 1. See Haydon, _Autobiography_, vol. I. pp. 384-5. The letter
containing Keats's account of the same entertainment was printed for the
first time by Speed, _Works_, vol. I. p. i. no. 1, where it is dated
merely 'Featherstone Buildings, Monday.' (At Featherstone Buildings lived
the family of Charles Wells.) In Houghton MSS. I find a transcript of the
same letter in the hand of Mr Coventry Patmore, with a note in Lord
Houghton's hand: "These letters I did not print. R. M. M." In the
transcript is added in a parenthesis after the weekday the date 5 April,
1818: but this is a mistake; the 5th of April in that year was not a
Monday: and the contents of Keats's letter itself, as well as a comparison
with Haydon's words in his _Autobiography_, prove beyond question that it
was written on Monday, the 5th of January.


p. 87, note 1. Similar expressions about the Devonshire weather occur in
nearly all Keats's letters written thence in the course of March and
April. The letter to Bailey containing the sentences quoted in my text is
wrongly printed both by Lord Houghton and Mr Forman under date Sept.
1818. I find the same date given between brackets at the head of the same
letter as transcribed in Woodhouse MSS. B., proving that an error was
early made either in docketing or copying it. The contents of the letter
leave no doubt as to its real date. The sentences quoted prove it to have
been written not in autumn but in spring. It contains Keats's reasons both
for going down to join his brother Tom at Teignmouth, and for failing to
visit Bailey at Oxford on the way: now in September Keats was not at
Teignmouth at all, and Bailey had left Oxford for good, and was living at
his curacy in Cumberland (see p. 122). Moreover there is an allusion by
Keats himself to this letter in another which he wrote the next day to
Reynolds, whereby its true date can be fixed with precision as Friday,
March 13.


p. 112, note 1. The following unpublished letter of Keats to Mr Taylor
(from Woodhouse MSS. B.) has a certain interest, both in itself and as
fixing the date of his departure for the North:--

    "Sunday evening,

    "My dear Taylor,

    I am sorry I have not had time to call and wish you health till my
    return. Really I have been hard run these last three days. However, au
    revoir, God keep us all well! I start tomorrow Morning. My brother Tom
    will I am afraid be lonely. I can scarcely ask the loan of books for
    him, since I still keep those you lent me a year ago. If I am
    overweening, you will I know be indulgent. Therefore when you shall
    write, do send him some you think will be most amusing--he will be
    careful in returning them. Let him have one of my books bound. I am
    ashamed to catalogue these messages. There is but one more, which
    ought to go for nothing as there is a lady concerned. I promised Mrs
    Reynolds one of my books bound. As I cannot write in it let the
    opposite" [a leaf with the name and 'from the author,' notes
    Woodhouse] "be pasted in 'prythee. Remember me to Percy St.--Tell
    Hilton that one gratification on my return will be to find him engaged
    on a history piece to his own content. And tell Dewint I shall become
    a disputant on the landscape. Bow for me very genteely to Mrs D. or
    she will not admit your diploma. Remember me to Hessey, saying I hope
    he'll _Carey_ his point. I would not forget Woodhouse. Adieu!

      Your sincere friend,
        JOHN O'GROTS.

    June 22, 1818. Hampstead" [The date and place are added by Woodhouse
    in red ink, presumably from the post-mark].


p. 120, note 1. In the concluding lines quoted in my text, Mr Buxton
Forman has noticed the failure of rhyme between 'All the magic of the
place' and the next line, 'So saying, with a spirit's glance,' and has
proposed, by way of improvement, to read 'with a spirit's grace'. I find
the true explanation in Woodhouse MSS. A., where the poem is continued
thus in pencil after the word 'place'.

  "'Tis now free to stupid face,
  To cutters, and to fashion boats,
  To cravats and to petticoats:--
  The great sea shall war it down,
  For its fame shall not be blown
  At each farthing Quadrille dance.
  So saying with a spirit's glance
  He dived"--.

Evidently Keats was dissatisfied with the first six of these lines (as he
well might be), and suppressed them in copying the piece both for his
correspondents and for the press: forgetting at the same time to give any
indication of the hiatus so caused.


p. 128, note 1. Lord Houghton says, "On returning to the south, Keats
found his brother alarmingly ill, and immediately joined him at
Teignmouth." It is certain that no such second visit to Teignmouth was
made by either brother. The error is doubtless due to the misdating of
Keats's March letter to Bailey: see last note but two, p. 225.


p. 138, note 1. Keats in this letter proves how imperfect was his
knowledge of his own affairs, and how much those affairs had been
mismanaged. At the time when he thus found himself near the end of the
capital on which he had hitherto subsisted, there was another resource at
his disposal of which it is evident he knew nothing. Quite apart from the
provision made by Mrs Jennings for her grandchildren after her husband's
death, and administered by Mr Abbey, there were the legacies Mr Jennings
himself had left them by will; one of £1000 direct; the other, of a
capital to yield £50 a year, in reversion after their mother's death (see
p. 5). The former sum was invested by order of the Court in Consols, and
brought £1550. 7_s._ 10_d._ worth of that security at the price at which
it then stood. £1666. 13_s_. 4_d._ worth of the same stock was farther
purchased from the funds of the estate in order to yield the income of £50
a year. The interest on both these investments was duly paid to Frances
Rawlings during her life: but after her death in 1810 both investments
lay untouched and accumulating interest until 1823; when George Keats, to
whose knowledge their existence seems then to have been brought for the
first time, received on application to the Court a fourth share of each,
with its accumulations. Two years afterwards Fanny Keats received in like
manner on application the remaining three shares (those of her brothers
John and Tom as well as her own), the total amount paid to her being
£3375. 5_s._ 7_d._, and to George £1147. 5_s._ 1_d._ It was a part of the
ill luck which attended the poet always that the very existence of these
funds must have been ignored or forgotten by his guardian and solicitors
at the time when he most needed them.


p. 148, note 1. Landor's letter to Lord Houghton on receipt of a
presentation copy of the _Life and Letters_, in 1848, begins
characteristically as follows:--

    "Bath, Aug. 29.

