Vol 5: The Classics - Part 2






















Whilst the rights of all 
as persons are equal, in virtue of their access to reason, their rights in 
property are very unequal. One man owns his clothes, and another 
owns a county. This accident, depending, primarily, on the skill and 



POLITICS 241 

virtue of the parties, of whicli there is every degree, and secondarily, 
on patrimony, falls unequally, and its rights, of course, are unequal. 
Personal rights, universally the same, demand a government framed 
on the ratio of the census: property demands a government framed 
on the ratio of owners and of owning. Laban, who has flocks and 
herds, wishes them looked after by an officer on the frontiers, lest 
the Midianites shall drive them off, and pays a tax to that end. Jacob 
has no flocks or herds, and no fear of the Midianites, and pays no tax 
to the officer. It seemed fit that Laban and Jacob should have equal 
rights to elect the officer, who is to defend their persons, but that 
Laban and not Jacob, should elect the officer who is to guard the 
sheep and cattle. And, if question arise whether additional officers or 
watch-towers should be provided, must not Laban and Isaac, and 
those who must sell part of their herds to buy protection for the rest, 
judge better of this, and with more right, than Jacob, who, because 
he is a youth and a traveller, eats their bread and not his own ? 

In the earliest society the proprietors made their own wealth, and 
so long as it comes to the owners in the direct way, no other opinion 
would arise in any equitable community, than that property should 
make the law for property, and persons the law for persons. 

But property passes through donation or inheritance to those who 
do not create it. Gift, in one case, makes it as i eally the new owner's, 
as labor made it the first owner's, in the other case, of patrimony, the 
law makes an ownership, which will be valid in each man's view 
according to the estimate which he sets on the public tranquillity. 

It was not, however, found easy to embody the readily admitted 
principle, that property should make law for property, and persons 
for persons: since persons and property mixed themselves in every 
transaction. At last it seems settled, that the rightful distinction was, 
that the proprietors should have more elective franchise than non- 
proprietors, on the Spartan principle of "calling that which is just, 
equal; not that which is equal, just." 

That principle no longer looks so self evident as it appeared in 
former times, partly, because doubts have arisen whether too much 
weight had not been allowed in the laws, to property, and such a 
structure given to our usages, as allowed the rich to encroach on the 
poor, and to keep them poor; but mainly, because there is an instinc- 



242 RALPH WALDO EMERSON 

tive sense, however obscure and yet inarticulate, that the whole con- 
stitution of property, on its present tenures, is injurious, and its 
influence on persons deteriorating and degrading; that truly, the only 
interest for the consideration of the State, is persons; that property 
will always follow persons; that the highest end of government is 
the culture of men : and if men can be educated, the institutions will 
share their improvement, and the moral sentiment will write the 
law of the land. 

If it be not easy to setde the equity of this question, the peril is less 
when we take note of our natural defences. We are kept by better 
guards than the vigilance of such magistrates as we commonly elect. 
Society always consists, in greatest part, of young and foolish persons. 
The old, who have seen through the hypocrisy of courts and states- 
men, die, and leave no wisdom to their sons. They believe their 
own newspaper, as their fathers did at their age. With such an ignor- 
ant and deceivable majority, States would soon run to ruin, but that 
there are limitations beyond which the folly and ambition of 
governors cannot go. Things have their laws, as well as men; and 
things refuse to be trifled with. Property will be protected. Corn 
will not grow, unless it is planted and manured; but the farmer 
will not plant or hoe it, unless the chances are a hundred to one, 
that he will cut and harvest it. Under any forms, persons and 
property must and will have their just sway. They exert their power, 
as steadily as matter its attraction. Cover up a pound of earth never 
so cunningly, divide and subdivide it; melt it to liquid, convert it 
to gas; it will always weigh a pound: it will always attract and resist 
other matter, by the full virtue of one pound weight; — and the attri- 
butes of a person, his wit and his moral energy, will exercise, under 
any law or extinguishing tyranny, their proper force, — if not overtly, 
then covertly; if not for the law, then against it; with right, or by 
might. 

The boundaries of personal influence it is impossible to fix, as 
persons are organs of moral or supernatural force. Under the domin- 
ion of an idea, which possesses the minds of multitudes, as civil 
freedom, or the religious sentiment, the powers of persons are no 
longer subjects of calculation. A nation of men unanimously bent 
on freedom, or conquest, can easily confound the arithmetic of stat- 



POLITICS 243 

ists, and achieve extravagant actions, out of all proportion to their 
means; as, the Greeks, the Saracens, the Swiss, the Americans, and 
the French have done. 

In like manner, to every particle of property belongs its own attrac- 
tion. A cent is the representative of a certain quantity of corn or 
other commodity. Its value is in the necessities of the animal man. 
It is so much warmth, so much bread, so much water, so much land. 
The law may do what it will with the owner of property, its just 
power will still attach to the cent. The law may in a mad freak say, 
that all shall have power except the owners of property: they shall 
have no vote. Nevertheless, by a higher law, the property wiU, year 
after year, write every statute that respects property. The non- 
proprietor will be the scribe of the proprietor. What the owners wish 
to do, the whole power of property will do, either through the law, 
or else in defiance of it. Of course, I speak of all the property, not 
merely of the great estates. When the rich are outvoted, as fre- 
quently happens, it is the joint treasury of the poor which exceeds 
their accumulations. Every man owns something, if it is only a cow, 
or a wheelbarrow, or his arms, and so has that property to dispose of. 

The same necessity which secures the rights of person and prop- 
erty against the malignity or folly of the magistrate, determines the 
form and methods of governing, which are proper to each nation, 
and to its habit of thought, and nowise transferable to other states of 
society. In this country, we are very vain of our political institutions, 
which are singular in this, that they sprung, within the memory of 
living men, from the character and condition of the people, which 
they still express with sufficient fidehty, — and we ostentatiously pre- 
fer them to any other in history. They are not better, but only fitter 
for us. We may be wise in asserting the advantage in modern times 
of the democratic form, but to other states of society, in which 
rehgion consecrated the monarchical, that and not this was expedient. 
Democracy is better for us, because the religious sentiment of the 
present time accords better with it. Born democrats, we are nowise 
qualified to judge of monarchy, which, to our fathers living in the 
monarchical idea, was also relatively right. But our institutions, 
though in coincidence with the spirit of the age, have not any exemp- 
tion from the practical defects which have discredited other forms. 



244 RALPH WALDO EMERSON 

Every actual State is corrupt. Good men must not obey the laws too 
well. What satire on government can equal the severity of censure 
conveyed in the word politic, which now for ages has signified 
cunning, intimating that the State is a trick ? 

The same benign necessity and the same practical abuse appear in 
the parties into which each State divides itself of opponents and de- 
fenders of the administration of the government. Parties are also 
founded on instincts, and have better guides to their own humble 
aims than the sagacity of their leaders. They have nothing perverse 
in their origin, but rudely mark some real and lasting relation. We 
might as wisely reprove the east wind, or the frost, as a poUtical 
party, whose members, for the most part, could give no account 
of their position, but stand for the defence of those interests in which 
they find themselves. Our quarrel with them begins, when they quit 
this deep natural ground at the bidding of some leader, and, obeying 
personal considerations, throw themselves into the maintenance and 
defence of points, nowise belonging to their system. A party is per- 
petually corrupted by personality. Whilst we absolve the association 
from dishonesty, we cannot extend the same character to their lead- 
ers. They reap the rewards of the docility and zeal of the masses 
which they direct. Ordinarily, our parties are parties of circumstance, 
and not of principle; as, the planting interest in conflict with the 
commercial; the party of capitalists, and that of operatives; parties 
which are identical in their moral character, and which can easily 
change ground with each other, in the support of many of their 
measures. Parties of principle, as, religious sects, or the party of free- 
trade, of universal suffrage, of abolition of slavery, of abolition of cap- 
ital punishment, degenerate into personalities, or would inspire 
enthusiasm. The vice of our leading parties in this country (which 
may be cited as a fair specimen of these societies of opinion) is, that 
they do not plant themselves on the deep and necessary grounds to 
which they are respectively entitled, but lash themselves to fury in 
the carrying of some local and momentary measure, nowise useful to 
the commonwealth. Of the two great parties, which, at this hour, 
almost share the nation between them, I should say, that, one has the 
best cause, and the other contains the best men. The philosopher, 
the poet, or the religious man will, of course, wish to cast his vote 



POLITICS 245 

with the democrat, for free-trade, for wide suffrage, for the aboUtion 
of legal cruelties in the penal code, and for facilitating in every man- 
ner the access of the young and the poor to the sources of wealth and 
power. But he can rarely accept the persons whom the so-called 
popular party propose to him as representatives of these liberalities. 
They have not at heart the ends which give to the name of democ- 
racy what hope and virtue are in it. The spirit of our American 
radicalism is destructive and aimless: it is not loving, it has no 
ulterior and divine ends; but is destructive only out of hatred and 
selfishness. On the other side, the conservative party, composed of 
the most moderate, able, and cultivated part of the population, is 
timid, and merely defensive of property. It vindicates no right, it 
aspires to no real good, it brands no crime, it proposes no generous 
policy, it does not build, nor write, nor cherish the arts, nor foster 
rehgion, nor establish schools, nor encourage science, nor emancipate 
the slave, nor befriend the poor, or the Indian, or the immigrant. 
From neither party, when in power, has the world any benefit to 
expect in science, art, or humanity, at all commensurate with the 
resources of the nation. 

I do not for these defects despair of our republic. We are not at 
the mercy of any waves of chance. In the strife of ferocious parties, 
human nature always finds itself cherished, as the children of the 
convicts at Botany Bay are found to have as healthy a moral senti- 
ment as other children. Citizens of feudal states are alarmed at our 
democratic institutions lapsing into anarchy; and the older and 
more cautious among ourselves are learning from Europeans to 
look with some terror at our turbulent freedom. It is said that in our 
license of construing the Constitution and in the despotism of public 
opinion, we have no anchor; and one foreign observer thinks he has 
found the safeguard in the sanctity of Marriage among us; and an- 
other thinks he has found it in our Calvinism. Fisher Ames ex- 
pressed the popular security more wisely, when he compared a 
monarchy and a republic, saying, "that a monarchy is a merchant- 
man, which sails well, but will sometimes strike on a rock, and go to 
the bottom; whilst a repubUc is a raft, which would never sink, but 
then your feet are always in water." No forms can have any danger- 
ous importance, whilst we are befriended by the laws of things. 



246 RALPH WALDO EMERSON 

It makes no diflerence how many tons weight of atmosphere presses 
on our heads, so long as the same pressure resists it within the lungs. 
Augment the mass a thousand fold, it cannot begin to crush us, as 
long as reaction is equal to action. The fact of two poles, of two 
forces, centripetal and centrifugal, is universal, and each force by its 
own activity develops the other. Wild liberty develops iron con- 
science. Want of liberty, by strengthening law and decorum, stupe- 
fies conscience. "Lynch-law" prevails only where there is greater 
hardihood and self-subsistency in the leaders. A mob cannot be a 
permanency: everybody's interest requires that it should not exist, 
and only justice satisfies all. 

We must trust infinitely to the beneficent necessity which shines 
through all laws. Human nature expresses itself in them as charac- 
teristically as in statues, or songs, or railroads, and an abstract of the 
codes of nations would be a transcript of the common conscience. 
Governments have their origin in the moral identity of men. Reason 
for one is seen to be reason for another, and for every other. There 
is a middle measure which satisfies all parties, be they never so many, 
or so resolute for their own. Every man finds a sanction for his 
simplest claims and deeds in decisions of his own mind, which he 
calls Truth and HoHness. In these decisions all the citizens find a 
perfect agreement, and only in these; not in what is good to eat, good 
to wear, good use of time, or what amount of land, or of public aid, 
each is entitled to claim. This truth and justice men presently en- 
deavor to make application of, to the measuring of land, the appor- 
tionment of service, the protection of life and property. Their first 
endeavors, no doubt, are very awkward. Yet absolute right is the 
first governor; or, every government is an impure theocracy. The 
idea, after which each community is aiming to make and mend its 
law, is, the will of the wise man. The wise man, it cannot find in 
nature, and it makes awkward but earnest efforts to secure his 
government by contrivance; as, by causing the entire people to give 
their voices on every measure; or, by a double choice to get the rep- 
resentation of the whole; or, by a selection of the best citizens; or, to 
secure the advantages of efficiency and internal peace, by confiding 
the government to one, who may himself select his agents. All forms 
of government symbolize an immortal government, common to all 



POLITICS 247 

dynasties and independent of numbers, perfect where two men exist, 
perfect where there is only one man. 

Every man's nature is a sufficient advertisement to him of the 
character of his fellows. My right and my wrong, is their right and 
their wrong. Whilst I do what is fit for me, and abstain from what 
is unfit, my neighbor and I shall often agree in our means, and work 
together for a time to one end. But whenever I find my dominion 
over myself not sufficient for me, and undertake the direction of him 
also, I overstep the truth, and come into false relations to him. I may 
have so much more skill or strength than he, that he cannot express 
adequately his sense of wrong, but it is a lie, and hurts like a Ue both 
him and me. Love and nature cannot maintain the assumption: it 
must be executed by a practical lie, namely, by force. This undertak- 
ing for another, is the blunder which stands in colossal ugliness in the 
governments of the world. It is the same thing in numbers, as in a 
pair, only not quite so intelligible. I can see well enough a great dif- 
ference between my setting myself down to a self-control, and my 
going to make somebody else act after my views: but when a quarter 
of the human race assume to tell me what I must do, I may be too 
much disturbed by the circumstances to see so clearly the absurdity 
of their command. Therefore, all public ends look vague and quix- 
otic beside private ones. For, any laws but those which men make 
for themselves, are laughable. If I put myself in the place of my 
child, and we stand in one thought, and see that things are thus or 
thus, that perception is law for him and me. We are both there, both 
act. But if, without carrying him into the thought, I look over into 
his plot, and guessing how it is with him, ordain this or that, he will 
never obey me. This is the history of governments, — one man does 
something which is to bind another. A man who cannot be 
acquainted with me, taxes me; looking from afar at me, ordains that 
a part of my labor shall go to this or that whimsical end, not as I, but 
as he happens to fancy. Behold the consequence. Of all debts, men 
are least willing to pay the taxes. What a satire is this on govern- 
ment! Everywhere they think they get their money's worth, except 
for these. 

Hence, the less government we have, the better, — the fewer laws, 
and the less confided power. The antidote to this abuse of formal 



248 RALPH WALDO EMERSON 

Government, is, the influence o£ private character, the growth of the 
Individual; the reappearance of the principal to supersede the proxy; 
the appearance of the wise man, of whom the existing government, 
is, it must be owned, but a shabby imitation. That which all things 
tend to educe, which freedom, cultivation, intercourse, revolutions, 
go to form and deliver, is character; that is the end of nature, to reach 
unto this coronation, of her king. To educate the wise man, the State 
exists; and with the appearance of the wise man, the State expires. 
The appearance of character makes the State unnecessary. The wise 
man is the State. He needs no army, fort, or navy, — he loves men too 
well; no bribe, or feast, or palace, to draw friends to him; no vantage 
ground, no favorable circumstance. He needs no library, for he has 
not done thinking; no church, for he is a prophet; no statute book, 
for he is the law-giver; no money, for he is value; no road, for he is 
at home where he is; no experience, for the life of the creator shoots 
through him and looks from his eyes. He has no personal friends, for 
he who has the spell to draw the prayer and piety of all men unto 
him, needs not husband and educate a few, to share with him a select 
and poetic life. His relation to men is angelic; his memory is myrrh 
to them; his presence, frankincense and flowers. 

We think our civilization near its meridian, but we are yet only 
at the cock-crowing and the morning star. In our barbarous society 
the influence of character is in its infancy. As a political power, as 
the rightful lord who is to tumble all rulers from their chairs, its 
presence is hardly yet suspected. Malthus and Ricardo quite omit it; 
the Annual Register is silent; in the Conversations' Lexicon, it is not 
set down; the President's Message, the Queen's Speech, have not 
mentioned it; and yet it is never nothing. Every thought which 
genius and piety throw into the world, alters the world. The gladia- 
tors in the lists of power feel, through all their frocks of force and 
simulation, the presence of worth. I think the very strife of trade 
and ambition are confession of this divinity; and successes in those 
fields are the poor amends, the fig-leaf with which the shamed soul 
attempts to hide its nakedness. I find the like unwilling homage in 
all quarters. It is because we know how much is due from us that 
we are impatient to show some petty talent as a substitute for worth. 



POLITICS 249 

We are haunted by a conscience of this right to grandeur of char- 
acter, and are false to it. But each of us has some talent, can do 
somewhat useful, or graceful, or formidable, or amusing, or lucrative. 
That we do, as an apology to others and to ourselves, for not reaching 
the mark of a good and equal life. But it does not satisfy us, whilst 
we thrust it on the notice of our companions. It may throw dust 
in their eyes, but does not smooth our own brow, or give us the 
tranquillity of the strong when we walk abroad. We do penance as 
we go. Our talent is a sort of expiation, and we are constrained to 
reflect on our splendid moment, with a certain humiliation, as some- 
what too fine, and not as one act of many acts, a fair expression of 
our permanent energy. Most persons of ability meet in society with 
a kind of tacit appeal. Each seems to say, "I am not all here." Sen- 
ators and presidents have cUmbed so high with pain enough, not 
because they think the place specially agreeable, but as an apology for 
real worth, and to vindicate their manhood in our eyes. This con- 
spicuous chair is their compensation to themselves for being of a 
poor, cold, hard nature. They must do what they can. Like one class 
of forest animals, they have nothing but a prehensile tail : climb they 
must or crawl. If a man found himself so rich-natured that he could 
enter into strict relations with the best persons, and make life serene 
around him by the dignity and sweetness of his behavior, could he 
afford to circumvent the favor of the caucus and the press, and covert 
relations so hollow and pompous, as those of a politician? Surely 
nobody would be a charlatan, who could afford to be sincere. 

The tendencies of the times favor the idea of self-government, and 
leave the individual, for all code, to the rewards and penalties of his 
own constitution, which work with more energy than we believe, 
whilst we depend on artificial restraints. The movement in this 
direction has been very marked in modern history. Much has been 
blind and discreditable, but the nature of the revolution is not 
affected by the vices of the revolters; for this is a purely moral force. 
It was never adopted by any party in history, neither can be. It sep- 
arates the individual from all party, and unites him, at the same time, 
to the race. It promises a recognition of higher rights than those of 
personal freedom, or the security of property. A man has a right to 



250 RALPH WALDO EMERSON 

be employed, to be trusted, to be loved, to be revered. The power of 
love, as the basis of a State, has never been tried. We must not im- 
agine that all things are lapsing into confusion, if every tender 
protestant be not compelled to bear his part in certain social conven- 
tions: nor doubt that roads can be built, letters carried, and the fruit 
of labor secured, when the government of force is at an end. Are 
our methods now so excellent that all competition is hopeless ? Could 
not a nation of friends even devise better ways ? On the other hand, 
let not the most conservative and timid fear anything from a prema- 
ture surrender of the bayonet, and the system of force. For, accord- 
ing to the order of nature, which is quite superior to our Vidll, it 
stands thus; there will always be a government of force, where men 
are selfish; and when they are pure enough to abjure the code of 
force, they will be wise enough to see how these public ends of the 
post-office, of the highway, of commerce, and the exchange of prop- 
erty, of museums and libraries, of institutions of art and science, can 
be answered. 

We Hve in a very low state of the world, and pay unwilling tribute 
to governments founded on force. There is not, among the most 
religious and instructed men of the most reUgious and civil nations, 
a reliance on the moral sentiment, and a sufficient belief in the unity 
of things to persuade them that society can be maintained without 
artificial restraints, as well as the solar system; or that the private 
citizen might be reasonable, and a good neighbor, without the hint 
of a jail or a confiscadon. What is strange too, there never was in any 
man sufficient faith in the power of recdtude, to inspire him with the 
broad design of renovating the State on the principle of right and 
love. AU those who have pretended this design, have been partial 
reformers, and have admitted in some manner the supremacy of the 
bad State. I do not call to mind a single human being who has 
steadily denied the authority of the laws, on the simple ground of his 
own moral nature. Such designs, full of genius and full of fate as 
they are, are not entertained except avowedly as air-pictures. If the 
individual who exhibits them, dare to think them practicable, he 
disgusts scholars and churchmen; and men of talent, and women of 
superior sentiments, cannot hide their contempt. Not the less does 



POLITICS 251 

nature continue to fill the heart of youth with suggestions of this 
enthusiasm, and there are now men, — if indeed I can speak in the 
plural number, — more exactly, I will say, I have just been conversing 
with one man, to whom no weight of adverse experience will make 
it for a moment appear impossible, that thousands of human beings 
might exercise towards each other the grandest and simplest senti- 
ments, as well as a knot of friends, or a pair of lovers. 



NEW ENGLAND REFORMERS 

A Lecture Read Before the Society in Amory Hall on 
Sunday, March 3, 1844. 

WHOEVER has had opportunity of acquaintance with soci- 
ety in New England during the last twenty-five years, with 
those middle and with those leading sections that may 
constitute any just representation of the character and aim of the 
community, will have been struck with the great activity of thought 
and experimenting. His attention must be commanded by the signs 
that the Church or religious party is falling from the church nominal, 
and is appearing in temperance and non-resistance societies, in 
movements of abolitionists and of socialists, and in very significant 
assembUes, called Sabbath and Bible Conventions — composed of ul- 
traists, of seekers, of all the soul of the soldiery of dissent, and meet- 
ing to call in question the authority of the Sabbath, of the priesthood, 
and of the church. In these movements nothing was more remark- 
able than the discontent they begot in the movers. The spirit of 
protest and of detachment drove the members of these Conventions 
to bear testimony against the church, and immediately afterward to 
declare their discontent with these Conventions, their independence 
of their colleagues, and their impatience of the methods whereby 
they were working. They defied each other, like a congress of 
kings, each of whom had a realm to rule, and a way of his own that 
made concert unprofitable. What a fertility of projects for the sal- 
vation of the world! One apostle thought all men should go to 
farming; and another, that no man should buy or sell: that the 
use of money was the cardinal evil; another, that the mischief was 
in our diet, that we eat and drink damnation. These made unleav- 
ened bread, and were foes to the death to fermentation. It was in 
vain urged by the housewife, that God made yeast as well as dough, 
and loves fermentation just as dearly as he loves vegetation; that 



254 RALPH WALDO EMERSON 

fermentation develops the saccharine element in the grain and makes 
it more palatable and more digestible. No; they wish the pure wheat, 
and will die but it shall not ferment. Stop, dear nature, these in- 
cessant advances of thine; let us scotch these ever-rolling wheels! 
Others attacked the system of agriculture, the use of animal manures 
in farming, and the tyranny of man over brute nature; these abuses 
polluted his food. The ox must be taken from the plow and the 
horse from the cart, the hundred acres of the farm must be spaded, 
and the man must walk wherever boats and locomotives will not 
carry him. Even the insect world was to be defended — that had been 
too long neglected, and a society for the protection of ground-worms, 
slugs, and mosquitoes was to be incorporated without delay. With 
these appeared the adepts of homoeopathy, of hydropathy, of mes- 
merism, of phrenology and their wonderful theories of the Christian 
miracles! Others assailed particular vocations, as that of the lawyer, 
that of the merchant, of the manufacturer, of the clergyman, of the 
scholar. Others attacked the institution of marriage, as the fountain 
of social evils. Others devoted themselves to the worrying of 
churches and meetings for public worship; and the fertile forms of 
antinomianism among the elder puritans seemed to have their match 
in the plenty of the new harvest of reform. 

With this din of opinion and debate, there was a keener scrutiny 
of institutions and domestic life than any we had known, there was 
sincere protesting against existing evils, there were changes of em- 
ployment dictated by conscience. No doubt, there was plentiful 
vaporing, and cases of back-sliding might occur. But in each of 
these movements emerged a good result, a tendency to the adoption 
of simpler methods, and an assertion of the sufficiency of the private 
man. Thus it was directly in the spirit and genius of the age, what 
happened in one instance, when a church censured and threatened 
to excommunicate one of its members on account of the somewhat 
hostile part to the church which his conscience led him to take in 
the anti-slavery business; the threatened individual immediately ex- 
communicated the church in a public and formal process. This has 
been several times repeated: it was excellent when it was done the 
first time, but, of course, loses all value when it is copied. Every 
project in the history of reform, no matter how violent and surpris- 



NEW ENGLAND REFORMERS 255 

ing, is good when it is the dictate of man's genius and constitution, 
but very dull and suspicious when adopted from another. It is right 
and beautiful in any man to say: "I will take this coat, or this book, 
or this measure of corn of yours" — in whom we see the act to be 
original, and to flow from the whole spirit and faith of him; for 
then that taking will have a giving as free and divine; but we are 
very easily disposed to resist the same generosity of speech, when we 
miss originaUty and truth to character in it. 

There was in all the practical activities of New England, for the 
last quarter of a century, a gradual withdrawal of tender consciences 
from the social organization. There is observable throughout, the 
contest between mechanical and spiritual methods, but with a steady 
tendency of the thoughtful and virtuous to a deeper belief and reli- 
ance on spiritual facts. 

In politics, for example, it is easy to see the progress of dissent. 
The country is full of rebellion; the country is full of kings. Hands 
off! let there be no control and no interference in the administration 
of the affairs of this kingdom of me. Hence the growth of the doc- 
trine and of the party of Free Trade, and the willingness to try that 
experiment, in the face of what appear incontestable facts. I confess 
the motto of the Globe newspaper is so attractive to me that I can 
seldom find much appetite to read what is below it in its columns, 
"The world is governed too much." So the country is frequently 
affording solitary examples of resistance to the government, soUtary 
nullifiers, who throw themselves on their reserved rights: nay, who 
have reserved all their rights; who reply to the assessor, and to the 
clerk of court, that they do not know the State; and embarrass the 
courts of law, by non-juring, and the commander-in-chief of the 
militia, by non-resistance. 

The same disposition to scrutiny and dissent appeared in civil, 
festive, neighborly, and domestic society. A restless, prying, consci- 
entious criticism broke out in unexpected quarters. Who gave me 
the money with which I bought my coat ? Why should professional 
labor and that of the counting-house be paid so disproportionately 
to the labor of the porter and wood-sawyer ? This whole business of 
Trade causes me to pause and think, as it constitutes false relations 
between men; inasmuch as I am prone to count myself relieved of 



256 RALPH WALDO EMERSON 

any responsibility to behave well and nobly to that person whom I 
pay with money, whereas if I had not that commodity, I should be 
put on my good behavior in all companies, and man would be a 
benefactor to man, as being himself his only certificate that he had 
a right to those aids and services which each ask of the other. Am I 
not too protected a person? Is there not a wide disparity between 
the lot of me and the lot of thee, my poor brother, my poor sister? 
Am I not defrauded of my best culture in the loss of those gym- 
nastics which manual labor and the emergencies of poverty consti- 
tute ? I find nothing healthful or exalting in the smooth conventions 
of society; I do not like the close air of saloons. I begin to suspect 
myself to be a prisoner, though treated with all this courtesy and 
luxury. I pay a destructive tax in my conformity. 

The same insatiable criticism may be traced in the efforts for the 
reform of Education. The popular education has been taxed with a 
want of truth and nature. It was complained that an education to 
things was not given. We are students of words: we are shut up in 
schools, and colleges, and recitation-rooms, for ten or fifteen years, 
and come out at last with a bag of wind, a memory of words, and 
do not know a thing. We cannot use our hands, or our legs, or our 
eyes, or our arms. We do not know an edible root in the woods, we 
cannot tell our course by the stars, nor the hour of day by the sun. 
It is well if we can swim and skate. We are afraid of a horse, of a 
cow, of a dog, of a snake, of a spider. The Roman rule was, to 
teach a boy nothing that he could not learn standing. The old 
English rule was, "All summer in the fields, and all winter in the 
study." And it seems as if a man should learn to plant, or to fish 
or to hunt, that he might secure his subsistence at all events, and not 
be painful to his friends and fellow men. The lessons of science 
should be experimental also. The sight of the planet through a 
telescope is worth all the course on astronomy: the shock of the 
electric spark in the elbow outvalues all the theories; the taste of 
the nitrous oxide, the firing of an artificial volcano, are better than 
volumes of chemistry. 

One of the traits of the new spirit is the inquisition it fixed on our 
scholastic devotion to the dead languages. The ancient languages. 



NEW ENGLAND REFORMERS 257 

with great beauty of structure, contain wonderful remains of genius, 
which draw, and always will draw, certain likeminded men — Greek 
men, and Roman men — in all countries, to their study; but by a 
wonderful drowsiness of usage, they had exacted the study of all 
men. Once (say two centuries ago), Latin and Greek had a strict 
relation to all the science and culture there was in Europe, and the 
Mathematics had a momentary importance at some era of activity 
in physical science. These things became stereotyped as education, 
as the manner of men is. But the Good Spirit never cared for the 
colleges, and though all men and boys were now drilled in Latin, 
Greek, and Mathematics, it had quite left these shells high and dry 
on the beach, and was now creating and feeding other matters at 
other ends of the world. But in a hundred high schools and colleges 
this warfare against common sense still goes on. Four, or six, or 
ten years, the pupil is parsing Greek and Latin, and as soon as he 
leaves the University, as it is ludicrously called, he shuts those books 
for the last time. Some thousands of young men are graduated at 
our colleges in this country every year, and the persons who at forty 
years still read Greek can all be counted on your hand. I never met 
with ten. Four or five persons I have seen who read Plato. 

But is not this absurd, that the whole liberal talent of this country 
should be directed in its best years on studies which lead to noth- 
ing? What was the consequence? Some intelligent person said or 
thought: "Is that Greek and Latin some spell to conjure with, and 
not words of reason ? If the physician, the lawyer, the divine, never 
use it to come at their ends, I need never learn it to come at mine. 
Conjuring is gone out of fashion, and I will omit this conjugating 
and go straight to affairs." So they jumped the Greek and Latin, 
and read law, medicine or sermons without it. To the astonishment 
of all, the self-made men took even ground at once with the oldest 
of the regular graduates, and in a few months the most conservative 
circles of Boston and New York had quite forgotten who of their 
gownsmen was college-bred and who was not. 

One tendency appears alike in the philosophical speculation and in 
the rudest democratical movements, through all the petulance and 
all the puerility, the wish, namely, to cast aside the superfluous and 



258 RALPH WALDO EMERSON 

arrive at short methods, urged, as I suppose, by an intuition that the 
human spirit is equal to all energies, alone, and that man is more 
often injured than helped by the means he uses. 

I conceive this gradual casting off of material aids, and the indi- 
cation of growing trust in the private, self-supplied powers of the 
individual, to be the affirmative principle of the recent philosophy; 
and that it is feeling its own profound truth and is reaching forward 
at this very hour to the happiest conclusions. I readily concede that 
in this, as in every period of intellectual activity, there has been a 
noise of denial and protest; much was to be resisted, much was to 
be got rid of by those who were reared in the old, before they could 
begin to affirm and to construct. Many a reformer perishes in his 
removal of rubbish — and that makes the offensiveness of the class. 
They are partial; they are not equal to the work they pretend. They 
lose their way; in the assault on the kingdom of darkness, they ex- 
pend all their energy on some accidental evil, and lose their sanity 
and power of benefit. It is of little moment that one or two or 
twenty errors of our social system be corrected, but of much that 
the man be in his senses. 

The criticism and attack on institutions which we have witnessed 
has made one thing plain, that society gains nothing while a man, 
not himself renovated, attempts to renovate things around him; he 
has become tediously good in some particular, but negligent or 
narrow in the rest; and hypocrisy and vanity are often the disgusting 
result. 

It is handsomer to remain in the establishment better than the 
establishment, and conduct that in the best manner, than to make 
a sally against evil by some single improvement, without supporting 
it by a total regeneration. Do not be so vain of your one objection. 
Do you think there is only one? Alas! my good friend, there is no 
part of society or of life better than any other part. All our things 
are right and wrong together. The wave of evil washes all our insti- 
tutions alike. Do you complain of our Marriage? Our marriage is 
no worse than our education, our diet, our trade, our social customs. 
Do you complain of the laws of Property ? It is a pedantry to give 
such importance to them. Can we not play the game of life with 
these counters as well as with those, in the institution of property 



NEW ENGLAND REFORMERS 259 

as well as out of it ? Let into it the new and renewing principle of 
love, and property will be universality. No one gives the impression 
of superiority to the institution, which he must give who will reform 
it. It makes no difference what you say, you must make me feel 
that you are aloof from it, by your natural and supernatural advan- 
tages, do easily see to the end of it — do see how man can do with- 
out it. Now all men are on one side. No man deserves to be heard 
against property. Only Love, only an Idea, is against property, as 
we hold it. 

I cannot afford to be irritable and captious, nor waste all my time 
in attacks. If I should go out of church whenever I hear a false 
statement, I could never stay there five minutes. But why come out? 
The street is as false as the church, and when I get to my house, 
or to my manners, or to my speech, I have not got away from the 
lie. When we see an eager assailant of one of these wrongs, a special 
reformer, we feel like asking him, What right have you, sir, to your 
one virtue? Is virtue piecemeal? This is a jewel amid the rags of 
a beggar. 

In another way the right will be vindicated. In the midst of 
abuses, in the heart of cities, in the aisles of false churches, alike in 
one place and in another — wherever, namely, a just and heroic soul 
finds itself, there it will do what is next at hand, and by the new 
quality of character it shall put forth, it shall abrogate that old 
condition, law or school in which it stands, before the law of its 
own mind. 

If partiality was one fault of the movement party, the other defect 
was their reliance on Association. Doubts such as those I have inti- 
mated drove many good persons to agitate the questions of social 
reform. But the revolt against the spirit of commerce, the spirit of 
aristocracy, and the inveterate abuses of cities, did not appear possible 
to individuals; and to do battle against numbers, they armed them- 
selves with numbers, and against concert, they relied on new concert. 

Following or advancing beyond the ideas of St. Simon, of Fourier, 
and of Owen, three communities have already been formed in Massa- 
chusetts on kindred plans, and many more in the country at large. 
They aim to give every member a share in the manual labor, and 
to give an equal reward to labor and to talent; and to unite a liberal 



26o RALPH WALDO EMERSON 

culture with an education to labor. The scheme offers, by the 
economies of associated labor and expense, to make every member 
rich, on the same amount of property that in separate families would 
leave every member poor. These new associations are composed o£ 
men and women of superior talents and sentiments; yet it may easily 
be questioned whether such a community will draw, except in its 
beginnings, the able and the good; whether those who have energy 
will not prefer their chance of superiority and power in the world 
to the humble certainties of the Association; whether such a retreat 
does not promise to become an asylum to those who have tried and 
failed, rather than a field to the strong; and whether the members 
will not necessarily be fractions of men, because each finds that he 
cannot enter it without some compromise. Friendship and associa- 
tion are very fine things, and a grand phalanx of the best of the 
human race, banded for some catholic object. Yes, excellent, but 
remember that no society can ever be so large as one man. He, in 
his friendship, in his natural and momentary associations, doubles 
or multiplies himself, but in the hour in which he mortgages him- 
self to two or ten or twenty, he dwarfs himself below the stature 
of one. 

But the men of less faith could not thus believe, and to such, 
concert appears the sole specific of strength. I have failed, and you 
have failed, but perhaps together we shall not fail. Our housekeep- 
ing is not satisfactory to us, but perhaps a phalanx, a community, 
might be. Many of us have differed in opinion, and we could find 
no man who could make the truth plain, but possibly a college or 
an ecclesiastical council might. I have not been able either to per- 
suade my brother, or to prevail on myself, to disuse the traffic or the 
potation of brandy, but perhaps a pledge of total abstinence might 
effectually restrain us. The candidate my party votes for is not to be 
trusted with a dollar, but he will be honest in the Senate, for we can 
bring public opinion to bear on him. Thus concert was the specific 
in all cases. But concert is neither better nor worse, neither more 
nor less potent than individual force. All the men in the world 
cannot make a statue walk and speak, cannot make a drop of blood, 
or a blade of grass, any more than one man can. But let there be 
one man, let there be truth in two men, in ten men, then is concert 



NEW ENGLAND REFORMERS 26 1 

for the first time possible, because the force which moves the world 
is a new quality, and can never be furnished by adding whatever 
quantities of a different kind. What is the use of the concert of 
the false and the disunited? There can be no concert in two where 
there is no concert in one. When the individual is not individual, 
but is dual; when his thoughts look one way and his actions another; 
when his faith is traversed by his habits, when his will, enUghtened 
by reason, is warped by his sense; when with one hand he rows, 
and with the other backs water, what concert can be? 

I do not wonder at the interest these projects inspire. The world 
is awaking to the idea of union, and these experiments show what 
it is thinking of. It is and will be magic. Men will live and com- 
municate, and plow, and reap, and govern, as by added ethereal 
power, when once they are united, as in a celebrated experiment; 
by expiration and respiration exacdy together, four persons lift a 
heavy man from the ground by the little finger only, and without 
sense of weight. But this union must be inward and not one of the 
covenants, and is to be reached by a reverse of the methods they use. 
The union is only perfect when all the uniters are isolated. It is the 
union of friends who Uve in different streets or towns. Each man, 
if he attempts to join himself to others, is on all sides cramped and 
diminished of his proportion, and the stricter the union the smaller 
and the more pitiful he is. But leave him alone to recognize in every 
hour and place the secret soul, he will go up and down doing the 
works of a true member, and, to the astonishment of all the work 
will be done with concert, though no man spoke. Government will 
be adamantine without any governor. The union must be ideal in 
actual individualism. 

I pass to the indication in some particulars of that faith in man, 
which the heart is preaching in these days, and which engages more 
regard from the consideration that the speculations of one generation 
are the history of the next following. 

In alluding just now to our system of education, I spoke of the 
deadness of its details. But it is open to graver criticism than the 
palsy of its members, it is a system of despair. The disease with 
which the human mind now labors is want of faith. Men do not 
believe in a power of education. We do not think we can speak to 



262 RALPH WALDO EMERSON 

divine sentiments in man, and we do not try. We renounce all high 
aims. We believe that the defects of so many perverse and so many 
frivolous people, who make up society, are organic, and society is a 
hospital of incurables. A man of good sense but of htde faith, whose 
compassion seemed to lead him to church as often as he went there, 
said to me "that he liked to have concerts, and fairs, and churches 
and other public amusements go on." I am afraid the remark is too 
honest, and comes from the same origin as the maxim of the tyrant, 
"If you would rule the world quietly, you must keep it amused." I 
notice, too, that the ground on which eminent public servants urge 
the claims of popular education is fear: "This country is filling up 
with thousands and millions of voters, and you must educate them 
to keep them from our throats." We do not believe that any educa- 
tion, any system of philosophy, any influence of genius, will ever 
give depth of insight to a superficial mind. Having settled ourselves 
into this infidelity, our skill is expended to procure alleviations, 
diversion, opiates. We adorn the victim with manual skill, his 
tongue with languages, his body with inoffensive and comely man- 
ners. So have we cunningly hid the tragedy of limitation and inner 
death we cannot avert. Is it strange that society should be devoured 
by a secret melancholy, which breaks through all its smiles and all 
its gayety and games? 

But even one step further our infidelity has gone. It appears that 
some doubt is felt by good and wise men whether really the happi- 
ness and probity of men is increased by the culture of the mind in 
those disciplines to which we give the name of education. Un- 
happily, too, the doubt comes from scholars, from persons who 
have tried these methods. In their experience, the scholar was not 
raised by the sacred thoughts among which he dwelt, but used them 
to selfish ends. He was a profane person and became a showman, 
turning his gifts to a marketable use and not to his own sustenance 
and growth. It was found that the intellect could be independently 
developed, that is, in separation from the man, as any single organ 
can be invigorated, and the result was monstrous. A canine appetite 
for knowledge was generated, which must still be fed, but was never 
satisfied, and this knowledge not being directed on action, never took 
the character of substantial, humane truth, blessing those whom it 



NEW ENGLAND REFORMERS 263 

entered. It gave the scholar certain powers of expression, the power 
of speech, the power of poetry, of Uterary art, but it did not bring 
him to peace, or to beneficence. 

When the hterary class betray a destitution of faith, it is not strange 
that society should be disheartened and sensualized by unbelief. 
What remedy? Life must be lived on a higher plane. We must go 
up to a higher platform, to which we are always invited to ascend, 
there the whole aspect of things changes. I resist the skepticism of 
our education, and of our educated men. I do not believe that the 
differences of opinion and character in men are organic. I do not 
recognize, beside the class of the good and the wise, a permanent 
class of skeptics, or a class of conservatives, or of malignants, or of 
materialists. I do not believe in two classes. You remember the 
story of the poor woman who importuned King Philip of Macedon 
to grant her justice, which Philip refused; the woman exclaimed, "I 
appeal;" the king, astonished, asked to whom she appealed: the 
woman replied, "from Philip drunk to Philip sober." The text will 
suit me very well. I believe not in two classes of men, but in man in 
two moods — in Philip drunk and PhiUp sober. I think, according to 
the good-hearted word of Plato, "Unwillingly the soul is deprived 
of truth." Iron conservative, miser, or thief, no man is, but by a 
supposed necessity, which he tolerates by shortness or torpidity of 
sight. The soul lets no man go without some visitations and holy- 
days of a diviner presence. It would be easy to show, by a narrow 
scanning of a man's biography, that we are not so wedded to our 
paltry performances of every kind, but that every man has at 
intervals the grace to scorn his performances in comparing them 
with his belief of what he should do, that he puts himself on the 
side of his enemies, listening gladly to what they say of him, and 
accusing himself of the same things. 

What is it men love in Genius, but its infinite hope, which de- 
grades all it has done? Genius counts all its miracles poor and 
short. Its own idea it never executed. The Iliad, the Hamlet, the 
Doric column, the Roman arch, the Gothic minster, the German 
anthem, when they are ended, the master casts behind him. How 
sinks the song in the waves of melody which the universe pours 
over his soul! Before that gracious Infinite, out of which he drew 



264 RALPH WALDO EMERSON 

these few strokes, how mean they look, though the praises of the 
world attend them. From the triumphs of his art, he turns with 
desire to this greater defeat. Let those admire who will. With silent 
joy he sees himself to be capable of a beauty that eclipses all which 
his hands have done, all which human hands have ever done. 

Well, we are all children of genius, the children of virtue, and 
feel their inspirations in our happier hours. Is not every man some- 
times a radical in politics? Men are conservatives when they are 
least vigorous, or when they are most luxurious. They are conserva- 
tives after dinner, or before taking their rest; when they are sick or 
aged; in the morning, or when their intellect or their conscience 
have been aroused; when they hear music or when they read poetry 
they are radicals. In the circle of the rankest tories that could be 
collected in England, Old or New, let a powerful and stimulating 
intellect, a man of great heart and mind act on them, and very 
quickly these frozen conservators will yield to the friendly influence, 
these hopeless will begin to hope, these haters will begin to love, 
these immovable statues will begin to spin and revolve. I cannot 
help recalling the fine anecdote which Warton relates of Bishop 
Berkeley, when he was preparing to leave England with his plan 
of planting the gospel among the American savages. "Lord Bathurst 
told me that the members of the Scriblerus Club being met at his 
house at dinner, they agreed to rally Berkeley, who was also his 
guest, on his scheme at Bermudas. Berkeley, having listened to the 
many lively things they had to say, begged to be heard in his turn, 
and displayed his plan with such an astonishing and animating 
force of eloquence and enthusiasm that they were struck dumb, 
and after some pause, rose up all together with earnestness, exclaim- 
ing: 'Let us set out with him immediately.' " Men in all ways are 
better than they seem. They like flattery for the moment, but they 
know the truth for their own. It is a foolish cowardice which keeps 
us from trusting them, and speaking to them rude truth. They re- 
sent your honesty for an instant, they will thank you for it always. 
What is it we heartily wish of each other? Is it to be pleased and 
flattered? No, but to be convicted and exposed, to be shamed out 
of our nonsense of all kinds, and made men of, instead of ghosts 
and phantoms. We are weary of gliding ghost-like through the 



NEW ENGLAND REFORMERS 265 

world, which is itself so slight and unreal. We crave a sense of 
reality, though it come in strokes of pain. I explain so — by this 
manlike love of truth — those excesses and errors into which souls 
of great vigor, but not equal insight, often fall. They feel the 
poverty at the bottom of all the seeming affluence of the world. 
They know the speed with which they come straight through the 
thin masquerade, and conceive a disgust at the indigence of nature: 
Rousseau, Mirabeau, Charles Fox, Napoleon, Byron — and I could 
easily add names nearer home, of raging riders, who drive their 
steeds so hard in the violence of living to forget its illusion: they 
would know the worst, and tread the floors of hell. The heroes of 
ancient and modern fame, Cimon, Themistocles, Alcibiades, Alex- 
ander, CjEsar, have treated life and fortune as a game to be well and 
skilfully played, but the stake not to be so valued, but that any time, 
it could be held as a trifle light as air, and thrown up. Caesar, just 
before the battle of Pharsalia, discourses with the Egyptian priest 
concerning the fountains of the Nile, and offers to quit the army, 
the empire, and Cleopatra, if he will show him those mysterious 
sources. 

The same magnanimity shows itself in our social relations, in the 
preference, namely, which each man gives to the society of superiors 
over that of his equals. All that a man has will he give for right 
relations with his mates. All that he has will he give for an erect 
demeanor in every company and on each occasion. He aims at such 
things as his neighbors prize, and gives his days and nights, his 
talents and his heart, to strike a good stroke, to acquit himself in all 
men's sight as a man. The consideration of an eminent citizen, of 
a noted merchant, of a man of mark in his profession; naval and 
military honor, a general's commission, a marshal's baton, a ducal 
coronet, the laurel of poets, and, anyhow procured, the acknowledg- 
ment of eminent merit, have this lustre for each candidate, that they 
enable him to walk erect and unshamed, in the presence of some per- 
sons, before whom he felt himself inferior. Having raised himself 
to this rank, having established his equality with class after class, 
of those with whom he would live well, he still finds certain others, 
before whom he cannot possess himself, because they have somewhat 
fairer, somewhat grander, somewhat purer, which extorts homage 



266 RALPH WALDO EMERSON 

o£ him. Is his ambition pure ? then will his laurels and his possessions 
seem worthless; instead of avoiding these men who make his fine 
gold dim, he will cast all behind him, and seek their society only, 
woo and embrace this his humiliation and mortification, until he 
shall know why his eye sinks, his voice is husky, and his brilliant 
talents are paralyzed in this presence. He is sure that the soul which 
gives the He to all things will tell none. His constitution will not 
mislead him. If it cannot carry itself as it ought, high and unmatch- 
able in the presence of any man, if the secret oracles whose whisper 
makes the sweetness and dignity of his life, do here withdraw and 
accompany him no longer, it is time to undervalue what he has 
valued, to dispossess himself of what he has acquired, and with 
Caesar to take in his hand the army, the empire, and Cleopatra, and 
say: "All these will I relinquish, if you will show me the fountains 
of the Nile." Dear to us are those who love us — the swift moments 
we spend with them are the compensation for a great deal of misery; 
they enlarge our life; but dearer are those who reject us as unworthy, 
for they add another life; they build a heaven before us, whereof we 
had not dreamed, and thereby supply to us new powers out of the 
recesses of the spirit, and urge us to new and unattempted perform- 
ances. 

As every man at heart wishes the best and not inferior society, 
wishes to be convicted of his error, and to come to himself, so he 
wishes that the same healing should not stop in his thought, but 
should penetrate his will or active power. The selfish man suffers 
more from his selfishness than he from whom that selfishness with- 
holds some important benefit. What he most wishes is to be lifted 
to some higher platform, that he may see beyond his present fear 
the transalpine good, so that his fear, his coldness, his custom may 
be broken up like fragments of ice, melted and carried away in 
the great stream of good will. Do you ask my aid? I also wish to 
be a benefactor. I wish more to be a benefactor and servant than you 
wish to be served by me, and surely the greatest good fortune that 
could befall me is precisely to be so moved by you that I should say, 
"Take me and all mine, and use me and mine freely to your ends!" 
for I could not say it, otherwise than because a great enlargement had 
come to my heart and mind, which made me superior to my fortunes. 



NEW ENGLAND REFORMERS 267 

Here we are paralyzed with fear; we hold on to our little properties, 
house and land, office and money, for the bread which they have in 
our experience yielded us, although we confess that our being does 
not flow through them. We desire to be made great, we desire to 
be touched with that fire which shall command this ice to stream, 
and make our existence a benefit. If, therefore, we start objections 
to your project, O friend of the slave, or friend of the poor, or of 
the race, understand well, that it is because we wish to drive you to 
drive us into your measures. We wish to hear ourselves confuted. 
We are haunted with a belief that you have a secret, which it would 
highliest advantage us to learn; we would force you to impart it to 
us, though it should bring us to prison, or to worse extremity. 

Nothing shall warp me from the belief that every man is a lover 
of truth. There is no pure lie, no pure malignity in nature. The 
entertainment of the proposition of depravity is the last profligacy 
and profanation. There is no skepticism, no atheism but that. Could 
it be received into common belief, suicide would unpeople the planet. 
It has had a name to live in some dogmatic theology, but each man's 
innocence and his real liking of his neighbor, have kept it a dead 
letter. I remember standing at the polls one day, and when the 
anger of the political contest gave a certain grimness to the faces 
of the independent electors, and a good man at my side looking on 
the people, remarked, "I am satisfied that the largest part of these 
men on either side mean to vote right." I suppose considerate ob- 
servers, looking at the masses of men in their blameless, and in their 
equivocal actions, will assent that in spite of selfishness and frivolity 
the general purpose in the great number of persons is fidelity. The 
reason why any one refuses his assent to your opinion, or his aid 
to your benevolent design, is in you; he refuses to accept you as a 
bringer of truth, because, though you think you have it, he feels 
that you have it not. You have not given him the authentic sign. 

If it were worth while to run into details this general doctrine of 
the latent but ever soliciting Spirit, it would be easy to adduce 
illustration in particulars of a man's equality to the church, of his 
equality to the state, and of his equality to every other man. It is 
yet in all men's memory, that a few years ago the liberal churches 
complained that the Calvinistic church denied to them the name 



200 RALPH WALDO EMERSON 

of Christian. I think the complaint was confession: a religious 
church would not complain. A religious man like Behmen, Fox, or 
Swedenborg, is not irritated by wanting the sanction of the church, 
but the church feels the accusation of his presence and belief. 

It only needs that a just man should walk in our streets, to make 
it appear how pitiful and inartificial a contrivance is our legislation. 
The man whose part is taken, and who does not wait for society 
in anything, has a power which society cannot choose but feel. The 
familiar experiment, called the hydrostatic paradox, in which a 
capillary column of water balances the ocean, is the symbol of the 
relation of one man to the whole family of men. The wise Dandini, 
on hearing the lives of Socrates, Pythagoras and Diogenes read, 
"judged them to be great men every way, excepting that they 
were too much subjected to the reverence of the laws, which to 
second and authorize, true virtue must abate very much of its origi- 
nal vigor." 

And as a man is equal to the church, and equal to the state, so he 
is equal to every other man. The disparities of power in men are 
superficial; and all frank and searching conversation, in which a 
man lays himself open to his brother, apprizes each of their radical 
unity. When two persons sit and converse in thoroughly good un- 
derstanding, the remark is sure to be made. See how we have dis- 
puted about words! Let a clear, apprehensive mind, such as every 
man knows among his friends, converse with the most commanding 
poetic genius, I think, it would appear that there was no inequahty 
such as men fancy between them; that a perfect understanding, a 
like receiving, a hke perceiving, abolished differences, and the poet 
would confess that his creative imagination gave him no deep ad- 
vantage, but only the superficial one, that he could express himself, 
and the other could not; that his advantage was a knack, which 
might impose on indolent men, but could not impose on lovers of 
truth; for they know the tax of talent, or, what a price of greatness 
the power of expression too often pays. I believe it is the conviction 
of the purest men that the net amount of man and man does not 
much vary. Each is incomparably superior to his companion in 
some faculty. His want of skill in other directions has added to his 
fitness for his own work. Each seems to have some compensation 



NEW ENGLAND REFORMERS 269 

yielded to him by his infirmity, and every hinderance operates as a 
concentration of his force. 

These and the Hke experiences intimate that man stands in strict 
connection with a higher fact never yet manifested. There is power 
over and behind us, and we are the channels of its communications. 
We seek to say thus and so, and over our head some spirit sits, 
which contradicts what we say. We would persuade our fellow 
to this or that; another self within our eyes dissuades him. That 
which we keep back, this reveals. In vain we compose our faces 
and our words; it holds uncontrollable communication with the 
enemy, and he answers civilly to us, but believes the spirit. We 
exclaim, "There's a traitor in the house!" but at last it appears that 
he is the true man, and I am the traitor. This open channel to the 
highest life is the first and last reality, so subtle, so quiet, yet so 
tenacious, that although I have never expressed the truth, and al- 
though I have never heard the expression of it from any other, I 
know that the whole truth is here for me. What if I cannot answer 
your questions? I am not pained that I cannot frame a reply to the 
question. What is the operation we call Providence? There lies the 
unspoken thing, present, omnipresent. Every time we converse, we 
seek to translate it into speech, but whether we hit or whether we 
miss we have the fact. Every discourse is an approximate answer; 
but it is of small consequence that we do not get it into verbs and 
nouns, while it abides for contemplation forever. 

If the auguries of the prophesying heart shall make themselves 
good in time, the man who shall be born, whose advent men and 
events prepare and foreshow, is one who shall enjoy his connec- 
tion with a higher life, with the man within man; shall destroy 
distrust by his trust, shall use his native but forgotten methods, shall 
not take counsel of flesh and blood, but shall rely on the Law alive 
and beautiful, which works over our heads and under our feet. 
Pitiless, it avails itself of our success, when we obey it, and of our 
ruin, when we contravene it. Men are all secret believers in it, else 
the word justice would have no meaning: they believe that the 
best is the true; that right is done at last; or chaos would come. It 
rewards actions after their nature and not after the design of the 
agent. "Work," it saith to man, "in every hour, paid or unpaid, see 



270 RALPH WALDO EMERSON 

only that thou work, and thou canst not escape the reward: whether 
thy work be fine or coarse, planting corn, or writing epics, so only 
it be honest work, done to thine own approbation, it shall earn a 
reward to these senses as well as to the thought: no matter, how 
often defeated, you are born to victory. The reward of a thing well 
done, is to have done it." 

As soon as a man is wonted to look beyond surfaces, and to see 
how this high will prevails without an exception or an interval, he 
settles himself into serenity. He can already rely on the laws of 
gravity, that every stone will fall where it is due; the good globe is 
faithful, and carries us securely through the celestial spaces, anxious 
or resigned; we need not interfere to help it on, and he will learn, 
one day, the mild lesson they teach, that our own orbit is all our 
task, and we need not assist the administration of the universe. Do 
not be so impatient to set the town right concerning the unfounded 
pretensions and the false reputation of certain men of standing. 
They are laboring harder to set the town right concerning them- 
selves, and will certainly succeed. Suppress for a few days your 
criticism on the insufficiency of this or that teacher or experimenter, 
and he will have demonstrated his insufficiency to all men's eyes. 
In like manner, let a man fall into the divine circuits, and he is 
enlarged. Obedience to his genius is the only liberating influence. 
We wish to escape from subjection, and a sense of inferiority — and 
we make self-denying ordinances, we drink water, we eat grass, we 
refuse the laws, we go to jail: it is all in vain; only by obedience to 
his genius; only by the freest activity in the way constitutional to 
him, does an angel seem to arise before a man, and lead him by the 
hand out of all the wards of the prison. 

That which befits us, embosomed in beauty and wonder as we are, 
is cheerfulness and courage, and the endeavor to realize our aspira- 
tions. The life of man is the true romance, which, when it is 
valiantly conducted, will yield the imagination a higher joy than any 
fiction. All around us, what powers are wrapped up under the 
coarse mattings of custom, and all wonder prevented. It is so 
wonderful to our neurologists that a man can see without his eyes, 
that it does not occur to them that it is just as wonderful that he 
should see with them; and that is ever the difference between the 



NEW ENGLAND REFORMERS T]l 

wise and the unwise; the latter wonders at what is unusual, the 
wise man wonders at the usual. Shall not the heart which has re- 
ceived so much, trust the Power by which it lives? May it not quit 
other leadings, and listen to the Soul that has guided it so gently, 
and taught it so much, secure that the future will be worthy of the 
past? 



WORSHIP 

(i860) 

This is he, who felled by foes, 

Sprung harmless up, refreshed by blows: 

He to captivity was sold, 

But him no prison-bars would hold: 

Though they sealed him in a rock. 

Mountain chains he can unlock: 

Thrown to lions for their meat. 