    Dear Milnes,

    On my return to Bath last evening, after six weeks' absence, I find
    your valuable present of Keatses Works. He better deserves such an
    editor than I such a mark of your kindness. Of all our poets,
    excepting Shakspeare and Milton, and perhaps Chaucer, he has most of
    the poetical character--fire, fancy, and diversity. He has not indeed
    overcome so great a difficulty as Shelley in his _Cenci_, nor united
    so many powers of the mind as Southey in _Kehama_--but there is an
    effluence of power and light pervading all his work, and a freshness
    such as we feel in the glorious dawn of Chaucer.--"


p. 152, note 1. I think there is no doubt that _Hyperion_ was begun by
Keats beside his brother's sickbed in September or October 1818, and that
it is to it he alludes when he speaks in those days of 'plunging into
abstract images,' and finding a 'feverous relief' in the 'abstractions' of
poetry. Certainly these phrases could hardly apply to so slight a task as
the translation of Ronsard's sonnet, _Nature ornant Cassandre_, which is
the only specific piece of work he about the same time mentions. Brown
says distinctly, of the weeks when Keats was first living with him after
Tom's death in December--"It was then he wrote _Hyperion_"; but these
words rather favour than exclude the supposition that it had been already
begun. In his December-January letter to America Keats himself alludes to
the poem by name, and says he has been 'going on a little' with it: and on
the 14th of February, 1819, says 'I have not gone on with _Hyperion_.'
During the next three months he was chiefly occupied on the _Odes_, and
whether he at the same time wrote any more of _Hyperion_ we cannot tell.
It was certainly finished, all but the revision, by some time in April, as
in that month Woodhouse had the MS. to read, and notes (see Buxton Forman,
_Works_, vol. II. p. 143) that "it contains 2 books and 1/2--(about 900
lines in all):" the actual length of the piece as published being 883
lines and a word, and that of the draft copied by Woodhouse before
revision 891 and a word (see below, note to p. 164). When Keats, after
nearly a year's interruption of his correspondence with Bailey, tells him
in a letter from Winchester in August or September, "I have also been
writing parts of my _Hyperion_," this must not be taken as meaning that he
has been writing them lately, but only that he has been writing
them,--like _Isabella_ and the _Eve of St Agnes_, which he mentions at the
same time,--since the date of his last letter.


p. 164, note 1. The version of _The Eve of St Agnes_ given in Woodhouse
MSS. A. is copied almost without change from the corrected state of the
original MS. in the possession of Mr F. Locker-Lampson; which is in all
probability that actually written by Keats at Chichester (see p. 133). The
readings of the MS. in question are given with great care by Mr Buxton
Forman (_Works_, vol. II. p. 71 foll.), but the first seven stanzas of the
poem as printed are wanting in it. Students may therefore be glad to have,
from Woodhouse's transcript, the following table of the changes in those
stanzas made by the poet in the course of composition:--

Stanza I.: line 1, for "chill" stood "cold": line 4, for "was" stood
"were": line 7, for "from" stood "in": line 9 (and Stanza II., line 1),
for "prayer" stood "prayers". Stanza III.: line 7, for "went" stood
"turn'd": line 8, for "Rough" stood "Black". After stanza III. stood the
following stanza, suppressed in the poem as printed.

  4.

      But there are ears may hear sweet melodies,
      And there are eyes to brighten festivals,
      And there are feet for nimble minstrelsies,
      And many a lip that for the red wine calls--
      Follow, then follow to the illumined halls,
      Follow me youth--and leave the eremite--
      Give him a tear--then trophied bannerals
      And many a brilliant tasseling of light
  Shall droop from arched ways this high baronial night.

Stanza V.; line 1, for "revelry" stood "revellers": lines 3-5, for--

  "Numerous as shadows haunting fairily
  The brain new-stuff'd in youth with triumphs gay
  Of old romance. These let us wish away,"--

stood the following:--

  "Ah what are they? the idle pulse scarce stirs,
  The muse should never make the spirit gay;
  Away, bright dulness, laughing fools away."


p. 166, note 1. At what precise date _La Belle Dame Sans Merci_ was
written is uncertain. As of the _Ode to Melancholy_, Keats makes no
mention of this poem in his correspondence. In Woodhouse MSS. A. it is
dated 1819. That Woodhouse made his transcripts before or while Keats was
on his Shanklin-Winchester expedition in that year, is I think certain
both from the readings of the transcripts themselves, and from the absence
among them of _Lamia_ and the _Ode to Autumn_. Hence it is to the first
half of 1819 that _La Belle Dame Sans Merci_ must belong, like so much of
the poet's best work besides. The line quoted in my text shows that the
theme was already in his mind when he composed the _Eve of St Agnes_ in
January. Mr Buxton Forman is certainly mistaken in supposing it to have
been written a year later, after his critical attack of illness (_Works_,
vol. II. p. 357, note).


p. 186, note 1. The relation of _Hyperion, A Vision_, to the original
_Hyperion_ is a vital point in the history of Keats's mind and art, and
one that has been generally misunderstood. The growth of the error is
somewhat interesting to trace. The first mention of the _Vision_ is in
Lord Houghton's _Life and Letters_, ed. 1848, Vol. I. p. 244. Having then
doubtless freshly in his mind the passage of Brown's MS. memoir quoted in
the text, Lord Houghton stated the matter rightly in the words following
his account of _Hyperion_:--"He afterwards published it as a fragment, and
still later re-cast it into the shape of a Vision, which remains equally
unfinished." When eight years later the same editor printed the piece for
the first time (in _Miscellanies of the Philobiblon Society_, Vol. III.
1856-7) from the MS. given him by Brown, he must have forgotten Brown's
account of its origin, and writes doubtfully: "Is it the original sketch
out of which the earlier part of the poem was composed, or is it the
commencement of a reconstruction of the whole? I have no external evidence
to decide this question:" and further,--"the problem of the priority of
the two poems--both fragments, and both so beautiful--may afford a wide
field for ingenious and critical conjecture." Ten years later again, when
he brought out the second edition of the _Life and Letters_, Lord Houghton
had drifted definitely into a wrong conclusion on the point, and printing
the piece in his Appendix as 'Another Version,' says in his text (p. 206)
"on reconsideration, I have no doubt that it was the first draft."
Accordingly it is given as 'an earlier version' in Mr W. M. Rossetti's
edition of 1872, as 'the first version' in Lord Houghton's own edition of
1876; and so on, positively but quite wrongly, in the several editions by
Messrs Buxton Forman, Speed, and W. T. Arnold. The obvious superiority of
_Hyperion_ to the _Vision_ no doubt at first sight suggested the
conclusion to which these editors, following Lord Houghton, had come. In
the mean time at least two good critics, Mr W. B. Scott and Mr. R.
Garnett, had always held on internal evidence that the _Vision_ was not a
first draft, but a recast attempted by the poet in the decline of his
powers: an opinion in which Mr Garnett was confirmed by his recollection
of a statement to that effect in the lost MS. of Woodhouse (see above,
Preface, p. v, and W. T. Arnold, _Works_ &c. p. xlix, note). Brown's
words, quoted in my text, leave no doubt whatever that these gentlemen
were right. They are confirmed from another side by Woodhouse MSS. A,
which contains the copy of a real early draft of _Hyperion_. In this copy
the omissions and alterations made in revising the piece are all marked in
pencil, and are as follows, (taking the number of lines in the several
books of the poem as printed).

BOOK I. After line 21 stood the cancelled lines--

  "Thus the old Eagle, drowsy with great grief,
  Sat moulting his weak plumage, never more
  To be restored or soar against the sun;
  While his three sons upon Olympus stood."

In line 30, for "stay'd Ixion's wheel" stood "eased Ixion's toil". In line
48, for "tone" stood "tune". In line 76, for "gradual" stood "sudden". In
line 102, after the word "Saturn," stood the cancelled words--

                "What dost think?
  Am I that same? O Chaos!"

In line 156, for "yielded like the mist" stood "gave to them like mist."
In line 189, for "Savour of poisonous brass" stood "A poison-feel of
brass." In line 200 for "When earthquakes jar their battlements and
towers" stood "When an earthquake hath shook their city towers." After
line 205 stood the cancelled line "Most like a rose-bud to a fairy's
lute." In line 209, for "And like a rose" stood "Yes, like a rose." In
line 268, for "Suddenly" stood "And, sudden."

BOOK II. In line 128, for "vibrating" stood "vibrated." In line 134 for
"starry Uranus" stood "starr'd Uranus" (some friend doubtless called
Keats's attention to the false quantity).

BOOK III. After line 125 stood the cancelled lines:--

  "Into a hue more roseate than sweet pain
  Gives to a ravish'd nymph, when her warm tears
  Gush luscious with no sob; or more severe."

In line 126, for "most like" stood "more like."

In these omissions and corrections, two things will be apparent to the
student: first, that they are all greatly for the better; and second, that
where a corrected passage occurs again in the _Vision_, it in every case
corresponds to the printed _Hyperion_, and not to the draft of the poem
preserved by Woodhouse. This of itself would make it certain that the
_Vision_ was not a first version of _Hyperion_, but a recast of the poem
as revised (in all probability at Winchester) after its first composition.
Taken together with the statement of Brown, which is perfectly explicit as
to time, place, and circumstances, and the corresponding statement of
Woodhouse as recollected by Mr Garnett, the proof is from all sides
absolute: and the 'first version' theory must disappear henceforward from
editions of and commentaries on our poet.


p. 193, note 2. A more explicit refutation of Haydon's account was given,
some years after its appearance, by Cowden Clarke (see Preface, no. 10),
not, indeed, from personal observation at the time in question, but from
general knowledge of the poet's character:--

"I can scarcely conceive of anything more unjust than the account which
that ill-ordered being, Haydon, the artist, left behind him in his 'Diary'
respecting the idolised object of his former intimacy, John Keats" ...
"Haydon's detraction was the more odious because its object could not
contradict the charge, and because it supplied his old critical
antagonists (if any remained) with an authority for their charge against
him of Cockney ostentation and display. The most mean-spirited and
trumpery twaddle in the paragraph was, that Keats was so far gone in
sensual excitement as to put cayenne pepper on his tongue when taking his
claret. In the first place, if the stupid trick were ever played, I have
not the slightest belief in its serious sincerity. During my knowledge of
him Keats never purchased a bottle of claret; and from such observation as
could not escape me, I am bound to say that his domestic expenses never
would have occasioned him a regret or a self-reproof; and, lastly, I never
perceived in him even a tendency to imprudent indulgence."


p. 198, note 1. In Medwin's _Life of Shelley_ (1847), pp. 89-92, are some
notices of Keats communicated to the writer by Fanny Brawne (then Mrs
Lindon), to whom Medwin alludes as his 'kind correspondent.' Medwin's
carelessness of statement and workmanship is well known: he is perfectly
casual in the use of quotation marks and the like: but I think an
attentive reading of the paragraph, beginning on p. 91, which discusses Mr
Finch's account of Keats's death, leaves no doubt that it continues in
substance the quotation previously begun from Mrs Lindon. "That his
sensibility," so runs the text, "was most acute, is true, and his passions
were very strong, but not violent; if by that term, violence of temper is
implied. His was no doubt susceptible, but his anger seemed rather to turn
on himself than others, and in moments of greatest irritation, it was only
by a sort of savage despondency that he sometimes grieved and wounded his
friends. Violence such as the letter" [of Mr Finch] "describes, was quite
foreign to his nature. For more than a twelvemonth before quitting
England, I saw him every day", [this would be true of Fanny Brawne from
Oct. 1819 to Sept. 1820, if we except the Kentish Town period in the
summer, and is certainly more nearly true of her than of anyone else,] "I
often witnessed his sufferings, both mental and bodily, and I do not
hesitate to say, that he never could have addressed an unkind expression,
much less a violent one, to any human being." The above passage has been
overlooked by critics of Keats, and I am glad to bring it forward, as
serving to show a truer and kinder appreciation of the poet by the woman
he loved than might be gathered from her phrase in the letter to Dilke so
often quoted.




INDEX.


  Abbey, Mr Richard, 11, 17, 70, 77, 138, 144, 192.

  _Adonaïs_ (Shelley's), 209, 210.