The crouching lion kissed his feet: 

Bound to the stake, no flames appalled, 

But arched o'er him an honoring vault. 

This is he men miscall Fate, 

Threading dark ways, arriving late. 

But ever coming in time to crown 

The truth, and hurl wrongdoers down. 

He is the oldest, and best known. 

More near than aught thou call'st thy own, 

Yet, greeted in another's eyes. 

Disconcerts with glad surprise. 

This is Jove, who, deaf to prayers, 

Floods with blessings unawares. 

Draw, if thou canst, the mystic line. 

Severing righdy his from thine, 

Which is human, which divine. 

SOME of my friends have complained, when the preceding 
papers were read, that we discussed Fate, Power, and Wealth, 
on too low a platform; gave too much line to the evil spirit 
of the times; too many cakes to Cerberus; that we ran Cud worth's 
risk of making, by excess of candor, the argument of atheism so 
strong, that he could not answer it. I have no fears of being forced 
in my own despite to play, as we say, the devil's attorney. I have 
no infirmity of faith; no belief that it is of much importance what 
I or any man may say: I am sure that a certain truth will be said 
through me, though I should be dumb, or though I should try to 

273 



274 RALPH WALDO EMERSON 

say the reverse. Nor do I fear skepticism for any good soul, A just 
thinker will allow full swing to his skepticism. I dip my pen in the 
blackest ink, because I am not afraid of falling into my inkpot. I 
have no sympathy with a poor man I knew, who, when suicides 
abounded, told me he dared not look at his razor. We are of 
different opinions at different hours, but we always may be said to 
be at heart on the side of truth. 

I see not why we should give ourselves such sanctified airs. If 
the Divine Providence has hid from men neither disease, nor de- 
formity, nor corrupt society, but has stated itself out in passions, in 
war, in trade, in the love of power and pleasure, in hunger and 
need, in tyrannies, literatures, and arts, — let us not be so nice that 
we cannot write these facts down coarsely as they stand, or doubt 
but there is a counter-statement as ponderous, which we can arrive 
at, and which, being put, will make all square. The solar system has 
no anxiety about its reputation, and the credit of truth and honesty 
is as safe; nor have I any fear that a skeptical bias can be given by 
leaning hard on the sides of fate, of practical power, or of trade, 
which the doctrine of Faith cannot downweigh. The strength of 
that principle is not measured in ounces and pounds: it tyrannizes 
at the centre of Nature. We may well give skepticism as much line 
as we can. The spirit will return, and fill us. It drives the drivers. 
It counterbalances any accumulations of power. 

"Heaven kindly gave our blood a moral flow." 

We are born loyal. The whole creation is made of hooks and eyes, 
of bitumen, of sticking-plaster, and whether your community is 
made in Jerusalem or in California, of saints or of wreckers, it 
coheres in a perfect ball. Men as naturally make a state, or a church, 
as caterpillars a web. If they were more refined, it would be less 
formal, it would be nervous, like that of the shakers, who, from 
long habit of thinking and feeling together, it is said, are affected 
in the same way, at the same time, to work and to play, and aa 
they go with perfect sympathy to their tasks in the field or shop, 
so are they inclined for a ride or a journey at the same instant, and 
the horses come up with the family carriage unbespoken to the 
door. 



WORSHIP 275 

We are born believing, A man bears beliefs, as a tree bears apples. 
A self-poise belongs to every particle; and a rectitude to every mind, 
and is the Nemesis and protector of every society. I and my neigh- 
bors have been bred in the notion, that, unless we came soon to 
some good church, — Calvinism, or Behmenism, or Romanism, or 
Mormonism, — there would be a universal thaw and dissolution. No 
Isaiah or Jeremy has arrived. Nothing can exceed the anarchy that 
has followed in our skies. The stern old faiths have all pulverized. 
'Tis a whole population of gendemen and ladies out in search of 
religions. 'Tis as flat anarchy in our ecclesiastic realms, as that which 
existed in Massachusetts, in the Revolution, or which prevails now 
on the slope of the Rocky Mountains or Pike's Peak. Yet we make 
shift to Uve. Men are loyal. Nature has self-poise in all her works; 
certain proportions in which oxygen and azote combine, and, not 
less a harmony in faculties, a fitness in the spring and the regu- 
lator. 

The decline of the influence of Calvin, or Fenelon, or Wesley, or 
Channing, need give us no uneasiness. The builder of heaven has 
not so ill constructed his creature as that the religion, that is, the 
public nature, should fall out: the public and the private element, 
like north and south, like inside and outside, like centrifugal and 
centripetal, adhere to every soul, and cannot be subdued, except the 
soul is dissipated. God builds his temple in the heart on the ruins 
of churches and religions. 

In the last chapters, we treated some particulars of the question of 
culture. But the whole state of man is a state of culture; and its 
flowering and completion may be described as Religion, or Worship. 
There is always some religion, some hope and fear extended into 
the invisible, — from the blind boding which nails a horseshoe to the 
mast or the threshold, up to the song of the Elders in the Apocalypse. 
But the religion cannot rise above the state of the votary. Heaven 
always bears some propordon to earth. The god of the cannibals 
will be a cannibal, of the crusaders a crusader, and of the merchants 
a merchant. In all ages, souls out of time, extraordinary, prophedc, 
are born, who are rather related to the system of the world, than to 
their particular age and locality. These announce absolute truths, 
which, with whatever reverence received, are speedily dragged down 



276 RALPH WALDO EMERSON 

into a savage interpretation. The interior tribes of our Indians, and 
some of the Pacific islanders, flog their gods, when things take an 
unfavorable turn. The Greek poets did not hesitate to let lose their 
petulant wit on their deities also. Laomedon, in his anger at Nep- 
tune and Apollo, who had built Troy for him, and demanded their 
price, does not hesitate to menace them that he will cut their ears 
oflF.^ Among our Norse forefathers. King Olaf's mode of converting 
Eyvind to Christianity was to put a pan of glowing coals on his 
belly, which burst asunder. "Wilt thou now, Eyvind, believe in 
Christ?" asks Olaf, in excellent faith. Another argument was an 
adder put into the mouth of the reluctant disciple Rand, who re- 
fused to believe. 

Christianity, in the romantic ages, signified European culture, — 
the grafted or meliorated tree in a crab forest. And to marry a 
pagan wife or husband, was to marry Beast, and voluntarily to take a 
step backwards towards the baboon. 

"Hengist had verament 
A daughter both fair and gent, 
But she was heathen Sarazine, 
And Vortigern for love fine 
Her took to fere and to wife, 
And was cursed in all his life; 
For he let Christian wed heathen, 
And mixed our blood as flesh and mathen."^ 

What Gothic mixtures the Christian creed drew from the pagan 
sources, Richard of Devizes's chronicle of Richard I.'s crusade, in 
the twelfth century, may show. King Richard taunts God with 
forsaking him: "O fie! O how unwilling should I be to forsake thee, 
in so forlorn and dreadful a position, were I thy lord and advocate, 
as thou art mine. In sooth, my standards will in future be despised, 
not through my fault, but through thine: in sooth, not through any 
cowardice of my warfare, art thou thyself, my king and my God 
conquered, this day, and not Richard thy vassal." The religion of 
the early English poets is anomalous, so devout and so blasphemous, 
in the same breath. Such is Chaucer's extraordinary confusion of 
heaven and earth in the picture of Dido. 

1 Iliad, Book xxi, 1. 455- ^ Moths or worms. 



WORSHIP 277 

"She was so fair, 
So young, so lusty, with her eyen glad. 
That if that God that heaven and earthe made 
Would have a love for beauty and goodness, 
And womanhede, truth, and seemliness. 
Whom should he loven but this lady sweet? 
There n' is no woman to him half so meet." 

With these grossnesses, we complacently compare our own taste 
and decorum. We think and speak with more temperance and 
gradation, — but is not indiflerentism as bad as superstition? 

We live in a transition period, when the old faiths which com- 
forted nations, and not only so, but made nations, seem to have 
spent their force. I do not find the religions of men at this moment 
very creditable to them, but either childish and insignificant, or 
unmanly and effeminating. The fatal trait is the divorce between 
religion and morality. Here are know-nothing religions, or churches 
that proscribe intellect; scortatory religions; slave-holding and slave- 
trading religions; and, even in the decent populations, idolatries 
wherein the whiteness of the ritual covers scarlet indulgence. The 
lover of the old religion complains that our contemporaries, scholars 
as well as merchants, succumb to a great despair, — have corrupted 
into a timorous conservatism, and believe in nothing. In our large 
cities, the population is godless, materialized, — no bond, no fellow- 
feeling, no enthusiasm. These are not men, but hungers, thirsts, 
fevers, and appetites walking. How is it people manage to live on, 
— so aimless as they are? After their peppercorn aims are gained, 
it seems as if the lime in their bones alone held them together, and 
not any worthy purpose. There is no faith in the intellectual, none 
in the moral universe. There is faith in chemistry, in meat, and 
wine, in wealth, in machinery, in the steam-engine, galvanic bat- 
tery, turbine-wheels, sewing machines, and in public opinion, but 
not in divine causes. A silent revolution has loosed the tension of 
the old religious sects, and, in place of the gravity and permanence 
of those societies of opinion, they run into freak and extravagance. 
In creeds never was such levity; witness the heathenisms in Chris- 
tianity, the periodic "revivals," the Millennium mathematics, the pea- 
cock ritualism, the retrogression to Popery, the maundering of Mor- 
mons, the squalor of Mesmerism, the deliration of rappings, the rat 



278 RALPH WALDO EMERSON 

and mouse revelation, thumps in table-drawers, and black art. The 
architecture, the music, the prayer, partake of the madness: the arts 
sink into shift and make-believe. Not knowing what to do, we ape 
our ancestors; the churches stagger backward to the mummeries of 
the dark ages. By the irresistible maturing of the general mind, the 
Christian traditions have lost their hold. The dogma of the mystic 
offices of Christ being dropped, and he standing on his genius as 
a moral teacher, 'tis impossible to maintain the old emphasis of his 
personality; and it recedes, as all persons must, before the sub- 
limity of the moral laws. From this change, and in the momentary 
absence of any religious genius that could offset the immense ma- 
terial activity, there is a feeling that reUgion is gone. When Paul 
Leroux offered his article "Dieu" to the conductor of a leading 
French journal, he replied, "La question de Dieu manque d'ac- 
tualite." 

In Italy, Mr. Gladstone said of the late King of Naples, "it has 
been a proverb, that he has erected the negation of God into a system 
of government." In this country, the like stupefaction was in the 
air, and the phrase "higher law" became a political jibe. What proof 
of infidelity, like the toleration and propagandism of slavery ? What, 
like the direction of education? What, like the facility of conver- 
sion.'' What, like the externality of churches that once sucked the 
roots of right and wrong, and now have perished away till they 
are a speck of whitewash on the wall? What proof of skepticism 
like the base rate at which the highest mental and moral gifts are 
held? Let a man attain the highest and broadest culture that any 
American has possessed, then let him die by sea-storm, railroad col- 
lision, or other accident, and all America will acquiesce that the 
best thing has happened to him; that, after the education has gone 
far, such is the expensiveness of America, that the best use to put a 
line person to, is, to drown him to save his board. 

Another scar of this skepticism is the distrust in human virtue. 
It is beheved by well-dressed proprietors that there is no more virtue 
than they possess; that the solid portion of society exist for the arts 
of comfort : that life is an affair to put somewhat between the upper 
and lower mandibles. How prompt the suggestion of a low motive! 
Certain patriots in England devoted themselves for years to creating 



WORSHIP 279 

a public opinion that should break down the corn-laws and establish 
free trade. "Well," says the man in the street, "Cobden got a stipend 
out of it." Kossuth fled hither across the ocean to try if he could 
rouse the New World to a sympathy with European liberty. "Aye," 
says New York, "he made a handsome thing of it, enough to make 
him comfortable for life." 

See what allowance vice finds in the respectable and well-condi- 
tioned class. If a pickpocket intrude into the society of gendemen, 
they exert what moral force they have, and he finds himself uncom- 
fortable, and glad to get away. But if an adventurer go through all 
the forms, procure himself to be elected to a post of trust, as of 
senator, or president, — though by the same arts as we detest in the 
house-thief, — the same gendemen who agree to discountenance the 
private rogue, will be forward to show civiHdes and marks of respect 
to the public one: and no amount of evidence of his crimes will 
prevent them giving him ovations, complimentary dinners, opening 
their own houses to him, and priding themselves on his acquaint- 
ance. We were not deceived by the professions of the private ad- 
venttu-er, — the louder he talked of his honor, the faster we counted 
our spoons; but we appeal to the sanctified preamble of the messages 
and proclamations of the pubhc sinner, as the proof of sincerity. It 
must be that they who pay this homage have said to themselves. On 
the whole, we don't know about this that you call honesty; a bird 
in the hand is better. 

Even well-disposed, good sort of people are touched with the 
same infidelity, and for brave, straightforward acdon, use half- 
measures and compromises. Forgetful that a little measure is a great 
error, forgetful that a wise mechanic uses a sharp tool, they go on 
choosing the dead men of routine. But the official men can in 
nowise help you in any quesdon of to-day, they deriving entirely 
from the old dead things. Only those can help in counsel or conduct 
who did not make a party pledge to defend this or that, but who 
were appointed by God Almighty, before they came into the world, 
to stand for this which they uphold. 

It has been charged that a want of sincerity in the leading men is 
a vice general throughout American society. But the multitude of 
the sick shall not make us deny the existence of health. In spite of 



28o RALPH WALDO EMERSON 

our imbecility and terrors, and "universal decay of religion," &c. &c., 
the moral sense reappears to-day with the same morning newness 
that has been from of old the fountain of beauty and strength. You 
say, there is no religion now. 'Tis like saying in rainy weather, 
there is no sun, when at that moment we are witnessing one of his 
superlative effects. The religion of the cultivated class now, to be 
sure, consists in an avoidance of acts and engagements which it was 
once their religion to assume. But this avoidance will yield spon- 
taneous forms in their due hour. There is a principle which is the 
basis of things, which all speech aims to say, and all action to evolve, 
a simple, quiet, undescribed, undescribable presence, dwelling very 
peacefully in us, our rightful lord: we are not to do, but to let do; 
not to work, but to be worked upon; and to this homage there is 
a consent of all thoughtful and just men in all ages and conditions. 
To this sentiment belong vast and sudden enlargements of power. 
'Tis remarkable that our faith in ecstasy consists with total inex- 
perience of it. It is the order of the world to educate with accuracy 
the senses and the understanding; and the enginery at work to 
draw out these powers in priority, no doubt, has its office. But we 
are never without a hint that these powers are mediate and servile, 
and that we are one day to deal with real being, — essences with 
essences. Even the fury of material activity has some results friendly 
to moral health. The energetic action of the times develops indi- 
vidualism, and the religious appear isolated. I esteem this a step 
in the right direction. Heaven deals with us on no representative 
system. Souls are not saved in bundles. The Spirit saith to the 
man, "How is it with thee? thee personally.? is it well? is it ill? 
For a great nature, it is a happiness to escape a religious training, 
— religion of character is so apt to be invaded. Religion must always 
be a crab fruit: it cannot be grafted and keep its wild beauty. "I 
have seen," said a traveller who had known the extremes of society, 
"I have seen human nature in all its forms, it is everywhere the 
same, but the wilder it is, the more virtuous." 

We say, the old forms of religion decay, and that a skepticism 
devastates the community. I do not think it can be cured or stayed 
by any modification of theologic creeds, much less by theologic dis- 
cipline. The cure for false theology is motherwit. Forget your 



WORSHIP 281 

books and traditions, and obey your moral perceptions at this hour. 
That which is signified by the words "moral" and "spiritual," is a 
lasting essence, and, with whatever illusions we have loaded them, 
will certainly bring back the words, age after age, to their ancient 
meaning. I know no words that mean so much. In our definitions, 
we grope after the spiritual by describing it as invisible. The true 
meaning of spiritual is real; that law which executes itself, which 
works without means, and which cannot be conceived as not exist- 
ing. Men talk of "mere morality," — which is much as if one should 
say, "poor God, with nobody to help him." I find the omnipresence 
and the almightiness in the reaction of every atom in Nature. I can 
best indicate by examples those reactions by which every part of 
Nature replies to the purpose of the actor, — beneficently to the good, 
penally to the bad. Let us replace sentimentahsm by realism, and 
dare to uncover those simple and terrible laws which, be they seen 
or unseen, pervade and govern. 

Every man takes care that his neighbor shall not cheat him. But 
a day comes when he begins to care that he do not cheat his neigh- 
bor. Then all goes well. He has changed his market-cart into a 
chariot of the sun. What a day dawns, when we have taken to heart 
the doctrine of faith! to prefer, as a better investment, being to 
doing; being to seeming; logic to rhythm and to display; the year 
to the day; the Hfe to the year; character to performance; — and have 
come to know, that justice will be done us; and, if our genius is slow, 
the term will be long. 

'Tis certain that worship stands in some commanding relation to 
the health of man, and to his highest powers, so as to be, in some 
manner, the source of intellect. All the great ages have been ages of 
belief. I mean, when there was any extraordinary power of per- 
formance, when great national movements began, when arts ap- 
pe^ared, when heroes existed, when poems were made, the human 
soul was in earnest, and had fixed its thoughts on spiritual verities, 
with as strict a grasp as that of the hands on the sword, or the 
pencil, or the trowel. It is true that genius takes its rise out of the 
mountains of rectitude; that all beauty and power which men covet, 
are somehow born out of that Alpine district; that any extraordinary 
degree of beauty in man or woman involves a moral charm. Thus, 



282 RALPH WALDO EMERSON 

I think, we very slowly admit in another man a higher degree of 
moral sentiment than our own, — a finer conscience, more impression- 
able, or, which marks minuter degrees; an ear to hear acuter notes 
of right and wrong, than we can. I think we listen suspiciously, 
and very slowly to any evidence to that point. But, once satisfied of 
such superiority, we set no Umit to our expectation of his genius. 
For such persons are nearer to the secret of God than others; are 
bathed by sweeter waters; they hear notices, they see visions, where 
others are vacant. We beUeve that hoHness confers a certain insight, 
because not by our private, but by our pubUc force, can we share and 
know the nature of things. 

There is an intimate interdependence of intellect and morals. 
Given the equality of two intellects, — which will form the most re- 
hable judgments, the good, or the bad hearted? "The heart has its 
arguments, with which the understanding is not acquainted." For 
the heart is at once aware of the state of health or disease, which is 
the controlling state, that is, of sanity or of insanity, prior, of course, 
to all question of the ingenuity of arguments, the amount of facts, 
or the elegance of rhetoric. So intimate is this alliance of mind and 
heart, that talent uniformly sinks with character. The bias of errors 
of principle carries away men into perilous courses, as soon as their 
will does not control their passion or talent. Hence the extraordinary 
blunders, and final wrong head, into which men spoiled by ambition 
usually fall. Hence the remedy for all blunders, the cure of bhnd- 
ness, the cure of crime, is love. "As much love, so much mind," 
said the Latin proverb. The superiority that has no superior; the 
redeemer and instructor of souls, as it is their primal essence, is 
love. 

The moral must be the measure of health. If your eye is on the 
eternal, your intellect will grow, and your opinions and actions will 
have a beauty which no learning or combined advantages of other 
men can rival. The moment of your loss of faith, and acceptance 
of the lucrative standard, will be marked in the pause, or solstice of 
genius, the sequent retrogression, and the inevitable loss of attraction 
to other minds. The vulgar are sensible of the change in you, and 
of your descent, though they clap you on the back, and congratulate 
you on your increased common sense. 



WORSHIP 283 

Our recent culture has been in natural science. We have learned 
the manners of the sun and of the moon, of the rivers and the rains, 
of the mineral and elemental kingdoms, of plants and animals. 
Man has learned to weigh the sun, and its weight neither loses nor 
gains. The path of a star, the moment of an ecUpse, can be deter- 
mined to the fraction of a second. Well, to him the book of history, 
the book of love, the lures of passion, and the commandments of 
duty are opened: and the next lesson taught, is, the continuation of 
the inflexible law of matter into the subtile kingdom of will, and 
of thought; that, if, in sidereal ages, gravity and projection keep 
their craft, and the ball never loses its way in its wild path through 
space, — a secreter gravitation, a secreter projection, rule not less 
tyrannically in human history, and keep the balance of power from 
age to age unbroken. For, though the new element of freedom and 
an individual has been admitted, yet the primordial atoms are pre- 
figured and predetermined to moral issues, are in search of justice, 
and ultimate right is done. Religion or worship is the atdtude of 
those who see this unity, intimacy, and sincerity; who see that, 
against all appearances, the nature of things works for truth and 
right forever. 

'Tis a short sight to limit our faith in laws to those of gravity, of 
chemistry, of botany, and so forth. Those laws do not stop where our 
eyes lose them, but push the same geometry and chemistry up into 
the invisible plane of social and rational life, so that, look where we 
will, in a boy's game, or in the strifes of races, a perfect reaction, a 
perpetual judgment keeps watch and ward. And this appears in a 
class of facts which concerns all men, within and above their creeds. 

Shallow men believe in luck, believe in circumstances: It was 
somebody's name, or he happened to be there at the time, or, it was 
so then, and another day it would have been otherwise. Strong men 
believe in cause and effect. The man was born to do it, and his 
father was born to be the father of him and of this deed, and, by 
looking narrowly, you shall see there was no luck in the matter, 
but it was all a problem in arithmetic, or an experiment in chem- 
istry. The curve of the flight of the moth is preordained, and all 
things go by number, rule, and weight. 

Skepticism is unbelief in cause and effect. A man does not see. 



284 RALPH WALDO EMERSON 

that, as he eats, so he thinks: as he deals, so he is, and so he appears; 
he does not see, that his son is the son o£ his thoughts and of his 
actions; that fortunes are not exceptions but fruits; that relation and 
connection are not somewhere and sometimes, but everywhere and 
always; no miscellany, no exemption, no anomaly, — ^but method, 
and an even web; and what comes out, that was put in. As we are, 
so we do; and as we do, so is it done to us; we are the builders of our 
fortunes; cant and lying and the attempt to secure a good which does 
not belong to us, are, once for all, balked and vain. But, in the 
human mind, this tie of fate is made alive. The law is the basis of 
the human mind. In us, it is inspiration; out there in Nature, we see 
its fatal strength. We call it the moral sentiment. 

We owe to the Hindoo Scriptures a definition of Law, which com- 
pares well with any in our Western books. "Law it is, which is 
without name, or color, or hands, or feet; which is smallest of the 
least, and largest of the large; all, and knowing all things; which 
hears without ears, sees without eyes, moves without feet, and seizes 
without hands." 

If any reader tax me with using vague and traditional phrases, let 
me suggest to him, by a few examples, what kind of a trust this is, 
and how real. Let me show him that the dice are loaded; that the 
colors are fast, because they are the native colors of the fleece; that the 
globe is a battery, because every atom is a magnet; and that the police 
and sincerity of the Universe are secured by God's delegating his 
divinity to every particle; that there is no room for hypocrisy, no 
margin for choice. 

The countryman leaving his native village, for the first time, and 
going abroad, finds all his habits broken up. In a new nation and 
language, his sect, as Quaker, or Lutheran, is lost. What! it is not 
then necessary to the order and existence of society ? He misses this, 
and the commanding eye of his neighborhood, which held him to 
decorum. This is the peril of New York, of New Orleans, of Lon- 
don, of Paris, to young men. But after a little experience, he makes 
the discovery that there are no large cities, — none large enough to 
hide in; that the censors of action are as numerous and as near in 
Paris, as in Littleton or Portland; that the gossip is as prompt and 
vengeful. There is no concealment, and, for each offence, a several 



WORSHIP 285 

vengeance; that, reaction, or nothing for nothing, or, things are as 
broad as they are long, is not a rule for Littleton or Portland, but for 
the Universe. 

We cannot spare the coarsest muniment of virtue. We are dis- 
gusted by gossip; yet it is of importance to keep the angels in their 
proprieties. The smallest fly will draw blood, and gossip is a weapon 
impossible to exclude from the privatest, highest, selectest. Nature 
created a police of many ranks. God has delegated himself to a mil- 
lion deputies. From these low external penalties, the scale ascends. 
Next come the resentments, the fears, which injustice calls out; then, 
the false relations in which the offender is put to other men; and the 
reaction of his fault on himself, in the solitude and devastation of his 
mind. 

You cannot hide any secret. If the artist succor his flagging spirits 
by opium or wine, his work will characterize itself as the effect of 
opium or wine. If you make a picture or a statue, it sets the beholder 
in that state of mind you had, when you made it. If you spend for 
show, on building, or gardening, or on pictures, or on equipages, it 
will so appear. We are all physiognomists and penetrators of char- 
acter, and things themselves are detective. If you follow the suburban 
fashion in building a sumptuous-looking house for a little money, it 
will appear to all eyes as a cheap dear house. There is no privacy 
that cannot be penetrated. No secret can be kept in the civilized 
world. Society is a masked ball, where every one hides his real char- 
acter, and reveals it by hiding. If a man wish to conceal anything he 
carries, those whom he meets know that he conceals somewhat, and 
usually know what he conceals. Is it otherwise if there be some belief 
or some purpose he would bury in his breast ? 'Tis as hard to hide as 
fire. He is a strong man who can hold down his opinion. A man 
cannot utter two or three sentences, without disclosing to intelligent 
ears precisely where he stands in life and thought, namely, whether 
in the kingdom of the senses and the understanding, or, in that of 
ideas and imagination, in the realm of intuitions and duty. People 
seem not to see that their opinion of the world is also a confession of 
character. We can only see what we are, and if we misbehave we 
suspect others. The fame of Shakspeare or of Voltaire, of Thomas a 
Kempis, or of Bonaparte, characterizes those who give it. As gas- 



286 RALPH WALDO EMERSON 

light is found to be the best nocturnal police, so the universe protects 
itself by pitiless publicity. 

Each must be armed — not necessarily with musket and pike. 
Happy, if, seeing these, he can feel that he has better muskets and 
pikes in his energy and constancy. To every creature is his own 
weapon, however skilfully concealed from himself, a good while. 
His work is sword and shield. Let him accuse none, let him injure 
none. The way to mend the bad world, is to create the right world. 
Here is a low political economy plotting to cut the throat of foreign 
competition, and establish our own; — excluding others by force, or 
making war on them; or, by cunning tariffs, giving preference to 
worse wares of ours. But the real and lasting victories are those of 
peace, and not of war. The way to conquer the foreign artisan, is, 
not to kill him, but to beat his work. And the Crystal Palaces and 
the World Fairs, with their committees and prizes on all kinds of 
industry, are the result of this feeling. The American workman who 
strikes ten blows Vi'ith his hammer, whilst the foreign workman only 
strikes one, is as really vanquishing that foreigner, as if the blows 
were aimed at and told on his person. I look on that man as happy, 
who, when there is question of success, looks into his work for a 
reply, not into the market, not into opinion, not into patronage. In 
every variety of human employment, in the mechanical and in the 
fine arts, in navigation, in farming, in legislating, there are among 
the numbers who do their task perfunctorily, as we say, or just to 
pass, and as badly as they dare, — there are the working-men on 
whom the burden of the business falls, — those who love work, and 
love to see it rightly done, who finish their task for its own sake; 
and the state and the world is happy, that has the most of such 
finishers. The world will always do justice at last to such finishers: 
it cannot otherwise. He who has acquired the ability, may wait 
securely the occasion of making it felt and appreciated, and know 
that it will not loiter. Men talk as if victory were something 
fortunate. Work is victory. Wherever work is done, victory is 
obtained. There is no chance, and no blanks. You want but one 
verdict: if you have your own, you are secure of the rest. And yet, if 
witnesses are wanted, witnesses are near. There was never a man 
born so wise or good, but one or more companions came into the 



WORSHIP 287 

world with him, who deUght in his faculty, and report it. I cannot 
see without awe, that no man thinks alone, and no man acts alone, 
but the divine assessors who came up with him into life, — now imder 
one disguise, now under another, — like a police in citizens' clothes, 
walk with him, step for step, through all the kingdom of time. 

This reaction, this sincerity is the property of all things. To make 
oiu" word or act sublime, we must make it real. It is our system that 
counts, not the single word or imsupported action. Use what lan- 
guage you will, you can never say anything but what you are. What 
I am, and what I think, is conveyed to you, in spite of my efforts 
to hold it back. What I am has been secretly conveyed from me to 
another, whilst I was vainly making up my mind to tell him it. He 
has heard from me what I never spoke. 

As men get on in life, they acquire a love for sincerity, and some- 
what less solicitude to be lulled or amused. In the progress of the 
character, there is an increasing faith in the moral sentiment, and a 
decreasing faith in propositions. Young people admire talents, and 
particular excellences. As we grow older, we value total powers 
and effects, as the spirit, or quality of the man. We have another 
sight, and a new standard; an insight which disregards what is 
done for the eye, and pierces to the doer; an ear which hears not 
what men say, but hears what they do not say. 

There was a wise, devout man who is called, in the Catholic 
Church, St. Philip Neri, of whom many anecdotes touching his 
discernment and benevolence are told at Naples and Rome. Among 
the nuns in a convent not far from Rome, one had appeared, who 
laid claim to certain rare gifts of inspiration and prophecy, and the 
abbess advised the Holy Father, at Rome, of the wonderful powers 
shown by her novice. The Pope did not well know what to make 
of these new claims, and Philip coming in from a journey, one day, 
he consulted him. Philip undertook to visit the nun, and ascertain 
her character. He threw himself on his mule, all travel-soiled as he 
was, and hastened through the mud and mire to the distant convent. 
He told the abbess the wishes of his Holiness, and begged her to 
summon the nun without delay. The nun was sent for, and, as soon 
as she came into the apartment, PhiUp stretched out his leg all 
bespattered with mud, and desired her to draw off his boots. The 



288 RALPH WALDO EMERSON 

young nun, who had become the object of much attention and 
respect, drew back with anger, and refused the office: PhiUp ran out 
of doors, mounted his mule, and returned instantly to the Pope; 
"Give yourself no uneasiness. Holy Father, any longer: here is no 
miracle, for here is no humility." 

We need not much mind what people please to say, but what they 
must say; what their natures say, though their busy, artful Yankee 
understandings try to hold back, and choke that word, and to 
articulate something different. If we will sit quiedy, — what they 
ought to say is said, with their will, or against their will. We do not 
care for you, let us pretend what we will: — we are always looking 
through you to the dim dictator behind you. Whilst your habit or 
whim chatters, we civilly and impatiendy wait until that wise 
superior shall speak again. Even children are not deceived by the 
false reasons which their parents give in answer to their questions, 
whether touching natural facts, or religion, or persons. When the 
parent, instead of thinking how it really is, puts them off with a 
traditional or a hypocriucal answer, the children perceive that it is 
traditional or hypocridcal. To a sound constitution the defect of 
another is at once manifest: and the marks of it are only concealed 
from us by our own dislocation. An anatomical observer remarks, 
that the sympathies of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis, tell at last on 
the face, and on all its features. Not only does our beauty waste, 
but it leaves word how it went to waste. Physiognomy and phre- 
nology are not new sciences, but declarations of the soul that it is 
aware of certain new sources of informadon. And now sciences of 
broader scope are starting up behind these. And so for ourselves, it 
is really of little importance what blunders in statement we make, 
so only we make no wilful departures from the truth. How a man's 
truth comes to mind, long after we have forgotten all his words! 
How it comes to us in silent hours, that truth is our only armor in 
all passages of life and death! Wit is cheap, and anger is cheap; 
but if you cannot argue or explain yourself to the other party, cleave 
to the truth against me, against thee, and you gain a station from 
which you cannot be dislodged. The other party will forget the 
words that you spoke, but the part you took continues to plead for 
you. 



WORSHIP 289 

Why should I hasten to solve every riddle w^hich life offers me? 
I am well assured that the Questioner, who brings me so many 
problems, will bring the answers also in due time. Very rich, very 
potent, very cheerful Giver that he is, he shall have it all his own 
way, for me. Why should I give up my thought, because I cannot 
answer an objection to it? Consider only, whether it remains in my 
life the same it was. That only which we have within, can we see 
without. If we meet no gods, it is because we harbor none. If there 
is grandeur in you, you will find grandeur in porters and sweeps. 
He only is rightly immortal, to whom all things are immortal. I 
have read somewhere, that none is accomplished, so long as any are 
incomplete; that the happiness of one cannot consist with the misery 
of any other. 

The Buddhists say, "No seed will die;" every seed will grow. 
Where is the service which can escape its remuneration? What is 
vulgar, and the essence of all vulgarity, but the avarice of reward? 
'Tis the difference of artisan and artist, of talent and genius, of 
sinner and saint. The man whose eyes are nailed not on the nature 
of his act, but on the wages, whether it be money, or office, or fame, — 
is almost equally low. He is great, whose eyes are opened to see that 
the reward of actions cannot be escaped, because he is transformed 
into his action, and taketh its nature, which bears its own fruit, like 
every other tree. A great man cannot be hindered of the effect of 
his act, because it is immediate. The genius of life is friendly to 
the noble, and in the dark brings them friends from far. Fear 
God, and where you go, men shall think they walk in hallowed 
cathedrals. 

And so I look on those sentiments which make the glory of the 
human being, love, humiHty, faith, as being also the intimacy of 
Divinity in the atoms; and that, as soon as the man is right, assur- 
ances and provisions emanate from the interior of his body and his 
mind; as, when flowers reach their ripeness, incense exhales from 
them, and as a beautiful atmosphere is generated from the planet 
by the averaged emanations from all its rocks and soils. 

Thus man is made equal to every event. He can face danger for 
the right. A poor, tender, painful body, he can run into flame or 
bullets or pestilence, with duty for his guide. He feels the insurance 



290 RALPH WALDO EMERSON 

of a just employment. I am not afraid of accident, as long as I am in 
my place. It is strange that superior persons should not feel that 
they have some better resistance against cholera, than avoiding 
green peas and salads. Life is hardly respectable, — is it ? if it has no 
generous guaranteeing task, no duties or affections, that constitute 
a necessity of existing. Every man's task is his Ufe-preserver. The 
conviction that his work is dear to God and cannot be spared, 
defends him. The lightning-rod that disarms the cloud of its threat 
is his body in its duty. A high aim reacts on the means, on the 
days, on the organs of the body. A high aim is curative, as w^ell as 
arnica. "Napoleon," says Goethe, "visited those sick of the plague, 
in order to prove that the man who could banish fear, could van- 
quish the plague also; and he was right. 'Tis incredible what force 
the will has in such cases: it penetrates the body, and puts it in a 
state of activity, which repels all hurtful influences; whilst fear 
invites them." 

It is related of William of Orange, that, whilst he was besieging 
a town on the continent, a gentleman sent to him on public business 
came to his camp, and learning that the King was before the walls, 
he ventured to go where he was. He found him directing the 
operation of his gunners, and, having explained his errand, and 
received his answer, the King said, "Do you not know, sir, that 
every moment you spend here is at the risk of your life?" "I run 
no more risk," replied the gentleman, "than your Majesty." "Yes," 
said the King, "but my duty brings me here, and yours does not." 
In a few minutes, a cannon-baU fell on the spot, and the gentleman 
was killed. 

Thus can the faithful student reverse all the warnings of his early 
instinct, under the guidance of a deeper instinct. He learns to 
welcome misfortune, learns that adversity is the prosperity of the 
great. He learns the greatness of humility. He shall work in the 
dark, work against failure, pain, and ill-will. If he is insulted, he 
can be insulted; all his affair is not to insult. Hafiz writes, 

"At the last day, men shall wear 
On their heads the dust, 
As ensign and as ornament 
Of their lowly trust." 



WORSHIP 291 

The moral equalizes all; enriches, empowers all. It is the coin 
which buys all, and which all find in their pocket. Under the whip 
of the driver, the slave shall feel his equaUty with saints and heroes. 
In the greatest destitution and calamity, it surprises man with a 
feeling of elasticity which makes nothing of loss. 

I recall some traits of a remarkable person whose life and discourse 
betrayed many inspirations of this sentiment. Benedict was always 
great in the present time. He had hoarded nothing from the past, 
neither in his cabinets, neither in his memory. He had no designs 
on the future, neither for what he should do to men, nor for what 
men should do for him. He said, "I am never beaten until I know 
that I am beaten. I meet powerful brutal people to whom I have no 
skill to reply. They think they have defeated me. It is so pubUshed 
in society, in the journals: I am defeated in this fashion, in all 
men's sight, perhaps on a dozen different lines. My ledger may show 
that I am in debt, cannot yet make my ends meet, and vanquish the 
enemy so. My race may not be prospering: we are sick, ugly, obscure, 
unpopular. My children may be worsted. I seem to fail in my 
friends and clients, too. That is to say, in all the encounters that 
have yet chanced, I have not been weaponed for that particular occa- 
sion, and have been historically beaten; and yet, I know, all the time, 
that I have never been beaten; have never yet fought, shall certainly 
fight, when my hour comes, and shall beat." "A man," says the 
Vishnu Sarma, "who having well compared his own strength or 
weakness with that of others, after all doth not know the difference, 
is easily overcome by his enemies." 

"I spent," he said, "ten months in the country. Thick-starred 
Orion was my only companion. Wherever a squirrel or a bee can 
go with security, I can go. I ate whatever was set before me, I 
touched ivy and dogwood. When I went abroad, I kept company 
with every man on the road, for I knew that my evil and my good 
did not come from these, but from the Spirit, whose servant I was. 
For I could not stoop to be a circumstance, as they did, who put their 
life into their fortune and their company. I would not degrade my- 
self by casting about in my memory for a thought, nor by waiting 
for one. If the thought come, I would give it entertainment. It 
should, as it ought, go into my hands and feet; but if it come not 



292 RALPH WALDO EMERSON 

spontaneously, it comes not rightly at all. If it can spare me, I am 
sure I can spare it. It shall be the same with my friends. I will never 
woo the loveliest. I will not ask any friendship or favor. When I 
come to my own, we shall both know it. Nothing will be to be 
asked or to be granted." Benedict went out to seek his friend, and 
met him on the way; but he expressed no surprise at any coinci- 
dences. On the other hand, if he called at the door of his friend, and 
he was not at home, he did not go again; concluding that he had 
misinterpreted the intimations. 

He had the whim not to make an apology to the same individual 
whom he had wronged. For this, he said, was a piece of personal 
vanity; but he would correct his conduct in that respect in which he 
had faulted, to the next person he should meet. Thus, he said, 
universal justice was satisfied. 

Mira came to ask what she should do with the poor Genesee 
woman who had hired herself to work for her, at a shilling a day, 
and, now sickening, was like to be bedridden on her hands. Should 
she keep her, or should she dismiss her? But Benedict said, "Why 
ask.? One thing will clear itself as the thing to be done, and not 
another, when the hour comes. Is it a question, whether to put her 
into the street? Just as much whether to thrust the little Jenny on 
your arm into the street. The milk and meal you give the beggar, 
will fatten Jenny. Thrust the woman out, and you thrust your babe 
out of doors, whether it so seem to you or not." 

In the Shakers, so called, I find one piece of belief, in the doctrine 
which they faithfully hold, that encourages them to open their doors 
to every wayfaring man who proposes to come among them; for, 
they say, the Spirit will presently manifest to the man himself, and 
to the society, what manner of person he is, and whether he belongs 
among them. They do not receive him, they do not reject him. And 
not in vain have they worn their clay coat, and drudged in their 
fields, and shuffled in their Bruin dance, from year to year, if they 
have truly learned thus much wisdom. 

Honor him whose life is perpetual victory; him, who, by sympathy 
with the invisible and real, finds support in labor, instead of praise; 
who does not shine, and would rather not. With eyes open, he makes 
the choice of virtue, which outrages the virtuous; of religion, which 



WORSHIP 293 

churches stop their discords to burn and exterminate; for the highest 
virtue is always against the law. 

Miracle comes to the miraculous, not to the arithmetician. Talent 
and success interest me but moderately. The great class, they who 
affect our imagination, the men who could not make their hands 
meet around their objects, the rapt, the lost, the fools of ideas, — 
they suggest what they cannot execute. They speak to the ages, 
and are heard from afar. The Spirit does not love cripples and mal- 
formations. If there ever was a good man, be certain, there was 
another, and will be more. 

And so in relation to that future hour, that spectre clothed with 
beauty at our curtain by night, at our table by day, — the apprehen- 
sion, the assurance of a coming change. The race of mankind have 
always offered at least this implied thanks for the gift of existence, — 
namely, the terror of its being taken away; the insatiable curiosity 
and appetite for its continuation. The whole revelation that is vouch- 
safed us, is, the gentle trust, which, in our experience we find, will 
cover also with flowers the slopes of this chasm. 

Of immortality, the soul, when well employed, is incurious. It is 
so well, that it is sure it will be well. It asks no questions of the 
Supreme Power. The son of Antiochus asked his father, when he 
would join battle? "Dost thou fear," replied the King, "that thou 
only in all the army wilt not hear the trumpet?" 'Tis a higher thing 
to confide, that, if it is best we should Uve, we shall live, — 'tis higher 
to have this conviction, than to have the lease of indefinite centuries 
and millenniums and sons. Higher than the question of our dura- 
tion is the question of our deserving. Immortality will come to such 
as are fit for it, and he who would be a great soul in future, must be 
a great soul now. It is a doctrine too great to rest on any legend, 
that is, on any man's experience but our own. It must be proved, 
if at all, from our own activity and designs, which imply an inter- 
minable future for their play. 

What is called religion effeminates and demoralizes. Such as you 
are, the gods themselves could not help you. Men are too often unfit 
to live, from their obvious inequality to their own necessities, or, 
they suffer from politics, or bad neighbors, or from sickness, and 
they would gladly know that they were to be dismissed from the 



294 RALPH WALDO EMERSON 

duties of life. But the wise instinct asks, "How will death help 
them?" These are not dismissed when they die. You shall not wish 
for death out of pusillanimity. The weight of the Universe is pressed 
down on the shoulders of each moral agent to hold him to his task. 
The only path of escape known in all the worlds of God is per- 
formance. You must do your work, before you shall be released. 
And as far as it is a question of fact respecting the government of the 
Universe, Marcus Antoninus summed the whole in a word, "It is 
pleasant to die, if there be gods; and sad to live, if there be none." 

And so I think that the last lesson of life, the choral song which 
rises from all elements and all angels, is, a voluntary obedience, a 
necessitated freedom. Man is made of the same atoms as the world 
is, he shares the same impressions, predispositions, and destiny. 
When his mind is illuminated, when his heart is kind, he throws 
himself joyfully into the sublime order, and does, with knowledge, 
what the stones do by structure. The religion which is to guide and 
fulfil the present and coming ages, whatever else it be, must be intel- 
lectual. The scientific mind must have a faith which is science. 
"There are two things," said Mahomet, "which I abhor, the learned 
in his infidelities, and the fool in his devotions." Our times are 
impatient of both, and specially of the last. Let us have nothing now 
which is not its own evidence. There is surely enough for the heart 
and imagination in the religion itself. Let us not be pestered with 
assertions and half-truths, with emotions and snuffle. 

There will be a new church founded on moral science, at first cold 
and naked, a babe in a manger again, the algebra and mathematics 
of ethical law, the church of men to come, without shawms or 
psaltery, or sackbut; but it will have heaven and earth for its beams 
and rafters; science for symbol and illustration; it will fast enough 
gather beauty, music, picture, poetry. Was never stoicism so stern 
and exigent as this shall be. It shall send man home to his central 
solitude, shame these social, supplicating manners, and make him 
know that much of the time he must have himself to his friend. 
He shall expect no cooperation, he shall walk with no companion. 
The nameless Thought, the nameless Power, the superpersonal 
Heart, — he shall repose alone on that. He needs only his own verdict. 
No good fame can help, no bad fame can hurt him. The Laws 



WORSHIP 295 

are his consolers, the good Laws themselves are aHve, they know if 
he have kept them, they animate him with the leading of great duty, 
and an endless horizon. Honor and fortune exist to him who always 
recognizes the neighborhood of the great, always feels himself in the 
presence of high causes. 



BEAUTY 

(i860) 

THE spiral tendency of vegetation infects education also. Our 
books approach very slowly the things we most wish to 
know. What a parade we make of our science, and how far 
off, and at arm's length, it is from its objects! Our botany is all 
names, not powers: poets and romancers talk of herbs of grace 
and healing; but what does the botanist know of the virtues of his 
weeds? The geologist lays bare the strata, and can tell them all on 
his fingers: but does he know what effect passes into the man who 
builds his house in them? What effect on the race that inhabits a 
granite shelf? what on the inhabitants of marl and of alluvium? 

We should go to the ornithologist with a new feeling, if he could 
teach us what the social birds say, when they sit in the autumn coun- 
cil, talking together in the trees. The want of sympathy makes his 
record a dull dictionary. His result is a dead bird. The bird is not 
in its ounces and inches, but in its relations to Nature; and the skin 
or skeleton you show me, is no more a heron, than a heap of ashes 
or a bottle of gases into which his body has been reduced, is Dante 
or Washington. The naturalist is led from the road by the whole 
distance of his fancied advance. The boy had juster views when he 
gazed at the shells on the beach, or the flowers in the meadow, 
unable to call them by their names, than the man in the pride of 
his nomenclature. Astrology interested us, for it tied man to the 
system. Instead of an isolated beggar, the farthest star felt him, and 
he felt the star. However rash and however falsified by pretenders 
and traders in it, the hint was true and divine, the soul's avowal of 
its large relations, and, that climate, century, remote natures, as 
well as near, are part of its biography. Chemistry takes to pieces, 
but it does not construct. Alchemy which sought to transmute one 
element into another, to prolong life, to arm with power, — that was 
in the right direction. All our science lacks a human side. The ten- 

297 



298 RALPH WALDO EMERSON 

ant is more than the house. Bugs and stamens and spores, on which 
we lavish so many years, are not finahties, and man, when his pow- 
ers unfold in order, will take Nature along with him, and emit light 
into all her recesses. The human heart concerns us more than the 
pouring into microscopes, and is larger than can be measured by 
the pompous figures of the astronomer. 

We are just so frivolous and skeptical. Men hold themselves cheap 
and vile: and yet a man is a fagot of thunderbolts. All the elements 
pour through his system: he is the flood of the flood, and fire of 
the fire; he feels the antipodes and the pole, as drops of his blood: 
they are the extension of his personality. His duties are measured 
by that instrument he is; and a right and perfect man would be felt 
to the centre of the Copernican system. 'Tis curious that we only 
believe as deep as we live. We do not think heroes can exert any 
more awful power than that surface-play which amuses us. A deep 
man believes in miracles, waits for them, believes in magic, believes 
that the orator will decompose his adversary; believes that the evil 
eye can wither, that the heart's blessing can heal; that love can exalt 
talent; can overcome all odds. From a great heart secret magnetisms 
flow incessantly to draw great events. But we prize very humble 
utilities, a prudent husband, a good son, a voter, a citizen, and dep- 
recate any romance of character; and perhaps reckon only his money 
value, — his intellect, his affection, as a sort of bill of exchange, easily 
convertible into fine chambers, pictures, music and wine. 

The motive of science was the extension of man, on all sides, into 
Nature, till his hands should touch the stars, his eyes see through 
the earth, his ears understand the language of beast and bird, and the 
sense of the wind; and, through his sympathy, heaven and earth 
should talk with him. But that is not our science. These geologies, 
chemistries, astronomies, seem to make wise, but they leave us where 
they found us. The invention is of use to the inventor, of question- 
able help to any other. The formulas of science are like the papers 
in your pocket-book, of no value to any but the owner. Science 
in England, in America, is jealous of theory, hates the name of love 
and moral purpose. There's a revenge for this inhumanity. What 
manner of man does science make? The boy is not attracted. He 
says, I do not wish to be such a kind of man as my professor is. 



BEAUTY 299 

The collector has dried all the plants in his herbal, but he has lost 
weight and humor. He has got all snakes and lizards in his phials, 
but science has done for him also, and has put the man into a bottle. 
Our reUance on the physician is a kind o£ despair of oiu-selves. The 
clergy have bronchitis, which does not seem a certificate of spiritual 
health. Macready thought it came of the falsetto of their voicing. 
An Indian prince, Tisso, one day riding in the forest saw a herd of 
elk sporting. "See how happy," he said, "these browsing elks are! 
Why should not priests, lodged and fed comfortably in the temples, 
also amuse themselves?" Returning home, he imparted this reflec- 
tion to the king. The king, on the next day, conferred the sover- 
eignty on him, saying, "Prince, administer this empire for seven 
days: at the termination of that period, I shall put thee to death." 
At the end of the seventh day, the king inquired "From what cause 
hast thou become so emaciated?" He answered, "From the horror 
of death." The monarch rejoined: "Live, my child, and be wise. 
Thou hast ceased to take recreation, saying to thyself, in seven days 
I shall be put to death. These priests in the temple incessantly medi- 
tate on death; how can they enter into healthful diversions?" But 
the men of science or the doctors or the clergy are not victims of 
their pursuits, more than others. The miller, the lawyer, and the 
merchant, dedicate themselves to their own details, and do not 
come out men of more force. Have they divination, grand aims, 
hospitality of soul, and the equality to any event, which we 
demand in man, or only the reactions of the mill, of the wares, of the 
chicane? 

No object really interests us but man, and in man only his superi- 
orities; and, though we are aware of a perfect law in Nature, it has 
fascination for us only through its relation to him, or, as it is rooted 
in the mind. At the birth of Winckelmann, more than a hundred 
years ago, side by side with this arid, departmental, post mortem 
science, rose an enthusiasm in the study of Beauty; and perhaps 
some sparks from it may yet light a conflagration in the other; 
Knowledge of men, knowledge of manners, the power of form, and 
our sensibility to personal influence, never go out of fashion. These 
are facts of a science which we study without book, whose teachers 
and subjects are always near us. 



300 RALPH WALDO EMERSON 

So inveterate is our habit of criticism, that much of our knowledge 
in this direction belongs to the chapter of pathology. The crowd in 
the street oftener furnishes degradations than angels or redeemers: 
but they all prove the transparency. Every spirit makes its house; 
and we can give a shrewd guess from the house to the inhabitant. 
But not less does Nature furnish us with every sign of grace and 
goodness. The delicious faces of children, the beauty of school-girls, 
"the sweet seriousness of sixteen," the lofty air of well-born, well- 
bred boys, the passionate histories in the looks and manners of youth 
and early manhood, and the varied power in all that well-known 
company that escort us through life, — we know how these forms 
thrill, paralyze, provoke, inspire and enlarge us. 

Beauty is the form under which the intellect prefers to study the 
world. All privilege is that of beauty; for there are many beauties; 
as, of general nature, of the human face and form, of manners, of 
brain, or method, moral beauty, or beauty of the soul. 

The ancients believed that a genius or demon took possession at 
birth of each mortal, to guide him; that these genii were sometimes 
seen as a flame of fire partly immersed in the bodies which they 
governed; — on an evil man, resting on his head; in a good man, 
mixed with his substance. They thought the same genius, at the 
death of its ward, entered a new-born child, and they pretended to 
guess the pilot, by the sailing of the ship. We recognize obscurely 
the same fact, though we give it our own names. We say, that 
every man is entitled to be valued by his best moment. We measure 
our friends so. We know, they have intervals of folly, whereof we 
take no heed, but wait the reappearings of the genius, which are 
sure and beautiful. On the other side, everybody knows people who 
appear beridden, and who, with all degrees of ability, never impress 
us with the air of free agency. They know it too, and peep with 
their eyes to see if you detect their sad plight. We fancy, could we 
pronounce the solving word, and disenchant them, the cloud would 
roll up, the little rider would be discovered and unseated, and they 
would regain their freedom. The remedy seems never to be far 
off, since the first step into thought lifts this mountain of necessity. 
Thought is the pent air-ball which can rive the planet, and the 



BEAUTY 301 

beauty which certain objects have for him, is the friendly fire which 
expands the thought, and acquaints the prisoner that hberty and 
power await him. 

The question of Beauty takes us out of surfaces, to thinking of 
the foundations of things. Goethe said, "The beautiful is a mani- 
festation of secret laws of Nature, which, but for this appearance, 
had been forever concealed from us." And the working of this 
deep instinct makes all the excitement — much of it superficial and 
absurd enough — about works of art, which leads armies of vain 
travellers every year to Italy, Greece and Egypt. Every man values 
every acquisition he makes in the science of beauty, above his pos- 
sessions. The most useful man in the most useful world, so long as 
only commodity was served, would remain unsatisfied. But, as fast 
as he sees beauty, life acquires a very high value. 

I am warned by the ill fate of many philosophers not to attempt 
a definition of Beauty. I will rather enumerate a few of its qualities. 
We ascribe beauty to that which is simple; which has no superfluous 
parts; which exactly answers its end; which stands related to all 
things; which is the mean of many extremes. It is the most enduring 
quality, and the most ascending quality. We say, love is blind, and 
the figure of Cupid is drawn with a bandage round his eyes. Blind: 
— yes, because he does not see what he does not like; but the sharpest- 
sighted hunter in the universe is Love, for finding what he seeks, 
and only that; and the mythologists tell us, that Vulcan was painted 
lame, and Cupid blind, to call attention to the fact, that one was 
all limbs, and the other, all eyes. In the true mythology. Love is an 
immortal child, and Beauty leads him as a guide: nor can we 
express a deeper sense than when we say, Beauty is the pilot of the 
young soul. 

Beyond their sensuous delight, the forms and colors of Nature 
have a new charm for us in our perception, that not one ornament 
was added for ornament, but is a sign of some better health, or more 
excellent action. Elegance of form in bird or beast, or in the human 
figure, marks some excellence of structure: or beauty is only an in- 
vitation from what belongs to us. 'Tis a law of botany, that in plants, 
the same virtues follow the same forms. It is a rule of largest appli- 



302 RALPH WALDO EMERSON 

cation, true in a plant, true in a loaf of bread, that in tHe construction 
of any fabric or organism, any real increase of fitness to its end is 
an increase of beauty. 

The lesson taught by the study of Greek and of Gothic art, of 
antique and of Pre-Raphaelite painting, was worth all the research, 
— namely, that all beauty must be organic; that outside embeUish- 
ment is deformity. It is the soundness of the bones that ultimates 
itself in a peach-bloom complexion: health of constitution that makes 
the sparkle and the power of the eye. 'Tis the adjustment of the 
size and of the joining of the sockets of the skeleton, that gives grace 
of outline and the finer grace of movement. The cat and the deer 
cannot move or sit inelegantly. The dancing-master can never teach 
a badly built man to walk well. The tint of the flower proceeds from 
its root, and the lustres of the sea-shell begin with its existence. 
Hence our taste in building rejects paint, and all shifts, and shows 
the original grain of the wood: refuses pilasters and columns that 
support nothing, and allows the real supporters of the house honestly 
to show themselves. Every necessary or organic action pleases the 
beholder. A man leading a horse to water, a farmer sowing seed, 
the labors of haymakers in the field, the carpenter building a ship, 
the smith at his forge, or, whatever useful labor, is becoming to the 
wise eye. But if it is done to be seen, it is mean. How beautiful are 
ships on the sea! but ships in the theatre, — or ships kept for pictur- 
esque effect on Virginia Water, by George IV., and men hired to 
stand in fitting costumes at a penny an hour! — What a dijEference 
in effect between a battalion of troops marching to action, and one 
of our independent companies on a holiday ! In the midst of a mili- 
tary show, and a festal procession gay with banners, I saw a boy 
seize an old tin pan that lay rusting under a wall, and poising it on 
the top of a stick, he set it turning, and made it describe the most 
elegant imaginable curves, and drew away attention from the deco- 
rated procession by this startling beauty. 