  _Adventures of a younger Son_ (Trelawney's), 75.

  Alfieri, 205.

  _Alfred, The_, 124.

  _Anatomy of Melancholy_ (Burton's), 167.

  _Antiquary_ (Scott's), 115.

  _Apollo, Ode to_, 21-22.

  _Autumn, Ode to_, 177.


  Bailey, Benjamin, 75, 76, 77, 122, 213, 214.

  Beattie, 21.

  _Biographia Literaria_ (Coleridge's), 64.

  Boccaccio, 148.

  Bonaparte, Pauline, Princess Borghese, 204.

  Brawne, Miss Fanny, 131 seq., 180-181, 197, 198.

  _Britannia's Pastorals_ (Browne's), 31.

  Brown, Charles, 13, 73, 111 seq., 128, 143 seq., 181, 200, 210.

  Browne, 31.

  Browning, Robert, 218.

  Burnet, 10.

  Byron, 1, 19, 65, 210;
    Sonnet to, 22.


  Canterbury, 71.

  _Cap and Bells_, 183 seq.

  Castlereagh, 25.

  _Champion, The_, 82.

  Chatterton, 157, 158;
    Sonnet to, 22.

  Chaucer, 28.

  Chichester, 133.

  Clarke, Cowden, 3, 8, 12, 22, 23, 72, 84.

  Clarke, Rev. John, 4.

  'Cockaigne, King of,' 121.

  _Cockney School of Poetry_ (Articles in _Blackwood's Magazine_), 77,
        121 seq.

  Coleridge, 16, 25, 26, 33, 64.

  Cooper, Astley, 18.

  Cotterill, Miss, 202, 203.

  Cox, Miss Charlotte, 130.


  _Dante_ (Cary's), 113.

  _Death_, Stanzas on, 21;
    Keats' contemplation of, 140;
    longing for, 200.

  De Quincey, 26.

  Devonshire, 87.

  _Dictionary_ (Lempriere's), 10.

  Dilke, 73, 210.

  Dilke, Charles Wentworth, 73, 128, 135.

  _Don Juan_ (Byron's), 184, 202, 210.

  Dryden, 29, 30, 53.


  Edmonton, 5, 6, 11, 14, 20.

  Eldon, 25.

  Elton, Lieutenant, 204.

  Emancipation, Literary, 63-64.

  _Endymion_, 66, 68, 71, 76, 80, 83, 86, 91;
    Keats' low opinion of the poem, 91;
    its beauties and defects, 91, 106-109;
    Drayton's and Fletcher's previous treatment of the subject, 94-95;
    Keats' unclassical manner of treatment, 96;
    its one bare circumstance, 87;
    scenery of the poem, 97;
    its quality of nature-interpretation, 98;
    its love passages, 100;
    comparison of description with a similar one in _Richard III._, 103;
    its lyrics, 104-106;
    appreciation of the lyrics a test of true relish for poetry, 106;
    its rhythm and music, 109;
    Keats' own preface the best criticism of the poem, 110.

  Enfield, 4, 12.

  _Epistles_, their tributes to the conjoined pleasures of literature and
        friendship, 53;
    ungrammatical slips in, 54;
    characteristic specimens of, 54-55.

  _Epithalamium_ (Spenser's), 12.

  _Eve of St Agnes_, its simple theme, 160;
    its ease and directness of construction, 161;
    its unique charm, 163.

  _Eve of St Mark_, contains Keats' impressions of three Cathedral towns,
        164;
    its pictures, 164;
    the legend, 164;
    its pictorial brilliance, 165;
    its influence on later English poetry, 165.

  _Examiner, The_ (Leigh Hunt's), 25.


  _Faerie Queene_ (Spenser's), 12, 13, 35.

  _Faithful Shepherdess_ (Fletcher's), 95.

  _Fanny, Lines to_, 134.

  _Feast of the Poets_ (Leigh Hunt's), 32.

  Fletcher, 95.

  _Foliage_ (Leigh Hunt's), 73.


  Genius, births of, 1.

  _Gisborne, Letter to Maria_ (Shelley's), 30.

  Goethe, 154.

  _Grasshopper and Cricket_, 35.

  Gray, 113.

  Greece, Keats' love of, 58, 77, 154.

  _Guy Mannering_ (Scott's), 115.


  Hammond, Mr, 11, 14.

  Hampstead, 72, 77.

  Haslam, William, 45, 212 (note).

  Haydon, 3, 40, 65, 68, 78, 137, 138, 191, 214.

  Hazlitt, William, 83, 84.

  _History of his own Time_ (Burnet's), 10.

  Holmes, Edward, 8.

  _Holy Living and Dying_ (Jeremy Taylor's), 206.

  _Homer, On first looking into Chapman's_ (Sonnet), 23-24.

  Hood, 219.

  _Hope_, address to, 21.

  Horne, R. H., 11.

  Houghton, Lord, 75, 211-213.

  Hunt, John, 25.

  Hunt, Leigh, 22, 24, 25, 32, 35, 39, 49, 51, 68, 72, 78, 196.

  _Hyperion_, 129, 133, 144;
    its purpose, 152;
    one of the grandest poems of our language, 157;
    the influences of _Paradise Lost_ on it, 158;
    its blank verse compared with Milton's, 158;
    its elemental grandeur, 160;
    remodelling of it, 185 seq.;
    description of the changes, 186-187;
    special interest of the poem, 187.


  _Imitation of Spenser_ (Keats' first lines), 14, 20.

  _Indolence, Ode on_, 174-175.

  _Isabella, or the Pot of Basil_, 86;
    source of its inspiration, 148;
    minor blemishes, 149;
    its Italian metre, 149;
    its conspicuous power and charm, 149;
    description of its beauties, 151.

  Isle of Wight, 67.


  Jennings, Mrs, 5, 11.

  Jennings, Capt. M. J., 7.

  Joseph and his Brethren (Wells'), 45.


  Kean, 81.