Another text from the mythologists. The Greeks fabled that 
Venus was born of the foam of the sea. Nothing interests us which 
is stark or bounded, but only what streams with Hfe, what is in att 
or endeavor to reach somewhat beyond. The pleasure a palace or 
a temple gives the eye, is, that an order and method has been com- 



BEAUTY 303 

municated to stones, so that they speak and geometrize, become 
tender or sublime with expression. Beauty is the moment of transi- 
tion, as if the form were just ready to flow into other forms. Any 
fixedness, heaping, or concentration on one feature, — a long nose, a 
sharp chin, a hump-back, — is the reverse of the flowing, and there- 
fore deformed. Beautiful as is the symmetry of any form, if the form 
can move, we seek a more excellent symmetry. The interruption of 
equilibrium stimulates the eye to desire the restoration of symmetry, 
and to watch the steps through which it is attained. This is the 
charm of running water, sea-waves, the flight of birds, and the loco- 
motion of animals. This is the theory of dancing, to recover con- 
tinually in changes the lost equilibrium, not by abrupt and angular, 
but by gradual and curving movements. I have been told by persons 
of experience in matters of taste, that the fashions follow a law of 
gradation, and are never arbitrary. The new mode is always only 
a step onward in the same direction as the last mode; and a culti- 
vated eye is prepared for and predicts the new fashion. This fact 
suggests the reason of all mistakes and offence in our own modes. 
It is necessary in music, when you strike a discord, to let down the 
ear by an intermediate note or two to the accord again: and many 
a good experiment, born of good sense, and destined to succeed, 
fails, only because it is offensively sudden. I suppose, the Parisian 
milliner who dresses the world from her imperious boudoir will 
know how to reconcile the Bloomer costume to the eye of mankind, 
and make it triumphant over Punch himself, by interposing the 
just gradations. I need not say, how wide the same law ranges; and 
how much it can be hoped to effect. All that is a little harshly 
claimed by progressive parties, may easily come to be conceded with- 
out question, if this rule be observed. Thus the circumstances may be 
easily imagined, in which woman may speak, vote, argue causes, 
legislate, and drive a coach, and all the most naturally in the world, 
if only it come by degrees. To this streaming or flowing belongs the 
beauty that all circular movement has; as, the circulation of waters, 
the circulation of the blood, the periodical motion of planets, the 
annual wave of vegetation, the action and reaction of Nature: and, 
if we follow it out, this demand in our thought for an ever-onward 
action, is the argument for the immortality. 



304 RALPH WALDO EMERSON 

One more text from the mythologists is to the same purpose, — 
Beauty rides on a lion. Beauty rests on necessities. The hne o£ beauty 
is the result of perfect economy. The cell of the bee is built at that 
angle which gives the most strength with the least wax; the bone or 
the quill of the bird gives the most alar strength, with the least 
weight. "It is the purgation of superfluities," said Michel Angelo. 
There is not a particle to spare in natural structures. There is a 
compelling reason in the uses of the plant, for every novelty of color 
or form: and our art saves material, by more skilful arrangement, 
and reaches beauty by taking every superfluous ounce that can be 
spared from a wall, and keeping all its strength in the poetry of 
columns. In rhetoric, this art of omission is a chief secret of power, 
and, in general, it is proof of high culture, to say the greatest matters 
in the simplest way. 

Veracity first of all, and forever. Rien de beau que le vrai. In all 
design, art lies in making your object prominent, but there is a prior 
art in choosing objects that are prominent. The fine arts have noth- 
ing casual, but spring from the instincts of the nations that created 
them. 

Beauty is the quality which makes to endure. In a house that I 
know, I have noticed a block of spermaceti lying about closets and 
mantel-pieces, for twenty years together, simply because the tallow- 
man gave it the form of a rabbit; and, I suppose, it may continue 
to be lugged about unchanged for a century. Let an artist scrawl 
a few lines or figures on the back of a letter, and that scrap of paper 
is rescued from danger, is put in portfolio, is framed and glazed, 
and, in proportion to the beauty of the lines drawn, will be kept for 
centuries. Burns writes a copy of verses, and sends them to a news- 
paper, and the human race take charge of them that they shall not 
perish. 

As the flute is heard farther than the cart, see how surely a beauti- 
ful form strikes the fancy of men, and is copied and reproduced 
without end. How many copies are there of the Belvedere Apollo, 
the Venus, the Psyche, the Warwick Vase, the Parthenon, and the 
Temple of Vesta? These are objects of tenderness to all. In our 
cities, an ugly building is soon removed, and is never repeated, but 
any beautiful building is copied and improved upon, so that all 



BEAUTY 305 

masons and carpenters work to repeat and preserve the agreeable 
forms, whilst the ugly ones die out. 

The felicities of design in art, or in works of Nature, are shadows 
or forerunners of that beauty which reaches its perfection in the 
human form. All men are its lovers. Wherever it goes, it creates 
joy and hilarity, and everything is permitted to it. It reaches its 
height in woman. "To Eve," say the Mahometans, "God gave two- 
thirds of all beauty." A beautiful woman is a practical poet, taming 
her savage mate, planting tenderness, hope, and eloquence, in all 
whom she approaches. Some favors of condition must go with it, 
since a certain serenity is essential, but we love its reproofs and 
superiorities. Nature wishes that woman should attract man, yet she 
often cunningly moulds into her face a little sarcasm, which seems 
to say, "Yes, I am willing to attract, but to attract a little better 
kind of a man than any I yet behold." French memoires of the 
fifteenth century celebrate the name of Pauline de Viguiere, a virtu- 
ous and accomplished maiden, who so fired the enthusiasm of her 
contemporaries, by her enchanting form, that the citizens of her 
native city of Toulouse obtained the aid of the civil authorities to 
compel her to appear publicly on the balcony at least twice a week, 
and, as often as she showed herself, the crowd was dangerous to 
life. Not less, in England, in the last century, was the fame of the 
Gunnings, of whom, Elizabeth married the Duke of Hamilton; 
and Maria, the Earl of Coventry. Walpole says, "the concourse was 
so great, when the Duchess of Hamilton was presented at court, on 
Friday, that even the noble crowd in the drawing-room clambered 
on chairs and tables to look at her. There are mobs at their doors 
to see them get into their chairs; and people go early to get places 
at the theatres, when it is known they will be there." "Such crowds," 
he adds, elsewhere, "flock to see the Duchess of Hamilton, that seven 
hundred people sat up all night, in and about an inn, in Yorkshire, 
to see her get into her post-chaise next morning." 

But why need we console ourselves with the fames of Helen of 
Argos, or Corinna, or Pauline of Toulouse, or the Duchess of Hamil- 
ton? We all know this magic very well, or can divine it. It does 
not hurt weak eyes to look into beautiful eyes never so long. Women 
stand related to beautiful Nature around us, and the enamored youth 



306 RALPH WALDO EMERSON 

mixes their form with moon and stars, with woods and waters, and 
the pomp of summer. They heal us of awkwardness by their words 
and looks. We observe their intellectual influence on the most serious 
student. They refine and clear his mind; teach him to put a pleasing 
method into what is dry and difficult. We talk to them, and wish 
to be listened to; we fear to fatigue them, and acquire a faciUty of 
expression which passes from conversation into habit of style. 

That Beauty is the normal state, is shown by the perpetual effort 
of Nature to attain it. Mirabeau had an ugly face on a handsome 
ground; and we see faces every day which have a good type, but 
have been marred in the casting: a proof that we are all entitled to 
beauty, should have been beautiful, if our ancestors had kept the 
laws, — as every lily and every rose is well. But our bodies do not 
fit us, but caricature and satirize us. Thus, short legs, which con- 
strain us to short, mincing steps, are a kind of personal insult and 
contumely to the owner; and long stilts, again, put him at per- 
petual disadvantage, and force him to stoop to the general level 
of mankind. Martial ridicules a gentleman of his day whose coun- 
tenance resembled the face of a swimmer seen under water. Saadi 
describes a schoolmaster "so ugly and crabbed, that a sight of him 
would derange the ecstasies of the orthodox." Faces are rarely true 
to any ideal type, but are a record in sculpture of a thousand anec- 
dotes of whim and folly. Portrait painters say that most faces and 
forms are irregular and unsymmetrical; have one eye blue, and one 
gray; the nose not straight; and one shoulder higher than another; 
the hair unequally distributed, etc. The man is physically as well 
as metaphysically a thing of shreds and patches, borrowed unequally 
from good and bad ancestors, and a misfit from the start. 

A beautiful person, among the Greeks, was thought to betray by 
this sign some secret favor of the immortal gods: and we can pardon 
pride, when a woman possesses such a figure, that wherever she 
stands, or moves, or leaves a shadow on the wall, or sits for a por- 
trait to the artist, she confers a favor on the world. And yet — it is 
not beauty that inspires the deepest passion. Beauty without grace 
is the hook without the bait. Beauty, without expression, tires. Abbe 
Menage said of the President Le Bailleul, "that he was fit for noth- 
ing but to sit for his portrait." A Greek epigram intimates that 



BEAUTY 307 

the force of love is not shown by the courting of beauty, but when 
the like desire is inflamed for one who is ill-favored. And petulant 
old gentlemen, who have chanced to suffer some intolerable weari- 
ness from pretty people, or who have seen cut flowers to some pro- 
fusion, or who see, after a world of pains have been successfully 
taken for the costume, how the least mistake in sentiment takes all 
the beauty out of your clothes, — affirm, that the secret of ugliness 
consists not in irregularity, but in being uninteresting. 

We love any forms, however ugly, from which great qualities 
shine. If command, eloquence, art, or invention, exist in the most 
deformed person, all the accidents that usually displease, please and 
raise esteem and wonder higher. The great orator was an emaciated, 
insignificant person, but he was all brain. Cardinal De Retz says 
of De Bouillon, "With the physiognomy of an ox, he had the per- 
spicacity of an eagle." It was said of Hooke, the friend of Newton, 
"he is the most, and promises the least, of any man in England." 
"Since I am so ugly," said Du Guesclin, "it behooves that I be bold." 
Sir Philip Sidney, the darling of mankind, Ben Jonson tells us, 
"was no pleasant man in countenance, his face being spoiled with 
pimples, and of high blood, and long." Those who have ruled 
human destinies, like planets, for thousands of years, were not hand- 
some men. If a man can raise a small city to be a great kingdom, 
can make bread cheap, can irrigate deserts, can join oceans by canals, 
can subdue steam, can organize victory, can lead the opinions of 
mankind, can enlarge knowledge, 'tis no matter whether his nose 
is parallel to his spine, as it ought to be, or whether he has a nose 
at all; whether his legs are straight, or whether his legs are ampu- 
tated; his deformities will come to be reckoned ornamental, and 
advantageous on the whole. This is the triumph of expression, 
degrading beauty, charming us with a power so fine and friendly 
and intoxicating, that it makes admired persons insipid, and the 
thought of passing our lives with them insupportable. There are 
faces so fluid with expression, so flushed and rippled by the play of 
thought, that we can hardly find what the mere features really are. 
When the delicious beauty of hneaments loses its power, it is because 
a more delicious beauty has appeared; that an interior and durable 
form has been disclosed. Still, Beauty rides on her lion, as before. 



308 RALPH WALDO EMERSON 

Still, "it was for beauty that the world was made." The lives of the 
Italian artists, who established a despotism of genius amidst the 
dukes and kings and mobs of their stormy epoch, prove how loyal 
men in all times are to a finer brain, a finer method, than their own. 
If a man can cut such a head on his stone gate-post as shall draw 
and keep a crowd about it all day, by its beauty, good nature, and 
inscrutable meaning; — if a man can build a plain cottage with such 
symmetry, as to make all the fine palaces look cheap and vulgar; 
can take such advantage of Nature, that all her powers serve him; 
making use of geometry, instead of expense; tapping a mountain 
for his water-jet; causing the sun and moon to seem only the deco- 
rations of his estate; this is still the legitimate dominion of beauty. 

The radiance of the human form, though sometimes astonishing, 
is only a burst of beauty for a few years or a few months, at the 
perfection of youth, and in most, rapidly declines. But we remain 
lovers of it, only transferring our interest to interior excellence. And 
it is not only admirable in singular and salient talents, but also in 
the world of manners. 

But the sovereign attribute remains to be noted. Things are pretty, 
graceful, rich, elegant, handsome, but until they speak to the imagi- 
nation, not yet beautiful. This is the reason why beauty is still 
escaping out of all analysis. It is not yet possessed, it cannot be 
handled. Proclus says, "it swims on the light of forms." It is prop- 
erly not in the form, but in the mind. It instantly deserts possession, 
and flies to an object in the horizon. If I could put my hand on the 
north star, would it be as beautiful ? The sea is lovely, but when we 
bathe in it, the beauty forsakes all the near water. For the imagina- 
tion and senses cannot be gratified at the same time. Wordsworth 
rightly speaks of "a light that never was on sea or land," meaning, 
that it was supplied by the observer, and the Welsh bard warns his 
country-women, that 

— "half of their charms with Cadwallon shall die." 

The new virtue which constitutes a thing beautiful, is a certain cos- 
mical quality, or, a power to suggest relation to the whole world, 
and so lift the object out of a pitiful individuality. Every natural 
feature, — sea, sky, rainbow, flowers, musical tone, — has in it some- 



BEAUTY 309 

what which is not private, but universal, speaks of that central benefit 
which is the soul of Nature, and thereby is beautiful. And, in chosen 
men and women, I find somewhat in form, speech, and manners, 
which is not of their person and family, but of a humane, catholic, 
and spiritual character, and we love them as the sky. They have a 
largeness of suggestion, and their face and manners carry a certain 
grandeur, like time and justice. 

The feat of the imagination is in showing the convertibility of 
every thing into every other thing. Facts which had never before left 
their stark common sense, suddenly figure as Eleusinian mysteries. 
My boots and chair and candlestick are fairies in disguise, meteors 
and constellations. All the facts in Nature are nouns of the intellect, 
and make the grammar of the eternal language. Every word has a 
double, treble, or centuple use and meaning. What! has my stove 
and pepper-pot a false bottom! I cry you mercy, good shoe-box! I 
did not know you were a jewel-case. Chaff and dust begin to sparkle, 
and are clothed about with immortality. And there is a joy in per- 
ceiving the representative or symbolic character of a fact, which no 
bare fact or event can ever give. There are no days in life so 
memorable as those which vibrated to some stroke of the imagina- 
tion. 

The poets are quite right in decking their mistresses with the 
spoils of the landscape, flower-gardens, gems, rainbows, flushes of 
morning, and stars of night, since all beauty points at identity, and 
whatsoever thing does not express to me the sea and sky, day and 
night, is somewhat forbidden and wrong. Into every beautiful ob- 
ject, there enters somewhat immeasurable and divine, and just as 
much into form bounded by outlines, like mountains on the horizon, 
as into tones of music, or depths of space. Polarized light showed 
the secret architecture of bodies; and when the second-sight of the 
mind is opened, now one color or form or gesture, and now another, 
has a pungency, as if a more interior ray had been emitted, disclosing 
its deep holdings in the frame of things. 

The laws of this translation we do not know, or why one feature 
or gesture enchants, why one word or syllable intoxicates, but the 
fact is familiar that the fine touch of the eye, or a grace of manners, 
or a phrase of poetry, plants wings at our shoulders; as if the Divin- 



310 RALPH WALDO EMERSON 

ity, in his approaches, Ufts away mountains of obstruction, and deigns 
to draw a truer Une, which the mind knows and owns. This is that 
haughty force of beauty, "vis sttperba formce," which the poets praise, 
— under calm and precise outHne, the immeasurable and divine: 
Beauty hiding all wisdom and power in its calm sky. 

All high beauty has a moral element in it, and I find the antique 
sculpture as ethical as Marcus Antoninus: and the beauty ever in 
proportion to the depth of thought. Gross and obscure natures, how- 
ever decorated, seem impure shambles; but character gives splendor 
to youth, and awe to wrinkled skin and gray hairs. An adorer of 
truth we cannot choose but obey, and the woman who has shared 
with us the moral sentiment, — her locks must appear to us sublime. 
Thus there is a climbing scale of culture, from the first agreeable 
sensation which a sparkling gem or a scarlet stain affords the eye, 
up through fair outlines and details of the landscape, features of the 
human face and form, signs and tokens of thought and character 
in manners, up to the ineffable mysteries of the intellect. Wherever 
we begin, thither our steps tend: an ascent from the joy of a horse 
in his trappings, up to the perception of Newton, that the globe on 
which we ride is only a larger apple falling from a larger tree; up to 
the perception of Plato, that globe and universe are rude and early 
expressions of an all-dissolving Unity, — the first stair on the scale to 
the temple of the Mind. 



ENGLISH TRAITS 



CONTENTS 



PAGE 



First Visit to England 315 

Voyage to England 326 

Land 331 

Race 336 

Ability 352 

Manners 366 

Truth 373 

Character 379 

Cockayne 387 

Wealth 392 

Aristocracy 402 

Universities 415 

Religion 423 

Literature 432 

The "Times" 447 

Stonehenge 453 

Personal 462 

Result 466 

Speech at Manchester 471 



ENGLISH TRAITS 

(1856) 

CHAPTER I 

FIRST VISIT TO ENGLAND 

I HAVE been twice in England. In 1833, on my return from a 
short tour in Sicily, Italy, and France, I crossed from Boulogne, 
and landed in London at the Tower stairs. It was a dark Sun- 
day morning; there were few people in the streets; and I remember 
the pleasure of that first walk on English ground, with my com- 
panion, an American artist, from the Tower up through Cheapside 
and the Strand, to a house in Russell Square, whither we had been 
recommended to good chambers. For the first time for many 
months we were forced to check the saucy habit of travellers' criti- 
cism, as we could no longer speak aloud in the streets without being 
understood. The shop-signs spoke our language; our country names 
were on the door-plates; and the public and private buildings wore 
a more native and wonted front. 

Like most young men at that time, I was much indebted to the 
men of Edinburgh, and of the Edinburgh Review, — to Jeffrey, 
Mackintosh, Hallam, and to Scott, Playfair, and De Quincey; and 
my narrow and desultory reading had inspired the wish to see the 
faces of three or four writers, — Coleridge, Wordsworth, Landor, De 
Quincey, and the latest and strongest contributor to the critical jour- 
nals, Carlyle; and I suppose if I had sifted the reasons that led me to 
Europe, when I was ill and was advised to travel, it was mainly the 
attraction of these persons. If Goethe had been still living, I might 
have wandered into Germany also. Besides those I have named (for 
Scott was dead), there was not in Britain the man living whom I 
cared to behold, unless it were the Duke of Wellington, whom I 
afterwards saw at Westminster Abbey, at the funeral of Wilberforce. 

315 



3l6 ENGLISH TRAITS 

The young scholar fancies it happiness enough to hve with people 
who can give an inside to the world; without reflecting that they are 
prisoners, too, of their own thought, and cannot apply themselves to 
yours. The conditions of literary success are almost destructive of 
the best social power, as they do not leave that frolic liberty which 
only can encounter a companion on the best terms. It is probable 
you left some obscure comrade at a tavern, or in the farms, with 
right mother-wit, and equality to life, when you crossed sea and land 
to play bo-peep with celebrated scribes. I have, however, found 
writers superior to their books, and I cling to my first beHef, that 
a strong head will dispose fast enough of these impediments, and 
give one the satisfaction of reality, the sense of having been met, 
and a larger horizon. 

On looking over the diary of my journey in 1833 I find nothing 
to publish in my memoranda of visits to places. But I have copied a 
few notes I made of visits to persons, as they respect parties quite 
too good and too transparent to the whole world to make it needful 
to affect any prudery of suppression about a few hints of those 
bright personalities. 

At Florence, chief among artists I found Horatio Greenough, the 
American sculptor. His face was so handsome, and his person so 
well formed, that he might be pardoned, if, as was alleged, the face 
of his Medora, and the figure of a colossal Achilles in clay, were 
idealizations of his own. Greenough was a superior man, ardent 
and eloquent, and all his opinions had elevation and magnanimity. 
He believed that the Greeks had wrought in schools or fraternities, 
— the genius of the master imparting his design to his friends, and 
inflaming them with it, and when his strength was spent, a new 
hand, with equal heat, continued the work; and so by relays, until 
it was finished in every part with equal fire. This was necessary in 
so refractory a material as stone; and he thought art would never 
prosper until we left our shy jealous ways, and worked in society as 
they. All his thoughts breathed the same generosity. He was an 
accurate and a deep man. He was a votary of the Greeks, and im- 
patient of Gothic art. His paper on Architecture, published in 1843, 
announced in advance the leading thoughts of Mr. Ruskin on the 
morality in architecture, notwithstanding the antagonism in their 



FIRST VISIT TO ENGLAND 317 

views of the history of art. I have a private letter from him, — later, 
but respecting the same period, — in which he roughly sketches his 
own theory. "Here is my theory of structure: A scientific arrange- 
ment of spaces and forms to functions and to site; an emphasis of 
features proportioned to their gradated importance in function; 
color and ornament to be decided and arranged and varied by 
strictly organic laws, having a distinct reason for each decision; the 
entire and immediate banishment of all make-shift and make- 
believe." 

Greenough brought me, through a common friend, an invitation 
from Mr. Landor, who lived at San Domenica di Fiesole. On the 
15th May I dined with Mr. Landor. I found him noble and courte- 
ous, living in a cloud of pictures at his Villa Gherardesca, a fine 
house commanding a beautiful landscape. I had inferred from his 
books, or magnified from some anecdotes, an impression of Achillean 
wrath, — an untamable petulance. I do not know whether the impu- 
tation were just or not, but certainly on this May day his courtesy 
veiled that haughty mind, and he was the most patient and gentle 
of hosts. He praised the beautiful cyclamen which grows all about 
Florence; he admired Washington; talked of Wordsworth, Byron, 
Massinger, Beaumont and Fletcher. To be sure, he is decided in his 
opinions, likes to surprise, and is well content to impress, if possible, 
his English whim upon the immutable past. No great man ever 
had a great son, if Philip and Alexander be not an exception; and 
Philip he calls the greater man. In art he loves the Greeks, and in 
sculpture, them only. He prefers the Venus to everything else, and, 
after that, the head of Alexander in the gallery here. He prefers 
John of Bologna to Michael Angelo; in painting, Raffaelle; and 
shares the growing taste for Perugino and the early masters. The 
Greek histories he thought the only good; and after them, Voltaire's. 
I could not make him praise Mackintosh, nor my more recent 
friends; Montaigne very cordially, — and Charron also, which seemed 
undiscriminating. He thought Degerando indebted to "Lucas on 
Happiness" and "Lucas on Holiness"! He pestered me with 
Southey; but who is Southey? 

He invited me to breakfast on Friday. On Friday I did not fail 
to go, and this time with Greenough. He entertained us at once 



3l8 ENGLISH TRAITS 

with reciting half a dozen hexameter Hnes of JuUus Caesar's! — from 
Donatus, he said. He glorified Lord Chesterfield more than was 
necessary, and undervalued Burke, and undervalued Socrates; desig- 
nated as three of the greatest of men, Washington, Phocion, and 
Timoleon; much as our pomologists, in their lists, select the three or 
the six best pears "for a small orchard"; and did not even omit to 
remark the similar termination of their names. "A great man," he 
said, "should make great sacrifices, and kill his hundred oxen with- 
out knowing whether they would be consumed by gods and heroes, 
or whether the flies would eat them." I had visited Professor Amici, 
who had shown me his microscopes, magnifying (it was said) two 
thousand diameters; and I spoke of the uses to which they were 
applied. Landor despised entomology, yet, in the same breath, said, 
"the subUme was in a grain of dust." I suppose I teased him about 
recent writers, but he professed never to have heard of Herschel, not 
even by name. One room full of pictures, which he likes to show, 
especially one piece, standing before which, he said "he would give 
fifty guineas to the man that would swear it was a Domenichino." 

I was more curious to see his library, but Mr. H , one of the 

guests, told me that Mr. Landor gives away his books, and has never 
more than a dozen at a time in his house. 

Mr. Landor carries to its height the love of freak which the Eng- 
lish delight to indulge, as if to signalize their commanding freedom. 
He has a wonderful brain, despotic, violent, and inexhaustible, meant 
for a soldier, by what chance converted to letters, in which there is 
not a style nor a tint not known to him, yet with an English appetite 
for action and heroes. The thing done avails, and not what is said 
about it. An original sentence, a step forward, is worth more than 
all the censures. Landor is strangely undervalued in England; usu- 
ally ignored; and sometimes savagely attacked in the Reviews. The 
criticism may be right, or wrong, and is quickly forgotten; but year 
after year the scholar must still go back to Landor for a multitude 
of elegant sentences — for wisdom, wit, and indignation that are 
unforgetable. 

From London, on the 5th August, I went to Highgate, and 
wrote a note to Mr. Coleridge, requesting leave to pay my respects 



FIRST VISIT TO ENGLAND 319 

to him. It was near noon. Mr. Coleridge sent a verbal message, that 
he was in bed, but if I would call after one o'clock, he would see me. 
I returned at one, and he appeared, a short, thick old man, with 
bright blue eyes and fine clear complexion, leaning on his cane. He 
took snuff freely, which presently soiled his cravat and neat black 
suit. He asked whether I knew Allston, and spoke warmly of his 
merits and doings when he knew him in Rome; what a master of 
the Titianesque he was, &c., &c. He spoke of Dr. Channing. It 
was an unspeakable misfortune that he should have turned out a 
Unitarian after all. On this, he burst into a declamation on the folly 
and ignorance of Unitarianism, — its high unreasonableness; and 
taking up Bishop Waterland's book, which lay on the table, he read 
with vehemence two or three pages written by himself in the fly- 
leaves, — passages, too, which, I believe, are printed in the "Aids to 
Reflection." When he stopped to take breath, I interposed that, 
"whilst I highly valued all his explanations, I was bound to tell him 
that I was born and bred a Unitarian." "Yes," he said, "I supposed 
so;" and continued as before. "It was a wonder that after so many 
ages of unquestioning acquiescence in the doctrine of St. Paul, — the 
doctrine of the Trinity, which was also, according to Philo Judaeus, 
the doctrine of the Jews before Christ, — this handful of Priestleians 
should take on themselves to deny it, &c., &c. He was very sorry 
that Dr. Channing, — a man to whom he looked up, — no, to say that 
he looked up to him would be to speak falsely; but a man whom he 
looked at with so much interest, — should embrace such views. When 
he saw Dr. Channing, he had hinted to him that he was afraid he 
loved Christianity for what was lovely and excellent, — he loved the 
good in it, and not the true; and I tell you, sir, that I have known 
ten persons who loved the good, for one person who loved the true; 
but it is a far greater virtue to love the true for itself alone, than to 
love the good for itself alone. He (Coleridge) knew all about Uni- 
tarianism perfectly well, because he had once been a Unitarian, ahd 
knew what quackery it was. He had been called 'the rising star of 
Unitarianism.'" He went on defining, or rather refining: "The 
Trinitarian doctrine was realism; the idea of God was not essential, 
but super-essential;" talked of trinism tetra\ism, and much more, 
of which I only caught this, "that the will was that by which a 



320 ENGLISH TRAITS 

person is a person; because, if one should push me in the street, and 
so I should force the man next me into the kennel, I should at once 
exclaim, 'I did not do it, sir,' meaning it was not my will." And this 
also, "that if you should insist on your faith here in England, and I 
on mine, mine would be the hotter side of the fagot." 

I took advantage of a pause to say that he had many readers of all 
religious opinions in America, and I proceeded to inquire if the 
"extract" from the Independent's pamphlet, in the third volume of 
the Friend, were a veritable quotation. He replied that it was really 
taken from a pamphlet in his possession, entitled "A Protest of 
one of the Independents," or something to that effect. I told him 
how excellent I thought it, and how much I wished to see the entire 
work. "Yes," he said, "the man was a chaos of truths, but lacked 
the knowledge that God was a God of order. Yet the passage would 
no doubt strike you more in the quotation than in the original, for 
I have filtered it." 

When I rose to go, he said, "I do not know whether you care 
about poetry, but I will repeat some verses I lately made on my 
baptismal anniversary," and he recited with strong emphasis, stand- 
ing, ten or twelve lines, beginning, 

"Born unto God in Christ — " 

He inquired where I had been travelling; and on learning that I 
had been in Malta and Sicily, he compared one island with the 
other, "repeating what he had said to the Bishop of London when he 
returned from that country, that Sicily was an excellent school of 
political economy; for, in any town there, it only needed to ask 
what the government enacted, and reverse that to know what ought 
to be done; it was the most felicitously opposite legislation to any- 
thing good and wise. There were only three things which the 
government had brought into that garden of delights, namely, itch, 
pox, and famine. Whereas, in Malta, the force of law and mind was 
seen, in making that barren rock of semi-Saracen inhabitants the 
seat of population and plenty." Going out, he showed me in the next 
apartment a picture of Allston's and told me "that Montague, a pic- 
ture-dealer, once came to see him, and, glancing towards this, said, 
'Well, you have got a picture!' thinking it the work of an old master; 



FIRST VISIT TO ENGLAND 321 

afterwards, Montague, still talking with his back to the canvas, put 
up his hand and touched it, and exclaimed, 'By Heaven! this picture 
is not ten years old :' — so delicate and skilful was that man's touch." 
I was in his company for about an hour, but find it impossible to 
recall the largest part of his discourse, which was often like so many 
printed paragraphs in his book, — perhaps the same, — so readily did 
he fall into certain commonplaces. As I might have foreseen, the 
visit was rather a spectacle than a conversation, of no use beyond 
the satisfaction of my curiosity. He was old and preoccupied, and 
could not bend to a new companion and think with him. 

From Edinburgh I went to the Highlands. On my return, I came 
from Glasgow to Dumfries, and being intent on delivering a letter 
which I had brought from Rome, inquired for Craigenputtock. It 
was a farm in Nithsdale, in the parish of Dunscore, sixteen miles 
distant. No public coach passed near it, so I took a private carriage 
from the inn. I found the house amid desolate heathery hills, where 
the lonely scholar nourished his mighty heart. Carlyle was a man 
from his youth, an author who did not need to hide from his readers, 
and as absolute a man of the world, unknown and exiled on that 
hill-farm, as if holding on his own terms what is best in London. 
He was tall and gaunt, with a cliff-like brow, self-possessed and hold- 
ing his extraordinary powers of conversation in easy command; 
clinging to his northern accent with evident relish; full of lively 
anecdote, and with a streaming humor, which floated everything he 
looked upon. His talk playfully exalting the familiar objects put the 
companion at once into an acquaintance with his Lars and Lemurs, 
and it was very pleasant to learn what was predestined to be a pretty 
mythology. Few were the objects and lonely the man, "not a person 
to speak to within sixteen miles except the minister of Dunscore"; 
so that books inevitably made his topics. 

He had names of his own for all the matters familiar to his dis- 
course. "Blackwood's" was the "sand magazine;" "Fraser's" nearer 
approach to possibility of life was the "mud magazine"; a piece of 
road near by that marked some failed enterprise was the "grave of 
the last sixpence." When too much praise of any genius annoyed 
him, he professed hugely to admire the talent shown by his pig. He 



322 ENGLISH TRAITS 

had spent much time and contrivance in confining the poor beast to 
one enclosure in his pen, but pig, by great strokes of judgment, had 
found out how to let a board down and had foiled him. For all that, 
he still thought man the most plastic little fellow in the planet, and 
he liked Nero's death "Qualis artifex pereo!" better than most his- 
tory. He worships a man that will manifest any truth to him. At 
one time he had inquired and read a good deal about America. 
Landor's principle was mere rebellion, and that he feared was the 
American principle. The best thing he knew of that country was 
that in it a man can have meat for his labor. He had read in Stew- 
art's book that when he inquired in a New York hotel for the Boots, 
he had been shown across the street and had found Mungo in his 
own house dining on roast turkey. 

We talked of books. Plato he does not read, and he disparaged 
Socrates; and, when pressed, persisted in making Mirabeau a hero. 
Gibbon he called the splendid bridge from the old world to the new. 
His own reading had been multifarious. Tristram Shandy was one 
of his first books after Robinson Crusoe, and Robertson's America 
an early favorite. Rousseau's Confessions had discovered to him that 
he was not a dunce; and it was now ten years since he had learned 
German, by the advice of a man who told him he would find in 
that language what he wanted. 

He took despairing or satirical views of literature at this moment; 
recounted the incredible sums paid in one year by the great book- 
sellers for puffing. Hence it comes that no newspaper is trusted 
now, no books are bought, and the booksellers are on the eve of 
bankruptcy. 

He still returned to English pauperism, the crowded country, the 
selfish abdication by public men of all that public persons should 
perform. "Government should direct poor men what to do. Poor 
Irish folk come wandering over these moors. My dame makes it a 
rule to give to every son of Adam bread to eat, and supplies his 
wants to the next house. But here are thousands of acres which 
might give them all meat, and nobody to bid these poor Irish go to 
the moor and till it. They burned the stacks, and so found a way 
to force the rich people to attend to them." 

We went out to walk over long hills, and looked at Criffel, then 



FIRST VISIT TO ENGLAND 323 

without his cap, and down into Wordsworth's country. There we 
sat down, and talked of the immortaUty of the soul. It was not 
Carlyle's fault that we talked on that topic, for he had the natural 
disinclination of every nimble spirit to bruise itself against walls, 
and did not like to place himself where no step can be taken. But 
he was honest and true, and cognizant of the subtile links that bind 
ages together, and saw how every event affects all the future. "Christ 
died on the tree: that built Dunscore kirk yonder: that brought you 
and me together. Time has only a relative existence." 

He was already turning his eyes towards London with a scholar's 
appreciation. London is the heart of the world, he said, wonderful 
only from the mass of human beings. He liked the huge machine. 
Each keeps its own round. The baker's boy brings muffins to the 
window at a fixed hour every day, and that is all the Londoner 
knows or wishes to know on the subject. But it turned out good 
men. He named certain individuals, especially one man of letters, 
his friend, the best mind he knew, whom London had well served. 

On the 28th August, I went to Rydal Mount, to pay my respects 
to Mr. Wordsworth. His daughters called in their father, a plain, 
elderly, white-haired man, not prepossessing, and disfigured by green 
goggles. He sat down and talked with great simplicity. He had 
just returned from a journey. His health was good, but he had 
broken a tooth by a fall, when walking with two lawyers, and had 
said that he was glad it did not happen forty years ago; whereupon 
they had praised his philosophy. 

He had much to say of America, the more that it gave occasion 
for his favorite topic, — that society is being enlightened by a super- 
ficial tuition, out of all proportion to its being restrained by moral 
culture. Schools do no good. Tuition is not education. He thinks 
more of the education of circumstances than of tuition. 'Tis not 
question whether there are offences of which the law takes cogniz- 
ance, but whether there are offences of which the law does not take 
cognizance. Sin is what he fears, and how society is to escape with- 
out gravest mischiefs from this source — ? He has even said, what 
seemed a paradox, that they needed a civil war in America, to teach 
the necessity of knitting the social ties stronger. "There may be," 



324 ENGLISH TRAITS 

he said, "in America some vulgarity in manner, but that's not im- 
portant. That comes of the pioneer state of things. But I fear they 
are too much given to the making of money; and secondly to poli- 
tics; that they make political distinction the end, and not the means. 
And I fear they lack a class of men of leisure, — in short, of gentle- 
men, — to give a tone of honor to the community. I am told that 
things are boasted of in the second class of society there, which, in 
England, — God knows, are done in England every day, — ^but would 
never be spoken of. In America I wish to know not how many 
churches or schools, but what newspapers? My friend. Colonel 
Hamilton, at the foot of the hill, who was a year in America, assures 
me that the newspapers are atrocious, and accuse members of Con- 
gress of stealing spoons!" He was against taking off the tax on news- 
papers in England which the reformers represent as a tax upon 
knowledge, for this reason, that they would be inundated with base 
prints. He said, he talked on political aspects, for he wished to 
impress on me and all good Americans to cultivate the moral, the 
conservative, &c., &c., and never to call into action the physical 
strength of the people, as had just now been done in England in the 
Reform Bill, — a thing prophesied by Delolme. He alluded once or 
twice to his conversation with Dr. Channing, who had recently vis- 
ited him (laying his hand on a particular chair in which the Doctor 
had sat). 

The conversation turned on books. Lucretius he esteems a far 
higher poet than Virgil: not in his system, which is nothing, but in 
his power of illustration. Faith is necessary to explain anything, and 
to reconcile the foreknowledge of God with human evil. Of Cousin 
(whose lectures we had all been reading in Boston), he knew only 
the name. 

I inquired if he had read Carlyle's critical ardcles and translations. 
He said he thought him sometimes insane. He proceeded to abuse 
Goethe's Wilhelm Meister heartily. It was full of all manner of 
fornication. It was like the crossing of flies in the air. He had never 
gone farther than the first part; so disgusted was he that he threw 
the book across the room. I deprecated this wrath, and said what I 
could for the better parts of the book; and he courteously prom- 
ised to look at it again. Carlyle, he said, wrote most obscurely. He 



FIRST VISIT TO ENGLAND 325 

was clever and deep, but he defied the sympathies of everybody. 
Even Mr. Coleridge wrote more clearly, though he had always 
wished Coleridge would write more to be understood. He led me 
out into his garden, and showed me the gravel walk in which thou- 
sands of his lines were composed. His eyes are much inflamed. This 
is no loss, except for reading, because he never writes prose, and 
of poetry he carries even hundreds of lines in his head before writ- 
ing them. He had just returned from a visit to Stafia, and within 
three days had made three sonnets on Fingal's Cave, and was com- 
posing a fourth when he was called in to see me. He said, "If you 
are interested in my verses, perhaps you will like to hear these lines." 
I gladly assented; and he recollected himself for a few moments, and 
then stood forth and repeated, one after the other, the three entire 
sonnets with great animation. I fancied the second and third more 
beautiful than his poems are wont to be. The third is addressed 
to the flowers, which, he said, especially the ox-eye daisy, are very 
abundant on the top of the rock. The second alludes to the name 
of the cave, which is "Cave of Music"; the first to the circumstance 
of its being visited by the promiscuous company of the steamboat. 

This recitation was so unlooked for and surprising, — he, the old 
Wordsworth, standing apart, and reciting to me in a garden-walk, 
like a schoolboy declaiming, — that I at first was near to laugh; but 
recollecting myself, that I had come thus far to see a poet, and he 
was chanting poems to me, I saw that he was right and I was wrong, 
and gladly gave myself up to hear. I told him how much the few 
printed extracts had quickened the desire to possess his unpublished 
poems. He replied, he never was in haste to publish; partly because 
he corrected a good deal, and every alteration is ungraciously re- 
ceived after printing; but what he had written would be printed, 
whether he lived or died. I said "Tintern Abbey" appeared to be 
the favorite poem with the public, but more contemplative readers 
preferred the first books of the "Excursion," and the Sonnets. He 
said, "Yes, they are better." He preferred such of his poems as 
touched the affections to any others; for whatever is didactic — what 
theories of society, and so on — might perish quickly; but whatever 
combined a truth with an affection was «rrj^ia es aei, good to-day 
and good forever. He cited the sonnet, "On the feelings of a 



326 ENGLISH TRAITS 

high-minded Spaniard" which he preferred to any other (I so under- 
stood him), and the "Two Voices"; and quoted with evident pleas- 
ure, the verses addressed "To the Skylark." In this connection he 
said of the Newtonian theory that it might yet be superseded and 
forgotten; and Dalton's atomic theory. 

When I prepared to depart, he said he wished to show me what a 
common person in England could do, and he led me into the en- 
closure of his clerk, a young man, to whom he had given this slip 
of ground, which was laid out, or its natural capabilities shown, 
with much taste. He then said he would show me a better way 
towards the inn; and he walked a good part of a mile, talking, and 
ever and anon stopping short to impress the word or the verse, and 
finally parted from me with great kindness, and returned across the 
fields. 

Wordsworth honored himself by his simple adherence to truth, 
and was very wilHng not to shine; but he surprised by the hard 
limits of his thought. To judge from a single conversation, he made 
the impression of a narrow and very English mind; of one who 
paid for his rare elevation by general tameness and conformity. Oif 
his own beat, his opinions were of no value. It is not very rare 
to find persons loving sympathy and ease, who expiate their de- 
parture from the common in one direction by their conformity in 
every other. 

CHAPTER II 

VOYAGE TO ENGLAND 

The occasion of my second visit to England was an invitation from 
some Mechanics' Institutes in Lancashire and Yorkshire, which sepa- 
rately are organized much in the same way as our New England 
Lyceums, but, in 1847, had been linked into a "Union," which 
embraced twenty or thirty towns and cities, and presently extended 
into the middle counties, and northward into Scotland. I was 
invited, on liberal terms, to read a series of lectures in them all. The 
request was urged with every kind suggestion, and every assurance 
of aid and comfort, by friendliest parties in Manchester, who, in the 



VOYAGE TO ENGLAND 327 

sequel, amply redeemed their word. The remuneration was equiva- 
lent to the fees at that time paid in this country for the like services. 
At all events, it was sufficient to cover any travelling expenses, and 
the proposal offered an excellent opportunity of seeing the interior 
of England and Scotland, by means of a home, and a committee of 
intelligent friends, awaiting me in every town. I did not go very 
willingly. I am not a good traveller, nor have I found that long 
journeys yield a fair share of reasonable hours. But the invitadon 
was repeated and pressed at a moment of more leisure, and when I 
was a little spent by some unusual studies. I wanted a change and 
a tonic, and England was proposed to me. Besides, there were at 
least, the dread attraction and salutary influences of the sea. So 
I took my berth in the packet-ship Washington Irving, and sailed 
from Boston on Tuesday, 5th October, 1847. 

On Friday, at noon, we had only made one hundred and thirty- 
four miles. A nimble Indian would have swum as far; but the 
captain affirmed that the ship would show us in time all her paces, 
and we crept along through the floating drift of boards, logs, and 
chips, which the rivers of Maine and New Brunswick pour into 
the sea after a freshet. 

At last, on Sunday night, after doing one day's work in four, the 
storm came, the winds blew, and we flew before a north-wester, 
which strained every rope and sail. The good ship darts through the 
water all day, all night, like a fish, quivering with speed, gliding 
through liquid leagues, sliding from horizon to horizon. She has 
passed Cape Sable; she has reached the Banks; the land-birds are 
left; gulls, haglets, ducks, petrels, swim, dive, and hover around; 
no fishermen; she has passed the Banks; left five sail behind her, 
far on the edge of the west at sundown, which were far east of us at 
morn, — though they say at sea a stern chase is a long race, — and still 
we fly for our lives. The shortest sea-line from Boston to Liverpool 
is 2850 miles. This a steamer keeps, and saves 150 miles. A sailing 
ship can never go in a shorter line than 3000, and usually it is much 
longer. Our good master keeps his kites up to the last moment, 
studding-sails alow and aloft, and, by incessant straight steering, 
never loses a rod of way. Watchfulness is the law of the ship, — 
watch on watch, for advantage and for life. Since the ship was built, 



328 ENGLISH TRAITS 

it seems, the master never slept but in his day-clothes whilst on. 
board. "There are many advantages," says Saadi, "in sea-voyaging, 
but security is not one of them." Yet in hurrying over these abysses, 
whatever dangers we are running into, we are certainly running out 
of the risks of hundreds of miles every day, which have their own 
chances of squall, collision, sea-stroke, piracy, cold, and thunder. 
Hour for hour, the risk on a steamboat is greater; but the speed is 
safety, or, twelve days of danger, instead of twenty-four. Our ship 
was registered 750 tons, and weighed perhaps, with all her freight, 
1500 tons. The mainmast, from the deck to the top-button, measured 
115 feet; the length of the deck, from stem to stern, 155. It is 
impossible not to personify a ship; everybody does, in everything 
they say: — she behaves well; she minds her rudder; she swims like a 
duck; she runs her nose into the water; she looks into a port. Then 
that wonderful esprit de corps, by which we adopt into our self-love 
everything we touch, makes us all champions of her sailing qualities. 

The conscious ship hears all the praise. In one week she has made 
1467 miles, and now, at night, seems to hear the steamer behind her, 
which left Boston to-day at two, has mended her speed, and is flying 
before the gray south wind eleven and a half knots the hour. The 
sea-fire shines in her wake, and far around wherever a wave breaks. 
I read the hour, ph. 45', on my watch by this Hght. Near the equator, 
you can read small print by it; and the mate describes the phosphoric 
insects, when taken up in a pail, as shaped like a Carolina potato. 

I find the sea-life an acquired taste, like that for tomatoes and 
olives. The confinement, cold, motion, noise, and odor are not to be 
dispensed with. The floor of your room is sloped at an angle of 
twenty or thirty degrees, and I waked every morning with the belief 
that some one was tipping up my berth. Nobody likes to be treated 
ignominiously, upset, shoved against the side of the house, rolled 
over, suffocated with bilge, mephitis, and stewing oil. We get used 
to these annoyances at last, but the dread of the sea remains longer. 
The sea is masculine, the type of active strength. Look, what egg- 
shells are drifting all over it, each one, like ours, filled with men in 
ecstasies of terror, alternating with cockney conceit, as the sea is 
rough or smooth. Is this sad-colored circle an eternal cemetery? In 
our graveyards we scoop a pit, but this aggressive water opens mile- 



VOYAGE TO ENGLAND 329 

wide pits and chasms, and makes a mouthful of a fleet. To the 
geologist, the sea is the only firmament; the land is in perpetual flux 
and change, now blown up like a tumor, now sunk in a chasm, 
and the registered observations of a few hundred years find it in a 
perpetual tilt, rising and falling. The sea keeps its old level; and 
'tis no wonder that the history of our race is so recent, if the roar 
of the ocean is silencing our traditions. A rising of the sea, such as 
has been observed, say an inch in a century, from east to west on the 
land, will bury all the towns, monuments, bones, and knowledge 
of mankind, steadily and insensibly. If it is capable of these great 
and secular mischiefs, it is quite as ready at private and local damage; 
and of this no landsman seems so fearful as the seaman. Such dis- 
comfort and such danger as the narratives of the captain and mate 
disclose are bad enough as the costly fee we pay for entrance to 
Europe; but the wonder is always new that any sane man can be 
a sailor. And here, on the second day of our voyage, stepped out a 
Uttle boy in his shirt-sleeves, who had hid himself, whilst the ship 
was in port, in the bread-closet, having no money, and wishing to 
go to England. The sailors have dressed him in Guernsey frock, 
with a knife in his belt, and he is cHmbing nimbly about after them, 
"likes the work first-rate, and, if the captain will take him, means 
now to come back again in the ship." The mate avers that this is 
the history of all sailors; nine out of ten are runaway boys; and adds 
that all of them are sick of the sea, but stay in it out of pride. Jack 
has a life of risks, incessant abuse, and the worst pay. It is a little 
better with the mate, and not very much better with the captain. 
A hundred dollars a month is reckoned high pay. If sailors were 
contented, if they had not resolved again and again not to go to 
sea any more, I should respect them. 

Of course, the inconveniences and terrors of the sea are not of any 
account to those whose minds are preoccupied. The water-laws, 
arctic frost, the mountain, the mine, only shatter cockneyism; every 
noble activity makes room for itself. A great mind is a good sailor, 
as a great heart is. And the sea is not slow in disclosing inestimable 
secrets to a good naturalist. 

'Tis a good rule in every journey to provide some piece of liberal 
study to rescue the hours which bad weather, bad company, and 



330 ENGLISH TRAITS 

taverns steal from the best economist. Classics which at home are 
drowsily read have a strange charm in a country inn, or in the 
transom of a merchant brig. I remember that some of the happiest 
and most valuable hours I have owed to books, passed many years 
ago, on shipboard. The worst impediment I have found at sea is the 
want of light in the cabin. 

We found on board the usual cabin library: Basil Hall, Dumas, 
Dickens, Bulwer, Balzac, and Sand were our sea-gods. Among the 
passengers, there was some variety of talent and profession; we 
exchanged our experiences, and all learned something. The busiest 
talk with leisure and convenience at sea, and sometimes a memorable 
fact turns up, which you have long had a vacant niche for, and seize 
with the joy of a collector. But, under the best conditions, a voyage 
is one of the severest tests to try a man. A college examination is 
nothing to it. Sea-days are long, — these lack-lustre, joyless days 
which whistled over us; but they were few, — only fifteen, as the 
captain counted, sixteen according to me. Reckoned from the time 
when we left soundings, our speed was such that the captain drew 
the line of his course in red ink on his chart, for the encouragement 
or envy of future navigators. 

It has been said that the King of England would consult his 
dignity by giving audience to foreign ambassadors in the cabin of a 
man-of-war. And I think the white path of an Atlantic ship the 
right avenue to the palace front of this seafaring people, who for 
hundreds of years claimed the strict sovereignty of the sea, and 
exacted toll and the striking sail from the ships of all other peoples. 
When their privilege was disputed by the Dutch and other junior 
marines, on the plea that you could never anchor on the same wave, 
or hold property in what was always flowing, the English did not 
stick to claim the channel, or bottom of all the main. "As if," said 
they, "we contended for the drops of the sea, and not for its situation, 
or the bed of those waters. The sea is bounded by his majesty's 
empire." 

As we neared the land, its genius was felt. This was inevitably the 
British side. In every man's thought arises now a new system, Eng- 
lish sentiments, English loves and fears, English history and social 
modes. Yesterday, every passenger had measured the speed of the 



ship by watching the bubbles over the ship's bulwarks. To-day, 
instead of bubbles, we measure by Kinsale, Cork, Waterford, and 
Ardraore. There lay the green shore of Ireland, Uke some coast of 
plenty. We could see towns, towers, churches, harvests; but the 
curse of eight hundred years we could not discern. 

CHAPTER III 



Alfieri thought Italy and England the only countries worth living 
in; the former, because there nature vindicates her rights, and 
triumphs over the evils inflicted by the governments; the latter, 
because art conquers nature, and transforms a rude, ungenial land 
into a paradise of comfort and plenty. England is a garden. Under 
an ash-colored sky, the fields have been combed and rolled till they 
appear to have been finished with a pencil instead of a plough. The 
solidity of the structures that compose the towns speaks the industry 
of ages. Nothing is left as it was made. Rivers, hills, valleys, the sea 
itself feel the hand of a master. The long habitation of a powerful 
and ingenious race has turned every rood of land to its best use, has 
found all the capabilities, the arable soil, the quarriable rock, the 
highways, the byways, the fords, the navigable waters; and the new 
arts of intercourse meet you everywhere; so that England is a huge 
phalanstery, where all that man wants is provided within the 
precinct. Cushioned and comforted in every manner, the traveller 
rides as on a cannon-ball, high and low, over rivers and towns, 
through mountains, in tunnels of three or four miles, at near twice 
the speed of our trains; and reads quietly the Times newspaper, 
which, by its immense correspondence and reporting, seems to 
have machinized the rest of the world for his occasion. 

The problem of the traveller landing at Liverpool is, Why England 
is England ? What are the elements of that power which the English 
hold over other nations? If there be one test of national genius 
universally accepted, it is success; and if there be one successful 
country in the universe for the last millennium, that country is 
England. 



332 ENGLISH TRAITS 

A wise traveller will naturally choose to visit the best of actual 
nations; and an American has more reasons than another to draw 
him to Britain. In all that is done or begun by the Americans towards 
right thinking or practice, we are met by a civilization already 
settled and overpowering. The culture of the day, the thoughts and 
aims of men, are English thoughts and aims. A nation considerable 
for a thousand years since Egbert, it has, in the last centuries, 
obtained the ascendant, and stamped the knowledge, activity, and 
power of mankind with its impress. Those who resist it do not feel 
it or obey it less. The Russian in his snows is aiming to be English. 
The Turk and Chinese also are making awkward efforts to be 
English. The practical common-sense of modern society, the utili- 
tarian direction which labor, laws, opinion, rehgion take, is the 
natural genius of the British mind. The influence of France is a 
constituent of modern civility, but not enough opposed to the English 
for the most wholesome effect. The American is only the continua- 
tion of the English genius into new conditions, more or less 
propitious. 

See what books fill our libraries. Every book we read, every 
biography, play, romance, in whatever form, is still English history 
and manners. So that a sensible Englishman once said to me, "As 
long as you do not grant us copyright, we shall have the teaching 
of you." 

But we have the same difficulty in making a social or moral 
estimate of England, as the sheriff finds in drawing a jury to try 
some cause which has agitated the whole community, and on which 
everybody finds himself an interested party. Officers, jurors, judges 
have all taken sides. England has inoculated all nations with her 
civilization, intelligence, and tastes; and, to resist the tyranny and 
prepossession of the British element, a serious man must aid himself, 
by comparing with it the civilizations of the farthest east and west, 
the old Greek, the Oriental, and, much more, the ideal standard, if 
only by means of the very impatience which English forms are sure 
to awaken in independent minds. 

Besides, if we will visit London, the present time is the best time, 
as some signs portend that it has reached its highest point. It is 
observed that the English interest us a little less within a few years; 



LAND 333 

and hence the impression that the British power has culminated, 
is in solstice, or already declining. 

As soon as you enter England, which with Wales, is no larger than 
the State of Georgia,' this little land stretches by an illusion to the 
dimensions of an empire. The innumerable details, the crowded 
succession of towns, cities, cathedrals, castles, and great and decorated 
estates, the number and power of the trades and guilds, the military 
strength and splendor, the multitudes of rich and remarkable people, 
the servants and equipages, — all these catching the eye, and never 
allowing it to pause, hide all boundaries by the impression of mag- 
nificence and endless wealth. 

I reply to all the urgencies that refer me to this and that object 
indispensably to be seen, — ^Yes, to see England well needs a hundred 
years; for, what they told me was the merit of Sir John Soane's 
Museum, in London, — that it was well packed and well saved, — ■ 
is the merit of England; — it is stuffed full, in all corners and crevices, 
with towns, towers, churches, villas, palaces, hospitals, and charity- 
houses. In the history of art it is a long way from a cromlech to 
York minster; yet all the intermediate steps may still be traced in 
this all-preserving island. 

The territory has a singular perfection. The climate is warmer 
by many degrees than it is entitled to by latitude. Neither hot nor 
cold, there is no hour in the whole year when one cannot work. 
Here is no winter, but such days as we have in Massachusetts in 
November, a temperature which makes no exhausting demand on 
human strength, but allows the attainment of the largest stature. 
Charles the Second said, "it invited men abroad more days in the 
year and more hours in the day than another country." Then Eng- 
land has all the materials of a working country except wood. The 
constant rain, — a rain with every tide in some parts of the island, — 
keeps its multitude of rivers full, and brings agricultural production 
up to the highest point. It has plenty of water, of stone, of potter's 
clay, of coal, of salt, and of iron. The land naturally abounds with 
game; immense heaths and downs are paved with quails, grouse, and 
woodcock, and the shores are animated by water birds. The rivers 
and the surrounding sea spawn with fish; there are salmon for the 

'Add South Carolina, and you have more than an equivalent for the area of Scotland. 



334 ENGLISH TRAITS 

rich, and sprats and herrings for the poor. In the northern lochs 
the herring are in innumerable shoals; at one season, the country 
people say, the lakes contain one part water and two parts fish. 

The only drawback on this industrial conveniency is the darkness 
of its sky. The night and day are too nearly of a color. It strains 
the eyes to read and to write. Add the coal smoke. In the manufac- 
turing towns, the fine soot or blackj darken the day, give white 
sheep the color of black sheep, discolor the human saliva, contami- 
nate the air, poison many plants, and corrode the monuments and 
buildings. 

The London fog aggravates the distempers of the sky, and some- 
times justifies the epigram on the climate by an English wit, "in a 
fine day, looking up a chimney; in a foul day, looking down one." 
A gentleman in Liverpool told me that he found he could do without 
a fire in his parlor about one day in the year. It is, however, pre- 
tended that the enormous consumption of coal in the island is also 
felt in modifying the general climate. 

Factitious climate, factitious position. England resembles a ship 
in its shape, and, if it were one, its best admiral could not have 
worked it, or anchored it in a more judicious or effective posidon. 
Sir John Herschel said, "London was the centre of the terrene globe." 
The shopkeeping nation, to use a shop word, has a good stand. The 
old Venetians pleased themselves with the flattery that Venice was in 
45°, midway between the poles and the line; as if that were an 
imperial centrality. Long of old, the Greeks fancied Delphi the 
navel of the earth, in their favorite mode of fabling the earth to be 
an animal. The Jews believed Jerusalem to be the centre. I have 
seen a kratometric chart designed to show that the city of Phila- 
delphia was in the same thermic belt, and, by inference, in the same 
belt of empire, as the cities of Athens, Rome, and London. It was 
drawn by a patriotic Philadelphian, and was examined with pleasure, 
under his showing, by the inhabitants of Chestnut Street. But when 
carried to Charleston, to New Orleans, and to Boston, it somehow 
failed to convince the ingenious scholars of all those capitals. 

But England is anchored at the side of Europe, and right in the 
heart of the modern world. The sea, which, according to Virgil's 
famous line, divided the poor Britons utterly from the world, proved 



LAND 335 

to be the ring of marriage with all nations. It is not down in the 
books, — it is written only in the geologic strata, — that fortunate day 
when a wave of the German Ocean burst the old isthmus which 
joined Kent and Cornwall to France, and gave to this fragment of 
Europe its impregnable sea wall, cutting off an island of eight 
hundred miles in length, with an irregular breadth reaching to 
three hundred miles; a territory large enough for independence 
enriched with every seed of national power, so near, that it can see 
the harvests of the continent; and so far, that who would cross the 
strait must be an expert mariner, ready for tempests. As America, 
Europe, and Asia he, these Britons have precisely the best commercial 
position in the whole planet, and are sure of a market for all the 
goods they can manufacture. And to make these advantages avail, 
the river Thames must dig its spacious oudet to the sea from the 
heart of the kingdom, giving road and landing to innumerable 
ships, and all the conveniency to trade, that a people so skilful and 
sufficient in economizing water-front by docks, warehouses, and 
lighters required. When James the First declared his purpose of 
punishing London by removing his Court, the Lord Mayor replied, 
"that, in removing his royal presence from his lieges, they hoped 
he would leave them the Thames." 