  Keats, John, various descriptions of, 7, 8, 9, 46, 47, 76, 136, 224;
    birth, 2;
    education at Enfield, 4;
    death of his father, 5;
    school-life, 5-9;
    his studious inclinations, 10;
    death of his mother, 10;
    leaves school at the age of fifteen, 11;
    is apprenticed to a surgeon, 11;
    finishes his school-translation of the _Æneid_, 12;
    reads Spenser's _Epithalamium_ and _Faerie Queene_, 12;
    his first attempts at composition, 13;
    goes to London and walks the hospitals, 14;
    his growing passion for poetry, 15;
    appointed dresser at Guy's Hospital, 16;
    his last operation, 16;
    his early life in London, 18;
    his early poems, 20 seq.;
    his introduction to Leigh Hunt, 24;
    Hunt's great influence over him, 26 seq.;
    his acquaintance with Shelley, 38;
    his other friends, 40-45;
    personal characteristics, 47-48;
    goes to live with his brothers in the Poultry, 48;
    publication of his first volume of poems, 65;
    retires to the Isle of Wight, 66;
    lives at Carisbrooke, 67;
    changes to Margate, 68;
    money troubles, 70;
    spends some time at Canterbury, 71;
    receives first payment in advance for _Endymion_, 71;
    lives with his two brothers at Hampstead, 71;
    works steadily at _Endymion_, 71-72;
    makes more friends, 73;
    writes part of _Endymion_ at Oxford, 76;
    his love for his sister Fanny, 77;
    stays at Burford Bridge, 80;
    goes to the 'immortal dinner,' 82;
    he visits Devonshire, 87;
    goes on a walking tour in Scotland with Charles Brown, 113;
    crosses over to Ireland, 116;
    returns to Scotland and visits Burns' country, 118;
    sows there the seeds of consumption, 120;
    returns to London, 120;
    is attacked in _Blackwood's Magazine_ and the _Quarterly Review_, 121;
    Lockhart's conduct towards him, 122;
    death of his young brother Tom, 128;
    goes to live with Charles Brown, 128;
    falls in love, 130-131;
    visits friends in Chichester, 133;
    suffers with his throat, 133;
    his correspondence with his brother George, 139;
    goes to Shanklin, 143;
    collaborates with Brown in writing _Otho_, 143;
    goes to Winchester, 144;
    returns again to London, 146;
    more money troubles, 146;
    determines to make a living by journalism, 146;
    lives by himself, 146;
    goes back to Mr Brown, 181;
    _Otho_ is returned unopened after having been accepted, 182;
    want of means prevents his marriage, 190;
    his increasing illness, 191 seq.;
    temporary improvement in his health, 194;
    publishes another volume of poems, 196;
    stays with Leigh Hunt's family, 197;
    favourable notice in the _Edinburgh Review_, 197;
    lives with the family of Miss Brawne, 198;
    goes with Severn to spend the winter in Italy, 199;
    the journey improves his health, 200;
    writes his last lines, 201;
    stays for a time at Naples, 203;
    goes on to Rome, 203-204;
    further improvement in his health, 205;
    sudden and last relapse, 205;
    he is tenderly nursed by his friend Severn, 206;
    speaks of himself as already living a 'posthumous life,' 207;
    grows worse and dies, 208;
    various tributes to his memory, 214.

    His genius awakened by the _Faerie Queene_, 13;
    influence of other poets on him, 21;
    experiments in language, 21, 64, 147, 169;
    employment of the 'Heroic' couplet, 27, 30;
    element and spirit of his own poetry, 50;
    experiments in metre, 52;
    studied musical effect of his verse, 55;
    his Grecian spirit, 58, 77, 95, 114, 154;
    view of the aims and principles of poetry, 61;
    imaginary dependence on Shakspere, 69;
    thoughts on the mystery of Evil, 88;
    puns, 72, 202;
    his poems Greek in idea, English in manner, 96;
    his poetry a true spontaneous expression of his mind, 110;
    power of vivifying, 161;
    verbal licenses, 169;
    influence on subsequent poets, 218;
    felicity of phrase, 219.

    Personal characteristics:
      Celtic temperament, 3, 58, 70;
      affectionate nature, 6, 7, 9, 10, 77;
      morbid temperament, 6, 70, 211;
      lovable disposition, 6, 8, 19, 212, 213;
      temper, 7, 9, 233;
      personal beauty, 8;
      _penchant_ for fighting, 8, 9, 72;
      studious nature, 9, 112;
      humanity, 39, 89, 114-115;
      sympathy and tenderness, 47, 213;
      eyes, description of, 46, 207, 224;
      love of nature, 47, 55-56;
      voice, 47;
      desire of fame, 60, 125, 141, 207;
      natural sensibility to physical and spiritual spell of moonlight, 95;
      highmindedness, 125-126;
      love romances, 127, 130-134, 180-181, 197, 200, 203, 212;
      pride and sensitiveness, 211;
      unselfishness, 213, 214;
      instability, 215.

    Various descriptions of, 7, 8, 9, 46, 47, 76, 136, 224.

  Keats, Admiral Sir Richard, 7.

  Keats, Fanny (Mrs Llanos), 77.

  Keats, Mrs (Keats' mother), 5, 10.

  Keats, George, 90, 113, 192, 193, 210.

  Keats, Thomas (Keats' father), 2, 5.

  Keats, Tom, 6, 127.

  _King Stephen_, 179.

  'Kirk-men,' 116-117.


  _La Belle Dame sans Merci_, 165, 166, 218;
    origin of the title, 165;
    a story of the wasting power of love, 166;
    description of its beauties, 166.

  Lamb, Charles, 26, 82, 83.

  _Lamia_, 143;
    its source, 167;
    versification, 167;
    the picture of the serpent woman, 168;
    Keats' opinion of the Poem, 168.

  Landor, 75.

  _Laon and Cythna_, 76.

  Letters, extracts, etc., from Keats', 66, 67, 68, 69, 77, 78, 79, 81,
        85, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 114, 116-117, 118, 126, 127, 129, 130,
        134, 137, 139, 141, 145, 146, 157, 181, 182, 190, 194-195, 200,
        203, 226.

  'Little Keats,' 19.

  Lockhart, 33, 122, 123.

  _London Magazine_, 71.


  Mackereth, George Wilson, 18.

  Madeline, 162 seq.

  'Maiden-Thought,' 88, 114.

  _Man about Town_ (Webb's), 38.

  _Man in the Moon_ (Drayton's), 93.

  Margate, 68.

  Mathew, George Felton, 19.

  Meg Merrilies, 115-116.

  _Melancholy, Ode on_, 175.

  Milton, 51, 52, 54, 88.

  Monckton, Milnes, 211.

  Moore, 65.

  _Morning Chronicle, The_, 124.

  _Mother Hubbard's Tale_ (Spenser's), 31.

  Mythology, Greek, 10, 58, 152, 153.


  Naples, 203.

  _Narensky_ (Brown's), 74.

  Newmarch, 19.

  _Nightingale, Ode to a_, 136, 175, 218.

  _Nymphs_, 73.


  Odes, 21, 137, 145, 170-171, 172, 174, 175, 177, 218.

  _Orion_, 11.

  _Otho_, 143, 144, 180, 181.

  Oxford, 75, 77.

  _Oxford Herald, The_, 122.


  _Pan, Hymn to_, 83.

  _Pantheon_ (Tooke's), 10.

  _Paradise Lost_, 88, 152, 154, 158.

  Patriotism, 115.

  _Peter Corcoran_ (Reynolds'), 36.

  Plays, 178, 179, 181, 182.

  Poems (Keats' first volume), faint echoes of other poets in them, 51;
    their form, 52;
    their experiments in metre, 52;
    merely poetic preludes, 53;
    their rambling tendency, 53;
    immaturity, 60;
    attractiveness, 61;
    characteristic extracts, 63;
    their moderate success, 65-66.

  Poetic Art, Theory and Practice, 61, 64.

  Poetry, joys of, 55;
    principle and aims of, 61;
    genius of, 110.

  _Polymetis_ (Spence's), 10.

  Pope, 19, 29, 30.

  'Posthumous Life,' 207.

  Prince Regent, 25.

  Proctor, Mrs, 47.

  _Psyche, Ode to_, 136, 171, 172.

  _Psyche_ (Mrs Tighe's), 21.


  Quarterly Review, 121, 124.


  _Rainbow_ (Campbell's), 170.

  Rawlings, William, 5.

  Reynolds, John Hamilton, 36, 211, 214.

  Rice, James, 37, 142.

  _Rimini, Story of_, 27, 30, 31, 35.

  Ritchie, 82.

  Rome, 204.

  Rossetti, 220.


  _Safie_ (Reynolds'), 36.

  Scott, Sir Walter, 1, 33, 65, 115, 123, 124.

  Scott, John, 124.

  Sculpture, ancient, 136.

  _Sea-Sonnet_, 67.

  Severn, Joseph, 45, 72, 135, 191, 199 seq.

  Shakspere, 67, 69.

  Shanklin, 67, 143.

  Shelley, 16, 32, 38, 56, 85, 110, 199, 203, 209.

  Shenstone, 21.

  _Sleep and Poetry_, 52, 60, 61, 109.

  Smith, Horace, 33, 81.

  Sonnets, 22, 23, 43, 48, 49, 57, 201.

  _Specimen of an Induction to a Poem_, 52.

  Spenser, 19, 20, 21, 31, 35, 54, 55.

  Stephens, Henry, 18-20.

  Surrey Institution, 84.


  Taylor, Mr, 71, 81, 126, 144, 146, 206, 211.

  Teignmouth, 87.

  Tennyson, 218.

  Thomson, 21.


  _Urn, Ode on a Grecian_, 136, 172-174.


  _Vision, The_, 187, 193 (_see_ Hyperion).


  Webb, Cornelius, 38.

  Wells, Charles, 45.

  Wilson, 33.

  Winchester, 143-145.

  Windermere, 113, 114.

  Wordsworth, 1, 44, 46, 56, 64, 82, 83, 158, 219.


CAMBRIDGE PRINTED BY JOHN CLAY, M.A. AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS.





FOOTNOTES:

[1] See Appendix, p. 221.

[2] _Ibid._

[3] John Jennings died March 8, 1805.

[4] _Rawlings v. Jennings._ See below, p. 138, and Appendix, p. 221.

[5] Captain Jennings died October 8, 1808.

[6] Houghton MSS.

[7] _Rawlings v. Jennings._ See Appendix, p. 221.

[8] Mrs Alice Jennings was buried at St Stephen's, Coleman Street,
December 19, 1814, aged 78. (Communication from the Rev. J. W. Pratt,
M.A.)

[9] I owe this anecdote to Mr Gosse, who had it direct from Horne.

[10] Houghton MSS.

[11] A specimen of such scribble, in the shape of a fragment of romance
narrative, composed in the sham Old-English of Rowley, and in prose, not
verse, will be found in _The Philosophy of Mystery_, by W. C. Dendy
(London, 1841), p. 99, and another, preserved by Mr H. Stephens, in the
_Poetical Works_, ed. Forman (1 vol. 1884), p. 558.

[12] See Appendix.

[13] See C. L. Feltoe, _Memorials of J. F. South_ (London, 1884), p. 81.

[14] Houghton MSS. See also Dr B. W. Richardson in the _Asclepiad_, vol.
i. p. 134.

[15] Houghton MSS.

[16] What, for instance, can be less Spenserian and at the same time less
Byronic than--

  "For sure so fair a place was never seen
  Of all that ever charm'd romantic eye"?

[17] See Appendix, p. 222.

[18] See Appendix, p. 223.

[19] See particularly the _Invocation to Sleep_ in the little volume of
Webb's poems published by the Olliers in 1821.

[20] See Appendix, p. 223.

[21] See _Praeterita_, vol. ii. chap. 2.

[22] See Appendix, p. 224.

[23] Compare Chapman, _Hymn to Pan_:--

              "the bright-hair'd god of pastoral,
  Who yet is lean and loveless, and doth owe,
  By lot, all loftiest mountains crown'd with snow,
  All tops of hills, and _cliffy highnesses_,
  All sylvan copses, and the fortresses
  Of thorniest queaches here and there doth rove,
  And sometimes, by allurement of his love,
  Will wade the _wat'ry softnesses_."