In the variety of surface, Britain is a miniature of Europe, having 
plain, forest, marsh, river, seashore; mines in Cornwall; caves in 
Matlock and Derbyshire; dehcious landscape in Dovedale, delicious 
sea-view at Tor Bay, Highlands in Scotland, Snowdon in Wales; 
and, in Westmoreland and Cumberland, a pocket Switzerland, in 
which the lakes and mountains are on a sufficient scale to fill the eye 
and touch the imagination. It is a nation conveniently small. Fonte- 
nelle thought that nature had sometimes a litde affectation; and 
there is such an artificial completeness in this nation of artificers, as 
if there were a design from the beginning to elaborate a bigger 
Birmingham. Nature held counsel with herself, and said, "My 
Romans are gone. To build my new empire, I will choose a rude 
race, all masculine, with brutish strength. I will not grudge a com- 
petition of the roughest males. Let buffalo gore buffalo and the 
pasture to the strongest! For I have work that requires the best will 
and sinew. Sharp and temperate northern breezes shall blow, to 



336 ENGLISH TRAITS 

keep that will alive and alert. The sea shall disjoin the people from 
others, and knit them to a fierce nationality. It shall give them 
markets on every side. Long time I will keep them on their feet, 
by poverty, border-wars, seafaring, sea-risks, and the stimulus of 
gain. An island, — but not so large, the people not so many, as to 
glut the great markets and depress one another, but proportioned 
to the size of Europe and the continents." 

With its fruits, and wares, and money, must its civil influence 
radiate. It is a singular coincidence to this geographic centrality, 
the spiritual centrality, which Emanuel Swedenborg ascribes to the 
people. "For the English nation, the best of them are in the centre 
of all Christians, because they have interior intellectual light. This 
appears conspicuously in the spiritual world. This light they derive 
from the liberty of speaking and writing, and thereby of thinking." 



CHAPTER IV 



An ingenious anatomist has written a book* to prove that races 
are imperishable, but nations are pliant political constructions, easily 
changed or destroyed. But this writer did not found his assumed 
races on any necessary law, disclosing their ideal or metaphysical 
necessity; nor did he, on the other hand, count with precision the 
existing races, and settle the true bounds; a point of nicety, and the 
popular test of the theory. The individuals at the extremes of diver- 
gence in one race of men are as unlike as the wolf to the lapdog. 
Yet each variety shades down imperceptibly into the next, and you 
cannot draw the line where a race begins or ends. Hence every 
writer makes a different count. Blumenbach reckons five races; 
Humboldt three; and Mr. Pickering, who lately, in our Exploring 
Expedition, thinks he saw all kinds of men that can be on the planet, 
makes eleven. 

The British Empire is reckoned to contain 222,000,000 souls, — 
perhaps a fifth of the population of the globe; and to comprise a 
territory of 5,000,000 square miles. So far have British people pre- 
^The Races, a Fragment. By Robert Knox. London, 1850. 



RACE 337 

dominated. Perhaps forty of these millions are of British stock. 
Add the United States of America, which reckon, exclusive of 
slaves, 20,000,000 of people, on a territory of 3,000,000 square miles, 
and in which the foreign element, however considerable, is rapidly 
assimilated, and you have a population of English descent and 
language of 60,000,000, and governing a population of 245,000,000 
souls. 

The British census proper reckons twenty-seven and a half mil- 
hons in the home countries. What makes this census important is 
the quality of the units that compose it. They are free forcible men, 
in a country where life is safe, and has reached the greatest value. 
They give the bias to the current age; and that, not by chance or by 
mass, but by their character, and by the number of individuals among 
them of personal ability. It has been denied that the English have 
genius. Be it as it may, men of vast intellect have been born on their 
soil, and they have made or applied the principal inventions. They 
have sound bodies, and supreme endurance in war and in labor. 
The spawning force of the race has sufficed to the colonization of 
great parts of the world; yet it remains to be seen whether they can 
make good the exodus of millions from Great Britain, amounting, 
in 1852, to more than a thousand a day. They have assimilating force, 
since they are imitated by their foreign subjects; and they are still 
aggressive and propagandist, enlarging the dominion of their arts 
and liberty. Their laws are hospitable, and slavery does not exist 
under them. V/hat oppression exists is incidental and temporary; 
their success is not sudden or fortunate, but they have maintained 
constancy and self-equality for many ages. 

Is this power due to their race, or to some other cause ? Men hear 
gladly of the power of blood or race. Everybody likes to know that 
his advantages cannot be attributed to air, soil, sea, or to local wealth, 
as mines and quarries, nor to laws and traditions, nor to fortune, but 
to superior brain, as it makes the praise more personal to him. 

We anticipate in the doctrine of race something like that law of 
physiology, that, whatever bone, muscle, or essential organ is found 
in one healthy individual, the same part or organ may be found in or 
near the same place in its congener; and we look to find in the son 
every mental and moral property that existed in the ancestor. In 



338 ENGLISH TRAITS 

race, it is not the broad shoulders, or htheness, or stature that give 
advantage, but a symmetry that reaches as far as to the wit. Then 
the miracle and renown begin. Then first we care to examine the 
pedigree, and copy heedf ully the training, — what food they ate, what 
nursing, school, and exercises they had, which resulted in this 
mother-wit, delicacy of thought, and robust wisdom. How came 
such men as King Alfred, and Roger Bacon, WiUiam of Wykeham, 
Walter Raleigh, Phihp Sidney, Isaac Newton, WiUiam Shakspeare, 
George Chapman, Francis Bacon, George Herbert, Henry Vane, to 
exist here ? What made these delicate natures ? was it the air ? was it 
the sea? was it the parentage? For it is certain that these men are 
samples of their contemporaries. The hearing ear is always found 
close to the speaking tongue; and no genius can long or often utter 
anything which is not invited and gladly entertained by men around 
him. 

It is a race, is it not ? that puts the hundred miUions of India under 
the dominion of a remote island in the north of Europe. Race avails 
much, if that be true, which is alleged, that all Celts are CathoUcs, 
and aU Saxons are Protestants; that Celts love unity of power, and 
Saxons the representative principle. Race is a controlling influence 
Ln the Jew, who, for two millenniums, under every climate, has 
preserved the same character and employments. Race in the negro 
is of appalhng importance. The French in Canada, cut o£E from 
all intercourse with the parent people, have held their national traits. 
I chanced to read Tacitus "on the Manners of the Germans," not 
long since, in Missouri, and the heart of IlUnois, and I found abun- 
dant points of resemblance between the Germans of the Hercynian 
forest, and our Hoosiers, Suc\ers, and Badgers of the American 
woods. 

But whilst race works immortally to keep its own, it is resisted 
by other forces. Civilization is a reagent, and eats away the old traits. 
The Arabs of to-day are the Arabs of Pharaoh; but the Briton of 
to-day is a very different person from Cassibelaunus or Ossian. Each 
religious sect has its physiognomy. The Methodists have acquired a 
face; the Quakers, a face; the nuns, a face. An EngUshman will pick 
out a dissenter by his manners. Trades and professions carve their 
own lines on face and form. Certain circumstances of English Ufe 



RACE 339 

are not less eflfective; as, personal liberty; plenty of food; good ale 
and mutton; open market, or good wages for every kind of labor? 
high bribes to talent and skill; the island life, or the million oppor- 
tunities and outlets for expanding and misplaced talent; readiness 
of combination among themselves for politics or for business; strikes; 
and sense of superiority founded on habit, of victory in labor and in 
war; and the appetite for superiority grows by feeding. 

It is easy to add to the counteracting forces to race. Credence is a 
main element. 'Tis said that the views of nature held by any people 
determine all their institutions. Whatever influences add to mental 
or moral faculty take men out of nationality, as out of other condi- 
tions, and make the national life a culpable compromise. 

These limitations of the formidable doctrine of race suggest others 
which threaten to undermine it, as not sufficiently based. The fixity 
or inconvertibleness of races as we see them is a weak argument for 
the eternity of these frail boundaries, since all our historical period is 
a point to the duration in which nature has wrought. Any the least 
and solitariest fact in our natural history, such as the melioration 
of fruits and of animal stocks, has the worth of a power in the 
opportunity of geologic periods. Moreover, though we flatter the 
self-love of men and nations by the legend of pure races, all our 
experience is of the gradation and resolution of races, and strange 
resemblances meet us everywhere. It need not puzzle us that 
Malay and Papuan, Celt and Roman, Saxon and Tartar, should 
mix, when we see the rudiments of tiger and baboon in our human 
form, and know that the barriers of races are not so firm, but that 
some spray sprinkles us from the antediluvian seas. 

The low organizations are simplest; a mere mouth, a jelly, or a 
straight worm. As the scale mounts, the organizations become 
complex. We are piqued with pure descent, but nature loves inocu- 
lation. A child blends in his face the faces of both parents, and some 
feature from every ancestor whose face hangs on the wall. The best 
nations are those most widely related; and navigation, as effecting 
a world-wide mixture, is the most potent advancer of nations. 

The English composite character betrays a mixed origin. Every- 
thing English is a fusion of distant and antagonistic elements. The 
language is mixed; the names of men are of different nations, — 



340 ENGLISH TRAITS 

three languages, three or four nations; — the currents of thought 
are counter: contemplation and practical skill; active intellect and 
dead conservatism; worldwide enterprise, and devoted use and wont; 
aggressive freedom and hospitable law, with bitter class-legislation; 
a people scattered by their wars and affairs over the face of the 
whole earth, and homesick to a man; a country of extremes, — dukes 
and chartists. Bishops of Durham and naked heathen colliers; noth- 
ing can be praised in it without damning exceptions, and nothing 
denounced without salvos of cordial praise. 

Neither do this people appear to be of one stem; but collectively a 
better race than any from which they are derived. Nor is it easy 
to trace it home to its original seats. Who can call by right names 
what races are in Britain? Who can trace them historically? Who 
can discriminate them anatomically, or metaphysically? 

In the impossibility of arriving at satisfaction on the historical 
question of race, and, — come of whatever disputable ancestry, — the 
indisputable Englishman before me, himself very well marked, and 
nowhere else to be found, — I fancied I could leave quite aside the 
choice of a tribe as his lineal progenitors. Defoe said in his wrath, 
"the Englishman was the mud of all races." I incline to the belief 
that, as water, lime, and sand make mortar, so certain temperaments 
marry well, and, by well-managed contrarieties, develop as drastic 
a character as the English. On the whole, it is not so much a history 
of one or of certain tribes of Saxons, or Frisians, coming from one 
place, and genetically identical, as it is an anthology of temperaments 
out of them all. Certain temperaments suit the sky and soil of 
England, say eight or ten or twenty varieties, as, out of a hundred 
pear trees, eight or ten suit the soil of an orchard, and thrive, whilst 
all the unadapted temperaments die out. 

The English derive their pedigree from such a range of nation- 
alities, that there needs sea-room and land-room to unfold the 
varieties of talent and character. Perhaps the ocean serves as a gal- 
vanic battery to distribute acids at one pole, and alkalies at the 
other. So England tends to accumulate her liberals in America, and 
her conservatives at London. The Scandinavians in her race still 
hear in every age the murmurs of their mother, the ocean; the Briton 
in the blood hugs the homestead still. 



RACE 341 

Again, as if to intensate the influences that are not of race, what 
we think of when we talk of Enghsh traits really narrows itself to 
a small district. It excludes Ireland, and Scotland, and Wales, and 
reduces itself at last to London, that is, to those who come and go 
thither. The portraits that hang on the walls in the Academy Exhi- 
bition at London, the figures in Punch's drawings of the public men, 
or of the club-houses, the prints in the shop windows, are distinctive 
English, and not American, no, nor Scotch, nor Irish; but 'tis a 
very restricted nationality. As you go north into the manufacturing 
and agricultural districts, and to the population that never travels, 
as you go into Yorkshire, as you enter Scotland, the world's English- 
man is no longer found. In Scotland, there is a rapid loss of all 
grandeur of mien and manners; a provincial eagerness and acuteness 
appear; the poverty of the country makes itself remarked, and a 
coarseness of manners; and, among the intellectual, is the insanity 
of dialectics. In Ireland are the same climate and soil as in England, 
but less food, no right relation to the land, political dependence, 
small tenantry, and an inferior or misplaced race. 

These queries concerning ancestry and blood may be well allowed, 
for there is no prosperity that seems more to depend on the kind of 
man than British prosperity. Only a hardy and wise people could 
have made this small territory great. We say, in a regatta or yacht- 
race, that if the boats are anywhere nearly matched, it is the man that 
wins. Put the best sailing master into either boat, and he will win. 

Yet it is fine for us to speculate in face of unbroken traditions, 
though vague, and losing themselves in fable. The traditions have 
got footing, and refused to be disturbed. The kitchen-clock is more 
convenient than sidereal time. We must use the popular category, 
as we do by the Linnaean classification, for convenience, and not as 
exact and final. Otherwise, we are presently confounded, when the 
best-settled traits of one race are claimed by some new ethnologist as 
precisely characteristic of the rival tribe. 

I found plenty of well-marked English types, the ruddy com- 
plexion, fair and plump, robust men, with faces cut like a die, and 
a strong island speech and accent; a Norman type, with a com- 
placency that belongs to that constitution. Others, who might be 
Americans, for anything that appeared in their complexion or form: 



342 ENGLISH TRAITS 

and their speech was much less marked, and their thought much 
less bound. We will call them Saxons. Then the Roman has im- 
planted his dark complexion in the trinity or quaternity of bloods. 

1. The sources from which tradition derives their stock are mainly 
three. And, first, they are of the oldest blood of the world, — the 
Celtic. Some peoples are deciduous or transitory. Where are the 
Greeks ? where the Etrurians ? where the Romans ? But the Celts or 
Sidonides are an old family, of whose beginning there is no memory, 
and their end is likely to be still more remote in the future; for they 
have endurance and productiveness. They planted Britain, and gave 
to the seas and mountains names which are poems, and imitate the 
pure voices of nature. They are favorably remembered in the oldest 
records of Europe. They had no violent feudal tenure, but the hus- 
bandman owned the land. They had an alphabet, astronomy, priestly 
culture, and a sublime creed. They have a hidden and precarious 
genius. They made the best popular literature of the Middle Ages 
in the songs of Merlin and the tender and delicious mythology of 
Arthur. 

2. The English come mainly from the Germans, whom the Rom- 
ans found hard to conquer in two hundred and ten years, — say, im- 
possible to conquer, — when one remembers the long sequel; a people 
about whom, in the old empire, the rumor ran, there was never any 
that meddled with them that repented it not. 

3. Charlemagne, halting one day in a town of Narbonnese Gaul, 
looked out of a window, and saw a fleet of Northmen cruising in 
the Mediterranean. They even entered the port of the town where he 
was, causing no small alarm and sudden manning and arming of 
his galleys. As they put out to sea again, the emperor gazed long 
after them, his eyes bathed in tears. "I am tormented with sorrow," 
he said, "when I foresee the evils they will bring on my posterity." 
There was reason for these Xerxes' tears. The men who have built a 
ship and invented the rig, — cordage, sail, compass, and pump, — ^the 
working in and out of port, have acquired much more than a ship. 
Now arm them, and every shore is at their mercy. For, if they have 
not numerical superiority where they anchor they have only to sail 
a mile or two to find it. Bonaparte's art of war, namely of concen- 



RACE 343 

trating force on the point of attack, must always be theirs who have 
the choice of the battle-ground. Of course they come into the fight 
from a higher ground of power than the land-nations; and can en- 
gage them on shore with a victorious advantage in the retreat. As 
soon as the shores are sufficiently peopled to make piracy a losing 
business, the same skill and courage are ready for the service of trade. 
The HeimskringlaJ or Sagas of the Kings of Norway, collected 
by Snorro Sturleson, is the lUad and Odyssey of English history. Its 
portraits, Uke Homer's, are strongly individuaHzed. The Sagas de- 
scribe a monarchical republic like Sparta. The government disappears 
before the importance of citizens. In Norway, no Persian masses 
fight and perish to aggrandize a king, but the actors are bonders or 
landholders, every one of whom is named and personally and patro- 
nymically described, as the king's friend and companion. A sparse 
population gives this high worth to every man. Individuals are 
often noticed as very handsome persons, which trait only brings the 
story nearer to the English race. Then the solid material interest 
predominates, so dear to English understanding, wherein the associ- 
ation is logical, between merit and land. The heroes of the Sagas 
are not the knights of South Europe. No vaporing of France and 
Spain has corrupted them. They are substantial farmers, whom the 
rough times have forced to defend their properties. They have 
weapons which they use in a determined manner, by no means for 
chivalry, but for their acres. They are people considerably advanced 
in rural arts, living amphibiously on a rough coast, and drawing 
half their food from the sea, and half from the land. They have 
herds of cows, and malt, wheat, bacon, butter, and cheese. They 
fish in the fiord, and hunt the deer. A king among these farmers 
has a varying power, sometimes not exceeding the authority of a 
sheriff. A king was maintained much as, in some of our country 
districts, a winter schoolmaster is quartered, a week here, a week 
there, and a fortnight on the next farm, — on all the farmers in rota- 
tion. This the king calls going into guest-quarters; and it was the 
only way in which, in a poor country, a poor king, with many re- 
tainers, could be kept alive, when he leaves his own farm to collect 
his dues through the kingdom. 

* Heimskringla. Translated by Samuel Laing, Esq. London, 1844. 



344 ENGLISH TRAITS 

These Norsemen are excellent persons in the main, with good 
sense, steadiness, wise speech, and prompt action. But they have a 
singular turn for homicide; their chief end of man is to murder, or 
to be murdered; oars, scythes, harpoons, crowbars, peatknives, and 
hayforks are tools valued by them all the more for their charming 
aptitude for assassinations. A pair of kings, after dinner, will divert 
themselves by thrusting each his sword through the other's body, 
as did Yngve and Alf. Another pair ride out on a morning for a 
frolic, and, finding no weapon near, will take the bits out of their 
horses' mouths, and crush each other's heads with them, as did 
Alric and Eric. The sight of a tent-cord or a cloak-string puts them 
on hanging somebody, a wife, or a husband, or, best of all, a king. 
If a farmer has so much as a hayfork, he sticks it into a King Dag. 
King Ingiald finds it vastly amusing to burn up half a dozen kings 
in a hall, after getting them drunk. Never was poor gentleman so 
surfeited with life, so furious to be rid of it, as the Northman. If he 
cannot pick any other quarrel, he will get himself comfortably gored 
by a bull's horns, like Egil, or slain by a landslide, like the agricul- 
tural King Onund. Odin died in his bed, in Sweden; but it was 
a proverb of ill condition, to die the death of old age. King Hake 
of Sweden cuts and slashes in battle, as long as he can stand, then 
orders his war-ship, loaded with his dead men and their weapons, 
to be taken out to sea, the tiller shipped, and the sails spread; being 
left alone, he sets fire to some tarwood, and lies down contented on 
deck. The wind blew off the land, the ship flew burning in clear 
flame, out between the islets into the ocean, and there was the right 
end of King Hake. 

The early Sagas are sanguinary and piratical; the later are of a 
noble strain. History rarely yields us better passages than the con- 
versation between King Sigurd the Crusader and King Eystein, his 
brother, on their respective merits, — one, the soldier, and the other, 
a lover of the arts of peace. 

But the reader of the Norman history must steel himself by hold- 
ing fast the remote compensations which result from animal vigor. 
As the old fossil world shows that the first steps of reducing the chaos 
were confided to saurians and other huge and horrible animals, so 



RACE 345 

the foundations of the new civiHty were to be laid by the most 
savage men. 

The Normans came out of France into England worse men than 
they went into it, one hundred and sixty years before. They had 
lost their own language, and learned the Romance or barbarous 
Latin of the Gauls; and had acquired, with the language, all the 
vices it had names for. The conquest has obtained in the chronicles 
the name of the "memory of sorrow." Twenty thousand thieves 
landed at Hastings. These founders of the House of Lords were 
greedy and ferocious dragoons, sons of greedy and ferocious pirates. 
They were all alike, they took everything they could carry, they 
burned, harried, violated, tortured, and killed, until everything Eng- 
lish was wrought to the verge of ruin. Such, however, is the illusion 
of antiquity and wealth, that decent and dignified men now existing 
boast their descent from these filthy thieves, who showed a far juster 
conviction of their own merits, by assuming for their types the 
swine, goat, jackal, leopard, wolf, and snake, which they severally 
resembled. 

England yielded to the Danes and Northmen in the tenth and 
eleventh centuries, and was the receptacle into which all the mettle 
of that strenuous population was poured. The continued draught 
of the best men in Norway, Sweden, and Denmark to these piratical 
expeditions, exhausted those countries, like a tree which bears much 
fruit when young, and these have been second-rate powers ever since. 
The power of the race migrated, and left Norway void. King Olaf 
said, "When King Harold, my father, went westward to England, 
the chosen men in Norway followed him: but Norway was so 
emptied then, that such men have not since been to find in the 
country, nor especially such a leader as King Harold was for wis- 
dom and bravery." 

It was a tardy recoil of these invasions, when, in 1801, the British 
government sent Nelson to bombard the Danish forts in the Sound; 
and, in 1807, Lord Cathcart, at Copenhagen, took the entire Danish 
fleet, as it lay in the basins, and all the equipments from the Arsenal, 
and carried them to England. Konghelle, the town where the kings 
of Norway, Sweden, and Denmark were wont to meet, is now rented 
to a private English gentleman for a hunting ground. 



346 ENGLISH TRAITS 

It took many generations to trim, and comb, and f)er£ume the 
first boat-load of Norse pirates into royal highnesses and most noble 
Knights of the Garter: but every sparkle of ornament dates back to 
the Norse boat. There will be time enough to mellow this strength 
into civility and religion. It is a medical fact that the children of the 
bhnd see; the children of felons have a healthy conscience. Many a 
mean, dastardly boy is, at the age of puberty, transformed in a 
serious and generous youth. 

The mildness of the following ages has not quite effaced these 
traits of Odin; as the rudiment of a structure matured in the tiger 
is said to be still found unabsorbed in the Caucasian man. The 
nation has a tough, acrid, animal nature, which centuries of church- 
ing and civihzing have not been able to sweeten. Alfieri said, "The 
crimes of Italy were the proof of the superiority of the stock;" and 
one may say of England that this watch moves on a splinter of 
adamant. The English uncultured are a brutal nation. The crimes 
recorded in their calendars leave nothing to be desired in the way 
of cold malignity. Dear to the English heart is a fair standup fight. 
The brutality of the manners in the lower class appears in the boxing, 
bear-baiting, cock-fighting, love of executions, and in the readiness 
for a set-to in the streets, delightful to the English of all classes. The 
costermongers of London streets hold cowardice in loathing: — "We 
must work our lists well; we are all handy with our fists." The 
pubhc schools are charged with being bear-gardens of brutal strength, 
and are liked by the people for that cause. The fagging is a trait 
of the same quality. Medwin, in the Life of Shelley, relates that, 
at a military school, they rolled up a young man in a snowball, and 
left him so in his room, while the other cadets went to church; — 
and crippled him for life. They have retained impressment, deck- 
flogging, army-flogging, and school-flogging. Such is the ferocity of 
the army discipline, that a soldier sentenced to flogging, sometimes 
prays that his sentence may be commuted to death. Flogging, ban- 
ished from the armies of Western Europe, remains here by the sanc- 
tion of the Duke of Wellington. The right of the husband to sell 
the wife has been retained down to our times. The Jews have been 
the favorite victims of royal and popular persecution. Henry III. 
mortgaged all the Jews in the kingdom to his brother, the Earl 



RACE 347 

of Cornwall, as security for money which he borrowed. The torture 
of criminals, and the rack for extorting evidence, were slowly dis- 
used. Of the criminal statutes, Sir Samuel Romilly said, "I have 
examined the codes of all nations, and ours is the worst, and worthy 
of the Anthropophagi." In the last session, the House of Commons 
was hstening to details of flogging and torture pracdsed in the jails. 

As soon as this land, thus geographically posted, got a hardy people 
into it, they could not help becoming the sailors and factors of the 
globe. From childhood, they dabbled in water, they swum hke 
fishes, their playthings were boats. In the case of the shifvmoney, 
the judges delivered it for law, that "England being an island, the 
very midland shires therein are all to be accounted maritime;" and 
Fuller adds, "the genius even of landlocked coundes driving the 
nadves with a maritime dexterity." As early as the conquest, it is 
remarked in explanation of the wealth of England, that its merchants 
trade to all countries. 

The EngHsh, at the present day, have great vigor of body and 
endurance. Other countrymen look sHght and undersized beside 
them, and invalids. They are bigger men than the Americans. I sup- 
pose a hundred English taken at random out of the street, would 
weigh a fourth more than so many Americans. Yet, I am told, the 
skeleton is not larger. They are round, ruddy and handsome; at 
least, the whole bust is well formed; and there is a tendency to stout 
and powerful frames. I remarked the stoutness, on my first landing 
at Liverpool; porter, drayman, coachman, guard, — ^what substantial, 
respectable, grandfatherly figures, with costume and manners to 
suit. The American has arrived at the old mansion-house, and finds 
himself among uncles, aunts, and grandsires. The pictures on the 
chimney-tiles of his nursery were pictures of these people. Here they 
are in the identical costumes and air which so took him. 

It is the fault of their forms that they grow stocky, and the women 
have that disadvantage, — few tall, slender figures of flowing shapes, 
but stunted and thickset persons. The French say that the EngUsh 
women have two left hands. But, in all ages, they are a handsome 
race. The bronze monuments of crusaders lying cross-legged, in 
the Temple Church at London, and those in Worcester and in Salis- 
bury Cathedrals, which are seven hundred years old, are of the same 



34^ ENGLISH TRAITS 

type as the best youthful heads of men now in England; — please by 
beauty of the same character, an expression blending good nature, 
valor, and refinement, and, mainly, by that uncorrupt youth in the 
face of manhood, which is daily seen in the streets of London. 

Both branches of the Scandinavian race are distinguished for 
beauty. The anecdote of the handsome captives which Saint Gregory 
found at Rome, a. d. 600, is matched by the testimony of the Norman 
chroniclers, five centuries later, who wondered at the beauty and 
long flowing hair of the young Enghsh captives. Meantime, the 
Heimskringla has frequent occasion to speak of the personal beauty 
of its heroes. When it is considered what humanity, what resources 
of mental and moral power, the traits of the blond race betoken, — its 
accession to empire marks a new and finer epoch, wherein the old 
mineral force shall be subjugated at last by humanity, and shall 
plough in its furrow henceforward. It is not a final race, once a crab 
always a crab, but a race with a future. 

On the Enghsh face are combined decision and nerve, with the 
fair complexion, blue eyes, and open and florid aspect. Hence the 
love of truth, hence the sensibility, the fine perception, and poetic 
construction. The fair Saxon man, with open front, and honest 
meaning, domestic, affectionate, is not the wood out of which can- 
nibal, or inquisitor, or assassin is made, but he is moulded for law, 
lawful trade, civility, marriage, the nurture of children, for colleges, 
churches, charities, and colonies. 

They are rather manly than warlike. When the war is over, the 
mask falls from the affectionate and domestic tastes, which make 
them women in kindness. This union of qualities is fabled in their 
national legend of Beauty and the Beast, or long before, in the Greek 
legend of Hermaphrodite. The two sexes are co-present in the Eng- 
lish mind. I apply to Britannia, queen of seas and colonies, the 
words in which her latest novelist portrays his heroine: "She is as 
mild as she is game, and as game as she is mild." The English de- 
light in the antagonism which combines in one person the extremes 
of courage and tenderness. Nelson, dying at Trafalgar, sends his 
love to Lord Collingwood, and, like an innocent schoolboy that goes 
to bed, says, "Kiss me. Hardy," and turns to sleep. Lord Colling- 
wood, his comrade, was of a nature the most affectionate and 



RACE 349 

domestic. Admiral Rodney's figure approached to delicacy and 
effeminacy, and he declared himself very sensible to fear, which he 
surmounted only by considerations of honor and public duty. Claren- 
don says, the Duke of Buckingham was so modest and gentle, that 
some courtiers attempted to put affronts on him, until they found 
that this modesty and effeminacy was only a mask for the most 
terrible determination. And Sir James Parry said, the other day, of 
Sir John FrankUn, that, "if he found Wellington Sound open, he 
explored it; for he was a man who never turned his back on a danger, 
yet of that tenderness, that he would not brush away a mosquito." 
Even for their highwaymen the same virtue is claimed, and Robin 
Hood comes described to us as mitissimus prcedonum, the gentlest 
thief. But they know where their wardogs lie. Cromwell, Blake, 
Marlborough, Chatham, Nelson, and Wellington are not to be trifled 
with, and the brutal strength which hes at the bottom of society, 
the animal ferocity of the quays and cockpits, the bullies of the 
costermongers of Shoreditch, Seven Dials, and Spitalfields, they 
know how to wake up. 

They have a vigorous health, and last well into middle and old 
age. The old men are as red as roses, and still handsome. A clear 
skin, a peachbloom complexion, and good teeth are found all over 
the island. They use a plentiful and nutritious diet. The operative 
cannot subsist on water-cresses. Beef, mutton, wheatbread, and malt- 
liquors are universal among the first-class laborers. Good feeding 
is a chief point of national pride among the vulgar, and, in their 
caricatures, they represent the Frenchman as a poor, starved body. 
It is curious that Tacitus found the English beer already in use 
among the Germans: "They make from barley or wheat a drink 
corrupted into some resemblance to wine." Lord Chief Justice For- 
tescue, in Henry VI.'s time, says, "The inhabitants of England drink 
no water, unless at certain times, on a religious score, and by way 
of penance." The extremes of poverty and ascetic penance, it would 
seem, never reach cold water in England. Wood, the antiquary, in 
describing the poverty and maceration of Father Lacey, an English 
Jesuit, does not deny him beer. He says, "His bed was under a 
thatching, and the way to it up a ladder; his fare was coarse; his 
drink, of a penny a gawn, or gallon." 



350 ENGLISH TRAITS 

They have more constitutional energy than any other people. 
They think, with Henri Quatre, that manly exercises are the founda- 
tion of that elevation of mind w^hich gives one nature ascendant 
over another; or, with the Arabs, that the days spent in the chase 
are not counted in the length of life. They box, run, shoot, ride, 
row, and sail from pole to pole. They eat, and drink, and live jolly 
in the open air, putting a bar of solid sleep between day and day. 
They walk and ride as fast as they can, their head bent forward, 
as if urged on some pressing affair. The French say that Englishmen 
in the street always walk straight before them, like mad dogs. Men 
and women walk with infatuation. As soon as he can handle a gun, 
hunting is the fine art of every Englishman of condition. They are 
the most voracious people of prey that ever existed. Every season 
turns out the aristocracy into the country, to shoot and fish. The 
more vigorous run out of the island to Europe, to America, to Asia, 
to Africa, and Australia, to hunt with fury by gun, by trap, by har- 
poon, by lasso; with dog, with horse, with elephant, or with drome- 
dary, all the game that is in nature. These men have written the 
game-books of all countries, as Hawker, Scrope, Murray, Herbert, 
Maxwell, Gumming, and a host of travellers. The people at home 
are addicted to boxing, running, leaping, and rowing matches. 

I suppose, the dogs and horses must be thanked for the fact that 
the men have muscles almost as tough and supple as their own. If 
in every efficient man there is first a fine animal, in the English race 
it is of the best breed, a wealthy, juicy, broad-chested creature, 
steeped in ale and good cheer, and a little overloaded by his flesh. 
Men of animal nature rely, like animals, on their instincts. The 
Enghshman associates well with dogs and horses. His attachment 
to the horse arises from the courage and address required to manage 
it. The horse finds out who is afraid of it, and does not disguise 
its opinion. Their young boiling clerks and lusty collegians like the 
company of horses better than the company of professors. I suppose 
the horses are better company for them. The horse has more uses 
than Buflon noted. If you go into the streets, every driver in 'bus 
or dray is a bully, and, if I wanted a good troop of soldiers I should 
recruit among the stables. Add a certain degree of refinement to 



RACE 351 

the vivacity of these riders, and you obtain the precise quality which 
makes the men and women of poUte society formidable. 

They come honestly by their horsemanship, with Hengst and 
Horsa for their Saxon founders. The other branch of their race 
had been Tartar nomads. The horse was all their wealth. The chil- 
dren were fed on mares' milk. The pastures of Tartary were still 
remembered by the tenacious practice of the Norsemen to eat horse- 
flesh at religious feasts. In the Danish invasions, the marauders 
seized upon horses where they landed, and were at once converted 
into a body of expert cavalry. 

At one time this skill seems to have declined. Two centuries ago 
the English horse never performed any eminent service beyond the 
seas; and the reason assigned was that the genius of the English 
hath always more inclined them to foot-service, as pure and proper 
manhood, without any mixture; whilst, in a victory on horseback, 
the credit ought to be divided betwixt the man and his horse. But 
in two hundred years a change has taken place. Now, they boast 
that they understand horses better than any people in the world, and 
that their horses are become their second selves. 

"William the Conqueror being," says Camden, "better affected to 
beasts than to men, imposed heavy fines and punishments on those 
that should meddle with his game." The Saxon Chronicle says, 
"He loved the tall deer as if he were their father." And rich Eng- 
lishmen have followed his example, according to their abiHty, ever 
since, in encroaching on the tillage and commons with their game- 
preserves. It is a proverb in England that it is safer to shoot a man 
than a hare. The severity of the game-laws certainly indicates an 
extravagant sympathy of the nation with horses and hunters. The 
gentlemen are always on horseback, and have brought horses to an 
ideal perfection, — the English racer is a factitious breed. A score or 
two of mounted gentlemen may frequently be seen running like 
centaurs down a hill nearly as steep as the roof of a house. Every 
inn-room is lined with pictures of races; telegraphs communicate, 
every hour, tidings of the heats from Newmarket and Ascot: and 
the House of Commons adjourns over the "Derby Day." 



352 ENGLISH TRAITS 

CHAPTER V 



The Saxon and the Northman are both Scandinavians, History 
does not allow us to fix the limits of the application of these names 
with any accuracy; but from the residence of a portion of these 
people in France, and from some effect of that powerful soil on 
their blood and manners, the Norman has come popularly to repre- 
sent in England the aristocratic, — and the Saxon the democratic 
principle. And though, I doubt not, the nobles are of both tribes, 
and the workers of both, yet we are forced to use the names a little 
mythically, one to represent the worker, and the other the enjoyer. 

The island was a prize for the best race. Each of the dominant 
races tried its fortune in turn. The Phoenician, the Celt, and the 
Goth had already got in. The Roman came, but in the very day 
when his fortune culminated. He looked in the eyes of a new people 
that was to supplant his own. He disembarked his legions, erected 
his camps and towers, — presently he heard bad news from Italy, and 
worse and worse, every year; at last, he made a handsome compli- 
ment of roads and walls, and departed. But the Saxon seriously 
settled in the land, builded, tilled, fished, and traded, with German 
truth and adhesiveness. The Dane came, and divided with him. 
Last of all, the Norman, or French-Dane, arrived, and formally con- 
quered, harried, and ruled the kingdom. A century later, it came 
out that the Saxon had the most bottom and longevity, had managed 
to make the victor speak the language and accept the law and usage 
of the victim; forced the baron to dictate Saxon terms to Norman 
kings; and, step by step, got all the essential securities of civil liberty 
invented and confirmed. The genius of the race and the genius 
of the place conspired to this effect. The island is lucrative to free 
labor, but not worth possession on other terms. The race was so 
intellectual, that a feudal or military tenure could not last longer 
than the war. The power of the Saxon-Danes so thoroughly beaten 
in the war that the name of English and villein were synonymous, 
yet so vivacious as to extort charters from the kings, stood on the 
strong personality of these people. Sense and economy must rule in 



ABILITY 353 

a world which is made of sense and economy, and the banker, widi 
his seven per cent, drives the earl out of his castle. A nobility of 
soldiers cannot keep down a commonalty of shrewd scientific per- 
sons. What signifies a pedigree of a hundred links, against a cotton- 
spinner with steam in his mill; or, against a company of broad- 
shouldered Liverpool merchants, for whom Stephenson and Brunei 
are contriving locomotives and a tubular bridge? 

These Saxons are the hands of mankind. They have the taste for 
toil, a distaste for pleasure or repose, and the telescopic appreciation 
of distant gain. They are the wealthmakers, — and by dint of mental 
faculty, which has its own conditions. The Saxon works after liking, 
or, only for himself; and to set him at work, and to begin to draw 
his monstrous values out of barren Britain, all dishonor, fret, and 
barrier must be removed, and then his energies begin to play. 

The Scandinavian fancied himself surrounded by Trolls, — a kind 
of goblin men, with vast power of work and skilful production, — 
divine stevedores, carpenters, reapers, smiths, and masons, swift to 
reward every kindness done them, with gifts of gold and silver. In 
all English history, this dream comes to pass. Certain Trolls or 
working brains, under the names of Alfred, Bede, Caxton, Bracton, 
Camden, Drake, Selden, Dugdale, Newton, Gibbon, Brindley, Watt, 
Wedgwood, dwell in the troll-mounts of Britain, and turn the sweat 
of their face to power and renown. 

If the race is good, so is the place. Nobody landed on this spell- 
bound island with impunity. The enchantments of barren shingle 
and rough weather transformed every adventurer into a laborer. 
Each vagabond that arrived bent his neck to the yoke of gain, or 
found the air too tense for him. The strong survived, the weaker 
went to the ground. Even the pleasure-hunters and sots of England 
are of a tougher texture. A hard temperature had been formed by 
Saxon and Saxon-Dane, and such of these French or Normans as 
could reach it were naturalized in every sense. 

All the admirable expedients or means hit upon in England must 
be looked at as growths or irresistible offshoots of the expanding 
mind of the race. A man of that brain thinks and acts thus; and 
his neighbor, being afflicted with the same kind of brain, though he 
is rich, and called a baron, or a duke, thinks the same thing, and is 



354 ENGLISH TRAITS 

ready to allow the justice of the thought and act in his retainer or 
tenant, though sorely against his baronial or ducal will. 

The island was renowned in antiquity for its breed of mastiffs, so 
fierce that, when their teeth were set, you must cut their heads off 
to part them. The man was like his dog. The people have that 
nervous bilious temperament, which is known by medical men to 
resist every means employed to make its possessor subservient to the 
will of others. The English game is main force to main force, the 
planting of foot to foot, fair play and open field, — a rough tug with- 
out trick or dodging, till one or both come to pieces. King Ethel- 
wald spoke the language of his race, when he planted himself at 
Wimborne, and said, "he would do one of two things, or there Hve, 
or there lie." They hate craft and subtlety. They neither poison, nor 
waylay, nor assassinate; and when they have pounded each other 
to a poultice, they will shake hands and be friends for the remainder 
of their lives. 

You shall trace these Gothic touches at school, at country fairs, 
at the hustings, and in Parliament. No artifice, no breach of truth 
and plain dealing, — not so much as secret ballot, is sufifered in the 
island. In ParUament, the tactics of the opposition is to resist every 
step of the government, by a pitiless attack: and in a bargain, no 
prospect of advantage is so dear to the merchant, as the thought of 
being tricked is mortifying. 

Sir Kenelm Digby, a courtier of Charles and James who won the 
sea-fight of Scanderoon, was a model Englishman in his day. "His 
person was handsome and gigantic, he had so graceful elocution 
and noble address that, had he been dropt out of the clouds in any 
part of the world, he would have made himself respected: he was 
skilled in six tongues, and master of arts and arms."^ Sir Kenelm 
wrote a book, "Of Bodies and of Souls," in which he propounds 
that "Syllogisms do breed or rather are all the variety of man's life. 
They are the steps by which we walk in all our businesses. Man, 
as he is man, doth nothing else but weave such chains. Whatsoever 
he doth, swarving from this work, he doth as deficient from the 
nature of man: and, if he do aught beyond this, by breaking out into 
divers sorts of exterior actions, he findeth, nevertheless, in this linked 

^ Antony Wood. 



ABILITY 355 

sequel of simple discourses, the art, the cause, the rule, the bounds, 
and the model of it."^ 

There spoke the genius of the English people. There is a necessity 
on them to be logical. They would hardly greet the good that did 
not logically fall, — as if it excluded their own merit, or shook their 
understandings. They are jealous of minds that have much facility 
of association, from an instinctive fear that the seeing many relations 
to their thought might impair this serial continuity and lucrative 
concentration. They are impatient of genius, or of minds addicted 
to contemplation, and cannot conceal their contempt for saUies of 
thought, however lawful, whose steps they cannot count by their 
wonted rule. Neither do they reckon better a syllogism that ends in 
syllogism. For they have a supreme eye to facts, and theirs is a logic 
that brings salt to soup, hammer to nail, oar to boat, the logic of 
cooks, carpenters, and chemists, following the sequence of nature, 
and one on which words make no impression. Their mind is not 
dazzled by its own means, but locked and bolted to results. They 
love men who, like Samuel Johnson, a doctor in the schools, would 
jump out of his syllogism the instant his major proposition was in 
danger, to save that, at all hazards. The practical vision is spacious, 
and they can hold many threads without entangling them. All the 
steps they orderly take; but with the high logic of never confounding 
the minor and major proposition; keeping their eye on their aim, in 
all the complicity and delay incident to the several series of means 
they employ. There is room in their minds for this and that, — a 
science of degrees. In the courts, the independence of the judges and 
the loyalty of the suitors are equally excellent. In Parliament, they 
have hit on that capital invention of freedom, a constitutional oppo- 
sition. And when courts and Parliament are both deaf, the plaintiff 
is not silenced. Calm, patient, his weapon of defence from year to 
year is the obstinate reproduction of the grievance with calculations 
and estimates. But, meantime, he is drawing numbers and money 
to his opinion, resolved that if all remedy fails, right of revolution 
is at the bottom of his charter-box. They are bound to see their 
measure carried, and stick to it through ages of defeat. 

Into this English logic, however, an infusion of justice enters, not 

^ Man's Soule, p. 29. 



356 ENGLISH TRAITS 

so apparent in other races, — a belief in the existence of two sides, 
and the resolution to see fair play. There is on every question an 
appeal from the assertion of the parties to the proof of what is as- 
serted. They are impious in their scepticism of a theory, but kiss 
the dust before a fact. Is it a machine, is it a charter, is it a boxer 
in the ring, is it a candidate on the hustings, — the universe of Eng- 
lishmen will suspend their judgment until the trial can be had. They 
are not to be led by a phrase, they want a working plan, a working 
machine, a working constitution, and will sit out the trial, and abide 
by the issue, and reject all preconceived theories. In politics they 
put blunt questions, which must be answered; who is to pay the 
taxes.? what will you do for trade.? what for corn.? what for the 



spmner 



This singular fairness and its results strike the French with sur- 
prise. Philip de Commines says, "Now, in my opinion, among all 
the sovereignties I know in the world, that in which the public good 
is best attended to, and the least violence exercised on the people, 
is that of England." Life is safe, and personal rights; and what is 
freedom, without security ? whilst, in France, "fraternity," "equality," 
and "indivisible unity," are names for assassination. Montesquieu 
said "England is the freest country in the world. If a man in Eng- 
land had as many enemies as hairs on his head, no harm would 
happen to him." 

Their self-respect, their faith in causation, and their realistic logic 
or coupling of means to ends, have given them the leadership of 
the modern world. Montesquieu said, "No people have true com- 
mon sense but those who are born in England." This common sense 
is a perception of all the conditions of our earthly existence, of laws 
that can be stated, and of laws that cannot be stated, or that are 
learned only by practice, in which allowance for friction is made. 
They are impious in their scepticism of theory, and in high depart- 
ments they are cramped and sterile. But the unconditional surrender 
to facts, and the choice of means to reach their ends, are as admirable 
as with ants and bees. 

The bias of the nation is a passion for utility. They love the lever, 
the screw, and pulley, the Flanders draught-horse, the water-fall, 
wind-mills, tide-mills; the sea and the wind to bear their freight 



ABILITY 357 

ships. More than the diamond Koh-i-noor, which glitters among 
their crown jewels, they prize that dull pebble which is wiser than 
a man, whose poles turn themselves to the poles of the world, and 
whose axis is parallel to the axis of the world. Now, their toys are 
steam and galvanism. They are heavy at the fine arts, but adroit at 
the coarse; not good in jewelry or mosaics, but the best iron-masters, 
colliers, wool-combers, and tanners in Europe. They apply them- 
selves to agriculture, to draining, to resisting encroachments of sea, 
wind, travelling sands, cold and wet subsoil; to fishery, to manufac- 
ture of indispensable staples, — salt, plumbago, leather, wool, glass, 
pottery, and brick, — to bees and silkworms; — and by their steady 
combinations they succeed. A manufacturer sits down to dinner in 
a suit of clothes which was wool on a sheep's back at sunrise. You 
dine with a gentleman on venison, pheasant, quail, pigeons, poultry, 
mushrooms, and pine-apples, all the growth of his estate. They are 
neat husbands for ordering all their tools pertaining to house and 
field. All are well kept. There is no want and no waste. They study 
use and fitness in their building, in the order of their dwellings, 
and in their dress. The Frenchman invented the ruffle, the English- 
man added the shirt. The Englishman wears a sensible coat but- 
toned to the chin, of rough but solid and lasting texture. If he is 
a lord, he dresses a little worse than a commoner. They have diffused 
the taste for plain substantial hats, shoes, and coats through Europe. 
They think him the best dressed man, whose dress is so fit for his 
use that you cannot notice or remember to describe it. 

They secure the essentials in their diet, in their arts, and manu- 
factures. Every article of cutlery shows, in its shape, thought and 
long experience of workmen. They put the expense in the right 
place, as, in their sea-steamers, in the solidity of the machinery and 
the strength of the boat. The admirable equipment of their arctic 
ships carries London to the pole. They build roads, aqueducts, warm 
and ventilate houses. And they have impressed their directness and 
practical habit on modern civilization. 

In trade, the Englishman believes that nobody breaks who ought 
not to break; and that, if he do not make trade everything, it will 
make him nothing; and acts on this belief. The spirit of system, 
attention to details, and the subordination of details, or the not 



358 ENGLISH TRAITS 

driving things too finely (which is charged on the Germans), con- 
stitute that despatch of business which makes the mercantile power 
of England. 

In war, the Enghshman looks to his means. He is of the opinion 
of Civilis, his German ancestor, whom Tacitus reports as holding 
"that the gods are on the side of the strongest;" — a sentence which 
Bonaparte unconsciously translated, when he said, "that he had 
noticed, that Providence always favored the heaviest battalion." 
Their military science propounds that if the weight of the advancing 
column is greater than that of the resisting, the latter is destroyed. 
Therefore Wellington, when he came to the army in Spain, had 
every man weighed, first with accoutrements, and then without; be- 
lieving that the force of an army depended on the weight and power 
of the individual soldiers, in spite of cannon. Lord Palmerston told 
the House of Commons that more care is taken of the health and 
comfort of English troops than of any other troops in the world, 
and that hence the English can put more men into the rank, on the 
day of action, on the field of battle, than any other army. Before 
the bombardment of the Danish forts in the Baltic, Nelson spent 
day after day, himself in the boats, on the exhausting service of 
sounding the channel. Clerk of Eldin's celebrated manoeuvre of 
breaking the line of sea-battle, and Nelson's feat of doubling, or 
stationing his ships one on the outer bow, and another on the outer 
quarter of each of the enemy's, were only translations into naval 
tactics of Bonaparte's rule of concentration. Lord Collingwood 
was accustomed to tell his men that, if they could fire three well- 
directed broadsides in five minutes, no vessel could resist them; 
and, from constant practice, they came to do it in three minutes 
and a half. 

But conscious that no race of better men exists, they rely most on 
the simplest means; and do not like ponderous and difficult tactics, 
but delight to bring the affair hand to hand, where the victory lies 
with the strength, courage, and endurance of the individual com- 
batants. They adopt every improvement in rig, in motor, in weapons, 
but they fundamentally believe that the best stratagem in naval war 
is to lay your ship close alongside of the enemy's ship, and bring all 
your guns to bear on him, until you or he go to the bottom. This 



ABILITY 359 

is the old fashion, which never goes out of fashion, neither in nor 
out of England. 

It is not usually a point of honor, nor a religious sentiment, and 
never any whim that they will shed their blood for; but usually 
property, and right measured by property, that breeds revolution. 
They have no Indian taste for a tomahawk-dance, no French taste 
for a badge or a proclamation. The Englishman is peaceably mind- 
ing his business, and earning his day's wages. But if you offer to lay 
hand on his day's wages, on his cow, or his right in common, or his 
shop, he will fight to the Judgment. Magna-charta, jury-trial, habeas- 
corpus, star-chamber, ship-money. Popery, Plymouth-colony, Amer- 
ican Revolution, are all questions involving a yeoman's right to his 
dinner, and, except as touching that, would not have lashed the 
British nation to rage and revolt. 

Whilst they are thus instinct with a spirit of order, and of calcula- 
tion, it must be owned they are capable of larger views; but the 
indulgence is expensive to them, cost great crises, or accumulations 
of mental power. In common the horse works best with blinders. 
Nothing is more in the line of English thought, than our unvar- 
nished Connecticut question, "Pray, sir, how do you get your living 
when you are at home?" — The questions of freedom, of taxation, of 
privilege, are money questions. Heavy fellows, steeped in beer and 
fleshpots, they are hard of hearing and dim of sight. Their drowsy 
minds need to be flagellated by war and trade and politics and 
persecution. They cannot well read a principle, except by the light 
of fagots and of burning towns. 

Tacitus says of the Germans, "Powerful only in sudden efforts, 
they are impatient of toil and labor." This highly destined race, if 
it had not somewhere added the chamber of patience to its brain, 
would not have built London. I know not from which of the tribes 
and temperaments that went to the composition of the people this 
tenacity was supplied, but they cHnch every nail they drive. They 
had no running for luck, and no immoderate speed. They spend 
largely on their fabric, and await the slow return. Their leather lies 
tanning seven years in the vat. At Rogers's mills, in Sheffield, where 
I was shown the process of making a razor and a penknife, I was 
told there is no luck in making good steel; that they make no mis- 



360 ENGLISH TRAITS 

takes, every blade in the hundred and in the thousand is good. And 
that is characteristic of all their work, — no more is attempted than 
is done. 

When Thor and his companions arrive at Utgard,he is told that 
"nobody is permitted to remain here, unless he understand some art, 
and excel in it all other men." The same question is still put to the 
posterity of Thor. A nation of laborers, every man is trained to 
some one art or detail, and aims at perfection in that; not content 
unless he has something in which he thinks he surpasses all other 
men. He would rather not do anything at all, than not do it well. 
I suppose no people have such thoroughness; — from the highest to 
the lowest, every man meaning to be master of his art. 

"To show capacity," a Frenchman described as the end of a speech 
in debate: "No," said an Englishman, "but to set your shoulder at 
the wheel, — to advance the business." Sir Samuel Romilly refused 
to speak in popular assemblies, confining himself to the House of 
Commons, where a measure can be carried by a speech. The busi- 
ness of the House of Commons is conducted by a few persons, but 
these are hard-worked. Sir Robert Peel "knew the Blue Books by 
heart." His colleagues and rivals carry Hansard in their heads. The 
high civil and legal offices are not beds of ease, but posts which exact 
frightful amounts of mental labor. Many of our great leaders, like 
Pitt, Canning, Castlereagh, Romilly, are soon worked to death. They 
are excellent judges in England of a good worker, and when they 
find one like Clarendon, Sir Philip Warwick, Sir William Coventry, 
Ashley, Burke, Thurlow, Mansfield, Pitt, Eldon, Peel, or Russell, 
there is nothing too good or too high for him. 

They have a wonderful heat in the pursuit of a public aim. Private 
persons exhibit, in scientific and antiquarian researches, the same 
pertinacity as the nation showed in the coalitions in which it yoked 
Europe against the empire of Bonaparte, one after the other defeated, 
and still renewed, until the sixth hurled him from his seat. 

Sir John Herschel, in completion of the work of his father, who 
had made the catalogue of the stars of the northern hemisphere, 
expatriated himself for years at the Cape of Good Hope, finished 
his inventory of the southern heaven, came home, and redacted it 
in eight years more; — a work whose value does not begin until 



ABILITY 361 

thirty years have elapsed, and thenceforward a record to all ages 
of the highest import. The Admiralty sent out the Arctic expedi- 
tions year after year, in search of Sir John Franklin, until, at last, 
they have threaded their way through polar pack and Behring's 
Straits, and solved the geographical problem. Lord Elgin, at Athens, 
saw the imminent ruin of the Greek remains, set up his scaffoldings, 
in spite of epigrams, and, after five years' labor to collect them, 
got his marbles on shipboard. The ship struck a rock, and went 
to the bottom. He had them all fished up, by divers, at a vast 
expense, and brought to London : not knowing that Haydon, Fuseli, 
and Canova, and all good heads in all the world, were to be his 
applauders. In the same spirit were the excavation and research by 
Sir Charles Fellowes, for the Xanthian monument; and of Layard, 
for his Nineveh sculptures. 

The nation sits in the immense city they have builded, a London 
extended into every man's mind, though he live in Van Dieman's 
Land or Capetown. Faithful performance of what is undertaken to 
be performed, they honor in themselves, and exact in others, as cer- 
tificate of equality with themselves. The modern world is theirs. 
They have made and make it day by day. The commercial relations 
of the world are so intimately drawn to London, that every dollar 
on earth contributes to the strength of the English government. 
And if all the wealth in the planet should perish by war or deluge, 
they know themselves competent to replace it. 

They have approved their Saxon blood, by their sea-going qual- 
ities; their descent from Odin's smiths, by their hereditary skill in 
working in iron; their British birth, by husbandry and immense 
wheat harvests; and justified their occupancy of the centre of habit- 
able land, by their supreme ability and cosmopolitan spirit. They 
have tilled, builded, forged, spun, and woven. They have made the 
island a thoroughfare; and London a shop, a law-court, a record- 
office, and scientific bureau, inviting to strangers; a sanctuary to 
refugees of every political and religious opinion; and such a city, 
that almost every active man, in any nation, finds himself, at one 
time or other, forced to visit it. 

In every path of practical activity, they have gone even with the 
best. There is no secret of war, in which they have not shown 



362 ENGLISH TRAITS 

mastery. The steam-chamber of Watt, the locomotive of Stephenson, 
the cotton-mule of Roberts, perform the labor of the world. There 
is no department of Uterature, of science, or of useful art, in which 
they have not produced a first-rate book. It is England, whose 
opinion is waited for on the merit of a new invention, an improved 
science. And in the complications of the trade and politics of their 
vast empire, they have been equal to every exigency, with counsel 
and with conduct. Is it their luck, or is it in the chambers of their 
brain, — ^it is their commercial advantage, that whatever light appears 
in better method or happy invention, breaks out in their race. They 
are a family to which a destiny attaches, and the Banshee has sworn 
that a male heir shall never be wanting. They have a wealth of men 
to fill important posts, and the vigilance of party criticism insures the 
selection of a competent person. 

A proof of the energy of the British people, is the highly artificial 
construction of the whole fabric. The cHmate and geography, I 
said, were factitious, as if the hands of man had arranged the 
conditions. The same character pervades the whole kingdom. Bacon 
said, "Rome was a state not subject to paradoxes;" but England sub- 
sists by antagonisms and contradictions. The foundations of its 
greatness are the rolling waves; and, from first to last, it is a museum 
of anomalies. This foggy and rainy country furnishes the world with 
astronomical observations. Its short rivers do not afford water-power, 
but the land shakes under the thunder of the mills. There is no 
gold mine of any importance, but there is more gold in England 
than in all other countries. It is too far north for the culture of 
the vine, but the wines of all countries are in its docks. The French 
Comte de Lauraguais said, "No fruit ripens in England but a baked 
apple;" but oranges and pine-apples are as cheap in London as in 
the Mediterranean. The Mark-Lane Express or the Custom House 
Returns bear out to the letter the vaunt of Pope, 

"Let India boast her palms, nor envy we 
The weeping amber nor the spicy tree, 
While, by our oaks those precious loads are borne, 
And realms commanded which those trees adorn." 

The native cattle are extinct, but the island is full of artificial breeds. 
The agriculturist Bakewell created sheep and cows and horses to 



ABILITY 363 

order, and breeds in which everything was omitted but what is 
economical. The cow is sacrificed to her bag, the ox to his sirloin. 
Stall-feeding makes sperm-mills of the cattle, and converts the stable 
to a chemical factory. The rivers, lakes, and ponds, too much fished, 
or obstructed by factories, are artificially filled with the eggs of 
salmon, turbot, and herring. 