[24] Compare Wordsworth:--

            "Bees that soar for bloom,
  High as the highest peak of Furness Fells,
  Will murmur by the hour in foxglove bells."

Is the line of Keats an echo or merely a coincidence?

[25] Mr W. T. Arnold in his _Introduction_ (p. xxvii) quotes a parallel
passage from Leigh Hunt's _Gentle Armour_ as an example of the degree to
which Keats was at this time indebted to Hunt: forgetting that the _Gentle
Armour_ was not written till 1831, and that the debt in this instance is
therefore the other way.

[26] See Appendix, p. 220.

[27] The facts and dates relating to Brown in the above paragraph were
furnished by his son, still living in New Zealand, to Mr Leslie Stephen,
from whom I have them. The point about the _Adventures of a Younger Son_
is confirmed by the fact that the mottoes in that work are mostly taken
from the Keats MSS. then in Brown's hands, especially _Otho_.

[28] Houghton MSS.

[29] See Appendix, p. 224.

[30] See Appendix, p. 225.

[31] See Appendix, p. 225.

[32] In the extract I have modernized Drayton's spelling and endeavoured
to mend his punctuation: his grammatical constructions are past mending.

[33] Mrs Owen was, I think, certainly right in her main conception of an
allegoric purpose vaguely underlying Keats's narrative.

[34] Lempriere (after Pausanias) mentions Pæon as one of the fifty sons of
Endymion (in the Elean version of the myth): and in Spenser's _Faerie
Queene_ there is a Pæana--the daughter of the giant Corflambo in the
fourth book. Keats probably had both of these in mind when he gave
Endymion a sister and called her Peona.

[35] Book 1, Song 4. The point about Browne has been made by Mr W. T.
Arnold.

[36] The following is a fair and characteristic enough specimen of
Chamberlayne:--

  "Upon the throne, in such a glorious state
  As earth's adored favorites, there sat
  The image of a monarch, vested in
  The spoils of nature's robes, whose price had been
  A diadem's redemption; his large size,
  Beyond this pigmy age, did equalize
  The admired proportions of those mighty men
  Whose cast-up bones, grown modern wonders, when
  Found out, are carefully preserved to tell
  Posterity how much these times are fell
  From nature's youthful strength."

[37] See Appendix, p. 226.

[38] Houghton MSS.

[39] See Appendix, p. 227.

[40] Severn in Houghton MSS.

[41] Houghton MSS.

[42] Dilke (in a MS. note to his copy of Lord Houghton's _Life and
Letters_, ed. 1848) states positively that Lockhart afterwards owned as
much; and there are tricks of style, _e.g._ the use of the Spanish
_Sangrado_ for doctor, which seem distinctly to betray his hand.

[43] Leigh Hunt at first believed that Scott himself was the writer, and
Haydon to the last fancied it was Scott's faithful satellite, the actor
Terry.

[44] Severn in the _Atlantic Monthly_, Vol. XI., p. 401.

[45] See Preface, p. viii.

[46] See Appendix, p. 227.

[47] Houghton MSS.

[48] The house is now known as Lawn Bank, the two blocks having been
thrown into one, with certain alterations and additions which in the
summer of 1885 were pointed out to me in detail by Mr William Dilke, the
then surviving brother of Keats's friend.

[49] See Appendix, p. 227.

[50] See Appendix, p. 228.

[51] _Decamerone_, Giorn., iv. nov. 5. A very different metrical treatment
of the same subject was attempted and published, almost simultaneously
with that of Keats, by Barry Cornwall in his _Sicilian Story_ (1820). Of
the metrical tales from Boccaccio which Reynolds had agreed to write
concurrently with Keats (see above, p. 86), two were finished and
published by him after Keats's death in the volume called _A Garden of
Florence_ (1821).

[52] As to the date when _Hyperion_ was written, see Appendix, p. 228: and
as to the error by which Keats's later recast of his work has been taken
for an earlier draft, _ibid._, p. 230.

[53] If we want to see Greek themes treated in a Greek manner by
predecessors or contemporaries of Keats, we can do so--though only on a
cameo scale--in the best idyls of Chénier in France, as _L'Aveugle_ or _Le
Jeune Malade_, or of Landor in England, as the _Hamadryad_ or _Enallos and
Cymodamia_; poems which would hardly have been written otherwise at
Alexandria in the days of Theocritus.

[54] We are not surprised to hear of Keats, with his instinct for the
best, that what he most liked in Chatterton's work was the minstrel's song
in _Ælla_, that _fantasia_, so to speak, executed really with genius on
the theme of one of Ophelia's songs in _Hamlet_.

[55] A critic, not often so in error, has contended that the deaths of the
beadsman and Angela in the concluding stanza are due to the exigencies of
rhyme. On the contrary, they are foreseen from the first: that of the
beadsman in the lines,

  "But no--already had his death-bell rung;
  The joys of all his life were said and sung;"

that of Angela where she calls herself

  "A poor, weak, palsy-stricken, churchyard thing,
  Whose passing bell may ere the midnight toll."

[56] See Appendix, p. 229.

[57] Chartier was born at Bayeux. His _Belle Dame sans Merci_ is a poem of
over eighty stanzas, the introduction in narrative and the rest in
dialogue, setting forth the obduracy shown by a lady to her wooer, and his
consequent despair and death.--For the date of composition of Keats's
poem, see Appendix, p. 230.

[58] This has been pointed out by my colleague Mr A. S. Murray: see
Forman, _Works_, vol. iii. p. 115, note; and W. T. Arnold, _Poetical
Works_, &c., p. xxii, note.

[59] Houghton MSS.

[60] "He never spoke of any one," says Severn, (Houghton MSS.,) "but by
saying something in their favour, and this always so agreeably and
cleverly, imitating the manner to increase your favourable impression of
the person he was speaking of."

[61] See Appendix, p. 230.

[62] _Auctores Mythographi Latini_, ed. Van Staveren, Leyden, 1742.
Keats's copy of the book was bought by him in 1819, and passed after his
death into the hands first of Brown, and afterwards of Archdeacon Bailey
(Houghton MSS.). The passage about Moneta which had wrought in Keats's
mind occurs at p. 4, in the notes to Hyginus.