Chat Moss and the fens of Lincolnshire and Cambridgeshire are 
unhealthy and too barren to pay rent. By cylindrical tiles, and gutta- 
percha tubes, five miUions of acres of bad land have been drained 
and put on equality with the best, for rape-culture and grass. The 
climate too, which was already believed to have become milder and 
drier by the enormous consumption of coal, is so far reached by this 
new action, that fogs and storms are said to disappear. In due course, 
all England will be drained, and rise a second time out of the waters. 
The latest step was to call in the aid of steam to agriculture. Steam 
is almost an Englishman. I do not know but they will send him 
to Parliament next, to make laws. He weaves, forges, saws, pounds, 
fans, and now he must pump, grind, dig, and plough for the farmer. 
The markets created by the manufacturing population have erected 
agriculture into a great thriving and spending industry. The value 
of the houses in Britain is equal to the value of the soil. Artificial 
aids of all kinds are cheaper than the natural resources. No man 
can afford to walk, when the parliamentary-train carries him for a 
penny a mile. Gas-burners are cheaper than daylight in numberless 
floors in the cities. All the houses in London buy their water. The 
English trade does not exist for the exportation of native products, 
but on its manufactures, or the making well everything which is ill 
made elsewhere. They make ponchos for the Mexican, bandannas 
for the Hindoo, ginseng for the Chinese, beads for the Indian, laces 
for the Flemings, telescopes for astronomers, cannons for kings. 

The Board of Trade caused the best models of Greece and Italy 
to be placed within the reach of every manufacturing populadon. 
They caused to be translated from foreign languages and illustrated 
by elaborate drawings, the most approved works of Munich, Berlin, 
and Paris. They have ransacked Italy to find new forms, to add a 
grace to the products of their looms, their potteries, and their found- 
ries. 3 See Memorial of H. Greenough, p. G6. New York, 1853. 



364 ENGLISH TRAITS 

The nearer we look, the more artificial is their social system. 
Their law is a network of fictions. Their property, a scrip or cer- 
tificate of right to interest on money that no man ever saw. Their 
social classes are made by statute. Their ratios of power and represen- 
tation are historical and legal. The last Reform bill took away 
political power from a mound, a ruin, and a stone-wall, whilst Bir- 
mingham and Manchester, whose mills paid for the wars of Europe, 
had no representative. Purity in the elective Parliament is secured 
by the purchase of seats.* Foreign power is kept by armed colonies; 
power at home, by a standing army of police. The pauper lives better 
than the free laborer; the thief better than the pauper; and the 
transported felon better than the one under imprisonment. The 
crimes are factitious, as smuggling, poaching, non-conformity, her- 
esy, and treason. Better, they say in England, kill a man than a hare. 
The sovereignty of the seas is maintained by the impressment of 
seamen. "The impressment of seamen," said Lord Eldon, "is the 
life of our navy." Solvency is maintained by means of the national 
debt, on the principle, "If you will not lend me the money, how can 
I pay you?" For the administration of justice. Sir Samuel Romilly's 
expedient for clearing the arrears of business in Chancery, was, the 
Chancellor's staying away entirely from his court. Their system of 
education is factitious. The Universities galvanize dead languages 
into a semblance of life. Their church is artificial. The manners and 
customs of society are artificial; — made up men with made up man- 
ners; — and thus, the whole is Birminghamized, and we have a nation 
whose existence is a work of art; — a cold, barren, almost arctic isle, 
being made the most fruitful, luxurious, and imperial land in the 
whole earth. 

Man in England submits to be a product of political economy. 
On a bleak moor, a mill is built, a banking-house is opened, and men 
come in, as water in a sluice-way, and towns and cities rise. Man is 
made as a Birmingham button. The rapid doubling of the popula- 
tion dates from Watt's steam-engine. A landlord, who owns a prov- 
ince, says, "The tenantry are unprofitable; let me have sheep." He 
unroofs the houses, and ships the population to America. The nation 

■•sir S. Romilly, purest of English patriots, decided that the only independent mode 
of entering Parliament was to buy a seat, and he bought Horsham. 



ABILITY 365 

is accustomed to the instantaneous creation of wealth. It is the 
maxim of their economists, "that the greater part in value of the 
wealth now existing in England has been produced by human hands 
within the last twelve months." Meantime three or four days' rain 
will reduce hundreds to starving in London. 

One secret of their power is their mutual good understanding. 
Not only good minds are born among them, but, all the people have 
good minds. Every nation has yielded some good wit, if, as has 
chanced to many tribes, only one. But the intellectual organization 
of the English admits a communicableness of knowledge and ideas 
among them all. An electric touch by any of their national ideas, 
melts them into one family, and brings the hoards of power which 
their individuality is always hiving, into use and play for all. Is it 
the smallness of the country, or is it the pride and affection of 
race, — they have solidarity, or responsibleness, and trust in each 
other. 

Their minds, Uke wool, admit of a dye which is more lasting than 
the cloth. They embrace their cause with more tenacity than their 
life. Though not military, yet every common subject by the poll is 
fit to make a soldier of. These private reserved mute family-men 
can adopt a public end with all their heat, and this strength of 
affection makes the romance of their heroes. The difference of rank 
does not divide the national heart. The Danish poet Ohlenschlager 
complains that who writes in Danish writes to two hundred readers. 
In Germany, there is one speech for the learned, and another for the 
masses, to that extent that, it is said, no sentiment or phrase from 
the works of any great German writer is ever heard among the lower 
classes. But in England, the language of the noble is the language of 
the poor. In Parliament, in pulpits, in theatres, when the speakers 
rise to thought and passion, the language becomes idiomatic; the 
people in the street best understand the best words. And their 
language seems drawn from the Bible, the common law, and the 
works of Shakspeare, Bacon, Milton, Pope, Young, Cowper, Burns, 
and Scott. The island has produced two or three of the greatest 
men that ever existed, but they were not solitary in their own time. 
Men quickly embodied what Newton found out, in Greenwich ob- 
servatories, and practical navigation. The boys know all that Hutton 



366 ENGLISH TRAITS 

knew o£ strata, or Dalton of atoms, or Harvey of blood-vessels; and 
these studies, once dangerous, are in fashion. So what is invented 
or known in agriculture, or in trade, or in war, or in art, or in litera- 
ture, and antiquities. A great ability, not amassed on a few giants, 
but poured into the general mind, so that each of them could at a 
pinch stand in the shoes of the other; and they are more bound in 
character, than differenced in ability or in rank. The laborer is a 
possible lord. The lord is a possible basket-maker. Every man 
carries the English system in his brain, knows what is confided to 
him, and does therein the best he can. The chancellor carries Eng- 
land on his mace, the midshipman at the point of his dirk, the smith 
on his hammer, the cook in the bowl of his spoon; the postilion 
cracks his whip for England, and the sailor times his oars to "God 
save the King!" The very felons have their pride in each other's 
English stanchness. In politics and in war, they hold together as by 
hooks of steel. The charm in Nelson's history is the unselfish great- 
ness; the assurance of being supported to the uttermost by those 
whom he supports to the uttermost. Whilst they are some ages 
ahead of the rest of the world in the art of living; whilst in some 
directions they do not represent the modern spirit, but constitute it, 
— this vanguard of civility and power they coldly hold, marching in 
phalanx, lock-step, foot after foot, file after file of heroes, ten thou- 
sand deep. 

CHAPTER VI 



I FIND the Enghshman to be him of all men who stands firmest 
in his shoes. They have in themselves what they value in their horses, 
mettle and bottom. On the day of my arrival at Liverpool, a gentle- 
man, in describing to me the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland, happened 
to say, "Lord Clarendon has pluck like a cock, and will fight till 
he dies;" and what I heard first I heard last, and the one thing the 
English value is pluck. The cabmen have it; the merchants have 
it; the bishops have it; the women have it; the journals have it; the 
Times newspaper, they say, is the pluckiest thing in England, and 
Sydney Smith had made it a proverb that little Lord John Russell, 



MANNERS 367 

the minister, would take the command of the Channel fleet to- 
morrow. 

They require you to dare to be of your own opinion, and they 
hate the practical cowards who cannot in affairs answer directly 
yes or no. They dare to displease, nay, they will let you break all 
the commandments, if you do it natively, and with spirit. You must 
be somebody; then you may do this or that, as you will. 

Machinery has been appUed to all work, and carried to such per- 
fection, that little is left for the men but to mind the engines and 
feed the furnaces. But the machines require punctual service, and, 
as they never tire, they prove too much for their tenders. Mines, 
forges, mills, breweries, railroads, steam-pump, steam-plough, drill 
of regiments, drill of police, rule of court, and shop-rule have 
operated to give a mechanical regularity to all the habit and action 
of men. A terrible machine has possessed itself of the ground, the 
air, the men and women, and hardly even thought is free. 

The mechanical might and organization requires in the people 
constitution and answering spirits: and he who goes among them 
must have some weight of metal. At last, you take your hint from 
the fury of life you find, and say, one thing is plain, this is no country 
for fainthearted people: don't creep about diffidently; make up your 
mind; take your own course, and you shall find respect and fur- 
therance. 

It requires, men say, a good constitution to travel in Spain. I say 
as much of England, for other cause, simply on account of the vigor 
and brawn of the people. Nothing but the most serious business 
could give one any counterweight to these Baresarks, though they 
were only to order eggs and muffins for their breakfast. The Eng- 
lishman speaks with all his body. His elocution is stomachic, — as 
the American's is labial. The Englishman is very petulant and pre- 
cise about his accommodation at inns, and on the roads; a quiddle 
about his toast and his chop, and every species of convenience, and 
loud and pungent in his expressions of impatience at any neglect. 
His vivacity betrays itself, at all points, in his manners, in his respira- 
tion, and the inarticulate noises he makes in clearing the throat; — 
all significant of burly strength. He has stamina; he can take the 
initiative in emergencies. He has that aplomb, which results from a 



368 ENGLISH TRAITS 

good adjustment of the moral and physical nature, and the obedience 
of all the powers to the will; as if the axes of his eyes were united to 
his backbone, and only moved with the trunk. 

This vigor appears in the incuriosity, and stony neglect, each of 
every other. Each man walks, eats, drinks, shaves, dresses, gesticu- 
lates, and, in every manner, acts and suffers without reference to 
the bystanders, in his own fashion, only careful not to interfere 
with them, or annoy them; not that he is trained to neglect the eyes 
of his neighbors, — he is really occupied with his own affair, and 
does not think of them. Every man in this poHshed country consults 
only his convenience, as much as a solitary pioneer in Wisconsin. I 
know not where any personal eccentricity is so freely allowed, and 
no man gives himself any concern with it. An Englishman walks 
in a pouring rain, swinging his closed umbrella like a walking-stick; 
wears a wig, or a shawl, or a saddle, or stands on his head, and no 
remark is made. And as he has been doing this for several genera- 
tions, it is now in the blood. 

In short, every one of these islanders is an island himself, safe, 
tranquil, incommunicable. In a company of strangers, you would 
think him deaf; his eyes never wander from his table and news- 
paper. He is never betrayed into any curiosity or unbecoming 
emotion. They have all been trained in one severe school of man- 
ners, and never put off the harness. He does not give his hand. 
He does not let you meet his eye. It is almost an affront to look a 
man in the face, without being introduced. In mixed or in select 
companies they do not introduce persons; so that a presentation is 
a circumstance as valid as a contract. Introductions are sacraments. 
He withholds his name. At the hotel, he is hardly willing to whisper 
it to the clerk at the book-office. If he give you his private address 
on a card, it is like an avowal of friendship; and his bearing, on 
being introduced, is cold, even though he is seeking your acquaint- 
ance, and is studying how he shall serve you. 

It was an odd proof of this impressive energy that, in my lectures, 
I hesitated to read and threw out for its impertinence many a dis- 
paraging phrase, which I had been accustomed to spin, about poor, 
thin, unable mortals; — so much had the fine physique and the per- 
sonal vigor of this robust race worked on my imagination. 



MANNERS 369 

I happened to arrive in England at the moment of a commercial 
crisis. But it was evident that, let who will fail, England will not. 
These people have sat here a thousand years, and here will continue 
to sit. They will not break up, or arrive at any desperate revolution, 
like their neighbors; for they have as much energy, as much conti- 
nence of character as they ever had. The power and possession 
which surround them are their own creation, and they exert the 
same commanding industry at this moment. 

They are positive, methodical, cleanly, and formal, loving routine, 
and conventional ways; loving truth and religion, to be sure, but 
inexorable on points of form. All the world praises the comfort and 
private appointments of an English inn, and of English households. 
You are sure of neatness and of personal decorum. A Frenchman 
may possibly be clean; an Englishman is conscientiously clean. A 
certain order and complete propriety is found in his dress and in his 
belongings. 

Born in a harsh and wet climate, which keeps him in doors when- 
ever he is at rest, and being of an affectionate and loyal temper, he 
dearly loves his house. If he is rich, he buys a demesne and builds 
a hall; if he is in middle condition, he spares no expense on his 
house. Without, it is all planted: within, it is wainscoted, carved, 
curtained, hung with pictures, and filled with good furniture. 'Tis 
a passion which survives all others, to deck and improve it. Hither 
he brings all that is rare and costly, and with the national tendency 
to sit fast in the same spot for many generations, it comes to be, in 
the course of time, a museum of heirlooms, gifts, and trophies of the 
adventures and exploits of the family. He is very fond of silver 
plate, and, though he have no gallery of portraits of his ancestors, 
he has of their punch-bowls and porringers. Incredible amounts of 
plate are found in good houses, and the poorest have some spoon or 
saucepan, gift of a godmother, saved out of better times. 

An English family consists of a few persons, who, from youth to 
age, are found revolving within a few feet of each other, as if tied 
by some invisible ligature, tense as that cartilage which we have 
seen attaching the two Siamese. England produces under favorable 
conditions of ease and culture the finest women in the world. And, 
as the men are affectionate and true-hearted, the women inspire and 



370 ENGLISH TRAITS 

refine them. Nothing can be more deUcate without being fantastical, 
nothing more firm and based in nature and sentiment, than the 
courtship and mutual carriage of the sexes. The song of 1596 says, 
"The wife of every Englishman is counted blest." The sentiment 
of Imogen in Cymbeline is copied from English nature; and not 
less the Portia of Brutus, the Kate Percy, and the Desdemona. The 
romance does not exceed the height of noble passion in Mrs. Lucy 
Hutchinson, or in Lady Russell, or even as one discerns through the 
plain prose of Pepys's Diary, the sacred habit of an English wife. 
Sir Samuel Romilly could not bear the death of his wife. Every 
class has its noble and tender examples. 

Domesticity is the taproot which enables the nation to branch 
wide and high. The motive and end of their trade and empire is to 
guard the independence and privacy of their homes. Nothing so 
much marks their manners as the concentration on their household 
ties. This domesticity is carried into court and camp. Wellington 
governed India and Spain and his own troops, and fought batdes 
like a good family-man, paid his debts, and, though general of an 
army in Spain, could not stir abroad for fear of public creditors. This 
taste for house and parish merits has of course its doting and foolish 
side. Mr. Cobbett attributes the huge popularity of Perceval, prime 
minister in 1810, to the fact that he was wont to go to church, every 
Sunday, with a large quarto gilt prayer-book under one arm, his 
wife hanging on the other, and followed by a long brood of children. 

They keep their old customs, costumes, and pomps, their wig and 
mace, sceptre and crown. The Middle Ages still lurk in the streets 
of London. The Knights of the Bath take oath to defend injured 
ladies; the gold-sdck-in-waiting survives. They repeated the cere- 
monies of the eleventh century in the coronation of the present 
Queen. A hereditary tenure is natural to them. Offices, farms, trades, 
and tradidons descend so. Their leases run for a hundred and a 
thousand years. Terms of service and partnership are lifelong, or 
are inherited. "Holdship has been with me," said Lord Eldon, 
"eight-and-twenty years, knows all my business and books." Antiq- 
uity of usage is sanction enough. Wordsworth says of the small 
freeholders of Westmoreland, "Many of these humble sons of the 
hills had a consciousness that the land which they tilled had for 



MANNERS 371 

more than five hundred years been possessed by men o£ the same 
name and blood." The ship-carpenter in the public yards, my lord's 
gardener and porter, have been there for more than a hundred years, 
grandfather, father, and son. 

The English power resides also in their dislike of change. They 
have difficulty in bringing their reason to act, and on all occasions 
use their memory first. As soon as they have rid themselves of some 
grievance, and settled the better practice, they make haste to fix it as 
a finality, and never wish to hear of alteration more. 

Every Englishman is an embryonic chancellor: his instinct is to 
search for a precedent. The favorite phrase of their law is, "a custom 
whereof the memory of man runneth not back to the contrary." The 
barons say, "Nolumus mutari;" and the cockneys stifle the curiosity 
of the foreigner on the reason of any practice, with "Lord, sir, it was 
always so." They hate innovation. Bacon told them. Time was the 
right reformer; Chatham, that "confidence was a plant of slow 
growth;" Canning, to "advance with the times;" and Wellington, 
that "habit was ten times nature." All their statesmen learn the 
irresistibility of the tide of custom and have invented many fine 
phrases to cover this slowness of perception, and prehensiHty of tail. 

A seashell should be the crest of England, not only because it 
represents a power built on the waves, but also the hard finish of the 
men. The Englishman is finished like a cowry or a murex. After 
the spire and the spines are formed, or, with the formation, a juice 
exudes, and a hard enamel varnishes every part. The keeping of 
the proprieties is as indispensable as clean linen. No merit quite 
countervails the want of this, whilst this sometimes stands in lieu of 
all. " 'Tis in bad taste" is the most formidable word an Englishman 
can pronounce. But this japan costs them dear. There is a prose in 
certain Englishmen, which exceeds in wooden deadness all rivalry 
with other countrymen. There is a knell in the conceit and exter- 
nality of their voice, which seems to say. Leave all hope behind. In 
this Gibraltar of propriety mediocrity gets intrenched, and consol- 
idated, and founded in adamant. An Englishman of fashion is like 
one of those souvenirs, bound in gold vellum, enriched with deUcate 
engravings, on thick hot-pressed paper, fit for the hands of ladies and 
princes, but with nothing in it worth reading or remembering. 



372 ENGLISH TRAITS 

A severe decorum rules the court and the cottage. When Thal- 
berg, the pianist, was one evening performing before the Queen, at 
Windsor, in a private party, the Queen accompanied him with her 
voice. The circumstance took air, and all England shuddered from 
sea to sea. The indecorum was never repeated. Cold, repressive 
manners prevail. No enthusiasm is permitted, except at the opera. 
They avoid everything marked. They require a tone of voice that 
excites no attention in the room. Sir Philip Sidney is one of the 
patron saints of England, of whom Wotton said, "His wit was the 
measure of congruity." 

Pretension and vaporing are once for all distasteful. They keep to 
the other extreme of low tone in dress and manners. They avoid 
pretension, and go right to the heart of the thing. They hate non- 
sense, sentimentalism, and high-flown expression; they use a studied 
plainness. Even Brummel, their fop, was marked by the severest 
simplicity in dress. They value themselves on the absence of every- 
thing theatrical in the public business, and on conciseness and going 
to the point, in private affairs. 

In an aristocratical country like England, not the Trial by Jury, 
but the dinner, is the capital institution. It is the mode of doing 
honor to a stranger, to invite him to eat, — and has been for many 
hundred years. "And they think," says the Venetian traveller of 
1500, "no greater honor can be conferred or received than to invite 
others to eat with them, or to be invited themselves, and they would 
sooner give five or six ducats to provide an entertainment for a 
person, than a groat to assist him in any distress."^ It is reserved to 
the end of the day, the family-hour being generally six, in London, 
and, if any company is expected, one or two hours later. Every one 
dresses for dinner, in his own house, or in another man's. The guests 
are expected to arrive within half an hour of the time fixed by card 
of invitation, and nothing but death or mutilation is permitted to 
detain them. The English dinner is precisely the model on which 
our own are constructed in the Atlantic cities. The company sit one 
or two hours before the ladies leave the table. The gentlemen remain 
over their wine an hour longer, and rejoin the ladies in the drawing- 
room, and take coffee. The dress-dinner generates a talent of 

I "Relation of England." Printed by the Camden Society. 



TRUTH 373 

table-talk which reaches great perfection: the stories are so good, 
that one is sure they must have been often told before, to have got 
such happy turns. Hither come all manner of clever projects, bits 
of popular science, of practical invention, of miscellaneous humor; 
pohtical, literary, and personal news; railroads, horses, diamonds, 
agriculture, horticulture, pisciculture, and wine. 

English stories, bon-mots, and the recorded table-talk of their wits, 
are as good as the best of the French. In America we are apt scholars, 
but have not yet attained the same perfection: for the range of 
nations from which London draws, and the steep contrasts of con- 
dition, create the picturesque in society, as broken country makes 
picturesque landscape, whilst our prevailing equality makes a prairie 
lameness ; and secondly, because the usage of a dress-dinner every 
day at dark has a tendency to hive and produce to advantage every- 
thing good. Much attrition has worn every sentence into a bullet. 
Also one meets now and then with polished men who know every- 
thing, have tried everything, can do everything, and are quite 
superior to letters and science. What could they not, if only they 
would.? 

CHAPTER VII 



The Teutonic tribes have a national singleness of heart, which 
contrasts with the Latin races. The German name has a proverbial 
significance of sincerity and honest meaning. The arts bear testi- 
mony to it. The faces of clergy and laity in old sculptures and illu- 
minated missals are charged with earnest belief. Add to this heredi- 
tary rectitude, the punctuality and precise dealing which commerce 
creates, and you have the English truth and credit. The government 
stricdy performs its engagements. The subjects do not understand 
trifling on its part. When any breach of promise occurred, in the 
old days of prerogative, it was resented by the people as an intolerable 
grievance. And, in modern times, any slipperiness in the government 
in political faith, or any repudiation or crookedness in matters of 
finance, would bring the whole nation to a committee of inquiry 
and reform. Private men keep their promises, never so trivial. Down 



374 ENGLISH TRAITS 

goes the flying word on the tablets, and is indeUble as Domesday 
Book. 

Their practical power rests on their national sincerity. Veracity 
derives from instinct, and marks superiority in organization. Nature 
has endowed some animals with cunning, as a compensation for 
strength withheld; but it has provoked the malice of all others, as if 
avengers of pubhc wrong. In the nobler kinds, where strength could 
be afforded, her races are loyal to truth, as truth is the foundation of 
the social state. Beasts that make no truce with man, do not break 
faith with each other. 'Tis said that the wolf, who makes a cache 
of his prey, and brings his fellows with him to the spot, if, on 
digging, it is not found, is instantly and unresistingly torn in pieces. 
English veracity seems to result on a sounder animal structure, as if 
they could afford it. They are blunt in saying what they think, 
sparing of promises, and they require plain-dealing of others. We 
will not have to do with a man in a mask. Let us know the truth. 
Draw a straight line, hit whom and where it will. Alfred, whom the 
affection of the nation makes the type of their race, is called by his 
friend Asser, the truth-speaker; Alueredus veridicus. Geoffrey of 
Monmouth says of King Aurelius, uncle of Arthur, that "above all 
things he hated a lie." The Northman Guttorm said to King Olaf, 
"It is royal work to fulfil royal words." The mottoes of their families 
are monitory proverbs, as, Fare fac, — Say, do, — of the Fairfaxes; Say 
and seal, of the house of Fiennes; Vero nil verius, of the De Veres. 
To be king of their word, is their pride. When they unmask cant, 
they say, "The English of this is)' &c.; and to give the lie is the 
extreme insult. The phrase of the lowest of the people is "honor- 
bright," and their vulgar praise, "His word is as good as his bond." 
They hate shuffling and equivocation, and the cause is damaged in 
the public opinion, on which any paltering can be fixed. Even Lord 
Chesterfield, with his French breeding, when he came to define a 
gendeman, declared that truth made his distincdon: and nothing 
ever spoken by him would find so hearty a suffrage from his nation. 
The Duke of Wellington, who had the best right to say so, advises 
the French General Kellermann, that he may rely on the parole of 
an EngUsh officer. The English, of all classes, value themselves 
on this trait, as distinguishing them from the French, who, in the 



TRUTH 375 

popular belief, are more polite than true. An Englishman under- 
states, avoids the superlative, checks himself in compliments, alleging 
that in the French language one cannot speak without lying. 

They love reality in wealth, power, hospitality, and do not easily 
learn to make a show, and take the world as it goes. They are not 
fond of ornaments, and if they wear them, they must be gems. They 
read gladly in old Fuller, that a lady, in the reign of Elizabeth, 
"would have as patiendy digested a lie, as the wearing of false 
stones or pendants of counterfeit pearl." They have the earth- 
hunger, or preference for property in land, which is said to mark the 
Teutonic nations. They build of stone: public and private buildings 
are massive and durable. In comparing their ships' houses and public 
offices with the American, it is commonly said that they spend a 
pound where we spend a dollar. Plain rich clothes, plain rich equip- 
age, plain rich finish throughout their house and belongings, mark 
the English truth. 

They confide in each other, — English believes in English. The 
French feel the superiority of this probity. The Englishman is not 
springing a trap for his admiration, but is honestly minding his 
business. The Frenchman is vain. Madame de Stael says that the 
English irritated Napoleon, mainly, because they have found out how 
to unite success with honesty. She was not aware how wide an appli- 
cation her foreign readers would give to the remark. Wellington dis- 
covered the ruin of Bonaparte's affairs, by his own probity. He 
augured ill of the empire, as soon as he saw that it was mendacious, 
and lived by war. If war do not bring in its sequel new trade, 
better agriculture and manufactures, but only games, fireworks and 
spectacles, — no prosperity could support it; much less, a nation 
decimated for conscripts, and out of pocket, like France. So he 
drudged for years on his military works at Lisbon, and from this 
base at last extended his gigantic lines to Waterloo, believing in his 
countrymen and their syllogisms above all the rhodomontade of 
Europe. 

At a St. George's festival, in Montreal, where I happened to be a 
guest, since my return home, I observed that the chairman compli- 
mented his compatriots, by saying, "they confided that wherever 
they met an Englishman, they found a man who would speak the 



37^ ENGLISH TRAITS 

truth." And one cannot think this festival fruitless, if, all over the 
world, on the 23d of April, wherever two or three English are 
found, they meet to encourage each other in the nationality of 
veracity. 

In the power of saying rude truth, sometimes in the lion's mouth, 
no men surpass them. On the king's birthday, when each bishop was 
expected to offer the king a purse of gold, Latimer gave Henry VIII. 
a copy of the Vulgate, with a mark at the passage, "Whoremongers 
and adulterers God will judge;" and they so honor stoutness in each 
other, that the king passed it over. They are tenacious of their belief, 
and cannot easily change their opinions to suit the hour. They are 
like ships with too much head on to come quickly about, nor 
will prosperity or even adversity be allowed to shake their 
habitual view of conduct. Whilst I was in London, M. Guizot 
arrived there on his escape from Paris, in February 1848. Many 
private friends called on him. His name was immediately proposed 
as an honorary member of the Athenaeum. M. Guizot was black- 
balled. Certainly, they knew the distinction of his name. But the 
Englishman is not fickle. He had really made up his mind, now for 
years as he read his newspaper, to hate and despise M. Guizot; and 
the altered position of the man as an illustrious exile, and a guest in 
the country, make no difference to him, as they would instantly, to 
an American. 

They require the same adherence, thorough conviction and reality 
in public men. It is the want of character which makes the low 
reputation of the Irish members. "See them," they said, "one 
hundred and twenty-seven all voting like sheep, never proposing 
anything, and all but four voting the income tax," — which was an 
ill-judged concession of the Government, relieving Irish property 
from the burdens charged on English. 

They have a horror of adventurers in or out of Parliament. The 
ruling passion of Englishmen, in these days, is a terror of humbug. 
In the same proportion, they value honesty, stoutness, and adherence 
to your own. They like a man committed to his objects. They hate 
the French, as frivolous; they hate the Irish, as aimless; they hate 
the Germans, as professors. In February, 1848, they said, Look, the 
French king and his party fell for want of a shot; they had not 



TRUTH l^'J 

conscience to shoot, so entirely was the pith and heart of monarchy 
eaten out." 

They attack their own politicians every day, on the same grounds, 
as adventurers. They love stoutness in standing for your right, in 
declining money or promotion that costs any concession. The bar- 
rister refuses the silk gown of Queen's Counsel, if his junior have it 
one day earlier. Lord CoUingwood would not accept his medal for 
victory on 14th February, 1797, if he did not receive one for victory 
on ist June, 1794; and the long withholden medal was accorded. 
When Castlereagh dissuaded Lord Wellington from going to the 
king's levee, until the unpopular Cintra business had been explained, 
he replied, "You furnish me a reason for going. I will go to this, or 
I will never go to a king's levee." The radical mob at Oxford cried 
after the tory Lord Eldon, "There's old Eldon; cheer him; he never 
ratted." They have given the parliamentary nickname of Trimmers 
to the timeservers, whom English character does not love.'- 

They are very liable in their politics to extraordinary delusions, 
thus, to believe what stands recorded in the gravest books, that the 
movement of 10 April, 1848, was urged or assisted by foreigners: 
which, to be sure, is paralleled by the democratic whimsy in this 
country, which I have noticed to be shared by men sane on other 
points, that the English are at the bottom of the agitation of slavery 
in American politics: and then again to the French popular legends 
on the subject of perfidious Albion. But suspicion will make fools of 
nations as of citizens. 

A slow temperament makes them less rapid and ready than other 
countrymen, and has given occasion to the observation, that English 
wit comes afterwards, — which the French denote as esprit d'escalier. 
This dulness makes their attachment to home, and their adherence 
in all foreign countries to home habits. The Englishman who visits 
Mount Etna, will carry his teakettle to the top. The old Italian 
author of the "Relation of England" (in 1500) says, "I have it on the 

'It is an unlucky moment to remember these sparkles of solitary virtue in the 
face of the honors lately paid in England to the Emperor Louis Napoleon. I am 
sure that no Englishman whom I had the happiness to know consented, when the 
aristocracy and the commons of London cringed like a Neapolitan rabble, before 
a successful thief. But — how to resist one step, though odious, in a linked series of 
state necessities? — Governments must always learn too late, that the use of dishonest 
agents is as ruinous for nations as for single men. 



378 ENGLISH TRAITS 

best information, that, when the war is actually raging most furi- 
ously, they will seek for good eating, and all their other comforts, 
without thinking what harm might befall them." Then their eyes 
seem to be set at the bottom of a tunnel, and they affirm the one small 
fact they know, with the best faith in the world that nothing else 
exists. And, as their own belief in guineas is perfect, they readily, on 
all occasions, apply the pecuniary argument as final. Thus when the 
Rochester rappings began to be heard of in England, a man deposited 
;^ioo in a sealed box in the Dublin Bank, and then advertised in the 
newspapers to all somnambulists, mesmerizers, and others, that 
whoever could tell him the number of his note, should have the 
money. He let it lie there six months, the newspapers now and 
then, at his instance, stimulating the attention of the adepts; but none 
could ever tell him; and he said, "Now let me never be bothered 
more with this proven lie." It is told of a good Sir John, that he 
heard a case stated by counsel, and made up his mind; then the 
counsel for the other side taking their turn to speak, he found 
himself so unsettled and perplexed, that he exclaimed, "So help me 
God! I will never listen to evidence again." Any number of delight- 
ful examples of this EngHsh stolidity are the anecdotes of Europe. I 
knew a very worthy man, — a magistrate, I believe he was, in the 
town of Derby, — who went to the opera, to see Malibran. In one 
scene, the heroine was to rush across a ruined bridge. Mr. B. arose, 
and mildly yet firmly called the attention of the audience and the 
performers to the fact that, in his judgment, the bridge was unsafe! 
This English stolidity contrasts with French wit and tact. The 
French, it is commonly said, have greatly more influence in Europe 
than the English. What influence the English have is by brute force 
of wealth and power; that of the French by affinity and talent. The 
Italian is subtle, the Spaniard treacherous: tortures, it was said, could 
never wrest from an Egyptian the confession of a secret. None of 
these traits belong to the EngUshman. His choler and conceit force 
everything out. Defoe, who knew his countrymen well, says of them, 

"In close intrigue, their faculty's but weak. 
For generally whate'er they know, they speak. 
And often their own counsels undermine 
By mere infirmity without design; 



CHARACTER 379 

From whence, the learned say, it doth proceed, 
That English treasons never can succeed; 
For they're so open-hearted, you may know 
Their own most secret thoughts, and others' too." 

CHAPTER VIII 

CHARACTER 

The English race are reputed morose. I do not know that they 
have sadder brows than their neighbors of northern climates. They 
are sad by comparison with the singing and dancing nations: not 
sadder, but slow and staid, as finding their joys at home. They, too, 
believe that where there is no enjoyment of life, there can be no 
vigor and art in speech or thought: that your merry heart goes all the 
way, your sad one tires in a mile. This trait of gloom has been fixed 
on them by French travellers, who from Froissart, Voltaire, Le Sage, 
Mirabeau, down to the lively journalists of the jeuilletons, have spent 
their wit on the solemnity of their neighbors. The French say, gay 
conversation is unknown in their island. The Englishman finds no 
relief from reflection, except in reflection. When he wishes for 
amusement, he goes to work. His hilarity is like an attack of fever. 
Religion, the theatre, and the reading the books of his country, all 
feed and increase his natural melancholy. The police does not inter- 
fere with public diversions. It thinks itself bound in duty to respect 
the pleasures and rare gayety of this inconsolable nation; and their 
well-known courage is entirely attributable to their disgust of life. 

I suppose their gravity of demeanor and their few words have 
obtained this reputation. As compared with the Americans, I think 
them cheerful and contented. Young people in this country are much 
more prone to melancholy. The English have a mild aspect, and a 
ringing, cheerful voice. They are large natured, and not so easily 
amused as the southerners, and are among them as grown people 
among children, requiring war, or trade, or engineering, or science, 
instead of frivolous games. They are proud and private, and, even if 
disposed to recreation, will avoid an open garden. They sported 
sadly; Us s'amusaient tristement, selon la coututne de leur pays, said 
Froissart; and I suppose never nation built their party-walls so thick, 



380 ENGLISH TRAITS 

or their garden-fences so high. Meat and wine produce no eflFect on 
them: they are just as cold, quiet and composed at the end, as at the 
beginning of dinner. 

The reputation of taciturnity they have enjoyed for six or seven 
hundred years; and a kind of pride in bad pubHc spealiing is noted in 
the House of Commons, as if they were willing to show that they 
did not live by their tongues, or thought they spoke well enough if 
they had the tone of gentlemen. In mixed company they shut their 
mouths. A Yorkshire mill-owner told me he had ridden more than 
once all the way from London to Leeds, in the first-class carriage, 
with the same persons, and no word exchanged. The club-houses 
were established to cultivate social habits, and it is rare that more 
than two eat together, and oftenest one eats alone. Was it, then, a 
stroke of humor in the serious Swedenborg, or was it only his pitiless 
logic, that made him shut up the EngHsh souls in a heaven by them- 
selves ? 

They are contradictorily described as sour, splenetic, and stubborn, 
— and as mild, sweet, and sensible. The truth is, they have great 
range and variety of character. Commerce sends abroad multitudes 
of different classes. The choleric Welshman, the fervid Scot, the 
bilious resident in the East or West Indies, are wide of the perfect 
behavior of the educated and dignified man of family. So is the burly 
farmer; so is the country 'squire, with his narrow and violent life. 
In every inn is the Commercial-Room, in which "travellers," or bag- 
men who carry patterns, and solicit orders for the manufacturers, 
are wont to be entertained. It easily happens that this class should 
characterize England to the foreigner, who meets them on the road 
and at every public house, whilst the gentry avoid the taverns, or 
seclude themselves whilst in them. 

But these classes are the right English stock, and may fairly show 
the national qualities before yet art and education have dealt with 
them. They are good lovers, good haters, slow but obstinate 
admirers, and in all things very much steeped in their temperament, 
hke men hardly awaked from deep sleep which they enjoy. Their 
habits and instincts cleave to nature. They are of the earth, earthy; 
and of the sea, as the sea-kinds, attached to it for what it yields them, 
and not from any sentiment. They are full of coarse strength, rude 



CHARACTER 38 1 

exercise, butcher's meat, and sound sleep; and suspect any poetic 
insinuation, or any hint for the conduct o£ Ufe which reflects on this 
animal existence, as if somebody were fumbling at the umbilical 
cord, and might stop their supplies. They doubt a man's sound judg- 
ment if he does not eat with appetite, and shake their heads if he is 
particularly chaste. Take them as they come, you shall find in the 
common people a surly indifference, sometimes gruffness and ill 
temper; and, in minds of more power, magazines of inexhaustible 
war, challenging 

"The ruggedest hour that time and spite dare bring 
To frown upon the enraged Northumberland." 

They are headstrong believers and defenders of their opinion, and 
not less resolute in maintaining their whim and perversity. Heze- 
kiah Woodward wrote a book against the Lord's Prayer. And one 
can believe that Burton, the Anatomist of Melancholy, having pre- 
dicted from the stars the hour of his death, slipped the knot himself 
round his own neck, not to falsify his horoscope. 

Their looks bespeak an invincible stoutness: they have extreme 
difficulty to run away, and will die game. Wellington said of the 
young coxcombs of the Life-Guards, delicately brought up, "But the 
puppies fight well;" and Nelson said of his sailors, "They really mind 
shot no more than peas." Of absolute stoutness no nation has more 
or better examples. They are good at storming redoubts, at boarding 
frigates, at dying in the last ditch, or any desperate service which has 
daylight and honor in it; but not, I think, at enduring the rack, or 
any passive obedience, like jumping off a castle-roof at the word of a 
czar. Being both vascular and highly organized, so as to be very 
sensible of pain; and intellectual, so as to see reason and glory in a 
matter. 

Of that constitutional force, which yields the supplies of the day, 
they have the more than enough, the excess which creates courage 
on fortitude, genius in poetry, invention in mechanics, enterprise 
in trade, magnificence in wealth, splendor in ceremonies, petulance 
and projects in youth. The young men have a rude health which 
runs into peccant humors. They drink brandy like water, cannot 
expend their quantities of waste strength on riding, hunting, swim- 



382 ENGLISH TRAITS 

ming, and fencing, and run into absurd frolics with the gravity of 
the Eumenides. They stoutly carry into every nook and corner 
of the earth their turbulent sense; leaving no lie uncontradicted; no 
pretension unexamined. They chew hasheesh; cut themselves with 
poisoned creases; swing their hammock in the boughs of the Bohon 
Upas; taste every poison; buy every secret; at Naples, they put St. 
Januarius's blood in an alembic; they saw a hole into the head of the 
"winking Virgin," to know why she winks; measure with an English 
footrule every cell of the Inquisition, every Turkish caaba, every 
Holy of hoUes; translate and send to Bentley the arcanum bribed 
and buUied away from shuddering Bramins; and measure their own 
strength by the terror they cause. These travellers are of every class, 
the best and the worst; and it may easily happen that those of rudest 
behavior are taken notice of and remembered. The Saxon melan- 
choly in the vulgar rich and poor appears as gushes of ill-humor, 
which every check exasperates into sarcasm and vituperation. There 
are multitudes of rude young English who have the self-sufficiency 
and bluntness of their nation, and who, with their disdain of the 
rest of mankind, and with this indigestion and choler, have made the 
English traveller a proverb for uncomfortable and oifensive manners. 
It was no bad description of the Briton generically, what was said 
two hundred years ago, of one particular Oxford scholar: "He was 
a very bold man, uttered anything that came into his mind, not only 
among his companions, but in public coffee-houses, and would often 
speak his mind of particular persons then accidentally present, with- 
out examining the company he was in; for which he was often repri- 
manded, and several times threatened to be kicked and beaten." 

The common Englishman is prone to forget a cardinal article in 
the bill of social rights, that every man has a right to his own ears. 
No man can claim to usurp more than a few cubic feet of the audibil- 
ities of a pubhc room, or to put upon the company with the loud 
statement of his crotchets or personalities. 

But it is in the deep traits of race that the fortunes of nations are 
written, and however derived, whether a happier tribe or mixture of 
tribes, the air, or what circumstance, that mixed for them the golden 
mean of temperament, — here exists the best stock in the world, 
broad-fronted, broad-bottomed, best for depth, range, and equability, 



CHARACTER 383 

men of aplomb and reserves, great range and many moods, strong 
instincts, yet apt for culture; war-class as well as clerks; earls and 
tradesmen; wise minority, as well as foolish majority; abysmal 
temperament, hiding wells of wrath, and glooms on which no sun- 
shine settles; alternated with a common sense and humanity which 
hold them fast to every piece of cheerful duty; making this tempera- 
ment a sea to which all storms are superficial; a race to which their 
fortunes flow, as if they alone had the elastic organization at once 
fine and robust enough for dominion; as if the burly, inexpressive, 
now mute and contumacious, now fierce and sharp-tongued dragon, 
which once made the island light with his fiery breath, had be- 
queathed his ferocity to his conqueror. They hide virtues under 
vices, or the semblance of them. It is the misshapen hairy Scandina- 
vian troll again, who lifts the cart out of the mire, or "threshes the 
corn that ten day-laborers could not end," but it is done in the dark, 
and with muttered maledictions. He is a churl with a soft place in 
his heart, whose speech is a brash of bitter waters, but who loves to 
help you at a pinch. He says no, and serves you, and your thanks 
disgust him. Here was lately a cross-grained miser, odd and ugly, 
resembling in countenance the portrait of Punch, with the laugh left 
out; rich by his own industry; sulking in a lonely house; who never 
gave a dinner to any man, and disdained all courtesies; yet as true a 
worshipper of beauty in form and color as ever existed, and profusely 
pouring over the cold mind of his countrymen creations of grace and 
truth, removing the reproach of sterility from English art, catching 
from their savage climate every fine hint, and importing into their 
galleries every tint and trait of sunnier cities and skies; making an era 
in painting; and, when he saw that the splendor of one of his pictures 
in the Exhibition dimmed his rival's that hung next it, secretly took 
a brush and blackened his own. 

They do not wear their heart in their sleeve for daws to peck at. 
They have that phlegm or staidness, which it is a compliment to dis- 
turb. "Great men," said Aristotle, "are always of a nature originally 
melancholy." 'Tis the habit of a mind which attaches to abstrac- 
tions with a passion which gives vast results. They dare to displease, 
they do not speak to expectation. They like the sayers of No, better 
than the sayers of Yes. Each of them has an opinion which he feels 



384 ENGLISH TRAITS 

it becomes him to express all the more that it differs from yours. 
They are meditating opposition. This gravity is inseparable from 
minds of great resources. 

There is an English hero superior to the French, the German, the 
Italian, or the Greek. When he is brought to the strife with fate, he 
sacrifices a richer material possession, and on more purely meta- 
physical grounds. He is there with his own consent, face to face with 
fortune, which he defies. On deliberate choice, and from grounds 
of character, he has elected his part to live and die for, and dies with 
grandeur. This race has added new elements to humanity, and has 
a deeper root in the world. 

They have great range of scale, from ferocity to exquisite refine- 
ment. With larger scale, they have great retrieving power. After 
running each tendency to an extreme, they try another tack with 
equal heat. More intellectual than other races, when they live with 
other races, they do not take their language, but bestow their own. 
They subsidize other nations, and are not subsidized. They proselyte, 
and are not proselyted. They assimilate other races to themselves, 
and are not assimilated. The English did not calculate the conquest 
of the Indies. It fell to their character. So they administer in different 
parts of the world, the codes of every empire and race; in Canada, 
old French law; in the Mauritius, the Code Napoleon; in the West 
Indies, the edicts of the Spanish Cortes; in the East Indies, the Laws 
of Menu; in the Isle of Man, of the Scandinavian Thing; at the Cape 
of Good Hope, of the old Netherlands; and in the Ionian Islands, the 
Pandects of Justinian. 

They are very conscious of their advantageous position in history. 
England is the lawgiver, the patron, the instructor, the ally. Com- 
pare the tone of the French and of the English press : the first queru- 
lous, captious, sensitive about English opinion; the English press is 
never timorous about French opinion, but arrogant and contemp- 
tuous. 

They are testy and headstrong through an excess of will and bias; 
churlish as men sometimes please to be who do not forget a debt, 
who ask no favors, and who will do what they like with their own. 
With education and intercourse, these asperities wear off, and leave 
the good will pure. If anatomy is reformed according to national 



CHARACTER 385 

tendencies, I suppose, the spleen will hereafter be found in the 
Englishman, not found in the American, and differencing the one 
from the other. I anticipate another anatomical discovery, that this 
organ will be found to be cortical and caducous, that they are super- 
ficially morose, but at last tender-hearted, herein differing from Rome 
and the Latin nations. Nothing savage, nothing mean, resides in the 
English heart. They are subject to panics of credulity and of rage, 
but the temper of the nation, however disturbed, settles itself soon 
and easily, as, in this temperate zone, the sky after whatever storms 
clears again, and serenity is its normal condition. 

A saving stupidity masks and protects their perception as the 
curtain of the eagle's eye. Our swifter Americans, when they first 
deal with English, pronounce them stupid; but, later, do them justice 
as people who wear well, or hide their strength. To understand the 
power of performance that is in their finest wits, in the patient New- 
ton, or in the versatile transcendent poets, or in the Dugdales, 
Gibbons, Hallams, Eldons, and Peels, one should see how English 
day-laborers hold out. High and low, they are of an unctuous 
texture. There is an adipocere in their constitution, as if they had oil 
also for their mental wheels, and could perform vast amounts of 
work without damaging themselves. 

Even the scale of expense on which people live, and to which 
scholars and professional men conform, proves the tension of their 
muscle, when vast numbers are found who can each lift this 
enormous load. I might even add, their daily feasts argue a savage 
vigor of body. 

No nation was ever so rich in able men; "gentlemen," as Charles 
I. said of Strafford, "whose abilities might make a prince rather 
afraid than ashamed in the greatest affairs of state;" men of such 
temper that, like Baron Vere, "had one seen him returning from a 
victory, he would by his silence have suspected that he had lost the 
day; and, had he beheld him in a retreat, he would have collected 
him a conqueror by the cheerfulness of his spirit,"^ 

The following passage from the Heimskringla might almost stand 
as a portrait of the modern Englishman: — "Haldor was very stout 
and strong, and remarkably handsome in appearances. King Harold 

1 Fuller. Worthies of England. 



386 ENGLISH TRAITS 

gave him this testimony, that he, among all his men, cared least 
about doubtful circumstances, whether they betokened danger or 
pleasure; for, whatever turned up, he was never in higher nor in 
lower spirits, never slept less nor more on account of them, nor ate 
nor drank but according to his custom. Haldor was not a man of 
many words, but short in conversation, told his opinion bluntly, and 
was obstinate and hard : and this could not please the king, who had 
many clever people about him, zealous in his service. Haldor 
remained a short time with the king, and then came to Iceland, 
where he took up his abode in Hiardaholt, and dwelt in that farm 
to a very advanced age."^ 

The national temper, in the civil history, is not flashy or whiffing. 
The slow, deep English mass smoulders with fire, which at last sets 
all its borders in flame. The wrath of London is not French wrath, 
but has a long memory, and, in its hottest heat, a register and rule. 

Half their strength they put not forth. They are capable of a 
sublime resolution, and if hereafter the war of races, often predicted, 
and making itself a war of opinions also (a question of despotism 
and liberty coming from Eastern Europe), should menace the 
English civilization, these sea-kings may take once again to their 
floating castles, and find a new home and a second millennium of 
power in their colonies. 

The stability of England is the security of the modern world. If 
the English race were as mutable as the French, what reliance? But 
the English stand for liberty. The conservative, money-loving, lord- 
loving English are yet liberty-loving; and so freedom is safe: for 
they have more personal force than any other people. The nation 
always resist the immoral action of their government. They think 
humanely on the affairs of France, of Turkey, of Poland, of Hungary, 
of Schleswig-Holstein, though overborne by the statecraft of the 
rulers at last. 

Does the early history of each tribe show the permanent bias, 
which, though not less potent, is masked, as the tribe spreads its 
activity into colonies, commerce, codes, arts, letters? The early 
history shows it, as the musician plays the air which he proceeds to 
conceal in a tempest of variations. In Alfred, in the Northmen, one 

2 Heimskringla, Laing's translation, vol. iii., p. 37. 



COCKAYNE 387 

may read the genius of the EngUsh society, namely, that private Ufe 
is the place of honor. Glory, a career, and ambition, words familiar 
to the longitude of Paris, are seldom heard in English speech. Nelson 
wrote from their hearts his homely telegraph, "England expects every 
man to do his duty." 

For actual service, for the dignity of a profession, or to appease 
diseased or inflamed talent, the army and navy may be entered (the 
worst boys doing well in the navy) ; and the civil service, in depart- 
ments where serious official work is done; and they hold in esteem 
the barrister engaged in the severer studies of the law. But the calm, 
sound, and most British Briton shrinks from public life, as charla- 
tanism, and respects an economy founded on agriculture, coal-mines, 
manufactures, or trade, which secures an independence through 
the creation of real values. 

They wish neither to command nor obey, but to be kings in their 
own houses. They are intellectual and deeply enjoy literature; they 
like well to have the world served up to them in books, maps, 
models, and every mode of exact information, and, though not 
creators in art, they value its refinement. They are ready for leisure, 
can direct and fill their own day, nor need so much as others the 
constraint of a necessity. But the history of the nation discloses, at 
every turn, this original predilection for private independence, and, 
however this incUnation may have been disturbed by the bribes with 
which their vast colonial power has warped men out of orbit, the 
inclination endures, and forms and reforms the laws, letters, manners, 
and occupations. They choose that welfare which is compatible with 
the commonwealth, knowing that such alone is stable; as wise mer- 
chants prefer investments in the three per cents. 

CHAPTER IX 

COCKAYNE 

The EngUsh are a nation of humorists. Individual right is pushed 
to the uttermost bound compatible with public order. Property is so 
perfect, that it seems the craft of that race, and not to exist elsewhere. 
The king cannot step on an acre which the peasant refuses to sell. 



388 ENGLISH TRAITS 

A testator endows a dog or a rookery, and Europe cannot interfere 
with his absurdity. Every individual has his particular way of living, 
which he pushes to folly, and the decided sympathy of his com- 
patriots is engaged to back up Mr. Crump's whim by statutes, and 
chancellors, and horse-guards. There is no freak so ridiculous but 
some Englishman has attempted to immortalize by money and law. 
British citizenship is as omnipotent as Roman was. Mr. Cockayne is 
very sensible of this. The pursy man means by freedom the right 
to do as he pleases, and does wrong in order to feel his freedom, 
and makes a conscience of persisting in it. 

He is intensely patriotic, for his country is so small. His confidence 
in the power and performance of his nation makes him provokingly 
incurious about other nations. He dislikes foreigners. Swedenborg, 
who lived much in England, notes "the simiHtude of minds among 
the English, in consequence of which they contract familiarity with 
friends who are of that nation, and seldom with others: and they 
regard foreigners, as one looking through a telescope from the top 
of a palace regards those who dwell or wander about out of the 
city." A much older traveller, the Venetian who wrote the "Relation 
of England,"^ in 1500, says: — "The English are great lovers of them- 
selves, and of everything belonging to them. They think that there 
are no other men than themselves, and no other world but England; 
and, whenever they see a handsome foreigner, they say that he 
looks like an Englishman, and it is a great pity he should not be an 
Englishman; and whenever they partake of any delicacy with a 
foreigner, they ask him whether such a thing is made in his country." 
When he adds epithets of praise, his climax is "so English"; and 
when he wishes to pay you the highest compliment, he says, I should 
not know you from an Englishman. France is, by its natural con- 
trast, a kind of black-board on which English character draws its 
own traits in chalk. This arrogance habitually exhibits itself in 
allusions to the French. I suppose that all men of English blood in 
America, Europe, or Asia, have a secret feeling of joy that they are 
not French natives. Mr. Coleridge is said to have given public thanks 
to God, at the close of a lecture, that he had defended him from being 
able to utter a single sentence in the French language. I have found 
^Printed by the Camden Society. 



COCKJVYNE 389 

that Englishmen have such a good opinion of England, that the 
ordinary phrases, in all good society, of postponing or disparaging 
one's own things in talking with a stranger are seriously mistaken 
by them for an insuppressible homage to the merits of their nation; 
and the New Yorker or Pennsylvanian who modesdy laments the 
disadvantage of a new country, log huts, and savages, is surprised by 
the instant and unfeigned commiseration of the whole company, 
who plainly account all the world out of England a heap of rubbish. 

The same insular limitation pinches his foreign politics. He sticks 
to his traditions and usages, and, so help him God! he will force his 
island by-laws down the throat of great countries, like India, China, 
Canada, Australia, and not only so, but impose Wapping on the 
Congress of Vienna, and trample down all nationalities with his 
taxed boots. Lord Chatham goes for liberty, and no taxation without 
representation; — for that is British law; but not a hobnail shall they 
dare make in America, but buy their nails in England, — for that 
also is British law; and the fact that British commerce was to be 
re-created by the independence of America took them all by surprise. 

In short, I am afraid that English nature is so rank and aggressive 
as to be a Httle incompatible with every other. The world is not wide 
enough for two. 

But, beyond this nationality, it must be admitted, the island offers 
a daily worship to the old Norse god Brage, celebrated among our 
Scandinavian forefathers, for his eloquence and majestic air. The 
English have a steady courage, that fits them for great attempts and 
endurance: they have also a petty courage, through which every 
man delights in showing himself for what he is, and in doing what 
he can; so that, in all companies, each of them has too good an opin- 
ion of himself to imitate anybody. He hides no defect of his form, 
features, dress, connection, or birthplace, for he thinks every circum- 
stance belonging to him comes recommended to you. If one of them 
have a bald, or a red, or a green head, or bow legs, or a scar, or mark, 
or a paunch, or a squeaking or a raven voice, he has persuaded 
himself that there is something modish and becoming in it, and that 
it sits well on him. 

But nature makes nothing in vain, and this Httle superfluity of self- 
regard in the English brain is one of the secrets of their power and 



390 ENGLISH TRAITS 

history. For, it sets every man on being and doing what he really is 
and can. It takes away a dodging, skulking, secondary air, and 
encourages a frank and manly bearing, so that each man makes the 
most of himself, and loses no opportunity for want of pushing. A 
man's personal defects will commonly have with the rest of the 
world precisely that importance which they have to himself. If he 
makes hght of them, so will other men. We all find in these a con- 
venient metre of character, since a little man would be ruined by the 
vexation. I remember a shrewd politician, in one of our western 
cities, told me, "that he had known several successful statesmen made 
by their foible." And another, an ex-governor of IlHnois, said to me, 
"If a man knew anything, he would sit in a corner and be modest; 
but he is such an ignorant peacock, that he goes bustling up and 
down, and hits on extraordinary discoveries." 

There is also this benefit in brag, that the speaker is unconsciously 
expressing his own ideal. Humor him by all means, draw it all out, 
and hold him to it. Their culture generally enables the travelled 
English to avoid any ridiculous extremes of this self-pleasing, and to 
give it an agreeable air. Then the natural disposition is fostered by 
the respect which they find entertained in the world for English 
ability. It was said of Louis XIV., that his gait and air were becom- 
ing enough in so great a monarch, yet would have been ridiculous 
in another man; so the prestige of the English name warrants a 
certain confident bearing, which a Frenchman or Belgian could not 
carry. At all events, they feel themselves at liberty to assume the 
most extraordinary tone on the subject of English merits. 

An English lady on the Rhine, hearing a German speaking of her 
party as foreigners, exclaimed, "No, we are not foreigners; we are 
English; it is you that are foreigners." They tell you daily, in Lon- 
don, the story of the Frenchman and Englishman who quarrelled. 
Both were unwilling to fight, but their companions put them up to 
it; at last, it was agreed that they should fight alone, in the dark, 
and with pistols: the candles were put out, and the EngHshman, to 
make sure not to hit anybody, fired up the chimney, and brought 
down the Frenchman. They have no curiosity about foreigners, and 
answer any information you may volunteer with "Oh, oh!" until the 
informant makes up his mind that they shall die in their ignorance 



COCKAYNE 391 

for any help he will ofJer. There are really no limits to this conceit, 
though brighter men among them make painful efforts to be candid. 

The habit of brag runs through all classes, from the Times news- 
paper through politicians and poets, through Wordsworth, Carlyle, 
Mill, and Sydney Smith, down to the boys of Eton. In the gravest 
treatise on political economy, in a philosophical essay, in books of 
science, one is surprised by the most innocent exhibition of unflinch- 
ing nationality. In a tract on Corn, a most amiable and accomplished 
gentleman writes thus: — "Though Britain, according to Bishop 
Berkeley's idea, were surrounded by a wall of brass ten thousand 
cubits in height, still she would as far excel the rest of the globe in 
riches, as she now does, both in this secondary quality, and in the 
more important ones of freedom, virtue, and science."^ 

The Enghsh dislike the American structure of society, whilst yet 
trade, mills, public education, and chartism are doing what they can 
to create in England the same social condition. America is the 
paradise of the economists; is the favorable exception invariably 
quoted to the rules of ruin; but when he speaks directly of the 
Americans, the islander forgets his philosophy, and remembers his 
disparaging anecdotes. 

But this childish patriotism costs something, like all narrowness. 
The English sway of their colonies has no root of kindness. They 
govern by their arts and ability; they are more just than kind; and, 
whenever an abatement of their power is felt, they have not concil- 
iated the affection on which to rely. 

Coarse local distinctions, as those of nation, province, or town, are 
useful in the absence of real ones; but we must not insist on these 
accidental Hnes. Individual traits are always triumphing over 
national ones. There is no fence in metaphysics discriminating 
Greek, or English, or Spanish science, ^sop, and Montaigne, Cer- 
vantes, and Saadi are men of the world; and to wave our own flag at 
the dinner-table or in the University, is to carry the boisterous dulness 
of a fire-club into a polite circle. Nature and destiny are always on 
the watch for our follies. Nature trips us up when we strut; and 
there are curious examples in history on this very point of national 
pride. 

^ William Spence. 



392 ENGLISH TRAITS 

George o£ Cappadocia, born at Epiphania in Cilicia, was a low 
parasite, who got a lucrative contract to supply the army with bacon. 
A rogue and informer, he got rich, and was forced to run from 
justice. He saved his money, embraced Arianism, collected a library, 
and got promoted by a faction to the episcopal throne of Alexandria. 
When Julian came, a.d. 361, George was dragged to prison; the 
prison was burst open by the mob, and George was lynched, as he 
deserved. And this precious knave became, in good time. Saint 
George of England, patron of chivalry, emblem of victory and 
civility, and the pride of the best blood of the modern world. 

Strange, that the solid truth-speaking Briton should derive from an 
impostor. Strange, that the New World should have no better luck, 
— that broad America must wear the name of a thief. Amerigo Ves- 
pucci, the pickle-dealer at Seville, who went out, in 1499, a subaltern 
with Hojeda, and whose highest naval rank was boatswain's mate 
in an expedition that never sailed, managed in this lying world to 
supplant Columbus, and baptize half the earth with his own dis- 
honest name. Thus nobody can throw stones. We are equally badly 
off in our founders; and the false pickle-dealer is an offset to the 
false bacon-seller. 



CHAPTER X 



There is no country in which so absolute a homage is paid to 
wealth. In America, there is a touch of shame when a man exhibits 
the evidences of large property, as if, after all, it needed apology. 
But the EngUshman has pure pride in his wealth, and esteems it a 
final certificate. A coarse logic rules throughout all English souls; — 
if you have merit, can you not show it by your good clothes, and coach 
and horses ? How can a man be a gentleman without a pipe of wine ? 

Haydon says, "There is a fierce resolution to make every man 
live according to the means he possesses." There is a mixture of 
religion in it. They are under the Jewish law, and read with sonorous 
emphasis that their days shall be long in the land, they shall have 
sons and daughters, flocks and herds, wine and oil. In exact propor- 



WEALTH 393 

tion, is the reproach of poverty. They do not wish to be represented 
except by opulent men. An EngHshman who has lost his fortune, is 
said to have died of a broken heart. The last term of insult is, "a 
beggar." Nelson said, "The want of fortune is a crime which I 
can never get over." Sydney Smith said, "Poverty is infamous in 
England." And one of their recent writers speaks, in reference to a 
private and scholastic life, of "the grave moral deterioration which 
follows an empty exchequer." You shall find this sentiment, if not 
so frankly put, yet deeply impHed, in the novels and romances of the 
present century, and not only in these, but in biography, and in the 
votes of public assemblies, in the tone of the preaching, and in the 
table-talk. 

I was lately turning over Wood's AthencE Oxonienses, and look- 
ing naturally for another standard in a chronicle of the scholars of 
Oxford for two hundred years. But I found the two disgraces in that, 
as in most English books, are, first, disloyalty to Church and State, 
and, second, to be born poor, or to come to poverty. A natural fruit 
of England is the brutal political economy. Malthus finds no cover 
laid at nature's table for the laborer's son. In 1809, the majority in 
Parliament expressed itself by the language of Mr. Fuller in the 
House of Commons, "If you do not like the country, damn you, you 
can leave it." When Sir S. Romilly proposed his bill forbidding 
parish officers to bind children apprentices at a greater distance than 
forty miles from their home, Peel opposed, and Mr. Wortley said, 
"Though in the higher ranks, to cultivate family affections was a 
good thing, 'twas not so among the lower orders. Better take them 
away from those who might deprave them. And it was highly inju- 
rious to trade to stop binding to manufactures, as it must raise the 
price of labor, and of manufactured goods." 

The respect for truth of facts in England is equalled only by the 
respect for wealth. It is at once the pride of art of the Saxon, as he is 
a wealth-maker, and his passion for independence. The Englishman 
believes that every man must take care of himself, and has himself to 
thank, if he do not mend his condition. To pay their debts is their 
national point of honor. From the Exchequer and the East India 
House to the huckster's shop, everything prospers, because it is 
solvent. The British armies are solvent, and pay for what they take. 



394 ENGLISH TRAITS 

The British Empire is solvent; for, in spite of the huge national debt, 
the valuation mounts. During the war from 1789 to 1815, whilst 
they complained that they were taxed within an inch of their lives, 
and, by dint of enormous taxes, were subsidizing all the continent 
against France, the English were growing rich every year faster than 
any people ever grew before. It is their maxim, that the weight of 
taxes must be calculated not by what is taken, but by what is left. 
Solvency is in the ideas and mechanism of an Englishman. The 
Crystal Palace is not considered honest until it pays; — no matter how 
much convenience, beauty, or eclat, it must be self-supporting. They 
are contented with slower steamers, as long as they know the swifter 
boats lose money. They proceed logically by the double method of 
labor and thrift. Every household exhibits an exact economy, and 
nothing of that uncalculated headlong expenditure which families 
use in America. If they cannot pay, they do not buy; for they have 
no presumption of better fortunes next year, as our people have; 
and they say without shame, I cannot afford it. Gentlemen do not 
hesitate to ride in the second-class cars, or in the second cabin. An 
economist, or a man who can proportion his means and his ambition, 
or bring the year round with expenditure which expresses his char- 
acter, without embarrassing one day of his future, is already a master 
of life, and a freeman. Lord Burleigh writes to his son, "that one 
ought never to devote more than two-thirds of his income to the 
ordinary expenses of life, since the extraordinary will be certain to 
absorb the other third." 

The ambition to create value evokes every kind of ability, govern- 
ment becomes a manufacturing corporation, and every house a mill. 
The headlong bias to utility will let no talent lie in a napkin, — if 
possible, will teach spiders to weave silk stockings. An Englishman, 
while he eats and drinks no more, or not much more, than another 
man, labors three times as many hours in the course of a year as any 
other European; or his life as a workman is three lives. He works 
fast. Everything in England is at a quick pace. They have rein- 
forced their own productivity by the creation of that marvellous 
machinery which differences this age from any other age. 

'Tis a curious chapter in modern history, the growth of the 
machine-shop. Six hundred years ago Roger Bacon explained the 



WEALTH 395 

precession of the equinoxes, the consequent necessity of the reform 
of the calendar; measured the length of the year, invented gunpow- 
der; and announced (as if looking from his lofty cell, over five 
centuries, into ours), "that machines can be constructed to drive ships 
more rapidly than a whole galley of rowers could do; nor would they 
need anything but a pilot to steer them. Carriages also might be 
constructed to move with an incredible speed, without the aid of any 
animal. Finally, it would not be impossible to make machines which, 
by means of a suit of wings, should fly in the air in the manner of 
birds." But the secret slept with Bacon. The six hundred years have 
not yet fulfilled his words. Two centuries ago the sawing of timber 
was done by hand; the carriage wheels ran on wooden axles; the 
land was tilled by wooden ploughs. And it was to Htde purpose 
that they had pit-coal, or that looms were improved, unless Watt 
and Stephenson had taught them to work force-pumps and power- 
looms by steam. The great strides were all taken within the last 
hundred years. The Life of Sir Robert Peel, who died the other day, 
the model Englishman, very properly has for a frontispiece a draw- 
ing of the spinning-jenny, which wove the web of his fortunes. Har- 
greaves invented the spinning-jenny, and died in a workhouse. 
Arkwright improved the invention; and the machine dispensed with 
the work of ninety-nine men: that is, one spinner could do as much 
work as one hundred had done before. The loom was improved 
further. But the men would sometimes strike for wages, and com- 
bine against the masters, and, about 1829-30, much fear was felt, lest 
the trade would be drawn away by these interruptions, and the 
emigration of the spinners to Belgium and the United States. Iron 
and steel are very obedient. Whether it were not possible to make 
a spinner that would not rebel, nor mutter, nor scowl, nor strike for 
wages, nor emigrate ? At the solicitation of the masters, after a mob 
and riot at Staley Bridge, Mr. Roberts, of Manchester, undertook to 
create this peaceful fellow, instead of the quarrelsome fellow God 
had made. After a few trials he succeeded, and in 1830 procured a 
patent for his self-acting mule; a creation the delight of mill-owners, 
and "destined," they said, "to restore order among the industrious 
classes;" a machine requiring only a child's hand to piece the broken 
yarns. As Arkwright had destroyed domestic spinning, so Roberts 



396 ENGLISH TRAITS 

destroyed the factory spinner. The power of machinery in Great 
Britain, in mills, has been computed to be equal to 600,000,000 men, 
one man being able by the aid of steam to do the work which 
required two hundred and fifty men to accomplish fifty years ago. 
The production has been commensurate. England already had this 
laborious race, rich soil, water, wood, coal, iron, and favorable 
climate. Eight hundred years ago commerce had made it rich, and 
it was recorded, "England is the richest of all the northern nations." 
The Norman historians recite that, "in 1067, William carried with 
him into Normandy, from England, more gold and silver than had 
ever before been seen in Gaul." But when to this labor and trade 
and these native resources was added this goblin of steam, with his 
myriad arms, never tired, working night and day everlastingly, the 
amassing of property has run out of all figures. It makes the motor 
of the last ninety years. The steampipe has added to her population 
and wealth the equivalent of four or five Englands. Forty thousand 
ships are entered in Lloyd's lists. The yield of wheat has gone on 
from 2,000,000 quarters in the time of the Stuarts, to 13,000,000 in 
1854. A thousand million of pounds sterling are said to compose the 
floating money of commerce. In 1848 Lord John Russell stated that 
the people of this country had laid out ,^300,000,000 of capital in 
railways in the last four years. But a better measure than these 
sounding figures is the estimate that there is wealth enough in 
England to support the entire population in idleness for one year. 

The wise, versatile, all-giving machinery makes chisels, roads, loco- 
motives, telegraphs. Whitworth divides a bar to a millionth of an 
inch. Steam twines huge cannon into wreaths, as easily as it braids 
straw, and vies with the volcanic forces which twisted the strata. It 
can clothe shingle mountains with ship-oaks, make sword-blades that 
will cut gun-barrels in two. In Egypt, it can plant forests, and bring 
rain after three thousand years. Already it is ruddering the balloon, 
and the next war will be fought in the air. But another machine 
more potent in England than steam, is the Bank. It votes an issue of 
bills, population is stimulated, and cities rise; it refuses loans, and 
emigration empties the country; trade sinks; revolutions break out; 
kings are dethroned. By these new agents our social system is 
moulded. By dint of steam and of money, war and commerce are 



WEALTH 397 

changed. Nations have lost their old omnipotence; the patriotic tie 
does not hold. Nations are getting obsolete, we go and live where 
we will. Steam has enabled men to choose what law they will live 
under. Money makes place for them. The telegraph is a limp-band 
that will hold the Fenris-wolf of war. For now that a telegraph 
line runs through France and Europe, from London, every message 
it transmits makes stronger by one thread the band which war will 
have to cut. 

The introduction of these elements gives new resources to existing 
proprietors. A sporting duke may fancy that the state depends on the 
House of Lords, but the engineer sees that every stroke of the steam- 
piston gives value to the duke's land, fills it with tenants; doubles, 
quadruples, centuples the duke's capital, and creates new measures 
and new necessities for the culture of his children. Of course, it 
draws the nobility into the competition as stockholders in the mine, 
the canal, the railway, in the application of steam to agriculture, and 
sometimes into trade. But it also introduces large classes into the 
same competition; the old energy of the Norse race arms itself with 
these magnificent powers; new men prove an overmatch for the 
land-owner, and the mill buys out the castle. Scandinavian Thor, 
who once forged his bolts in icy Hecla and built galleys by lonely 
fiords, in England has advanced with the times, has shorn his beard, 
enters Parliament, sits down at a desk in the India House, and lends 
Miollnir to Birmingham for a steam-hammer. 

The creation of wealth in England in the last ninety years is a main 
fact in modern history. The wealth of London determines prices 
all over the globe. All things precious, or useful, or amusing, or 
intoxicating, are sucked into this commerce and floated to London. 
Some English private fortunes reach, and some exceed, a million of 
dollars a year, A hundred thousand palaces adorn the island. All 
that can feed the senses and passions, all that can succor the talent, 
or arm the hands, of the intelligent middle class, who never spare 
in what they buy for their own consumption; all that can aid science, 
gratify taste, or soothe comfort, is in open market. Whatever is 
excellent and beautiful in civil, rural, or ecclesiastic architecture; in 
fountain, garden, or grounds; the English noble crosses sea and land 
to see and to copy at home. The taste and science of thirty peaceful 



398 ENGLISH TRAITS 

generations; the gardens which Evelyn planted; the temples and 
pleasure-houses which Inigo Jones and Christopher Wren built; the 
wood that Gibbons carved; the taste of foreign and domestic artists, 
Shenstone, Pope, Brown, Loudon, Paxton, are in the vast auction, 
and the hereditary principle heaps on the owner of to-day the bene- 
fit of ages of owners. The present possessors are to the full as absolute 
as any of their fathers, in choosing and procuring what they Hke. 
This comfort and splendor, the breadth of lake and mountain, 
tillage, pasture, and park, sumptuous castle and modern villa, — all 
consist with perfect order. They have no revolutions; no horse- 
guards dictating to the crown; no Parisian poissardes and barricades; 
no mob: but drowsy habitude, daily dress-dinners, wine, and ale, and 
beer, and gin, and sleep. 

With this power of creation, and this passion for independence, 
property has reached an ideal perfection. It is felt and treated as the 
national life-blood. The laws are framed to give property the secur- 
est possible basis, and the provisions to lock and transmit it have 
exercised the cunningest heads in a profession which never admits a 
fool. The rights of property nothing but felony and treason can 
override. The house is a castle which the king cannot enter. The 
Bank is a strong box to which the king has no key. Whatever surly 
sweetness possession can give, is tested in England to the dregs. 
Vested rights are awful things, and absolute possession gives the 
smallest freeholder identity of interest with the duke. High stone 
fences and padlocked garden-gates announce the absolute will of 
the owner to be alone. Every whim of exaggerated egotism is put 
into stone and iron, into silver and gold, with costly deliberation and 
detail. 

An Englishman hears that the Queen Dowager wishes to establish 
some claim to put her park paling a rod forward into his grounds, 
so as to get a coachway, and save her a mile to the avenue. Instantly 
he transforms his paUng into stone-masonry, solid as the walls of 
Cuma, and all Europe cannot prevail on him to sell or compound 
for an inch of the land. They deUght in a freak as the proof of their 
sovereign freedom. Sir Edward Boynton, at Spic Park, at Caden- 
ham, on a precipice of incomparable prospect, built a house like a 
long barn, which had not a window on the prospect side. Strawberry 



WEALTH 399 

Hill of Horace Walpole, Fonthill Abbey of Mr. Beckford, were 
freaks; and Newstead Abbey became one in the hands of Lord 
Byron. 

But the proudest result of this creation has been the great and 
refined forces it has put at the disposal of the private citizen. In the 
social world, an Englishman to-day has the best lot. He is a king 
in a plain coat. He goes with the most powerful protection, keeps the 
best company, is armed by the best education, is seconded by wealth; 
and his English name and accidents are like a flourish of trumpets 
announcing him. This, with his quiet style of manners, gives him 
the power of a sovereign, without the inconveniences which belong 
to that rank. I must prefer the condition of an English gendeman of 
the better class, to that of any potentate in Europe, — whether for 
travel, or for opportunity of society, or for access to means of science 
or study, or for mere comfort and easy healthy relation to people at 
home. 

Such as we have seen is the wealth of England, a mighty mass, 
and made good in whatever details we care to explore. The cause 
and spring of it is the wealth of temperament in the people. The 
wonder of Britain is this plenteous nature. Her worthies are ever 
surrounded by as good men as themselves; each is a captain a 
hundred strong, and that wealth of men is represented again in the 
faculty of each individual, — that he has waste strength, power to 
spare. The English are so rich, and seem to have established a tap- 
root in the bowels of the planet, because they are constitutionally 
fertile and creative. 

But a man must keep an eye on his servants, if he would not have 
them rule him. Man is a shrewd inventor, and is ever taking the 
hint of a new machine from his own structure, adapting some secret 
of his own anatomy in iron, wood, and leather, to some required 
function in the work of the world. But it is found that the machine 
unmans the user. What he gains in making cloth, he loses in general 
power. There should be temperance in making cloth, as well as in 
eating. A man should not be a silk-worm, nor a nation a tent of 
caterpillars. The robust rural Saxon degenerates in the mills to the 
Leicester stockinger, to the imbecile Manchester spinner, — far on the 
way to be spiders and needles. The incessant repetition of the same 



400 ENGLISH TRAITS 

hand-work dwarfs the man, robs him of his strength, wit, and versa- 
tihty, to make a pin-poHsher, a buckle-maker, or any other specialty; 
and presently, in a change of industry, whole towns are sacrificed like 
ant-hills, when the fashion of shoe-strings supersedes buckles, when 
cotton takes the place of linen, or railways of turnpikes, or when 
commons are inclosed by landlords. Then society is admonished of 
the mischief of the division of labor, and that the best political 
economy is care and culture of men ; for, in these crises, all are ruined 
except such as are proper individuals, capable of thought, and of new 
choice and the application of their talent to new labor. Then again 
come in new calamities. England is aghast at the disclosure of her 
fraud in the adulteration of food, of drugs, and of almost every 
fabric in her mills and shops; finding that milk will not nourish, nor 
sugar sweeten, nor bread satisfy, nor pepper bite the tongue, nor glue 
stick. In true England all is false and forged. This too is the reaction 
of machinery, but of the larger machinery of commerce. 'Tis not, 
I suppose, want of probity, so much as the tyranny of trade, which 
necessitates a perpetual competition of underselling, and that again 
a perpetual deterioration of the fabric. 

The machinery has proved, like the balloon, unmanageable, and 
flies away with the aeronaut. Steam, from the first, hissed and 
screamed to warn him; it was dreadful with its explosion, and 
crushed the engineer. The machinist has wrought and watched, 
engineers and firemen without number have been sacrificed in learn- 
ing to tame and guide the monster. But harder still it has proved to 
resist and rule the dragon Money, with his paper wings. Chancellors 
and Boards of Trade, Pitt, Peel, and Robinson, and their Parlia- 
ments, and their whole generation, adopted false principles, and 
went to their graves in the belief that they were enriching the 
country which they were impoverishing. They congratulated each 
other on ruinous expedients. It is rare to find a merchant who knows 
why a crisis occurs in trade, why prices rise or fall, or who knows the 
mischief of paper money. In the culmination of national prosperity, 
in the annexation of countries; building of ships, depots, towns; in 
the influx of tons of gold and silver; amid the chuckle of chancellors 
and financiers, it was found that bread rose to famine prices, that the 
yeoman was forced to sell his cow and pig, his tools, and his acre of 



WEALTH 401 

land; and the dreadful barometer of the poor-rates was touching the 
point of ruin. The poor-rate was sucking in the solvent classes, and 
forcing an exodus of farmers and mechanics. What befalls from 
the violence of financial crisis, befalls daily in the violence of artificial 
legislation. 

Such a wealth has England earned, ever new, bounteous, and aug- 
menting. But the question recurs, does she take the step beyond, 
namely, to the wise use, in view of the supreme wealth of nations? 
We estimate the wisdom of nations by seeing what they did with 
their surplus capital. And, in view of these injuries, some compen- 
sation has been attempted in England. A part of the money earned 
returns to the brain to buy schools, libraries, bishops, astronomers, 
chemists, and artists with; and a part to repair the wrongs of this 
intemperate weaving, by hospitals, savings-banks, Mechanics' Insti- 
tutes, public grounds, and other charities and amenities. But the 
antidotes are frightfully inadequate, and the evil requires a deeper 
cure, which time and a simpler social organization must supply. At 
present, she does not rule her wealth. She is simply a good England, 
but no divinity, or wise and instructed soul. She too is in the stream 
of fate, one victim more in a common catastrophe. 

But being in the fault, she has the misfortune of greatness to be 
held as the chief offender. England must be held responsible for 
the despotism of expense. Her prosperity, the splendor which so 
much manhood and talent and perseverance has thrown upon vulgar 
aims, is the very argument of materialism. Her success strengthens 
the hands of base wealth. Who can propose to youth poverty and 
wisdom, when mean gain has arrived at the conquest of letters and 
arts; when English success has grown out of the very renunciation of 
principles, and the dedication to outsides? A civility of trifles, of 
money and expense, an erudition of sensation takes place, and the 
putting as many impediments as we can, between the man and his 
objects. Hardly the bravest among them have the manliness to resist 
it successfully. Hence, it has come that not the aims of a manly life, 
but the means of meeting a certain ponderous expense, is that which 
is to be considered by a youth in England, emerging from his mi- 
nority. A large family is reckoned a misfortune. And it is a con- 
solation in the death of the young, that a source of expense is closed. 



402 ENGLISH TRAITS 

CHAPTER XI 

ARISTOCRACY 

The feudal character of the English state, now that it is getting 
obsolete, glares a little, in contrast with the democratic tendencies. 
The inequality of power and property shocks republican nerves. 
Palaces, halls, villas, walled parks, all over England, rival the splen- 
dor of royal seats. Many of the halls, like Haddon, or Kedleston, 
are beautiful desolations. The proprietor never saw them, or never 
lived in them. Primogeniture built these sumptuous piles, and, I 
suppose, it is the sentiment of every traveller, as it was mine, 'Twas 
well to come ere these were gone. Primogeniture is a cardinal rule 
of English property and institutions. Laws, customs, manners, the 
very persons and faces, affirm it. 

The frame of society is aristocratic, the taste of the people is loyal. 
The estates, names, and manners of the nobles flatter the fancy of 
the people, and conciliate the necessary support. In spite of broken 
faith, stolen charters, and the devastation of society by the profligacy 
of the court, we take sides as we read for the loyal England and 
King Charles's "return to his right" with his Cavaliers, — knowing 
what a heartless trifler he is, and what a crew of God-forsaken rob- 
bers they are. The people of England knew as much. But the fair 
idea of a settled government connecting itself with heraldic names, 
with the written and oral history of Europe, and, at last, with the 
Hebrew religion, and the oldest traditions of the world, was too 
pleasing a vision to be shattered by a few offensive realities, and the 
politics of shoemakers and costermongers. The hopes of the com- 
moners take the same direction with the interest of the patricians. 
Every man who becomes rich buys land, and does what he can to 
fortify the nobility, into which he hopes to rise. The Anglican clergy 
are identified with the aristocracy. Time and law have made the 
joining and moulding perfect in every part. The Cathedrals, the 
Universities, the national music, the popular romances, conspire to 
uphold the heraldry, which the current politics of the day are sap- 
ping. The taste of the people is conservative. They are proud of the 
castles, and of the language and symbol of chivalry. Even the word 



ARISTOCRACY 403 

lord is the luckiest style that is used in any language to designate a 
patrician. The superior education and manners of the nobles recom- 
mend them to the country. 

The Norwegian pirate got what he could, and held it for his 
eldest son. The Norman noble, who was the Norwegian pirate bap- 
tized, did Hkewise. There was this advantage of western over ori- 
ental nobiUty, that this was recruited from below. English history 
is aristocracy with the doors open. Who has courage and faculty, let 
him come in. Of course, the terms of admission to this club are 
hard and high. The selfishness of the nobles comes in aid of the 
interest of the nation to require signal merit. Piracy and war gave 
place to trade, politics, and letters; the war-lord to the law-lord; the 
law-lord to the merchant and the mill-owner; but the privilege was 
kept, whilst the means of obtaining it were changed. 

The foundations of these families lie deep in Norwegian exploits 
by sea, and Saxon sturdiness on land. All nobility in its beginnings 
was somebody's natural superiority. The things these English have 
done were not done without peril of life, nor without wisdom and 
conduct; and the first hands, it may be presumed, were often chal- 
lenged to show their right to their honors, or yield them to better 
men. "He that will be a head, let him be a bridge," said the Welsh 
chief Benegridran, when he carried all his men over the river on his 
back. "He shall have the book," said the mother of Alfred, "who 
can read it;" and Alfred won it by that title: and I make no doubt 
that feudal tenure was no sinecure, but baron, knight, and tenant 
often had their memories refreshed, in regard to the service by which 
they held their lands. The De Veres, Bohuns, Mowbrays, and Plan- 
tagenets were not addicted to contemplation. The Middle Age 
adorned itself with proofs of manhood and devotion. Of Richard 
Beauchamp, Earl of Warwick, the Emperor told Henry V. that no 
Christian king had such another knight for wisdom, nurture, and 
manhood, and caused him to be named, "Father of curtesie." "Our 
success in France," says the historian, "lived and died with him." ' 

The war-lord earned his honors, and no donation of land was 
large, as long as it brought the duty of protecting it, hour by hour, 
against a terrible enemy. In France and in England, the nobles were, 

^ Fuller's Worthies, II., p. 472. 



404 ENGLISH TRAITS 

down to a late day, born and bred to war: and the duel, which in 
peace still held them to the risks of war, diminished the envy that, 
in trading and studious nations, would else have pried into their 
title. They were looked on as men who played high for a great stake. 

Great estates are not sinecures, if they are to be kept great. A 
creative economy is the fuel of magnificence. In the same line of 
Warwick, the successor next but one to Beauchamp, was the stout 
earl of Henry VI. and Edward IV. Few esteemed themselves in 
the mode, whose heads were not adorned with the black ragged 
staff, his badge. At his house in London, six oxen were daily eaten 
at a breakfast; and every tavern was full of his meat; and who had 
any acquaintance in his family, should have as much boiled and 
roast as he could carry on a long dagger. 

The new age brings new qualities into request, the virtues of 
pirates gave way to those of planters, merchants, senators, and schol- 
ars. Comity, social talent, and fine manners, no doubt, have had 
their part also. I have met somewhere with a historiette, which, 
whether more or less true in its particulars, carries a general truth. 
"How came the Duke of Bedford by his great landed estates? His 
ancestor having travelled on the continent, a lively, pleasant man, 
became the companion of a foreign prince wrecked on the Dorset- 
shire coast, where Mr. Russell lived. The prince recommended him 
to Henry VIII., who, liking his company, gave him a large share 
of the plundered church lands." 

The pretence is that the noble is of unbroken descent from the 
Norman, and has never worked for eight hundred years. But the 
fact is otherwise. Where is Bohun ? where is De Vere ? The lawyer, 
the farmer, the silkmercer lies perdu under the coronet, and winks 
to the antiquary to say nothing; especially skilful lawyers, nobody's 
sons, who did some piece of work at a nice moment for government, 
and were rewarded with ermine. 

The national tastes of the English do not lead them to the Hfe of 
the courtier, but to secure the comfort and independence of their 
homes. The aristocracy are marked by their predilection for country- 
life. They are called the county-families. They have often no resi- 
dence in London, and only go thither a short time, during the 
season, to see the opera; but they concentrate the love and labor of 



ARISTOCRACY 405 

many generations on the building, planting, and decoration of their 
homesteads. Some of them are too old and too proud to wear titles, 
or, as Sheridan said to Coke, "disdain to hide their head in a coro- 
net"; and some curious examples are cited to show the stability of 
English families. Their proverb is that, fifty miles from London, a 
family will last a hundred years; at a hundred miles, two hundred 
years; and so on; but I doubt that steam, the enemy of time, as well 
as of space, will disturb these ancient rules. Sir Henry Wotton says 
of the first Duke of Buckingham, "He was born at Brookeby in 
Leicestershire, where his ancestors had chiefly continued about the 
space of four hundred years, rather without obscurity, than with any 
great lustre." ^ Wraxall says that, in 1781, Lord Surrey, afterwards 
Duke of Norfolk, told him that when the year 1783 should arrive, 
he meant to give a grand festival to all the descendants of the body 
of Jockey of Norfolk, to mark the day when the dukedom should 
have remained three hundred years in their house, since its creation 
by Richard IIL Pepys tells us, in writing of an Earl Oxford, in 1666, 
that the honor had now remained in that name and blood six hun- 
dred years. 

This long descent of famiUes and this cleaving through ages to 
the same spot of ground captivates the imagination. It has too a 
connection with the names of the towns and districts of the country. 

The names are excellent, — an atmosphere of legendary melody 
spread over the land. Older than all epics and histories, which clothe 
a nation, this under-shirt sits close to the body. What history too, 
and what stores of primitive and savage observation, it infolds! 
Cambridge is the bridge of the Cam; Sheffield the field of the river 
Sheaf; Leicester the castra or camp of the Lear or Leir (now Soar) ; 
Rochdale, of the Roch; Exeter or Excester, the castra of the Ex; 
Exmouth, Dartmouth, Sidmouth, Teignmouth, the mouths of the 
Ex, Dart, Sid, and Teign rivers. Waltham is strong town; RadcUfle 
is red cliff; and so on: — a sincerity and use in naming very striking 
to an American, whose country is whitewashed all over by unmean- 
ing names, the cast-off clothes of the country from which its emi- 
grants came; or named at a pinch from a psalm-tune. But the 
English are those "barbarians" of Jamblichus, who "are stable in 

^Reliquis Wottonianz, p. 208. 



406 ENGLISH TRAITS 

their manners, and firmly continue to employ the same words, which 
also are dear to the gods." 

'Tis an old sneer, that the Irish peerage drew their names from 
playbooks. The English lords do not call their lands after their own 
names, but call themselves after their lands, as if the man represented 
the country that bred him; and they rightly wear the token of the 
glebe that gave them birth; suggesting that the tie is not cut, but 
that there in London, — the crags of Argyle, the kail of Cornwall, the 
downs of Devon, the iron of Wales, the clays of Stafford, are neither 
forgetting nor forgotten, but know the man who was born by them, 
and who, like the long line of his fathers, has carried that crag, that 
shore, dale, fen, or woodland, in his blood and manners. It has, too, 
the advantage of suggesting responsibleness. A susceptible man could 
not wear a name which represented in a strict sense a city or a county 
of England, without hearing in it a challenge to duty and honor. 

The predilection of the patricians for residence in the country, 
combined with the degree of liberty possessed by the peasant, makes 
the safety of the English hall. Mirabeau wrote prophetically from 
England, in 1784, "If revolution break out in France, I tremble for 
the aristocracy: their chateaux will be reduced to ashes, and their 
blood spilt in torrents. The English tenant would defend his lord 
to the last extremity." The English go to their estates for grandeur. 
The French live at court, and exile themselves to their estates for 
economy. As they do not mean to live with their tenants, they do 
not conciliate them, but wring from them the last sous. Evelyn 
writes from Blois, in 1644, "The wolves are here in such numbers, 
that they often come and take children out of the streets: yet will 
not the Duke, who is sovereign here, permit them to be destroyed." 

In evidence of the wealth amassed by ancient families, the traveller 
is shown the palaces in Piccadilly, Burlington House, Devonshire 
House, Lansdowne House in Berkshire Square, and, lower down in 
the city, a few noble houses which still withstand in all their ampli- 
tude the encroachment of streets. The Duke of Bedford includes 
or included a mile square in the heart of London, where the British 
Museum, once Montague House, now stands, and the land occupied 
by Woburn Square, Bedford Square, Russell Square. The Marquis 
of Westminster built within a few years the series of squares called 



ARISTOCRACY 407 

Belgravia. Stafford House is the noblest palace in London. Nor- 
thumberland House holds its place by Charing Cross. Chesterfield 
House remains in Audley Street. Sion House and Holland House are 
in the suburbs. But most of the historical houses are masked or lost 
in the modern uses to which trade or charity has converted them. 
A multitude of town palaces contain inestimable galleries of art. 

In the country, the size of private estates is more impressive. From 
Barnard Castle I rode on the highway twenty-three miles from High 
Force, a fall of the Tees, towards Darlington, past Raby Castle, 
through the estate of the Duke of Cleveland. The Marquis of Bread- 
albane rides out of his house a hundred miles in a straight line to the 
sea, on his own property. The Duke of Sutherland owns the county 
of Sutherland, stretching across Scotland from sea to sea. The Duke 
of Devonshire, besides his other estates, owns 96,000 acres in the 
County of Derby. The Duke of Richmond has 40,000 acres at Good- 
wood, and 300,000 at Gordon Casde. The Duke of Norfolk's park 
in Sussex is fifteen miles in circuit. An agriculturist bought lately 
the island of Lewes, in Hebrides, containing 500,000 acres. The 
possessions of the Earl of Lonsdale gave him eight seats in Parlia- 
ment. This is the Heptarchy again: and before the Reform of 1832, 
one hundred and fifty-four persons sent three hundred and seven 
members to Parliament. The borough-mongers governed England. 

These large domains are growing larger. The great estates are 
absorbing the small freeholds. In 1786, the soil of England was 
owned by 250,000 corporations and proprietors; and, in 1822, by 
32,000. These broad estates find room in this narrow island. All 
over England, scattered at short intervals among ship-yards, mills, 
mines, and forges, are the paradises of the nobles, where the Uvelong 
repose and refinement are heightened by the contrast with the roar 
of industry and necessity, out of which you have stepped aside. 

I was surprised to observe the very small attendance usually in the 
House of Lords. Out of 573 peers, on ordinary days, only twenty or 
thirty. Where are they ? I asked. "At home on their estates, devoured 
by ennui, or in the Alps, or up the Rhine, in the Harz Mountains, 
or in Egypt, or in India, on the Ghauts." But, with such interests 
at stake, how can these men afford to neglect them? "Oh," rephed 
my friend, "why should they work for themselves, when every man 



408 ENGLISH TRAITS 

in England works for them, and will suffer before they come to 
harm?" The hardest radical instantly uncovers, and changes his 
tone to a lord. It was remarked, on the loth April, 1848 (the day 
of the Chartist demonstration), that the upper classes were, for the 
first time, actively interesting themselves in their own defence, and 
men of rank were sworn special constables, with the rest. "Besides, 
why need they sit out the debate ? Has not the Duke of Wellington, 
at this moment, their proxies, — the proxies of fifty peers in his 
pocket, to vote for them, if there be an emergency?" 

It is however true, that the existence of the House of Peers as a 
branch of the government entitles them to fill half the Cabinet; and 
their weight of property and station gives them a virtual nomination 
of the other half; whilst they have their share in the subordinate 
offices, as a school of training. This monopoly of political power 
has given them their intellectual and social eminence in Europe. A 
few law lords and a few political lords take the brunt of public 
business. In the army, the nobility fill a large part of the high com- 
missions, and give to these a tone of expense and splendor, and also 
of exclusiveness. They have borne their full share of duty and danger 
in this service; and there are few noble families which have not paid 
in some of their members, the debt of Hfe or limb, in the sacrifices 
of the Russian war. For the rest, the nobility have the lead in mat- 
ters of state, and of expense; in questions of taste, in social usages, 
in convivial and domestic hospitalities. In general, all that is required 
of them is to sit securely, to preside at public meetings, to counte- 
nance charities, and to give the example of that decorum so dear to 
the British heart. 

If one asks, in the critical spirit of the day, what service this class 
have rendered ? — uses appear, or they would have perished long ago. 
Some of these are easily enumerated, others more subtle make a part 
of unconscious history. Their institution is one step in the progress 
of society. For a race yields a nobility in some form, however we 
name the lords, as surely as it yields women. 

The English nobles are high-spirited, active, educated men, born 
to wealth and power, who have run through every country, and 
kept in every country the best company, have seen every secret of art 
and nature, and, when men of any ability or ambition, have been 



ARISTOCRACY 409 

consulted in the conduct of every important action. You cannot 
wield great agencies without lending yourself to them, and, when 
it happens that the spirit of the earl meets his rank and duties, we 
have the best examples of behavior. Power of any kind readily 
appears in the manners; and beneficent power, le talent de bien faire, 
gives a majesty which cannot be concealed or resisted. 

These people seem to gain as much as they lose by their position. 
They survey society as from the top of St. Paul's, and, if they never 
hear plain truth from men, they see the best of everything, in every 
kind, and they see things so grouped and amassed as to infer easily 
the sum and genius, instead of tedious particularities. Their good 
behavior deserves all its fame, and they have that simplicity, and that 
air of repose, which are the finest ornament of greatness. 

The upper classes have only birth, say the people here, and not 
thoughts. Yes, but they have manners, and 'tis wonderful how much 
talent runs into manners: — nowhere and never so much as in Eng- 
land. They have the sense of superiority, the absence of all the 
ambitious effort which disgusts in the aspiring classes, a pure tone 
of thought and feeling, and the power of command, among their 
other luxuries, the presence of the most accomplished men in their 
festive meetings. 

Loyalty is in the English a sub-religion. They wear the laws as 
ornaments, and walk by their faith in their painted May-Fair, as if 
among the forms of gods. The economist of 1855 who asks, of what 
use are the lords? may learn of Franklin to ask, of what use is a 
baby? They have been a social church proper to inspire sentiments 
mutually honoring the lover and the loved. Politeness is the ritual 
of society, as prayers are of the church; a school of manners, and 
a gentle blessing to the age in which it grew. 'Tis a romance adorn- 
ing English life with a larger horizon; a midway heaven, fulfilling 
to their sense their fairy tales and poetry. This, just as far as the 
breeding of the nobleman really made him brave, handsome, ac- 
complished, and great-hearted. 

On general grounds, whatever tends to form manners, or to finish 
men, has a great value. Every one who has tasted the delight of 
friendship, will respect every social guard which our manners can 
establish, tending to secure from the intrusion of frivolous and dis- 



410 ENGLISH TRAITS 

tasteful people. The jealousy of every class to guard itself, is a 
testimony to the reality they have found in life. When a man once 
knows that he has done justice to himself, let him dismiss all terrors 
of aristocracy as superstitions, so far as he is concerned. He who 
keeps the door of a mine, whether of cobalt, or mercury, or nickel, 
or plumbago, securely knows that the world cannot do without him. 
Everybody who is real is open and ready for that which is also real. 

Besides, these are they who make England that strong-box and 
museimi it is; who gather and protect works of art, dragged from 
amidst burning cities and revolutionary countries, and brought 
hither out of all the world. I look with respect at houses six, seven, 
eight hundred, or, like Warwick Casde, nine hundred years old. I 
pardoned high park-fences, when I saw that, besides does and 
pheasants, these have preserved Arundel marbles, Townley galleries, 
Howard and Spenserian libraries, Warwick and Portland vases, 
Saxon manuscripts, monastic architectures, millennial trees, and 
breeds of cattle elsewhere extinct. In these manors, after the frenzy 
of war and destruction subsides a little, the antiquary finds the 
frailest Roman jar, or crumbling Egyptian mummy-case, without 
so much as a new layer of dust, keeping the series of history un- 
broken, and waiting for its interpreter, who is sure to arrive. These 
lords are the treasurers and librarians of mankind, engaged by their 
pride and wealth to this function. 

Yet there were other works for British dukes to do. George 
Loudon, Quintinye, Evelyn, had taught them to make gardens. 
Arthur Young, Bakewell, and Mechi have made them agricultural. 
Scotland was a camp until the day of Culloden. The Dukes of Athol, 
Sutherland, Buccleugh, and the Marquis of Breadalbane have intro- 
duced the rape-culture, the sheep-farm, wheat, drainage, the planta- 
tion of forests, the artificial replenishment of lakes and ponds with 
fish, the renting of game-preserves. Against the cry of the old ten- 
antry, and the sympathetic cry of the EngUsh press, they have rooted 
out and planted anew, and now six millions of people live, and live 
better, on the same land that fed three millions. 

The Enghsh barons, in every period, have been brave and great, 
after the estimate and opinion of their times. The grand old halls 
scattered up and down in England are dumb vouchers to the state 



ARISTOCRACY 4I I 

and broad hospitality of their ancient lords. Shakespeare's portraits 
of good duke Humphrey, of Warwick, of Northumberland, of 
Talbot, were drawn in strict consonance with the traditions. A 
sketch of the Earl of Shrewsbury, from the pen of Queen Elizabeth's 
Archbishop Parker;^ Lord Herbert Cherbury's autobiography; the 
letters and essays of Sir Philip Sidney; the anecdotes preserved by 
the antiquaries Fuller and Collins; some glimpses at the interiors of 
noble houses, which we owe to Pepys and Evelyn; the details which 
Ben Jonson's masques (performed at Kenilworth, Althorpe, Belvoir, 
and other noble houses) record or suggest; down to Aubrey's pas- 
sages of the life of Hobbes in the house of the Earl of Devon, are 
favorable pictures of a romantic style of manners. Penshurst still 
shines for us, and its Christmas revels, "where logs not burn, but 
men." At Wilton House the "Arcadia" was written, amidst conver- 
sations with Fulke Greville, Lord Brooke, a man of no vulgar mind, 
as his own poems declare him. I must hold Ludlow Castle an 
honest house, for which Milton's "Comus" was written, and the 
company nobly bred which performed it with knowledge and sym- 
pathy. In the roll of nobles are found poets, philosophers, chemists, 
astronomers, also men of solid virtues and of lofty sentiments; often 
they have been the friends and patrons of genius and learning and 
especially of the fine arts; and at this moment almost every great 
house has its sumptuous picture-gallery. 

Of course, there is another side to this gorgeous show. Every 
victory was the defeat of a party only less worthy. Castles are 
proud things, but 'tis safest to be outside of them. War is a foul 
game, and yet war is not the worst part of aristocratic history. In 
later times, when the baron, educated only for war, with his brains 
paralyzed by his stomach, found himself idle at home, he grew fat 
and wanton, and a sorry brute. Grammont, Pepys, and Evelyn show 
the kennels to which the king and court went in quest of pleasure. 
Prostitutes taken from the theatres were made duchesses, their bas- 
tards dukes and earls. "The young men sat uppermost, the old 
serious lords were out of favor." The discourse that the king's 
companions had with him was "poor and frothy." No man who 
valued his head might do what these pot-companions familiarly 

^Dibdin's Literary Reminiscences, vol. i, xii. 



412 ENGLISH TRAITS 

did with the king. In logical sequence of these dignified revels, 
Pepys can tell the beggarly shifts to which the king was reduced, 
who could not find paper at his council table, and "no handkerchers" 
in his wardrobe, "and but three bands to his neck," and the linen- 
draper and the stationer were out of pocket, and refusing to trust 
him, and the baker will not bring bread any longer. Meantime the 
English Channel was swept and Lxjndon threatened by the Dutch 
fleet, manned, too, by English sailors, who, having been cheated of 
their pay for years by the king, enlisted with the enemy. 

The Selwyn correspondence, in the reign of George III., discloses 
a rottenness in the aristocracy which threatened to decompose the 
state. The sycophancy and sale of votes and honor for place and 
tide; lewdness, gaming, smugghng, bribery, and cheating; the sneer 
at the childish indiscretion of quarrelling with ten thousand a year; 
the want of ideas; the splendor of the tides, and the apathy of the 
nation, are instructive, and make the reader pause and explore the 
firm bounds which confined these vices to a handful of rich men. 
In the reign of the Fourth George things do not seem to have 
mended, and the rotten debauchee let down from a window by an 
inclined plane into his coach to take the air, was a scandal to Europe 
which the ill fame of his queen and of his family did nothing to 
retrieve. 

Under the present reign, the perfect decorum of the Court is 
thought to have put a check on the gross vices of the aristocracy; 
yet gaming, racing, drinking, and mistresses bring them down, and 
the democrat can sdll gather scandals if he will. Dismal anecdotes 
abound, verifying the gossip of the last generation of dukes served 
by bailiffs, with all their plate in pawn; of great lords living by the 
showing of their houses; and of an old man wheeled in his chair 
from room to room, whilst his chambers are exhibited to the visitor 
for money; of ruined dukes and earls living in exile for debt. The 
historic names of the Buckinghams, Beauforts, Marlboroughs, and 
Hertfords have gained no new lustre, and now and then darker 
scandals break out, ominous as the new chapters added under the 
Orleans dynasty to the "Causes Celehres" in France. Even peers 
who are men of worth and pubHc spirit are overtaken and embar- 
rassed by their vast expense. The respectable Duke of Devonshire, 



ARISTOCRACY 413 

willing to be the Mscenas and Lucullus of his island, is reported to 
have said that he cannot live at Chatsworth but one month in the 
year. Their many houses eat them up. They cannot sell them, be- 
cause they are entailed. They will not let them for pride's sake, but 
keep them empty, aired, and the grounds mown and dressed, at a 
cost of four or five thousand pounds a year. The spending is for a 
great part in servants, in many houses exceeding a hundred. 

Most of them are only chargeable with idleness, which, because 
it squanders such vast power of benefit, has the mischief of crime. 
"They might be little Providences on earth," said my friend, "and 
they are, for the most part, jockeys and fops." Campbell says, "Ac- 
quaintance with the nobiUty, I could never keep up. It requires a 
life of idleness, dressing, and attendance on their parties." I suppose, 
too, that a feeling of self-respect is driving cultivated men out of 
this society, as if the noble were slow to receive the lessons of the 
times, and had not learned to disguise his pride of place. A man of 
wit, who is also one of the celebrities of wealth and fashion, con- 
fessed to his friend that he could not enter their houses without 
being made to feel that they were great lords, and he a low plebeian. 
With the tribe of artistes, including the musical tribe, the patrician 
morgue keeps no terms, but excludes them. When Julia Grisi and 
Mario sang at the houses of the Duke of Wellington and other 
grandees, a cord was stretched between the singer and the company. 

When every noble was a soldier, they were carefully bred to great 
personal prowess. The education of a soldier is a simpler affair than 
that of an earl in the nineteenth century. And this was very seriously 
pursued; they were expert in every species of equitation, to the most 
dangerous practices, and this down to the accession of William of 
Orange. But graver men appear to have trained their sons for civil 
affairs. Elizabeth extended her thought to the future; and Sir Philip 
Sidney in his letter to his brother, and Milton and Evelyn, gave plain 
and hearty counsel. Already, too, the English noble and squire 
were preparing for the career of the country-gentleman, and his 
peaceable expense. They went from city to city, learning receipts 
to make perfumes, sweet powders, pomanders, antidotes, gathering 
seeds, gems, coins, and divers curiosities, preparing for a private life 
thereafter, in which they should take pleasure in these recreations. 



414 ENGLISH TRAITS 

All advantages given to absolve the young patrician from intellec- 
tual labor are of course mistaken. "In the university, noblemen are 
exempted from the public exercises for the degree, &c., by which 
they attain a degree called honorary. At the same time, the fees 
they have to pay for matriculation, and on all other occasions, are 
much higher." * Fuller records "the observation of foreigners, that 
Englishmen, by making their children gentlemen, before they are 
men, cause they are so seldom wise men." This cockering justifies 
Dr. Johnson's bitter apology for primogeniture, "that it makes but 
one fool in a family." 

The revolution in society has reached this class. The great powers 
of industrial art have no exclusion of name or blood. The tools 
of our time, namely, steam, ships, printing, money, and popular 
education, belong to those who can handle them: and their effect 
has been that advantages once confined to men of family are now 
open to the whole middle class. The road that grandeur levels for 
his coach, toil can travel in his cart. 

This is more manifest every day, but I think it is true throughout 
English history. English history, wisely read, is the vindication of 
the brain of that people. Here, at last, were climate and condition 
friendly to the working faculty. Who now will work and dare, shall 
rule. This is the charter, or the chartism, which fogs, and seas, and 
rains proclaimed, — that intellect and personal force should make the 
law; that industry and administrative talent should administer; that 
work should wear the crown. I know that not this, but something 
else, is pretended. The fiction with which the noble and the by- 
stander equally please themselves is that the former is of unbroken 
descent from the Norman, and so has never worked for eight 
hundred years. All the families are new, but the name is old, and 
they have made a covenant with their memories not to disturb it. 
But the analysis of the peerage and gentry shows the rapid decay 
and extinction of old families, the continual recruiting of these from 
new blood. The doors, though ostentatiously guarded, are really 
open, and hence the power of the bribe. All the barriers to rank 
only whet the thirst, and enhance the prize. "Now," said Nelson, 
when clearing for battle, "a peerage, or Westminster Abbey!" "I 

* Huber. History of English Universities. 



UNIVERSITIES 415 

have no illusion left," said Sydney Smith, "but the Archbishop of 
Canterbury." "The lawyers," said Burke, "are only birds of passage 
in this House of Commons," and then added, with a new figure, 
"they have their best bower anchor in the House of Lords." 

Another stride that has been taken appears in the perishing of 
heraldry. Whilst the privileges of nobility are passing to the middle 
class, the badge is discredited, and the titles of lordship are getting 
musty and cumbersome. I wonder that sensible men have not been 
already impatient of them. They belong, with wigs, powder, and 
scarlet coats, to an earlier age, and may be advantageously consigned, 
with paint and tattoo, to the dignitaries of Australia and Polynesia. 

A multitude of English, educated at the universities, bred into 
their society with manners, ability, and the gifts of fortune, are every 
day confronting the peers on a footing of equality, and outstripping 
them, as often, in the race of honor and influence. That cultivated 
class is large and ever enlarging. It is computed that, with tides and 
without, there are seventy thousand of these people coming and 
going in London, who make up what is called high society. They 
cannot shut their eyes to the fact that an untitled nobility possess all 
the power without the inconveniences that belong to rank, and the 
rich Englishman goes over the world at the present day, drawing 
more than all the advantages which the strongest of his kings could 
command. 



CHAPTER XII 

uNrvERsrriES 

Of British universities, Cambridge has the most illustrious names 
on its list. At the present day, too, it has the advantage of Oxford, 
counting in its alumni a greater number of distinguished scholars. 
I regret that I had but a single day wherein to see King's College 
Chapel, the beautiful lawns and gardens of the colleges, and a few 
of its gownsmen. ^ 

But I availed myself of some repeated invitations to Oxford, where 
I had introductions to Dr. Daubeny, Professor of Botany, and to 
the Regius Professor of Divinity, as well as to a valued friend, a 



4l6 ENGLISH TRAITS 

fellow of Oriel, and went thither on the last day of March, 1848. I 
was the guest of my friend in Oriel, was housed close upon that 
college, and I lived on college hospitalities. 

My new friends showed me their cloisters, the Bodleian Library, 
the Randolph Gallery, Merton Hall, and the rest. I saw several faith- 
ful high-minded young men, some of them in the mood of making 
sacrifices for peace of mind, — a topic, of course, on which I had no 
counsel to offer. Their affectionate and gregarious ways reminded 
me at once of the habits of our Cambridge men, though I imputed 
to these English an advantage in their secure and polished manners. 
The halls are rich with oaken wainscoting and ceiling. The pictures 
of the founders hang from the walls; the tables glitter with plate. 
A youth came forward to the upper table, and pronounced the an- 
cient form of grace before meals, which, I suppose, has been in use 
here for ages, Benedictus benedicat; benedicitur , benedicatur. 

It is a curious proof of the English use and wont, or of their good 
nature, that these young men are locked up every night at nine 
o'clock, and the porter at each hall is required to give the name of 
any belated student who is admitted after that hour. Still more 
descriptive is the fact that out of twelve hundred young men, com- 
prising the most spirited of the aristocracy, a duel has never occurred. 

Oxford is old, even in England, and conservative. Its foundations 
date from Alfred, and even from Arthur, if, as is alleged, the Pheryllt 
of the Druids had a seminary here. In the reign of Edward I., it is 
pretended, here were thirty thousand students; and nineteen most 
noble foundations were then established. Chaucer found it as firm 
as if it had always stood; and it is, in British story, rich with great 
names, the school of the island, and the link of England to the 
learned of Europe. Hither came Erasmus, with delight, in 1497. 
Albericus Gentilis, in 1580, was relieved and maintained by the uni- 
versity. Albert Alaskie, a noble Polonian, Prince of Sirad, who vis- 
ited England to admire the wisdom of Queen Elizabeth, was enter- 
tained with stage-plays in the Refectory of Christ Church, in 1583. 
Isaac Casaubon, coming from Henri Quatre of France, by invita- 
tion of James I., was admitted to Christ's College, in July, 1613. I 
saw the Ashmolean Museum, whither Elias Ashmole, in 1682, sent 
twelve cart-loads of rarities. Here indeed was the Olympia of all 



UNIVERSITIES 417 

Anthony Wood's and Aubrey's games and heroes, and every inch of 
ground has its lustre. For Wood's Athena Oxonienses, or calender 
of the writers of Oxford for two hundred years, is a lively record of 
English manners and merits, and as much a national monument as 
Purchas's Pilgrims or Hansard's Register. On every side, Oxford 
is redolent of age and authority. Its gates shut of themselves against 
modern innovation. It is still governed by the statutes of Archbishop 
Laud. The books in Merton Library are still chained to the wall. 
Here, on August 27, 1660, John Milton's Pro Populo Anglicano 
Defensio and Iconoclastes were committed to the flames. I saw the 
school-court or quadrangle, where, in 1683, the Convocation caused 
the Leviathan of Thomas Hobbes to be publicly burnt. I do not 
know whether this learned body have yet heard of the declaration 
of American Independence, or whether the Ptolemaic astronomy 
does not still hold its ground against the novelties of Copernicus. 

As many sons, almost so many benefactors. It is usual for a noble- 
man, or indeed for almost every wealthy student, on quitting college, 
to leave behind him some article of plate; and gifts of all values, 
from a hall, or a fellowship, or a library, down to a picture or a 
spoon, are continually accruing, in the course of a century. My 
friend Doctor J. gave me the following anecdote. In Sir Thomas 
Lawrence's collection at London, were the cartoons of Raphael and 
Michel Angelo. This inestimable prize was offered to Oxford Uni- 
versity for seven thousand pounds. The offer was accepted, and 
the committee charged with the affair had collected three thousand 
pounds, when among other friends, they called on Lord Eldon. 
Instead of a hundred pounds, he surprised them by putting down 
his name for three thousand pounds. They told him, they should 
now very easily raise the remainder. "No," he said, "your men 
have probably already contributed all they can spare; I can as well 
give the rest;" and he withdrew his cheque for three thousand, and 
wrote four thousand pounds. I saw the whole collection in April, 
1848. 

In the Bodleian Library, Dr. Bandinel showed me the manuscript 
Plato, of the date of a.d. 896, brought by Dr. Clarke from Egypt; a 
manuscript Virgil, of the same century; the first Bible printed at 
Mentz, (I believe in 1450) ; and a duphcate of the same, which had 



41 8 ENGLISH TRAITS 

been deficient in about twenty leaves at the end. But one day, being 
in Venice, he bought a room full of books and manuscripts, — every 
scrap and fragment, — ^for four thousand louis d'ors, and had the 
doors locked and sealed by the consul. On proceeding, afterwards, 
to examine his purchase, he found the twenty deficient pages of his 
Mentz Bible, in perfect order; brought them to Oxford, with the 
rest of his purchase, and placed them in the volume; but has too 
much awe for the Providence that appears in bibliography also, to 
suffer the reunited parts to be re-bound. The oldest building here 
is two hundred years younger than the frail manuscript brought by 
Dr. Clarke from Egypt. No candle or fire is ever lighted in the 
Bodleian. Its catalogue is the standard catalogue on the desk of 
every library in Oxford. In each several college, they underscore in 
red ink on this catalogue the titles of books contained in the library 
of that college, — the theory being that the Bodleian has all books. 
This rich library spent during the last year (1847) for the purchase 
of books ^^1668. 