[63] Mrs Owen was the first of Keats's critics to call attention to this
passage, without, however, understanding the special significance it
derives from the date of its composition.

[64] Houghton MSS.

[65] See below, p. 193, note 2.

[66] "Interrupted," says Brown oracularly in Houghton MSS., "by a
circumstance which it is needless to mention."

[67] This passing phrase of Brown, who lived with Keats in the closest
daily companionship, by itself sufficiently refutes certain statements of
Haydon. But see Appendix, p. 232.

[68] A week or two later Leigh Hunt printed in the _Indicator_ a few
stanzas from the _Cap and Bells_, and about the same time dedicated to
Keats his translation of Tasso's _Amyntas_, speaking of the original as
"an early work of a celebrated poet whose fate it was to be equally
pestered by the critical and admired by the poetical."

[69] See Crabb Robinson. _Diaries_, Vol. II. p. 197, etc.

[70] See Appendix, p. 233.

[71] Houghton MSS. In both the _Autobiography_ and the _Correspondence_
the passage is amplified with painful and probably not trustworthy
additions.

[72] I have the date of sailing from Lloyd's, through the kindness of the
secretary, Col. Hozier. For the particulars of the voyage and the time
following it, I have drawn in almost equal degrees from the materials
published by Lord Houghton, by Mr Forman, by Severn himself in _Atlantic
Monthly_, Vol. XI. p. 401, and from the unpublished Houghton and Severn
MSS.

[73] Severn, as most readers will remember, died at Rome in 1879, and his
remains were in 1882 removed from their original burying-place to a grave
beside those of Keats in the Protestant cemetery near the pyramid of Gaius
Cestius.

[74] Haslam, in Severn MSS.

[75] Severn MSS.

[76] Houghton MSS.

[77] _Ibid._

[78] Houghton MSS.

[79] _Ibid._




English Men of Letters.

EDITED BY JOHN MORLEY.

_Popular Edition. Crown 8vo. Paper Covers, 1s.; Cloth, 1s. 6d. each._

_Pocket Edition. Fcap. 8vo. Cloth. 1s. net each._

_Library Edition. Crown 8vo. Gilt tops. Flat backs. 2s. net each._


  ADDISON.
    By W. J. COURTHOPE.

  BACON.
    By DEAN CHURCH.

  BENTLEY.
    By Sir RICHARD JEBB.

  BUNYAN.
    By J. A. FROUDE.

  BURKE.
    By JOHN MORLEY.

  BURNS.
    By Principal SHAIRP.

  BYRON.
    By Professor NICHOL.

  CARLYLE.
    By Professor NICHOL.

  CHAUCER.
    By Dr. A. W. WARD.

  COLERIDGE.
    By H. D. TRAILL.

  COWPER.
    By GOLDWIN SMITH.

  DEFOE.
    By W. MINTO.

  DE QUINCEY.
    By Professor MASSON.

  DICKENS.
    By Dr. A. W. WARD.

  DRYDEN.
    By Professor SAINTSBURY.

  FIELDING.
    By AUSTIN DOBSON.

  GIBBON.
    By J. C. MORISON.

  GOLDSMITH.
    By W. BLACK.

  GRAY.
    By EDMUND GOSSE.

  HAWTHORNE.
    By HENRY JAMES.

  HUME.
    By Professor HUXLEY, F.R.S.

  JOHNSON.
    By Sir LESLIE STEPHEN, K.C.B.

  KEATS.
    By Sir SIDNEY COLVIN.

  LAMB, CHARLES.
    By Canon AINGER.

  LANDOR.
    By Sir SIDNEY COLVIN.

  LOCKE.
    By THOMAS FOWLER.

  MACAULAY.
    By J. C. MORISON.

  MILTON.
    By MARK PATTISON.

  POPE.
    By Sir LESLIE STEPHEN, K.C.B.

  SCOTT.
    By R. H. HUTTON.

  SHELLEY.
    By J. A. SYMONDS.

  SHERIDAN.
    By Mrs. OLIPHANT.

  SIDNEY.
    By J. A. SYMONDS.

  SOUTHEY.
    By Professor DOWDEN.

  SPENSER.
    By Dean CHURCH.

  STERNE.
    By H. D. TRAILL.

  SWIFT.
    By Sir LESLIE STEPHEN, K.C.B.

  THACKERAY.
    By ANTHONY TROLLOPE.

  WORDSWORTH.
    By F. W. H. MYERS.


English Men of Letters.

NEW SERIES.

_Crown 8vo. Gilt tops. Flat backs. 2s. net each._

MATTHEW ARNOLD. By HERBERT W. PAUL.

SIR THOMAS BROWNE. By EDMUND GOSSE.

BROWNING. By G. K. CHESTERTON.

FANNY BURNEY. By AUSTIN DOBSON.

CRABBE. By ALFRED AINGER.

MARIA EDGEWORTH. By the Hon. EMILY LAWLESS.

GEORGE ELIOT. By SIR LESLIE STEPHEN, K.C.B.

EDWARD FITZGERALD. By A. C. BENSON.

HAZLITT. By AUGUSTINE BIRRELL, K.C.

HOBBES. By Sir LESLIE STEPHEN, K.C.B.

ANDREW MARVELL. By AUGUSTINE BIRRELL, K.C.

THOMAS MOORE. By STEPHEN GWYNN.

WILLIAM MORRIS. By ALFRED NOYES.

WALTER PATER. By A. C. BENSON.

RICHARDSON. By AUSTIN DOBSON.

ROSSETTI. By A. C. BENSON.

RUSKIN. By FREDERIC HARRISON.

SHAKESPEARE. By WALTER RALEIGH.

ADAM SMITH. By FRANCIS W. HIRST.

SYDNEY SMITH. By GEORGE W. E. RUSSELL.

JEREMY TAYLOR. By EDMUND GOSSE.

TENNYSON. By SIR ALFRED LYALL.

JAMES THOMSON. By G. C. MACAULAY.


_In preparation._

MRS. GASKELL. By CLEMENT SHORTER.

BEN JONSON. By Prof. GREGORY SMITH.


MACMILLAN AND CO., LTD., LONDON.