The logical English train a scholar as they train an engineer. 
Oxford is a Greek factory, as Wilton mills weave carpet, and Shef- 
field grinds steel. They know the use of a tutor, as they know the 
use of a horse; and they draw the greatest amount of benefit out of 
both. The reading men are kept by hard walking, hard riding, and 
measured eating and drinking, at the top of their condition, and 
two days before the examination, do no work, but lounge, ride, or 
run, to be fresh on the college doomsday. Seven years' residence is 
the theoretic period for a master's degree. In point of fact, it has 
long been three years' residence, and four years more of standing. 
This "three years" is about twenty-one months in all.^ 

"The whole expense," says Professor Sewel, "of ordinary college 
tuition at Oxford is about sixteen guineas a year." But this plausible 
statement may deceive a reader unacquainted with the fact that the 
principal teaching relied on is private tuition. And the expenses of 
private tuition are reckoned at from ^50 to /70 a year, or $1000 
for the whole course of three years and a half. At Cambridge $750 
a year is economical, and $1500 not extravagant.^ 

The number of students and of residents, the dignity of the author- 
' Huber, ii, p. 304. ^BfJsted: Five Years at an English University. 



UNIVERSITIES 419 

ities, the value of the foundations, the history and the architecture, 
the known sympathy of entire Britain in what is done there, justify 
a dedication to study in the undergraduate, such as cannot easily 
be in America, where his college is half suspected by the Freshman 
to be insignificant in the scale beside trade and politics. Oxford is 
a little aristocracy in itself, numerous and dignified enough to rank 
with other estates in the realm; and where fame and secular pro- 
motion are to be had for study, and in a direction which has the 
unanimous respect of all cultivated nations. 

This aristocracy, of course, repairs its own losses; fills places, as 
they fall vacant, from the body of students. The number of fellow- 
ships at Oxford is 540, averaging ;^200 a year, with lodging and diet 
at the college. If a young American, loving learning, and hindered 
by poverty, were offered a home, a table, the walks, and the library, 
in one of these academical palaces, and a thousand dollars a year 
as long as he chose to remain a bachelor, he would dance for joy. 
Yet these young men thus happily placed, and paid to read, are 
impatient of their few checks, and many of them preparing to resign 
their fellowships. They shuddered at the prospect of dying a Fellow, 
and they pointed out to me a paralytic old man, who was assisted 
into the hall. As the number of undergraduates at Oxford is only 
about 1200 or 1300, and many of these are never competitors, the 
chance of a fellowship is very great. The income of the nineteen 
colleges is conjectured at ;ri5o,ooo a year. 

The effect of this drill is the radical knowledge of Greek and 
Latin, and of mathematics, and the solidity and taste of English 
criticism. Whatever luck there may be in this or that award, an 
Eton captain can write Latin longs and shorts, can turn the Court- 
Guide into hexameters, and it is certain that a Senior Classic can 
quote correctly from the Corpus Poetarum, and is critically learned 
in all the humanities. Greek erudition exists on the Isis and Cam, 
whether the Maud man or the Brazen Nose man be properly ranked 
or not; the atmosphere is loaded with Greek learning; the whole 
river has reached a certain height, and kills all that growth of weeds 
which this Castahan water kills. The English nature takes culture 
kindly. So Milton thought. It refines the Norseman. Access to 
the Greek mind Hfts his standard of taste. He has enough to think 



420 ENGLISH TRAITS 

of, and, unless of an impulsive nature, is indisposed from writing 
or speaking, by the fulness of his mind, and the new severity of 
his taste. The great silent crowd of thorough-bred Grecians always 
known to be around him, the English writer cannot ignore. They 
prune his orations, and point his pen. Hence, the style and tone of 
English journalism. The men have learned accuracy and compre- 
hension, logic, and pace, or speed of working. They have bottom, 
endurance, wind. When born with good constitutions, they make 
those eupeptic studying-mills, the cast-iron men, the dura ilia, whose 
powers of performance compare with ours, as the steam-hammer 
with the music-box; — Cokes, Mansfields, Seldens, and Bentleys, and 
when it happens that a superior brain puts a rider on this admirable 
horse, we obtain those masters of the world who combine the highest 
energy in affairs, with a supreme culture. 

It is contended by those who have been bred at Eton, Harrow, 
Rugby, and Westminster, that the public sentiment within each of 
those schools is high-toned and manly; that in their playgrounds, 
courage is universally admired, meanness despised, manly feehngs 
and generous conduct are encouraged: that an unwritten code of 
honor deals to the spoiled child of rank, and to the child of upstart 
wealth, an even-handed justice, purges their nonsense out of both, 
and does all that can be done to make them gentlemen. 

Again, at the universities, it is urged that all goes to form what 
England values as the flower of its national life, — a well-educated 
gentleman. The German Huber, in describing to his countrymen 
the attributes of an English gentleman, frankly admits that, "in 
Germany, we have nothing of the kind. A gentleman must possess 
a political character, an independent and public position, or, at least, 
the right of assuming it. He must have average opulence, either of 
his own, or in his family. He should also have bodily activity and 
strength, unattainable by our sedentary life in public offices. The 
race of English gentlemen presents an appearance of manly vigor 
and form, not elsewhere to be found among an equal number of 
persons. No other nation produces the stock. And, in England, it 
has deteriorated. The university is a decided presumption in any 
man's favor. And so eminent are the members that a glance at 
the calendars will show that in all the world one cannot be in better 



UNIVERSITIES 421 

company than on the books of one of the larger Oxford or Cam- 
bridge colleges." ' 

These seminaries are finishing schools for the upper classes, and 
not for the poor. The useful is exploded. The definition of a 
public school is "a school which excludes all that could fit a man 
for standing behind a counter." * 

No doubt, the foundations have been perverted. Oxford, which 
equals in wealth several of the smaller European states, shuts up 
the lectureships which were made "pubUc for all men thereunto to 
have concourse"; mis-spends the revenues bestowed for such youths 
"as should be most meet for towardness, poverty, and painfulness"; 
there is gross favoritism; many chairs and many fellowships are 
made beds of ease; and 'tis likely that the university will know how 
to resist and make inoperative the terrors of parliamentary inquiry; 
no doubt, their learning is grown obsolete; — but Oxford also has its 
merits, and I found here also proof of the national fidelity and thor- 
oughness. Such knowledge as they prize they possess and impart. 
Whether in course or by indirection, whether by a cramming tutor 
or by examiners with prizes and foundation scholarships, education 
according to the English notion of it is arrived at. I looked over the 
Examination Papers of the year 1848, for the various scholarships 
and fellowships, the Lusby, the Hertford, the Dean-Ireland, and the 
University (copies of which were kindly given me by a Greek pro- 
fessor), containing the tasks which many competitors had victori- 
ously performed, and I believed they would prove too severe tests 
for the candidates for a Bachelor's degree in Yale or Harvard. And, 
in general, here was proof of a more searching study in the appointed 
directions, and the knowledge pretended to be conveyed was con- 
veyed. Oxford sends out yearly twenty or thirty very able men, and 
three or four hundred well-educated men. 

The diet and rough exercise secure a certain amount of old Norse 
power. A fop will fight, and, in exigent circumstances, will play 
the manly part. In seeing these youths, I believed I saw already an 
advantage in vigor and color and general habit, over their con- 
temporaries in American colleges. No doubt much of the power 

3 Huber: History of the English Universities. Newman's translation. 
*See Bristed: Five Years in an English University. New York, 1852. 



422 ENGLISH TRAITS 

and brilliancy of the reading-men is merely constitutional or hy- 
gienic. With a hardier habit and resolute gymnastics, with five miles 
more walking, or five ounces less eating, or with a saddle and gallop 
of twenty miles a day, with skating and rowing-matches, the Amer- 
ican would arrive at as robust exegesis and cheery and hilarious tone. 
I should readily concede these advantages, which it would be easy 
to acquire, if I did not find also that they read better than we, and 
write better. 

English wealth, falling on their school and university training, 
makes a systematic reading of the best authors, and to the end of a 
knowledge how the things whereof they treat really stand: whilst 
pamphleteer or journalist reading for an argument for a party, or 
reading to write, or, at all events, for some by-end imposed on them, 
must read meanly and fragmentarily. Charles I. said that he under- 
stood English law as well as a gentleman ought to understand it. 

Then they have access to books; the rich libraries collected at 
every one of many thousands of houses, give an advantage not to 
be attained by a youth in this country, when one thinks how much 
more and better may be learned by a scholar who, immediately on 
hearing of a book, can consult it, than by one who is on the quest 
for years, and reads inferior books because he cannot find the best. 

Again, the great number of cultivated men keep each other up to 
a high standard. The habit of meeting well-read and knowing men 
teaches the art of omission and selection. 

Universities are, of course, hostile to geniuses, which seeing and 
using ways of their own, discredit the routine: as churches and 
monasteries persecute youthful saints. Yet we all send our sons to 
college, and, though he be a genius, he must take his chance. The 
university must be retrospective. The gale that gives direction to 
the vanes on all its towers blows out of antiquity. Oxford is a library, 
and the professors must be librarians. And I should as soon think 
of quarrelling with the janitor for not magnifying his office by hostile 
sallies into the street like the Governor of Kertch or Kinburn, as of 
quarrelling with the professors for not admiring the young neologists 
who pluck the beards of Euclid and Aristode, or for attempting 
themselves to fill their vacant shelves as original writers. 

It is easy to carp at college, and the college, if we will wait for it. 



RELIGION 423 

will have its own turn. Genius exists there also, but will not answer 
a call of a committee of the House of Commons. It is rare, pre- 
carious, eccentric, and darkHng. England is the land of mixture and 
surprise, and when you have setded it that the universities are mori- 
bund, out comes a poetic influence from the heart of Oxford, to 
mould the opinions of cities, to build their houses as simply as birds 
their nests, to give veracity to art, and charm mankind, as an appeal 
to moral order always must. But besides this restorative genius, the 
best poetry of England of this age, in the old forms, comes from two 
graduates of Cambridge. 



CHAPTER XIII 



No people, at the present day, can be explained by their national 
rehgion. They do not feel responsible for it; it Hes far outside of 
them. Their loyalty to truth, and their labor and expenditure rest 
on real foundations, and not on a national church. An English life, 
it is evident, does not grow out of the Athanasian creed, or the 
Articles, or the Eucharist. It is with religion as with marriage. A 
youth marries in haste; afterward, when his mind is opened to the 
reason of the conduct of life, he is asked what he thinks of the 
institution of marriage, and of the right relations of the sexes? "I 
should have much to say," he might reply, "if the question were 
open, but I have a wife and children, and all question is closed for 
me." In the barbarous days of a nation, some cultus is formed or 
imported; altars are built, tithes are paid, priests ordained. The 
education and expenditure of the country take that direction, and 
when wealth, refinement, great men, and ties to the world super- 
vene, its prudent men say, why fight against Fate, or lift these 
absurdities which are now mountainous? Better find some niche 
or crevice in this mountain of stone which religious ages have quar- 
ried and carved, wherein to bestow yourself, than attempt anything 
ridiculously and dangerously above your strength, like removing it. 

In seeing old castles and cathedrals, I sometimes say, as to-day, in 
front of Dundee Church tower, which is eight hundred years old. 



424 ENGLISH TRAITS 

"This was built by another and a better race than any that now look 
on it." And, plainly, there has been great power of sentiment at 
work in this island, of which these buildings are the proofs: as 
volcanic basalts show the work of fire which has been extinguished 
for ages. England felt the full heat of the Christianity which fer- 
mented Europe, and drew, like the chemistry of fire, a firm line 
between barbarism and culture. The power of the religious senti- 
ment put an end to human sacrifices, checked appetite, inspired the 
crusades, inspired resistance to tyrants, inspired self-respect, set 
bounds to serfdom and slavery, founded liberty, created the religious 
architecture, — ^York, Newstead, Westminster, Fountains Abbey, 
Ripon, Beverly, and Dundee, — works to which the key is lost, with 
the sentiment which created them; inspired the English Bible, the 
liturgy, the monkish histories, the chronicle of Richard of Devizes. 
The priest translated the Vulgate, and translated the sanctities of 
old hagiology into English virtues on English ground. It was a 
certain affirmative or aggressive state of the Caucasian races. Man 
awoke, refreshed by the sleep of ages. The violence of the northern 
savages exasperated Christianity into power. It lived by the love of 
the people. Bishop Wilfrid manumitted two hundred and fifty serfs, 
whom he found attached to the soil. The clergy obtained respite 
from labor for the boor on the Sabbath, and on church festivals. 
"The lord who compelled his boor to labor between sunset on Satur- 
day and sunset on Sunday, forfeited him altogether." The priest 
came out of the people, and sympathized with his class. The church 
was the mediator, check, and democratic principle in Europe. 
Latimer, WicHffe, Arundel, Cobham, Antony Parsons, Sir Harry 
Vane, George Fox, Penn, Bunyan, are the democrats, as well as 
the saints, of their times. The Catholic church, thrown on this toil- 
ing, serious people, has made in fourteen centuries a massive system, 
close fitted to the manners and genius of the country, at once do- 
mestical and stately. In the long time, it has blended with everything 
in heaven above and the earth beneath. It moves through a zodiac 
of feasts and fasts, names every day of the year, every town and 
market and headland and monument, and has coupled itself with 
the almanac, that no court can be held, no field ploughed, no horse 
shod, without some leave from the church. All maxims of prudence, 



RELIGION 425 

or shop, or farm, are fixed and dated by the church. Hence, its 
strength in the agricultural districts. The distribution of land into 
parishes enforces a church sanction to every civil privilege; and the 
gradation of the clergy, — prelates for the rich, and curates for the 
poor, — vi'ith the fact that a classical education has been secured to 
the clergyman, makes them "the link which unites the sequestered 
peasantry with the intellectual advancement of the age." ^ 

The Enghsh church has many certificates to show of humble 
effective service in humanizing the people, in cheering and refining 
men, feeding, heaUng, and educating. It has the seal of martyrs and 
confessors; the noblest books; a sublime architecture; a ritual marked 
by the same secular merits, nothing cheap or purchasable. 

From this slow-grown church important reactions proceed; much 
for culture, much for giving a direction to the nation's affection and 
will to-day. The carved and pictured chapel, — its entire surface ani- 
mated with image and emblem, — made the parish-church a sort of 
book and Bible to the people's eye. 

Then, when the Saxon instinct had secured a service in the ver- 
nacular tongue, it was the tutor and university of the people. In 
York minster, on the day of the enthronization of the new arch- 
bishop, I heard the service of evening prayer read and chanted in 
the choir. It was strange to hear the pretty pastoral of the betrothal 
of Rebecca and Isaac, in the morning of the world, read with cir- 
cumstantiality in York minster, on the 13th January, 1848, to the 
decorous English audience, just fresh from the Times newspaper 
and their wine; and listening with all the devotion of national pride. 
That was binding old and new to some purpose. The reverence for 
the Scriptures is an element of civilization, for thus has the history 
of the world been preserved, and is preserved. Here in England 
every day a chapter of Genesis, and a leader in the Times. 

Another part of the same service on this occasion was not insig- 
nificant. Handel's coronation anthem, God save the King, was 
played by Dr. Camidge on the organ, with sublime effect. The 
minster and the music were made for each other. It was a hint of 
the part the church plays as a political engine. From his infancy, 
every Englishman is accustomed to hear daily prayers for the Queen, 

' Wordsworth. 



426 ENGLISH TRAITS 

for the royal family and the Parliament, by name; and this lifelong 
consecration of these personages cannot be without influence on his 
opinions. 

The universities, also, are parcel of the ecclesiastical system, and 
their first design is to form the clergy. Thus the clergy for a thousand 
years have been the scholars of the nation. 

The national temperament deeply enjoys the unbroken order and 
tradition of its church; the liturgy, ceremony, architecture; the sober 
grace, the good company, the connection with the throne, and with 
history, which adorn it. And whilst it endears itself thus to men of 
more taste than activity, the stability of the English nation is pas- 
sionately enlisted to its support, from its inextricable connection with 
the cause of public order, with politics, and with the funds. 

Good churches are not built by bad men; at least, there must be 
probity and enthusiasm somewhere in the society. These minsters 
were neither built nor filled by atheists. No church has had more 
learned, industrious, or devoted men; plenty of "clerks and bishops, 
who, out of their gowns, would turn their backs on no man." ^ Their 
architecture still glows with faith in immortality. Heats and genial 
periods arrive in history, or shall we say, plentitudes of Divine Pres- 
ence, by which high tides are caused in the human spirit, and great 
virtues and talents appear, as in the eleventh, twelfth, thirteenth, 
and again in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, when the 
nation was full of genius and piety. 

But the age of the Wiclifles, Cobhams, Arundels, Beckets; of the 
Latimers, Mores, Cranmers; of the Taylors, Leightons, Herberts; 
of the Sherlocks, and Butlers, is gone. Silent revolutions in opinion 
have made it impossible that men like these should return, or find 
a place in their once sacred stalls. The spirit that dwelt in this 
church has glided away to animate other activities; and they who 
come to the old shrines find apes and players rustling the old gar- 
ments. 

The religion of England is part of good-breeding. When you see 
on the continent the well-dressed Englishman come into his ambassa- 
dor's chapel, and put his face for silent prayer into his smooth- 

2 Fuller. 



RELIGION 427 

brushed hat, one cannot help feeUng how much national pride prays 
with him, and the reUgion of a gendeman. So far is he from attach- 
ing any meaning to the words, that he beUeves himself to have done 
almost the generous thing, and that it is very condescending in him 
to pray to God. A great duke said, on the occasion of a victory, in 
the House of Lords, that he thought the Almighty God had not been 
well used by them, and that it would become their magnanimity, 
after so great successes, to take order that a proper acknowledgment 
be made. It is the church of the gentry; but it is not the church of 
the poor. The operatives do not own it, and gendemen lately testified 
in the House of Commons that in their lives they never saw a poor 
man in a ragged coat inside a church. 

The torpidity on the side of religion of the vigorous English 
understanding shows how much wit and folly can agree in one 
brain. Their reUgion is a quotation; their church is a doll; and any 
examination is interdicted with screams of terror. In good com- 
pany, you expect them to laugh at the fanaticism of the vulgar; but 
they do not: they are the vulgar. 

The Enghsh, in common perhaps with Christendom in the nine- 
teenth century, do not respect power, but only performance; value 
ideas only for an economic result. Wellington esteems a saint only 
as far as he can be an army chaplain: — "Mr. BriscoU, by his admir- 
able conduct and good sense, got the better of Methodism, which 
had appeared among the soldiers, and once among the officers." 
They value a philosopher as they value an apothecary who brings 
bark or a drench; and inspiration is only some blowpipe, or a finer 
mechanical aid. 

I suspect that there is in an Englishman's brain a valve that can 
be closed at pleasure, as an engineer shuts off steam. The most 
sensible and well-informed men possess the power of thinking just 
so far as the bishop in religious matters, and as the chancellor of 
the exchequer in politics. They talk with courage and logic, and 
show you magnificent results, but the same men who have brought 
free trade or geology to their present standing, look grave and lofty, 
and shut down their valve, as soon as the conversation approaches 
the English church. After that, you talk with a box-turtle. 

The action of the university, both in what is taught, and in the 



428 ENGLISH TRAITS 

spirit of the place, is directed more on producing an English gentle- 
man, than a saint or a psychologist. It ripens a bishop, and extrudes 
a philosopher. I do not know that there is more cabalism in the 
Anglican, than in other churches, but the Anglican clergy are identi- 
fied with the aristocracy. They say, here, that, if you talk with a 
clergyman, you are sure to find him well-bred, informed and candid. 
He entertains your thought or your project with sympathy and 
praise. But if a second clergyman come in, the sympathy is at an 
end: two together are inaccessible to your thought, and, whenever 
it comes to action, the clergyman invariably sides with his church. 

The Anglican church is marked by the grace and good sense of 
its forms, by the manly grace of its clergy. The gospel it preaches is, 
"By taste are ye saved." It keeps the old structures in repair, spends 
a world of money in music and building; and in buying Pugin, and 
architectural literature. It has a general good name for amenity and 
mildness. It is not in ordinary a persecuting church; it is not inquisi- 
torial, not even inquisitive, is perfectly well-bred, and can shut its 
eyes on all proper occasions. If you let it alone, it will let you alone. 
But its instinct is hostile to all change in politics, literature, or social 
arts. The church has not been the founder of the London University, 
of the Mechanics' Institutes, of the Free School, or whatever aims 
at diiTusion of knowledge. The Platonists of Oxford are as bitter 
against this heresy, as Thomas Taylor. 

The doctrine of the Old Testament is the religion of England. 
The first leaf of the New Testament it does not open. It believes 
in a Providence which does not treat with levity a pound sterling. 
They are neither Transcendentalists nor Christians. They put up no 
Socratic prayer, much less any saintly prayer for the queen's mind; 
ask neither for light nor right, but say bluntly, "Grant her in health 
and wealth long to Hve." And one traces this Jewish prayer in all 
EngHsh private history, from the prayers of King Richard, in Rich- 
ard of Devizes' Chronicle, to those in the diaries of Sir Samuel 
Romilly, and of Haydon the painter. "Abroad with my wife," writes 
Pepys piously, "the first time that ever I rode in my own coach; 
which do make my heart rejoice and praise God, and pray him to 
bless it to me, and continue it." The bill for the naturalization of 
the Jews (in 1753) was resisted by petitions from all parts of the 



RELIGION 429 

kingdom, and by petition from the city of London, reprobating this 
bill, as, "tending extremely to the dishonor of the Christian religion, 
and extremely injurious to the interests and commerce of the king- 
dom in general, and of the city of London in particular." 

But they have not been able to congeal humanity by act of Parlia- 
ment. "The heavens journey still and sojourn not," and arts, wars, 
discoveries, and opinion go onward at their own pace. The new 
age has new desires, new enemies, new trades, new charities, and 
reads the Scriptures with new eyes. The chatter of French politics, 
the steam-whistle, the hum of the mill, and the noise of embarking 
emigrants had quite put most of the old legends out of mind; so 
that when you came to read the liturgy to a modern congregation, 
it was almost absurd in its unfitness, and suggested a masquerade 
of old costumes. 

No chemist has prospered in the attempt to crystalUze a religion. 
It is endogenous, like the skin, and other vital organs. A new state- 
ment every day. The prophet and apostle knew this, and the non- 
conformist confutes the conformists, by quoting the texts they must 
allow. It is the condition of a religion, to require religion for its 
expositor. Prophet and apostle can only be rightly understood by 
prophet and aposde. The statesman knows that the religious element 
will not fail, any more than the supply of fibrine and chyle; but it 
is in its nature constructive, and will organize such a church as it 
wants. The wise legislator will spend on temples, schools, hbraries, 
colleges, but will shun the enriching of priests. If, in any manner, 
he can leave the election and paying of the priest to the people, he 
will do well. Like the Quakers, he may resist the separation of a 
class of priests, and create opportunity and expectation in the society, 
to run to meet natural endowment, in this kind. But, when wealth 
accrues to chaplaincy, a bishopric, or rectorship, it requires moneyed 
men for its stewards, who will give it another direction than to the 
mystics of their day. Of course, money will do after its kind, and, 
will steadily work to unspiritualize and unchurch the people to 
whom it was bequeathed. The class certain to be excluded from all 
preferment are the religious, — and driven to other churches; — which 
is nature's vis medicatrix. 

The curates are ill paid, and the prelates are overpaid. This abuse 



430 ENGLISH TRAITS 

draws into the church the children of the nobiUty, and other unfit 
persons, who have a taste for expense. Thus a bishop is only a 
surpliced merchant. Through his lawn, I can see the bright buttons 
of the shopman's coat glitter. A wealth like that of Durham makes 
almost a premium on felony. Brougham, in a speech in the House 
of Commons on the Irish elective franchise, said, "How will the 
reverend bishops of the other house be able to express their due 
abhorrence of the crime of perjury, who solemnly declare in the 
presence of God, that when they are called upon to accept a living, 
perhaps of ;(^4000 a year, at that very instant, they are moved by 
the Holy Ghost to accept the office and administration thereof, and 
for no other reason whatever?" The modes of initiation are more 
damaging than custom-house oaths. The Bishop is elected by the 
Dean and Prebends of the cathedral. The Queen sends these gentle- 
men a conge d'elire, or leave to elect; but also sends them the name 
of the person whom they are to elect. They go into the cathedral, 
chant and pray, and beseech the Holy Ghost to assist them in their 
choice; and, after these invocations, invariably find that the dictates 
of the Holy Ghost agree with the recommendations of the Queen. 

But you must pay for conformity. All goes well as long as you 
run with conformists. But you, who are honest men in other par- 
ticulars, know that there is alive somewhere a man whose honesty 
reaches to this point also, that he shall not kneel to false gods, and, 
on the day when you meet him, you sink into the class of counter- 
feits. Besides, this succumbing has grave penalties. If you take in 
a lie, you must take in all that belongs to it. England accepts this 
ornamented national church, and it glazes the eyes, bloats the flesh, 
gives the voice a stertorous clang, and clouds the understanding of 
the receivers. 

The English church, undermined by German criticism, had noth- 
ing left but tradition, and was led logically back to Romanism. But 
that was an element which only hot heads could breathe: in view 
of the educated class, generally, it was not a fact to front the sun; 
and the alienation of such men from the church became complete. 

Nature, to be sure, had her remedy. Religious persons are driven 
out of the Established Church into sects, which instantly rise to 
credit, and hold the Establishment in check. Nature has sharper 



RELIGION 43 1 

remedies, also. The English, abhorring change in all things, abhor- 
ring it most in matters of religion, cling to the last rag of form, and 
are dreadfully given to cant. The EngUsh (and I wish it were 
confined to them, but 'tis a taint in the Anglo-Saxon blood in both 
hemispheres), the English and the Americans cant beyond all other 
nations. The French relinquish all that industry to them. What is 
so odious as the polite bows to God, in our books and newspapers? 
The popular press is flagitious in the exact measure of its sancti- 
mony, and the religion of the day is a theatrical Sinai, where the 
thunders are supplied by the property-man. The fanaticism and 
hypocrisy create satire. Punch finds an inexhaustible material. Dick- 
ens writes novels on Exeter-Hall humanity. Thackeray exposes the 
heartless high life. Nature revenges herself more summarily by the 
heathenism of the lower classes. Lord Shaftesbury calls the poor 
thieves together, and reads sermons to them, and they call it "gas." 
George Borrow summons the Gypsies to hear his discourse on the 
Hebrews in Egypt, and reads to them the Apostles' Creed in Rom- 
any. "When I had concluded," he says, "I looked around me. The 
features of the assembly were twisted, and the eyes of all turned 
upon me with a frightful squint: not an individual present but 
squinted; the genteel Pepa, the good-humored Chicharona, the Cos- 
dami, all squinted: the Gypsy jockey squinted worst of all." 

The church at this moment is much to be pitied. She has nothing 
left but possession. If a bishop meets an intelligent gentleman, and 
reads fatal interrogations in his eyes, he has no resource but to take 
wine with him. False position introduces cant, perjury, simony, and 
ever a lower class of mind and character into the clergy : and, when 
the hierarchy is afraid of science and education, afraid of piety, 
afraid of tradition, and afraid of theology, there is nothing left but 
to quit a church which is no longer one. 

But the religion of England, — is it the Established Church? no; 
is it the sects? no; they are only perpetuations of some private man's 
dissent, and are to the Established Church as cabs are to a coach, 
cheaper and more convenient, but really the same thing. Where 
dwells the reHgion? Tell me first where dwells electricity, or motion, 
or thought, or gesture. They do not dwell or stay at all. Electricity 
cannot be made fast, mortared up and ended, like London Monu- 



432 ENGLISH TRAITS 

ment, or the Tower, so that you shall know where to find it, and 
keep it fixed, as the EngUsh do with their things, forevermore; it 
is passing, glancing, gesticular; it is a traveller, a newness, a surprise, 
a secret, which perplexes them, and puts them out. Yet, if religion 
be the doing of all good, and for its sake the suffering of all evil, 
souffrtr de tout le monde et ne faire souffrir personne, that divine 
secret has existed in England from the days of Alfred to those of 
Romilly, of Clarkson, and of Florence Nightingale, and in thousands 
who have no fame. 



CHAPTER XIV 

LITERATURE 

A STRONG common-sense, which it is not easy to unseat or disturb, 
marks the English mind for a thousand years: a rude strength newly 
applied to thought, as of sailors and soldiers who had lately learned 
to read. They have no fancy, and never are surprised into a covert or 
witty word, such as pleased the Athenians and Italians, and was 
convertible into a fable not long after; but they delight in strong 
earthly expression, not mistakable, coarsely true to the human 
body, and, though spoken among princes, equally fit and welcome to 
the mob. This homeUness, veracity, and plain style appear in the 
earliest extant works, and in the latest. It imports into songs and 
ballads the smell of the earth, the breath of cattle, and, like a Dutch 
painter, seeks a household charm, though by pails and pans. They 
ask their constitutional utility in verse. The kail and herrings are 
never out of sight. The poet nimbly recovers himself from every 
sally of the imagination. The English muse loves the farmyard, the 
lane, and market. She says, with De Stael, "I tramp in the mire with 
wooden shoes, whenever they would force me into the clouds." 
For, the Englishman has accurate perceptions; takes hold of things 
by the right end, and there is no slipperiness in his grasp. He loves 
the axe, the spade, the oar, the gun, the steam-pipe: he has built the 
engine he uses. He is materialist, economical, mercantile. He must 
be treated with sincerity and reality, with muffins, and not the 
promise of muffins; and prefers his hot chop, with perfect security 



LITERATURE 433 

and convenience in the eating of it, to the chances of the amplest and 
Frenchiest bill of fare, engraved on embossed paper. When he is 
intellectual, and a poet or a philosopher, he carries the same hard 
truth and the same keen machinery into the mental sphere. His 
mind must stand on a fact. He will not be baffled, or catch at clouds, 
but the mind must have a symbol palpable and resisting. What he 
relishes in Dante is the vice-like tenacity with which he holds a 
mental image before the eyes, as if it were a scutcheon painted on a 
shield. Byron "liked something craggy to break his mind upon." 
A taste for plain strong speech, what is called a biblical style, marks 
the English. It is in Alfred, and the Saxon Chronicle, and in the 
Sagas of the Northmen. Latimer was homely. Hobbes was perfect 
in the "noble vulgar speech." Donne, Bunyan, Milton, Taylor, 
Evelyn, Pepys, Hooker, Cotton, and the translators wrote it. How 
realistic or materialistic in treatment of his subject is Swift. He 
describes his fictitious persons, as if for the police. Defoe has no 
insecurity or choice. Hudibras has the same hard mentality, — keep- 
ing the truth at once to the senses, and to the intellect. 

It is not less seen in poetry. Chaucer's hard painting of his Canter- 
bury pilgrims satisfies the senses. Shakspeare, Spenser, and Milton, 
in their loftiest ascents, have this national grip and exactitude of 
mind. This mental materialism makes the value of English trans- 
cendental genius; in these writers, and in Herbert, Henry More, 
Donne, and Sir Thomas Browne. The Saxon materialism and nar- 
rowness, exalted into the sphere of intellect, makes the very genius 
of Shakspeare and Milton. When it reaches the pure element, it 
treads the clouds as securely as the adamant. Even in its elevations, 
materialistic, its poetry is common-sense inspired; or iron raised to 
white heat. 

The marriage of the two qualities is in their speech. It is a tacit 
rule of the language to make the frame or skeleton of Saxon words, 
and, when elevation or ornament is sought, to interweave Roman;, 
but sparingly; nor is a sentence made of Roman words alone, with- 
out loss of strength. The children and laborers use the Saxon 
unmixed. The Latin unmixed is abandoned to the colleges and 
Parliament. Mixture is a secret of the English island; and, in their 
dialect, the male principle is the Saxon; the female, the Latin; and 



434 ENGLISH TRAITS 

they are combined in every discourse. A good writer, if he has 
indulged in a Roman roundness, makes haste to chasten and nerve 
his period by English monosyllables. 

When the Gothic nations came into Europe, they found it lighted 
with the sun and moon of Hebrew and of Greek genius. The tablets 
of their brain, long kept in the dark, were finely sensible to the 
double glory. To the images from this twin source (of Christianity 
and art), the mind became fruitful as by the incubation of the Holy 
Ghost. The English mind flowered in every faculty. The common- 
sense was surprised and inspired. For two centuries, England was 
philosophic, religious, poetic. The mental furniture seemed of larger 
scale; the memory capacious like the storehouse of the rains; the 
ardor and endurance of study; the boldness and facility of their 
mental construction; their fancy, and imagination, and easy spanning 
of vast distances of thought; the enterprise or accosting of new sub- 
jects; and, generally, the easy exertion of power, astonish, like the 
legendary feats of Guy of Warwick. The union of Saxon precision 
and Oriental soaring, of which Shakspeare is the perfect example, is 
shared in less degree by the writers of two centuries. I find not only 
the great masters out of all rivalry and reach, but the whole writing 
of the time charged with a mascuHne force and freedom. 

There is a hygienic simpleness, rough vigor, and closeness to the 
matter in hand, even in the second and third class of writers; and, I 
think, in the common style of the people, as one finds it in the 
citation of wills, letters, and public documents, in proverbs, and 
forms of speech. The more hearty and sturdy expression may indi- 
cate that the savageness of the Norseman was not all gone. Their 
dynamic brains hurled off their words, as the revolving stone hurls 
off scraps of grit. I could cite from the seventeenth century sentences 
and phrases of edge not to be matched in the nineteenth. Their 
poets by simple force of mind equalized themselves with the accumu- 
lated science of ours. The country gentlemen had a posset or drink 
they called October; and the poets, as if by this hint, knew how to 
distil the whole season into their autumnal verses: and, as nature, 
to pique the more, sometimes works up deformities into beauty, in 
some rare Aspasia, or Cleopatra; and, as the Greek art wrought 
many a vase or column, in which too long, or too lithe, or nodes, or 



UTERATURE 435 

pits and flaws, are made a beauty o£; so these were so quick and 
vital, that they could charm and enrich by mean and vulgar objects. 

A man must think that age well taught and thoughtful, by which 
masques and poems, like those of Ben Jonson, full of heroic senti- 
ment in a manly style, were received with favor. The unique fact in 
literary history, the unsurprised reception of Shakspeare; — the recep- 
tion proved by his making his fortune; and the apathy proved by 
the absence of all contemporary panegyric, — seems to demonstrate an 
elevation in the mind of the people. Judge of the splendor of a 
nation, by the insignificance of great individuals in it. The manner 
in which they learned Greek and Latin, before our modern facilities 
were yet ready, without dictionaries, grammars, or indexes, by 
lectures of a professor, followed by their own searchings, — required 
a more robust memory, and cooperation of all the faculties; and 
their scholars, Camden, Usher, Selden, Mede, Gataker, Hooker, 
Taylor, Burton, Bendey, Brian Walton, acquired the soUdity and 
method of engineers. 

The influence of Plato tinges the British genius. Their minds 
loved analogy; were cognizant of resemblances, and cHmbers on the 
staircase of unity. 'Tis a very old strife between those who elect to 
see identity, and those who elect to see discrepances; and it renews 
itself in Britain. The poets, of course, are of one part; the men of the 
world, of the other. But Britain had many disciples of Plato; — More, 
Hooker, Bacon, Sidney, Lord Brooke, Herbert, Browne, Donne, 
Spenser, Chapman, Milton, Crashaw, Norris, Cudworth, Berkeley, 
Jeremy Taylor. 

Lord Bacon has the EngHsh duality. His centuries of observations, 
on useful science, and his experiments, I suppose, were worth noth- 
ing. One hint of Franklin, or Watt, or Dalton, or Davy, or any one 
who had a talent for experiment, was worth all his lifetime of 
exquisite trifles. But he drinks of a diviner stream, and marks the 
influx of idealism into England. Where that goes, is poetry, health, 
and progress. The rules of its genesis or its diffusion are not known. 
That knowledge, if we had it, would supersede all that we call 
science of the mind. It seems an affair of race, or of meta-chemistry; 
— the vital point being, — how far the sense of unity, or instinct of 
seeking resemblances, predominated. For, wherever the mind takes 



436 ENGLISH TRAITS 

a step, it is, to put itself at one with a larger class, discerned beyond 
the lesser class with which it has been conversant. Hence all poetry 
and all affirmative action come. 

Bacon, in the structure of his mind, held of the analogists, of the 
idealists, or (as we popularly say, naming from the best example) 
Platonists. Whoever discredits analogy, and requires heaps of facts, 
before any theories can be attempted, has no poetic power, and noth- 
ing original or beautiful will be produced by him. Locke is as surely 
the influx of decomposition and of prose, as Bacon and the Platonists 
of growth. The Platonic is the poetic tendency; the so-called scien- 
tific is the negadve and poisonous. 'Tis quite certain that Spenser, 
Burns, Byron, and Wordsworth will be Platonists; and that the dull 
men will be Lockists. Then politics and commerce will absorb from 
the educated class men of talents without genius, precisely because 
such have no resistance. 

Bacon, capable of ideas, yet devoted to ends, required, in his map 
of the mind, first of all, universality, or prima philosophia, the recep- 
tacle for all such profitable observations and axioms as fall not within 
the compass of any of the special parts of philosophy, but are more 
common, and of a higher stage. He held this element essential : it is 
never out of mind: he never spares rebukes for such as neglect it; 
beUeving that no perfect discovery can be made in a flat or level, but 
you must ascend to a higher science. "If any man thinketh philos- 
ophy and universality to be idle studies, he doth not consider that 
all professions are from thence served and supplied, and this I take to 
be a great cause that has hindered the progression of learning, 
because these fundamental knowledges have been studied but in 
passage." He explained himself by giving various quaint examples 
of the summary or common laws, of which each science has its own 
illustration. He complains that "he finds this part of learning very 
deficient, the profounder sort of wits drawing a bucket now and 
then for their own use, but the spring-head unvisited. This was 
the dry light which did scorch and offend most men's watery 
natures." Plato had signified the same sense, when he said, "All 
the great arts require a subde and speculative research into the law 
of nature, since loftiness of thought and perfect mastery over every 
subject seem to be derived from some such source as this. This 



LITERATURE 437 

Pericles had, in addition to a great natural genius. For, meeting 
with Anaxagoras, who was a person of this kind, he attached 
himself to him, and nourished himself with subHme speculations on 
the absolute intelligence; and imported thence into the oratorical 
art whatever could be useful to it." 

A few generalizations always circulate in the world, whose authors 
we do not rightly know, which astonish, and appear to be avenues to 
vast kingdoms of thought, and these are in the world constants, 
like the Copernican and Newtonian theories in physics. In England, 
these may be traced usually to Shakspeare, Bacon, Milton, or Hooker, 
even to Van Helmont and Behmen, and do all have a kind of filial 
retrospect to Plato and the Greeks. Of this kind is Lord Bacon's 
sentence, that "nature is commanded by obeying her;" his doctrine 
of poetry, which "accommodates the shows of things to the desires 
of the mind," or the Zoroastrian definition of poetry, mystical, yet 
exact, "apparent pictures of unapparent natures;" Spenser's creed, 
that "soul is form, and doth the body make;" the theory of Berkeley, 
that we have no certain assurance of the existence of matter; Doctor 
Samuel Clarke's argument for theism from the nature of space and 
time; Harrington's political rule that power must rest on land, — 
a rule which requires to be liberally interpreted; the theory of 
Swedenborg, so cosmically applied by him, that the man makes his 
heaven and hell; Hegel's study of civil history, as the conflict of 
ideas and the victory of the deeper thought; the identity-philosophy 
of Schelling, couched in the statement that "all difference is quantita- 
tive." So the very announcement of the theory of gravitation, of 
Kepler's three harmonic laws, and even of Dalton's doctrine of 
definite proportions, finds a sudden response in the mind, which 
remains a superior evidence to empirical demonstrations. I cite 
these generalizations, some of which are more recent, merely to 
indicate a class. Not these particulars, but the mental plane or the 
atmosphere from which they emanate, was the home and element 
of the writers and readers in what we loosely call the Elizabethan 
age (say, in literary history, the period from 1575 to 1625), yet a 
period almost short enough to justify Ben Jonson's remark on Lord 
Bacon: "About this time, and within his view, were born all the 
wits that could honor a nation, or help study." 



43^ ENGLISH TRAITS 

Such richness of genius had not existed more than once before. 
These heights could not be maintained. As we find stumps of vast 
trees in our exhausted soils, and have received traditions of their 
ancient fertiHty to tillage, so history reckons epochs in which the 
intellect of famed races became effete. So it fared with English 
genius. These heights were followed by a meanness, and a descent 
of the mind into lower levels; the loss of wings; no high speculation. 
Locke, to whom the meaning of ideas was unknown, became the 
type of philosophy, and his "understanding" the measure, in all 
nations, of the English intellect. His countrymen forsook the lofty 
sides of Parnassus, on which they had once walked with echoing 
steps, and disused the studies once so beloved; the powers of thought 
fell into neglect. The later English want the faculty of Plato and 
Aristotle, of grouping men in natural classes by an insight of general 
laws so deep that the rule is deduced with equal precision from few 
subjects or from one, as from multitudes of lives. Shakspeare is 
supreme in that, as in all the great mental energies. The Germans 
generalize: the English cannot interpret the German mind. German 
science comprehends the English. The absence of the faculty in Eng- 
land is shown by the timidity which accumulates mountains of facts, 
as a bad general wants myriads of men and miles of redoubts, to 
compensate the inspirations of courage and conduct. 

The English shrink from a generalization. "They do not look 
abroad into universality, or they draw only a bucket-full at the 
fountain of the First Philosophy for their occasion, and do not go to 
the spring-head." Bacon, who said this, is almost unique among his 
countrymen in that faculty, at least among the prose-writers. Milton, 
who was the stair or high table-land to let down the English genius 
from the summits of Shakspeare, used this privilege sometimes in 
poetry, more rarely in prose. For a long interval afterwards, it is not 
found. Burke was addicted to generalizing, but his was a shorter 
Hne; as his thoughts have less depth, they have less compass. Hume's 
abstractions are not deep or wise. He owes his fame to one keen 
observation, that no copula had been detected between any cause and 
effect, either in physics or in thought; that the term cause and 
effect was loosely or gratuitously applied to what we know only as 
consecutive, not at all as causal. Doctor Johnson's written abstrac- 



LITERATURE 439 

tions have little value: the tone of feeling in them makes their chief 
worth. 

Mr. Hallam, a learned and elegant scholar, has written the history 
of European literature for three centuries, — a performance of great 
ambition, inasmuch as a judgment was to be attempted on every 
book. But his eye does not reach to the ideal standards: the verdicts 
are all dated from London: all new thought must be cast into the 
old moulds. The expansive element which creates literature is 
steadily denied. Plato is resisted, and his school. Hallam is vmi* 
formly polite, but with deficient sympathy; writes with resolute 
generosity, but is unconscious of the deep worth which lies in the 
mysdcs, and which often outvalues as a seed of power and a source 
of revolution all the correct writers and shining reputations of their 
day. He passes in silence, or dismisses with a kind of contempt, the 
profounder masters: a lover of ideas is not only uncongenial, but 
uninteUigible. Hallam inspires respect by his knowledge and fideUty, 
by his manifest love of good books, and he lifts himself to own 
better than almost any the greatness of Shakspeare, and better than 
Johnson he appreciates Milton. But in Hallam, or in the firmer 
intellectual nerve of Mackintosh, one still finds the same type of 
English genius. It is wise and rich, but it Uves on its capital. It is 
retrospective. How can it discern and hail the new forms that are 
looming up on the horizon, — new and gigantic thoughts which 
cannot dress themselves out of any old wardrobe of the past ? 

The essays, the fiction, and the poetry of the day have the like 
municipal limits. Dickens, with preternatural apprehension of the 
language, of the manners, and the varieties of street life, with pathos 
and laughter, with patriotic and still enlarging generosity, writes 
London tracts. He is a painter of English details, like Hogarth; 
local and temporary in his tints and style, and local in his aims. 
Bulwer, an industrious writer, with occasional ability, is distin- 
guished for his reverence of intellect as a temporality, and appeals 
to the worldly ambition of the student. His romances tend to 
fan these low flames. Their novelists despair of the heart. Thackeray 
finds that God has made no allowance for the poor thing in his uni- 
verse; — more's the pity, he thinks; — but 'tis not for us to be wiser: 
we must renounce ideals, and accept London. 



440 ENGLISH TRAITS 

The brilliant Macaulay, who expresses the tone of the EngUsh 
governing classes of the day, explicitly teaches that good means 
good to eat, good to wear, material commodity; that the glory of 
modern philosophy is its direction on "fruit"; to yield economical 
inventions; and that its merit is to avoid ideas, and to avoid morals. 
He thinks it the distinctive merit of the Baconian philosophy, in 
its triumph over the old Platonic, its disentangling the intellect from 
theories of the all-Fair and all-Good, and pinning it down to the 
making a better sick chair and a better wine- whey for an invalid; — 
this not ironically, but in good faith; — that "solid advantage," as 
he calls it, meaning always sensual benefit, is the only good. The 
eminent benefit of astronomy is the better navigation it creates to 
enable the fruit-ships to bring home their lemons and wine to the 
London grocer. It was a curious result, in which the civility and 
religion of England for a thousand years ends in denying morals, 
and reducing the intellect to a saucepan. 

The critic hides his scepticism under the English cant of practical. 
To convince the reason, to touch the conscience, is romantic pre- 
tension. The fine arts fall to the ground. Beauty, except as luxurious 
commodity, does not exist. It is very certain, I may say in passing, 
that if Lord Bacon had been only the sensualist his critic pretends, 
he would never have acquired the fame which now entitles him to 
this patronage. It is because he had imagination, the leisures of 
the spirit, and basked in an element of contemplation out of all 
modern English atmospheric gauges, that he is impressive to the 
imaginations of men, and has become a potentate not to be ignored. 
Sir David Brewster sees the high place of Bacon without finding 
Newton indebted to him, and thinks it a mistake. Bacon occupies 
it by specific gravity or levity, not by any feat he did, or by any 
tutoring, more or less, of Newton, &c., but an effect of the same 
cause which showed itself more pronounced afterwards in Hooke, 
Boyle, and Halley. 

Coleridge, a catholic mind with a hunger for ideas, with eyes 
looking before and after to the highest bards and sages, and who 
wrote and spoke the only high criticism in his time, — is one of those 
who save England from the reproach of no longer possessing the 
capacity to appreciate what rarest wit the island has yielded. Yet the 



LITERATURE 44 1 

misfortune of his life, his vast attempts but most inadequate per- 
formings, faiUng to accomphsh any one masterpiece, seems to mark 
the closing of an era. Even in him, the traditional Englishman was 
too strong for the philosopher, and he fell into accommodations: 
and, as Burke had striven to idealize the English State, so Coleridge 
"narrowed his mind" in the attempt to reconcile the Gothic rule 
and dogma of the Anghcan Church with eternal ideas. But for 
Coleridge, and a lurking taciturn minority, uttering itself in occa- 
sional criticism, oftener in private discourse, one would say that in 
Germany and in America is the best mind in England rightly 
respected. It is the surest sign of national decay, when the Bramins 
can no longer read or understand the Braminical philosophy. 

In the decomposition and asphyxia that followed all this material- 
ism, Carlyle was driven by his disgust at the pettiness and the cant, 
into the preaching of Fate. In comparison with all this rottenness, 
any check, any cleansing, though by fire, seemed desirable and beauti- 
ful. He saw little difference in the gladiators, or the "causes" for 
which they combated; the one comfort was that they were all going 
speedily into the abyss together: And his imagination, finding no 
nutriment in any creation, avenged itself by celebrating the majestic 
beauty of the laws of decay. The necessities of mental structure force 
all minds into a few categories, and where impatience of the tricks 
of men makes Nemesis amiable, and builds altars to the negative 
Deity, the inevitable recoil is to heroism or the gallantry of the 
private heart, which decks its immolation with glory, in the unequal 
combat of will against fate. 

Wilkinson, the editor of Swedenborg, the annotator of Fourier, 
and the champion of Hahnemann, has brought to metaphysics and 
to physiology a native vigor, with a catholic perception of relations, 
equal to the highest attempts, and a rhetoric like the armory of the 
invincible knights of old. There is in the action of his mind a long 
Atlantic roll not known except in deepest waters, and only lacking 
what ought to accompany such powers, a manifest centrality. If his 
mind does not rest in immovable biases, perhaps the orbit is larger, 
and the return is not yet: but a master should inspire a confidence 
that he will adhere to his convictions, and give his present studies 
always the same high place. 



442 ENGLISH TRAITS 

It would be easy to add exceptions to the limitary tone of English 
thought, and much more easy to adduce examples of excellence in 
particular veins: and if, going out of the region of dogma, we pass 
into that of general culture, there is no end of the graces and 
amenities, wit, sensibihty, and erudition, of the learned class. But 
the artificial succor which marks all English performance, appears 
in letters also: much of their aesthetic production is antiquarian and 
manufactured, and literary reputations have been achieved by for- 
cible men, whose relation to literature was purely accidental, but 
who were driven by tastes and modes they found in vogue into their 
several careers. So, at this moment, every ambitious young man 
studies geology: so members of Parliament are made, and church- 
men. 

The bias of Englishmen to practical skill has reacted on the 
national mind. They are incapable of an inutility, and respect the 
five mechanic powers even in their song. The voice of their modern 
muse has a slight hint of the steam-whistle, and the poem is created 
as an ornament and finish of their monarchy, and by no means as 
the bird of a new morning which forgets the past world in the full 
enjoyment of that which is forming. They are with difficulty ideal; 
they are the most conditioned men, as if, having the best conditions, 
they could not bring themselves to forfeit them. Every one of 
them is a thousand years old, and lives by his memory: and when 
you say this, they accept it as praise. 

Nothing comes to the book-shops but politics, travels, statistics, 
tabulation, and engineering, and even what is called philosophy and 
letters is mechanical in its structure, as if inspiration had ceased, 
as if no vast hope, no religion, no song of joy, no wisdom, no analogy, 
existed any more. The tone of colleges, and of scholars and of literary 
society, has this mortal air. I seem to walk on a marble floor, where 
nothing will grow. They exert every variety of talent on a lower 
ground, and may be said to live and act in a sub-mind. They have 
lost all commanding views in literature, philosophy, and science. A 
good Englishman shuts himself out of three-fourths of his mind, 
and confines himself to one-fourth. He has learning, good sense, 
power of labor, and logic: but a faith in the laws of the mind like 
that of Archimedes; a belief like that of Euler and Kepler, that 



LITERATURE 443 

experience must follow and not lead the laws of the mind; a devo- 
tion to the theory of politics, like that of Hooker, and Milton, and 
Harrington, the modern English mind repudiates. 

I fear the same fault Hes in their science, since they have known 
how to make it repulsive, and bereave nature of its charm; — though 
perhaps the complaint flies wider, and the vice attaches to many 
more than to British physicists. The eye of the naturalist must have 
a scope hke nature itself, a susceptibihty to all impressions, aUve to 
the heart as well as to the logic of creation. But English science puts 
humanity to the door. It wants the connection which is the test 
of genius. The science is false by not being poetic. It isolates the 
reptile or mollusk it assumes to explain; whilst reptile or mollusk 
only exists in system, in relation. The poet only sees it as an inevi- 
table step in the path of the Creator. But, in England, one hermit 
finds this fact, and another finds that, and lives and dies ignorant of 
its value. There are great exceptions, of John Hunter, a man of ideas; 
perhaps of Robert Brown, the botanist; and of Richard Owen, who 
has imported into Britain the German homologies, and enriched 
science with contributions of his own, adding sometimes the divina- 
tion of the old masters to the unbroken power of labor in the 
English mind. But for the most part, the natural science in England 
is out of its loyal alliance with morals, and is as void of imagination 
and free play of thought, as conveyancing. It stands in strong con- 
trast with the genius of the Germans, those semi-Greeks, who love 
analogy, and, by means of their height of view, preserve their 
enthusiasm, and think for Europe. 

No hope, no sublime augury, cheers the student, no secure striding 
from experiment onward to a foreseen law, but only a casual dipping 
here and there, like diggers in California "prospecting for a placer" 
that will pay. A horizon of brass of the diameter of his umbrella shuts 
down around his senses. Squalid contentment with conventions, 
satire at the names of philosophy and religion, parochial and shop- 
till politics, and idolatry of usage, betray the ebb of life and spirit. 
As they trample on nationaHties to reproduce London and London- 
ers in Europe and Asia, so they fear the hostiUty of ideas, of poetry, 
of reUgion, — ^ghosts which they cannot lay; — and, having attempted 
to domesticate and dress the Blessed Soul itself in English broad- 



444 ENGLISH TRAITS 

cloth and gaiters, they are tormented with fear that herein lurks a 
force that will sweep their system away. The artists say, "Nature 
puts them out;" the scholars have become un-ideal. They parry 
earnest speech with banter and levity; they laugh you down, or they 
change the subject. "The fact is," say they, over their wine, "all 
that about liberty, and so forth, is gone by; it won't do any longer." 
The practical and comfortable oppress them with inexorable claims, 
and the smallest fraction of power remains for heroism and poetry. 
No poet dares murmur of beauty out of the precinct of his rhymes. 
No priest dares hint at a Providence which does not respect English 
utility. The island is a roaring volcano of fate, of material values, 
of tariffs, and laws of repression, glutted markets, and low prices. 

In the absence of the highest aims, of the pure love of knowledge, 
and the surrender to nature, there is the suppression of the imagina- 
tion, the priapism of the senses and the understanding; we have the 
factitious instead of the natural; tasteless expense, arts of comfort, 
and the rewarding as an illustrious inventor whosoever will con- 
trive one impediment more to interpose between the man and his 
objects. 

Thus poetry is degraded, and made ornamental. Pope and his 
school wrote poetry fit to put round frosted cake. What did Walter 
Scott write without stint? a rhymed traveller's guide to Scotland. 
And the Hbraries of verses they print have this Birmingham charac- 
ter. How many volumes of well-bred metre we must gingle through, 
before we can be filled, taught, renewed! We want the miraculous; 
the beauty which we can manufacture at no mill, — can give no 
account of; the beauty of which Chaucer and Chapman had the 
secret. The poetry of course is low and prosaic; only now and then, 
as in Wordsworth, conscientious; or in Byron, passional, or in Ten- 
nyson, factitious. But if I should count the poets who have con- 
tributed to the bible of existing England sentences of guidance and 
consolation which are still glowing and effective, — how few! Shall 
I find my heavenly bread in the reigning poets? Where is great 
design in modern English poetry? The English have lost sight of 
the fact that poetry exists to speak the spiritual law, and that no 
wealth of description or of fancy is yet essentially new, and out of 
the limits of prose, until this condition is reached. Therefore the 



LITERATURE 445 

grave old poets, like the Greek artists, heeded their designs, and less 
considered the finish. It was their office to lead to the divine sources, 
out of which all this, and much more, readily springs; and, if this 
religion is in the poetry, it raises us to some purpose, and we can 
well afford some staidness, or hardness, or want of popular tune in 
the verses. 

The exceptional fact of the period is the genius of Wordsworth. 
He had no master but nature and solitude. "He wrote a poem," 
says Landor, "without the aid of war." His verse is the voice of 
sanity in a worldly and ambitious age. One regrets that his tempera- 
ment was not more liquid and musical. He has written longer than 
he was inspired. But for the rest, he has no competitor. 

Tennyson is endowed precisely in points where Wordsworth 
wanted. There is no finer ear, nor more command of the keys of 
language. Color, Hke the dawn, flows over the horizon from his 
pencil, in waves so rich that we do not miss the central form. 
Through all his refinements, too, he has reached the public, — a cer- 
tificate of good sense and general power, since he who aspires to be 
the English poet must be as large as London, not in the same kind 
as London, but in his own kind. But he wants a subject, and climbs 
no mount of vision to bring its secrets to the people. He contents 
himself with describing the Englishman as he is, and proposes no 
better. There are all degrees in poetry, and we must be thankful 
for every beautiful talent. But it is only a first success, when the ear 
is gained. The best office of the best poets has been to show how low 
and uninspired was their general style, and that only once or twice 
they have struck the high chord. 

That expansiveness which is the essence of the poetic element, they 
have not. It was no Oxonian, but Hafiz, who said, "Let us be 
crowned with roses, let us drink wine, and break up the tiresome 
old roof of heaven into new forms." A stanza of the song of nature 
the Oxonian has no ear for, and he does not value the salient and 
curative influence of intellectual action, studious of truth, without a 
by-end. 

By the law of contraries, I look for an irresistible taste for Oriental- 
ism in Britain. For a self-conceited modish life, made up of trifles, 
clinging to a corporeal civilization, hating ideas, there is no remedy 



446 ENGLISH TRAITS 

like the Oriental largeness. That astonishes and disconcerts English 
decorum. For once there is thunder it never heard, Ught it never 
saw, and power which trifles with time and space. I am not sur- 
prised, then, to find an Englishman like Warren Hastings, who had 
been struck with the grand style of thinking in the Indian writings, 
deprecating the prejudices of his countrymen, while offering them a 
translation of the Bhagvat. "Might I, an unlettered man, venture to 
prescribe bounds to the latitude of criticism, I should exclude, in 
estimating the merit of such a production, all rules drawn from the 
ancient or modern Uterature of Europe, all references to such senti- 
ments or manners as are become the standards of propriety for 
opinion and action in our modes, and, equally, all appeals to our 
revealed tenets of religion and moral duty." ^ He goes on to bespeak 
indulgence to "ornaments of fancy unsuited to our taste, and passages 
elevated to a tract of sublimity into which our habits of judgment 
will find it difficult to pursue them." 

Meantime, I know that a retrieving power lies in the English 
race, which seems to make any recoil possible; in other words, there 
is at all times a minority of profound minds existing in the nation, 
capable of appreciating every soaring of intellect and every hint of 
tendency. While the constructive talent seems dwarfed and super- 
ficial, the criticism is often in the noblest tone, and suggests the 
presence of the invisible gods. I can well beheve what I have often 
heard, that there are two nations in England; but it is not the Poor 
and the Rich; nor is it the Normans and Saxons; nor the Celt and 
the Goth. These are each always becoming the other; for Robert 
Owen does not exaggerate the power of circumstance. But the two 
complexions, or two styles of mind, — the perceptive class, and the 
practical finality class, — are ever in counterpoise, interacting mutu- 
ally; one in hopeless minorities; the other, in huge masses; one 
studious, contemplative, experimenting: the other, the ungrateful 
pupil, scornful of the source, whilst availing itself of the knowledge 
for gain; these two nations, of genius and of animal force, though 
the first consist of only a dozen souls, and the second of twenty 
millions, forever by their discord and their accord yield the power 
of the EngHsh State. 

' Preface to Wilkins's Translation of the Bhagvat Geeta. 



THE TIMES 447 

CHAPTER XV 

THE "times" 

The power of the newspaper is familiar in America, and in ac- 
cordance with our pohtical system. In England, it stands in antag- 
onism with the feudal institutions, and it is all the more beneficent 
succor against the secretive tendencies of a monarchy. The cele- 
brated Lord Somers "knew of no good law proposed and passed in 
his time, to which the public papers had not directed his attention." 
There is no corner and no night. A relentless inquisition drags every 
secret to the day, turns the glare of this solar microscope on every 
malfaisance, so as to make the public a more terrible spy than any 
foreigner; and no weakness can be taken advantage of by an enemy, 
since the whole people are already forewarned. Thus England rids 
herself of those incrustations which have been the ruin of old states. 
Of course, this inspection is feared. No antique privilege, no com- 
fortable monopoly, but sees surely that its days are counted; the 
people are familiarized with the reason of reform, and, one by one, 
take away every argument of the obstructives. "So your grace likes 
the comfort of reading the newspapers," said Lord Mansfield to the 
Duke of Northumberland; "mark my words; you and I shall not 
live to see it, but this young gentleman (Lord Eldon) may, or it 
may be a little later; but a little sooner or later, these newspapers 
will most assuredly write the dukes of Northumberland out of their 
titles and possessions, and the country out of its king." The tendency 
in England towards social and political institutions like those of 
America, is inevitable, and the ability of its journals is the driving 
force. 

England is full of manly, clever, well-bred men who possess the 
talent of writing off-hand pungent paragraphs, expressing with clear- 
ness and courage their opinion on any person or performance. 
Valuable or not, it is a skill that is rarely found, out of the EngUsh 
journals. The English do this, as they write poetry, as they ride 
and box, by being educated to it. Hundreds of clever Praeds, and 
Freres and Froudes, and Hoods, and Hooks, and Maginns, and 
Mills, and Macaulays, make poems or short essays for a journal, as 



44^ ENGLISH TRAITS 

they make speeches in ParUament and on the hustings, or as they 
shoot and ride. It is a quite accidental and arbitrary direction of their 
general abihty. Rude health and spirits, an Oxford education, and 
the habits of' society are implied, but not a ray of genius. It comes 
of the crowded state of the professions, the violent interest which 
all men take in politics, the facility of experimenting in the journals, 
and high pay. 

The most conspicuous result of this talent is the "Times" news- 
paper. No power in England is more felt, more feared, or more 
obeyed. What you read in the morning in that journal, you shall 
hear in the evening in all society. It has ears everywhere, and its 
information is earliest, completest, and surest. It has risen, year by 
year, and victory by victory, to its present authority. I asked one of 
its old contributors, whether it had once been abler than it is now ? 
"Never," he said; "these are its palmiest days." It has shown those 
qualities which are dear to Englishmen, unflinching adherence to 
its objects, prodigal intellectual ability, and a towering assurance, 
backed by the perfect organization in its printing-house, and its 
world-wide network of correspondence and reports. It has its own 
history and famous trophies. In 1820, it adopted the cause of Queen 
Caroline, and carried it against the king. It adopted a poor-law 
system, and almost alone lifted it through. When Lord Brougham 
was in power, it decided against him, and pulled him down. It 
declared war against Ireland, and conquered it. It adopted the 
League against the Corn Laws, and, when Cobden had begun to 
despair, it announced his triumph. It denounced and discredited 
the French Republic of 1848, and checked every sympathy with it 
in England, until it had enrolled 200,000 special constables to watch 
the Chartists, and make them ridiculous on the loth April. It first 
denounced and then adopted the new French Empire, and urged 
the French Alliance and its results. It has entered into each munic- 
ipal, literary, and social question, almost with a controlling voice. 
It has done bold and seasonable service in exposing frauds which 
threatened the commercial community. Meantime, it attacks its 
rivals by perfecting its printing machinery, and will drive them out 
of circulation: for the only limit to the circulation of the "Times" 
is the impossibility of printing copies fast enough; since a daily 



THE TIMES 449 

paper can only be new and seasonable for a few hours. It will kill 
all but that paper which is diametrically in opposition; since many 
papers, first and last, have Uved by their attacks on the leading 
journal. 

The late Mr. Walter was printer of the "Times," and had gradu- 
ally arranged the whole materiel of it in perfect system. It is told 
that when he demanded a small share in the proprietary, and was 
refused, he said, "As you please, gendemen; and you may take 
away the 'Times' from this office, when you will; I shall pubUsh the 
'New Times,' next Monday morning." The proprietors, who had 
already complained that his charges for printing were excessive, 
found that they were in his power, and gave him whatever he 
wished. 

I went one day with a good friend to the "Times" office, which 
was entered through a pretty garden-yard, in Printing-House Square. 
We walked with some circumspection, as if we were entering a 
powder-mill; but the door was opened by a mild old woman, and, 
by dint of some transmission of cards, we were at last conducted into 
the parlor of Mr. Morris, a very gentle person, with no hostile ap- 
pearances. The statistics are now quite out of date, but I remember 
he told us that the daily printing was then 35,000 copies; that on 
the 1st March, 1848, the greatest number ever printed, — 54,000 were 
issued; that since February, the daily circulation had increased by 
8,000 copies. The old press they were then using printed five or six 
thousand sheets per hour; the new machine, for which they were 
then building an engine, would print twelve thousand per hour. 
Our entertainer confided us to a courteous assistant to show us the 
establishment, in which, I think, they employed a hundred and 
twenty men. I remember I saw the reporters' room, in which they 
redact their hasty stenographs, but the editor's room, and who is in 
it, I did not see, though I shared the curiosity of mankind respect- 
ing it. 

The staff of the "Times" has always been made up of able men. 
Old Walter, Sterling, Bacon, Barnes, Alsiger, Horace Twiss, Jones 
Loyd, John Oxenford, Mr. Moseley, Mr. Bailey, have contributed to 
its renown in their special departments. But it has never wanted 
the first pens for occasional assistance. Its private information is 



450 ENGLISH TRAITS 

inexplicable, and recalls the stories of Fouche's police, whose om- 
niscience made it beUeved that the Empress Josephine must be in 
his pay. It has mercantile and political correspondents in every 
foreign city; and its expresses outrun the despatches of the govern- 
ment. One hears anecdotes of the rise of its servants, as of the func- 
tionaries of tlie India House. I was told of the dexterity of one of 
its reporters, who, finding himself, on one occasion, where the 
magistrates had stricdy forbidden reporters, put his hands into his 
coat-pocket, and with pencil in one hand, and tablet in the other, 
did his work. 

The influence of this journal is a recognized power in Europe, 
and, of course, none is more conscious of it than its conductors. The 
tone of its articles has often been the occasion of comment from the 
official organs of the continental courts, and sometimes the ground 
of diplomadc complaint. What would the "Times" say? is a terror 
in Paris, in Berlin, in Vienna, in Copenhagen, and in Nepaul. Its con- 
summate discretion and success exhibit the English skill of combina- 
tion. The daily paper is the work of many hands, chiefly, it is said, 
of young men recently from the University, and perhaps reading 
law in chambers in London. Hence the academic elegance, and 
classic allusion, which adorn its columns. Hence, too, the heat and 
gallantry of its onset. But the steadiness of the aim suggests the 
behef that this fire is directed and fed by older engineers; as if per- 
sons of exact information, and with settled views of policy, supplied 
the writers with the basis of fact, and the object to be attained, and 
availed themselves of their younger energy and eloquence to plead 
the cause. Both the council and the execudve departments gain by 
this division. Of two men of equal ability, the one who does not 
write, but keeps his eye on the course of pubhc affairs, will have the 
higher judicial wisdom. But the parts are kept in concert; all the 
articles appear to proceed from a single will. The "Times" never 
disapproves of what itself has said, or cripples itself by apology for 
the absence of the editor, or the indiscretion of him who held the 
pen. It speaks out bluff and bold, and sdcks to what it says. It draws 
from any number of learned and skilful contributors; but a more 
learned and skilful person supervises, corrects, and coordinates. Of 
this closet, the secret does not transpire. No writer is suffered to 



THE TIMES 451 

claim the authorship of any paper; everything good, from whatever 
quarter, comes out editorially; and thus, by making the paper every- 
thing, and those who write it nothing, the character and the awe 
of the journal gain. 

The English like it for its complete information. A statement 
of fact in the "Times" is as reliable as a citation from Hansard. Then, 
they like its independence; they do not know, when they take it up, 
what their paper is going to say: but, above all, for the nationality 
and confidence of its tone. It thinks for them all; it is their under- 
standing and day's ideal daguerreotyped. When I see them reading 
its columns, they seem to me becoming every moment more British. 
It has the national courage, not rash and petulant, but considerate 
and determined. No dignity or wealth is a shield from its assault. 
It attacks a duke as readily as a policeman, and with the most pro- 
voking airs of condescension. It makes rude work with the Board 
of Admiralty. The Bench of Bishops is still less safe. One Bishop 
fares badly for his rapacity, and another for his bigotry, and a third 
for his courtliness. It addresses occasionally a hint to Majesty itself, 
and sometimes a hint which is taken. There is an air of freedom 
even in their advertising columns, which speaks well for England 
to a foreigner. On the days when I arrived in London in 1847, I 
read among the daily announcements, one offering a reward of fifty 
pounds to any person who would put a nobleman, described by name 
and title, late a member of Parliament, into any county jail in Eng- 
land, he having been convicted of obtaining money under false 
pretences. 

Was never such arrogancy as the tone of this paper. Every slip 
of an Oxonian or Cantabrigian who writes his first leader, assumes 
that we subdued the earth before we sat down to write this particular 
"Times." One would think, the world was on its knees to the 
"Times" Office for its daily breakfast. But this arrogance is calcu- 
lated. Who would care for it if it "surmised," or "dared to confess," 
or "ventured to predict," &c. No; it is so, and so it shall be. 

The morality and patriotism of the "Times" claims only to be 
representative, and by no means ideal. It gives the argument, not 
of the majority, but of the commanding class. Its editors know bet- 
ter than to defend Russia, or Austria, or English vested rights, on 



452 ENGLISH TRAITS 

abstract grounds. But they give a voice to the class who, at the 
moment, take the lead; and they have an instinct for finding where 
the power now Hes, which is eternally shifting its banks. Sympa- 
thizing with and speaking for the class that rules the hour, yet being 
apprised of every ground-swell, every Chartist resolution, every 
Church squabble, every strike in the mills, they detect the first 
tremblings of change. They watch the hard and bitter struggles 
of the authors of each liberal movement, year by year, — watching 
them only to taunt and obstruct them, — until, at last, when they see 
that these have established their fact, that power is on the point of 
passing to them, — they strike in, with the voice of a monarch, 
astonish those whom they succor, as much as those whom they desert, 
and make victory sure. Of course, the aspirants see that the "Times" 
is one of the goods of fortune, not to be won but by winning their 
cause. 

"Punch" is equally an expression of English good sense, as the 
"London Times." It is the comic version of the same sense. Many 
of its caricatures are equal to the best pamphlets, and will convey 
to the eye in an instant the popular view which was taken of each 
turn of public affairs. Its sketches are usually made by masterly 
hands, and sometimes with genius; the delight of every class, because 
uniformly guided by that taste which is tyrannical in England. It 
is a new trait of the nineteenth century that the wit and humor of 
England, as in Punch, so in the humorists, Jerrold, Dickens, Thack- 
eray, Hood, have taken the direction of humanity and freedom. 

The "Times," like every important institution, shows the way to a 
better. It is a living index of the colossal British power. Its existence 
honors the people who dare to print all they know, dare to know all 
the facts, and do not wish to be flattered by hiding the extent of 
the public disaster. There is always safety in valor. I wish I could 
add that this journal aspired to deserve the power it wields, by 
guidance of the public sentiment to the right. It is usually pretended, 
in Parliament and elsewhere, that the English press has a high tone, 
— which it has not. It has an imperial tone as of a powerful and 
independent nation. But as with other empires, its tone is prone to 
be official, and even officinal. The "Times" shares all the limitations 
of the governing classes, and wishes never to be in a minority. If 



STONEHENGE 453 

only it dared to cleave to the right, to show the right to be the only 
expedient, and feed its batteries from the central heart of humanity, 
it might not have so many men of rank among its contributors, but 
genius would be its cordial and invincible ally; it might now and 
then bear the brunt of formidable combinations, but no journal is 
ruined by wise courage. It would be the natural leader of British 
reform; its proud function, that of being the voice of Europe, the 
defender of the exile and patriot against despots, would be more 
effectually discharged; it would have the authority which is claimed 
for that dream of good men not yet come to pass, an International 
Congress; and the least of its victories would be to give to England 
a new millennium of beneficent power. 

CHAPTER XVI 

STONEHENGE 

It had been agreed between my friend Mr. C. and me, that before 
I left England we should make an excursion together to Stonehenge, 
which neither of us had seen; and the project pleased my fancy 
with the double attraction of the monument and the companion. It 
seemed a bringing together of extreme points, to visit the oldest 
religious monument in Britain, in company with her latest thinker, 
and one whose influence may be traced in every contemporary book. 
I was glad to sum up a little my experiences, and to exchange a few 
reasonable words on the aspects of England, with a man on whose 
genius I set a very high value, and who had as much penetration, 
and as severe a theory of duty, as any person in it. On Friday, 7th 
July, we took the South Western Railway through Hampshire to 
Salisbury, where we found a carriage to convey us to Amesbury. 
The fine weather and my friend's local knowledge of Hampshire, 
in which he is wont to spend a part of every summer, made the 
way short. There was much to say, too, of the travelling Americans, 
and their usual objects in London. I thought it natural that they 
should give some time to works of art collected here, which they 
cannot find at home, and a litde to scientific clubs and museums, 
which at this moment, make London very attractive. But my phil- 



454 ENGLISH TRAITS 

osopher was not contented. Art and "high art" is a favorite target 
for his wit. "Yes, Kunst is a great delusion, and Goethe and Schiller 
wasted a great deal of good time on it:" — and he thinks he dis- 
covers that old Goethe found this out, and, in his later writings, 
changed his tone. As soon as men begin to talk of art, architecture, 
and antiquities, nothing good comes of it. He wishes to go through 
the British Museum in silence, and thinks a sincere man will see 
something, and say nothing. In these days, he thought, it would 
become an architect to consult only the grim necessity, and say, "I 
can build you a coffin for such dead persons as you are, and for 
such dead purposes as you have, but you shall have no ornament.'* 
For the science, he had, if possible, even less tolerance, and com- 
pared the savans of Somerset House to the boy who asked Confucius 
"how many stars in the sky?" Confucius replied, "he minded things 
near him:" then said the boy, "how many hairs are there in your 
eyebrows?" Confucius said, "he didn't know and didn't care." 

Still speaking of the Americans, C. complained that they dislike 
the coldness and exclusiveness of the English, and run away to 
France, and go with their countrymen, and are amused, instead of 
manfully staying in London, and confronting Englishmen, and 
acquiring their culture, who really have much to teach them. 

I told C. that I was easily dazzled, and was accustomed to concede 
readily all that an Englishman would ask; I saw everywhere in 
the country proofs of sense and spirit, and success of every sort: 
I like the people: they are as good as they are handsome; they have 
everything, and can do everything: but meantime, I surely know 
that, as soon as I return to Massachusetts, I shall lapse at once into 
the feeling, which the geography of America inevitably inspires, 
that we play the game with immense advantage; that there and not 
here is the seat and centre of the British race: and that no skill or 
activity can long compete with the prodigious natural advantages 
of that country, in the hands of the same race; and that England, 
an old and exhausted island, must one day be contented, like other 
parents, to be strong only in her children. But this was a proposition 
which no Englishman of whatever condition can easily entertain. 

We left the train at SaUsbury, and took a carriage to Amesbury, 
passing by Old Sarum, a bare, treeless hill, once containing the 



STONEHENGE 455 

town which sent two members to Parliament, — now, not a hut; — 
and, arriving at Amesbury, stopped at the George Inn. After dinner, 
we walked to Salisbury Plain. On the broad downs, under the gray 
sky, not a house was visible, nothing but Stonehenge, which looked 
like a group of brown dwarfs in the wide expanse, — Stonehenge and 
the barrows, — which rose like green bosses about the plain, and a few 
hayricks. On the top of a mountain, the old temple would not be 
more impressive. Far and wide a few shepherds with their flocks 
sprinkled the plain, and a bagman drove along the road. It looked 
as if the wide margin given in this crowded isle to this primeval 
temple were accorded by the veneration of the British race to the 
old egg out of which all their ecclesiastical structures and history 
had proceeded. Stonehenge is a circular colonnade with a diameter 
of a hundred feet, and enclosing a second and third colonnade 
within. We walked round the stones, and clambered over them, to 
wont ourselves with their strange aspect and groupings, and found 
a nook sheltered from the wind among them, where C. Hghted his 
cigar. It was pleasant to see that just this simplest o£ all simple 
structures, — two upright stones and a lintel laid across, — had long 
outstood all later churches, and all history, and were like what is 
most permanent on the face of the planet: these, and the barrows, — 
mere mounds (of which there are a hundred and sixty within a 
circle of three miles about Stonehenge), like the same mound on 
the plain of Troy, which still makes good to the passing mariner 
on Hellespont the vaunt of Homer and the fame of Achilles. With- 
in the enclosure, grow buttercups, nettles, and, all around, wild 
thyme, daisy, meadowsweet, goldenrod, thisde, and the carpeting 
grass. Over us, larks were soaring and singing, — as my friend said, 
"the larks which were hatched last year, and the wind which was 
hatched many thousand years ago." We counted and measured 
by paces the biggest stones, and soon knew as much as any man 
can suddenly know of the inscrutable temple. There are ninety-four 
stones, and there were once probably one hundred and sixty. The 
temple is circular, and uncovered, and the situation fixed astronom- 
ically, — the grand entrances here, and at Abury, being placed exactly 
northeast, "as all the gates o£ the old cavern temples are." How 
came the stones here? for these sarsens, or Druidical sandstones, are 



456 ENGLISH TRAITS 

not found in this neighborhood. The sacrificial stone, as it is called, 
is the only one in all these blocks, that can resist the action of fire, 
and as I read in the books, must have been brought one hundred 
and fifty miles. 

On almost every stone we found the marks of the mineralogist's 
hammer and chisel. The nineteen smaller stones of the inner circle 
are of granite. I, who had just come from Professor Sedgwick's 
Cambridge Museum of megatheria and mastodons, was ready to 
maintain that some cleverer elephants or mylodonta had borne off 
and laid these rocks one on another. Only the good beasts must 
have known how to cut a well- wrought tenon and mortise, and to 
smooth the surface of some of the stones. The chief mystery is that 
any mystery should have been allowed to settle on so remarkable 
a monument, in a country on which all the muses have kept their 
eyes now for eighteen hundred years. We are not yet too late to learn 
much more than is known of this structure. Some diligent Fellowes 
or Layard will arrive, stone by stone, at the whole history, by that 
exhaustive British sense and perseverance, so whimsical in its 
choice of objects, which leaves its own Stonehenge, or Choir Gaur 
to the rabbits, whilst it opens pyramids, and uncovers Nineveh. 
Stonehenge, in virtue of the simplicity of its plan, and its good 
preservation, is as if new and recent; and, a thousand years hence, 
men will thank this age for the accurate history it will yet eliminate. 
We walked in and out, and took again and again a fresh look at 
the uncanny stones. The old sphinx put our petty differences of 
nationaUty out of sight. To these conscious stones we two pilgrims 
were alike known and near. We could equally well revere their old 
British meaning. My philosopher was subdued and gentle. In this 
quiet house of destiny, he happened to say, "I plant cypresses wher- 
ever I go, and if I am in search of pain, I cannot go wrong." The 
spot, the gray blocks, and their rude order, which refuses to be 
disposed of, suggested to him the flight of ages, and the succession 
of religions. The old times of England impress C. much: he reads 
litde, he says, in these last years, but "Acta Sanctorum," the fifty- 
three volumes of which are in the "London Library." He finds all 
English history therein. He can see, as he reads, the old saint of 



STONEHENGE 457 

lona sitting there, and writing, a man to men. The Acta Sanctorum 
show plainly that the men of those times believed in God, and in 
the immortality of the soul, as their abbeys and cathedrals testify: 
now, even the puritanism is all gone. London is pagan. He fancied 
that greater men had lived in England, than any of her writers; 
and, in fact, about the time when those writers appeared, the last 
of these were already gone. 

We left the mound in the twilight, with the design to return the 
next morning, and coming back two miles to our inn, we were met 
by little showers, and late as it was, men and women were out at- 
tempting to protect their spread windrows. The grass grows rank 
and dark in the showery England. At the inn, there was only milk 
for one cup of tea. When we called for more, the girl brought us 
three drops. My friend was annoyed who stood for the credit of an 
English inn, and still more, the next morning, by the dogcart, sole 
procurable vehicle, in which we were to be sent to Wilton. I engaged 
the local antiquary, Mr. Brown, to go with us to Stonehenge, on our 
way, and show us what he knew of the "astronomical" and "sacri- 
ficial" stones. I stood on the last, and he pointed to the upright, or 
rather, inclined stone, called the "astronomical," and bade me notice 
that its top ranged with the sky-line. "Yes." Very well. Now, at 
the summer solstice, the sun rises exactly over the top of that stone, 
and, at the Druidical temple at Abury, there is also an astronomical 
stone in the same relative positions. 

In the silence of tradition, this one relation to science becomes an 
important clew; but we were content to leave the problem with the 
rocks. Was this the "Giants' Dance" which Merlin brought from 
Killaraus, in Ireland, to be Uther Pendragon's monument to the 
British nobles whom Hengist slaughtered here, as Geoffrey of Mon- 
mouth relates ? or was it a Roman work, as Inigo Jones explained to 
King James; or identical in design and style with the East Indian 
temples of the sun; as Davies in the Celtic Researches maintains? 
Of all the writers, Stukeley is the best. The heroic antiquary, 
charmed with the geometric perfections of his ruin, connects it with 
the oldest monuments and religion of the world, and, with the 
courage of his tribe, does not stick to say, "the Deity who made 



458 ENGLISH TRAITS 

the world by the scheme of Stonehenge." He finds that the cursus^ 
on Salisbury Plain stretches across the downs, like a line of latitude 
upon the globe, and the meridian line of Stonehenge passes exactly 
through the middle of this curstis. But here is the high point of the 
theory: the Druids had the magnet; laid their courses by it; their 
cardinal points in Stonehenge, Ambresbury, and elsewhere, which 
vary a litde from true east, and west, followed the variations of the 
compass. The Druids were Phoenicians. The name of the magnet 
is lapis Heradeus, and Hercules was the god of the Phoenicians. 
Hercules, in the legend, drew his bow at the sun, and the sun-god 
gave him a golden cup, with which he sailed over the ocean. What 
was this, but a compass-box? This cup or little boat, in which the 
magnet was made to float on water, and so show the north, was 
probably its first form, before it was suspended on a pin. But science 
was an arcanum, and, as Britain was a Phoenician secret, so they 
kept their compass a secret, and it was lost with the Tyrian com- 
merce. The golden fleece, again, of Jason, was the compass, — a bit 
of loadstone, easily supposed to be the only one in the world, and 
therefore naturally awakening the cupidity and ambition of the 
young heroes of a maritime nation to join in an expedition to obtain 
possession of this wise stone. Hence the fable that the ship Argo 
was loquacious and oracular. There is also some curious coincidence 
in the names. Apollodorus makes Magnes the son of /Eolus, who 
married Nats. On hints like these, Stukeley builds again the grand 
colonnade into historic harmony, and computing backward by the 
known variadons of the compass, bravely assigns the year 406 before 
Christ for the date of the temple. 

For the difficulty of handling and carrying stones of this size, the 
like is done in all cities, every day, with no other aid than horse 
power. I chanced to see a year ago men at work on the substructure 
of a house in Bowdoin Square, in Boston, swinging a block of granite 
the size of the largest of the Stonehenge columns with an ordinary 
derrick. The men were common masons, with paddies to help, nor 

' Connected with Stonehenge are an avenue and a cttrsus. The avenue is a 
narrow road of raised earth, extending 594 yards in a straight line from the grand 
entrance, then dividing into two branches, which led, severally, to a row of 
barrows; and to the ctirsus, — an artificially formed flat tract of ground. This is half 
a mile northeast from Stonehenge, bounded by banks and ditches, 3,036 yards long, 
by no broad. 



STONEHENGE 459 

did they diink they were doing anything remarkable. I suppose, 
there were as good men a thousand years ago. And we wonder how 
Stonehenge was built and forgotten. After spending half an hour 
on the spot, we set forth in our dogcart over the downs for Wilton, 
C. not suppressing some threats and evil omens on the proprietors, 
for keeping these broad plains a wretched sheep-walk, when so many 
thousands of English men were hungry and wanted labor. But I 
heard afterwards that it is not an economy to cultivate this land, 
which only yields one crop on being broken up, and is then spoiled. 

We came to Wilton and to Wilton Hall,— the renowned seat of 
the Earls of Pembroke, a house known to Shakspeare and Massinger, 
the frequent home of Sir Philip Sidney, where he wrote the Arcadia; 
where he conversed with Lord Brooke, a man of deep thought, and 
a poet, who caused to be engraved on his tombstone, "Here lies 
Fulke Greville Lord Brooke, the friend of Sir Philip Sidney." It 
is now the property of the Earl of Pembroke, and the residence of 
his brother, Sidney Herbert, Esq., and is esteemed a noble specimen 
of English manor-hall. My friend had a letter from Mr. Herbert 
to his housekeeper, and the house was shown. The state drawing- 
room is a double cube, 30 feet high, by 30 feet wide, by 60 feet long: 
the adjoining room is a single cube, of 30 feet every way. Although 
these apartments and the long library were full of good family por- 
traits, Vandykes and others, and though there were some good pic- 
tures, and a quadrangle cloister full of antique and modern statuary, 
— to which C, catalogue in hand, did all too much justice, — ^yet the 
eye was still drawn to the windows, to a magnificent lawn, on which 
grew the finest cedars in England. I had not seen more charming 
grounds. We went out, and walked over the estate. We crossed a 
bridge built by Inigo Jones over a stream, of which the gardener 
did not know the name (Qu. Alph?), watched the deer; cUmbed 
to the lonely sculptured summer house, on a hill backed by a wood; 
came down into the Italian garden, and into a French pavilion, 
garnished with French busts; and so again to the house, where we 
found a table laid for us with bread, meats, peaches, grapes, and 
wine. 

On leaving Wilton House, we took the coach for Salisbury. The 
Cathedral, which was finished 600 years ago, has even a spruce and 



460 ENGLISH TRAITS 

modern air, and its spire is the highest in England. I know not why, 
but I had been more struck with one o£ no fame at Coventry, which 
rises 300 feet from the ground, with the lightness of a mullein-plant, 
and not at all implicated with the church. Salisbury is now esteemed 
the culmination of the Gothic art in England, as the buttresses are 
fully unmasked, and honestly detailed from the sides of the pile. 
The interior of the Cathedral is obstructed by the organ in the 
middle, acting like a screen. I know not why in real architecture 
the hunger of the eye for length of line is so rarely gratified. The 
rule of art is that a colonnade is more beautiful the longer it is, 
and that ad infinitum. And the nave of a church is seldom so long 
that it need be divided by a screen. 

We loitered in the church, outside the choir, whilst service was 
said. Whilst we listened to the organ, my friend remarked, the 
music is good, and yet not quite religious, but somewhat as if a 
monk were panting to some fine Queen of Heaven. C. was unwill- 
ing, and we did not ask to have the choir shown us, but returned to 
our inn, after seeing another old church of the place. We passed in 
the train Clarendon Park, but could see little but the edge of a 
wood, though C. had wished to pay closer attention to the birth- 
place of the Decrees of Clarendon. At Bishopstoke we stopped, and 
found Mr. H., who received us in his carriage, and took us to his 
house at Bishops Waltham. 

On Sunday, we had much discourse on a very rainy day. My 
friends asked whether there were any Americans? — any with an 
American idea, — any theory of the right future of that country? 
Thus challenged, I bethought myself neither of caucuses nor con- 
gress, neither of presidents nor of cabinet-ministers, nor of such 
as would make of America another Europe. I thought only of the 
simplest and purest minds; I said, "Certainly yes; — but those who 
hold it are fanatics of a dream which I should hardly care to relate 
to your English ears, to which it might be only ridiculous, — and yet 
it is the only true." So I opened the dogma of no-government and 
non-resistance, and anticipated the objections and the fun, and pro- 
cured a kind of hearing for it. I said, it is true that I have never 
seen in any country a man of sufficient valor to stand for this truth, 
and yet it is plain to me that no less valor than this can command 



STONEHENGE 461 

my respect. I can easily see the bankruptcy of the vulgar musket- 
worship, — though great men be musket-worshippers; — and 'tis cer- 
tain, as God liveth, the gun that does not need another gun, the 
law of love and justice alone, can effect a clean revolution. I fancied 
that one or two of my anecdotes made some impression on C, and 
I insisted that the manifest absurdity of the view to English feasi- 
bility could make no difference to a gentleman; that as to our secure 
tenure of our mutton-chop and spinage in London or in Boston, 
the soul might quote Talleyrand, "Monsieur, je n'en vols pas la 
necessite."' As I had thus taken in the conversation the saint's part, 
when dinner was announced, C. refused to go out before me, — "he 
was altogether too wicked." I planted my back against the wall, 
and our host wittily rescued us from the dilemma, by saying, he 
was the wickedest, and would walk out first, then C. followed, and 
I went last. 

On the way to Winchester, whither our host accompanied us in 
the afternoon, my friends asked many questions respecting Amer- 
ican landscape, forests, houses, — my house, for example. It is not 
easy to answer these queries well. There I thought, in America, 
lies nature sleeping, overgrowing, almost conscious, too much by 
half for man in the picture, and so giving a certain tristesse, hke 
the rank vegetation of swamps and forests seen at night, steeped in 
dews and rains, which it loves; and on it man seems not able to 
make much impression. There, in that great sloven continent, in 
high Alleghany pastures, in the sea-wide, sky skirted prairie, still 
sleeps and murmurs and hides the great mother, long since driven 
away from the trim hedge-rows and over-cultivated garden of 
England. And, in England, I am quite too sensible of this. Every 
one is on his good behavior, and must be dressed for dinner at six. 
So I put off my friends with very inadequate details, as best I could. 

Just before entering Winchester, we stopped at the Church of 
Saint Cross, .and, after looking through the quaint antiquity, we 
demanded a piece of bread and a draught of beer, which the founder, 
Henry de Blois, in 1136, commanded should be given to every one 
who should ask it at the gate. We had both, from the old couple 
who take care of the church. Some twenty people, every day, they 

2 "Mais, Monseigneur, il faut que fexiste." 



462 ENGLISH TRAITS 

said, make the same demand. This hospitality of seven hundred 
years' standing did not hinder C. from pronouncing a malediction 
on the priest who receives ;^2ooo a year, that were meant for the 
poor, and spends a pittance on this small beer and crumbs. 

In the Cathedral I was gratified, at least by the ample dimensions. 
The length of line exceeds that of any other English church; being 
556 feet by 250 in breadth of transept. I think I prefer this church 
to all I have seen, except Westminster and York. Here was Canute 
buried, and here Alfred the Great was crowned and buried, and 
here the Saxon kings: and, later, in his own church, William of 
Wykeham. It is very old : part of the crypt into which we went down 
and saw the Saxon and Norman arches of the old church on which 
the present stands, was built fourteen or fifteen hundred years ago. 
Sharon Turner says, "Alfred was buried at Winchester, in the Abbey 
he had founded there, but his remains were removed by Henry I. 
to the new Abbey in the meadows at Hyde, on the northern quarter 
of the city, and laid under the high altar. The building was de- 
stroyed at the Reformation, and what is left of Alfred's body now 
lies covered by modern buildings, or buried in the ruins of the old."^ 
William of Wykeham's shrine tomb was unlocked for us, and C. 
took hold of the recumbent statue's marble hands, and patted them 
affectionately, for he rightly values the brave man who built Wind- 
sor, and this Cathedral, and the School here, and New College at 
Oxford. But it was growing late in the afternoon. Slowly we left 
the old house, and parting with our host, we took the train for 
London. 

CHAPTER XVII 

PERSONAL 

In these comments on an old journey now revised after seven busy 
years have much changed men and things in England, I have ab- 
stained from reference to persons, except in the last chapter, and in 
one or two cases where the fame of the parties seemed to have given 
the public a property in all that concerned them. I must further 
allow myself a few notices, if only as an acknowledgment of debts 
that cannot be paid. My journeys were cheered by so much kindness 

^ History o£ the Anglo-Saxons, I., 599. 



PERSONAL 463 

from new friends, that my impression of the island is bright with 
agreeable memories both of public societies and of households: and, 
what is nowhere better found than in England, a cultivated person 
fitly surrounded by a happy home, "with honor, love, obedience, 
troops of friends," is of all institutions the best. At the landing in 
Liverpool, I found my Manchester correspondent awaiting me, a 
gendeman whose kind reception was followed by a train of friendly 
and effective attentions which never rested whilst I remained in 
the country. A man of sense and of letters, the editor of a powerful 
local journal, he added to solid virtues an infinite sweetness and 
bonhommie. There seemed a pool of honey about his heart which 
lubricated all his speech and action with fine jets of mead. An 
equal good fortune attended many later accidents of my journey, 
until the sincerity of English kindness ceased to surprise. My visit 
fell in the fortunate days when Mr. Bancroft was the American 
Minister in London, and at his house, or through his good offices, 
I had easy access to excellent persons and to privileged places. At 
the house of Mr. Carlyle, I met persons eminent in society and in 
letters. The privileges of the Athenaeum and of the Reform Clubs 
were hospitably opened to me, and I found much advantage in the 
circles of the "Geologic," the "Antiquarian," and the "Royal Soci- 
eties." Every day in London gave me new opportunities of meeting 
men and women who give splendor to society. I saw Rogers, 
Hallam, Macaulay, Milnes, Milman, Barry Cornwall, Dickens, 
Thackeray, Tennyson, Leigh Hunt, D'Israeli, Helps, Wilkinson, 
Bailey, Kenyon, and Forster: the younger poets, Clough, Arnold, 
and Patmore; and, among the men of science, Robert Brown, Owen, 
Sedgwick, Faraday, Buckland, Lyell, De la Beche, Hooker, Car- 
penter, Babbage, and Edward Forbes. It was my privilege also to 
converse with Miss Baillie, with Lady Morgan, with Mrs. Jameson, 
and Mrs. Somerville. A finer hospitality made many private houses 
not less known and dear. It is not in distinguished circles that 
wisdom and elevated characters are usually found, or, if found, not 
confined thereto; and my recollections of the best hours go back to 
private conversations in different parts of the kingdom, with persons 
little known. Nor am I insensible to the courtesy which frankly 
opened to me some noble mansions, if I do not adorn my page with 



464 ENGLISH TRAITS 

their names. Among the privileges of London, I recall with pleasure 
two or three signal days, one at Kew, where Sir William Hooker 
showed me all the riches of the vast botanic garden; one at the 
Museum, where Sir Charles Fellowes explained in detail the history 
of his Ionic trophy-monument; and still another, on which Mr. 
Owen accompanied my countryman Mr. H. and myself through the 
Hunterian Museum. 

The like frank hospitality, bent on real service, I found among 
the great and the humble, wherever I went; in Birmingham, in 
Oxford, in Leicester, in Nottingham, in Sheffield, in Manchester, 
in Liverpool. At Edinburgh, through the kindness of Dr. Samuel 
Brown, I made the acquaintance of De Quincey, of Lord Jeffrey, 
of Wilson, of Mrs. Crowe, of the Messrs. Chambers, and of a man 
of high character and genius, the short-lived painter, David Scott. 

At Ambleside, in March, 1848, I was for a couple of days the 
guest of Miss Martineau, then newly returned from her Egyptian 
tour. On Sunday afternoon I accompanied her to Rydal Mount. 
And as I have recorded a visit to Wordsworth, many years before, 
I must not forget this second interview. We found Mr. Wordsworth 
asleep on the sofa. He was at first silent and indisposed, as an old 
man suddenly waked, before he had ended his nap; but soon became 
full of talk on the French news. He was nationally bitter on the 
French: bitter on Scotchmen, too. No Scotchman, he said, can 
write English. He detailed the two models, on one or the other of 
which all the sentences of the historian Robertson are framed. Nor 
could Jeffrey nor the Edinburgh Reviewers write English, nor can 
. . . , who is a pest to the English tongue. Incidentally he added, 
Gibbon cannot write English. The Edinburgh Review wrote what 
would tell and what would sell. It had however changed the tone 
of its literary criticism from the time when a certain letter was 
written to the editor by Coleridge. Mrs. W. had the editor's answer 
in her possession. Tennyson he thinks a right poetic genius, though 
with some affectation. He had thought an elder brother of Tenny- 
son at first the better poet, but must now reckon Alfred the true one. 
... In speaking of I know not what style, he said, "to be sure, it 
was the manner, but then you know the matter always comes out 
of the manner." . . . He thought Rio Janeiro the best place in the 



PERSONAL 465 

world for a great capital city, . . . We talked of English national 
character, I told him, it was not creditable that no one in all the 
country knew anything of Thomas Taylor, the Platonist, whilst in 
every American hbrary his translations are found. I said, if Plato's 
RepubUc were published in England as a new book to-day, do you 
think it would find any readers ? — he confessed, it would not : "And 
yet," he added after a pause, with that complacency which never 
deserts a true-born Englishman, "and yet we have embodied it all," 
His opinions of French, English, Irish, and Scotch seemed rashly 
formuhzed from Utde anecdotes of what had befallen himself and 
members of his family, in a diligence or stagecoach. His face some- 
times lighted up, but his conversation was not marked by special 
force or elevation. Yet perhaps it is a high compliment to the 
cultivation of the EngHsh generally, when we find such a man not 
distinguished. He had a healthy look, with a weather-beaten face, 
his face corrugated, especially the large nose- 
Miss Martineau, who lived near him, praised him to me not for 
his poetry, but for thrift and economy; for having afforded to his 
country-neighbors an example of a modest household, where com- 
fort and culture were secured without any display. She said that, 
in his early housekeeping at the cottage where he first lived, he was 
accustomed to offer his friends bread and plainest fare: if they 
wanted anything more, they must pay him for their board. It was 
the rule of the house. I replied that it evinced EngUsh pluck more 
than any anecdote I knew. A gendeman in the neighborhood told 
the story of Walter Scott's staying once for a week with Words- 
worth, and slipping out every day under pretence of a walk, to the 
Swan Inn, for a cold cut and porter; and one day passing with 
Wordsworth the inn, he was betrayed by the landlord's asking him 
if he had come for his porter. Of course, this trait would have 
another look in London, and there you will hear from different 
literary men that Wordsworth had no personal friend, that he was 
not amiable, that he was parsimonious, &c. Landor, always generous, 
says that he never praised anybody, A gentleman in London showed 
me a watch that once belonged to Milton, whose initials are en- 
graved on its face. He said, he once showed this to Wordsworth, 
who took it in one hand, then drew out his own watch, and held it 



466 ENGLISH TRAITS 

up with the other, before the company, but no one making the 
expected remark, he put back his own in silence. I do not attach 
much importance to the disparagement of Wordsworth among 
London scholars. Who reads him well will know that in following 
the strong bent of his genius, he was careless of the many, careless 
also of the few, self-assured that he should "create the taste by which 
he is to be enjoyed." He lived long enough to witness the revolution 
he had wrought, and "to see what he foresaw." There are torpid 
places in his mind, there is something hard and sterile in his poetry, 
want of grace and variety, want of due catholicity and cosmopolitan 
scope: he had conformities to English politics and traditions; he 
had egotistic puerilities in the choice and treatment of his subjects; 
but let us say of him that, alone in his time, he treated the human 
mind well, and with an absolute trust. His adherence to his poetic 
creed rested on real inspirations. The Ode on Immortality is the 
high-water mark which the intellect has reached in this age. New 
means were employed, and new realms added to the empire of the 
muse, by his courage. 

CHAPTER XVIII 



England is the best of actual nations. It is no ideal framework, 
it is an old pile built in different ages, with repairs, additions, and 
makeshifts; but you see the poor best you have got. London is the 
epitome of our times, and the Rome of to-day. Broad-fronted, broad- 
bottomed Teutons, they stand in soHd phalanx foursquare to the 
points of compass; they constitute the modern world, they have 
earned their vantage-ground, and held it through ages of adverse 
possession. They are well marked and differing from other leading 
races. England is tender-hearted. Rome was not. England is not 
so public in its bias; private life is its place of honor. Truth in 
private life, untruth in public, marks these home-loving men. Their 
political conduct is not decided by general views, but by internal 
intrigues and personal and family interest. They cannot readily see 
beyond England. The history of Rome and Greece, when written 
by their scholars, degenerates into English party pamphlets. They 



RESULT 467 

cannot see beyond England, nor in England can they transcend the 
interests of the governing classes. "English principles" mean a pri- 
mary regard to the interests of property. England, Scodand, and 
Ireland combine to check the colonies. England and Scotland com- 
bine to check Irish manufactures and trade. England rallies at 
home to check Scodand. In England, the strong classes check the 
weaker. In the home population of near thirty millions, there are 
but one million voters. The Church punishes dissent, punishes edu- 
cation. Down to a late day, marriages performed by dissenters were 
illegal. A bitter class-legislation gives power to those who are rich 
enough to buy a law. The game-laws are a proverb of oppression. 
Pauperism incrusts and clogs the state, and in hard times becomes 
hideous. In bad seasons, the porridge was diluted. Multitudes lived 
miserably by shell-fish and sea-ware. In cities, the children are 
trained to beg, until they shall be old enough to rob. Men and 
women were convicted of poisoning scores of children for burial- 
fees. In Irish districts, men deteriorated in size and shape, the nose 
sunk, the gums were exposed, with diminished brain and brutal 
form. During the Australian emigration, multitudes were rejected 
by the commissioners as being too emaciated for useful colonists. 
During the Russian war, few of those that offered as recruits were 
found up to the medical standard, though it had been reduced. 

The foreign policy of England, though ambitious and lavish of 
money, has not often been generous or just. It has a principal regard 
to the interest of trade, checked however by the aristocratic bias 
of the ambassador, which usually puts him in sympathy with the 
continental Courts. It sanctioned the partition of Poland, it betrayed 
Genoa, Sicily, Parga, Greece, Turkey, Rome, and Hungary. 

Some public regards they have. They have abolished slavery in 
the West Indies, and put an end to human sacrifices in the East. 
At home they have a certain statute hospitality. England keeps 
open doors, as a trading country must, to all nations. It is one of 
their fixed ideas, and wrathfuUy supported by their laws in unbroken 
sequence for a thousand years. In Magna Charta it was ordained 
that all "merchants shall have safe and secure conduct to go out and 
come into England, and to stay there, and to pass as well by land 
as by water, to buy and sell by the ancient allowed customs, without 



468 ENGLISH TRAITS 

any evil toll, except in time of war, or when they shall be of any 
nation at war with us." It is a statute and obliged hospitality, and 
peremptorily maintained. But this shop-rule had one magnificent 
effect. It extends its cold unalterable courtesy to political exiles of 
every opinion, and is a fact which might give additional light to 
that portion of the planet seen from the farthest star. But this 
perfunctory hospitality puts no sweetness into their unaccommo- 
dating manners, no check on that puissant nationality which makes 
their existence incompatible with all that is not English. 

What we must say about a nation is a superficial dealing with 
symptoms. We cannot go deep enough into the biography of the 
spirit who never throws himself entire into one hero, but delegates 
his energy in parts or spasms to vicious and defective individuals. 
But the wealth of the source is seen in the plenitude of English 
nature. What variety of power and talent; what facility and plente- 
ousness of knighthood, lordship, ladyship, royalty, loyalty; what a 
proud chivalry is indicated in "CoUins's Peerage," through eight 
hundred years! What dignity resting on what reality and stoutness! 
What courage in war, what sinew in labor, what cunning workmen, 
what inventors and engineers, what seamen and pilots, what clerks 
and scholars! No one man and no few men can represent them. 
It is a people of myriad personahties. Their many-headedness is 
owing to the advantageous position of the middle class, who are 
always the source of letters and science. Hence the vast plenty of 
their aesthetic production. As they are many-headed, so they are 
many-nationed: their colonization annexes archipelagoes and conti- 
nents, and their speech seems destined to be the universal language 
of men. I have noted the reserve of power in the English tem- 
perament. In the island, they never let out all the length of all 
the reins, there is no Berserkir rage, no abandonment or ecstasy of 
will or intellect, like that of the Arabs in the time of Mahomet, or 
like that which intoxicated France in 1789. But who would see the 
uncoiling of that tremendous spring, the explosion of their well-hus- 
banded forces, must follow the swarms which, pouring now for 
two hundred years from the British islands, have sailed, and rode, 
and traded, and planted, through all climates, mainly following the 
belt of empire, the temperate zones, carrying the Saxon seed, with 



RESULT 469 

its instinct for liberty and law, for arts and for thought, — acquiring 
under some skies a more electric energy than the native air allows, — 
to the conquest of the globe. Their colonial policy, obeying the 
necessities of a vast empire, has become Hberal. Canada and Aus- 
tralia have been contented with substantial independence. They are 
expiating the wrongs of India, by benefits; first, in works for the 
irrigation of the peninsula, and roads and telegraphs; and secondly, 
in the instruction of the people, to qualify them for self-government, 
when the British power shall be finally called home. 

Their mind is in a state of arrested development, — a divine cripple 
like Vulcan; a blind savant like Huber and Sanderson. They do not 
occupy themselves on matters of general and lasting import, but on 
a corporeal civilization, on goods that perish in the using. But they 
read with good intent, and what they learn they incarnate. The 
English mind turns every abstraction it can receive into a portable 
utensil, or a working institution. Such is their tenacity, and such 
their practical turn, that they hold all they gain. Hence we say 
that only the English race can be trusted with freedom, — freedom 
which is double-edged and dangerous to any but the wise and robust. 
The English designate the kingdoms emulous of free institutions, 
as the sentimental nations. Their culture is not an outside varnish, 
but is thorough and secular in families and the race. They are 
oppressive with their temperament, and all the more that they are 
refined. I have sometimes seen them walk with my countrymen 
when I was forced to allow them every advantage, and their com- 
panions seemed bags of bones. 

There is cramp limitation in their habit of thought, sleepy routine, 
and a tortoise's instinct to hold hard to the ground with his claws, 
lest he should be thrown on his back. There is a drag of inertia 
which resists reform in every shape; — law-reform, army-reform, ex- 
tension of suffrage, Jewish franchise, Catholic emancipation, — the 
abolition of slavery, of impressment, penal code, and entails. They 
praise this drag, under the formula that it is the excellence of the 
British constitution, that no law can anticipate the public opinion. 
These poor tortoises must hold hard, for they feel no wings sprout- 
ing at their shoulders. Yet somewhat divine warms at their heart, 
and waits a happier hour. It hides in their sturdy will. "Will," 



470 ENGLISH TRAITS 

said the old philosophy, "is the measure of power," and personaUty 
is the token of this race. Quid vult valde vult. What they do they 
do with a will. You cannot account for their success by their Chris- 
tianity, commerce, charter, common law. Parliament, or letters, but 
by the contumacious sharp-tongued energy of English naturel, with 
a poise impossible to disturb, which makes all these its instruments. 
They are slow and reticent, and are like a dull good horse which lets 
every nag pass him, but with whip and spur will run down every 
racer in the field. They are right in their feehng, though wrong 
in their speculation. 

The feudal system survives in the steep inequality of property 
and privilege, in the limited franchise, in the social barriers which 
confine patronage and promotion to a caste, and still more in the 
submissive ideas pervading these people. The fagging of the schools 
is repeated in the social classes. An Englishman shows no mercy to 
those below him in the social scale, as he looks for none from those 
above him: any forbearance from his superiors surprises him, and 
they suffer in his good opinion. But the feudal system can be seen 
with less pain on large historical grounds. It was pleaded in miti- 
gation of the rotten borough, that it worked well, that substantial 
justice was done. Fox, Burke, Pitt, Erskine, Wilberforce, Sheridan, 
Romilly, or whatever national man, were by this means sent to 
Parliament, when their return by large constituencies would have 
been doubtful. So now we say that the right measures of England 
are the men it bred; that it has yielded more able men in five 
hundred years than any other nation; and, though we must not 
play Providence, and balance the chances of producing ten great 
men against the comfort of ten thousand mean men, yet retrospec- 
tively we may strike the balance, and prefer one Alfred, one Shaks- 
peare, one Milton, one Sidney, one Raleigh, one Wellington, to a 
million foolish democrats. 

The American system is more democratic, more humane; yet the 
American people do not yield better or more able men, or more 
inventions or books or benefits, than the English. Congress is not 
wiser or better than Parhament. France has abolished its suffocating 
old regime, but is not recently marked by any more wisdom or 
virtue. 



SPEECH AT MANCHESTER 47 1 

The power of performance has not been exceeded, — the creation 
of value. The EngHsh have given importance to individuals, a prin- 
cipal end and fruit of every society. Every man is allowed and en- 
couraged to be what he is, and is guarded in the indulgence of 
his whim. "Magna Charta," said Rushworth, "is such a fellow that 
he will have no sovereign." By this general activity, and by this 
sacredness of individuals, they have in seven hundred years evolved 
the principles of freedom. It is the land of patriots, martyrs, sages, 
and bards, and if the ocean out of which it emerged should wash 
it away, it will be remembered as an island famous for immortal 
laws, for the announcements of original right which make the stone 
tables of Uberty. 

CHAPTER XIX 

SPEECH AT MANCHESTER 

A FEW days after my arrival at Manchester, in November, 1847, 
the Manchester Athenaeum gave its annual Banquet in the Free- 
Trade Hall. With other guests, I was invited to be present, and to 
address the company. In looking over recently a newspaper-report 
of my remarks, I incline to reprint it, as fitly expressing the feeling 
with which I entered England, and which agrees well enough with 
the more deliberate results of better acquaintance recorded in the 
foregoing pages. Sir Archibald Alison, the historian, presided, and 
opened the meeting with a speech. He was followed by Mr. Cobden, 
Lord Brackley, and others, among whom was Mr. Cruikshank, 
one of the contributors to "Punch." Mr. Dickens's letter of apology 
for his absence was read. Mr. Jerrold, who had been announced, 
did not appear. On being introduced to the meeting, I said: — 

Mr. Chairman and Gentlemen: It is pleasant to me to meet this 
great and brilliant company, and doubly pleasant to see the faces 
of so many distinguished persons on this platform. But I have 
known all these persons already. When I was at home, they were 
as near to me as they are to you. The arguments of the League and 
its leader are known to all the friends of free trade. The gayeties 
and genius, the political, the social, the parietal wit of "Punch" go 
duly every fortnight to every boy and girl in Boston and New York. 



472 ENGLISH TRAITS 

Sir, when I came to sea, I found the "History of Europe" ' on the 
ship's cabin table, the property of the captain; — a sort of programme 
or play-bill to tell the sea-faring New Englander what he shall find 
on his landing here. And as for Dombey, sir, there is no land where 
paper exists to print on, where it is not found; no man who can 
read, that does not read it, and, if he cannot, he finds some charitable 
pair of eyes that can, and hears it. 

But these things are not for me to say; these compliments, though 
true, would better come from one who felt and understood these 
merits more. I am not here to exchange civilities with you, but 
rather to speak of that which I am sure interests these gentlemen more 
than their own praises; of that which is good in holidays and 
working-days, the same in one century and in another century. 
That which lures a solitary American in the woods with the wish 
to see England, is the moral peculiarity of the Saxon race, — its com- 
manding sense of right and wrong, — the love and devotion to that, — 
this is the imperial trait, which arms them with the sceptre of the 
globe. It is this which lies at the foundation of that aristocratic 
character, which certainly wanders into strange vagaries, so that its 
origin is often lost sight of, but which, if it should lose this, would 
find itself paralyzed; and in trade, and in the mechanic's shop, 
gives that honesty in performance, that thoroughness and solidity 
of work, which is a national characteristic. This conscience is one 
element, and the other is that loyal adhesion, that habit of friendship, 
that homage of man to man, running through all classes, — the 
electing of worthy persons to a certain fraternity, to acts of kindness 
and warm and stanch support, from year to year, from youth to 
age, — which is alike lovely and honorable to those who render and 
•■hose who receive it; — which stands in strong contrast with the 
superficial attachments of other races, their excessive courtesy, and 
short-lived connection. 

You will think me very pedantic, gentlemen, but holiday though 
it be, I have not the smallest interest in any holiday except as it 
celebrates real and not pretended joys; and I think it just, in this 
time of gloom and commercial disaster, of aflSiction and beggary in 

' By Sir A. Alison. 



SPEECH AT MANCHESTER 473 

these districts, that, on these very accounts I speak of, you should 
not fail to keep your literary anniversary. I seem to hear you say 
that, for all that is come and gone yet, we will not reduce by one 
chaplet or one oak leaf the braveries of our annual feast. For I must 
tell you, I was given to understand in my childhood that the British 
island from which my forefathers came, was no lotus-garden, no 
paradise of serene sky and roses and music and merriment all the 
year round, no, but a cold foggy mournful country, where nothing 
grew well in the open air, but robust men and virtuous women, and 
these of a wonderful fibre and endurance; that their best parts were 
slowly revealed; their virtues did not come out until they quarrelled: 
they did not strike twelve the first time; good lovers, good haters, 
and you could know little about them till you had seen them long, 
and little good of them till you had seen them in action; that in 
prosperity they were moody and dumpish, but in adversity they 
were grand. Is it not true, sir, that the wise ancients did not praise 
the ship parting with flying colors from the port, but only that 
brave sailer which came back with torn sheets and battered sides, 
stript of her banners, but having ridden out the storm? And so, 
gentlemen, I feel in regard to this aged England, with the posses- 
sions, honors, and trophies, and also with the infirmities, of a 
thousand years gathering around her, irretrievably committed as she 
now is to many old customs which cannot be suddenly changed; 
pressed upon by the transitions of trade, and new and all incalculable 
modes, fabrics, arts, machines, and competing populations, — I see 
her not dispirited, not weak, but well remembering that she has 
seen dark days before; — indeed, with a kind of instinct that she sees 
a little better in a cloudy day, and that in storm of battle and 
calamity, she has a secret vigor and a pulse like a cannon. I see 
her in her old age, not decrepit, but young, and still daring to believe 
in her power of endurance and expansion. Seeing this, I say, All hail! 
mother of nations, mother of heroes, with strength still equal to the 
time; still wise to entertain and swift to execute the policy which the 
mind and heart of mankind requires in the present hour, and thus 
only hospitable to the foreigner, and truly a home to the thoughtful 
and generous who are born in the soil. So be it! so let it be! If it be 



474 ENGLISH TRAITS 

not so, if the courage o£ England goes with the chances of a com- 
mercial crisis, I will go back to the capes of Massachusetts, and my 
own Indian stream, and say to my countrymen, the old race are 
all gone, and the elasticity and hope of mankind must henceforth 
remain on the Alleghany ranges, or nowhere. 




i